throbber
Multiple Sclerosis 2002; 8: 299 ± 306
`
`www.multiplesclerosisjournal.com
`
`Cytokine production in T lymphocyte–microglia interaction is attenuated by
`glatiramer acetate: a mechanism for therapeutic efficacy in multiple
`sclerosis
`
`S Chabot1, FP Yong1, DM Le1, LM Metz1, T Myles1and VW Yong*,1,2
`1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Department of
`Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
`
`The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (MS) is thought to involve the production of Th2 regulatory lymphocytes that secrete
`anti-inflammatory cytokines; however, other mechanisms cannot be excluded. Given that activated T lymphocytes infiltrate into the CNS and
`become in close proximity to microglia, we evaluated whether glatiramer acetate affects the potential
`interaction between T cells and
`microglia. We report that the co-culture of activated T lymphocytes with microglia led to the induction of several cytokines, and that these
`were reduced by glatiramer acetate treatment. Morphological transformation of bipolar/ramified microglia into an activated ameboid form was
`attenuated by glatiramer acetate. These results reveal a novel mechanism for glatiramer acetate: the impairment of activated T cells to
`effectively interact with microglia to produce cytokines. The net result of a non-inflammatory milieu within the CNS,
`in spite of T cell
`infiltration, may help account for the amelioration of disease activity in MS patients on glatiramer acetate therapy.
`Multiple Sclerosis (2002) 8, 299–306
`
`Key words: cytokine; lymphocyte; microglia; neuroinflammation; therapeutics
`
`Introduction
`
`Glatiramer acetate (CopaxoneR) is a polymer of four amino
`acids (L-alanine, L-glutamate, L-lysine and L-tyrosine) with
`efficacy in the treatment of patients with relapsing-
`remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).1 ± 4 In an animal model
`of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
`(EAE), glatiramer acetate suppresses both the acute and
`chronic disease induced by several myelin proteins.5 ± 7
`The principal mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in
`MS is thought to involve antigen presentation (reviewed
`in Refs. [8,9]). In this regard, glatiramer acetate has been
`shown to compete with, or displace, myelin peptides from
`binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) mole-
`cules; to act as an altered peptide ligand of immunogenic
`epitopes of myelin basic protein; or as an antigen itself 10 ± 15
`Glatiramer acetate has also been described as an antago-
`nist at the T-cell receptor to the immunodominant epitope
`of MBP.16 Consequences of affecting antigen presentation
`include the apoptosis or functional inactivation (anergy)
`of encephalitogenic T helper 1 (Th1) lymphocytes that
`mediate the disease, and the formation of glatiramer
`acetate-specific Th2 suppressor/regulatory cells that pro-
`duce anti-inflammatory cytokines. The latter are thought
`to traffic into the CNS and participate in the attenuation
`of disease through bystander suppression.14,15,17,18 In sup-
`
`*Correspondence: VW Yong, PhD, Neuroscience Research
`Group, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
`T2N 4N1.
`E-mail: vyong@ucalgary.ca
`Received 29 October 2001; accepted 11 December 2001
`
`© Arnold 2002
`
`port of these concepts, mononuclear cells from MS sub-
`jects treated with glatiramer acetate show evidence of
`a shift from a pro-inflammatory Th1 cytokine profile to a
`Th2 bias.15,19 ± 23 Furthermore, copaxone reactive Th2 cells
`are found to accumulate in the CNS of experimental
`animals.14
`It is possible that other mechanisms may also account
`for the efficacy of glatiramer acetate in MS. When
`T lymphocytes enter the parenchyma of the CNS, they
`become in close proximity to microglia. Although it
`is thought
`that T cells become reactivated when they
`re-encounter antigen presented by microglia, direct
`interaction between activated T cells and microglia, inde-
`pendent of antigen presentation, may also occur. In recent
`studies, we demonstrated that activated human T cells
`and microglia can interact in a contact-dependent manner,
`whether these were syngeneic or allogeneic, in an appa-
`rently non-antigen-dependent
`fashion. This interaction
`tumour necrosis factor-a
`yields substantial amounts of
`(TNF-a),24 IL-10,25 IL-Ib,
`IL-4, IL-6, IL-12 and IL-13.26
`Given that TNF-a can be toxic to oligodendrocytes,27 ± 29
`the encounter of activated T lymphocytes with microglia
`can lead potentially to the oligodendrocyte/myelin pathol-
`ogy that is characteristic of MS. The upregulation of a
`variety of cytokines would further propagate an inflam-
`matory milieu within the CNS.
`In this manuscript, we have addressed whether the
`production of cytokines in T cell ± microglia interaction
`would be affected by glatiramer acetate. If so, this would
`represent a novel mechanism of glatiramer acetate in
`MS.
`
`10.1191/1352458502ms810oa
`
`
`
`msj.sagepub.comDownloaded from
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`300
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`Isolation of mononuclear cells and treatment with glatiramer
`acetate
`Heparinized blood was collected from normal volunteers,
`and subjected to Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia Biotech,
`Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) centrifugation to obtain peri-
`pheral blood mononuclear cells as described previously.24
`After two washes, cells were suspended at a density of 1 ± 2
`million/ml in horizontal T-25 flasks (Nunc, Becton Dickin-
`son, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) in the serum-free
`medium, AIM V (Gibco BRL, Burlington, Ontario, Canada),
`to which 1 mg/ml of an anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) was
`added. Three hours after the anti-CD3 addition, the T-25
`flasks were stood upright from their horizontal position in
`order to kill monocytes that had adhered. Floating cells,
`which were mostly lymphocytes, were left for a period of 72 h
`at 37°C. Flow cytometry analysis of the mononuclear cell
`population at this 72-h period indicated that CD3+ cells
`constituted about 90% of the total cell population, with
`approximately 60% CD4+ and 30% CD8+ ratio. B lympho-
`cytes (CD19+) and NK cells (CD56+) consisted of 5 ± 6% of
`the total mononuclear cell population, and no monocytes
`(CD14+) were detected. Henceforth, given that the majority
`of cells in the mononuclear population are T cells, these will
`be referred to as T lymphocytes.
`In experiments where glatiramer acetate (from TEVA
`Pharmaceutical Industries, Petach-Tikva, Israel; batches
`242993097 and 242994498) was used, this drug (5 ± 50
`mg/ml), diluted in phosphate-buffered saline, was added
`to cultures 3 h after the initiation of CD3 ligation, at the
`time that the T-25 flasks were altered from the horizontal to
`upright positions. Cells were left for 69 h at 37°C, then
`collected, counted and resuspended in fresh AIM-V at a
`density of 500,000 cells/ml. Following a second treatment
`with glatiramer acetate, cells were left at 37°C for an
`additional 3 h. Thereafter, 100 ml (thus, 50,000 cells) of
`cell suspension was added to individual wells of a 96-well
`plate already containing microglia or U937 monocytoid
`cells (see below). Thus, unless otherwise stated, most
`experiments involved 72-h treatment of T cells with glatir-
`amer acetate, administered at two time points. The purity
`of T cells after 72 h of glatiramer acetate treatment was not
`different from that of non-treated controls (unpublished
`results).
`We have pretreated T cells with glatiramer acetate as
`this simulates the exposure of leukocytes to this drug at
`sites of subcutaneous injection and at draining lymph
`nodes. The literature does not provide evidence that glatir-
`amer acetate itself can enter the CNS. Note also that the
`concentrations of glatiramer acetate that are used here are
`comparable to those used by other laboratories in tissue
`culture studies.15,20 ± 23
`
`MicrogliaÐT cell interactions
`Adult human microglia of over 95% purity was isolated
`from the resected brain tissue of patients undergoing surgi-

`cal resection to treat intractable epilepsy, as in previous
`104 microglia were plated per
`reports.24,25 A total of 2.5
`well of a 96-well plate. Microglia culture medium was
`
`minimum essential medium supplemented with 5% FCS,
`0.1% dextrose and 20 mg/ml gentamicin (all constituents
`from Gibco BRL). In microglia ± T cell interaction assays,
`100 ml containing 50,000 T cells in AIM-V (as described
`above) was added to individual wells of a 96-well plate
`already containing 25,000 microglia (or U937 monocytoid
`cells Ð see below) in 100 ml microglia culture medium.
`Twenty-four hours after, conditioned medium was collected
`for cytokine quantifications by ELISA.
`Fetal human microglia was isolated from brains obtained
`legal and therapeutic abortions using a protoc ol
`at
`described by Lee et al.30 Specimens ranged in gestational
`age from 14 to 20 weeks. The use of these and all other
`human materials has been approved by our local institu-
`tional ethics committee. Cells were used for interactions
`with T cells in a manner identical to that described for their
`adult counterparts.
`To complement the studies of primary human microglia
`cultures, we have used a human pro-monocytoid cell line.
`Cells in this U937 line become microglia-like, as assessed
`by morphology and expression of cell surface molecules,
`when treated sequentially with 50 ng/ml phorbol-12-
`myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (time 0 ± 48 h) and 100 U/ml
`interferon-g (IFNg ) (from 48 to 72 h).31 Cells were used
`1 ± 3 days after the IFNg treatment. As with microglia,
`50,000 T cells in AIM-V was added to individual wells of a
`96-well plate already containing 25,000 PMA/IFNg -treated
`U937 cells, and conditioned medium was collected after
`24 h of co-cultures.
`
`Cytokine protein quantification
`Cytokine protein levels in the conditioned medium of
`microglia ± T cell co-cultures were measured using enzyme-
`linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) kits bought from
`BioSource International (Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Assays
`were performed following manufacturer instructions.
`
`Figure 1 Glatiramer acetate pretreatment of T cells suppresses TNF
`a and IL 10 production that is generated in T cell adult human
`microglia interactions. T cells or adult microglia in isolation produce
`undetectable TNF a or IL 10. In co culture, both IL 10 and TNF a
`levels are significantly elevated and this is reduced dose dependently
`by glatiramer acetate (GA) pretreatment of T cells. Values are
`mean‹SEM of triplicate analyses; results have been reproduced in
`three series of experiments involving different microglia and blood
`donors. **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, one way ANOVA with Bonferroni
`post hoc comparisons
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`301
`
`with 0.2% gelatin, which evaluates b2-integrin adhesive
`function.32 Coating was performed with 100 ml per well at
`37°C overnight. The fluid was then removed, the wells were
`washed once with saline, and 50,000 T cells in 100 ml AIM-V
`medium were then added. These T cells had been pretreated
`for 3 days with glatiramer acetate after the anti-CD3 ligation
`as described above, or were untreated controls. After 1 h at
`37°C, the fluid from each well was removed and processed
`through a Coulter Z1 counter to enumerate the number of
`unadhered cells. Adherent cells were floated by 0.25%
`trypsin and similarly counted. Thus, the total number of
`T cells was elucidated from each well and the proportion
`that remained floating was tabulated.
`
`Figure 2 Glatiramer acetate treatment of T cells also lead to the
`suppression of IL 1b, IL 6 and IL 12 in T cell adult human microglia
`interactions. Both activated T cells and adult human microglia do not
`secrete detectable amounts of IL 1b and IL 12 into their culture
`medium. With co culture, levels of IL 1b and IL 12 are increase, to 17
`and 114 pg/ml, respectively. These inducible cytokines are dose
`dependently reduced by glatiramer acetate pretreatment of T cells. IL
`6 is a constitutively expressed cytokine that can be readily detected in
`culture medium of T cells or microglia in isolation. Glatiramer acetate
`treatment of T cells also attenuated the IL 6 levels found in T cell
`microglia co cultures (level of IL 6 in control T cell microglia co
`culture in this example: 368 pg/ml). *p<0.05, **p<0.01,
`***p<0.001, one way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons
`
`Adhesion assays
`Wells in 96-well plates were coated with 20 mg/ml fibronec-
`tin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), a b1-integrin substrate, or
`
`Results
`
`Glatiramer acetate decreases cytokine levels in co-cultures of
`T cells and adult human microglia
`When cultured in isolation,
`the medium of anti-CD3
`activated human T cells or adult human microglia con-
`tained undetectable amounts of TNF-a or IL-10 as assayed
`by ELISAs. In co-culture of T cells and adult human
`microglia, however, substantial levels of TNF-a and IL-10
`were elicited (Figure 1). Significantly, the pretreatment of
`T cells with glatiramer acetate prior to their encounter
`with adult microglia reduced, in a concentration-dependent
`manner, the levels of both cytokines (Figure 1). The effect of
`glatiramer acetate was principally on T cells since the
`pretreatment of microglia with glatiramer acetate (25 mg/ml,
`
`Figure 3 Morphology of microglia in T cell adult microglia co cultures. Adult human microglia are mostly bipolar in morphology in culture
`(A). T cells are present as single cells or clumps when plated into wells of a 96 well plate (B). When T cells are co cultured with microglia in the
`absence of glatiramer acetate, bipolar microglia become rounded/ameboid in morphology (C, some microglia are shown by arrows). This

`morphological transformation is prevented by glatiramer acetate pretreatment of T cells (D, with some bipolar microglia indicated by arrows).
`All frames are of the same original magnification,
`400
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`302
`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`co-culture of anti-CD3 activated T cells with adult micro-
`glia, IL-1b and IL-12 became detectable while levels of IL-6
`remained unaltered from their high basal amounts. Glatir-
`amer acetate pretreatment of T cells dose dependently
`attenuated the induction of IL-1b and IL-12 in T cell ±
`microglia co-cultures, and also suppressed the amounts of
`the constitutively expressed cytokine, IL-6 (Figure 2).
`We noted that when microglia encounter activated
`T cells, the morphology of microglia transforms from a
`ramified/bipolar morphology to an amoeboid rounded form
`(Figure 3). This is reminiscent of an activated microglia
`in vivo, which transforms progressively from a ramified
`resting morphology to an amoeboid form.36 However, when
`T cells were pretreated with glatiramer acetate (25 mg/ml),
`the morphological transformation of microglia in T cell ±
`microglia co-culture was attenuated. Overall, the lack of a
`morphological transformation of microglia is another indi-
`cation that glatiramer acetate pretreatment of T cells results
`in their decreased ability to interact with microglia to
`produce cytokines.
`
`Adhesion of T cells is not altered by glatiramer acetate
`A possible explanation of the reduction of cytokine produc-
`tion by glatiramer acetate in T cell ±microglia co-culture is
`that glatiramer-acetate-treated T cells were less able to
`adhere onto microglia compared to control T cells. Although
`this did not appear qualitatively to be the case as observed
`by examination of live cultures (Figure 3), we utilized an
`adhesion assay to test this possibility. Figure 4 demonstrates
`that glatiramer-acetate-pretreated T cells did not have a
`reduced tendency to adhere onto fibronectin or gelatin,
`which evaluated b1- and b2-integrin interaction, respec-
`tively.32 Similarly, the adhesion of T cells onto a monolayer
`of PMA/IFNg -treated U937 cells, a model of microglia (see
`next section), was not affected by glatiramer acetate (unpub-
`lished observations).
`
`Figure 5 Cytokine production in co cultures of T cells with fetal
`human microglia is reduced by glatiramer acetate. As with their
`adult counterparts,
`fetal human microglia in isolation produce
`negligible quantities of IL 10 and TNF a. In co cultures of T cells with
`microglia, increases of IL 10 and TNF a are elicited and these are
`reduced by the pretreatment of T cells with glatiramer acetate. Values
`are mean‹SEM of three analyses. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001,
`1 way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons
`
`Figure 4 The adhesive property of activated T cells is not altered by
`glatiramer acetate. Following 3 days of treatment of activated T cells
`with glatiramer acetate, 50,000 T cells were plated onto fibronectin
`(to evaluate b1 integrin function) or gelatin (b2 integrin) for 1 h. The
`proportion of cells that remained floating was enumerated and
`expressed as a percentage of the total adherent and floating cell
`population. None of the concentrations of glatiramer acetate affected
`adhesion when compared to controls (mean‹SEM of triplicates).
`This result was reproduced in three different sets of experiments
`
`for 1 ±3 d) did not influence cytokine production in sub-
`sequent T cell ± microglia interactions (results not shown).
`The effect of glatiramer acetate in reducing cytokine
`production in T cell ± adult microglia co-cultures is not
`the result of a decrease in the proliferation or survival of
`T cells. When the total number of T cells was counted after

`72 h of glatiramer acetate treatment, cell numbers were
`103) versus glatiramer ace-
`comparable in control (24‹2
`tate (5, 25 and 50 mg/ml) groups (26‹1, 26‹2 and 22‹1,

`103). It should be noted that while glatiramer
`respectively,
`acetate does affect the proliferation of lymphocytes, this
`generally requires a longer term of exposure (over 5 days) to
`drug in vitro.15,21,33 Furthermore, dye exclusion assays
`revealed no overt toxicity to T cells after 3 days of glatira-
`mer acetate treatment (unpublished observations). Finally,
`equal number of T cells was added to microglia in all test
`situations.
`We have addressed other features that could be impor-
`tant determinants for understanding the mechanisms by
`which glatiramer acetate affects T cell ±microglia interac-
`tions. First, T cells had to be activated with anti-CD3
`antibody since co-cultures of unactivated T cells (even in
`the presence of 50 U/ml IL-2) with microglia did not result
`in increased production of TNF-a. Moreover, it was neces-
`sary for T cells to be pretreated with glatiramer acetate
`since its reducing effect on cytokine production did not
`occur when added at the time of co-culture. Indeed, our
`current results indicate that the pretreatment period of T
`cells should be at least 24 h before these cells could alter
`cytokine production in T cell ± microglia interaction
`(unpublished observations).
`We evaluated further the expression of other cytokines
`implicated in MS, specifically IL-1b, IL-6 and IL-12.28,34,35
`Levels of IL-1b and IL-12 were undetectable in the condi-
`tioned media of T cells and adult microglia in isolation,
`while IL-6 was present in substantial amounts (between 200
`to 1000 pg/ml in six different sets of cultures). Following the
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`303
`
`mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in MS. By an
`effect on antigen presentation, glatiramer acetate is thought
`to cause the production of Th2 suppressor/regulatory cells,
`which then migrate into the CNS. Within the CNS, and
`upon antigen restimulation, the glatiramer acetate-specific
`cells produce anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokines, including
`IL-5, IL-10 and IL-13, which are thought to inhibit the
`expansion of autoreactive Th1 cells, through a process
`termed bystander suppression (Figure 7).
`The experiments of this manuscript were aimed at
`uncovering other mechanisms by which glatiramer acetate
`may work in MS.
`Activated T cells traffic into the CNS as part of the
`immunological surveillance mechanism of the CNS. It is
`thought that those that recognize antigens are expanded and
`retained within the CNS while those that do not either
`undergo apoptosis or leave the CNS. In MS, increased
`numbers of activated T cells transit into the CNS paren-
`chyma.34,37 EAE experiments have revealed that while the
`initial wave of T cells that enters the brain is auto-antigen
`specific, the majority (over 98%) of the later arriving acti-
`vated T cells have many different specificities; 39,40 similar
`kinetics are thought to occur in MS. In view of the large
`number of activated T cells of many specificities that enters
`the CNS, one might consider whether these can interact
`with CNS constituents in a promiscuous non-antigen-
`dependent manner to produce cytokines. In support, it
`was noted that in a facial nerve resection model in mouse,
`T cells infiltrated into the CNS and aggregated around
`microglia, and this was correspondent with an increase in
`IL-1b and TNF-a.41 In graft-versus-host disease, activated
`microglia cell clusters are invariably associated with infil-
`trating T cell blasts.42 Futhermore, microglia isolated from
`the brains of healthy adult mice stimulated the differentia-
`tion of naõÈve T cells into Th1 effector cells without affecting
`T-cell proliferation. 43
`The current model that polyclonally activated human T
`cells can interact with human microglia to upregulate a
`variety of inflammatory cytokines further sheds a new
`perspective on immune propagation within the CNS. Cyto-
`kine production in this T cell ± microglia interaction occurs
`in the absence of any identifiable antigen, whether or not
`the microglia and T cells are MHC matched or mis-
`matched.24 TNF-a is produced predominantly by microglia,
`whereas IL-10 is produced by both cell types in the co-
`culture.25 Ligand pairs that modulate IL-10 and TNF-a
`production in T cell ± microglia interaction were found to
`include B7/CTLA-4:CD28, VLA-4:VCAM-1, CD40:CD40L
`and CD23:CD21/CD11.25
`Thus, when activated T cells enter the CNS, they have
`the capacity to engage microglia to produce a variety of
`cytokines to promote CNS inflammation. In this manu-
`script, we have expanded the disease relevance of the T
`cell ± microglia interaction by demonstrating that T cells
`pretreated with glatiramer acetate have a decreased capacity
`to evoke cytokine production in T cell ± microglia co-culture.
`Indeed, all cytokines tested were reduced in a dose-depend-
`ent manner by glatiramer acetate.
`At present,
`the mechanisms by which glatiramer
`acetate affect cytokine production in T cell ± microglia
`interactions are unknown. Some clues may be found in
`
`Figure 6 Glatiramer acetate on cytokine production in co cultures
`of T lymphocytes with PMA/IFNg treated U937 cells. In co culture of
`PMA/IFNg treated U937 cells with T lymphocytes,
`the levels
`of cytokines induced after 24 h were as follows: 969 pg/ml for
`TNF a, 13 pg/ml for IL 4, 667 pg/ml for IL 10, 20 pg/ml for IL 12, and
`51 pg/ml for IL 13. Values are mean‹SEM of triplicate cultures,
`and all results have been expressed as a percentage of control T cell
`microglia cultures (i.e., without glatiramer acetate)
`
`Glatiramer acetate in other models of T cell ±microglia/
`macrophage interactions
`As with their adult counterparts, fetal human microglia in
`isolation do not secrete detectable amounts of IL-10 or TNF-
`a into the culture medium. When fetal human microglia
`were co-cultured with activated T cells, however, significant
`amounts of IL-10 and TNF-a were induced. With glatiramer
`acetate pretreatment of T cells, the resultant IL-10 and TNF-
`a produced in T cell ± microglia co-cultures was reduced in
`a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5).
`U937 is a human pro-monocytoid cell line that assumes a
`bipolar microglia/macrophage-like morphology when
`sequentially treated with PMA and IFNg . Indeed the PMA/
`IFNg -treated U937 assumes several characteristics of micro-
`glia particularly with respect to cytokine production.31 In
`this manuscript, we demonstrate that the PMA/IFNg -treated
`U937 cells have low to negligible amounts of IL-10, IL-12
`and TNF-a, but that their co-culture with anti-CD3 activated
`T cells resulted in the substantial increase in levels of these
`cytokines. Similarly, two Th2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, were
`also induced in co-cultures of T cells with PMA/IFNg -treated
`U937 cells. Significantly, the pretreatment of T cells with
`glatiramer acetate prior to their encounter with PMA/IFNg -
`treated U937 cells reduced, in a concentration-dependent
`manner, the levels of all these cytokines (Figure 6).
`
`Discussion
`
`The treatment of patients with MS has improved signifi-
`cantly in the past few years, with drugs such as glatiramer
`acetate and IFNb having a favourable impact on the clinical
`course of the disease. Despite this, the mechanisms of how
`these drugs work in MS are not fully elucidated.29,37 Under-
`standing the modes of action of current MS drugs and
`uncovering their critical targets will lead to a more rational
`approach to design better therapeutics.
`A spate of recent papers15,16,20,22,23,38 has provided sup-
`port to an older literature6,10,11,13,17,18 on the proposed
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`304
`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`Figure 7 Proposed mechanisms of glatiramer acetate (CopaxoneR) within the CNS. We suggest two mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate
`within the CNS. The first model of bystander suppression has been suggested by the results of several groups (see text) whereby copaxone
`specific Th2 cells, with degenerate T cell receptor (TCR), are generated in the periphery following interference with antigen presentation. These
`cells migrate into the CNS and are reactivated upon encounter with antigens, including cross reactive myelin basic protein (MBP) peptides,
`presented by antigen presenting cells such as microglia. The resultant production of Th2 anti inflammatory cytokines then negatively regulates
`the expansion of autoreactive Th1 cells through bystander suppression. The result of this model is increased Th2 cytokines within the CNS, and
`decreased Th1 cytokines. The second model of copaxone activity stems from the results of this manuscript, where copaxone modulates the
`properties of Th1 and Th2 cells. When these traffic into the CNS, they are less able to engage microglia to produce cytokines. The result is
`the decrease of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines within the CNS. Both models likely coexist to produce the net result of decreasing inflammation
`within the CNS
`
`the observations that T cells, rather than microglia, have
`to be pretreated with glatiramer acetate, and that a period
`of at least 24 h of pretreatment is necessary. While this
`indicates that some properties of the T cells are being
`altered by glatiramer acetate, the ligand pairs cited earlier
`to modulate cytokine production25 were not altered by
`glatiramer acetate treatment, at
`least as assessed on
`expression levels by flow cytometry (unpublished ob-
`servations). Also,
`the lack of cytokine production did
`
`not appear to be an effect of glatiramer acetate on the
`adhesion of T cells (Figure 4). Others have noted that
`glatiramer acetate did not affect the adhesiveness of brain
`endothelial cells in vitro.44 Because the mechanism of the
`glatiramer acetate effect herein is still unknown, our
`preference is to refer to glatiramer-acetate-treated T lym-
`phocytes as `modulated’ T cells (Figure 7). Since both Th1
`(IL-1b, IL-12, TNF-a) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13)
`cytokines are downregulated, a presumption is that both
`
`Multiple Sclerosis
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at Infotrieve on November 3, 2015
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2048
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00643
`
`

`
`Mechanisms of glatiramer acetate
`S Chabot et al
`
`305
`
`the Th1 and Th2 cells are modulated by glatiramer acetate
`to have a reduced capacity to interact with microglia.
`It should be noted that there has been very spare
`information on the pharmacokinetic properties of glatir-
`amer acetate. Because radiolabelled glatiramer acetate is
`rapidly degraded into smaller molecular weight fragments
`following subcutaneous injections in animals, the serum
`concentration of this drug is presumed to be low or non-
`detectable following clinical doses in man.45 Thus, one
`should consider whether the exposure of T cells with
`glatiramer acetate in this study is physiologically relevant.
`We propose that it is, since T cells in proximity to the
`subcutaneous injection sites, including those that are at
`draining lymph nodes, would be exposed to a reasonable
`concentration of glatiramer acetate. Also, the concentrations
`of glatiramer acetate in this study are similar to those
`employed in other laboratories in order to polarize glatir-
`amer-acetate-specific T cells.15,19,21 ± 23
`The modulation of T cell ± microglia engagement may be
`an important target for MS drugs. We have noted that IFNb-
`pretreated T cells are also altered in their ability to engage
`microglia to produce cytokines. Differences do exist, how-
`ever, since, unlike the diminution of all cytokines noted in
`this study, the interaction of IFNb-treated T cells with
`microglia led to the upregulation of IL-10 while diminishing
`IL-1b, IL-4, IL-12 and IL-13. In contrast, IL-6 remained
`unchanged.26
`In summary, our findings have revealed a novel mecha-
`nism of glatiramer acetate in the CNS. We suggest that when
`T cells infiltrate the CNS of MS patients on glatiramer
`acetate therapy, the `modulated’ T cells are unable to engage
`microglia to promote inflammation within the CNS; a con-
`sequence is the reduction of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines in
`the CNS (Figure 7). This mechanism does not exclude the
`more established model of the generation of copaxone-
`reactive Th2 lines, which traffic into the CNS to produce
`bystander suppression of autoreactive Th1 cells (Figure 7).
`With both mechanisms ongoing, the net result of glatiramer
`acetate treatment would be the dampening of inflammation
`within the CNS.
`
`Acknowledgements
`This project was supported by a research grant provided
`by TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries, Israel. We are grate-
`ful
`for the strong support of Dr Nora Tarcic, Project
`Manager, Autoimmune Section, TEVA Pharmaceutical
`Industries, Israel. We thank all the nursing staff in the
`operating theatre who coordinated the transfer of excised
`adult human brain samples to the Yong laboratory.
`
`References
`
`1 Bornstein MB, Miller A, Slagle S, et al. A pilot trial of Cop 1 in
`exacerbating remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1987;
`317: 408 14.
`2 Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces
`relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing remitting mul
`tiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter double blind
`placebo controlled trial. The Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis
`Study Group. Neurology 1995; 45: 1268 76.
`
`3 Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Ford CC, et al. Sustained clinical bene
`fits of glatiramer acetate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients
`observed for 6 years. Mult Scler 2000; 6: 255 66.
`4 Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, Johnson KP and the Copolymer 1
`Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and the MRI Analysis Center.
`United States open label glatiramer acetate extension trial for
`relapsing multiple sclerosis: MRI and clinical correlates. Mult
`Scler 2001; 7: 33 41.
`5 Ben Nun A, Mendel I, Bakimer R, et al. The autoimmune reac
`tivity to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) in multiple
`sclerosis is potentially pathogenic: effect of copolymer 1 on
`MOG induced disease. J Neurol 1996; 243: S14 22.
`6 Teitelbaum D, Fridkis Hareli M, Arnon R, Sela M. Copolymer 1
`inhibits chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomye
`litis induced by proteolipid protein (PLP) peptides in mice and
`interferes with PLP specific T cell responses. J Neuroimmunol
`1996; 64: 209 17.
`7 Teitelbaum D, Arnon R, Sela M. Immunomod ulation of
`experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by oral admin
`istration of copolymer 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:
`3842 47.
`8 Neuhaus O, Farina C, Yassouridis A, et al. Multiple sclerosis:
`comparison of copolymer 1 reactive T cell lines from treated
`and untreated subjects reveals cytokine shift from T helper
`1 to T helper 2 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:
`7452 57.
`9 Sela M, Teitelbaum D. Glatiramer acetate in the treatment

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket