throbber
1119 Journal of
`“plied Medicine
`1,; the Primary care
`physician
`
`l l&§!i~ir\'rn
`
`University of Wisconsin
`1305 Linden Dl'.,
`lvlndison, Wis, 53706
`
`SEP 23 1887
`
`Renal disease: Managing acute, renal failure 0 When is hematuria a
`cause for alarm? 0 Renal disease‘_r'e1sulting from too much uric acid
`_
`H
`-
`,
`_
`High-carbohydrate, hug‘fi5Fil:’ier'diet‘to‘r treating hyperlipldemia 0 How to
`
`
`
`control persistent nosebleed 0 Oral contraceptives: Who, which,
`
`when, and why? 0 Loss of function in the frail elderly 0 Breast cancer
`
`presenting as periostitis 0 Sportsrelated CNS injuries in children
`Complete contents beginning page 5
`
`Carbohydrates and fiber: Modifying diet to reduce heart disease
`
`--.4
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg.1
`
`Editorial
`The rooter man taught
`-me about charging for
`after-hours service
`
`Renal disease
`1947-‘i987
`APGM retrospective by
`H. E. de Wardener, MD, FRCP
`
`Coming in the next issue:
`APGM symposium on
`
`m...
`O‘
`(Q.
`N.
`)
`v-4
`U‘
`‘ /E.-1.
`{T1
`
`UQ
`
`OC
`
`‘V-..
`‘V-A
`-:~3‘-.
`.\'nA
`~x-34.A
`n:.
`f‘..V.A
`.)".J..
`u".A
`."-.
`1".A
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 1
`
`

`
`i
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`1
`
`I
`3
`
`1',
`.
`
`L I
`
`.
`
`'
`
`1
`I,It
`
`,
`«.
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
`The Journal of Applied Medicine for the Primary Care Physician
`
`SEPTEMBER 15, 1987
`VOLUME 82
`NUMBER 4
`
`
`EDITORIAL
`13
`THE ROOTER MAN TAUGI-IT ME ABOUT CHARGING
`FOR AFTER-HOURS SERVICE
`Glen C. Griffin, MD
`
`Service with a smile, for a price
`
`AT-LARGE
`
`19
`
`HURRAH FOR THE PATIENT!
`J. Mostyn Davis, MD
`
` PHYSlGIAN-
`
`A cheer for those who endure pain, suffering, and the medical
`system
`
`HIGH-FIBER
`DIET FOR
`HYPERLIPIDEMIA
`
`40
`
`HIGH-CARBOHYDRATE, HIGH-FIBER DIET: IS IT
`PRACTICAL AND EFFECTIVE IN TREATING HYPEFILIPIDEMIA?
`James VII. Anderson, MD, Nancy J. Gustafson, MS, RD
`Reduction of coronary artery disease risk through diet
`
`EPISTAXIS
`
`59
`
`EPISTAXIS: HOW TO CONTROL THE PEFISISTENT NOSEBLEED
`Stanton A. Enivin, MD
`
`Methods the physician can use to stop bleeding refractory to home
`[I
`remedies
`I
`__1 I
`ORAL '
`66
`ORAL CONTRAGEPTIVES: WHO. WHICH, WHEN, AND WHY?
`I
`GONTRACEPTIVES
`Edward L. Marut, MD
`'
`
`OPINION
`
`GERIATRIC
`ASSESSMENT
`
`13
`
`75
`
`Answers to questions about "the pill” and discussion of benefits
`
`DEGEPTION
`Selig J. Kavka, MD
`A thought—provoking medical fish story
`
`,
`
`LOSS OF FUNCTION IN THE FRAIL ELDERLY: A METHOD
`FOR DETERMINING THE UNDERLYING CAUSES
`Gerald K. Goodenough, MD, MSPH, Lawrence J. Lutz, MD, MSPH
`
`DESIPRAMINE
`TOXICITY
`
`’
`
`86
`
`DESIPRAIIIIINE-INDUCED OONDUGTION DISORDER
`MIMICKING MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (Case Report)
`Douglas B. Smith, MD, John W Tyznik, MD
`
`A new electrocardiographic finding associated with desipramine
`toxicity
`’
`
`' T '
`‘J I
`*0
`
`POSTGRADUATE MEDIClNE® (ISSN 0032-5481) is published monthly, with additional issues in February. May, September, and November Executive, editorial. circulation,
`and advertising ofticos: 4530 W 77th St, Minneapolis, MN 55435. Telephone: 612-535-3222. Second class postage paid at New York, NY, and additional mailing offices; post-
`age paid at Winnipeg. MB (registration No. 9459).
`'
`H Subscription rate per year (US funds): US regular $44; US students $33; Canada regular $47: Canada students $35.25; foreign countries 870, single copy rate‘ US $5;
`Canada $5.50; foreign countries $7. Please allow 4 to 12 weeks for shipment. Subscription orders and correspondence should be sent to the Circulation Department at the
`address shown above. Please enclose mailing label from issue. Allow 4 to 6 weeks for change of address.
`Copyright 1987 by McGraw-Hill, Inc, all rights reserved. Where necessary, permission is granted by the copyright owner for libraries and others registered with the Copyright Clearance
`Center (CCC) to photocopy any article herein for the base tee of $2.35 per copy of the article. Payment should be sent directly to the CCC: 21 Congress St. Salem, MA 01970. Copying
`done for other than personal or internal reference use without the express permission of McGraw-Hill is prohibited. Requests for special permission or bulk orders should be addressed to
`the publisher. ISSN 0032-5481/87 $2.35. POSTMASTER: Please send address changes to POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 4580 W 77th St, Minneapolis. MN 55435.
`continued on page 7
`
`VOL 82/NO 4/SEPTEMBER 15. 1987/POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
`
`5
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 2
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 2
`
`

`
`(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:92)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:90)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:55)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:3)(cid:56)(cid:17)(cid:54)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:12)(cid:3)
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 3
`
`

`
`according to their manufacturers,
`are physiologic or more natural
`than their fixed-dose counter-
`
`parts. In my opinion, this is a fal-
`lacy, because the purpose of
`« oral contraceptives is nonphysio-
`logic, ie, to block ovulation and
`prevent conception.
`What multiphasics should
`provide is a reduction in proges-
`tin-related side effects. How-
`
`ever, the total hormone dose per
`cycle is lower for some fixed—dose
`products than for multiphasics.
`ln everyday usage, the inflexibili-
`ty of the preplanned dosage of
`multiphasics makes intracycle
`adjustments more difficult and
`proper use somewhat trickier
`than with fixed-dose oral contra-
`
`ceptives. Although the multi-
`phasics are said to cause less
`breakthrough bleeding than the
`standard fixed—dose counterpart,
`this may not be the case.“
`
`When should the pill cycle be
`started?
`Considerable flexibility is allowed
`in starting oral contraceptive
`use. Manufacturers’ directions
`
`range from starting on day 1 of
`the menstrual cycle to starting
`on the first Sunday of the cycle (to
`avoid subsequent weekend
`menses). The patient can gener-
`ally begin taking the pills on
`any day up to the sixth day of
`her cycle, presuming a normal
`period and a cycle length of at
`least 28 days. If the usual cycle
`
`length is less than 28 days, use
`of the pills must be started earlier
`or a backup method of contracep-
`tion must be used. Because the
`follicle destined to ovulate is
`selected seven days before ovula-
`tion, the pill cycle can be ini-
`tiated up to day 6. If ovulation
`occurs before day 14, the dom-
`inant follicle may go on to ovulate
`unless the patient begins taking
`the pills before the selection
`process occurs.
`When to start oral contracep-
`tive therapy after early termina-
`tion of pregnancy (elective or
`spontaneous], after delivery, or
`after nursing depends on when
`ovulation is likely to resume
`in each situation. After a first-
`trimester abortion or miscar-
`
`riage, oral contraceptive therapy
`should be started Within six
`
`days——just as in a regular men-
`strual cyc1e—since some women
`ovulate about two weeks after
`
`the termination of pregnancy.
`For a pregnancy loss in the
`second or third trimester when
`lactation is suppressed by bromo-
`criptine (Parlodel), the pill should
`be started within two weeks,
`since ovulation may occur three
`to four weeks later. This is also
`
`true for a premature or full-term
`delivery when bromocriptine has
`been administered, since the
`reduction in prolactin levels re-
`sults in a faster return to regular
`cyclicity.
`A woman who breast-feeds
`
`should not use combination oral
`
`contraceptives until nursing is
`well established, since the milk
`supply may be decreased by
`immediate postpartum use. How-
`ever, ovulation may resume in a
`mother who is breast-feeding
`but has reduced suckling epi-
`sodes. Therefore, an alternative
`method of contraception should
`be used by all nursing mothers as
`soon as they resume sexual
`activity post partum. (Although
`small amounts of hormone are
`excreted in breast milk“ “ and the
`
`absolute safety to the infant is
`not established, the American
`Academy of Pediatrics“ approves
`use of oral contraceptives by
`breast-feeding mothers.)
`
`When is worryjustified?
`Warning signs of potential major
`complications of oral contracep-
`tives must be heeded. These
`
`complications are mostly cardio-
`vascular: thromboembolism.
`cerebrovascular accidents, myo-
`cardial infarction, and hyperten-
`sion.2'5 A patient with symptoms
`referable to these complications
`(table 3] should seek medical
`advice immediately. Abdominal
`pain is included in table 3 be-
`cause of the risk of hepatocellular
`adenoma associated with use of
`oral contraceptives. This disease
`is rare (3 to 4/ 100,000 long-
`term users] but potentially fatal.
`The absolute risk in most
`
`women taking oral contracep-
`continued
`
`VOL B2/NO 4/SEPTEMBER 15. 1987/POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE 0 ORAL GONTRAGEPTIVES
`
`
`
`67
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 4
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 4
`
`

`
`Side effects related
`to either progestin or
`estrogen in oral
`contraceptives may
`be alleviated by
`adjusting the appro-
`priate component.
`
`
`
`Table 1. Contraindications to use
`of oral contraceptives
`
`Table 2. Relative effects of
`progestins at similar doses
`
`Absolute contraindications
`Cardiovascular or thromboembolic
`disease
`Estrogen—dependent neoplasm
`Liver neoplasm
`Active liver disease
`Persistent hypertension
`
`Strong relative contraindications
`Migraine or vascular headaches
`Diabetes
`Gallbladder disease
`Hemoglobin S-3 or S-C disease
`Immobilization or leg injury
`Age over 40 yr and second risk
`factor for cardiovascular disease
`Age over 35 yr and history of heavy
`smoking
`
`Possible relative contraindications
`Family history of absolute or strong
`relative contraindications
`Previous cholestatic disease or
`recent liver disease
`Lactation
`Psychiatric disease
`Varices
`Asthma
`Seizure disorder
`Leiomyomata uteri
`
`Androgenic
`Norethynod rel
`Ethynodiol diacetate
`Norethindrone
`Norethindrone acetate
`Norgestrel
`Levonorgestrel
`
`Progestational
`Norethindrone
`Norethynod rel
`Norethindrone acetate
`Ethynodiol diacetate
`Norgeslrel
`Levonorgestrel
`
`O
`1.0
`1.6
`2.5
`7.5
`15.0
`
`1.0
`1.1
`2.0
`15.0
`30.0
`60.0
`
`Table 3. Warning signs of major
`complications with oral
`contraceptive use
`
`Abdominal pain
`Chest pain or dyspnea
`Headache or neurologic symptoms
`Visual or speech problems
`Leg pain or weakness
`
`tives is low. A British study‘ es-
`tablished that the excess annual
`cardiovascular mortality for
`women taking the pill is 1/77,000
`for nonsmokers under 35 years
`of age, 1/10,000 for smokers un-
`der 35, 1 /6,700 for nonsmokers
`between 35 and 40, and 1/2,000
`for smokers between 35 and 40.
`
`When should the regimen be
`changed?
`A woman who experiences
`breakthrough bleeding while
`taking low-dose combination oral
`contraceptives usually finds
`that it disappears after a few cy-
`cles. lfthe breakthrough bleeding
`persists, the first option is to
`
`add estrogen (10 to 20 ug of ethi-
`nyl estradiol or equivalent) for
`the remainder of the cycle. Often
`this is enough to stabilize the
`endometriurn. If breakthrough
`bleeding recurs, changing to a
`50—ug preparation for several cy-
`cles may be useful.
`Amenorrhea with use of oral
`
`contraceptives is also caused by
`the effect of a low level of estro-
`
`gen on the endometrium. This is
`unsettling but not dangerous.
`A woman who is amenorrheic
`
`while properly taking the pill can
`be reassured, but a pregnancy
`test may be necessary to relieve
`anxiety.
`Estrogen may be added for
`breakthrough bleeding to obtain
`some endometrial proliferation,
`but increasing the estrogen con-
`tent of the pill seems unwise
`for long-term use because of the
`increased likelihood of side ef-
`
`fects. Manipulating the progestin-
`estrogen ratio by lowering the
`amount of progestin may be use-
`ful in breakthrough bleeding
`and amenorrhea, since both are
`caused by a relative insufficiency
`of estrogen.
`Nuisance side effects related to
`
`progestin or estrogen may be
`alleviated by adjusting the appro-
`priate component. With low-
`dcse combination pills, these ef-
`fects are fortunately uncommon.
`If side effects are androgenic [eg.
`acne, weight gain], the relative
`
`68
`
`ORAL CONTHACEPTIVES ' VOL B2/NO 4/SEPTEMBER 15. 1987/POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 5
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 5
`
`

`
`Evidence supports a protective effect of oral
`contraceptives against endometrial and
`ovarian malignancy, benign breast disease,
`and infection of the upper genital tract.
`
`Replacement parts
`for your prescribing
`armamentarium
`
`<
`
`,x~
`
`_ J
`
`'1
`. y /
`
`
`
`Sta.
`,-"5;
`
`\ k
`
`,§;/
`
`Soma“
`Compound
`
`(carisoprodol 200 mg and
`aspirin 325 mg tablets, USP)
`
`(‘fl WALLACE LABORATORIES
`
`Division of Carter-Wallace Inc.
`Cranbury, New Jersey 0512
`
`Edward L. Marut
`Dr Marut is director division of
`reproductive endocrinology and
`infertility, department of obstet-
`rics and gynecology Michael
`Reese Hospital and Medical
`Center, Chicago, and assistant
`professor of obstetrics and
`gynecology, University of Chica-
`go Pritzker School of Medicine.
`
`
`
`androgenic effect of the proges-
`tins [table 2] should be considered
`so that appropriate adjustments
`can be made. If side effects are
`
`progestational (cg, headaches,
`depression), the relative progesta-
`tional potency of the progestins
`(table 2) should likewise be con-
`sidered. Estrogen side effects
`include fluid retention, nausea,
`and headache. Keeping the estro-
`gen content below 50 pg should
`minimize these side effects.
`
`(Whether ethinyl estradiol and
`rnestranol are equivalent in es-
`trogenicity is still contmversial.
`However. since all pills with less
`than 50 pg of estrogen contain
`
`ethinyl estradlol, this may not be
`a critical point.)
`
`Why should women take the
`pill‘?
`Besides the obvious contraceptive
`benefit of the combination pill—
`an effectiveness superiorto
`that of all other nonsurgical
`forms of contraception-the
`many noncontiaceptive benefits
`are good reasons to select oral
`contraceptives.
`The mechanism by which oral
`contraceptives act [ie, suppres-
`sion of gonadotropins and, thus,
`of the ovaries) results in men-
`strual regulation, decreased men-
`continued
`
`VOL B2[NO 4/SEPTEMBER 15, 1987/POSTGRADUATE MEDlClNE 0 ORAL COHTRACEPTIVES
`
`
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 6
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 6
`
`

`
`strual flow: and prevention of
`functional ovarian cysts. 12 Evi-
`dence also supports a protective
`effect of the pill against endomo-
`trial and ovarian malignancy,
`most likely by its progestational
`effect on the endometrial lining
`and its suppressive effect on
`the ovaries. The risk of these neo-
`
`plasms is reduced by one half in
`women who have used ora:
`contraceptives. 13
`Most studies indicate no in-
`creased risk of breast cancer in
`
`women taking oral contracep-
`tives, and there is agreement that
`the pill has a protective effect
`against benign breast disease,
`again by eliminating the cyclicity
`of ovarian steroids. Similarly,
`suppression of androgen secre-
`tion by the ovaries can improve
`hirsutism and acne, if either
`is present. Premenstrual symp-
`toms and dysmenorrhea, when
`functional, are often blunted by
`smoothing the usual hormonal
`cyclicity.
`‘
`Interestingly, use of oral con-
`traceptives may protect against
`infection of the upper genital
`tract [salpingitis, pelvic inflam-
`matory disease). W5 The reasons
`for this protection include a
`decrease in menstrual effluent,
`which is a potential culture medi-
`um for bacteria, and thickening
`of cervical mucus, which may
`prevent microorganisms from
`ascending the genital tract.
`
`Summary
`
`The risks of oral contracep-
`tives are very small, and they
`cluster in a subset of users,
`although warning signs of car-
`diovascular complications
`must be heeded. The best
`choice of an oral contraceptive
`is one with an estrogen content
`of 30 to 35 pg. A greater (50 pg]
`content may be necessary
`if breakthrough bleeding or
`amenorrhea persists beyond a
`few t1'eatrnent cycles. The
`starting date for the pill can be
`up to the sixth day of the cycle.
`Noncontraceptive benefits
`of the pill may include a pro-
`tective effect against endomo-
`trial and ovarian malignancy,
`
`benign breast disease, and
`infection of the upper genital
`tract. Both the contraceptive
`and noncontraceptive benefits
`of low-dose combination oral
`contraceptives are desirable.
`They far outweigh the risks
`in women who require a high-
`efficacy. reversible contracep-
`tive and who have no signifi-
`cant contraindication to use of
`the pill. Rivl
`
`Presented at the 71st annual Scientific
`Assembly of the Interstate Postgraduate
`Medical Association. held in San Diego.
`
`Address for correspondence: Edward L.
`Marut. MD. Division of Reproductive
`Endocrinologyand Infertility. Michael
`Reese Hospital and Medical Center,
`Lake Shore Dr at 31 st St, Chicago, IL
`60616.
`
`References
`1. Royal College of General Practitioners. Oral
`contraceptivesand health: report of Royal College of
`General Practitioners. London: Pitrnan Medical, i974-
`2. Jick H. Dinan B. Rothman KJ. Oral contraceptivs
`and nonfatal myocardial infarction. JAMA 1 978;
`2391 141: 1 403-6
`3. Layde PM, Ba-nl V, Kay CR. Further analyses of
`mortality in oral contraceptive users. Lancet 1981:
`lfMar 7):5r11e
`4. Petittt DB, Wingerd J, Pellegrln F. et al. Risk of
`vascular disease in women: smoking. nral contracep-
`tives, nuncontraceptive estrogens. and other factors.
`JAMA l979:242[1 l]:l 150-4
`5. Shapiro S, Slone D. Micttlnen OS, etal. Oml
`contraceptive use in relation to myomi-dial infarction.
`Lancet 1979;1[a119);743-7
`6. Tlkkanen MJ. Nikkila EA. Kane! '1‘. etsl. High
`density llpopmtern-2 and hepatic lipase: reciprocal
`changes produced by estrogen and nnrgestrel. J Clin
`Enclocrinol Metab l 982;54{6]: l 1 13-7
`7. Tikkanen MJ. Nikkila EA. Knnal T. etnl. Reluc-
`tlnn of plasma high-density lipopmtein cholesterol
`and increase of postlreparin plasma hepatic lipase
`activityduring prcgestin treatment. Clin Chim Acta
`l981:ll5(l]:63-71
`
`8. Hitcher RA. Guest F, Stewart F, at Al. Combined
`oral wnti-aceptives. Ln: Williams NB. ed. Contraceptive
`tcchnologi 1986-1987. New York: lrvingtnn Publishers.
`1 9861147-9
`9. Nilsson S, Nygren KG, Johnnsson ED. 'I‘ransferof
`estradiol to human milk. Am J Obstet Gyneoul 1978;
`l32(6]:653-7
`ll). lbdrlywalla VS. Joshl L. Vlrhr K. Effectof
`contraceptive steroids on human lactation. Am J Obstel
`Gynecol l977;127[3]:245-9
`1 1. American Academy ofPediatrics. Breastfeeding
`and contiaceptlcn. Pediatrics 198] :68[ 1]: 133-40
`12. Attitudes toward contraception. Princeton, NJ:
`Gallup Organimtian. 1985 Mar 1
`13. Rubin GL, Peterson I-113. Oral contraceptive use
`and cancer. Contraceptive Tbchnol Update 1985:6
`(Jan): 1- l 4-
`14. OryHW. The noncontraceptive health benefits
`fmm oral contraceptive use. Fam Plann Perspect l9B2:
`l4[4);l82-4
`15. Sennnayake P. Kramer DG. Contraception and
`the etiulogr of pelvic inflammatcrydisease: new
`perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynewl 1980: 138[7 Pt 21-’
`852-60
`
`70
`
`ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES ' VOL B2/NO 4/SEPTEMBER 15. 1987/POSTGRADUATE MED|C|NE
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott |PR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 7
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2014, Pg. 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket