throbber
AMNIOTIC ARTHROPLASTY FOR TUBERCULOSIS OF THE HIP
`
`A PRELIMINARY CLINICAL STUDY
`
`G. K. VISHWAKARMA. A. K. KHARE
`
`From Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi
`
`Arthroplasty of the hip using an interposed multi-layered cap of amniotic membrane is reported in 28
`patients with tuberculous arthritis. The disease had been present from one to seven years, and five patients
`had multiple discharging sinuses. Follow-up was from 30 to 46 months.
`Amniotic tissue caused no inflammatory reaction, or obvious rejection, and 25 patients were free of
`symptoms, with a good range of movement and a stable joint. The three failures were caused by dislocation,
`fracture of the femoral neck and extra-articular bone formation respectively. Amniotic arthroplasty seems to
`be capable of providing a painless, mobile and stable joint in patients with tuberculosis of the hip.
`cal application of fetal membranes presents interesting
`The hip joint is important. not only for walking, but also
`for the squatting, kneeling or bowing required by custom
`possibilities and there have been more than 20 articles on
`and tradition in Indian society. Tuberculosis of the hip
`the subject since 1970. though reports on their use in
`has crippled many patients in Asia and elsewhere. New
`joints are rare. Davis ( 191 0) first reported the use of fetal
`antituberculous drugs have made direct surgery possible
`membrane for skin covering, while Stern (1913) and
`and this has varied from debridement or excision of the
`Sabella ( 1913) used amniotic membrane for burns and
`ulcerated skin. They both reported no infection, relief
`joint to arthrodesis.
`In the West, tuberculosis has declined in the past
`from pain and an increased rate of epithelialisation.
`few decades. and arthrodesis has provided one satisfac(cid:173)
`Brindeau (1934) and Burger (1938) used amnion in
`tory solution for the infected hip. Few attempts have
`forming an artificial vagina. De Rotth ( 1940) reported its
`been made to provide painfree movement and stability of
`successful use in conjunctival defects and Douglas ( 1952)
`investigated fetal membrane as an allograft for large
`the joint. Wilkinson's (1957) joint debridement pro(cid:173)
`wounds. In 1962. Massee eta/. confirmed that fetal mem(cid:173)
`cedure failed in adults and was only partially successful
`branes produced few, if any, adhesions when used in the
`in children. The Girdlestone excision arthroplasty sacri(cid:173)
`ficed stability for movement but resulted in a grotesque
`abdomen as a replacement for parietal peritoneum.
`Trelford et a/. ( 1975) used amnion as a biological dress(cid:173)
`gait and marked limb shortening.
`ing for full
`thickness wounds while Ninman and
`Katayama. Itami and Marumo (1962) attempted to
`retain movement in tuberculosis of the hip. They com(cid:173)
`Shoemaker ( 1975) recommended amniotic membrane
`for the treatment of burns. Volkov in 1973 reported the
`bined joint debridement with the interposition of fascia
`use of amniotic membrane in congenital dislocation of
`or OMS membrane (woven fabric catgut compressed
`the hip.
`into a thin membrane and chemically strengthened by
`immersion in chromic solution). The results were not
`Vishwakarma, Krishnan and Khare ( 1980) reported
`experiments on the interposition of amniotic membranes
`encouraging. and the procedure was given up. Inter(cid:173)
`position of soft tissues had been widely employed in
`in dog joints, artificially made arthritic by destruction of
`the articular cartilage and complete synovectomy and
`non-infective conditions and included the use of fascia
`capsulectomy. The findings were interesting: the range of
`(Campbell 1924). skin (Kallio 1957) and peritoneum
`movement achieved was comparable to normal, a cleft in
`results were
`(Kuznetsov 1962). Persistently poor
`the plane of movement appeared in the multi-layered
`obtained and the procedures were discarded.
`amniotic cap after two months, and there was progress(cid:173)
`Biological tissue would be ideal for interposition
`ive formation of fibrous tissue in the peripheral layers.
`arthroplasty, provided that it did not elicit any host reac(cid:173)
`Functional metaplasia was apparent from the appear(cid:173)
`tion and was capable of functional adaptation. The clini-
`ance of fibrocartilage which indicated adaptation to
`stress. Another finding was that synovial-like tissue lined
`the walls of the cleft; its origin remained uncertain. There
`were no
`rejection phenomena or
`inflammatory
`responses.
`This animal study encouraged the trial of interposi(cid:173)
`tion arthroplasty of the hip for tuberculosis, using a cap
`
`G. K. Vishwakarma. MS. FICS. Professor and Director
`A. K. Khare. MS. Senior Resident
`Central Institute of Orthopaedics. Safdarjang Hospital. New Delhi.
`India.
`Requests_ for reprints shoul~be sent to Profe~sor G._ K. Vishwakar~a~
`1 · 191!6 Britis:t Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
`0301 620X 1!61013 $2.00
`
`6H
`
`HIE JOlTRNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
`
`

`

`AMNIOTIC ARTHROPLASTY FOR TUBERCULOSIS OF THE HIP
`
`69
`
`of amniotic membrane with the twin objectives of eradi(cid:173)
`cating the disease and providing a painless, stable and
`mobile hip.
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`The study was conducted at the Central Institute of
`Orthopaedics. Safdarjang Hospital. New Delhi. from
`1980 onwards. on 28 patients with tuberculosis of the
`hip, all of whom had an amniotic arthroplasty. The diag(cid:173)
`nosis of tuberculosis was based on clinical and radiologi(cid:173)
`cal
`findings and
`laboratory
`investigations.
`It was
`confirmed by histopathology but not by bacteriology.
`Larson ·s ( 1963) hip disability rating scale was used to
`assess function before and after operation.
`The youngest patient was aged 10 years and the
`oldest 70 years (mean 27 years), with only five over 40
`years of age. The duration of the disease ranged from one
`to seven years. Details are given in Table I. Five patients
`had discharging sinuses with superadded bacterial infec(cid:173)
`tion before operation. The organism was Pseudomonas
`aeruginosa in three cases, Escherichia coli in one and
`Klehsiella sp in the fifth. One patient had a healed sinus.
`Twenty-four patients had fibrous ankylosis with absent
`or restricted movement and four had bony ankylosis.
`The degree of radiological destruction ranged from mild
`in 5 cases and moderate in II . to severe in 8 cases. with
`complete disorganisation in 4 patients.
`Follow-up was from 30 months to 46 months. Anti(cid:173)
`tuberculous drugs which included streptomycin, INAH.
`ethambutol, thiacetazone and rifampicin were given for
`three weeks before operation. Preliminary traction was
`used in some cases with fibrous ankylosis to help correct
`the deformity.
`Preparation of the amniotic cap. The amniotic cap was
`prepared according to a technique which has been stan(cid:173)
`dardised at this centre. Fresh placentae were collected
`from the maternity centre and washed in running tap
`water for 10 minutes. Amnion was separated from the
`chorion, and amniotic membrane, denuded of mucus,
`was collected in a beaker containing normal saline.
`Layers were then cut into squares and piled on a glass
`mould the size of a femoral head. There were 50 to 60
`layers in each cap, the mesenchymal surface of the mem(cid:173)
`brane always facing the glass mould. The amniotic cap
`was dried at ambient temperature for six to eight hours
`and a purse-string suture was then applied (Fig. I). The
`dried cap was sterilised in I% {J-propiolactone for two
`hours before operation, according to the technique of
`LoGrippe eta/. (1957). Repeated bacteriological studies
`revealed the efficacy of the P-propiolactone as a sterilis(cid:173)
`ing agent.
`Technique of operation. In adults the hip joint was
`exposed by a posterior approach; in children an anterior
`approach was used to avoid contamination of the wound
`by faecal matter. The iliopsoas tendon was routinely
`divided. Trochanteric osteotomy with subsequent distal
`transfer of the trochanter was used in cases with bony
`
`VOL. 68 B. No. I. JANUARY I'IX6
`
`ankylosis to allow a better exposure, and also in cases of
`total destruction of the head and neck of the femur to
`improve abductor power and, in some cases, to avoid
`impingement of the trochanter on the edge of the aceta(cid:173)
`bulum.
`The femoral head and the acetabulum were then
`reamed to expose healthy bleeding cancellous bone. The
`femoral head was shaped in a valgus direction and the
`acetabulum in cephalad and medial directions to pro(cid:173)
`duce some medial displacement of the reconstructed
`joint (Fig. 2). Care was taken to obtain smooth surfaces
`and reasonable congruity. Total synovectomy and cap(cid:173)
`sulectomy were essential parts of the technique, the most
`crucial stage of the operation being the excision of the
`anterior and medial capsule and synovial membrane.
`Care was needed to avoid injury to the femoral vessels.
`The posterior and superior rim of the acetabulum were
`excised to the extent that part of the head was uncovered
`when the limb was in neutral position.
`
`Fig. I
`Fig.:!
`Figure 1-A cap including 50 to 60 layers of amniotic membrane being
`prepared on a glass mould. Figure 2--Diagram to show the medial dis(cid:173)
`placement of the hip at operation. The heavy lines show the postopera-
`tive position.
`
`The prepared amniotic cap was then placed over the
`femoral head and anchored loosely to the neck with a
`purse-string catgut suture. In cases with total destruction
`of the head and neck (Cases 3, 4 and 9), a Colonna type
`of reconstruction was performed, the abductors being
`transplanted distally and the proximal shaft, covered
`with an amniotic cap, being placed in the acetabulum. In
`Case 20, also with total loss of the femoral head and
`neck, reconstruction was attempted by osteotomising the
`greater trochanter and placing the medial portion
`together with an iliac bone graft into the acetabulum,
`interposing an amniotic cap. All small bony fragments
`were then removed by cleansing with saline solution and
`suction. The wound was closed in layers with suction
`drainage for 48 hours. The limb was supported in a
`Thomas splint in abduction.
`Postoperative care. Static quadriceps exercises and active
`ankle and toe movements were started as soon as the
`patients recovered from anaesthesia. On the fourteenth
`day, after the removal of stitches, passive hip exercises
`were started three times daily in all directions except
`adduction; this facilitated the formation of a cleavage
`
`

`

`70
`
`G.K.~SHWAKARMA, A.K.KHARE
`
`between the layers of the amniotic cap (Vishwakarma et
`a/. 1980). Patients were also encouraged to perform
`active hip exercises.
`The splint was removed after four weeks and
`resisted active exercises were started. During the fifth
`week patients started walking with crutches, taking no
`weight on the affected limb. They were discharged from
`hospital after six weeks and continued antituberculous
`drugs at home for periods ranging from 4 to 18 months,
`usually 6 to 10 months. Partial weight-bearing was
`allowed at 18 weeks and full weight-bearing after 20
`weeks. Crutches were discarded after 24 weeks.
`
`RESULTS
`The wound healed by primary intention in all but two
`cases, in which superficial infection was controlled by
`antibiotics. In no case was there recurrence of the disease
`during follow-up. The results were evaluated by the
`Larson hip disability rating scale (Tables I and II). The
`operation was a success in 25 patients, who had no pain
`
`and gained a good range of movement. All 25 could
`manage their daily chores, 22 of them could squat, 24
`could sit cross-legged, and all of them could relax com(cid:173)
`fortably on chairs. There was an average 0.5 em increase
`in shortening after operation. Bone condensation was
`seen radiographically in 21 cases, but in four patients
`(Cases 2, 4, 14 and 22) there was minimal resorption,
`which, surprisingly, did not compromise the result.
`Radiographs of four patients, with postoperative clinical
`photographs of one of them, are seen in Figures 3 to 14.
`Failures. One patient (Case 3) had a dislocation after a
`Colonna type of arthroplasty. Another patient (Case 26),
`an elderly man with long-standing tuberculosis and
`secondary infection of the hip, did not gain a satisfactory
`range of movement postoperatively; at a revision opera(cid:173)
`tion he sustained a fracture of the neck of the femur
`which failed to unite. The third failure (Case 23) suffered
`re-ankylosis from massive extra-articular bone forma(cid:173)
`tion. None of the three failures was caused by the amnio(cid:173)
`tic element of the arthroplasty.
`
`Table I. The clinical findings before operation in 28 patients having an amniotic arthroplasty for tuberculosis of the hip
`
`Caae
`
`Age
`(yt'llrS)
`
`Sex
`
`Duratioo
`of
`diseaae
`(years)
`
`Lanoaseore
`
`Pain
`
`Fuactloa
`
`Galt
`
`Fixed
`flexioa•
`(dqr~~s)
`
`Range of
`flexioa
`(degr~~s)
`
`Total
`SborteoiDg Lanoa
`seore
`(em)
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`II
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`18
`10
`15
`20
`18
`32
`29
`45
`25
`24
`60
`34
`40
`23
`16
`15
`20
`16
`29
`26
`16
`16
`14
`29
`60
`70
`14
`22
`
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`F
`M
`F
`M
`M
`F
`M
`M
`F
`M
`F
`M
`M
`M
`M
`M
`
`3
`3
`3
`4
`7
`4
`4
`
`2
`
`4
`3
`
`7
`3
`2
`2
`2
`4
`5
`7
`4
`3
`2
`4
`7
`3
`2
`
`0
`0
`10
`0
`0
`0
`0
`10
`0
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`0
`10
`30
`10
`10
`20
`0
`0
`0
`0
`10
`0
`0
`0
`
`6
`6
`12
`6
`6
`6
`14
`15
`8
`15
`12
`12
`14
`12
`12
`12
`4
`14
`14
`6
`15
`14
`6
`14
`12
`6
`12
`6
`
`4
`4
`6
`6
`4
`4
`8
`4
`6
`8
`6
`6
`6
`4
`4
`4
`4
`6
`6
`4
`6
`6
`4
`6
`6
`4
`8
`4
`
`40
`70
`80
`10
`50
`15
`60
`20
`30
`30
`30
`45
`40
`45
`15
`60
`120
`15
`60
`80
`80
`60
`60
`50
`40
`50
`60
`40
`
`0
`0
`0
`10--70
`50--80
`0
`60--80
`20--70
`30--100
`30--60
`30--90
`0
`40--90
`0
`0
`60--90
`0
`0
`60--90
`0
`0
`0
`0
`50--70
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`5
`4
`4
`7
`3
`I
`3
`
`4
`I
`I
`2
`2
`3
`3
`2.5
`4
`2.5
`2
`3.5
`4
`1.5
`4
`2.5
`2.5
`3
`2
`
`10
`10
`28
`19
`16
`20
`23
`38
`19
`36
`37
`30
`37
`26
`22
`29
`38
`38
`35
`30
`21
`22
`10
`22
`30
`10
`22
`12
`
`• All except four patients had a fixed adduction or abduction deformity; all except eight had a fixed rotational deformity. There was no free
`abduction/adduction or rotational movement in any patient before operation
`
`THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
`
`

`

`AMNIOTIC ARTHROPLASTY FOR TUBERCULOSIS OF THE HIP
`
`71
`
`DISCUSSION
`Amniotic arthroplasty aims to provide painfree move(cid:173)
`ment and stability for the tuberculous hip joint. Arthro(cid:173)
`desis of the hip does not suit patients in the East, because
`social customs necessitate squatting, kneeling and sitting
`cross-legged. Other possible operative procedures might
`well have helped to eradicate the disease but might not
`have succeeded in providing a painless, mobile and stable
`hip with safety.
`Of the 28 cases in this series followed for more than
`30 months. 25 were successful, and primary healing took
`place even where discharging sinuses were present before
`operation. This seems even more significant since the
`dosage of antituberculous drugs after the patient was dis(cid:173)
`charged tended to be irregular. This was partly because
`the patients were free of symptoms and believed that they
`had been cured.
`Trelford eta/. (1975) and Walker, Cooney and Allen
`(1977) demonstrated clinically the healing effect of
`amnion as a dressing for pyogenic wounds, but gave no
`
`explanation. Vishwakarma, Krishnan and Khare ( 1981)
`found that for infected bedsores and degloving injuries of
`the limbs, dressing the wounds with amnion not only
`controlled infection but also resulted in the rapid appear(cid:173)
`ance of healthy granulation tissue covering exposed
`bone, which soon made the wound suitable for a split(cid:173)
`thickness skin graft. The possibility that the specific anti(cid:173)
`bacterial substance lysozyme (Fleming 1932) was present
`in amniotic membrane was considered by Robson,
`Samburg and Krizek ( 1972) but they concluded that this
`was not so. Gruss and Jirsch ( 1978) have shown that
`amniotic membrane applied to infected and contami(cid:173)
`nated wounds decreases the bacterial count. The pres(cid:173)
`ence of a weak antibody-like substance in amniotic fluid
`has recently been demonstrated and there is a strong pos(cid:173)
`sibility that it is elaborated in the epithelium of amniotic
`membrane (Galask and Synder 1970; Sachs and Stem
`1979).
`Induction experiments have shown that human
`amnion can induce the formation of epithelial cells in the
`
`Table II. The results after operation in 28 patients having an amniotic arthroplasty for tuberculosis of the hip
`
`FoUow(cid:173)
`up
`(months)
`
`Cue
`
`Larson score
`
`Pain
`
`Function Gait
`
`Range ( tkgrees)
`
`Fixed
`flexiont
`(degrees) Flexion
`
`Exten(cid:173)
`sion
`
`46
`20
`100
`46
`20
`100
`46
`Hip dislocated
`40
`90
`20
`44
`30
`100
`20
`44
`90
`15
`30
`44
`40
`110
`20
`43
`30
`100
`20
`42
`110
`20
`40
`43
`15
`30
`100
`40
`15
`110
`40
`40
`15
`40
`40
`110
`90
`10
`30
`38
`15
`40
`100
`38
`37
`110
`20
`45
`37
`15
`110
`40
`37
`90
`20
`30
`90
`15
`40
`36
`15
`40
`110
`36
`35
`30
`70
`0
`35
`90
`20
`0
`35
`40
`120
`20
`Extra-articular ankylosis
`34
`100
`20
`40
`33
`32
`110
`20
`30
`31
`Fracture of neck of femur
`90
`30
`40
`0
`40
`30
`100
`20
`t After operation only two patients had a fixed deformity in the coronal plane
`
`35
`35
`30
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`35
`30
`35
`30
`35
`35
`30
`35
`35
`20
`35
`35
`
`25
`25
`25
`25
`28
`24
`28
`28
`30
`30
`28
`30
`30
`28
`28
`30
`28
`24
`30
`20
`28
`25
`14
`30
`28
`14
`28
`28
`
`8
`8
`6
`8
`8
`8
`8
`10
`8
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`8
`10
`8
`10
`10
`6
`8
`10
`6
`10
`10
`4
`10
`10
`
`20
`
`10
`10
`
`10
`
`20
`10
`
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`II
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`VOL 68-B. No. I. JANUARY 1986
`
`Total
`Shorten-
`Adduc(cid:173)
`Abduc(cid:173)
`Larson
`ing
`Rota(cid:173)
`tion
`score
`(em)
`tion
`tion
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - · · - - - -
`50
`40
`30
`4
`84
`20
`30
`83
`40
`5
`5
`64
`83
`4
`R6
`4
`83
`1.5
`3.5
`87
`91
`2
`89
`3
`92
`1.5
`91
`2
`90
`3
`2.5
`92
`3.5
`88
`87
`4
`91
`3
`4
`86
`3
`79
`90
`3
`69
`4
`4.5
`82
`88
`2
`58
`4
`91
`3
`88
`3
`46
`4
`88
`3
`91
`2
`
`20
`30
`30
`30
`30
`20
`30
`30
`30
`30
`20
`30
`30
`30
`20
`30
`20
`30
`30
`
`30
`20
`
`30
`30
`
`30
`40
`30
`40
`50
`40
`40
`40
`50
`40
`40
`50
`50
`40
`40
`40
`20
`20
`40
`
`50
`40
`
`40
`40
`
`

`

`72
`
`G. K. VISHWAKARMA, A. K. KHARE
`
`Case 22. Radiographs of the right hip before and 35 months after
`operation . showing a well-formed joint space. Clinical photographs of
`the patient squatting and sitting cross-legged after operation.
`
`Fig. 5
`
`Fig. 6
`
`Fig. 7
`Fig. 8
`Fig. 9
`Case 9. Radiographs of the left hip. Figure ?- Before operation. showing total destruction of the joint. Figures 8 and 9- At 6 months
`and 43 months respectively after a Colonna-typc arthroplasty with an amniotic cap.
`
`Fig. 10
`Fig. II
`Case I~- Radiographs before and 40 months after amniotic arthroplasty. A well-marked joint space
`has developed.
`
`THE JOl .R'-'AL OF HONE AND JOINT SURGERY
`
`

`

`AMNIOTIC ARTHROPLASTY FOR TUBERCULOSIS OF THE HIP
`
`73
`
`Fig. 14
`Fig. 13
`Fig. 12
`Case 13. Radiographs of the left hip. Figure 12- Before operation. Figures 13 and 14--At 20 months and 38 months respectively after opera(cid:173)
`tion. Note the joint space. the contour of the femoral head and the new bone formation at the lateral border of the acetabulum.
`
`chorio-allantoic membrane of the fertilised chicken egg
`(Sawyer, Abbott and Trelford 1972) and this method
`indicates one avenue of research. Induction phenomena
`have not been seen in the clinical situation as yet. but the
`complexities of the amnion cell suggest that it may have
`multiple functions . Vishwakarma et a/. ( 1980) observed
`the formation of joint-type tissues when multilayered
`amniotic cap was interposed. and this indicates that the
`human amnion may be capable of inducing the forma(cid:173)
`tion of diverse tissues.
`More study is needed of the immunology of the
`amniotic membrane. There was no immunological reac(cid:173)
`tion or rejection phenomenon in any of our patients.
`Embryonic cells may be immunologically inert because
`of the absence of antigen which determines histo(cid:173)
`compatibility (Boyd and Hamilton 1970). Unusual
`immunology could be due to fetal membrane collagen
`(Burgeson eta/. 1976). Attempts to detect antibodies or a
`cell immune response to amniotic membrane have never
`succeeded. Study of the fetomaternal relationship has led
`to the comparison of the status of the fetus with that of a
`parasite that successfully avoids host rejection (Faulk
`and Galbraith 1979). A glycoprotein occurring in
`trophoblast and amniochorion is considered
`to be
`important in suppressing detection of the fetus as
`"foreign" to the mother. by acting on maternal lympho(cid:173)
`cytes and preventing rejection throughout pregnancy
`(Mcintyre and Faulk 1979). lmmunodiagnostic tech(cid:173)
`niques continue to be important in the effort to ascertain
`the precise action of immunobiologically active glyco(cid:173)
`protein of the extra-embryonic tissues. Antigenicity of
`the amnion. for whatever reason. appears to be low and
`violent host responses have not yet been demonstrated
`(Trelford and Trelford-Sauder 1979).
`A painless joint with some mobility was achieved in
`most of our cases. It has been postulated that pain origi(cid:173)
`nates mainly from the capsule and to some extent from
`the muscles. Kellgren ( 1939) and Kiaer ( 1950) provided
`clinical evidence that pain could arise from cancellous
`
`bone. and nerve fibres have been demonstrated in the
`interior of bone (Gardner 1950). Blood vessels are sup(cid:173)
`plied by nerves, possibly part of the vaso-sensory appar(cid:173)
`atus. In our cases some pain relief may have followed the
`release of iliopsoas. quadratus femoris and the short
`external rotators of the hip; this decreases the compres(cid:173)
`sive forces on the hip joint and improves the distribution
`of pressure by correcting flexion and adduction contrac(cid:173)
`tures. Complete capsulectomy destroys the nerve supply
`to the joint.
`Nerve fibres in the cancellous bone may be neutra(cid:173)
`lised by the metaplastic formation of fibrocartilage at
`both the articular surfaces (Vishwakarma et a/. 1980)
`and a contributing factor may have been the formation
`of a pseudo-synovial membrane and synovial fluid which
`kept the new joint lubricated. The average range of
`movement after operation in the 25 successful cases was
`flexion 100. extension 15 . abduction 35' . adduction 25'
`and rotation 40 ·.
`The basic objectives of the procedure were achieved.
`Better. quicker results might have been possible. if
`muscles had not been wasted by chronic disease. Ade(cid:173)
`quate physiotherapy could not be given after the patients
`were discharged, most of them to their own villages.
`Excision of the posterosuperior rim of the acetabulum
`seemed
`to help achieve increase in abduction and
`rotation, in addition to the freedom of movement at
`the joint newly formed by
`the amnioplasty · itself.
`Vishwakarma et a/. ( 1980) have demonstrated experi(cid:173)
`mentally the formation of a near-perfect joint with a cap(cid:173)
`sule. Medialisation of the joint. with valgus reaming of
`the femoral head and neck. added to the remarkable
`stability of the reconstructed joints. while the realign(cid:173)
`ment of muscles around the hip improved their function.
`Law ( 1962) demonstrated that with the passage of time
`and the growth of fibrous tissue around the joint. nerve(cid:173)
`endings from the surrounding muscles may infiltrate the
`structures and restore some joint sensation.
`Condensation of bone around the acetabulum and
`
`VOL. 68 B. No. I. JANUARY I'IX6
`
`

`

`74
`
`G. K. VISHWAKARMA, A. K. KHARE
`
`head of the femur was found in all but four cases (Case 2.
`4. 14. 22). providing some indirect evidence of a healing
`process induced by the amnion. In the four cases with
`some resorption, this was minimal. This also substan(cid:173)
`tiates that the major source of blood supply to the
`remaining portion of the head and neck is provided
`through the neck and is not entirely dependent on circu(cid:173)
`lation through the capsule. (Freeman 1978).
`An average of 0.5 em increase of shortening was
`caused by the operation. This is insignificant and in
`Cases 4 and 9 gain in length was achieved by trochanteric
`arthroplasty in the absence of the femoral head and neck.
`There was also an increase in leg length in cases with a
`wandering acetabulum when the new acetabulum was
`created at the original site (Case I).
`The potential of the application of amniotic mem(cid:173)
`brane to surgery is now being realised and is as wide as
`imagination and experiment can make it. An arthro(cid:173)
`plasty for tuberculosis which includes joint debridement
`and the interposition of an amniotic cap not only seems
`to eradicate the disease but also to induce bone forma(cid:173)
`tion and speed up the healing process. Amnioplasty
`offers a satisfactory solution to the problem of hip joint
`tuberculosis, especially for patients in the East, where an
`adequate range of movement is a priority.
`
`This project was supported by a grant from the Indian Council of
`Medical Research, New Delhi (India).
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Boyd JD, Hamilton WJ. Tht• human placenta. Cambridge: W HefTer &
`Sons. 1970.
`Brindeau A. Creation d'un vagin artificiel a I' aide des membranes ovu(cid:173)
`laires d'un oeuf a terme. Gynec Ohstet (Paris) 1934;29: 385-92.
`Burger K. Experimental and clinical studies on transplantation of the
`fetal membranes. Orv Heti/1938;82:800-1.
`Burgeson RE, El Adli FA, Kaitila II, Hollister DW. Fetal membrane
`collagens: identification of two new collagen alpha chains. Proc
`Nat/ A cad Sci LSA 1976:73:2579 83.
`Campbell WC. Mobilization of joints with bony ankylosis: an analysis
`ofllOcases.JAMA 1924:83:97681.
`Davis JS. Skin transplantation: with a review of 550 cases at the Johns
`Hopkins Hospital. John.v Hopkins Hosp Rep Balt1910; 15:307-96.
`de Rotth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with fetal membranes.
`Arch Ophtha/mo/1940;23:522 5.
`Douglas B. Homografts of fetal membranes as a covering for large
`wounds-especially those from burns: an experimental and clini(cid:173)
`cal study (preliminary report). J Tenne.uee Med Assoc 1952;45:
`230 5.
`Faulk WP, Galbraith GMP. Trophoblast transferrin and transferrin
`receptors in the host-parasite relationship of human pregnancy.
`Proc R Soc Lond(Biol) 1979;204:83--97.
`Fleming A. Lysozyme: president's address, Proc R Soc Med 1932;26:
`71 84.
`
`Freeman MAR. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations rele(cid:173)
`vant to the surface replacement of the femoral head. Clin Orthop
`1978:134: 19-24.
`Galask RP, Synder IS. Antimicrobial factors in amniotic ftuid. Am J
`Ohstet Gyneco/1970: 106:59--{)5.
`Gardner E. Physiology of movable joints. Physiol Rev 1950:30:127-76.
`Gruss JS, Jirsch DW. Human amniotic membranes: a versatile wound
`dressing. Can Mt•d Assoc J 1978:118:1237-46.
`Kallio KE. Arthroplasia cutanea. Acta Orthop Scand 1957:26:327.
`Katayama R, ltami Y, Marumo E. Treatment of the hip and knee-joint
`tuberculosis: an attempt to retain motion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]
`1962:44 A:l!97 917.
`Kellgren JH. On the distribution of pain arising from deep somatic
`structures with charts of segmental pain areas. Clin Sci 1939;4:
`35-46.
`Kiaer S. Afferent pain paths in man running from the spongiosa in the
`femoral head and passing through the lumbar sympathetic gang(cid:173)
`lia. Acta Orthop Scand 1950:19:383-90.
`Kuznetsov NN, 1962. Cited hy Volkow MV. Arthroplasty of joints
`using amniotic membrane. In: Chapchal G. ed. Arthroplasty of the
`hip: 5th International Sympo.vium /972 in Nijmegen. Netherlands.
`Stuttgart: George Thieme, 1973.
`Larson CB. Rating scale of hip disabilities. Clin Orthop 1963;31 :85-93.
`Law WA. Late results of vitallium-mold arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone
`JointSurg[Am)1962;44-A:1497 517.
`LoGrippe GA, Burgess B, Teodoro R, Fleming JL. Procedure for bone
`sterilisation with beta-propiolactone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am)1957;
`39--A: 1356-64.
`Massee JS, Symmonds RE, Dockerty MB, Hallenbeck GA. Use of fetal
`membranes as replacement for pelvic peritoneum after pelvic exen(cid:173)
`teration in the dog. Surg Forum 1962; 13:407-8.
`Mcintyre JA, Faulk WP. Antigens of human trophoblast: effects of
`heterologous and anti-trophoblast sera on lymphocyte responses
`in 1•itro. J Exp Med 1979; 149:824-36.
`Ninman C, Shoemaker P. Human amniotic membranes for bums. Am J
`Nur.v 1975:75:1468-9.
`Robson MC, Samburg JL, Krizek T J. Quantitative comparison of bio(cid:173)
`logical dressings. Surg Forum 1972;23:503-5.
`Sabella N. Use of the fetal membranes in skin grafting. Med Rec NY
`1913;83:478-80.
`Sachs BP, Stem CM. Activity and characterization of a low molecular
`fraction present in human amniotic ftuid with broad spectrum
`antibacterial activity. Br J Ohstet Gynaeco/1979;86:81--{;.
`Sawyer RH, Abbott UK, Trelford JD. Inductive interactions between
`human dermis and chick chorionic epithelium. Science 1972; 175:
`527 9.
`Stem M. The grafting of preserved amniotic membrane to burned and
`ulcerated surfaces. substituting skin grafts. JAMA 1913;60:973.
`Trelford JD, Hanson FW, Anderson DG, Mendel VE. Amnion auto(cid:173)
`grafts, permanent structure. J Med 1975;6:243-7.
`Trelford JD, Trelford-Sauder M. The amnion in surgery, past and
`present. Am J Ohstet Gym•co/1979; 134:833-45.
`Vishwakarma GK, Krishnan R, Khare AK. Amniotic arthroplasty of the
`hip: an experimental study. Paper presented at the Indian Ortho(cid:173)
`paedic Association Conference, Bombay (India), September, 1980.
`Vishwakarma GK, Krishnan R, Khare AK. Use of amnion in infected
`wounds: paper presented at the Indian Orthopaedic Association
`Conference, Srinagar (India), May 1981.
`Volkov MV. Arthroplasty of joints using amniotic membrane. In:
`Chapchal G, ed. Arthroplasty of the hip_· 5th International Sym(cid:173)
`posium 1972 in Niimexen. Nether/and.v. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme,
`1973.
`Walker AB, Cooney DR, Allen JE. Use of fresh amnion as a bum dress(cid:173)
`ing. J Pediatr Surx 1977:12:391-5.
`Wilkinson MC. Partial synovectomy and curettage in the treatment of
`tuberculosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surx [Br]I957;39--B:66--79.
`
`THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket