throbber
influence of the vestibular inputs that transmit phasic/
`signals to the ceiebellum while decreasing the influence of the
`inputs that transmit purely tonic signalsls.
`The recurrent positive feedback pathway in our neural
`network was critical for converting a subtle change in the time-
`course of neuronal responses into a change in the steady-state
`output ofthe system. Feedback connections are a general archi-
`tectural feature of the brain and are found at many different
`levels, including the inputs and outputs of the cerebellum and
`the connections between areas of the cerebral cortex. The
`importance of recurrent connections in the pathways that medi-
`ate the VORe allows us to model how recurrent connections
`could contribute to learning and niemory. The model raises the
`possibility that subtle changes in the function of individual
`cellular mechanisms may have profound eff.ects on the output
`lrom speciûc behavioural systems and emphasizes the import-
`ance of understanding the architecture of the neural networks
`that convert cellular changes into changes in behavioural
`output.
`tr
`
`Recelved 5 Maln æpted 18 SeÞtember 1992.
`1. Chufchland, P. S. & Sejnowsk¡, T. J. fhe Computat¡onl B{a¡n (Mll Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).
`2. Storm, J. F. ¡Va¿uÆ 3:F, 379-3a1 (1988).
`3. Bradley, K. & Somjen, G. G. J Phys¡o|., Lotú. LA6,75-92 (1961).
`4. Strong, J. A, & Kaczmtrek, L. N. iñ l,leurcmdtlation: 'nE Biæhenacal CØtrol of Newonal
`Ercitùil¡ty leds Kaczmarek, L. K. & Levitân, l- B.) (Oxford th¡versity Press, 1987).
`5. Lisbergq, S. G. Scìerc 212, 728-735 (198{l).
`6. Miles, F. 4., Bra¡tman, D, J. & Dow, B. M. J. Nwophysiol.441477-1493
`Sâìence 242 771-773 (1988).
`7. Lisb€rger, S. G. & Pæelko, T.
`8. Mil€s, F. 4., Fuller. J. H., Braitman, D. J. & DN, B. M. J. Niltophysiol. ß, L437-1476 (79æ1.
`^.
`9. L¡sberger, S. G., i¡lorris, E. J. & Tychsen, L- A- Rev. l¿euñLLq 97-129 {1987).
`10. Fud1s, A. F. & Kimm, J. L lleurophysiol.4 1140-1161 (1975).
`11. Gonshor. A. & Melvill ¡æs, c. I Phys¡d-. Lond.256, 381-414 (1976).
`12. M¡les, F. A. & Lisberget S. G. A. Rev. NwrosL4,273-299 (1981).
`13. lto, M. 8ráin Âes $, A!-U $972],.
`14. Watanôe, E. Btaln Res. 29¡l, 1,69-L7 4 (tú4I
`15. L¡sberger, S. G, & Sejnowski,'1. J. U,liv, Cd¡lon¡ê Sân Diego lnst. Ileúal Comput. fech. Rep.
`920L(7992).
`16. L¡sberger, S. G. & Pavelko, T, A. J NMoæl 6,346-354 (1986).
`
`(1980).
`
`AC]fiOW"E0GEI\,iÉNTS. We thilk numerous ælleagues for their helpful comments. Research was
`supported by a grãnt from the D€fenæ Advâæd Reæarch Proiæt Agercy, awarded through the
`Offìce of Naval Research.
`
`A single am¡no-acid difference
`confers ma¡or pharmacological
`variation between human and
`rodent 5-HTr" receptors
`Donna Oksenberg*f, Scot A. tlarsters*,
`Brian F. O'Dowdf, Hui lint, Sona Havlikf,
`Stephen l. Peroutkat$ & Avi Ashkenazi*
`Departments of * Pulmonary Research and Gene Therapy, and
`$ Neuroscience, Genentech lnc., 460 Point San Bruno Boulevard,
`South San Francisco, California 94080, USA
`t Department of Neurolory, Stanford University School of Medicine,
`Stanford, California 94305, I,JSA
`i Department of Pharmacology, Uñiversity of Toronto, Toronto,
`Ontario MsS 148, Canada
`
`NnunopsvcglATRrc disorders such as anxiet¡r, depressionr.
`migrrine, v¡sospasm and epilepsy may involve different subtypes
`of the Shydroxytryptamine (5-HÐ receptorl'2. The lB subtype,
`whieh has a unique pharmacology, w¡s first identified iu rodent
`br¡in}7. But a similar receptor could not be detected in humrn
`brain6, suggesting the abseuce in man of a receptor with equivalent
`function. Recently a human receptor gene nas isolated (dæigneted
`s-lfTrB receptoPe, 5-HT1DÉ receptorrqlr, or S12 receptorr2)
`'which sh¡res 93% identity of the deduced protein sequence with
`rodent S-HT¡¡ receptorsr!¡!. Although this receptor is identical
`NATURE ' VOL 360 . 12 NOVEMBER 1992
`
`TETTERS TO NATURE
`
`TABLE 1 Ligand-binding properties of the wild-type and T355N mutant human recep-
`tors compared with those of the rat and mouse s-HTß leceptors
`
`/(, (nM)
`
`Human
`(T3s5N)
`
`Ratla
`(5-HI1B)
`
`Mousels
`(5-HT1B)
`
`8+1
`3+1
`2*l
`' 2+l
`200+40
`560+100
`97Oi 130
`25,000 i 1,000
`i8r8
`L7 *L
`20+3
`13+1
`
`16+ 1
`7 +1,
`4*2
`2*I
`129 * 33
`465 + 85
`!823t?97
`>10,000
`13t4
`
`57 14
`153 r 62
`NA
`
`39
`10
`NA
`10
`NA
`NA
`NA
`30,000
`NA
`
`NA
`69
`NA
`
`Human
`(wild type)
`
`10+1
`4+L
`6+1
`44!4
`25+3
`38i3
`130r7
`1,600+100
`L2r1,
`
`8,100+40o
`11,000 * 1,000
`11,000+800
`
`Ligand
`
`Serotonergic
`5-HT
`5-CT
`Dl.C
`RU24969
`Metergoline
`Sumatriptan
`Methyserɡde
`8.OH.DPAT
`Methlothepin
`B-adrenêrg¡c
`(-)Propranolol
`(-)P¡ndolol
`(-)Alprenolol
`
`The values are dep¡cted as mean *s.e.m, from 4 (wild type) and 3 (T355N) indepen-
`dent experiments done in triplicâtes. NA, data not available. Complementary DNAS
`encoding the wildlype and T355l.l mutant human receptors were inserted into the
`mammalian express¡on vector pRKs and introduced by trans¡ent transfection into the
`human embryonic kidney 293 cell line by a modified calcium phosphate precipitation
`method3, The cells were collected by c€ntrifugation 48h after transfection, lysed in
`ice-cold buffer (5OmM Tr¡s-l-lcl, pH 7.4, contain¡ng 5mM EDIA), homogenized, and
`sonicated for 10s. Nuclei ãnd intact cells were removed by centrifugêtion ât 1,0009
`for 10 m¡ñ. The supernatant was spun at 35,0009 for 30 min and the resulting pellet,
`containing the m¡crosomal membrane fraction, wâs resuspended ¡n bind¡ng buffer
`contain¡ng 50 mM Tris-rc| (pH 7.4), 4 m¡¿ cacl2, 0.1% âscrobic acid, l0 mM pargyline
`and 1 ¡rM leupept¡ne. Microsomal membranes (5O p! protein) were incuÞated with the
`ligands in bind¡ng buffer (30m¡n,25qC). Binding was terminated by the add¡tion of
`5 ml ice-cold 50 mM Tris-l-lCl (pH 7.8), rapid vacuum fiftration through glass fibre f¡lters,
`and two subsequent s-ml washes. Spec¡fic bind¡ng wâs def¡ned as the excess over
`blanks taken in the presence of 1O-sM cold s-HT. Scatchard analyses of saturation
`binding of [3H]s-Hf showed two populat¡ons of binding sites; equilibrium d¡ssociation
`constants (KJ for the wíld-type and mutant receptor, respectively, were 4.611.4 and
`3.9 + 1.2 nM (high-âffinity sites);72 + 24and75+L4rì¡(low-affin¡ty sites). The respec-
`t¡ve receptor densit¡es ¡n pmol per gram of protein were 1,000+ 32O and L,440*6LO
`(high-aff¡nity s¡tes), 13,670+1,860 and 25330i4,¿180 (low-aff¡n¡ty sites). Specific
`b¡nd¡ng of f3HlsJ-ff was not detectable in untransfected cells (not shown), ind¡cating
`that these cells do not express significant levels of endogenous s-HT receptors.
`Equilibrium ¡nhibition constanls (K¡)were determined according to thefollowingequat¡on:
`Kt=lcla/í +lT)/ Ko), where lcs is the c$ncentrat¡on of compet¡ng liÉand required for
`5096 inhib¡tion of [3H]5-HT Þ¡nding, [Tl is the concentration of the f3Hls-l{T tracer
`(3nM), and KD is the high-aff¡nity constant of [3H]5-Hf, as determined by saturation
`binding. The deta were analysed by nonlinear least-square fitt¡ng using the EBDA2a
`and LIGAND25 programs.
`
`to rodent 5-HT1s receptors in binding to S-HT, it differs profoundly
`in binding to many drugs. Here we show that replacement of a
`single amino acid in the human receptor (threonine at residue 355)
`with a corresponding asparagine found in rodent S-HT'B receptors
`renders the pharmacology of the receptors essentially identical.
`This demonstrates that the human gene does indeed encode a 1B
`receptor, which is likely to h¡ve the same biological functions as
`the rodent S-HTIB receptor. In addition, these findings show that
`minute sequence differences between homologues of the same
`receptor from different species c¡n cause large pharmacological
`vari¡tion. Thuq drug-receptor interactions should not be extrapo-
`lated from animal.to human species without verific¡tion.
`The human and rodent 5-HTrB receptors bind to 5-HT with
`comparably high affinity. But the human receptor binds with
`much lower affinity to the serotonergic agonist RU 24969 and
`to the B-adrenergic receptor antagonists propranolol, pindolol
`and alprenolol, and with higher affinity to several serotonergic
`drugs, including sumatriptan and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl-
`amino)retralin (8-OH-DPAT¡6-I4 lTable 1).
`Tl¡e 32 amino-acid differences between the human and rat
`receptors are scattered throughout the molecule, but only eight
`are found in the transmembrane domains, which are thought to
`contain the ligand-binding pocket (Fig. l). An asparagine
`residue in the seventh transmembrane segment has been impli-
`cated in B-antagonist binding to the B-adrenergic receptorró
`and to human 5-HTrA receptorsrT. Notably, an asparagine
`161
`
`@ f992 NaturêPublishing Group
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2033
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`
`NHr
`
`A
`
`A
`
`LETÎERS TO NATURE
`
`FlG. 1 Seven-transmembrane-segment model of the
`human s-HTß receptor. The amlno acids found in
`the humân rec€ptoÊ12 are circled; residues that
`are d¡fferent or absent in the rat 5-HT1¡ feceÞtorl3aa
`are shown next to the corresponding positions. The
`rat sequence is 98% identical to the mouselu s-Hfr"
`receptor sequence. Tlp dark box ind¡cates position
`355, in which the threon¡ne of the human receptor
`was replaced with the corresponding asparagine
`found in the rat ênd the mouse 5-HTts receptors.
`METHIDS. Threonine codon 355 of the human recep-
`tor cDNAB was replaced w¡th an asparagine codon
`by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. A 39-base
`synthetic ol¡gonucleotide canying the asparâgíne
`codon (contain¡ng two mismatches with the
`threoninc COdON) (GTTGAGATAGCCCAGCCAGTTGAA.
`GAAGTCAAAGATGGC) was used as the mutagenesis
`nrimar
`Thic nrimar wac hvhti.l¡"ê.i
`tô â <iñdlê-
`stranded DNA containing the wild-type sequence
`and extended by T4 DNA polymerase, and the
`double-strânded DNA plasmid was introduced into
`Escherichia coli. Bacterial colonies containing the
`T355N mutation were ident¡fied by two consecutive
`hybridizat¡on analyses and a single clone carrying
`the mutation was selected and confirmed by DNA
`sequefìcinE.
`
`a 120
`
`o---
`-l
`o.-....--.-....'..-o
`
`OWT
`O T355N
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`0
`11
`
`'t0
`
`9
`
`7
`

`
`5
`
`sF
`
`.I
`ro
`
`I oo
`
`)
`.GT'c
`-o
`
`oEooo
`
`.

`
`TOG
`
`L
`
`YD
`
`H
`
`Extracellular
`
`lntracellular
`

`
`E
`
`) P¡ndolol
`) Propranolol
`) Alprenolol
`
`WT
`
`ovo
`
`T355N
`(-) Pindolol
`(-) Propranotol
`(-) Alprenolof
`
`avI
`
`-loo tliqandl lMl
`
`2
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`i
`
`10
`
`b ñl
`
`-
`
`foIo
`
`oo
`
`.çõc
`
`o.
`
`o=ooo
`
`.
`U)
`
`o10
`
`11
`
`a4
`
`o3a
`
`2
`
`a5
`O6
`
`a7
`
`r- ô 1q
`
`5
`7
`B
`Human wild-type recèplor pKl
`
`9
`
`4O
`
`a'
`
`10
`
`alr
`
`/ = 0.86
`
`7
`
`Human T355N receptor p(
`NATURE . VOL 360 . 12 NOVEMBER 1S92
`
`B
`
`6
`
`4
`
`ds
`
`q.
`
`oõ
`
`.o
`
`o @
`
`F+ 6
`
`tc
`
`e9
`
`\l
`a.
`ooo
`
`o Érnd
`
`CC
`
`I
`-lon f6-HTì lMì
`
`WT
`
`O Metergol¡ne
`v Sumamplan
`o Methysergíde
`
`T355N
`
`Metergol¡ne
`Sumatriptan
`Methysergide
`
`ovI
`
`E
`
`I
`
`V o
`
`o
`
`c 120
`F roo
`FI
`ÈBo
`:E
`
`Ç:rD_0
`
`Y
`
`v
`
`360c
`
`EC ç'
`
`õ&
`
`zoø
`
`0
`
`10
`
`86
`-log [Ligandl (M)
`FlG. 2 comparison of the ligand-b¡nding properties of the wild type (WI
`open symbols) and T355N mutant (f¡lled symbols) human receptors
`expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. 4 Competit¡on of 5-Ht
`(O,O) for [3H]5-Hr bind¡ng. b, Compet¡tion of the B-adrenergic receptor
`antagonists (-)pindolol (O,O), (-)propranolol (V,V) and (-)alprenolol
`(D,l) for [3H]5-HT binding. c, competit¡on of the serotonergic ligands
`metergoline (O, O), sumatriptan (V, V) and methysergide (tr,1) for [3H]5-
`HT-binding. d Correlation between pK, values for the human wild-type
`receptor and the rat 5-HT"" receptor. (e) Correlation between pK, values
`for the human T3551{ mutant receptor versus the rat 5-HT1B leceptor. Ligand
`numbers and pKrs are based on the¡t order of appearance in Table 1.
`t62
`
`-\
`
`4
`
`@ 1992 Nature Publishing Group
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2033
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644
`
`

`
`is found at this location in all cloned 5-HT receptors
`r€sidue
`that bind p-antagonists; ratr3'ta and mousels S'HTrB receptors,
`ratrE and humant'''o 5-HT1A receptors' and in B-adrenergic
`receptors2r. In contrast,. a threonine residue- is found at this
`poriiion (355) in the human s-HTrB receptors-r2. To assess the
`contribution of this threonine to the distinct pharmacology of
`the human receptor, we replaced it with the corresponding
`asparagine founã in rodent S-HT,B re€eptors by site-directed
`mutagenesis (Fig. l). Scatchard analysis showed that the wild-
`type ãnd rnot"nút¡ssN) receptors bind f HI5-HT with similar
`afùnity, each with two binding-site populations (Ko:4.6 ¿nd
`72r,M,'wild type; 3.9 and ?5 nM, mutant; data not shown)'
`Competition analysìs also showed similar 5-HT affinities for the
`wild-iype and mutant receptors (Fig. 2a; Table 1). Thus, the
`ß55Ñìubstitution does not afiect binding to the natural ligand
`5-HT.
`To compare the pharmacology of the wild-type and mutant
`human receptors wiih that of rodent 5-HT¡s receptors, we caruied
`out competilion assays with serotonergic and B -adrenergic drugs
`from various chemicàl classes' Like 5'HT, 5-carboxyamidotrypt-
`amine (5-CT) and dihydroergotamine (DHE)' which have
`similar inhibition constants (Kr) with the wild-type human and
`the rodent receptors, showed comparable K¡s for T355N (Table
`l). ln contrasi, tlne B-attagonists propranolol pindolol and
`aiprenolol had markedly reduced K¡s with T355N, which were
`comparable to the Kis seen with the rodent receptors (Fig' 2b;
`Table l). The K¡. of the serotonergic ligand RU 24969 was
`-2O-fold lower with T355N than with the wild type, and similar
`to the K¡s for the rodent receptors (Table 1)' Metergoline,
`sumatriptan, methysergide and 8-OH-DPAT bound to T355N
`with ¡í.s that were 7-15 times higher than those seen with the
`witd type, and more similar to K¡s observed for the rodent
`receptôis (Fig.2c; Table l). Methiothepin, which has similar
`K,s with th" *ild-typ" human and the rodent receptors, showed
`a iourfold higher K¡ with T355N (Table 1)- The Kls of 11 ligands
`showed no cõrrelati,on between the human wild type and T355N
`(r:0.03), or the human wild-type and rat receptors (r:0'18)'
`but showed a significant correlation between T355N and the rat
`receptor (r:0.86; P<0.0025) (Fie.2d, e)-
`Thus, substitution of threonine 355 o[ the human receptor
`with the corresponding asparagine of rodent 5-HTrB receptors
`confers the pharmacology of a I B subtype on the human recep-
`tor. Taken together with the high sequence homology between
`these receptors, this demonstrates that the 5-HT receptor gene
`investigated here does indeed encode the human species variant
`of the lB 5-HT receptor subtype. Therefore, given that the
`human and rodent 5-HT'B receptors bind the natural ligand,
`5-HT, with the same affinity, it is likely that despite their dramati-
`cally different pharmacology, these receptors are equivalent in
`function.
`The identification of a human S-HTrB receptor is of biological
`and clinical significance. Whereas this receptor and the human
`5-HTrD receptor2z share only ó87o amino-acid sequence identity
`an¿ aré encoded on different chromosomes, their pharmacologi-
`cal properties are virtually indistinguishableE-'2. Therefore, bio-
`Iogical functions such as appetite control, migraine reduction
`and regulation of 5-HT release, attributed previously to the
`S-HT,5 receptor on the basis ol drugs presumed to be selective
`for this subtype, indeed rnay be mediated by either the 5-HTtp
`or the 5-HT1¡ receptor, or by both. Understanding the individual
`functions of these receptors thus may help improve the clinical
`application of compounds such as the antimigraine drug
`sumatriptan, which binds to both the 5-HTr¡ and 5-HT¡s
`receptors.
`Finally, our results show that a single arnino-acid difterence
`can cuuJe dramatic pharmacological variation between species
`homologues ol the same receptor. Thus, ligand-binding proper-
`ties of ã given receptor cannot be extrapolated across species
`without independent validation, even in the context ofvery high
`interspecies iequence identity. This has important implications
`NATURE' VOL 360 . 12 NOVEMBERlgg2
`
`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`for the design and therapeutic use of receptor-selective drugs
`when these are based on measurements ofselectivity and efrEcacy
`n
`in non-human species.
`
`Ræived 19 June; accept€d 28 September 1992-
`1, Hartig. P. R. et al. lþutopsycl",opharmmlogv 3,335-347 (1990).
`2. Perottkâ, s, J. Neurophilmædogy 31, 609-613 (1992)
`3. Pedigo, N. W., Yamamura, H. l & Nelsn' D L ). \deuroc'lgm' æ' 220-226 îæLI
`¿. sctr¡ietiman, R. e., Waters, S. J & Nelson, A.L. J. Neuræhem' 42' 65-70 (1984)'
`5. l-loyer,0., EnÉel, G. & Kâlkman, H. o. Eut' J Philmæ. alq 1 12 {1985)
`ã. Xo!"r, o., en!"r, c. & Kalkman, H. O. Eut. J. Phârnæ 118, 13-23 (1985)'
`Z. fOyer. O- A uticotemis, D. N. frends phamæ. 31¡ 10' 130-132 (1989)'
`8. J¡n, H. el aL l b¡ot. CÌEñ.2€7,5735-5738
`(1992).
`9. Hambi¡n, M. W., Met€lf, M. 4., t¡ccuffin, R. w. & Karpells S Bioehem' b¡qhys Res Cofrmun
`L84,752_759 (1992\.
`10. Weinshar{í R. L et at. Ptæ. natn Aeàd Scr: Us.A 89,3630-3634 (1992)
`11. Demchystryn, L. et at. Ptæ. natn. Acad Sai t-ts¡ 89, 5522-5526 17992)
`12. Olav-Levy, F. et al. ! b¡ot. clÊn.?67,7553-7562
`(1992)
`13. Voigt, M. M., Lilr¡e, D. J., Seeburg, P H. & Bach, A. EMEO J.1O,4017-4023 (1991)'
`14. Adham, N. et d. Molæ Philmæ. 41,1-7 (1992)
`15. Maroteaux, L. et al. Ptæ. natn. Acad, Sc,: USA &t,3020-3024 (1992)
`16.Suryanarayana,A-.Dalnt,D.A,VonzåstroqM.&Nobilka,BK J'Ad'CheñM'7548a-15492
`(1991).
`12. òuan, x. G., Peroutka. S. .1. & Kobilka' a.K. Molæ- Pr¡åmæ.4t" 695-69a (1992)'
`18. Albert, P. R. et a'. J. bio!. chem.85,5825-5832 (1990).
`19. Kobilka, B. K. et aì. I'taturc 3fEt,75-79 (1987)
`20. Fargin, A. et at. J. bid. clem. N,4848-4852 (1989).
`21. Findlay, I & Eliopoulos, E. Ttnds phatmac Sci L7,492 499 (1990)
`22. Hamrriin, ¡r. w. & lvletcalf . M. A. Motec' mamæ. Æ. 143 148 (1991).
`23. Ashkenazi,4.,Peralta,E.G,,W¡nslow.J.W. Ramæhandfan,J.&Câpon D J Ceilt6'ß7-493'
`24. McPherson, G. A. Comp. ProE Siomed L7, IO7-ll4 \7983).
`25. Munson, P. J. & Rocbard D. Analy¿ Biochem. aO?, 220-239 (1989)'
`
`ACKNoWLEDGE},ENTS.wethankc.clarkandR.waldforcommeôtsonthemanuscfipt.Thiswork
`was suppoíted by the NlH, the Kleirer Family Foundation and Geneñtech, lnc'
`
`Positive feedback of glutamate
`exocytosis bY metabotropic
`presynaptic receptor stimulation
`lnmaculada Herrero, M. Teresa Miras'Portugal
`& losé Sánchez-Prieto*
`
`Departamento de Bioquimica, Facultad de Veterinaria,
`Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid' Spain
`
`GLUTAMATE is important in several forms of synaptic plasticity
`such as long-term potentiation, ¡nd in neuronal ccll degener-
`ationr?. Gluiamate activates several types of receptors, including
`a metabotropic receptor that is sensitive to fiøns'l'^mino-cyclo-
`penthyl-1,3-dicarboxylate, couple$ to G protein(s) and linked to
`inositäl phospholipid metabolismH. The activation of the meta-
`botropicìeceptor in neurons generates inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate'
`which causeJ the release of Ca2t from intracellular stores and
`rtiacylglycerol, which âctivates protein kinase C7-e' In nerve ter-
`m¡nals, ihe activation of presynaptic protein kinase C with phorbol
`esters enhances glutamaie releasero. But the presynaptic receptor
`involved in this protein kinase C-mediated increase in the release
`of glutamate has not yet been identifierl. Here we demonstrate the
`pruiunce of a presynaptic glutamate receptor of the metabotropic
`þpe that medi¡tes an enhancement of glutamate exocytosis in
`cerebrocortical nerve terminals, Interestingly, this potentiation of
`glutamate release is observed only in the presetrce of erachidonic
`ãcid, which may reflect that this positive feedback control of
`glutamrte exocytos¡s operates in concert with other pre- or post-
`Jynaptic events of the glutamatergic neurotransmission that gener-
`ate arachidonic acid. This presynaptic glutamate receptor mây
`have a physiological role in fhe maintenance of long-term potenti-
`ation where there is an increase in glutamate rele¡se mediated by
`postsynaptically generated arachidonic acidll.
`' fnä aã¿itlott ãf tne selective agonist for the metabotropic
`receptor, (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid
`
`* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`163
`
`@ 1992 Nature Publishing GrouP
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2033
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2015-00644

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket