throbber
EXHIBIT 1014
`
`EXHIBIT 1014
`
`

`

`' 'i I
`
`f'ERTILJT\' AND STERILITY
`
`\'ol 5J. No. t. Jnnun.ry 1900
`Prrntt.·d 011 ctt;d.fr-.""f: /Xl~,. ;n U.S.A.
`
`Effect of low-dose oral contraceptive on gonadotropins,
`androgens, and sex hormone binding globulin
`in nonhirsute women*'t
`
`Ana Alvarez Murphy, M.D.:j:·§
`Craig S. Cropp, M.D.I
`Beverly S. Smith, B.S.
`
`Ronald T. Burkman, M.D.#
`Howard A. Zacur, M.D., PhD.V
`
`University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Californio and
`The Johns Hopl~ins Utiiuer;;ity School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
`
`The effectiveness of a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) in suppressing plasma levels
`of gonadotropins, ovarian, and adrenal androgens and stimulating sex hormone-binding
`globulin (SHBG) was evaluated prospectively in nonhirsute women. Thirty-three women
`ingested 35 pg of ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg of norethindrone beginning within day 1 to 5
`of the menstrual cycle. Baseline levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-slimulnting hor(cid:173)
`mone, Lotal testosterone (T), androstenedione (A), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate
`(DHEAS), and SHBG were obtained before ingestion of the OC and repeated after 3, 6
`and, 9 months of OC use on day 1 to 5 of the OC "cycle". A significant suppression of
`gonadotropin levels is seen in nonhirsute women. Sex hormone binding globulin is consis(cid:173)
`tently stimu lated by the low-dose OC. A significant suppression ofT and DHEAS is ob·
`served. No change was seen in levels of A. The demonstrated effects become eviclcntut ::1
`months and are maintained at 6 and 9 months.
`Pertil Steril 53:35, 1990
`
`The use of combined oral contraceptives (OCs) is
`associated with many metabolic changes and side
`effects. OC associated changes such as increased
`risk of peripheral arterial phenomena, myocardial
`infarction in smokers, liver tumors, hypertension,
`
`ncccived June 12, 1 989; revised and accepted August 9, 1989.
`• Supported in part by the General Research Center grant
`PHS RR·OOS27 and grant N0l·HD·32816 from the Notional
`Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
`t Presented at the Thirty-finh Annual Meeting of the Soci·
`ely of Gynecologic Investigations, March 18 to 20, 1988, Bolli·
`more, Maryland.
`t Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of Cali·
`fornia, San Diego School of Medicine.
`§Reprint requests: Ana A. Murphy, M.D., UCSD Medical
`Center 1'·002, 225 Dickinson Street, San Diego, California
`92103.
`U Present add ress: National Cancer 1 nstitute, Bethesda,
`Maryland.
`~ Department of Gyneco iO!.'Y a nd Obstetri cs, Johns Hopkins
`University, School of Medicine.
`II Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecol·
`ogy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
`
`and changes in glucose metabolism appear to bees·
`t.rogen dependent.!-!• To reduce t.he magnitude of
`these changes, the dose of estrogens has been
`markedly reduced such thal most OCs in the
`United States contain 30 to 35 ~g of ethinyl estra(cid:173)
`diol (EE2). There has been a trend to decrease the
`content. of progestogens as well. Progestins de(cid:173)
`crease high-density lipoprotein (HOL)-cholesterol
`and increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cho(cid:173)
`lesterol an effect that promotes heart. disease. The
`arleriosclerotic process responsible for heart at·
`tacks and strokes is att.ribut.ed to the progestin
`component. Oral contraceptive with high progestin
`content, unlike today's low-dose formulations, pro·
`duce the unfavorable lipoprotein levels.6
`Oral contraceptives containing 50 to 80 J.lg ofEE2
`or it's equivalent have been commonly used to treat
`both idiopathic hirsutism and h irsutism associated
`with hyperandrogenemia. Tradil.ionally, OCs have
`been used t.o suppress androgens of ovarian origin.
`However, several studies have indicated suppres(cid:173)
`sion of adrenal androgens such as dehydroepian·
`
`drosterone sulfate (DHEAS) with OC.7•8 Given the
`
`Vol. 53, No. 1, January 1990
`
`Murphy et al. Contracepliues, conadalropins, androgens
`
`35
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1014
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 1
`
`

`

`combined decrease in the OC components, there is
`the possibility that suppression of pituitary-ovar(cid:173)
`ian/adrenal function may not be as "efrective" as
`with higher dose formulations. Additionally, little
`normative data is available on the long term effects
`of low dose OCs on these parameters. The present
`study was designed to evaluate the short and long
`term efl'ect of a low-dose OC on ovarian and adre(cid:173)
`nal function in normal women.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Subjects
`
`Thirty-three healthy, normally menstruating,
`nonhi rsute women aged 18 to 35 years were stud(cid:173)
`ied. None had received steroid treatment within
`the last 3 months before the study. The study pro(cid:173)
`tocol was approved by the internal review board
`and informed consent was obtained from each vol(cid:173)
`unteer. An OC containing 35 J.lg ofEE2 and 1 mg of
`norethindrone (NET) was begun within day 1 to 5
`or the menstrual cycle. Serum samples were ob(cid:173)
`lained between 7 to 9 A.M. before beginning OCs
`and again at 3, 6, and, 9 months on day 1 to 5 of the
`OC "cycle". Day 1 of the OC cycle is the first day
`of OC ingestion. All sera were stored at -2o•c until
`analysis. All patient sera were included in t.he same
`assay t.o eliminat.e inLerassay variabilit.y.
`
`Assay Methods
`
`Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulat(cid:173)
`ing hormone (FSH) were quantified by direct ra(cid:173)
`dioimrmmoassay (RIA) using a second antibody
`precipitation method to separate botmd a nd free
`reactants.!J.ro LER-907 standards were used fo r
`both LH and FSH. Sera were supplied by National
`Institutes of Health (Bethesda, M D). Iodinated an(cid:173)
`tigens were purchased from New England Nuclear
`(Boston, MA). Second antibody was obtained from
`Pell Free?.e Inc. (Rogers, AK). The FSH assay sen(cid:173)
`sitivity is 25 J.lg/mL and 10 JJg/mL for the LH as(cid:173)
`say. The int.ra-assay coefficient of variation was
`2.1% for FSH and 3.2% for LH. Sex hormone-bind(cid:173)
`ing globulin (SHBG) values were determined by
`RIA using a commercial kit (Tech land S.A., Liege,
`Belgium). The sensitivity of the assay is 10 J.lmolf
`L. Androstenedione (A), DHEAS, and total T were
`also determined by RIA according to t he manufac(cid:173)
`turers recommendation (Diagnostic Products Cor(cid:173)
`poration, Los Angeles, CA). The sensitivity of t he
`A assay is 0.02 J.lg/mL, 2.1 J.lg/dL for DHEAS and
`
`so
`
`40
`
`..J 30
`
`X ' C) 20
`z
`
`10
`
`0
`500
`
`400
`
`..J
`X
`
`300
`' u 200
`z
`
`100
`
`0
`
`FSH
`
`0
`
`6
`3
`TI ME IN MONTHS
`
`g
`
`Fi.:urc 1 Effects of n low-close OC on mean (±SE) serum
`FSH and LH levels at baseline and 3, 6, 9 months. •Significant
`difl'erences determined by Dunnett's multiple range test
`(P < 0.005).
`
`11 J.Lg/dL forT. The intra-assay coefficient of varia(cid:173)
`tion was 3.7% for SHBG, 4.3% for A, 0.51% for
`DI-IEAS, and 1.5% forT.
`
`Statistical Methods
`
`Repeated measures analysis of variance and co(cid:173)
`variance was used for analysis of data (Biomedical
`Data Program [BMDP] Statistical Software, Inc.
`Los Angeles, CA). Once statistical significance was
`established with analysis of variance, Dunnett's
`mu ltiple range test was used to compare the base(cid:173)
`line data with that obtained at 3, 6, and, 9 months
`separately (BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.). Re(cid:173)
`sults are expressed as mean± standard error of the
`mean (SEM).
`
`RESULTS
`
`The changes observed for gonadotropins are
`shown in Figure 1. Follicle-stimulating hormone
`levels were significantly reduced from baseline at 3
`months, 6 months, and 9 months (P < 0.002). The
`maximum decrease in FSH occurred at 3 months
`(61 %). Similarly, LH was maximally suppressed
`from baseline by 30% at 3 months with continued
`suppression at 6 and 9 months (P < 0.0001).
`The mean sex hormone binding globulin level
`before treatment was 65.1 ± 4. 7 mmol/L as seen in
`
`36
`
`Murphy et al. Contraceptivl!$, gonadotropins. androgr!fls
`
`Fertility ond Sterility
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1014
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 2
`
`I
`
`

`

`SHBG
`
`200
`
`ISO
`
`100
`
`so
`
`0
`
`...1
`
`' ...1
`
`0
`::£
`z
`
`0
`
`6
`3
`TI ME IN MONTHS
`
`9
`
`Figure 2 EH'ects of o low-dose OC on mean l±SE:) serum
`SHBG levels at baseline and 3, 6, 9 months. ~significanL
`diffe rences determined by DunneLL's mu ltip le range t.est
`lP <0.001).
`
`Figure 2. A statistically significa nt increase oc(cid:173)
`curred at 3 mont hs, which continued at 6 months
`and 9 months (P < 0.0001).
`Serum DHEAS was significantly reduced after 3
`months and 6 months of low-dose OC (P < 0.028) .
`At 9 months DHEAS remained suppressed, as seen
`in Figure 3.
`The plasma levels of A at 3 months, 6 months,
`and 9 months were not significantly different from
`baseline. Total testosterone was significantly de(cid:173)
`creased at 3 months. The effect was maintained at
`6 months and 9 months (P < 0.0001).
`
`DISCUSSION
`Our results are the first to demonstrate that a
`"low dose" monophasic OC s ignificantly sup(cid:173)
`presses serum immunoreactive gonadotropin levels
`in normally menstruaLing women when compared
`with basel ine in the early follicular phase. A
`smaller study by Carr et al. 11 in four women using
`a "higher dose" OC (1.0 mg of NET and 80 Jlg of
`mestranol) found a suppression of serum LH to un (cid:173)
`detectable levels ( <20 ng/mL) and a marked de(cid:173)
`crease of serum FSH that was independen: of the
`t ime before t he contraceptive induced withdrawal
`bleed. A study by Dericks-Tan et al. 12 using a com(cid:173)
`bined low-dose preparation, while showing a trend
`toward decreased gonadotropins, failed to demon(cid:173)
`strate a statistically significant difference. H ow(cid:173)
`ever, significance was not obtained possibly be(cid:173)
`cause of the small sample size (N = 6). While our
`study shows a significant suppression of immuno(cid:173)
`reactive levels of both gonadotropins on lew-dose
`OC, FSH showed a two fold greater decrease than
`LH (60% versus 30%). Such a result may have been
`anticipated since Franchimont et al. 13 reported
`that higher doses of EE2 and it.s derivatives (mes(cid:173)
`tranol and 1-hydroxyethinyl estradiol 1.3, diace-
`
`tate) depressed both LH and FSH, whereas lower
`doses of EE2 (20 ~Jg) primarily suppressed ser um
`FSH in postmenopausal women. Moreover, the
`less pronounced decline in LH seen in our study
`may explain t he failure of E lstein and associates 14
`to detect changes in urinary LH secretion, except
`fo r suppression of the ovulatory peak, in women
`taking 50 11g of mestranol. Taken together with the
`1
`previously published data, 11
`1 our results are con(cid:173)
`'
`:
`sistent with a dose dependent gonadotropin sup(cid:173)
`in normal cycling women adminis(cid:173)
`pression
`tered OCs.
`Because our daLa followed individual pat ients
`prospectively, it was possible to discern t hat a sig(cid:173)
`nificantly larger number of women fa iled to show
`suppression of immu noreactive LH (11 of 33) t han
`fa iled to s how suppression of FSH (3 of 33) (P
`< 0.02). All (three) subjects who showed no sup(cid:173)
`pression of FSH also showed no suppression ofL.H.
`It is widely postulated that differential control of
`gonadotropin secretion is regulated by inh ibin, ac(cid:173)
`tivin, and other ovarian secretory products. W hile
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`3
`
`OH€AS
`
`' -
`
`TESTOSTERONE
`
`ANDROSTENEDIONE
`
`I
`
`...1
`
`0 ' l:l
`
`::>
`
`...1
`0
`
`' l:l
`a.
`
`...1
`;[
`
`' l:l :z
`
`0
`
`0
`
`3
`6
`TIME IN MONTHS
`
`9
`
`Figu r e 3 Effccu or a low-do~e OC on mean (±SE) serum T,
`A, DHEAS levels oL boselinc and 3, 6, 9 months. •SignificonL
`difrerences determined by DunneLL's multiple range test
`(P <0.05).
`
`Vol. 53, No. J, January 1990
`
`Murp h y cL ul. Contraceplives,gonadotropins, ondrogcru;
`
`3 7
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1014
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 3
`
`

`

`lt , 5 £1! "" l Mijff1
`
`q
`
`' I
`I
`I I
`
`·I
`
`the effects of OCs on the secretion of these gonado(cid:173)
`tropin regulatory proteins is unknown, it is possi(cid:173)
`ble that relatively specific inhibitors of FSH are
`stimulated by either estrogens or progestins or that
`suppression of FSH stimulators occurs. Alterna(cid:173)
`tively it could be argued chat inabil ity to detect
`equal changes in LH is an artifact that results from
`the greater pulsatile excursions in human serum of
`LH resu lting from the much shorter half life of LH
`than FSH.
`Sex hormone-binding globulin is substantially
`increased by estrogens and somewhat reduced by
`p rogestogens. 1r,. u; The effect of NET containing OC
`on SHBG is predominantly estrogenic rather than
`progestogen ic. A levonorgestrel (LEV)-containing
`OC has been demonstrated to cause a decrease in
`SHBG capacity. 17 "Higher" dose OCs have been
`shown to increase SHBG in hirsute women. 111 Tal(cid:173)
`bert and Sloan I!J have shown " low dose" NET-con(cid:173)
`ta ining OCs significantly
`increase SHBG
`in
`women with polycystic ovarian d isease. A shor t
`term study (20 days) of normal women demon(cid:173)
`strated that low-dose EE2 (30 Jig) a lone signifi(cid:173)
`cantly increases S HBG.~u Our data showing a sig(cid:173)
`nificant rise in SHBG is consistent with this earlier
`work, and demonstrates for the first time that, in
`normal women on monophasic J)Ieparations, these
`a lterations persist throughout the course of ther(cid:173)
`apy when followed for as long as 9 months.
`Dehydroepiandrosterone su lfate has been shown
`to be an important marl<er for adrenal androgen
`secretion in women. 21 The administration of estro(cid:173)
`gen alone results in either no change or an increase
`in DHEAS levels.t2 .t~• Klove7 studied the efl:"ect of
`low-dose OCs o n serum concentration of DHEAS
`in six nonhirsute women and noted that OCs con (cid:173)
`taining NET but not LEV have a suppressive effect
`on adrenal androgen secretion. Our study confirms
`this finding with an NET-containing low-dose OC.
`A significant decline in DHEAS levels is seen and
`maintained for at least 9 months. The mechanism
`for this suppression is not established, although it
`has been suggested that plasma adrenocorti(cid:173)
`cotropic hormone (ACTH) levels a re decreased
`by 0Cs. 11
`Jung-Hotrman and Kuhl2·' noted a significant
`suppression of nonprotein bound T d uring treat(cid:173)
`ment with both a low-dose monophasic OC and a
`triphasil preparation in normal women. Low dose
`OCs have been shown to suppress T in hirsute
`2
`1 Our study is
`women with chronic anovulation.s· 18


`the first long term study in normal women showing
`a significant Sllppression of protein bound T with
`
`a low-close monophasic OC that is maintained to
`9 months. Taken with the significant decrease in
`SHBG, the suppression would appear to be clini(cid:173)
`cally significant.
`Wild et al.2r; studied 15 hirsute women before a nd
`after the completion of one cycle of a n OC contain (cid:173)
`ing 2 mg of NET and 100 1-1g of mestranol. Andro(cid:173)
`stenedione was reduced by 47%. A reduction in the
`magnitude of the diurnal change in A synchronous
`with cor tisol as well as a reduction in the A re(cid:173)
`sponse to ACTH was seen. As noted previously,
`adrenal suppression seems to be dependent on the
`type of progestin. The low-dose OC used in this
`study contains ha lf the progestin content that was
`used by Wild et al. 25 Our data in normal women
`show no change in A. Taken together with the pre(cid:173)
`viously published data2
`'' on hirsute women, we sug(cid:173)
`gest there may be a dose dependent suppression of
`A which fails to reach significance at the low dose
`used in our study. The differing results may be ex(cid:173)
`pla ined by the different doses and populations (hir(cid:173)
`sute versus normal).
`In conclusion, our data document that a low-dose
`OC containing 35 pg of EE2 and 1 mg of NET re(cid:173)
`duces gonadotropin levels in nonhirsute, normally
`cycling women when compared with the early fol(cid:173)
`licular phase. A differential effect is seen with FSH
`being more consistently suppressed than LH. Sex
`hormone-binding globulin is consistently stimu(cid:173)
`lated by the low-dose OC. Our results show a sig(cid:173)
`nificant decline in DHEAS levels that is sustained
`to 9 months. Serum total T is suppressed, but an(cid:173)
`drostenedione did not significantly vary from base(cid:173)
`line obtained in the early follicular phase. This
`large, prospective, longitudinal study provides im(cid:173)
`portant normative data for a commonly used
`monophasic low-dose oral contraceptive.
`
`Aclmowleclgmenls. We thank Edward E. Wallach, M.D. and
`Joseph Mortola, M.D. for their ki nd review of the manuscript
`and Mr. Paul Shragg of the General Clinical Research Center
`for the stm.istical analysis.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`J. Inman WHV11, Vessey MP. Westerholme B , Engelund A:
`Thromboembolic disease and the steroidal content of oral
`contraceptives: a report to the committee on safety of
`drugs. Br Med J 2:203, 1970
`2. Mays ET, Ch rislOJ>herson WM, Mahr MM, Williams HC:
`Hepatic chnnges in young women ingesting contraceptive
`steroids. JAMA 235:730, 1976
`3. Spellacy vVM: A review of carbohydrate metabolism and
`the oral contracepf ive. Am J Obstet Gynecol l04 :448, 1969
`
`38
`
`M u rph y ct a l.
`
`Co11lrocl!pt.ivc.~. gonadotropins. ondro.qens
`
`Fertility and Sterility
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1014
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 4
`
`

`

`4. F'irsch IR, Frank J: Oral contraceptives and blood pressure.
`JAMA 237:2499, 1977
`5. Ory HW: Association of oral contraceptive and myocardial
`infarct.ion: a review. JANIA 237:2619, 1977
`G. Wahl P, Walden C, Knopp R , Hoovor J. Wallace R, Heiss
`G, Refkind 8: Effect of estrogen/progestin potency on
`lipid/lipoprotein cholesterol. N Eng J :vied 308:862, 1983
`7. Klove KL, Roy S, Lobo RA: The effect of different com.ra(cid:173)
`ceptive treatments on the serum concentration of dehy(cid:173)
`droepiandrosterone sulfate. Contraception 29:319, 198-l
`S. Wiebe RH, Morris CV: Effect of an oral contraceptive on
`adrenal and ovarian a ndrogenic steroids. Obstet Gynecol
`63:12, 1984
`9. Midgley AR: Radioimmunoassay: a method for hCG and
`hLH. Endocrinology 79:10, 1966
`10. Midgley AR: Radioimmunoassay of human follicle stimu(cid:173)
`lating hormone {hFSH). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 27:195,
`1967
`11. Carr DR, Porker CR, Madden JD, MacDonald PC, Porter
`J C: Plasma levels of adrenocorticotropin nnd cortisol in
`women receiving oral contraceptive steroid treatment. J
`Clin Endocrinol Metab 49:346, 1979
`12. Dericks-Tnn JS, Schneider K, Taubert HD: The mecha(cid:173)
`nism of actio n of 11 new low-dosed combined o ral contracep(cid:173)
`tive. Arch Gy necol 229:107, 1980
`13. Franchi mont P, Legros J, Meurice J: Elfectofseveral estro(cid:173)
`gens on serum gonadot ropin levels in postmenopausal
`women. Horm Me tab Res •1:288, 1972
`14. Elstein M, Briston PC, Jenkins M, Kirk D, Miller H:
`Effects of o low dose oestrogen on serum gonadotropin lev(cid:173)
`els in postmenopausal women. Horm Metab Res -1:288,
`1972
`15. Anderson DC: Sex hormone binding globulin. Clin Endo(cid:173)
`crinol (OxO. 3:69, 1974
`
`16. Granger LR. Roy S, Mishell DR: Changes in unbound sex
`steroids and sex hormone binding globulin-binding capac(cid:173)
`ity during oral and vRginal progestogen administration. Am
`J Obstet Gynecoll44:578, 1982
`17. Civon8JR, Anderson RN, Wi~er \VL, Um$lOt ES, F ish SA:
`The elfectivcness of two oral contraceptives in suppressing
`plasma androstenedione, testosterone, LH, and F'SH, and
`in stimulating plnsmn testosterone-binding capacity in hir(cid:173)
`sute women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 124:333, 1979
`18. Easterling WE, Talbert LM, Potter HD: Serum testoster(cid:173)
`one levels in the polycystic ovnry syndrome. Am J Obstet
`Gynccol 120:385, !974
`19. Talbert LM, Slonn C: The cfrect of n low-dose oral contra(cid:173)
`ceptive on serum testosterone levels in polycystic ovary dis·
`ease. Obstet Gynecoi 53:G94, 1979
`20. Limpongsnnurnl< S. J enkins N, Fothcrby I<: Effect of con(cid:173)
`tracept-ive stcr·oids on serum levels of sex hormone binding
`globulin and cneruloplnsmin. Curr Med Res and Opin 7:
`185, l981
`21. Lobo RA , Paul W L, Cocbclsmun U: Serum levels of dehy(cid:173)
`droepiondrostcrone sulfnlc in t,tynecologic endocrinopathy
`and infertility. Obstct Gynecol 57:607, 1981
`22. Anderson DC, Yen SSC: Ellects of estrogens on odrenul3-
`hydroxystcroid dehydrogennsc in ovariectomized women. J
`Clin l~ndocrinol Mcl.tlb ,13:561, 1976
`23. Lobo RA, Goebelsmnnn U, Brenner PF, Mishell DR: The
`elfecls of estrogen on udrennl androgens in oophorecto(cid:173)
`mi:t.ed women. Am J Oustct Gynccol H2:471, 1982
`24. Jung-HoiTmann C, Kuhl H: Divergent efrects of two low(cid:173)
`dose oml contraceptives on se:.: hormone-binding globulin
`nncl free testosterone. Am ,J Obstet Gynccol 156:199, 1987
`25. Wild RA, Umstot ES, Andersen HN, Givens J R: Adrenal
`function in hirsutism. II. ElfccL of an o rnl contraceptive. J
`Clin 8ndocrinol Metob 5~:676, 1982
`
`~ I
`'
`
`Vol. 53, No. 1, January 1990
`
`Murphy et al. Contraceptiu(!S, gonadotropins. androgens
`
`39
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1014
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket