UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`Patent No. 8,399,413
`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN T. BENNETT IN SUPPORT OF PATENT
`OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JOHN T.
`BENNETT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`Patent No. 8,399,413
`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN T. BENNETT IN SUPPORT OF PATENT
`OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JOHN T.
`BENNETT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`I, John T. Bennett, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I obtained a B.A. from Dartmouth College in 1996, and a J.D. from
`
`Boston College Law School in 2000.
`
`2.
`
`I am currently a partner in the law firm of Goodwin Procter LLP, a
`
`position which I have held since 2008. Prior to that, I was an associate at the law
`
`firm of Palmer & Dodge. In my 15 years of practice, I have focused primarily on
`
`representing clients in patent litigations involving the chemical arts in United
`
`States district courts and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Through
`
`this work, I have gained extensive experience as a litigating attorney, particularly
`
`in patent cases.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`Massachusetts and am admitted to practice before the United States District Court
`
`for the District of Massachusetts, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
`
`Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and the United
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`4.
`
`Concurrently with this application, I am applying to appear pro hac
`
`vice in IPR2015-00643 and IPR2015-00830. I have not applied to appear pro hac
`
`vice in any other proceeding before the Office in the last three years.
`
`5.
`
`I have represented Teva generally in litigating a number of
`
`pharmaceutical patent cases, including as:
`
`
`
`
`D1
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`a. trial counsel in Teva Neuroscience, Inc., et al. v. Apotex Corp., et al., Case
`
`No. 2:11-cv-03076-CCC-JBC in the U.S. District Court for the District of New
`
`Jersey.
`
`b. trial and appellate counsel in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al. v. Teva
`
`Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Case No. 05-cv-1887-DMC in the U.S. District
`
`Court for the District of New Jersey.
`
`c. trial and appellate counsel in Aventis Pharma S.A., et al. v. Amphastar
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Case No. 5:03-cv-
`
`00887-MRP-PLA, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
`
`California.
`
`6.
`
`I have been litigating issues relating to Copaxone and/or GA for more
`
`than 6 years.
`
`7.
`
`I have represented Teva generally in litigating a number of cases
`
`related to GA/Copolymer 1, as well as the Copaxone 20mg product, including as:
`
`a. trial and appellate counsel in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al v. Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., Case No. 1:09-cv-08824-WHP in the U.S. District
`
`Court for the Southern District of New York.
`
`b. trial and appellate counsel in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al v. Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-07246-KBF in the U.S. District
`
`Court for the Southern District of New York.
`
`
`
`
`D2
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`8.
`
`I have substantial familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. Patent Owner has asserted U.S. Patent No. 8,399,413 (“the ’413
`
`patent”), the patent at issue in this proceeding, against Petitioner and several other
`
`defendants in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals
`
`Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01278-GMS in the U.S. District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware (consolidated as In re Copaxone 40 MG Consolidated Cases,
`
`Case No. 1:14-cv-01171-GMS (D. Del.)). I serve as litigation counsel for Teva
`
`Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva
`
`Neuroscience, Inc. and Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd., in that
`
`litigation, as well as in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. v. Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00167-IMK in the U.S.
`
`District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. In the course of these
`
`proceedings, I have developed a strong familiarity with the ’413 patent, its
`
`prosecution history, the general subject matter to which the ’413 patent is directed,
`
`and the prior art references relied upon by Petitioner in support of its invalidity
`
`grounds in this proceeding. Furthermore, I have thoroughly reviewed the Petition
`
`and accompanying Exhibits submitted in this proceeding.
`
`9.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`
`
`
`D3
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00644
`
`10.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`11.
`
`I have never been subject to any sanction or contempt citation
`
`imposed by any court or administrative body.
`
`12.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`13.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`14.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct. I further declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under section 1001 of title 18 of the United States Code, and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issued
`
`thereon.
`
`Executed on: December 10, 2015
`
`/John T. Bennett/
`John T. Bennett
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D4
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2136
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
