throbber
Published April 5, 2004
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`⫹
`⫹
`CD25
`Loss of Functional Suppression by CD4
`T Cells in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
`
` Regulatory
`
`Vissia Viglietta, Clare Baecher-Allan, Howard L. Weiner, and David A. Hafler
`
`Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
`Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
`
`Abstract
`⫹
`⫹
`CD4
`CD25
` regulatory T cells contribute to the maintenance of peripheral tolerance by active
`suppression because their deletion causes spontaneous autoimmune diseases in mice. Human
`⫹
` regulatory T cells expressing high levels of CD25 are suppressive in vitro and mimic the
`CD4
`⫹
`⫹
`CD25
` regulatory T cells. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory
`activity of murine CD4
`disease thought to be mediated by T cells recognizing myelin protein peptides. We hypothe-
`⫹
`CD25
` regulatory T cells play a role in the breakdown of
`sized that altered functions of CD4
`hi
`immunologic self-tolerance in patients with MS. Here, we report a significant decrease in the
`⫹
`CD25
` regulatory T cells from peripheral blood of patients with MS
`effector function of CD4
`hi
`as compared with healthy donors. Differences were also apparent in single cell cloning experiments
`⫹
`CD25
` T cells was significantly reduced in patients
`in which the cloning frequency of CD4
`hi
`as compared with normal controls. These data are the first to demonstrate alterations of
`⫹
`CD25
` regulatory T cell function in patients with MS.
`CD4
`hi
`
`Key words:
`
`tolerance • autoreactive T cells • autoimmune disease • L-selectin
`
`Introduction
`Clonal deletion of self-reactive T cells in the thymus
`and induction of T cell anergy do not alone explain the
`maintenance of immunologic self-tolerance, as potentially
`pathogenic auto-reactive T cells are present in the periphery
`of healthy individuals (1, 2). Thus, other regulatory mech-
`anisms exist to prevent autoreactive T cells from causing
`immune disorders. Active suppression by regulatory T
`cells plays a key role in the control of self-antigen–reactive
`T cells and the induction of peripheral tolerance in vivo
`(3, 4). Seminal experiments performed by Sakaguchi et al.
`⫹
`⫹
`CD25
` suppressor
`have shown that depletion of CD4
`cells results in the onset of systemic autoimmune diseases
`in mice (5). Furthermore, cotransfer of these cells with
`⫹
`⫺
`CD25
` cells prevents the development of experi-
`CD4
`mentally induced autoimmune diseases such as coli-
`tis, gastritis, insulin-dependent autoimmune diabetes, and
`thyroiditis (6–10). We and others have recently described
`⫹
`CD25
` regulatory T cells in human
`a population of CD4
`hi
`⫹
`CD25
`peripheral blood and thymus (11–13). Human CD4
`hi
`⫹
`⫹
`T cells, similar to the mouse CD4
`CD25
` suppressor
`
`V. Viglietta and C. Baecher-Allan contributed equally to this work.
`Address correspondence to David A. Hafler, Laboratory of Molecular
`Immunology, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s
`Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Ave. Louis Pasteur, Boston,
`MA 02115. Phone: (617) 525-5330; Fax: (617) 525-5333; email:
`dhafler@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
`
`cells, are anergic to in vitro antigenic stimulation and
`strongly suppress the proliferation of responder T cells
`⫹
`⫹
`CD25
` T cells are among the
`upon coculture (14). CD4
`best-characterized immunoregulatory subsets shown to pre-
`vent activation and effector function of activated responder
`T cells (15).
`Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease
`characterized by lymphocyte infiltration and inflammation
`of the central nervous system (CNS) white matter. T cells
`recognizing myelin protein peptides are likely involved in
`the pathogenesis of the disease (16–18). Although autore-
`active T cells are present in healthy individuals and patients
`with autoimmune disorders, autoreactive T cells found in
`patients with autoimmune disease are more easily acti-
`vated as compared with those from normal subjects (19–
`22). This finding led us to hypothesize that either deficient
`⫹
`CD25
`generation or reduced effector function of CD4
`hi
`T cells play a role in regulating the autoimmune response
`in patients with MS. Thus, we compared the frequency
`⫹
`CD25
` T regulatory cells derived
`and function of CD4
`hi
`from a group of untreated patients who have relapsing/
`remitting (RR) MS with those from age matched healthy
`control subjects.
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: CNS, central nervous system; MBP, myelin
`
`basic protein; MS, multiple sclerosis; RR, relapsing/remitting.
`
`971
`
`
` The Rockefeller University Press • 0022-1007/2004/04/971/9 $8.00
`J. Exp. Med.
`Volume 199, Number 7, April 5, 2004 971–979
`http://www.jem.org/cgi/doi/10.1084/jem.20031579
`
`The Journal of Experimental Medicine
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`Materials and Methods
`Subjects.
`We enrolled 15 patients in this study with definite
`MS upon informed consent. This work was approved by the In-
`stitutional Review Board at the Brigham and Women’s Hospi-
`tal. The patients were between the ages of 25 and 57 yr, and all
`had RR disease with Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale
`scores between 0 and 2.5. Patients were not treated with any im-
`munomodulatory drugs and did not receive corticosteroids
`within 3 mo of study entry. 21 normal healthy donors between
`the ages of 24 and 57 yr and with no history of autoimmune dis-
`eases were also enrolled in the study. Three healthy subjects be-
`tween the ages of 20–30 received the influenza virus vaccina-
`tion, and blood was drawn at the time points outlined in the
`Results section.
`Cell Culture Reagents.
`Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640
`-glutamine,
`medium supplemented with 5 mM Hepes, 2 nM
`l
`␮
`g/ml streptomycin (BioWhittaker),
`100 U/ml penicillin, 100
`0.5 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mM of nonessential amino acids
`(GIBCO BRL), and 5% human AB serum (Omega Scientific
`Inc.) in U-bottom 96-well plates (CoStar).
`
`⫺
`⫹
`⫹
`Cell Purification.
` T
`CD25
` and CD4
`CD25
`Human CD4
`hi
`cells were separated on a FACSVantage™ SE (BD Biosciences) cell
`sorter. PBMCs were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Bio-
`⫻
` 10
` cells for
`sciences) gradient centrifugation. Approximately 2
`8
`each experiment were incubated for 1 h in the culture medium,
`␮
`l anti–CD4-CyChrome (cat. no. 555348, IgG1; BD
`with 300
`Biosciences), anti–CD25-PE (cat. no. IM0479, IgG2a; Immuno-
`tech), and a cocktail of anti-CD14 (cat. no. 30544X, IgG2a), anti-
`␮
`l anti-CD116 (cat. no.
`CD32 (cat. no. 30934X, IgG2b), and 20
`18774B, IgM), all FITC labeled (BD Biosciences). Control
` cells each) were also stained with the aforemen-
`PBMCs (10
`6
`tioned antibodies in combination with different mouse IgGs
`(IgG2a PE-labeled cat. no. 55574; IgG1 CyChrome-labeled cat.
`no. 555750; IgG1 FITC-labeled cat. no. 555748; IgG2a FITC-
`labeled cat. no. 555573, and IgG2b FITC-labeled cat. no. 555742;
`all purchased from BD Biosciences). Lymphocytes were washed
`and sorted according to their forward and side scatter properties,
`excluding large activated cells. T cell–depleted accessory cells were
`obtained by negative selection of PBMCs incubated with anti-
`CD2–coated beads (111.13; Dynal) and irradiated at 3,300 rad.
`
`Figure 1. Human CD4⫹CD25hi T cells mediate
`suppression of CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder cell proliferation.
`(A) The regulatory properties of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells
`were examined from 21 healthy individuals or (B) from
`15 patients with RR MS. CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder (䊏)
`and CD4⫹CD25hi suppressor (䉱) cells (2.5 ⫻ 103 cells/
`well) were stimulated with plate-bound anti-CD3 (0.1
`and 0.5 ␮g/ml). CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells were cocultured
`with CD4⫹CD25hi T cells at a 1:1 ratio (䊊). T cell–
`proliferative responses are expressed as the mean ⫾ SE
`of triplicate cultures. Culture supernatants were diluted
`and analyzed to determine the cytokine profile. In the
`series of experiments shown on the left, cytokine secre-
`tion was not measurable. In the subsequent series,
`IFN␥ and IL-10 were detected; their values, representing
`the mean ⫾ SE of triplicate cultures, are expressed as
`ng/ml.
`
`972
`
`Loss of CD4
`+
`
`CD25
`+
`
` Regulatory T Cell Function in Human Autoimmune Disease
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`⫹
`⫺
`⫹
`Proliferation Assay.
` (responders) and CD4
`CD25
`CD4
`⫻
`CD25
` (suppressors) T cells (2.5
` 10
`cells/well) were stimu-
`3
`hi
`lated with plate-bound anti-CD3 (clone UCHT1; BD Bio-
`sciences) used at three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and
`␮
`⬚
`g/ml, coated in PBS for 2–4 h at 37
`C), or soluble anti-
`2.5
`␮
`g/ml) together with soluble anti-
`CD3 (clone HIT3a at 5
`␮
`g/ml) in U-bottom 96-well plates.
`CD28 (clone 28.2 at 5
`⫹
`⫺
`CD25
` T cells were also cocultured with decreasing num-
`CD4
`⫹
`CD25
` T cells (responder/suppressor ratios: 1:1,
`bers of CD4
`hi
`1:1/2, 1:1/4, and 1:1/8). All cells were cultured in a final volume
`␮
`l in the presence of 10
` T cell–depleted accessory cells/
`of 200
`4
`␮
`l of supernatant was removed
`well. After 5 d of culture, 100
`␮
`Ci
`from each well and used for cytokine detection, and 1
`H]thymidine (NEN Life Science Products) was added to each
`[
`3
`well. The cells were harvested after 16 h; cpm/well was deter-
`mined by scintillation counting (PerkinElmer). Mixing experi-
`ments were performed in the presence of fixed accessory cells au-
`⫹
`⫺
`CD25
` responder T cells.
`tologous to the CD4
`Measurement of Cytokine Level.
`The supernatants removed
`H]thymidine addition were diluted and
`from each well before [
`3
`analyzed to determine the cytokine profile by ELISA using Im-
`mulon 4 ELISA plates (Dynex Technologies). Antibody pairs
`␥
` were purchased from Endogen. Abs for
`and standards for IFN
`IL-13 and IL-10 were purchased from BD Biosciences. Avidin–
`peroxidase conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich) and tetramethylbenzidine
`peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories) were
`used to develop the assay. For IL-6 detection, the Human In-
`flammatory Cytometric Bead Array kit obtained from BD Bio-
`sciences was used.
`
`⫹
` Clones.
`CD25
`Generation of CD4
`PBMCs were stained
`hi
`with the aforementioned antibodies for flow cytometry. The
`⫹
`⫹
`⫺
`CD25
` and CD4
`CD25
` cells were single cell sorted
`CD4
`hi
`into 96-well plates. The cells were stimulated (modification of
`method described by Levings et al.; reference 23) with PHA
`␮
`g/ml, autologous PBMCs (6,000 rad) were
`(Boehringer) at 0.05
`⫻
` 10
` cells/well, JY cells (10,000 rad) were stim-
`stimulated at 3
`4
`cells/well, and IL-2 (Teceleukin; National Cancer
`ulated at 10
`4
`Institute) were stimulated at 100 U/ml. Half the medium was re-
`placed at day 7, and every 3–4 d thereafter it was replaced with
`fresh medium containing 100 U/ml IL-2. The cultures were re-
`␮
`g/ml PHA, a mixture of irradiated autolo-
`stimulated with 0.05
`⫻
`⫻
` 10
` cells/well) and allogeneic (1–3
` 10
` cells/well)
`gous (1–3
`4
`4
`PBMCs, and 100 U/ml IL-2. After 2–3 wk, growing clones were
`tested for regulatory activity as defined by suppression of cocul-
`tured anti-CD3–mediated T cell proliferation and the cloned cell
`dependence on exogenous IL-2 for proliferation. With these ex-
`periments, we further confirmed the data from Levings et al.
`⫹
`CD25
`showing the possibility of single cell cloning of CD4
`hi
`regulatory cells. Clones were analyzed in cocultures containing
`⫻
`⫻
`⫹
`⫺
` 10
` autologous CD4
`CD25
` T cells or 4
` 10
` PBMCs/well
`4
`3
`3
`⫻
` 10
` cloned cells/well. Stimulation was provided by the
`and 2
`3
`addition of magnetic beads with covalently attached anti-CD3
`␮
`g/10
`(UCHT1, bound to tosyl-activated magnetic beads at 1
`7
`beads; Dynal Biotech Inc.). The beads were added to the cultures
`⫻
` 10
` cells/well.
`[H]Thymidine was added to the cultures
`at 1.5
`4
`3
`after 4 d of stimulation. Percent suppression was determined as
`⫺
` (cpm incorporated in the coculture)/cpm of responder pop-
`1
`ulation alone) ⫻ 100%.
`
`973
`
`Viglietta et al.
`
`Figure 1 (continued)
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`Statistical Analysis. The mean ⫾ SE thymidine uptake and cy-
`tokine secretion of triplicate cultures was calculated for each ex-
`perimental condition. The response of CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells were
`normalized to 100 to calculate the percent suppression resulting
`from the addition of CD4⫹CD25hi to the cultures. The Mann-
`Whitney test was used to evaluate possible differences in the
`CD4⫹CD25hi function between patients with MS and healthy do-
`nors. The number of wells that produced growth from the clon-
`ing of cells derived from patients with MS and healthy controls
`was compared using hierarchical logistic regression analysis.
`
`Results
`CD4⫹CD25hi T Cells Are Present with the Same Frequency
`in Healthy Donors and Patients with MS. We stained whole
`mononuclear cells from freshly drawn human blood
`with different combination of anti-CD4–CyChrome, anti-
`CD25–PE, and a cocktail of FITC-labeled anti-CD14,
`anti-CD32, and anti-CD116 antibodies. The cells were
`gated on lymphocytes via their forward and side scatter fea-
`tures, and all FITC-labeled cells were negatively selected
`during sorting. Human peripheral blood contains a hetero-
`geneous population of CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells that express
`either moderate levels of CD25 consisting of nonregulatory
`T cells or high levels of CD25 that exhibit regulatory func-
`tion (24). As there are no other known cell surface markers
`able to identify regulatory T cells ex vivo, we used CD25
`expression to discriminate regulatory T cells in humans.
`We analyzed the mean fluorescent intensity of the CD25⫹
`population in both patients with MS and control subjects
`and found no differences between the two groups. Simi-
`larly, no differences in the frequency of CD4⫹CD25hi T
`cells were found between patients and healthy controls;
`ⵑ10% of CD4 T cells express the ␣-chain of IL-2 receptor
`CD25, whereas only 1–2% of the CD4 T cells are CD25hi
`in both subject groups. The mean of frequency was 1.4% ⫾
`0.3 in the healthy control group and 1.2% ⫾ 0.2 in the MS
`patient group; no statistically significant differences were
`found between the two populations (P ⫽ 0.21).
`CD4⫹CD25hi Regulatory T Cells Display Impaired Function
`in Patients with MS. Because it was critical to examine
`the regulatory T cell function, we isolated highly pure
`CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory and CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder cell
`
`populations by high speed flow cytometric sorting. CD4⫹
`CD25⫺ responder cells from both patients with MS and
`healthy individuals responded similarly in a dose-dependent
`fashion to varying concentration of plate-bound anti-CD3
`mAb. CD4⫹CD25hi T cells isolated from both groups were
`anergic to stimulation at all doses of plate-bound anti-CD3,
`indicating that CD4⫹CD25hi T cells isolated from patients
`with MS do exhibit this regulatory property.
`To quantitate their regulatory function, CD4⫹CD25hi T
`cells were cocultured with autologous responder cells (2.5 ⫻
`103 cells/well) at different ratios (responder/suppressor
`ratios: 1:1, 1:1/2, 1:1/4, and 1:1/8). As reported previously
`in healthy individuals, CD4⫹CD25hi T cells consistently
`suppressed proliferation at a 1:1 ratio (Figs. 1 A and 2). In-
`creasing the ratio of responder/suppressor T cells resulted
`in less suppression (Fig. 2). In striking contrast, the regula-
`tory CD4⫹CD25hi T cells isolated from the circulation
`of patients with MS (while similar in frequency as com-
`pared with healthy controls) poorly inhibited responder
`CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cell proliferation (Figs. 1 B and 2). Be-
`cause we have shown previously that increased strength of
`signal inhibits regulation (24), we stimulated cocultures of
`regulatory and responder T cells from patients with MS and
`healthy controls with a maximal concentration (2.5 ␮g/ml)
`of plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb. As predicted, the CD4⫹
`CD25hi regulatory T cells no longer suppressed the prolif-
`eration of responder T cells (Fig. 2).
`We also examined the production of cytokines in all
`the cultures and the ability to inhibit their secretion by
`CD4⫹CD25hi T cells cocultured with CD4⫹CD25⫺ re-
`sponder cells. The secretion of the Th1 cytokine IFN␥, as
`would result from the activation of destructive, autoreactive
`T cells, was suppressed in CD4⫹CD25hi T cell cocultures
`from healthy controls, but not in cocultures derived from pa-
`tients with MS (Fig. 1, A and B). Because there was no de-
`tectable secretion of IL-13 at the cell numbers used in these
`experiments, those data are unpublished. IL-10 was variably
`secreted, predominantly by the CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells. The
`secretion of IL-10 was often reduced upon coculture with
`CD4⫹CD25hi T cells, excluding a potential role of this cyto-
`kine in mediating this regulatory suppressor function (Fig. 1,
`A and B). In this ex vivo model of suppression, blocking IL-
`
`of
`Summary
`2.
`Figure
`CD4⫹CD25hi T cell regulatory
`function that is altered in patients
`with MS. The mean percent inhi-
`bition of the proliferative response
`by CD4⫹CD25hi cells derived
`from 15 MS patients (䊊) and
`21 healthy controls (䊏) was
`calculated. CD4⫹CD25⫺ and
`CD4⫹CD25hi populations were
`stimulated with plate-bound
`anti-CD3 mAb, alone or cocul-
`tured at varying ratios. The pro-
`liferative response was inhibited
`upon addition of CD4⫹CD25hi cells to the CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder cells at a 1:1 ratio in normal controls. Regulatory T cells from patients with MS
`exhibited significantly less suppressor activity. Decreasing the number of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells (responder/suppressor ratios: 1:1/2 and 1:1/4) resulted in
`less suppression in all the conditions examined.
`
`974
`
`Loss of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Function in Human Autoimmune Disease
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`the autologous and the converse target cells isolated from
`either healthy subjects or patients with MS. Regulatory T
`cells from patients with MS could not suppress the prolifer-
`ative response of target responder T cells from either pa-
`tients or healthy controls (suppression ⱕ23%). In contrast,
`in the reciprocal experiments, regulatory CD4⫹CD25hi T
`cells from healthy controls suppressed the proliferative re-
`sponse of target CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells derived from both
`controls and patients with MS (suppression ⱖ78%; Fig. 3).
`These data indicate that the primary regulatory defect is in
`the function of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells isolated from the cir-
`culation of patients with MS.
`CD62L Expression on CD4⫹CD25hi Regulatory T Cells.
`Although there were no differences in the frequency of
`CD4⫹CD25hi T cells or in their proliferation or cytokine
`secretion in response to different stimuli between healthy
`subjects and patients with MS, it was important to deter-
`mine whether an increase in the frequency of activated
`CD4⫹ T cells in the circulation of patients with MS may be
`diluting the regulatory CD4⫹CD25hi T cells. Therefore,
`we further restricted the isolation of T regulatory cells by
`sorting only those CD4⫹CD25hi T cells that expressed
`CD62L because L-selectin expression is down-regulated
`upon activation. We isolated CD4⫹CD25hiCD62L⫹ and
`total CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory T cells from healthy subjects
`and patients with MS and found that, whereas in the
`healthy controls both populations were able to suppress the
`proliferative response to anti-CD3 stimulation, neither
`population of regulatory cells isolated from patients with
`MS was able to inhibit the proliferation of the CD4⫹
`CD25⫺ responder population (Fig. 4). The fact that the
`CD4⫹CD25hiCD62L⫹ T cells isolated from patients are
`depleted of the potentially activated CD62L⫺ T cells yet
`still unable to suppress indicates that the impaired regula-
`tory T cell function in patients with MS is not due to con-
`tamination by activated T cells.
`In Vivo Immunization Did Not Alter CD4⫹CD25hi Regula-
`tory T Cell Function. To further rule out the possibility
`that impaired suppressive function observed in patients
`with MS was due to an increase in the frequency of acti-
`vated CD4⫹ T cells in the circulation or due to an altered
`activation state of the responder cells, we examined the
`
`Figure 3. CD4⫹CD25hi T cells from patients with MS do not inhibit
`proliferation of responder T cells isolated from either the autologous
`individual or healthy donors. CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder T cells and
`CD4⫹CD25hi cells from MS patients and normal controls were stimulated
`with plate-bound anti-CD3 at 0.5 ␮g/ml. 2.5 ⫻ 103 cells/well responder T
`cells from MS patients were cocultured with the same number of autologous
`CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory T cells (1st bar) or with regulatory cells isolated
`from healthy donors (2nd bar). Conversely, responder T cells from
`healthy donors were cocultured either with CD4⫹CD25hi cells derived
`from the same subject (3rd bar), or with regulatory cells isolated from
`patients with MS (4th bar).
`
`10 or TGF␤ does not result in loss of suppressor function by
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ regulatory T cells (unpublished data).
`Recent studies have shown that the presence of IL-6 can
`contribute to the loss of CD4⫹CD25⫹ suppression (25).
`We measured the levels of IL-6 secretion in the cultures of
`five healthy individuals and four patients with MS to inves-
`tigate its potential role in the lack of suppression observed
`with patient-derived cells. We found that IL-6 levels did
`not correlate with the presence or absence of CD4⫹CD25hi
`T cell–mediated suppression.
`It was also important to examine whether the loss of reg-
`ulatory function was due to a decrease in CD4⫹CD25hi T
`cell function or an increase in the resistance of activated
`CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder T cells to inhibition. Thus, we
`performed mixing experiments in which patient and con-
`trol regulatory CD4⫹CD25hi T cells were cocultured with
`
`Figure 4. The CD62L⫹ subset of CD4⫹CD25hi
`regulatory T cells exhibits decreased suppressive function
`in patients with MS. CD4⫹CD25hiCD62L⫹ T cells
`were isolated from seven healthy individuals (left) and
`three patients with MS (right). Each symbol is repre-
`sentative of a different individual. Total CD4⫹CD25hi
`T cells were also isolated from four out of seven
`healthy subjects and two out of three patients. The
`percent suppression of coculture proliferation in re-
`sponse to plate-bound anti-CD3 was calculated in
`each individual. The CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory T cells
`derived from healthy controls were able to induce
`strong inhibition of the proliferative response (55–97%
`suppression) as shown previously. The CD62L⫹ subset
`of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells derived from the same individuals exhibit enhanced suppressive capacity. In contrast, the regulatory cells derived from patients,
`although depleted of CD62L⫺ activated T cells, show decreased inhibitory function (4–29% suppression) as compared with the suppression observed in
`healthy individuals.
`
`975
`
`Viglietta et al.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`compared with plate-bound anti-CD3 and, thus, was more
`significantly inhibited upon coculture with CD4⫹CD25hi.
`It was of interest to examine whether differences in sup-
`pressor function by CD4⫹CD25hi cells between patients
`with MS and control subjects would be observed with
`qualitative changes in TCR signaling. Cocultures of regu-
`latory and responder T cells from patients and controls
`were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. As
`expected, the magnitude of the proliferative response was
`significantly lower than that obtained with plate-bound
`anti-CD3 from the same individual. The CD4⫹CD25⫺ T
`cells isolated from patients and controls responded similarly
`to this stimulus. Yet, in contrast to plate-bound anti-CD3,
`the qualitatively different TCR signal delivered by soluble
`anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 allowed the appearance of sup-
`pressor function by cocultured CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory T
`cells derived from patients with MS, particularly at higher
`ratio of regulatory T cells in the culture (Fig. 5).
`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`regulatory function of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells derived from
`healthy subjects recently immunized with the influenza vi-
`rus vaccine. The regulatory T cells from three subjects ex-
`amined after vaccination showed intact suppressive ability
`(93, 84, and 65% suppression of proliferation). One indi-
`vidual was examined both before and after vaccination and
`demonstrated no differences in the suppressive ability (68%
`suppression before and 65% after vaccination). These data
`provide evidence that an ongoing immune response does
`not affect the intrinsic ability of CD4⫹CD25hi regulatory T
`cells to function.
`CD4⫹CD25hi Regulatory T Cells in Other Autoimmune
`Diseases. We examined the regulatory activity of CD4⫹
`CD25hi T cells isolated from a small series of patients with
`other autoimmune diseases to confirm our hypothesis that
`the changes in function of these regulatory CD4⫹CD25hi T
`cells would not be specific to a single autoimmune disease.
`The frequency of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells in this control
`group was 1.4% ⫾ 0.4; no differences were found between
`these patients and the subjects with MS (P ⫽ 0.44) or the
`healthy individuals (P ⫽ 0.35). The regulatory cells derived
`from patients with thyroiditis and psoriasis showed reduced
`suppressive capacity (7 and 19%, respectively), whereas the
`regulatory activity of cells from the patients with inflam-
`matory bowel disease and ankylosing spondylitis showed
`strong suppressive activity (97 and 68%, respectively).
`These preliminary data suggest the need for a more exten-
`sive analysis of the role of the regulatory T cell subset in
`other autoimmune diseases and are consistent with our hy-
`pothesis that dysfunctions in regulatory T cells may be
`viewed as one of many risk factors in human autoimmune
`disorders.
`The Nature of TCR Signaling Determines Suppressor Func-
`tion. We have shown previously that a qualitatively dif-
`ferent stimulus, such as soluble anti-CD3 and anti-CD28,
`induced lower levels of responder T cell proliferation as
`
`Figure 5. The proliferative response in both patients and healthy controls
`is suppressed in cultures receiving T cell receptor signals of different natures.
`CD4⫹CD25⫺ responder T cells and CD4⫹CD25hi cells from six MS
`patients and six normal controls were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3
`and anti-CD28 (5 ␮g/ml) alone or cocultured at different responder/
`suppressor ratios (1:1, 1:1/2, and 1:1/4). The average proliferative response
`was 13,494 cpm in the patient group and 15,974 cpm in the control
`group. The percent inhibition of coculture proliferation was calculated in
`patients with MS (䊊) and healthy controls (䊏).
`
`Figure 6. Reduced ability to generate CD4⫹CD25hi clones from blood
`of MS patients. (A) CD4⫹CD25hi or CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells from patients
`with MS and healthy controls were cloned as described in Materials and
`Methods. The difference in the cloning frequency of the regulatory
`CD4⫹CD25hi cells between patients with MS and healthy subjects was
`highly significant (P ⬍ 0.0001), whereas the ability to generate clones
`from CD4⫹CD25⫺ cells was not different (P ⫽ 0.21). (B) T cell clones
`were tested for dependency on exogenous IL-2 by stimulation with anti-
`CD3 beads ⫾ IL-2 (data are presented as stimulation indices). The same
`clones were also tested for their ability to inhibit the proliferation of cocul-
`tured responder T cells upon stimulation with anti-CD3 beads. The three
`representative CD4⫹CD25hi clones (a–c) shown suppress the proliferation
`of autologous CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells, whereas a T cell clone (d) representing
`a minor population of the clones derived from the CD4⫹CD25hi population
`is shown, and all of the CD4⫹CD25⫺ clones (e) did not inhibit proliferation
`of cocultured T cells.
`
`976
`
`Loss of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Function in Human Autoimmune Disease
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2072
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`jem.rupress.org
`
` on November 4, 2014
`
`T cells while still demonstrating that they are CD25⫹ regu-
`latory T cells as opposed to activated responder cells ex-
`pressing CD25. Stimulation of cultures with soluble anti-
`CD3 and anti-CD28, which have previously shown to be
`the most permissive for enabling coculture suppression, gave
`equivalent levels of suppression in patients and control sub-
`jects when cocultured at 1:1 ratios. In contrast, the stimula-
`tion provided by plate-bound anti-CD3 at 0.1 and 0.5 ␮g/
`ml resulted in a threefold decrease of suppression by
`CD4⫹CD25hi cells derived from patients with MS as com-
`pared with normal controls. Previous experiments showed
`that delivering qualitatively different T cell receptor signals
`to responder T cells, such as that provided by self-antigens
`as compared with microbial antigens, results in a greater
`sensitivity to suppression. Thus, the present findings may
`help explain defects in suppression of autoreactive T cells in
`autoimmune patients as compared with T cells stimulated
`by microbial antigens during infections.
`Because it was of interest to examine the regulatory
`function of CD4⫹CD25high T regulatory cells in an anti-
`gen-specific system, we attempted to induce antigen-spe-
`cific responses to myelin basic protein (MBP) in this in
`vitro system. However, as expected with the low frequency
`of MBP-specific CD4⫹CD25⫺ effector T cells and the low
`number of CD4⫹CD25high T regulatory cells that can be
`isolated by FACS®, it was not possible to directly measure
`suppression of autoantigen-specific T cells in patients. As
`the frequency of MBP-specific T cells appears to be in the
`range of 1/106 cells, the majority of the effector T cells that
`in our assay are cultured at 1–2 ⫻ 104 cells/well do not re-
`spond to the antigen.
`An important control to note in all these experiments is
`the anergy or lack of thymidine incorporation resulting
`from stimulation of CD4⫹CD25hi T cells cultured alone.
`This anergy indicates that CD4⫹CD25hi T cells isolated
`from patients with MS are not CD25⫹-activated T cells be-
`cause such cells would not exhibit regulatory activity, but
`rather enhance proliferation. It was critical to determine
`whether the decrease in T cell regulatory function ob-
`served in patients with MS was due to a defect in the
`CD4⫹CD25hi T cell subset or whether the responder
`CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells were refractory to suppression. By
`performing comixing experiments, we could clearly dem-
`onstrate that the defect lies in the CD4⫹CD25hi T cell
`function, as opposed to enhanced responder T cell resis-
`tance in patients with MS.
`In mice thymectomized on day 3 of life, a spontaneous
`autoimmune disease develops that does not involve in-
`flammation in the CNS (5). This raises the question as to
`whether CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells can be involved in murine
`models of CNS autoimmunity, reflecting the observations
`made here in patients with MS. Thus, it is of interest that
`in a mouse model of MS, MOG35–55-specific experimental
`autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a similar population of
`CD4⫹CD25⫹ T cells, has been shown able to protect
`from both the onset and the progression of autoimmune
`demyelination induced by either active MOG35–55 immu-
`
`Published April 5, 2004
`
`Low CD4⫹CD25hi Cloning Frequency in Patients with MS.
`To examine potential mechanisms for the loss of reg-
`ulatory T cell function, we directly single cell sorted
`CD4⫹CD25hi and CD4⫹CD25⫺ cells from patients
`and healthy subjects and analyzed their frequency and
`functional activity. Although the cloning frequency of
`CD4⫹CD25⫺ T cells was similar in patients with MS and
`control subjects, the cloning frequency of CD4⫹CD25hi
`cells was significantly lower in patients with MS as com-
`pared with normal control subjects (Fig. 6 A). Due to the
`slow growth of the clones, we tested their regulatory ac-
`tivity after a second round of PHA/IL-2 stimulation. We
`examined IL-2–dependent TCR-mediated proliferation
`and inhibition of T cell proliferation as two major charac-
`teristics of regulatory T cells (Fig. 6 B). By these criteria,
`60% of the CD4⫹CD25hi clones generated from healthy
`controls and 17% of the clones derived from patients with
`MS exhibited regulatory activity.
`
`Discussion
`It has become clear that defects in different populations
`of regulatory T cells contribute to the induction of autoim-
`mune diseases in animal models. Here, we examined
`whether a similar defect in regulatory CD4⫹CD25hi T cells
`occurs in humans with MS. We observed a signi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket