throbber
Doubling the Dose of Glatiramer Acetate Does Not Increase Efficacy
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`MULTISPECIALTY
`
`Medscape Conference Coverage, based on selected sessions at the:
`World Congress on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis: 2008 Joint Meeting of the American,
`European, and Latin America Committees on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS,
`ECTRIMS, LACTRIMS)
`This activity is not sanctioned by, nor a part of, ACTRIMS, ECTRIMS, or LACTRIMS. Conference news does not receive grant support
`and is produced independently.
`
`Medscape Medical News
`Doubling the Dose of Glatiramer Acetate Does Not
`Increase Efficacy
`Alison Palkhivala
`September 22, 2008
`
`Comment
`Comment
`
`EDITORS' RECOMMENDATIONS
`
`Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
`Improves Fatigue in MS Patients
`
`MS Patients May Benefit From Yoga
`
`To Stay, or Not to Stay, on
`Natalizumab in MS
`
`Topic Alert
`Receive an email from Medscape
`whenever new articles on this topic are
`available.
` Add Multiple Sclerosis to My Topic
`Alert
`
`RELATED DRUGS & DISEASES
`
`Brain Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Neuro-Ophthalmologic
`Manifestations of Multiple Sclerosis
`
`PrintPrint
`
`MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
`According to PHYSICIANS
`
`1. Best Evidence Yet!: Ejaculation
`Reduces Prostate Cancer Risk
`
`2. Statins Linked to Diabetes and
`Complications in Healthy Adults
`
`3. Evidence From Randomised Controlled
`Trials Did Not Support the Introduction
`of Dietary Fat Guidelines in 1977 and
`1983
`
`4. Low Vitamin D Tied to Testosterone Dip
`in Healthy Men
`
`5.
`
`'Morbid and Deadly' Drug Combinations
`to Avoid
`
`VIEW MORE
`
`September 22, 2008 (Montreal, Quebec) — Doubling the dose of
`glatiramer acetate from 20 to 40 mg/mL did not improve clinical or
`imaging outcomes after a year of therapy in patients with multiple
`sclerosis (MS).
`
`Both doses of the drug performed very well, although the higher
`dose appeared to reduce the number of gadolinium-enhancing and
`new T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sooner,
`according to research presented here at the World Congress on
`Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis: 2008 Joint Meeting
`of the American, European, and Latin America Committees on
`Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS,
`ECTRIMS, LACTRIMS). Lead author Giancarlo Comi, MD, a
`professor of neurology and chair of the neurology department at
`the University Vita Salute, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, in
`Milan, Italy, presented the results.
`
`For the phase 3 trial multicenter FORTE trial, 1155 patients with
`definite MS, based on revised McDonald criteria, were randomized
`to treatment with 20 mg/mL or 40 mg/mL of glatiramer acetate
`administered once daily by subcutaneous injection for 12 months.
`All patients had experienced at least 1 documented relapse in the
`year prior to screening or 2 relapses in the 2 years prior to
`screening and had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score
`between 0 and 5.5. They were followed up at months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9,
`and 12. The primary end point was the rate of confirmed relapse.
`
`Overall, 91% of those on the low dose of the drug and 86% on the high dose completed 12 months of therapy.
`Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, after 12 months of therapy, the rate of confirmed relapse was 0.33 with
`the low dose and 0.35 with the high dose (P = 0.4859). Similarly, there was little difference between the 2
`groups with respect to the proportion of relapse-free patients, the number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions,
`the number of T2 lesions, and the amount of brain atrophy.
`
`"We expected that doubling the dose would significantly increase the effect, and this is not true. End of story,"
`Dr. Comi told Medscape Neurology & Neurosurgery. "But we had 2 positive aspects of the trial, with a
`tremendous amount of patients — [nearly] 1200 patients — with both doses. If you look at the change from
`baseline to the end, there was a 70% drop in the MRI activity. So, if we need a confirmation that glatiramer
`acetate is very active, this is the confirmation. Previous studies had [only] 200 to 300 patients."
`
`In addition, the higher dose of the drug affected the MRI findings more quickly. "With the high dose, there was
`an anticipation of the effect," said Dr. Comi. "By the end of the third month, it didn't matter which dose you
`had, you are in the same condition. However, you accumulate more lesions in the first 3 months with the low
`dose than with the high dose. So, if you want to have a quicker response to the treatment, then the high dose
`may have some advantages."
`
`Notably, the higher dose was just as safe as the lower dose, with only a small amount of increased treatment
`discontinuation due to injection-site reactions with the higher dose. Given that both doses are safe, Dr. Comi
`suggested that it might be useful to give some patients the higher dose for only a month or 2. "Sometimes
`patients start with very active disease, and you are afraid to wait 2 to 3 months to have a complete effect," he
`said.
`
`Enough is Enough?
`
`http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/580865
`
`01/06/2015
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2128
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`
`Doubling the Dose of Glatiramer Acetate Does Not Increase Efficacy
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Asked for comment on these findings, session moderator Askel Siva, MD, a professor of neurology at Istanbul
`University Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, in Turkey, told Medscape Neurology & Neurosurgery that he
`disagreed with this last assessment, however. "How much are we really gaining from 1 or 2 months [with a
`higher dose of glatiramer acetate]? I'm not sure," he said. "Maybe treating these patients with something else
`at the beginning would do the same thing or even more."
`
`"It seems that there might be a certain dose [for all MS medications at which you attain] satiety in the
`receptors," Dr. Siva concluded. "Then, enough is enough, and you don't need more. The current dose of
`glatiramer acetate that we are treating our patients with is enough."
`
`This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Dr. Comi has received personal compensation for
`consulting and speaking from Novartis, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck-Serono,
`Biogen-Dompè, Admiral, and Bayer Schering.
`
`World Congress on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis: 2008 Joint Meeting of the American,
`European, and Latin America Committees on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis: Abstract 79.
`Presented September 20, 2008.
`
`Comment
`Comment
`
`Commenting is limited to medical professionals. To comment please Log-in.
`Commenting is moderated. See our Terms of Use.
`
`Medscape Medical News © 2008 Medscape
`
`Cite this article: Alison Palkhivala. Doubling the Dose of Glatiramer Acetate Does Not Increase
`Efficacy. Medscape. Sep 22, 2008.
`
`About Medscape
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`Terms of Use WebMD
`
`Medscape France
`
`Medscape Deutschland
`
`MedicineNet
`
`eMedicineHealth
`
`RxList WebMD Corporate
`
`Help
`
`All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2015 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
`
`MORE
`
`http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/580865
`
`01/06/2015
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2128
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket