throbber
,3
`
`
`
`3mm. JournalafPlarrir singly (1939). 42463-461
`© I989 The Trustees of British Association of Plastic Surgeons
`
`0007~l226l89l0042—0463/510.00
`
`The healing of chronic venous leg ulcers with prepared
`human amnion
`
`D. J. WARD, J. P. BENNETT. H. BURGOS and J. FABRE
`
`Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinsread
`
`Summary—Forty chronic venous leg ulcers were treated, before split skin grafting, with human
`amnion prepared in one of the four following ways: tissue-culture-maintained, frozen. fresh or
`lyophilised. Although there was no significant statistical difference in the results obtained with the
`different preparations of amnion. we found that lyophilised amnion was at least as good as the other
`preparations in promoting a good take of the skin grafts and was the simplest to store and use. it also
`produced the shortest healing times. Frozen and fresh amnion were easier to prepare than lyophilised
`amnion but gave a lower graft take and a longer healing time. Tissue—culture-maintainad amnion was
`the most difficult to prepare and gave the poorest results. Its use was abandoned during the trial
`because of technical difficulties and a high infection rate.
`
`Human amnion has previously been shown to
`stimulate both granulation tissue and new vessel
`formation in chronic venous leg ulcers (Faulk et al.,
`1980). When applied to the ulcers prior to skin
`grafting, amnion promoted a good take ofthe grafts
`(Bennett et (11., 1980). The angiogenic and growth-
`promoting factors which are present in amnion
`have now been identified (Burgos, 1986).
`These previous studies used amnion maintained
`by tissue culture. This is a complicated technique
`requiring laboratory facilities and regular super-
`vision and is not practical for everyday use. Lyo-
`philised, frozen and fresh amnion have been used
`in the past to promote healing in a variety of
`wounds (Matthews et al., 1982): frozen and freshly
`prepared amnion gave good results (Sabella, 1913;
`Sterling, 1956; Dino er 01., 1966) but lyophilised
`amnion had a variable degree of success (Notea er
`a1., 1975; Unger and Roberts, 1976).
`We designed a trial to compare these three other
`preparations of amnion with tissue-culture—main-
`tained amnion,
`looking at ease of preparation,
`storage and use, and each one’s capacity to promote
`wound healing. Chronic venous leg ulcers were
`treated with fresh, lyophilised, frozen and tissue-
`culture-maintained amnion before split skin graft-
`ing and the results were compared.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`within 2 weeks of term. Patients with any condition
`predisposing to placental
`insufiiciency such as
`diabetes were excluded, as were patients with
`meconium staining of the liquor. A sample of cord
`blood was taken and the serum was tested for
`Hepatitis B. This was found to be negative in all
`cases. The blood was not tested for HIV as this trial
`was performed before HIV became widespread.
`The amnion and chorion were detached from the
`placenta under sterile conditions in the delivery
`Suite and were transported to the laboratory in ice-
`cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
`(pH 7.4)
`where the chorion was separated from the amnion
`and discarded.
`
`After cleaning and rinsing in PBS the amnion
`was divided into four pieces and each quarter was
`processed in one of the following ways:
`
`1 . Tissue—culture-mainzained
`
`5x 5 cm squares of amnion were maintained in
`tissue culture at 37°C for a maximum of 3 weeks
`using a modification of the method of Barges and
`Faulk (1981). The amnion was cultured in Petri
`dishes containing RPMI 1640 medium with 10%
`newborn calf serum buffered to pH 7.4 with
`HEPES. The culture medium was changed when—
`ever the pH rose above 7.6. No antibiotics were
`added. The amnion was thoroughly rinsed in sterile
`PBS immediately before applying it to the leg ulcer.
`
`Extra-embryonic membranes were collected from
`A 10 x 5 cm strip of amnion was placed between
`women undergoing elective Cacsarian section at or
`463
`
`2. Frozen
`
`MTF Ex. 1016. mm
`
`MTF Ex. 1016, pg. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`464
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
`
`two sterile nylon sheets, put in a sterile universal
`container and then rapidly frozen to — 25°C. It was
`kept at this temperature for up to 6 weeks and was
`defrosted immediately before use by warming the
`container to room temperature for 10 minutes. A
`swab was taken from each piece of amnion after
`defrosting, for bacteriological examination.
`
`3. Fresh
`
`5 x 5 cm squares of amnion were immersed in Petri
`dishes containing sterile PBS and were stored at
`4°C for a maximum of 24 hours before use. A
`sample of the PBS in each dish was taken for
`bacteriological examination.
`
`4. Lyophr'lised
`Pieces of amnion of varying sizes were laid onto
`trays of unsterile nylon netting and freeze-dried in
`a vacuum at —~ 30°C. Each piece was then placed in
`a universal container and irradiated with gamma
`rays (60,000 Rad). The amnion was stored in a cool
`dry place for up to 3 months. Reconstitution was
`by immersion in Ringer's solution for one minute,
`after spreading the amnion aseptically on a piece
`of paraffin gauze. The amnion was then applied to
`the leg ulcer without removing it from the paraffin
`gauze.
`All the patients had chronic unilateral or bilateral
`venous leg ulcers which had failed to heal over 6
`months despite intensive medical treatment. Ar-
`terial insufiiciency was excluded by clinical exami—
`nation of the peripheral arteries and, if no pulse
`was palpable, by Doppler ultrasound. Patients with
`diabetes were not included. The patients were
`admitted to hospital for elevation of the legs and
`bed rest. The ulcers were dressed for 48 hours with
`saline soaks. Clinically infected ulcers were dressed
`twice daily with eusol and paraffin until clean and
`then with saline soaks for 24 hours to remove any
`traces of the eusol and paraffin solution.
`Before the trial was started 80 randomisation
`cards. 20 for each treatment group, were shufl‘ied.
`On admission 3 card was drawn to place the patient
`in one of the four groups. If there were two ulcers
`on one leg or bilateral ulceration, each ulcer was
`allocated separately to one of the four treatment
`groups.
`Pieces of prepared amnion were applied to cover
`the whole of the unhealed leg ulcer. The amnion
`was covered with paraffin gauze and an occlusive
`dressing. This was left undisturbed for 5 days and
`the patient was confined to bed. The dressing was
`removed under general anaesthetic in the operating
`
`theatre at the time of the split skin grafting. The
`skin grafts were first inspected on the 5th postop-
`erative day and the take of the graft was estimated
`by the following method: the borders of the graft
`and of the ulcer margins were traced onto a sterile
`transparent nylon sheet which was then laid onto a
`0.5 cm square grid. From this the area of the ulcer,
`which was equal to the area of the original graft,
`and the area of the graft which had taken were
`measured. The percentage take of the graft was
`then calculated.
`
`If there was no take of the graft, stored skin was
`applied 2 days later. In all other cases the graft was
`cleansed and redressed with paraffin gauze and an
`occlusive dressing. The patients remained on bed
`rest until the 10th day when mobilisation with
`below-knee supportive bandaging was started.
`The trial was approved by the local ethical
`committee and informed consent was obtained
`from each patient before admission to hospital.
`
`Results
`
`Twenty-seven patients with a total of 40 ulcers were
`treated in this trial. Their ages ranged from 47 years
`to 85 years (mean 65 years): 5 were male and 2!
`were female. The ulcers occurred on the left leg in
`11 patients and on the right leg in 8 patients: 8
`patients had bilateral ulceration. ln 5 patients there
`were two ulcers on the leg: each was treated as a
`separate ulcer.
`Eleven patients (1 7 ulcers) had clinically infected
`ulcers on admission which were dressed with eiisol
`and paraffin until clean followed by 24 hours of
`saline soaks before the application of amnion.
`Sixteen patients (23 ulcers) had clinically uninfected
`ulcers which were treated with amnion 48 hours
`after admission.
`Nine ulcers were treated with fresh amnion, 12
`with frozen amnion, 16 with lyophiliscd amnion
`and three with tissue-culture-maintained amnion.
`There is an imbalance between the groups as a
`result of the method used for randomisation. Forty
`ulcers were treated, thus using only half of the
`randomisation cards. Only continuation of the trial
`to 80 ulcers would definitely have given equal
`numbers in each group.
`Few patients received tissue—culture-maintained
`amnion because of problems which were found as
`the trial progressed. These led to the abandonment
`of this technique during the trial. It was difficult to
`maintain a steady pH of the tissue culture medium
`‘ despite the addition of bufl‘ers. Infection of the
`
`
`
`MTF Ex. 1016. pg.2
`
`MTF Ex. 1016, pg. 2
`
`

`

`'t‘
`
`THE HEALING OF CHRONIC VENOUS LEG ULCERS WITH PREPARED HUMAN AMNION
`
`465
`
`medium occurred on several occasions despite
`careful attention to sterility. Fifty-five pieces of
`amnion were maintained by tissue culture, of which
`four became infected with Staphylococcus albus
`within 2 days of starting incubation and two were
`infected by the 6th day; four grew Aspergillus sp. on
`the 5th day.
`One extra-embryonic membrane was collected
`from a mother whose baby developed a pustular
`rash around the neck, face and perineum within 15
`minutes of delivery. The rash cleared after 24 hours
`without treatment. Nose, throat and skin swabs
`from the baby yielded no growth but the amnion
`grew diphthcroids after 5 days of incubation.
`None of the samples of PBS taken from the Petri
`dishes in the fresh group nor any of the swabs taken
`from the thawed frozen amnion grew any orga-
`nisms.
`The take of the skin grafts in each of the four
`groups is shown in Table l. Lyophilised amnion
`gave the best take of the skin grafts (mean 74.7%).
`Fresh and frozen amnion each achieved similar
`results (mean 56.7% and 53.3% respectively). The
`mean percentage take of graft in the three patients
`who received tissueculture-maintained amnion
`before its use was abandoned was 58.3%.
`The number of complete failures of the skin
`grafts to take was lowest in the lyophilised group
`(6.3%); 11.1% of the fresh group and 25.0"/o of the
`frozen group failed completely and needed the
`application of stored skin. Failure of the grafts to
`take prolonged the healing time and consequently
`delayed the patient’s discharge from hospital
`
`The time taken for the Skin grafts to heal fully is
`shown in Table 2. The mean healing time was 27.9
`days for fresh amnion, 25.0 days for frozen, 22.3
`days for lyophilised and 30.7 days for the three
`patients in the tissue-culture-maintained amnion
`group. The mean healing time in the lyophilised
`group was lower than in the other groups because
`of the good graft take.
`Most patients were discharged from hospital 2
`days after the grafts were healed but in three cases
`discharge was delayed by 6, 10 and 22 days for
`social reasons. Two patients were transferred to
`long-term residential care and their discharge was
`considerably delayed while these arrangements
`were made.
`
`Overall. lyophilised amnion gave the best results
`both in the take of the skin grafts, and consequently
`low healing times, and in the lowest number of
`complete failures of the grafts to take. Although
`these differences are not statistically significant,
`lyophilised amnion was the easiest to use and store
`and was at least as effective as the other preparations
`of amnion in promoting wound healing.
`
`Discussion
`
`Leg ulcers have been estimated to affect about 1%
`of the population (Callam er a1., 1985). Treatment
`is generally unsatisfactory and many patients
`remain unhealed despite venous surgery and pro-
`longed medical treatment. Although it is generally
`considered to be a disease of the elderly, a recent
`survey has shown that over one-third of patients
`
`Table l The percentage take of the skin grafts on the 5th postoperative day
`
`
`Amnion preparation
`Mean (x)
`Fresh
`0 20 25 50 50 90 90 90 95
`56.7
`Frozen
`O 0 0 20 SD 50 775 75 90 90 95 95
`53.3
`Lyophilised
`0 20 4O 50 75 75 90 90 90 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
`74.7
`Tissue-culture-
`50 50 75
`58.3
`maintained
`
`
`
`Table 2 The time in days for the skin grafts to heal fully
`
`
`Amnian preparation
`Mean (days)
`Fresh
`13 l9 19 22 23 35 36 37 47
`27.9
`Frozen
`15 15 15 16 I7 24 28 30 32 35 36 37
`25.0
`Lyophilised
`10 13 13 15 16 17 17 20 24 24 25 27 28 32 37 39
`22.3
`Tissuetulture-
`27 28 37
`30.7
`maintained
`
`
`
`MTF Ex. 1016. pg. 3
`
`MTF Ex. 1016, pg. 3
`
`

`

`n.__
`
`466
`
`have ulceration before the age of 50. (Callam et al.,
`1987).
`Amnion was first used on venous ulcers in 1913
`
`by Stern and has been used intermittently for this
`purpose since. It was found to have angiogenic
`properties when implanted in the thigh of patients
`with peripheral vascular disease (Troensegaard-
`Hansen, 1956) and when used on burns (Kirsch-
`baum and Hernandez, 1963). The development of
`profuse granulation tissue in leg ulcers after the
`application of amnion has been demonstrated both
`histopathologically
`and
`immunohistologically
`(Faulk er al., 1980). Angiogenic and growth-
`promoting factors in amnion have now been
`identified (Burgos, l983)artd partially characterised
`(Burgos. 1986). These factors appear to be high
`molecular weight complexes (molecular weight
`greater than 100,000) formed by active factor and
`carrier protein. The angiogenic factor has a molec-
`ular weight of between 400 and l 100 and is thought
`to be a peptide. Other factors with a molecular size
`between 500 and 30,000 molecular weight have also
`been identified. The factors are stable when frozen
`or lyophilised (Burgos, I983).
`The first clinical studies on the healing properties
`ofamnion used amnion maintained by tissue culture
`(Bennett et (11., 1980). In this trial we have used this
`technique on a larger scale and have found several
`drawbacks. Laboratory facilities are needed and
`close supervision .of the incubating process is
`necessary to watch for infection and excessive pH
`changes. The medium needs changing approxi-
`mately every 2 days to rectify pH changes and there
`is an increased risk of infection at this time. We do
`not know how long the amnion can be maintained
`in this way and still possess active angiogenic and
`growth-promoting factors. Amnion is known to
`survive well in culture for 2—3 weeks (Burgos and
`Faulk,
`I981) but
`the mitogenic properties of
`placental growth factors have been shown experi-
`mentally to fall to 35% of their original activity
`level after 8 days‘ incubation at 37°C (Burgos,
`1987).
`Although treatment with tissue-culture-main-
`tained amnion gave a fair take of the skin grafts
`(mean 58.3%)
`in three patients.
`its use was
`abandoned because of infection and the difficulties
`encountered in its preparation. We did not therefore
`investigate the possible decrease in activity of the
`angiogenic and growth-promoting factors.
`The patients were admitted with ulcers in varying
`degrees of cleanliness. We standardised their
`treatment into two groups, ensuring that the ulcers
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
`
`which were treated with eusol and paraffin had 24
`hours of saline soaks before the application of
`amnion so that any traces of hypochlori to or parafiin
`were eliminated. Although bed rest promotes
`healing of venous ulcers we feel that any advantage
`of the longer period of bed rest which the patients
`with infected ulcers were given was counterbal-
`anced by the poor state of the ulcers on admission.
`This trial was discontinued before the results
`reached statistical significance because concurrent
`research into the incorporation of the angiogenic
`and growth—promoting factors into synthetic dress-
`ings had been successful encugh to warrant clinical
`trials (Burgos. 1987). We are continuing to evaluate
`the use of a synthetic dressing impregnated with
`active factors (Burgos, in press).
`This trial shows that lyophilised amnion is the
`preparation of choice as it is efiective in promoting
`a high graft take and it is easy to store and to use.
`It has the disadvantage that although the prepara-
`tion is technically easy, a freezedrying machine is
`needed. Access to a gamma ray source for sterilisa-
`tion after lyophilisation is also necessary. lts storage
`time. however, appears to be indefinite as the
`factors in lyophilised amnion are known to be
`stable. It can thus be kept at room temperature and
`easily available in the ward. Reconstitution imme-
`diately before use is simple.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`We are grateful to Mr J. E. Bowen and Mr N. M. Breach for
`permission to include their patients in this trial.
`D. J. Ward was supported by a grant from British Petroleum
`pic.
`H. Burgos was supported by grants from the East Grinstead
`Medical Research Trust and Johnson & Johnson Ltd.
`
`References
`
`Bennett, J. P.. Matthews, R. N. and Faulh, W. P. (1980).
`Treatment of chronic ulceration of the legs with human
`amnion. Lancet, I. ”53.
`Barges. H. ( 1983). Angiogenic and growth promoting factors in
`human amniochorion and placenta. European Journal of
`Clinical Investigation, )3. 289.
`Burgos. H. (1986) Angiogenic factor from human term placenta.
`Purification and partial characlerisation. European Journal of
`Clinical lrruesligaubrr, I6. 486.
`Burgos, H. (1987) Incorporation and release of placental growth
`factors in synthetic medical dressings. Clinical Materials. 2.
`133.
`Burgos. H. (in press). The purification and clinical application
`of angiogenic and growth factors from human placenta and
`endometrium. Possibleautocrine-paracrine role. In : Genscev,
`0.. Klopper. A. and Besconsfield, R. (Eds) Human Placenta
`as a Model nnda Source. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.
`
`MTF Ex. 1016. MM
`
`MTF Ex. 1016, pg. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`THE HEALlNG OF CHRONIC VENOUS LEG ULCERS WITH PREPARED HUMAN AMNlON
`
`467
`
`Barges. H. and Fanlk. W. P. (1981). The maintenance of human
`amniotic membranes in culture. British Journal of Obstetrics
`and Gynaecology, 88, 294.
`Callam. M. J.. Ruekley, C. V. Harper. D. R. and Dale. J. J.
`(1985). Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem
`and provision of care. Brltllth Medical Journal. 290, 1855.
`Callarn. M. J., Harper, D. R., Dale, J. J. and Ruckley, C. V.
`(1987). Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. British
`MedicalJournal. 294. 1389.
`Dino. B. R.. Eufeurio, G. G. and De Villa, M. S. (1966). Human
`amnion: the establishment clan amnion bank andits practical
`applications in surgery. Journal of the Phillipine Medical
`Association. 42. 356.
`Fault. W. P, Matthews, R. N., Stevens. P. 1.. Bennett. J. P”
`unmet}. end Hal, 3. L. (1980). Human amnion asan adjunct
`in wound healing. lancer, 1, 1156.
`Kirschbaurn. S. M. and Hernandez, H. (1963). Use of amnion in
`extensive burns. Proceeding: ofrhe ThirdInternational Congress
`in Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam: Excerpta Media.
`Mottltews. R. N.. Faulk. W. P. and Bennett. J. P. ([982), In:
`Obstetrics and Gynecology Annual 1982. Nor-walk, Connecti-
`cut : Appleton-Century—Crofts.
`Notes, E.. Hirsebowltz, 3., Karev, A., Levi. J. and Mahler, D.
`(1975). The use of lyopbilised amnion to treat burns and skin
`defects. Hare/hall. 88. 265.
`Snbelln, N. (1913). Use of ietal membranes in skin grafting.
`Medical Record: anew York. 8. 478.
`Sterling, J. A. (1956). Use of amniotic membranes to cover
`
`surface defects due to flame burns. American Journal 0]
`Surgery. 91, 940.
`Stern. M. (1913). The grafting of preserved amniotic membrane
`to burned and ulcerated skin surfaces, substitutingskin grails.
`Journal ofthe American Medical Association, 60. 973.
`humped-Hansen, E.
`(1956). Amnion implantation in
`peripheral vascular disease. British Medical Journal. 2, 262.
`Unger, M. G. and Roberts, M. (1976). Lyophilised amniotic
`membranes on graft donor sites. British Joumal of Plastic
`Surgery, 29, 99.
`
`The Authors
`
`D. J. Ward, FMS. Clinical Research Fellow and Honorary
`Senior Registrar. Blond Mclndoe Centre for Medical Re-
`search, Queen Victoria Hospital. East Grinstead. West Sussex
`RHI9SDZ.
`J. P. Bennett, FRCS. Consultant Plastic Surgeon. Queen Victoria
`Hospital.
`H. Brrrgos. PhD. Research Fellow. Blond Mclndoe Centre for
`Medical Research.
`J. Fabre. MB, BS, B.Med.Se.(Hons). PhD, Professor and
`Director of Research, Blond Mclndoe Centre for Medical
`Research.
`
`Requests for reprints to Mr Ward.
`
`Paper recein 10 May l988.
`Accepted 19 December 1988 after revision.
`
`MTF Ex. 1016. pg. 5
`
`MTF Ex. 1016, pg. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket