throbber
EXHIBIT 1005
`
`EXHIBIT 1005
`
`

`

`United States Patent
`Hodgen
`
`[19]
`
`11111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 1111111111 1111111111111111111 1111
`US005552394A
`[1 1] Patent Number:
`(45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,552,394
`Sep.3, 1996
`
`[54] LOW DOSE ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
`WITH LESS BREAKTHROUGH BLEEDING
`Al'ill SUSTAINED EFFICACY
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Gary D. Hodgen, Norfolk, Va.
`
`[73] Assignee: The Medical College of Hampton
`Roads, Norfolk, Va.
`
`[21) Appl. No.: 279,300
`
`[22) Filed:
`
`Jul. 22, 1994
`
`Int. CL." ..................................................... A61K 31/56
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl . .......................... 514/178; 514/170; 514/182;
`514/843
`[58] Field of Search ..................................... 5141170, 178,
`5141182, 843
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,932,635
`5,010,070
`5,098,714
`5,262,408
`
`1/1976 Segre ...................................... 4241239
`4/J991 Boissonneault ......................... 514/171
`311992 Wright .................................... 424/473
`llll993 Bcrgink ................................... 514/182
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`253607
`
`lll988 European Pal. Off ..
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`CA 76:30782, Craft et al., 1971.
`Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, Edited by James E. F.
`Reynolds, pp. 2003-2004, Thirtieth Edition. (1993).
`AHFS Drug Information 33, p. 2348. (1993).
`Drug Information for the Health Care Professional, vol. I ,
`USP DI 1993, 13th Edition, Chapter 50.
`
`Primary Examiner- Kimberly Jordan
`Attorney, Agent, or Fimz- Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen,
`LLP
`
`[57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A method of female contraception which is characterized by
`a reduced incidence of breakthrough bleeiling after the first
`cycle involves monophasicly administering a combination
`of estrogen and progestin for 23- 25 consecutive days of a 28
`day cycle in which the daily amounts of estrogen and
`progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 meg of ethinyl
`estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone acetate,
`respectively and in which the weight ratio of estrogen to
`progestin is at least 1 :45 calculated as ethinyl estradiol to
`norethindrone acetate.
`
`12 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 3
`
`

`

`5,552,394
`
`1
`LOW DOSE ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
`WITH LESS BREAKTHROUGH BLEEDING
`AND SUSTAINED EFFICACY
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The ovarian/menstrual cycle is a complex event charac(cid:173)
`terized by an estrogen rich follicular phase and, after ovu(cid:173)
`lation, a progesterone rich luteal phase. Each has a duration
`of approximately 14 days resulting in an intermenstrual
`interval of about 28 days. The endometrial tissue responds to
`the changes in hormonal milieu.
`The onset of menstruation is the beginning of a new
`menstrual cycle and is counted as day 1. During a span of 15
`about 5 to 7 days, the superficial layers of the endometrium,
`which grew and developed during the antecedent ovarian/
`menstrual cycle, are sloughed because demise of the corpus
`luteum in the non-fertile menstrual cycle is associated with
`a Joss of progesterone secretion. Ovarian follicular matura- 20
`tion occurs progressively resulting in a rise in the circulating
`levels of estrogen, which in turn leads to new endometrial
`proliferation_
`The dominant ovarian follicle undergoes ovulation at
`mid-cycle, generally between menstrual cycle days 12 to 16 25
`and is converted from a predominantly estrogen source to a
`predominantly progesterone source (the corpus luteum). The
`increasing level of progesterone in the blood converts the
`proliferative endometrium to a secretory phase in which the
`tissue proliferation bas promptly abated, leading to the 30
`formation of endometrial glands or organs. When the ovu(cid:173)
`lated oocyte is viably fertilized and continues its progressive
`embryonic cleavage, the secretory endometrium and the
`conceptus can interact to bring about implantation (nida(cid:173)
`tion), beginning about 6 to 8 days after fertilization.
`If an ongoing pregnancy is to be established via implan(cid:173)
`tation, the embryo wiJI attach and burrow into the secretory
`endometrium and begin to produce human chorionic gona(cid:173)
`dotropin (HCG). The HCG in tum stimulates extended
`corpus Iuteum function, i.e. the progesterone production 40
`remains elevated, and menses does not occur in the fertile
`menstrual cycle. Pregnancy is then established.
`In the non-fertile menstrual cycle, the waning level of
`progesterone in the blood causes the endometrial tissue to be 45
`sloughed. This starts a subsequent menstrual cycle.
`Because endometrial proliferation serves to prepare the
`uterus for an impending pregnancy, manipulation of hor(cid:173)
`mones and of the uterine environment can provide contra(cid:173)
`ception. For example, estrogens are known to decrease 50
`follicle stimulating hormone secretion by feedback inhibi(cid:173)
`tion. Under certain circumstances, estrogens can also inhibit
`luteinizing hormone secretion, once again by negative feed(cid:173)
`back. Under normal circumstances, the spike of circulating
`estrogen found just prior to ovulation induces the surge of 55
`gonadotropic hormones that occurs just prior to and result(cid:173)
`ing in ovulation. High doses of estrogen immediately post(cid:173)
`coitally also can prevent conception probably due to inter(cid:173)
`ference with implantation.
`Progestins can also provide contraception. Endogenous 60
`progesterone after estrogen is responsible for the progesta(cid:173)
`tional changes of the endometrium and the cyclic changes of
`cells and tissue in the cervix and the vagina. Administration
`of progestin makes the cervical mucus thick, tenacious and
`cellular whlch is believed to impede spermatozoal transport. 65
`Administration of progestin also inhibits luteinizing hor(cid:173)
`mone secretion and blocks ovulation in humans.
`
`2
`The most prevalent form of oral contraception is a pill that
`combines both an estrogen and a progestin, a so-called
`combined oral contraceptive preparation.
`Alternatively, there are contraceptive preparations that
`5 comprise progestin only. However, the progestin-only
`preparations have a more varied spectrum of side effects
`than do the combined preparations, especially more break(cid:173)
`through bleeding. As a result, the combined preparations are
`the preferred oral contraceptives in use today (Sheth et al.,
`10 Contraception 25:243, 1982).
`Whereas the conventional 21 day pill packs with a 7 day
`"pill free" or placebo interval worked well when oral con(cid:173)
`traceptives were of higher dosage, as the doses have come
`down, for both the estrogen and progestin components,
`bleeding problems have increased in frequency, especially in
`the early months of oral contraceptive usc, but even persis-
`tently so in some patients.
`Since the advent of combined estrogen-progestin medi(cid:173)
`cations as oral contraceptives, there bas been a steady
`downward adjustment of the daily estrogen dosage. Con(cid:173)
`currently, where exposure to the progestin component has
`also been lowered, reduced androgenicity has remained an
`ongoing priority. Together these adaptions in formulation
`have been presented in a variety of regimens, both monopha(cid:173)
`sic and multiphasic. Each have their own advantages and
`disadvantages. All-in-all, today' s oral contraceptives are
`much safer with regard to the incidence and severity of
`estrogen-linked clotting disorders as well as the suggested
`cumulative impact of more "lipid friendly" progestins that
`maintain the potentially advantageous high density lipopro(cid:173)
`tein cholesterol levels in Circulation.
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,531 teaches a triphasic regimen in
`which each phase uses about 20-40 meg ethinyl estradiol,
`phases 1 and 3 use 0.3-0.8 norethindrone and phase 2
`35 doubles the amount of the norethindrone. These three phases
`consume 21 days of a 28 day cycle. European published
`application 0 226 279 states that this regimen is associated
`with a hlgh incidence of breakthrough bleeding and substi-
`tutes a three phase oral contraceptive regimen using a
`relatively low amount of ethinyl estradiol (10-50 1-1g) and a
`relatively high amount of norethindrone acetate (0.5- 1.5
`mg) in each phase provided that the amount of estrogen in
`any two phases is never the same. A "rest" phase of about 7
`days is used in this regimen.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,098,714 teaches an osmotic, oral dosage
`form. One "pill" is administered per day but the adminis(cid:173)
`tration is, in effect, polyphasic. The dosage form is con(cid:173)
`structed such that it provides an initial pulse delivery of
`estrogen and progestin followed by prolonged delivery of
`estrogen.
`European published patent application 0 253 607
`describes a monophasic contraceptive preparation contain(cid:173)
`ing units having 0.008-0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol and
`0.025-0.1 mg of desogestrel (or equivalent) and a regimen
`where the preparation is administered over a 23- 25 day
`period, preferably 24 days, followed by a 2-5 day pill-free
`period. The object of this regimen is to provide hormonal
`replacement therapy and contraceptive protection for the
`pre-menopausal woman in need thereof by supplying a low
`dose of an estrogen combined with a "very low dose of a
`progestogen."
`In 1989, the accumulating data from the evolution of oral
`contraceptive pill formulations containing only 20-35 J.lg of
`estrogen per day spurred the Food and Drug Administra(cid:173)
`tion's Fertility and Maternal Health Drugs Advisory Com-
`mittee to recommend indication of low dose oral contracep-
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 4
`
`

`

`5,552,394
`
`3
`lives for healthy, non-smoking women even during the
`perimenopausal years, such as, for instance, ages 35-50. In
`Japan, oral contraceptives are being evaluated for safety and
`efficacy, as well as social acceptability, for the first time.
`In establishing a estrogen-progestin regimen for oral
`contraceptives, two principal issues must be confronted.
`First, efficacy must be maintained and second, there must be
`avoidance of further erosion in the control of endometrial
`bleeding. In general, even the lowest dose oral contraceptive
`products commercially available have demonstrated efficacy
`but the overall instances of bleeding control problems has
`increased as the doses were reduced, as manifest both in
`breakthrough bleeding (untimely flow or spotting) or with(cid:173)
`drawal amenorrhea during the "pill free" week (expected
`menses).
`lt is the object of the present invention to provide a new
`estrogen-progestin combination and regimen for oral con(cid:173)
`traceptive usc which maintains the efficacy and provides
`enhanced control of endometrial bleeding. This and other
`objects of the invention will become apparent to those
`skilled in the art from the following detailed description.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates the circulating levels of LH, FSH,
`estradiol and progesterone among five primates receiving
`the traditional regimen of 21 treatment days, plus 7 "pill
`free" days.
`FIG. 2 illustrates the circulating levels of LH, FSH,
`estradiol and progesterone among five primates receiving
`the regimen of 24 treatment days, plus 3 "pill free" days.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`25
`
`This invention relates to a method of female contraception
`which is characterized by a reduced incidence of break(cid:173)
`through bleeding. More particularly, it relates to a method of
`female contraception which involves monophasicly admin(cid:173)
`istering a combination of estrogen and progestin for 23--25
`consecutive days of a 28 day cycle in which the daily
`amounts of the estrogen and progesterone are equivalent to
`about 1-35 meg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025- 10 mg
`of norethindrone acetate, respectively, and in which the
`weight ratio of estrogen to progestin is at least 1:45 calcu(cid:173)
`lated as cthinyl estradiol to norethindrone acetate. Surpris- 45
`ingly, there is a reduced incidence of breakthrough bleeding
`after the first cycle. This reduced incidence is not manifest
`during the first cycle.
`
`4
`Other estrogens vary in potency from ethinyl estradiol.
`For example, 30 meg of cthinyl estradiol is roughly equiva(cid:173)
`lent to 60 meg of mestranol or 2,000 mg of 17 ~-estradiol.
`Likewise, other progestins vary in potency from norethin-
`5 drone acetate. Thus, 3.5 mg of norethindrone acetate is
`roughly equivalent to 1 mg of levonorgestrel or desogestrcl
`and 3-ketodesogestrel and about 0.7 mg of gastodene. The
`values given above are for the ethinyl estradiol and the
`norethindrone and if a different estrogen or progestin is
`10 employed, an adjustment in the amount based on the relative
`potency should be made. The correlations in potency
`between the various estrogens and progestins are known.
`Other useable estrogens include the esters of estradiol and
`ethinyl estradiol such as the acetate, valerate or benzoate,
`15 and conjugated equine estrogens. The estrogen is adminis(cid:173)
`tered in the conventional manner by any route where it is
`active, for instance orally or transdermaJiy. Most estrogens
`are orally active and that route of administration is therefore
`preferred. Accordingly, admirtistration forms can be tablets,
`20 dragees, capsules or pills which contain the estrogen (and
`preferably the progestin) and a suitable pharmaceutically
`acceptable carrier.
`Pharmaceutical formulations containing the progestin and
`a suitable carrier can be solid dosage forms which includes
`tablets, capsules, cachets, pellets, pills, powders or granules;
`topical dosage forms which includes solutions, powders,
`fluid emulsions, fluid suspensions, semi-solids, ointments,
`pastes, creams, gels or jellies and foams; and parenteral
`dosage forms which includes solutions, suspensions, emul-
`30 sions or dry powder comprising an effective amount of
`progestin as taught in this invention. It is known in the art
`that the active ingredient, the progestin, can be contained in
`such formulations in addition to pharmaceutically accept(cid:173)
`able diluents, fillers, disintegrants, binders, lubricants, sur-
`35 factants, hydrophobic vehicles, water soluble vehicles,
`emulsifiers, buffers, humectants, moisturi.zcrs, solubilizers,
`preservatives and the like. The means and methods for
`administration are known in the an and an artisan can refer
`to various pharmacologic references for guidance. For
`40 example, " Modem Pharmaceutics", Banker & Rhodes, Mar(cid:173)
`cel Dekker, Inc. 1979; "Goodman & Gilman's The Pharma(cid:173)
`ceutical Basis of Therapeutics", 6th Edition, MacMillan
`Publishing Co., New York 1980 can be consulted.
`The pharmaceutical formulations may be provided in kit
`form containing at least about 23, and preferably 28 tablets,
`intended for ingestion on successive days of the menstrual
`cycle. Preferably administration is daily for 24 days using
`tablets contain the both the estrogen and the progestin and
`then for 4 d!iYS with placebo.
`In order to further illustrate the present invention, specific
`examples are set forth below. It will be appreciated, how(cid:173)
`ever, that these examples arc illustrative only and are not
`intended to limit the scope of the invention. They also
`55 demonstrate the outstanding results achieved when the estro(cid:173)
`gen dose is very low, the estrogenlprogentin ratio is at least
`1:45 and the treatment is monphasic for 23 to 25 days.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
`
`50
`
`In accordance with the present invention, a women in
`need of contraception is administered a combined dosage
`form of estrogen and progestin monophasicly for 23 to 25
`consecutive days of a 28 day cycle, preferably 24 days of the
`cycle, in which the daily amounts of estrogen and progestin
`are equivalent to about 5-35 meg of ethinyl estradiol and
`about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively,
`and in which the weight ratio of estrogen to progesterone is
`at least I :45 calculated as ethinyl estradiol to norethindrone 60
`acetate.
`The preferred estrogen and progestins are ethinyl estradiol
`and norethindrone acetate although other estrogens and
`progestins can be employed. The weight ratio of these two
`active ingredients is at least 1:45 and preferably at least 1:50. 65
`The preferable amount of the norethindrone acetate is about
`0.5-1.5 mg.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`A study was carried out at the Eastern Virginia Medical
`School which maintains a fully accredited animal research
`facility which complies through its animal care and use
`committee with the review standards set forth in the
`National Instirute of Health's "Guide for Care and Use of
`Laboratory Animals", the Public Health Services' "Prin(cid:173)
`ciples for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", and the
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 5
`
`

`

`5,552,394
`
`10
`
`15
`
`5
`United States Department of Agriculture's Implementation
`Regulations of the 1985 Amendments for the Animal Wel(cid:173)
`fare Act.
`Ten adult female cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fasicu(cid:173)
`Iaris) having regular presumably ovulatory menstrual cycles 5
`(28.9±3.1 days for the month prior to study entry) were
`selected. Their duration of spontaneous menses was 3.4±1.4
`days. Mean body weight of the monkeys was 4.9±1.1 kg
`(X±SEM). They were housed individually in a controlled
`environment (12 hours of light and 23° C.). Their diet was
`a commercial primate food (Purina, St. Louis, Mo.) with
`water ad libitum.
`The monkeys were divided at random into two groups
`(N=5 each). The studies began with spontaneous menstrua(cid:173)
`tion in a pretreatment control cycle. At the onset of the next
`spontaneous menses, alternatively, they were assigned to
`receive on cycle day one an ultra low dose oral contraceptive
`for either 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 non-treatment
`days or 24 consecutive days, followed by a 4 non-treatment 20
`days. These regimens were continued through three treat(cid:173)
`ment cycles. The study concluded with each group of
`primates being followed during a post-treatment spontane(cid:173)
`ous ovarian menstrual cycle.
`Femoral blood was collected daily and the serum frozen 25
`for subsequent RIA of estradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH
`in the pretreatment and post-treatment cycles and every 3rd
`day during all three treatment cycles, except daily through
`the "pill free" interval. Bleeding profiles were kept by daily
`vaginal swabs, indicating spontaneous menstruation, with- 30
`drawal bleeding, breakthrough bleeding, or withdrawal
`amenorrhea. Breakthrough bleeding was defined as detect(cid:173)
`able blood in the vagina outside of the first 8 days after the
`last dose of oral contraceptive or the onset of spontaneous
`menses in non-treatment cycles.
`Since the objective was to test an ultra low dose oral
`contraceptive, the medication used was adjusted to fit the
`smaller (than human) body weight of these laboratory pri(cid:173)
`mates. The dose of ethinyl estradiol was 1.2 flg/day, while
`the dose of norethindrone acetate was 0.06 mg/day. This 40
`"in-house" reformulation was achieved by grinding to pow(cid:173)
`der a commercially available monophasic pill (Loestrin
`l/20, Parke Davis, Morris Plains, N.J. ), which originally
`contained 1 mg of norethindrone acetate and 20 flg of ethinyl
`estradiol per tablet, contained in a conventional 21 day pack 45
`along with 7 iron-containing placebos.
`In terms of comparison to human dose equivalents, the
`daily dose received by the monkeys (with a monkey's body
`weight about 5 kg and a woman's at 50 kg) was about 12 f.l&
`of ethinyl estradiol and 0.6 mg of norethindrone acetate.
`Thus, this ultra low dose oral contraceptive formulation
`presented a 40% reduction in daily estrogen-progestin expo(cid:173)
`sure as compared to one of the lowest estrogen dose com(cid:173)
`bination oral contraceptives commercially available today in
`America or Europe. Taking into account that when a 24 day
`ultra low dose regimen was used, versus the traditional 21 + 7
`day protocol, that there would be 3 more treatment days each
`cycle and 39 more doses on an annualized basis, still the
`exposure to medication was reduced by more than 30%
`yearly.
`Differences between group results calculated as the means
`and standard errors, were compared using the F statistic,
`testing a P<0.05 level of significance.
`Table I below summarizes the intermenstrual intervals for
`both groups, including the spontaneous cycles (pretreatment
`and post treatment) and the three treatment cycles.
`
`6
`
`TABLE I
`
`Comparntive Data Using Ultra Low Dose OC Regimens
`lntcnnenstrual Intervals (:X ± SEM)
`
`Spontaneous
`Cycles•
`
`Treat·
`
`mente
`
`Days
`1-21
`Days
`1-24
`
`Pre-
`treat-
`
`Posureat-
`
`Treatment C~cles•
`
`ment
`
`men I
`
`29.3 ±
`2.4
`28.6±
`2.5
`
`30.1 ±
`3.0
`29.1 ±
`2.9
`
`2
`
`3
`
`24.4 ± 2.o•
`
`27:6 ± 2.5
`
`28.1 ± 3.3
`
`26.0 ±3.1
`
`27.8 ± 2.1
`
`27.2 ± 2.2
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 6
`
`"Menses length was 4.2 ± 0.8 days in spontaneous cycles
`•Menses length was 2.8 ± 0.5 days in treatment cycles; p < 0.05, significantly
`less than a
`~ = 6 monkeys in all groups, except that one monkey was removed from the
`study early in the treatment cycle 3 due to an infection
`dlntermenstrual interval significantly Jess than treatment cycles 2 and 3 (p <
`0.05)
`Except for the initial treatment cycle which was only
`24.4±1.2 days in association with withdrawal of the oral
`contraceptive after 21 treatment days, all groups had mean
`intermenstrual intervals of about 26 to 30 days.
`Regarding non-menstrual and non-withdrawal bleeding,
`untimely breakthrough bleeding occurred on 37, 27 and 27
`days, respectively, for the five monkeys on the 21 day
`regimen versus 36, 18 and 11 times for females on the 24 day
`therapy, cycles one through three. During spontaneous
`cycles in the pre- or post -treatment intervals, breakthrough
`bleeding was observed on only 16 occasions overall (4
`cycles) for both groups. Statistical analysis revealed that
`untimely bleeding was significantly higher in both treatment
`35 groups than in spontaneous cycles (p<O.OS). More impor(cid:173)
`tantly, monkeys receiving their ultra low dose oral contra(cid:173)
`ceptive regimen for 24 days manifest significantly less (p
`<0.05) breakthrough bleeding in their second and third
`treatment cycle than females in the 21 day protocol. This
`trend was not IN evidence in the first treatment cycle
`(p>O.OS).
`Note that withdrawal amenorrhea occurred in two mon(cid:173)
`keys, one in each treatment group, both at the end of the
`second treatment cycle.
`In Table I, among the footnotes (a and b) notice that the
`duration of menses was significantly Jess (p<0.05) after
`administration of both treatments versus spontaneous
`menses. Treatment groups did not differ in this regard.
`FIG. 1 illustrates the circulating levels of LH, FSH,
`estradiol and progesterone among the five primates receiv(cid:173)
`ing the traditional regimen of 21 treatment days, plus 7 "pill
`free" days. In contrasting these hormonal patterns to those in
`FIG. 2, wherein monkeys were on an extended 24+4 day
`treatment protocol, three differences in serum hormonal
`level are apparent. Despite some instances of substantial
`individualism of response, the mean values illustrated (±one
`SEM) reveal significantly greater elevations of estradiol,
`FSH and LH whenever 7 day "pill free" intervals occurred.
`Notice that the circulating levels of estradiol in particular
`were highest on the 5th, 6th and 7th "pill free" days. Indeed,
`peak serum estradiol averaged 52±14 pglml versus 31±9
`pglml for the 21 versus 24 day treatment groups, respec(cid:173)
`tively (p<0.05), across all treatment cycles.
`Even so, that both regimens were apparently efficacious in
`65 blocking ovulation is indicated by the rapid truncation of
`these transient "pill free" associated elevations of serum
`pituitary gonadotropins and estradiol as soon as the medi-
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`

`

`5,552,394
`
`8
`
`7
`cation was resumed. Also, serum progesterone remained
`near the baseline throughout the treatment cycles for all
`monkeys.
`Pre- and post-treatment cycles were essentially indistin(cid:173)
`guishable, irrespective of treatment assignments.
`The data presented indicate that in this primate model
`ultra low doses of norethindrone acetate in combination with
`cthinyl estradiol-
`that is, 40% less daily (on a body weight
`basis) than is commercially available now-reliably pre(cid:173)
`vented ovulation. Even using the extended 24 day treatment 10
`regimen, total annual exposure to the medication would
`decline by more than 30% compared to existing formula(cid:173)
`tions now in clinical use.
`
`EXAMPLES 2-5
`
`The example 1 procedure is repeated using the following
`combinations of estrogen and progestin:
`
`Example
`
`Estrogen
`
`Progestin
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`mestranol
`
`17-beta·
`estradiol
`ethinyl
`estradiol
`mestranol
`
`lcvo·
`norgcstrel
`3·kC!O·
`desogcstrcl
`dcsogcstrel
`
`gastodonc
`
`Treatment
`Days
`
`24
`
`25
`
`23
`
`24
`
`20
`
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method of female contraception which is character(cid:173)
`ized by a reduced incidence of breakthrough bleeding after
`the first cycle which comprises monophasicly administering
`5 a combination of estrogen and progestin for 23- 25 consecu(cid:173)
`tive days of a 28 day cycle in which the daily amounts of
`estrogen and progestin are equivalent to aboutl-35 meg of
`ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone
`acetate, respectively, and in which the weight ratio of
`estrogen to progestin is at least I :45 calculated as ethinyl
`estradiol to norethindrone acetate.
`2. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of
`progestin is equivalent to 0.5-0.75 mg of norethindrone
`15 acetate.
`3. The method of claim 2 in which the weight ratio is at
`least 1:50.
`4. The method of claim 3 in which the combination is
`administered for 24 days of the 28 day cycle.
`5. The method of claim 4 in which the estrogen is etbinyl
`estradiol.
`6. The method of claim 5 in which the progestin is
`norethindrone acetate.
`7. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of
`25 progestin is equivalent to 0.5- 1.5 mg of norethindrone
`acetate.
`8. The method of claim 1 in which the weight ratio is al
`least 1:50.
`9. The method of claim 1 in which the combination is
`administered for 24 days of the 28 day cycle.
`10. The method of claim 1 in which the estrogen is etbinyl
`estradiol.
`11. The method of claim 1 in which the progestin is
`norethindrone acetate.
`12. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of
`estrogen is up to 30 meg of ethinyl estradiol.
`
`Application of the compounds, compositions and methods 30
`of the present invention for the medical or pharmaceutical
`uses described can be accomplished by any clinical, medi(cid:173)
`cal, and pharmaceutical methods and techniques as are
`presently or prospectively known to those skilled in the art.
`It will therefore be appreciated that the various embodiments 35
`which have been described above are intended to illustrate
`the invention and various changes and modifications can be
`made in the inventive method without departing from the
`spirit and scope thereof.
`
`* * * * *
`
`Petitioner Exhibit 1005
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,704,984
`Page 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket