throbber
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Vol. 264, No. 1 (2005) 91(cid:150)96
`
`Changes in the secondary structure of proteins labeled with 125I:
`CD spectroscopy and enzymatic activity studies
`
`Y. M. Efimova,1* B. Wierczinski,1** S. Haemers,1 A. A. van Well2
`1 Department of Radiochemistry
`2 Department of Neutron Scattering and M(cid:246)ssbauer Spectroscopy,
`Interfaculty Reactor Institute, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands
`
`(Received April 6, 2004)
`
`Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme (LSZ) were radiolabeled with 125I. Three different methods for protein iodination with 125I were
`optimized. Parameters like incubation time and ratio of oxidizing agent and amount of protein were established. During protein iodination with
`125I, structural damages caused by the introduction of iodine into the protein may occur. These damages depend on the oxidizing agent used and
`may lead to considerable changes in the protein structure and, hence, their biological activity. Changes in secondary structure of LSZ and BSA
`were examined by circular dichroism (CD). Enzymatic activity tests were performed with lysozyme to check its biological activity. The Iodo Bead
`was found the best oxidizing agent for protein iodination.
`
`Introduction
`
`substances can be labeled by
`Many different
`radioiodination. Such labeled molecules are of major
`importance in a variety of investigations, e.g., studies of
`intermediary metabolism, quantitative measurements of
`physiologically
`active molecules
`in
`tissues
`and
`biological fluids, the adsorption kinetics and exchange
`of proteins on interfaces.
`Iodine-125 is most commonly used for iodination of
`compounds for in vitro procedures. It has a half-life of
`60 days and a (cid:1)-ray energy of 35 keV. Thus, 125I is the
`radionuclide of choice for
`radioiodination. Various
`methods have been developed for the radioidination of
`peptides and proteins.1(cid:150)5 They differ in the nature of the
`oxidizing agent
`(e.g., Chloramine-T,
`Iodogen,
`Iodo
`Beads) for converting 125I into the reactive species 125I2
`or 125I+. Those reactive species are incorporated into
`amino acid residues of the proteins. Mostly, substitution
`into tyrosine residues of the protein takes place, but
`residues, such as histidine,6
`substitution into other
`cysteine, and tryptophan may also occur.
`There are four levels of protein structure complexity.
`Primary structure is the amino-acid sequence specific for
`each protein. The shape of
`the polypeptide chain
`determines the secondary structure of the protein. There
`are four common secondary structures in proteins
`namely alpha helices, parallel or antiparallel beta sheet,
`turns, and random coil. Tertiary structure is the folding
`and twisting of secondary structures and the quaternary
`structure is defined as two or more polypeptide chains,
`which are assembled together. We assumed that changes
`in the secondary structure could be used as a probe for
`the structural stability of the protein.
`
`* E-mail: efimova@iri.tudelft.nl
`** Present address:
`Institut
`f(cid:252)r Radiochemie, Walther-Meissner-
`Strasse 3, 85748 Garching, Germany.
`
`During the process of the protein iodination by 125I
`different
`types of changes can occur in the protein
`structure.1
`(1) Damage caused by the iodination process. This is
`an important factor:
`if the labeling procedure itself
`damages the protein structure, considerable changes in
`biological activity in a variety of biological systems can
`take place. This kind of damage may depend on the
`oxidizing agent used. Therefore, we have considered
`three different oxidizing agents: Iodogen, Chloramine-T
`and Iodo Beads. It is known that Chloramine-T is a
`strong
`oxidizing
`agent
`and
`some
`proteins
`are
`the
`relatively strong oxidizing
`denaturated under
`conditions.7 Methods that use Iodogen or Iodo Beads are
`supposed to be more gentle.
`(2) Radiation damage. If very high activities of 125I
`are used for the iodination, the radiation emitted during
`the decay of 125I may cause bond breakage. Whenever
`possible, lower levels of radioactivity are used.
`(3) The introduction of an iodine atom by itself may
`have an influence on the properties of the protein.
`We have applied radiolabeling to study adsorption
`and exchange processes of proteins on solid surfaces.
`For these experiments it
`is very important
`that
`the
`structure of the labeled proteins does not change during
`the labeling process. We have optimized the labeling
`procedure for two proteins: Lysozyme (LSZ) is a (cid:147)hard(cid:148)
`globular protein with a stable secondary structure and
`shape, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) which is a
`(cid:147)soft(cid:148) globular protein and may easily change its
`internal structure. Changes of the secondary structures
`after radiolabeling were determined by using circular
`dichroism (CD)
`spectroscopy
`that measures
`the
`difference in absorbance of right- and left-circularly
`
`0236(cid:150)5731/USD 20.00
`' 2005 AkadØmiai Kiad(cid:243), Budapest
`
`AkadØmiai Kiad(cid:243), Budapest
`Springer, Dordrecht
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`

`Y. M. EFIMOVA et al.: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS LABELED WITH 125I
`
`polarized light. It has been shown that the CD spectra
`can be analyzed in terms of different
`secondary
`structural
`types. A number of
`review articles are
`available
`describing
`the
`technique
`and
`its
`application.8(cid:150)12 Furthermore, the enzymatic activities of
`iodinated and native LSZ were
`compared using
`Micrococcus lysodeikticus, which is a probe of the
`tertiary structure as well.
`
`Experimental
`
`Materials
`
`Proteins BSA (A4378) and LSZ (L6876) were
`purchased from Sigma and used without
`further
`purification. Tris buffer with a concentration of 50 mM
`and pH 7.5 was prepared by mixing 50 mM of Tris-
`(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane and 50 mM of HCl in
`an appropriate ratio. The buffer solution was made using
`Super Q-Millipore water and was filtrated through a
`membrane (Rotilabo-Spritzenfilter) with a pore size of
`0.22 (cid:181)m and stored at 4 (cid:176)C until use. Oxidizing agents
`Chloramine-T (C9887) and Iodogen (T0656) were
`obtained from Sigma, Iodo Beads from PIERCE (No.
`28665). Chloroform was from J. T. Baker (No. 7386).
`The 125I in a NaOH solution (370 MBq/100 (cid:181)l) was
`from Amersham Bioscience.
`PD 10 desalting columns with Sephadex G-25 as
`medium were purchased from Amersham Pharmatia
`Biotech. Micrococcus lysodeikticus has been obtained
`from Sigma (M3770). All activities were measured
`using a Wallac 1480 (cid:147)WIZARD 3(cid:148) sodium iodide
`counter. The protein concentrations were measured on a
`Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer.
`
`Labeling procedures
`
`Optimization: For fair comparison of the different
`labeling methods the optimum combination of
`the
`incubation time and the ratio between the amount of
`oxidizing agent and protein were determined.
`Iodogen and Chloramine-T methods: Both labelings
`were performed by mixing 100 (cid:181)l of the protein solution
`([protein] = 5 mg/ml in Tris buffer), 50 (cid:181)l of Na125I
`solution, and 20 (cid:181)l of Tris buffer or
`inactive NaI
`solution in a small Eppendorf cup. In the case of
`Chloramine-T labeling, 10 (cid:181)l of Chloramine-T solution
`([Chloramine-T] = 2 mg/ml) was also added to the
`mixture
`and
`the
`total
`reaction
`volume was
`approximately 180 (cid:181)l. Exact volumes were determined
`by weighing. For the Iodogen labeling a solution of
`Iodogen in chloroform ([Iodogen] = 2 mg/ml) was
`
`evaporated in the Eppendorf cup before adding the
`reaction solutions of total volume of about 170 (cid:181)l. The
`solution is allowed to stand for 30 minutes after mixing
`by gentle shaking.
`To reduce the probability of protein denaturation the
`procedure is run on ice. Finally 300 (cid:181)l of sodium
`metabisulfite solution ([Na2O5S2] = 1 mg/ml in H2O) is
`added to stop the radioiodination reaction.
`Iodo Beads method: Put one Iodo Bead into the 125I
`buffered solution (70 (cid:181)l) and let stand for 5 minutes at
`room temperature. Add 100 (cid:181)l of the protein solution
`([protein] = 5 mg/ml in Tris buffer) and incubate for 10
`minutes. The iodination process was
`stopped by
`separation of the Iodo Bead from the reaction volume,
`which was around 170 (cid:181)l.
`
`Separation from free iodide
`
`radiolabeled proteins were
`labeling the
`After
`separated from free iodine by use of a PD 10 desalting
`column. Before use the column is equilibrated with
`25 ml Tris buffer. The solution containing the free
`iodide and the labeled protein is applied onto the column
`and the mixture is eluted with Tris buffer. Fractions of
`about 0.5 ml are collected. Figure 1 shows a typical
`elution profile for the separation of free iodide and
`radiolabeled protein.
`
`Enzymatic activity test of LSZ
`
`The rate of lysis of Micrococcus lysodeikticus using
`turbidity measurements was determined.13 Native and
`radiolabeled LSZ were dissolved at a concentration of
`150(cid:150)500 units/ml with reagent grade water. Pipette
`2.9 ml of Micrococcus lysodeikticus cell suspension
`([Mic lys.] = 0.3 mg/ml in Tris buffer pH 7.5) into a
`cuvette and after adding 0.1 ml of dissolved LSZ record
`the changes in A450 (absorbance at wavelength 450 nm)
`per minute from the initial linear part of the curve. One
`unit of LSZ activity is equal to a decrease in turbidity of
`0.001 per minute at 450 nm, pH 7.5 and 25 (cid:176)C and the
`specific enzymatic activity of LSZ was calculated by:
`
`Units
`mg
`
`=
`
`1000
`(enzyme
`
`(cid:2)
`PA
`/min
`450
`mixture)
`reaction
`in
`
`mg
`
`(1)
`
`Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
`
`The CD spectra were recorded on a JASCO (J-715)
`spectropolarimeter. The temperature was kept constant
`at 20–0.1 (cid:176)C using a JASCO PTC-348WI thermostat.
`The spectra were scanned and then analyzed by
`Dicroprot 2000 software.14
`
`92
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`

`Y. M. EFIMOVA et al.: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS LABELED WITH 125I
`
`Fig. 1. Separation of free iodine and radioiodinated protein with a PD-10 column. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected
`and activities of each fraction were measured
`
`Results and discussion
`
`Labeling procedure
`
`NI/NI* is the ratio of inactive and radioactive iodine. Na
`[mol(cid:150)1] is the Avogadro(cid:146)s constant. The protein mass in
`the reaction mixture is mpr [g] and the Mpr [Da] is its
`molecular weight. (MLSZ = 14307 Da, MBSA = 66430 Da).
`The (cid:147)master(cid:148) curves for BSA and LSZ using three
`different labeling methods are presented in Fig. 2. The
`curves were fit with a linear
`function with an
`approximate slope 1 which justified our assumption that
`the labeling is a first order reaction. Table 1 gives the
`exact fitting results for the curves and the average of the
`fits for the three different procedures are presented as
`solid lines in Fig. 2 for both proteins. This means that
`Iodogen, Chloramine-T and Iodo Beads methods have a
`similar
`linear dependence of an increasing labeling
`efficiency with increasing amount of iodine atoms in the
`reaction mixture.
`
`Table 1. Slopes from fitting results of master curves for each method
`and their average for LSZ and BSA (Fig. 2, solid lines)
`
`Labeling method/ protein
`Chloramine-T
`Iodo Beads
`Iodogen
`Average:
`
`LSZ
`1.02 – 0.01
`1.04 – 0.03
`1.03 – 0.01
`1.03 – 0.01
`
`BSA
`1.02 – 0.02
`1.03 – 0.01
`1.06 – 0.02
`1.06 – 0.02
`
`93
`
`the process of
`For a better understanding of
`incorporation of iodine into the protein molecules we
`have plotted (cid:147)master(cid:148) curves for each method and each
`type of protein. We define the (cid:147)master(cid:148) curve as the
`relative number of labeled protein molecules Npr*/Npr
`(labeling efficiency) versus
`the
`total number of
`radioactive and inactive iodine atoms (NI*/NI) in the
`reaction mixture. From a chemical point of view
`radioactive 125I and inactive iodine are identical.
`Therefore, to study the high iodine concentrations only a
`small part of radioactive 125I was used and the rest
`consisted of inactive iodine. The amount of labeled
`protein molecules after iodination (Npr*) and the initial
`amount of proteins (Npr) can be calculated by:
`A
`pr
`(cid:3)
`mN
`a
`M
`
`NN
`
`N
`
`pr
`
`*
`
`=
`
`(cid:1)
`
`N =
`pr
`
`pr
`
`pr
`
`I
`
`I
`
`*
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`where Apr [Bq] is the activity of the proteins after the
`iodination process, (cid:3) [s(cid:150)1] is the decay constant of 125I,
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`

`Y. M. EFIMOVA et al.: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS LABELED WITH 125I
`
`Fig. 2. Ratio of labeled proteins and the initial amount of protein molecules as a function of the total number of iodine atoms (inactive iodine plus
`active) in the reaction mixture (volume of reaction mixtures is given in (cid:147)Labeling procedures(cid:148)) for LSZ (a) and BSA (b); S Iodogen method, T
`Chloramine-T method, U Iodo Beads method. The relative errors of the measurements were a few percent and are not visible in these graphs. The
`solid lines are the averages of the fits for the three different procedures. The dashed lines indicate the numbers of tyrosine (the most sensitive for
`iodine) residues in the proteins
`
`94
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`

`Y. M. EFIMOVA et al.: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS LABELED WITH 125I
`
`Fig. 3. CD spectra of the native proteins (S) LSZ (a) and BSA (b) compared to the corresponding spectra
`after using different labeling methods: V Chloramine-T, W Iodogen, X Iodo Beads
`
`Table 2. Secondary structures of BSA and LSZ in native state, labeled with Iodogen, Iodo Beads andChloramine-T
`
`Structure
`
`Native
`
`LSZ
`Iodogen
`
`(cid:1)-Helix, %
`(cid:2)-Sheet, %
`(cid:2)-Turns, %
`Unordered, %
`
`28*
`20
`18
`34
`
`26
`22
`18
`34
`
`Iodo
`Beads
`24
`23
`19
`34
`
`Chlora-
`mine-T
`22
`25
`19
`34
`
`Native
`
`BSA
`Iodogen
`
`67
`7
`12
`14
`
`58
`8
`13
`21
`
`Iodo
`Beads
`59
`8
`13
`20
`
`Chlora-
`mine-T
`55
`9
`13
`23
`
`* In our experience, the relative error of the experiments within the same batch is a few percent.
`
`95
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`

`Y. M. EFIMOVA et al.: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS LABELED WITH 125I
`
`Table 3. Specific enzymatic activites with their standard deviations (determined from three measurements)
`of native LSZ and LSZ labeled by different methods
`
`Specific enzymatic activity,
`(cid:215)1000 units/mg
`
`Native LSZ
`15 – 1
`
`Chloramine-T
`12 – 1
`
`Iodogen
`11 – 1
`
`Iodo Beads
`15 – 1
`
`LSZ contains 3 tyrosine residues, BSA contains 19.
`The dashed lines in Fig. 2 indicate these numbers.
`Figure 2 shows that the experimentally found maxima of
`the substitution degrees of iodine atoms per protein
`molecules are scattered around these lines. It has to be
`mentioned that not only monoiodotyrosines can be
`formed but also diiodotyrosines. The relative ratios of
`mono- and di-iodotyrosines in different proteins have
`been a subject of controversy for some time.15,16 For
`example, human serum albumin (HSA)16 has 12
`tyrosine residues available for iodination. If the apparent
`substitution level is 100% up to 20–10% of the HSA
`tyrosines will be diiodinated. Assuming that BSA
`resembles HSA we have included a dotted line into Fig.
`2 which shows the correct maximum of iodine atoms per
`BSA molecule. The substitution degree of iodine atoms
`per LSZ molecule is even smaller, except
`for
`the
`Iodogen method, than the number of tyrosine groups in
`LSZ. We
`assumed that
`the probability to find
`diiodotyrosines in LSZ is quite low.
`
`Structural changes
`
`the
`that
`important
`is
`it
`As mentioned above,
`secondary structure of the labeled proteins is kept intact.
`Figure 3 shows the changes in CD spectra of LSZ and
`BSA after the use of different oxidizing agents. The
`simplest method of extracting secondary structure
`content from CD data is to assume that a spectrum is a
`linear combination of CD spectra of each contributing
`secondary structure type (e.g., (cid:147)pure(cid:148) alpha helix, (cid:147)pure(cid:148)
`beta, (cid:147)pure(cid:148) turn, etc.) weighted by its abundance in the
`polypeptide conformation. From CD spectra analysis it
`was concluded that the use of Chloramine-T results in
`some loss of the alpha-helix content in both LSZ and
`BSA. This was expected from the strong oxidizing
`agent. At the same time the beta-sheet contents do not
`change while the unordered portion slightly increases.
`Table 2 shows that Iodogen and Iodo Beads do not have
`a significant influence on the secondary structure of LSZ
`and BSA and can be considered as gentle oxidizing
`agents for protein iodination.
`
`Enzymatic activity test
`
`The effect of present of oxidizing agents on LSZ
`biological activity can be investigated by comparing the
`enzymatic activity before and after iodination. This test
`was performed for lysozyme which causes lysis of
`Micrococcus lysodeikticus. The decrease in turbidity of
`
`96
`
`after
`suspensions
`cell
`lysodeikticus
`Micrococcus
`addition of LSZ solution was measured in time. The
`specific enzymatic activities of native and labeled LSZ
`were calculated by Eq. (1). Results are presented in
`Table 3.
`A comparison of the specific enzymatic activities of
`labeled LSZ with LSZ in native state shows that labeling
`of LSZ with Iodo Bead method does not change the
`enzymatic specific activity. However,
`Iodogen and
`Chloramine-T labeling methods decrease the enzymatic
`activity of LSZ significantly.
`
`Conclusions
`
`The use of Chloramine-T, Iodogen and Iodo Beads
`as oxidizing agents in the radiolabeling of BSA and LSZ
`experiments shows the same efficiency of the methods
`and allows the production of iodinated proteins with
`different substitution levels of iodine atoms per protein
`molecule. From CD experiments it was concluded that
`Chloramine-T has an influence on the secondary
`structure of both proteins. The enzymatic activity test of
`LSZ has also revealed some changes in enzymatic
`activity of LSZ labeled with the use of Chloramine-T.
`Iodogen as oxidizing agent does not
`influence the
`secondary structure for both BSA and LSZ but it causes
`a decrease of the biological activity of LSZ as an
`enzyme. From any point of view the Iodo Bead seems to
`be the best oxidizing agent for protein iodination.
`
`References
`
`1. A. E. BOLTON, Radioiodination Techniques, 2nd ed., Amersham,
`England, 1985, p. 7.
`2. E. REGOECZI, Iodine-Labeled Plasma Proteins, Vol. I, CRC Press,
`1984, p. 35.
`3. P. R. SALACINSKI, C. MCLEAN, J. E. C. SYKES, Anal. Biochem.,
`117 (1981) 136.
`4. G. S. DAVID, R. A. REISFELD, Biochemistry, 13 (1974) 1014.
`5. J. M. WALKER, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 32,
`J.M. Walker, Human Press, Tonowa, NJ, 1994, p. 441.
`6. C. H. LI, J. Am. Chem. Soc., (1944) 66.
`7. W. M. HUNTER, F. C. GREENWOOD, Nature, 194 (1962) 495.
`8. N. SREERAMA, R. W. WOODY, J. Molec. Biol., 242 (1994) 497.
`9. P. MANALAVAN, W. C. JOHNSON, Anal. Biochem., 167 (1987) 76.
`10. R. W. WOODY, Eur. Biophys. J., 23 (1994) 253.
`11. W. C. JOHNSON, Proteins, 7 (1990) 205.
`12. S. W. PROVENCHER, J. GLOCKNER, Biochemistry, 20 (1981) 33.
`13. D. SHUGAR, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 8 (1952) 302.
`14. G. DELEAGE, program Dicroprot 2000 http://dicroprot-pbil.ibcp.fr
`15. B. K. SEON, O. A. ROHOLT, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 221 (1970) 114.
`16. R. F. PENNISI, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 213 (1967) 486.
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2051
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket