`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Patent of AT HOME BONDHOLDERS’ LIQUIDATING TRUST
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-006571
`U.S. Patent No. 6,286,045
`Title: INFORMATION STORAGE AND DELIVERY OVER A COMPUTER
`NETWORK USING CENTRALIZED INTELLIGENCE TO MONITOR AND
`CONTROL THE INFORMATION BEING DELIVERED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before, KARL D. EASTHOM, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and MIRIAM L. QUINN
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`Submitted Electronically via the Patent Review Processing System
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`1 Case IPR2015-00660 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00657, IPR2015-00660
`
`Patent 6,286,045
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent
`
`Owner Richard A. Williamson, on behalf of and as Trustee for At Home
`
`Bondholders’ Liquidating Trust (“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests oral
`
`argument for the hearing currently scheduled for April 07, 2016 in IPR2015-00657
`
`(consolidated with IPR2015-00660) relating to claims 49-53, 55-59, 61-67, and 69-
`
`73 of U.S. Patent 6,286,045 (“the ’045 Patent”). To allow for a complete review of
`
`the issues presented in this preceding, Patent Owner requests one hour of argument
`
`time. Patent Owner relies on its briefing and evidence in the record for any and all
`
`remaining issues not specifically identified for oral argument.
`
`I.
`
`Issues to Be Argued
`A. Whether claims 49, 51-53, 55-58, 64-67, 70-71 of the ’045 Patent are
`
`obvious over the combination of Angles, Merriman, and HTTP1.0.
`
`B. Whether claims 50 and 69 of the ’045 Patent are obvious over the
`
`combination of Angles, Merriman, HTTP1.0 and Davis.
`
`C. Whether claims 59, 61-63, 72 and 73 of the ’045 Patent are obvious
`
`over the combination of Angles, Merriman, and HTTP1.0.
`
`D. Any issues identified by Petitioner Google in its Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`E.
`
`Rebuttal to Google’s representation on all matters.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`F.
`
`IPR2015-00657, IPR2015-00660
`
`Patent 6,286,045
`
`Any other outstanding motions and issues that the Board deems
`
`necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Patent Owner kindly requests the ability to use available audio visual
`
`equipment to display any demonstrative exhibits during the oral hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`March 03, 2016
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Garland Stephens
`
`
`
`Garland Stephens (Reg. No. 37,242)
`
`Justin Constant (Reg. No. 66,883)
`Audrey Maness (admitted pro hac vice)
`
`
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`
`700 Louisiana St., Suite 1700
`
`Houston, TX 77002
`
`T: (713) 546-5000
`
`Email: at.home.google@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jared Bobrow (admitted pro hac vice)
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`T: (650) 802-3000
`Email: at.home.google@weil.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`At Home Bondholders’ Liquidating Trust
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00657, IPR2015-00660
`
`Patent 6,286,045
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 03, 2016, a copy of PATENT OWNER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served by filing this document through
`
`the Patent Review Processing System as well as delivering a copy via electronic
`
`mail upon the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`Michelle K. Holoubek (Reg. # 54,179)
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`mholoubek-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Michael V. Messinger (Reg. # 37,575)
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Mikem-PTAB@skgf.com
`
` /s/ Justin L. Constant
`Justin L. Constant
`Reg. No. 66,883
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
