throbber
The Journal Ofthe
`
`TENNESSEE
`
`.
`
`«scxananQ’ .
`---09u...
`",
`1L\"Em§m§/LD
`q“ \
`C 90:15foA\JN/
`
`Index to Advertisers on Page XL Table of Contents on Page W
`
`n cw drugs
`
`T110. steps {10111 the 01117311111
`(lmm(,1) n1 :1 therapeutic 'Igent
`10 it».
`[312161111211 Clinh11
`111111111411011 often me long 21nd
`cmnplcx. (11101111515, physicists,
`engineers, biologists, and 011101
`qualified scientists all are
`essential in developing lost
`11111:: discoveries into 11501111
`111611101111115. 111 1110 Lilly
`Research L111rurallurics7
`10111113 of specialists are involved
`in 110111 fundammnal
`
`and (lcvclopnmnml
`
`1‘111211'111ac0u1111111 and
`biolugical 11250111011.
`
`.‘
`
`‘_
`
`_‘
`
`..
`" ‘
`.
`.
`
`r635): nW\wmu
`INDIANA, U.S.A.
`
`what it;
`
`mkcs £0 (laws/op
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`'.
`
`l
`
`_
`
`.
`
`31/67:;
`
`.
`
`ELI LILLY AND COMPANY .
`
`INDIANAPOLIS 6,
`
`Upper Cumberland—Red Boiling Springs—June 24-25
`
`volume 45
`__,,,1
`(”9
`11.111111
`
`
`JUNE. 1952
`his material wascupied
`
`attha NLM and may be
`
`Number 5
`
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg.1
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 1
`
`

`

`IV
`
`June.
`
`I952
`
`The Journal of the
`TENNESSEE
`STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
`
`DEVOTED TO THE INTERESTS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION IN TENNESSEE
`R. H. KAMPMEIER. M.D., Editor
`OFFICE OF PUBLICATION, 504 DOCTORS BUILDING, NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE
`
`I952, by the Tennessee State Medical Association Copyright,
`Volume 45
`Single Copy. 50 Cents
`Per Year. $5.00
`
`I952
`JUNE.
`Number 6
`
`Published Monthly
`
`_______————-————
`
`Contents
`
`The Ofi‘ice Treatment of Gynecological Disorders,
`HARRY E, JONES, M.D., Chattanooga, Tenn. ...... 22]
`
`Office Management of the Diabetic Patient, PHILIP
`K. BONDY, M.D., Atlanta, Ga .................... 227
`
`Homografts of Fetal Membranes as a Covering for
`Large Wounds—Especially Those from Burns,
`BEVERLY DOUGLAS, M.D., Nashville, Tenn........ 230
`
`The Nature of Obstruction About the Bladder Neck,
`JOHN DOUGHERTY, M.D., Knoxville, Tenn......... 236
`
`Staff Conference ................................. 244
`
`The President’s Page ............................ 250
`
`Editorial ........................................ 251
`
`Special Item .................................... 254
`
`Deaths
`
`......................................... 255
`
`Programs and News of Medical Societies ......... 255
`
`National News .................................. 256
`
`Medical News inTenne'ssee ...................... 257
`
`Personal News .................................. 259
`
`Locations Wanted ............................... 259
`
`Announcements ................................. 261
`
`Officers of the Tennessee State Medical
`Association ................................ 262, XX
`
`lnstructions to
`Contributors
`Manuscripts
`submitted tor con-
`siderntion {or publication in the
`JOURNAL or I‘ll. Tsxnmsm STAT!
`MEDICAL Assocu-non should be ad-
`dressed to the Secretary-Editor, Dr.
`R. H. Kampmeier, Vanderbilt Uni-
`versity Hospital, Nashville 4, Ten-
`nessee.
`Manuscripts must be typewritten
`on one side of letter-weight paper.
`Either double or triple spacing and
`wide margins must be provided to
`facilitate
`editing which will
`be
`legible {or the printer.
`should
`Bibliographic
`references
`not exceed ten or twelve in number
`documenting key publications. They
`should appear at
`the end of
`the
`paper. The bibliographic references
`must conform to the stifle used in
`the American Medical Association
`publications sin—Aids. F. G. What
`Is Known About It. J. Tennessee
`M. A., 35:132. 1950.
`Illustrations must be mounted on
`white cardboard and be numbered.
`The editor will determine the num-
`ber.
`it any, of
`illustrations to he
`used. Additional
`illustrations will
`be
`charged to the author.
`The
`author’s name should appear on the
`back of each illustration.
`tho u-
`If reprints are desired,
`quested number should be indicated
`in
`the
`letter
`accompanying the
`manuscript.
`The author will be
`billed by the publisher.
`
` M »
`
`This Association Does Not Oiiicially lndorso Opinions Presented in Difierent Papers Published Heroin
`I879
`Entered as Second-Class Matter. May 29.
`I908, at the Post Office at Nashville, Tenn.. Under the Act of March 3.
`’___———————-———-————-—————-—-———-‘——-—'—‘
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg.2
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 2
`
`

`

`230
`
`HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR WOUNDS—‘Douglas
`
`June,
`
`I952
`
`The successful use of placental membranes as homografts for fh‘e'cov-
`ering of wounds is of interest.
`If their use proves to be consistently
`satisfactory and helpful, if is likely that many conditions will be found
`in surgery for their application.
`lHOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS A COVERING FOR LARGE
`WOUNDS—jESPECIALLY THOSE FROM BURNS’
`AN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL STUDY ‘
`
`(A Preliminary Report)
`EEVERLY ROUGLAS M. D.,* NashviIIe, Tenn.,
`
`Though the indications for the use of em-
`bryonal or
`fetal membranes
`in surgery
`may prove to be very wide, at
`this time,
`however, I shall refer to its use in burns
`only.
`In patients having 50 per cent or more of
`the body surface burned, the covering of the
`wound soon becomes a matter of critical im—
`
`portance. Pressure dressings, whosewalue
`we re-emphasized in 1923,1 as well as other
`methods to promote a surface coagulum,
`such as the tannic acid or the so-called ex-
`
`posure method, may help in certain cases. In
`the larger, second and third degree burns
`there is urgent need for a “living covering”
`which will prevent the loss of fluids, electro-
`lytes and blood elements as well as to pro—
`tect delicate nerve endings, and which will
`last for a prolonged though not of necessity
`a permanent period.
`The great amount of work which has been '
`done on homografts of skin in extensive;
`burns, and the attempt to prolong their pe-
`riods of takes,
`is evidence of a recognized
`need for a covering tissue other than the
`individual’s own skin. Yet in our experi-
`ence, as in that of many others, a relatively
`small percentage of homografts of human
`skin last more than a period of four weeks.
`After this,
`in most
`instances, they slough
`away either suddenly or gradually.
`It was the realization of this need for a
`
`satisfactory covering for burns and my work
`in Dr. Ernest Goodpasture’s
`laboratory,
`which proved that human skin and mem—
`
`branes can be successfully grafted on the
`chorio-allantoic membrane of chicks; 3 that
`led us to the belief that human amniotic and
`
`
`="From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Depart—
`ment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Hospital
`and School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.
`
`chorionic membranes might be used as
`homografts on human wounds.
`Our first experiments began in March,
`1951. This work concerns the use of living
`and not boiled nor dried preparations.
`It is
`interesting to note that Penfield, Humphreys
`and Chao" in 1940, and a year later Kohn-
`stan, suggested the use of “amnioplastin,”
`a preparation made by the immersion of
`amnion in alcohol for fixing, followed by
`drying in sheets and boiling in water for
`twenty minutes for sterilization. This was
`washed in normal saline before use. This
`
`fixed, dead amnion preparation was em—
`ployed by these authors as a covering to
`prevent adhesions during operations on the
`brain. Later Pinkerton“ and others used it
`
`for mobilizing adherent
`adhesions.
`
`tendons fixed by
`
`During the past fifteen years many arti—
`cles have appeared in journals on ophthal—
`mology referring to the use of small pieces
`of dead, fixed amnion to favor healing and
`to prevent adhesions in caustic and corrosive
`burns of the cornea and sclera. All of these
`
`articles refer to the use of “amnioplastin” 01‘
`similar preparations of boiled or otherwise
`fixed membrane. Amnion,
`the thinner of
`the membranes, was first used as a graft for
`formation of an artificial vagina in 1935 by
`Brindeau and by Burger in 1937.7
`I have found no reference in the literature
`
`to the use of the thicker membrane, chorion,
`which has been our choice thus far. How-
`
`to Kubani“ of Hungary belongs the
`ever,
`credit for advocating the use of living am-
`nion as a homograft for wounds from burns.
`Between the years of 1941 and 1948 he graft-
`ed it on wounds sixteen times, in four the
`grafts being larger than the palm of the
`hand. He describes two of the latter which
`were successful and states he made micro—
`
`MTF EX. 1017, pg. 3
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 3
`
`

`

`June,
`
`I952
`
`HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR \X/OUNDSwDouglas
`
`23l
`
`scopic sections of the amnion in one though
`giving no findings. He also used sterile am-
`nion to cover raw surfaces of the peritoneum
`after separating adhesions.
`
`Origin and Nature ot’Fetal Membranes
`Bailey and Miller“, in describing the de-
`velopment of the amniotic folds enclosing
`the fetus, dorsally and laterally, speak of the
`amniotic cavity “which is lined by ectoderm
`continuous with the ectoderm (later epider-
`mis) of
`the embryowthe ectoderm, lining
`the cavity and the overlying parietal meso—
`derm together constituting the amnion.”
`Regarding the origin of the chorionic mem—
`brane they say: “that the outer parts of the
`amniotic folds become completely separated
`from the inner—the (true) amnion, to form
`a second membrane consisting externally of
`ectoderm, internally of mesoderm, and called
`at first the serosa or false amnion, later the
`primitive chorion."
`At
`term, a great abundance of amniotic
`membrane is folded, up in the region of the
`placenta. The chorion is adherent by hya-
`line mesodermal connective tissue to the
`
`same type of connective tissue of the am~
`nion.
`In its connective tissue layer are a
`low blood vessels.
`Its outer or external
`
`layer is composed of a fairly thick layer of
`transitional
`cuboidal
`epithelium which
`makes
`its
`gross
`appearance
`somewhat
`more opaque and white than the thinner and
`more transparent amnion. Distalward from
`the placenta the two membranes are adher-
`ent to each other for quite a distance, but
`finally at the most distal portion one finds
`only amnion.
`
`
`
`FIG. 1. Separation of amnion, right from chorion,
`left for purpose of grafting wounds.
`
`In practice, for grafting purposes, the two
`membranes are easily separated with the
`sterile gloved fingers, so as to obtain sheets
`of each up to 18 inches square,
`(Fig. 1‘)
`Somewhat more of amnion may be obtained
`in each instance than of ehorion.
`
`Collection 01‘ Material
`
`For our purposes, placentas from recent
`deliveries of patients with negative serologic
`tests for syphilis are placed in sterile cov-
`ered pans. The amniOn may then be sepa-
`rated from the chorionic layer (Fig. l) or
`the two may be left together. Large pieces
`may then be cut away from the placental
`and cord attachments. Before cutting apart
`the attachment between the membranes, the
`outer or epitheliallayers of each are labeled
`with sterile skin clips or other markers for
`future identification. The membranes are
`then washed with normal saline, folded on
`themselves with a little plasma or saline
`between the folds and are wrapped in sterile
`cellophane or pliofilm. A sterile towel mois—
`tened with saline is wrapped around the cel—
`lophane and the package stored in a refrig—
`orator at one or two degrees above freezing
`until required for grafting. We have grafth
`membranes successfully after storing them
`for four days by this technique, but there IS
`no reason to believe that they could not be
`used after much longer periods.
`If desired,
`the membranes may be sterilized and quick
`frozen, by the method of Keeley and Gomez,
`I‘CPOI‘md for preserving arterial segments
`for grafting. They may then be kept for
`several weeks before being applied.
`If one
`wishes absolutely sterile membrane, it may
`be obtained from. cesarean section cases,
`although those from normal deliveries may
`easily be sterilized without difficulty.
`
`Experimental Work
`It was realized at
`the beginning of our
`work in 1951 that if human membranes were
`used in animal experiments they would be
`heterografts, and therefore less
`likely to
`take than homografts of human membranes
`applied to human wounds. But having had
`success with heterografts of human skin to
`chorio—allantoic membranes of fetal chicks
`and human membranes to chick membranes
`We carried out the following experiments
`on ten dogs.
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg.4
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 4
`
`

`

`232
`
`HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR WOUNDSv—Douqlas
`
`June,
`
`I952
`
`Under sterile conditions large wounds, as
`deep as the muscle, were made on the abdo-
`mens of female dogs. Amnion and chorion,
`respectively, were sutured on these wounds.
`Control wounds of equal size were made
`also.
`In most experiments the connective
`tissue layer of each membrane was applied
`to the wound surface.
`In some the epithe-
`lium was turned inward with good, though
`slower takes.
`It is a well—known fact that
`deep or pinch skin grafts take, but their take
`is slower when placed epithelial surface
`down on wounds.
`In another series of ani-
`
`mals, as well as in some of the above, the
`two membranes were buried under trap—
`
`door pedicle flaps in order to provide abso—
`lutely sterile conditions.
`Except
`for one dog in which infection
`took place, the membranes showed success—
`ful takes for the entire periods studied,—-one
`as long as twenty-nine days. The results of
`the take of amnion and chorion at five days
`and at fifteen days were recorded by photo-
`graphs. At the fifteen—day period the wound
`covered with amniOn had been reduced to
`
`the control
`only one—fourth the size of
`‘wound.
`In general, the dressings separated
`readily from the surface grafted with the
`amnion leaving a shiny, dry, pinkish sur—
`face. The chorion grafts were more opaque
`and more of a salmon pink color.
`Microscopic sections of the grafts, in gen—
`eral, gave similar findings for varying inter—
`vals after operation up to seventeen days.
`(Dr. Goodpasture studied the sections.) Mi-
`croscopic studies at seventeen days after
`grafting shows the wound to- be still covered
`with a homogeneous hyalinoid membrane
`which is stained pink, and seems character-
`istic of the hyalin connective tissue layer of
`the amnion. It is moderately infiltrated with
`leucocytes.
`Chorion removed from the
`wound surface at the same time showed the
`
`cells of the membrane alive with little sign
`of degeneration. In other sections of chorion
`and the adjacent skin edge, sixteen days
`postoperatively, the chorionic cells have ac-
`tually adhered to the dog’s connective tissue
`and the underlying capillary bed. The chori-
`onic cells are viable and mitotic figures are
`present.
`The findings in the specimens of the mem-
`branes buried in pockets corroborates the
`
`findings as to their viability, thus giving us
`a check on the surface graft experiments
`under conditions of more nearly perfect
`sterility. Longer
`time follow-up experi—
`ments are in progress.
`
`Application of Amnion and Chorion as
`Homografis to Humans
`It was clear after we had seen these mem—
`
`branes take and live, even as heterografts
`on dogs, that they should live as homografts
`on members of the same species.
`Homografting was first done successfully
`on humans in March, 1951. The patient had
`extensive wounds from a burn.
`
`Brief reports on this case and two others
`of successful grafts on humans are included
`here. Detailed reports will be published
`elsewhere.
`
`Case 1. V.U.H. No. 196,623. A woman admitted
`on March 9, 1951. Diagnosis: Extensive burns.
`A specimen of fresh amniotic membrane, removed
`from a placenta and sac, was kept as near sterile as
`possible at delivery and was then washed in nor-
`mal saline. One hour later it was applied to the
`granulating surface of a burn around the upper
`third of the right leg, immediately below the pop-
`liteal space. This membrane was approximately
`7 x 4 inches, or 28 square inches in size,-—roughly
`the size of a full drum of skin cut by a large skin
`graft machine.
`It was sutured in the manner of a
`thick split graft with stitches at
`the edge and
`“quilting” stitches through its surface to hold it
`down into the deepest parts'of any depressions. A .
`few perforations were made in it
`for drainage.
`The wound was only fairly clean. Granulations
`were scrubbed with ether and the skin edges were
`prepared with weak iodine followed by alcohol.
`Three drums of skin from her brother were ap-
`plied as homografts to the same, and the other
`extremity, respectively. Sulfathiazole powder was
`dusted sparsely on the surface of the amnion graft
`and dry gauze and elastoplast were used for light
`pressure over all.
`(In burns of the extremities,
`since large sheets of membranes may easily be
`obtained,
`they may be stretched around the ex—
`tremity, stitched to themselves, and a pressure
`dressing applied over all.)
`The dressing, seven days postoperatively, showed
`the membrane taking in large part. The dressing
`came off easily, being adherent only at the per-
`forations where a
`few granulations were still
`showing.
`At dressing, 13 days postoperatively, the amnion
`was still adherent and apparently healthy. At
`this time, because of the urgency of obtaining per-
`manent healing, squares of it were excised and
`supplanted by similar squares of. the patient’s own
`skin in “eheckerboarc” fashion.
`The patient’s
`condition had improved by this time and she was
`
`MTF EX. 1017, pg. 5
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 5
`
`

`

`June, 1952
`
`HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR WOUNDS—Dougloa
`
`233
`
`in good nitrogen balance probably due to the three
`hornogralfts of her brother’s skin and the mem—
`brane grafts.
`At 21 days postoperatively the portions of am—
`nion grafts which had not been removed still zip-
`peered dry and adherent to the wound, affording
`a good nonexudative surface, but was apparently
`being undergrown at
`its edges by the patient’s
`own autograt‘ts.
`’l‘he brother‘s skin was inflamed
`and was evidently sloughcd off.
`It was replaced
`by the same type of autog‘afts.
`Microscopic sections in this case were reported
`by Dr. Goodpasture as follows:
`"Thirteen days
`mistoperative, g ‘anulating surl'atce lined interruph
`cdly, but almost completely with fairly thick hya-
`linized membrane which in places is so folded
`upon itself as to suggest very strongly an origin
`in the hyalin portion ot
`the amniotic membrane.
`In a tow l‘oci this membrane has the light staining
`character of hyaline amnion which appears swol-
`len by imbibition or fluid in such a way as to give
`it a vacuolated and fibrillm‘y appearance.”
`At
`twcnty~one days sections showed the same
`homogeneous thin pink staining hyalin membrane.
`On subsequent dressings the autogral‘ts applied to
`both the membrane and brother’s Skin areas were
`found to have spread out and supplanted both
`liomograft areas and to have caused both to heal.
`
`These promising results led us to try sev-
`eral further membrane homografts in other
`human cases, always with the full consent
`of the patient. We shall give only two fur-
`ther abstracts very briefly.
`
`Case 2. V.U.H. No. 205,931. A 45—year—old col—
`ored female, who had numerous granulating areas
`on her body from a burn, was operated upon on
`February 15,
`1952. During a
`split
`skin graft
`procedure, a sheet of chorion two inches square
`was sutured into a pocket made at
`the edge 0f
`
`
`
`Photomicrograph of chorion buried .ln
`2.
`Fin.
`pocket at edge of donor area on chest from which
`split graft had been removed.
`Sec Case 0.1!.
`Layer ol' chorion above is intact, anti-c, and cells
`have healthy nuclei. Connective tissue layer, b-c,
`is united with that of human, c—d.
`
`one of the donor areas by undermining the skin
`immediately below the derma,
`implanting the
`chorion and closing the superficial wound.
`The specimen removed “en bloc” Iourteen. days
`postOperatively showed that the chorion membrane
`was alive and had healthy nuclei, both in the
`epithelial and connective tissue cells. Only where
`the circulation was impaired, due to the rolling
`01'
`the chorion on itself, was there any Sign of
`degeneration and no hemorrhagic condition was
`present to indicate anaphylactic phenomena,
`(Fig.
`2.)
`
`Case 3. V.U.H. No. 208,262. A white male, aged
`27 years.
`A sheet of chorion, collected at a delivery within
`the hour, was washed with saline and applied to a
`site on the right, lower dorsal region, from which
`a split skin graft had just been cut. Four sutures,
`one at each corner of the membrane, were used to
`fix it in place on the area.
`(Fig. 3.) A dry dross-
`ing overlaid with elastoplust was applied.
`
`
`
`FIG. 3. Living chorion on wound of lower dorsal
`region, 7 days postope‘ativcly, between stitches at
`corners m—n—o—p.
`
`At dicesing seven days postoperatively the area
`of chorion included between four sutures was
`found to be entirely dry, salmon—colored and 11011“
`adherent to the dressing, while other donor areas,
`including those immediately below and above the
`membrane, bled lrccly. A portion of the mem~
`branc which overlay the normal skin edge was
`
`MTF EX. 1017, pg. 6
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 6
`
`

`

`234
`
`HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR WOUNDS Douglas
`
`June, 1952
`
`parchment like, and on lifting up a portion of the
`healed adherent membrane it was pulled away
`from its bed or base which bled freely, strongly
`suggestive of a take. No exudation had taken
`place anywhere except at one or two areas under
`the upper portion of the chorion graft where two
`small blisters had formed.
`Dr. Goodpusture reported the following results
`of microscopic finding in this chorion homograft
`(Fig. 4):
`“The chorion cells have survived. The mom-
`brane is preserved on the surface. A thick layer
`of chorionic epithelium is present.
`In some areas
`the chorionic epithelium is undergoing necrosis
`and is infiltrated with PMN cells, but throughout,
`the chorionic epithelial cells the nuclei stain well,
`and the cytoplasm has normal staining qualities.
`In other areas, although no mitotic figures are
`seen,
`the chorionic cells are well preserved, and
`the nuclei are normal.”
`
`
`
`FIG. 4.
`Patient Hit photo-micrograph showing
`.
`thick protective layer of epithelium and connective
`tissue cells of chorion between X and X‘ which has
`united with cells of patient.
`
`It was of interest that at subsequent dressings
`the donor area grafted with chorion appeared to
`look better and give the patient
`less pain and
`irritation than did other donor skin areas from
`which grafts had been taken on the same day.
`Other sections are being made at intervals to de-
`termine how soon the chorionic cells are substi~
`tutcd for by the underlying and surrounding epi-
`thelium oi? the patient.
`
`Comment
`
`It is not necessary to point out how easy
`and impersonal it
`is to obtain this widely
`distributed human material which at present
`seems to find its only destiny to be “thrown
`into the bucket,” especially if it is normal.
`Many uses for placental membranes may
`be foreseen in surgery alone, provided it be~
`haves for others as it seems to be behaving
`for us.
`Its advantages, not only in burns,
`but in other small and extensive wounds are
`
`obvious. Membranes should be helpful in
`
`in tendon injuries.
`preventing adhesions
`We believe that dressings over small wound
`surfaces may be prevented from adhering
`and bleeding when removed later, if a small
`piece of membrane is first applied. After all,
`at one time it was continuous with the
`actual skin of the fetus.
`
`We do not know as yet, but we hope to
`have the answers soon to the question of
`whether or not it will give a permanent
`wound covering for more than six Weeks.
`Our work thus far certainly appears to in—
`dicate that it will provide a very efficient
`living for a considerable period of time, and
`that it can be a very present help in burns
`just as homogral’ts of skin have been in the
`past.
`It is obvious that no grafting of mem-
`branes should be done unless the recipient
`and his wound are as well prepared surgi-
`cally as we would be demanded for skin
`grafting. The same postoperative care must
`be carried out in detail.
`More work is needed on the early exten~
`sivc debridement of burns and their cover-
`
`ing with membranes until skin can be sub
`stituted. Other questions also must be an—
`swered.
`What conditions will favor survival of the
`
`membrane grafts? How long under opti—
`mum conditions will they Survive? What is
`the best way to sterilize them without affect—
`ing their viability, and how long can they
`be safely stored under refrigeration before
`use? Do the membranes contain specific
`
`the
`factors like homografts of skin? Will
`capillary vessels invade the grafts giving
`stable healing, or will there be only a plus“
`matic circulation? By providing a living
`covering will
`the membranes prevent cica~
`tricial contractures by lessening scar forma-
`tion until skin can be substituted? What is
`
`the value of preserving membranes by freez—
`ing for military purposes?
`Work is already under way which will
`help to solve many of these problems and
`further reports will be forthcoming.
`
`Conclusion
`
`1. Large living grafts of both human am-
`nion and chorion, when applied to fresh
`wounds of dogs and humans, have been
`proven to take and remain viable under the
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 7
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 7
`
`

`

`June,
`
`I952
`
`‘HOMOGRAFTS OF FETAL MEMBRANES AS COVERING FOR WOUNDS—Douglus
`
`235:
`
`The author wishes to acknowledge with grati—
`tude the kind help of Dr. Ernest Goodpasture
`throughout this work, and to thank members of the
`Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for their
`help in collecting the membranes.
`
`conditions and during the periods of time
`described.
`
`2. These membranal grafts appear to cov-
`er delicate nerve endings, to prevent con—
`tamination of the surface on which they take,
`and loss of fluids and electrolytes therefrom.
`3. Microscopic sections of chorion grafts
`reveal that the chorionic membrane cells are
`
`in the living state at least as long as 17 days
`after application.
`4. Similar sections of amnion on wounds
`show the surface to be covered with a mem-
`
`Bibliography
`1. Douglas, 3.: Restriction of Rate of Flow and
`Interchange in the Capillaries. Administration of
`Vasoconstrictor Drugs to Prevent Absorption of
`Injurious Substances, especially in Superficial
`Burns, and in Traumatized and Infected Tissues,
`J.A.M.A., 81:1937, 1923.
`2. Goodpasture, E. W., Douglas, B., Anderson,
`K.: A Study of Human Skin Grafted upOn the
`Chorio—allantois of Chick Embryos, J. Expcr. Med-.
`682891, 1938.
`3. Goodpasture, E. W., Anderson, K.; Virus In-
`[ection of Human Fetal Membranes Grafted on the
`Chorio-allantois of Chick Embryos, Am.
`.1. Path,
`18:563, 1942..
`4. Chao, Humphreys and Penfield: A New Meth—
`od of Preventing Adhesions. The Use of Amnio-
`plastin After Craniotomy, Brit. Med. J., 1:517, 1940-
`5. Pinkerton, M. C.: Amnioplastin for Adherent
`Digital Flexor Tendons, Lancet, 1:70, 1942.
`6. Kubani, A.: The Use of Sterile Amnion Ob-
`tained from Cesarean Sections in Place of Skin
`Grafts, Ann. Italiani di Chirurgia, 25:10, 1948-
`7. Kubani, A.: mitt—Quoted by Kubani.
`8. Bailey, F. R., and Miller, A. M.: Foetal Mem-
`branes. Textbook of Embryology, William Wood,
`. Publisher, 1911, p. 101.
`9. Keeley, R. L., Gomez, A. C., and Brown, I. W-2
`Experimental Studies on Methods of Skin Preser—
`vation, Plastic & Reconstruct. Surg., 9:330, 1952.
`more advanced studies are completed.
`__________—____—______________________.__——
`
`composed of mesodermal hyalin
`brane
`fibrinoid tissue which appears to afford a
`satisfactory covering for the wound surface.
`On a human wound this hyalin membrane
`appeared at three weeks to afford as good a
`protective covering as did a homograft of
`brother’s skin applied simultaneously to the
`same patient.
`5. Grafts of amnion and chorion offer a
`
`widely distributed and readily available im—
`personal source of material for the purposes
`outlined and are much more easily obtain~
`able than homografts of human skin.
`6. Further studies of their use on exten-
`sive wounds and of their maximum survival
`
`time are already in progress.
`7. Their widespread use on extensive
`wound surfaces is not advocated until these
`
`Hyperglycemia. in Coronary Thrombosis, Ellenberg,.
`M., Osserman, K. E., 85 Pollack. IL, Diabetics, 1:
`16, 1952.
`
`Almost 25% of the patients who suffer an attack
`of coronary thrombosis have a transitory glycosuria
`and hyperglycemia.
`In these patients glucose to]-
`erance tests performed within two weeks following
`the attack of coronary thrombosis are universally
`abnormal. When the tolerance tests are repeated
`much later they are ordinarily found to be 0f a
`normal type. The explanation for these chant;es
`in glucose tolerance is not clear.
`The authors studied 75 consecutive autopsied
`cases of coronary thrombosis.
`In those in whom
`glucosuria occurred, circulatory collapse had been
`observed and the electrocardiogram indicated an
`
`extensive involvement of the myocardium. The
`average patient survived 6.3 days. At autopsy the
`infarcted area was large, and central liver cell
`necrosis was present.
`In the patients who did not
`have glycosuria the infarcted area was small, liver
`cell necrosis was not present, and survival time
`before death was much greater
`(average 20-3
`days).
`.
`In known diabetics the metabolic upset was in-
`tensificd only it shock occurred.
`The authors conclude that
`the hyperglycemia
`occurring in acute coronary thrombosis is a manl-
`festation of shock and is accompanied by central
`liver cell necrosis. This phenomenon is independ-
`ent of
`the presence of diabetes mellitus.
`(Ab'
`stracted for the Tennessee Diabetes Association by
`Albert Weinstein, Nashville.)
`
`MTF EX. 1017, pg. 8
`
`MTF Ex. 1017, pg. 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket