throbber
Toxicologic Pathology, 40: 40-54, 2012
`Copyright # 2012 by The Author(s)
`ISSN: 0192-6233 print / 1533-1601 online
`DOI: 10.1177/0192623311424169
`
`Comparative Long-Term Preclinical Safety Evaluation of
`Two Glatiramoid Compounds (Glatiramer Acetate,
`1
`, and TV-5010, Protiramer) in Rats and Monkeys
`Copaxone
`
`YUVAL RAMOT
`
`1, MOTI ROSENSTOCK
`
`2, ETY KLINGER
`
`2, DIZZA BURSZTYN
`
`2, ABRAHAM NYSKA
`
`3, AND DORON M. SHINAR
`
`2
`
`1Hadassah—Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
`2Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel
`3Consultant in Toxicological Pathology, Timrat, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`1
`Glatiramer acetate (GA), the active ingredient in Copaxone
`, is a complex mixture of polypeptides used for the treatment of relapsing
`remitting multiple sclerosis. Glatiramoids are related mixtures that may differ in some characteristics of the prototype molecule. Our aim is to describe
`the long-term toxicity studies with protiramer (TV-5010), a new glatiramoid, in comparison with similar studies conducted with GA. The toxicity of
`twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of protiramer to Sprague-Dawley rats (twenty-six weeks) and cynomolgus monkeys (fifty-two weeks) was com-
`pared with similar studies done with daily subcutaneous injections of GA. Daily treatment with GA was safe and well tolerated, without systemic effects
`or death. Protiramer administration was not as well tolerated as GA and led to dose- and time-related mortalities, probably mediated through severe
`injection-site lesions both in rats and in monkeys. Bridging fibrosis in the liver and severe progressive nephropathy were seen in rats. A dose-related
`increase in eosinophils was observed in monkeys. The protiramer toxicity studies show that minor variations in the manufacturing of glatiramoids
`may lead to significant toxic effects. It is therefore essential that the safety of any new glatiramoid be studied in long-term preclinical studies before
`exposing humans.
`
`Keywords:
`
`glatiramoids; toxicity; injection site; glatiramer acetate; protiramer.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The glatiramoid class of compounds is a family of synthetic
`heterogenous polypeptide mixtures that include four natural
`amino acids, L-glutamic acid, L-alanine, L-lysine, and L-
`tyrosine,
`in a distinct molar ratio of 0.14:0.43:0.09:0.34,
`respectively, with an average molecular weight (MW) in the
`range of 5,000–9,000 Daltons (Varkony et al. 2009). The first
`glatiramoid, and the best studied one, is glatiramer acetate
`1
`, which is approved
`(GA), the active ingredient in Copaxone
`for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
`(MS) in over fifty countries. It has been shown that GA has a
`unique immunomodulatory mechanism, leading to disruption
`of the pathogenic process in MS by reinforcing immunoregula-
`tory networks (Arnon and Aharoni 2009; Blanchette and Neu-
`haus 2008; Liblau 2009; Schrempf and Ziemssen 2007; Van
`Kaer 2011; Weber et al. 2007). The exact mode of action of
`GA has not been completely elucidated, but it has been sug-
`gested that the heterogeneous nature of the mixture plays an
`important role in securing activity in such a heterogeneous dis-
`ease (Johnson 2010; Varkony et al. 2009).
`
`This work was performed at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Petach
`Tikva,
`Israel. Funds for
`this project were provided in part by Teva
`Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel. Some of the authors are
`employees of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel.
`Address correspondence to: Abraham Nyska, DVM, Haharuv 18, P.O. Box
`184, Timrat, Israel 36576; e-mail: anyska@bezeqint.net.
`Abbreviations: CPN, chronic progressive nephropathy; GA, glatiramer
`acetate; MS, multiple sclerosis; MW, molecular weight.
`
`Recently, there has been growing interest in glatiramoids in
`the pharmaceutical industry (Johnson 2010), and many manu-
`facturers are seeking to develop new glatiramoids (Kovalcin,
`Krieger, Collins et al. 2010; Kovalchin, Krieger, Genova et
`al. 2010), and others aim to prepare follow-on (‘‘generic’’)
`versions of GA itself. An additional new glatiramoid product,
`protiramer (also denoted as TV-5010), was recently devel-
`oped by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd (Petach Tikva,
`Israel) as a potential follow-on product to GA with a slightly
`higher MW distribution. The rationale for developing a high-
`MW glatiramoid was based on results of fractionation studies
`of GA that showed that the higher the MW of the fraction,
`the higher potency and immune reactivity the fraction has
`in pharmacological models. This new glatiramoid was devel-
`oped to provide better efficacy or less dosing frequency for
`MS patients.
`Protiramer was made by making minor modifications to the
`GA synthetic process, mainly a slight change in the tempera-
`ture in which the precursor molecule is cleaved to yield the
`final mixture. This minor change results in a product with a dif-
`ferent MW distribution and different biological properties than
`GA (De Stefano et al. 2009; Varkony et al. 2009). Based on
`encouraging preclinical safety results from short-term toxicity
`studies, protiramer’s safety, tolerability, and efficacy were
`evaluated in two small phase II clinical trials in MS patients;
`it demonstrated good general safety and tolerability (De Ste-
`fano et al. 2009). Later, long-term preclinical toxicity studies
`in monkeys and rats revealed marked progression in the
`severity of
`injection site
`reactions, which was
`also
`
`40
`
`
`Page 1 of 15
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2014-00644
`
`

`

`Vol. 40, No. 1, 2012
`
`TOXICITY OF GLATIRAMOIDS COMPOUNDS
`
`41
`
`accompanied by kidney and liver damage, and death of some
`high-dose animals. The findings in animals led to the termina-
`tion of the drug development program of protiramer (Varkony
`et al. 2009) and brought about the understanding that even
`slight changes in the manufacturing process of glatiramoids
`may have profound safety implications.
`The aim of the present report is to describe the clinical and
`anatomical pathology findings in the long-term preclinical
`toxicity studies of protiramer and compare these results with
`the results of similar preclinical chronic toxicity studies in
`rats and monkeys that were carried out previously with
`GA. By comparing these two toxicity studies, we show that
`minor variations in the manufacturing of glatiramoids may
`lead to significant toxic effects. In addition, we present and
`discuss the potential mechanistic association between the
`severe injection site lesions and systemic toxicities seen in
`animals.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Chemicals
`
`Both GA and protiramer were produced by Teva Pharma-
`ceutical Industries, Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel, at a fully accre-
`dited GMP manufacturing site.
`
`Animals and Housing
`
`The toxicology studies were carried out as fully compliant
`GLP studies in accredited contract research laboratories. All
`animals used in this research were treated humanely, with due
`consideration to alleviation of distress and discomfort. For the
`protiramer studies, male and female Sprague-Dawley rats
`(approximately eight weeks old) were obtained from Charles
`River Laboratories (Saint Germain sur l’Arbresle, France), and
`male and female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis,
`twenty-six to thirty-nine months old) were obtained from
`Siconbrec, Simian Conservation Breeding and Research Cen-
`ter, Inc. (Tanay Rizal, Philippines). For the GA studies, male
`and female Sprague-Dawley rats (approximately four weeks
`old) were obtained from Charles River (Margate, UK), and
`male and female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis,
`approximately twenty-four months old) were obtained from
`Mediprime (Billinghurst, West Sussex, UK). For the rat stud-
`ies, water and feed were available ad libitum (diet reference
`A04C-10 for the protiramer study, and SQC rat and mouse
`maintenance diet No. 1 from Special Diet Services Ltd,
`Witham, UK for the GA study). For the GA monkey study,
`animals were offered daily SQC Mazuri Primate Diet (Special
`Diet Services Ltd, Witham, UK) supplemented by fruit and a
`Bonio biscuit (Spillers Foods Ltd, New Malden, UK), and for
`the protiramer study, animals were offered daily expanded
`complete commercial primate diet (Special Diet Services:
`OWM (E) short SQC) supplemented by fruit. The room tem-
`perature was 18C–25C and the humidity was 40–80%
`throughout all studies. The fluorescent light cycle was twelve
`hours per day for all studies, and there were at least ten room
`
`air changes per hour for the monkey studies, and at least fifteen
`changes for the rat studies. All animals were randomly assigned
`to the treatment groups. For the rat studies, animals were
`housed in groups of three to five (protiramer) or groups of five
`(GA) in stainless steel mesh cages. For the monkey studies,
`animals were housed in groups of two or three (protiramer)
`or individually (GA).
`
`Experimental Design
`
`The route of administration in all studies was subcutaneous
`injections. Several injection sites were used in each animal and
`were alternated on each session to minimize local damage.
`Doses for the chronic toxicity studies were selected based on
`tolerability observed in shorter range-finding studies (not
`shown). The GA rat chronic toxicity study included one control
`and three treatment groups of twenty animals/sex/group that
`were treated daily at doses of 0, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg for
`twenty-six weeks. Vehicle was sterile physiological saline, and
`a constant dose volume of 2 mL/kg was used. The protiramer
`rat chronic toxicity study included four treatment groups and
`one control group; each group consisted of twenty males and
`twenty females per dose treated twice a week at doses of 0,
`2.5, 40, and 300 mg/kg or once every two weeks at 2.5 mg/
`kg dose (low-dose, low frequency) for twenty-six weeks. Addi-
`tional animals (five/sex/group) of the control and high-dose
`groups were assigned to a four-week treatment-free period. The
`vehicle was mannitol solution in water for injection, and the
`dose volume was 5 mL/kg. The GA monkey study included
`three treatment groups and one control group of four ani-
`mals/sex/group, treated at doses of 0, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg for
`fifty-two weeks. The vehicle was sterile physiological saline,
`and a dose volume of 1.5 mL/kg was used. The protiramer
`monkey study included four treatment groups and one control
`group; each group consisted of seven males and seven females.
`Protiramer treatment of the monkeys was done twice weekly at
`doses of 0, 2, 10, and 60 mg/kg for either thirteen weeks
`(interim group of three animals/sex/dose) or fifty-two weeks
`(main group of four animals/sex/dose). The fifth group was a
`low-dose, low-frequency group and was administered protira-
`mer once every four weeks at a dose level of 2 mg/kg (the same
`number of monkeys for this group). The high dose was lowered
`from 60 to 30 mg/kg on day 280 of the study because of poor
`tolerability. Additional animals of the control, high-dose, and
`low-frequency, low-dose groups (two males and two females
`per group) were assigned to a four-week treatment-free period
`after fifty-two weeks of dosing. The vehicle was mannitol solu-
`tion in water for injection, and the dose volume was 1 mL/kg.
`All animals were observed at least twice daily to detect any
`mortality or morbidity, and once daily for ill health or reaction
`to treatment. Individual body weights were recorded weekly.
`Blood chemistry, coagulation, and hematology parameters
`were examined at the end of each rat study and at predose and
`at several predetermined time points during the monkey stud-
`ies. Urine samples were also collected on several occasions
`in both the rat and monkey studies. At
`the scheduled
`
`
`Page 2 of 15
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2014-00644
`
`

`

`42
`
`RAMOT ET AL.
`
`TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
`
`termination, animals were subjected to a full gross pathology
`evaluation including weighing of selected organs and histo-
`pathological analysis. Moribund animals were also examined
`for any pathological abnormality.
`In the GA studies, the weights of the adrenals, pituitary,
`brain (including brain stem), prostate, heart, spleen, kidneys,
`testes with epididymides, liver, ovaries, and thyroids with para-
`thyroids were determined at terminal sacrifice. In the protira-
`mer studies, the weights of the thymus and uterus were also
`determined. For histological examination, tissues were fixed
`in 10% neutral buffered formalin, except for the eyes, which
`were fixed in Davidson’s fixative, and the bone marrow
`smears, which were fixed in methanol (in the GA studies) or air
`dried (in the protiramer studies). In the protiramer studies, the
`testes and epididymides were also fixed in Davidson’s fixative.
`Fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained
`with hematoxylin and eosin. The following tissues from
`all high-dose and control groups animals were sampled: adre-
`nals, brain (including brain stem), esophagus, eyes, femur,
`Harderian gland, heart and aorta, large intestine (cecum, colon,
`and rectum), small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum),
`injection site, kidney, liver, lung (and main stem bronchi),
`lymph nodes (mandibular and mesenteric), mammary gland,
`nose, optic nerves, ovary, pancreas, parathyroid gland, pituitary
`gland, prostate gland, salivary gland, skin, spinal cord and scia-
`tic nerve, spleen, stomach (including forestomach and glandu-
`lar stomach), testis (with epididymis and seminal vesicle),
`thigh muscle, thymus, thyroid gland, tongue, trachea, urinary
`bladder, uterus, vagina, and Zymbal’s gland. In the GA rat
`study, the following tissues were examined microscopically: all
`tissues from all animals in control and high-dose groups, all tis-
`sues from animals that died or were killed in extremis, injection
`sites, and abnormalities from the low- and intermediate dose
`groups. In the protiramer group, histopathological examina-
`tion was performed for all organs from the following animals:
`for all animals found dead or sacrificed moribund during the
`study, and all the control group animals, all intermediate dose
`group males, and all high-dose group females and all high-
`dose group males sacrificed after twenty weeks of treatment.
`Histopathological examination was also performed for kid-
`neys, liver, and injection sites from all other dose groups as
`well as for the animals that were assigned to the treatment-
`free ‘‘recovery’’ groups. The severity of microscopic lesions
`observed was graded based on the following numerical
`scale: 0 (no lesion), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and
`4 (severe), based on the criteria explained by Shackelford
`et al. (2002).
`
`Statistical Analysis
`
`In all studies, statistical analysis was performed separately
`for males and females.
`For the analysis of the clinical chemistry and hematology
`parameters, the Levene test for homogeneity of variances and
`the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess for normality were performed
`in protiramer studies, and the Levene test was performed in
`
`GA studies. Parametric methods were performed in protiramer
`studies in the case of homogeneous variances and normal dis-
`tribution in all groups and in GA studies in the case of homo-
`geneous variances between groups. Such analysis consisted of
`the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed, if the
`ANOVA test was significant, by the Dunnett test for pairwise
`comparisons. Nonparametric methods were performed in pro-
`tiramer studies in the case of evidence of heterogeneous var-
`iances or a non-normal distribution in at least one group and
`in GA studies in the case that there was a significant group
`effect or a significant sex–group interaction in the Levene
`test. Such analysis consisted of the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA
`followed, if the Kruskal-Wallis test was significant, by the
`Wilcoxon rank sum test
`for pairwise comparisons. The
`Jonckheere-Tersptra trend test was used to test for an increas-
`ing or decreasing trend in response (excluding the low-dose,
`low-frequency group). In the GA studies,
`in the case of
`homogeneous variances between groups, a regression test for
`post-dose variables was used instead. The ANOVA results
`are not reported.
`For histopathology data, nonparametric methods were used.
`Such analysis consisted of the Kruskal-Wallis test followed, if
`the Kruskal-Wallis test was significant, by the Wilcoxon rank
`sum test for pairwise comparisons. The Jonckheere-Tersptra
`trend test was used to test for an increasing or decreasing trend
`in response (excluding the low-dose, low-frequency group).
`The Kruskal-Wallis results are not reported. Statistically signif-
`icant results for pairwise comparisons are indicated on the
`tables next to the appropriate mean value, using the following
`abbreviations: * p  .05; ** p .01; *** p .001. Statistically
`significant results for trend test are indicated on the tables next
`to the appropriate mean value, using the following abbrevia-
`tions: a p .05; b p .01; c p  .001.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Survival, Clinical Observations, Body Weight Gain, and
`Food Consumption
`
`Glatiramer Acetate Studies
`
`In the rat chronic toxicity study, treatment was well toler-
`ated at the tested dose levels. Six animals died during the six
`months of the study, but none of these was considered to be
`related to treatment, as the deaths were evenly distributed
`among the dose groups including control animals, and since the
`pathological examination did not reveal any association to
`treatment. Two of these animals died accidentally as result of
`the bleeding procedure. There were no effects on body weight
`gain or food consumption at any dose level, except for a slight,
`probably incidental, increase in weight for high-dose females
`during the interval of weeks 1–4. Clinical observations were
`restricted to occasional rough hair coat, stained fur, and appear-
`ance of sores at the injection sites that were noted occasionally
`in rats in the 10 and 30 mg/kg/day GA groups. Few dosing
`sites were abandoned or left to recover because of the above
`mentioned findings.
`
`
`Page 3 of 15
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2014-00644
`
`

`

`Vol. 40, No. 1, 2012
`
`TOXICITY OF GLATIRAMOIDS COMPOUNDS
`
`43
`
`In the monkey GA study, one female of the intermediate
`dose group was removed from the study because of poor food
`consumption and loss of body weight. Histopathology revealed
`lymphoid and bone marrow atrophy and adrenal cortical hyper-
`trophy, signs that are consistent with stress. Because of the iso-
`lated nature of the mid-dose finding, the condition of this
`animal was not considered to be treatment related. Clinical
`signs in the remaining animals were restricted to the sites of
`injection. Thickening of the skin was noted in all treated
`groups, with high-dose animals experiencing greater frequency
`and earlier occurrence, starting generally by week 11. Signs in
`the low-dose group of 3 mg/kg were milder and noted from
`week 20. Sores were occasionally accompanied by swelling
`and abscess. By week 52, thickening was consistently noted
`in all high-dose animals.
`
`Protiramer Studies
`
`In the rat chronic study, nine out of seventy-two high-dose
`and one out of fifty-two mid-dose animals died during the
`study, and these deaths were attributed to treatment with protir-
`amer. Seven other deaths were considered unrelated. Clinical
`signs consisting of pallor, subdued behavior, thin appearance,
`stained fur, lacrimation, hair loss, scabs, and piloerection were
`noted in all treated groups. Local reactions to treatment were
`dose dependent and included induration associated with
`erythema and/or hematoma in both the high- and mid-dose
`groups. There was no obvious local reaction to treatment in ani-
`mals given the low dose of 2.5 mg/kg (twice weekly or once
`every four weeks). Most of the local reactions to treatment had
`disappeared by the end of the four-week treatment-free period.
`There was a dose-related reduction in mean body weight and
`mean body weight gain in males given protiramer, with signif-
`icant differences and even weight loss in males at the dose lev-
`els of 40 and 300 mg/kg, but not at 2.5 mg/kg or in the females
`of any group. The poor tolerance of animals in the high-dose
`group (300 mg/kg) necessitated the early termination of this
`group in week 20 of the study.
`In the monkey chronic study of protiramer, four unsched-
`uled deaths were noted, two of which were clearly treatment
`related. The two treatment-related cases were animals in the
`high-dose group that were diagnosed at necropsy with multiple
`subcutaneous areas of hemorrhage and vascular necrosis, and
`lymphoid and eosinophilic infiltrates, which were considered
`to be factors contributing to death. It should be noted that the
`first treatment-related death occurred only after more than six
`months of treatment. The two other deaths that were not treat-
`ment related were low-dose animals, one animal that died prob-
`ably from an accident and one animal that was removed from
`the study after being diagnosed as a carrier of hepatitis B. Body
`and organ weights were unaffected by treatment. Occasional
`animals in the high-dose group were salivating or subdued,
`or had loss of balance, were retching or circling, had stiff limbs,
`or were motionless. In the severe cases, there was also a
`decrease in blood pressure, decrease in body temperature, and
`increase in respiratory rate. These signs started appearing after
`
`seven weeks and were more pronounced and frequent after thir-
`teen weeks. Accordingly, a decision was taken in week 40 to
`reduce the high-dose level from 60 to 30 mg/kg.
`Injection site reactions were observed in all treated monkeys
`in a dose-dependent manner. In the control animals, the lesions
`were infrequent and consisted mostly of scabs, and slight
`erythema and induration at a very low incidence (usually single
`animals on a very small number of occasions). Skin lesions at
`the injection site in animals treated at 2 mg/kg once every four
`weeks were similar to those in controls. In animals treated at
`2 mg/kg twice weekly, there was a slight increase in the
`incidence and severity of the lesions of the type seen in control
`animals, and in addition, tumefaction was noted. Injection site
`lesions in animals treated at 10 mg/kg were more frequent and
`pronounced. The frequency and severity of the injection site
`lesions were greatest in the animals treated with 60/30 mg/kg.
`Because of the severity of these lesions, the original injection
`sites could not be used starting from week 40, and new
`injection sites were introduced. Lesions at the new sites of
`injection were similar to those seen in this dose group at the
`beginning of the study, indicating that these reactions do not
`involve immunological sensitization.
`
`Clinical Chemistry and Hematology
`
`Glatiramer Acetate Studies
`
`In the rat study, there was no effect of the GA treatment on
`hematology or clinical chemistry results. In the monkey study,
`there were occasional minor changes in AST and ALT values at
`the high dose level (Table 1). However, these changes were spora-
`dic, minimal, and without a clear dose- or time-dependent rela-
`tionship. There were no corroborating histological findings.
`
`Protiramer Studies
`
`In the rat study, hematology analyses revealed a minor
`decrease in activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and
`prothrombin time (PT) and a small increase in platelet counts
`in the males and females given 40 and 300 mg/kg (Table 2).
`A small decrease in red blood cell count and hemoglobin con-
`centration was evident in females given 40 and 300 mg/kg.
`This effect was accompanied by a slightly higher percentage
`of reticulocytes in these groups of females. Red blood cell para-
`meters were also slightly affected in males at both dose levels,
`but to a lesser extent than in the females, with a slightly
`increased reticulocyte percentage at 300 mg/kg. The absolute
`and relative polymorphonuclear neutrophil counts were
`increased in females given 40 mg/kg and in males and females
`given 300 mg/kg, associated with reduced relative lymphocyte
`counts. There was also an increase in the absolute and relative
`monocyte counts at the end of the treatment-free period in
`females given 300 mg/kg (Table 2). The above treatment-
`related changes in hematology and coagulation parameters
`were no longer evident at the end of the four-week treatment-
`free period, except for the decreased PT time and increased
`monocyte and platelet counts in females given 300 mg/kg.
`
`
`Page 4 of 15
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2014-00644
`
`

`

`44
`
`RAMOT ET AL.
`
`TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
`
`TABLE 1.—Mean clinical chemistry in male and female glatiramer acetate–treated monkeys at week 52.
`
`Dose level (mg/kg/d)
`
`AST (IU/L)
`ALT (IU/L)
`Alk Phos (IU/L)
`GGT (IU/L)
`Na (mmol/L)
`K (mmol/L)
`Cl (mmol/L)
`Ca (mmol/L)
`P (mmol/L)
`Glucose (mmol/L)
`Urea (mmol/L)
`Total bilirubin (micromole/L)
`Creatinine (micromole/L)
`Total protein (G/L)
`Albumin (G/L)
`
`Males
`
`Females
`
`0
`
`52
`48
`1492
`154
`147
`4.3
`109
`2.34
`1.8
`3.3
`7.2
`1.2
`85
`83
`46
`
`3
`
`52
`46
`1820
`175
`146
`4.2
`110
`2.34
`1.8
`3.3
`6.4
`2.7
`82
`81
`44
`
`10
`
`50
`49
`1378
`148
`147
`4.2
`111
`2.3
`1.7
`4.1
`6.5
`2.1
`80
`83
`49
`
`30
`
`83***
`75*
`1372
`118
`143
`4.4
`113
`2.35
`1.7
`3.8a
`6.8
`2.7
`88
`87
`46
`
`0
`
`50
`41
`1068
`95
`146
`3.8
`111
`2.3
`1.5
`2.5
`6.5
`2.5
`74
`79
`40
`
`3
`
`58
`42
`1038
`93
`146
`4.2
`108
`2.33
`1.8
`3.7
`6.7
`3
`83
`82
`43
`
`10
`
`52
`49
`936
`93
`146
`4.3
`110
`2.27
`1.7
`3.5
`5.8
`1.5
`79
`86**
`43
`
`30
`
`63*
`53
`1112
`71*
`146
`4.3
`111
`2.3
`1.8
`3.3
`6.4
`1.9
`80
`84*
`45
`
`a Significant at p < .05 using the dose-response test.
`* p < .05
`** p < .01
`*** p < .001
`
`TABLE 2.—Mean hematology parameters in male and female protiramer-treated rats at week 20 for group 4 males and week 26 for other groups.
`
`Males
`
`Females
`
`Dose level (mg/kg)
`
`0
`
`2.5
`
`40
`
`300
`
`2.5 (low)
`
`0
`
`2.5
`
`40
`
`300
`
`2.5 (low)
`
`Red blood cell count (T/L)
`Hemoglobin (g/L)
`Reticulocytes (%)
`Packed cell volume (%)
`Platelet count (G/L)
`Activated partial thromboplastin time (s)
`Prothrombin time (s)
`Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (G/L)
`Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (%)
`Lymphocytes (%)
`Monocytes (G/L)
`Monocytes (%)
`
`8.99
`155
`1.7
`47.1
`1331
`29.4
`21.7
`2.04
`18.8
`76.7
`0.23
`2.1
`
`9.11
`161
`1.3
`48.3
`1314
`32.3
`25.1
`1.48
`17.1
`77.6
`0.22
`2.5
`
`8.31
`145
`1.9
`43.6*
`1688**
`21.6*
`15.6*
`2.79
`26.6
`67.1
`0.33a
`3.2**a
`
`8.11
`143
`1.9
`41.8
`1623a
`21.2a
`16a
`2.79
`23.3
`70.8
`0.32
`2.5
`
`9.16
`158
`1.4
`47.2
`1235
`29.9
`21.2
`2.33
`22.2
`71.5
`0.36
`3.4**
`
`8.12
`153
`1.4
`45.1
`1170
`17.4
`14.1
`0.88
`12.2
`82.8
`0.15
`2.1
`
`8.01
`151
`1.5
`44.7
`1228
`16.7
`14.2
`1.08
`16.8**
`77.4**
`0.17
`2.6
`
`7.76
`146
`1.7
`42.9*
`1328
`16.1
`14.2
`0.99
`14.6
`79.7
`0.16
`2.4
`
`7.21b
`133*b
`2.7b
`39.7*b
`1951**c
`13.8a
`13a
`1.44**b
`17.8*
`76.1*b
`0.29**b
`3.4a
`
`7.73
`151
`2.2
`44.1
`1201
`15.7
`14.5
`0.89
`12
`82.6
`0.19
`2.5
`
`a Significant at p < .05 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`bSignificant at p < .01 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`cSignificant at p < .001 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`* p < .05
`** p < .01
`
`There were several treatment-related changes in serum clinical
`chemistry parameters in males and females given 40 and 300
`mg/kg (Table 3). These parameters included decreased total
`protein and albumin concentrations, increased globulin con-
`centrations,
`increased total cholesterol
`levels, and slightly
`decreased serum sodium. Most of the above treatment-related
`changes in serum clinical chemistry were still evident after the
`treatment-free period (Table 4).
`In the monkey study, hematology evaluation revealed a
`marked dose-related increase in absolute and relative eosino-
`phil counts in the groups treated twice weekly at 2, 10, and
`60 mg/kg throughout the treatment period (Table 5). Animals
`treated with 2 mg/kg once every four weeks were unaffected.
`
`Throughout the treatment period, animals treated at 60 mg/kg
`tended to have lower mean phosphorus, cholesterol, and albu-
`min concentrations, and from week 13, lower globulin concen-
`trations (and lower A/G ratios). After four weeks without
`treatment, these differences had essentially returned to normal,
`although a slight difference in serum cholesterol concentrations
`remained.
`
`Pathology
`
`Glatiramer Acetate Studies
`
`Gross pathology examination at the end of dosing of both
`rats and monkeys did not reveal treatment-related changes in
`
`
`Page 5 of 15
`
`YEDA EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`MYLAN PHARM. v YEDA
`IPR2014-00644
`
`

`

`Vol. 40, No. 1, 2012
`
`TOXICITY OF GLATIRAMOIDS COMPOUNDS
`
`45
`
`TABLE 3.—Mean serum clinical chemistry parameters in male and female protiramer-treated rats at week 20 for group 4 males and
`week 26 for other groups.
`
`Dose level (mg/kg)
`
`Sodium (mmol/L)
`Potassium (mmol/L)
`Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
`Total protein (g/L)
`Albumin (g/L)
`Globulin (g/L)
`Albumin/globulin ratio
`Creatinine (mmol/L)
`
`0
`
`144
`4.4
`1.92
`71
`33
`39
`0.9
`45
`
`2.5
`
`144
`4.5
`1.91
`70
`32
`38
`0.9
`47
`
`Males
`
`40
`
`143
`4.8a
`11.88*a
`69
`24**c
`44*a
`0.6*b
`58a
`
`300
`
`143
`4.8
`7.01
`64
`22
`42*
`0.5
`42
`
`2.5 (low)
`
`0
`
`144
`4.4
`1.84
`72
`33
`39
`0.9
`46
`
`143
`4.2
`2.89
`83
`42
`40
`1
`51
`
`2.5
`
`143
`4.4
`2.7
`80
`41
`39
`1
`52
`
`Females
`
`40
`
`142
`4.5
`4.49
`78
`37*
`40
`0.9
`49
`
`300
`
`2.5 (low)
`
`139*b
`4.6a
`8.46a
`76*b
`34**c
`43
`0.8**b
`51
`
`143
`4.5
`2.61
`81
`41
`40
`1
`57*
`
`aSignificant at p < .05 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`bSignificant at p < .01 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`cSignificant at p < .001 using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test.
`* p < .05.
`** p < .01.
`
`TABLE 4.—Mean serum clinical chemistry parameters in male and
`female protiramer-treated rats at week 30 (end of treatment-free period).
`
`Males
`
`Females
`
`0
`
`145
`1.93
`31
`34
`0.9
`
`300
`
`145
`4.29
`29
`37*
`0.8*
`
`0
`
`143
`2.56
`38
`33
`1.1
`
`300
`
`137**
`15.03**
`28***
`38***
`0.7**
`
`Dose level (mg/kg)
`
`Sodium (mmol/L)
`Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
`Albumin (g/L)
`Globulin (g/L)
`Albumin/globulin ratio
`
`* p < .05.
`** p < .01.
`*** p < .001.
`
`any organ, except for the injection site lesions, and there were
`no changes in either absolute or relative organ weights.
`Histopathology examination of tissue sections from the
`rat study indicated that the pathological changes were con-
`fined to the injection sites (Table 6). Fibrosis was the most
`common lesion, with a dose-related increase in incidence
`and severity. Myositis in the subcutaneous panniculus mus-
`cle was less common and was seen mostly at the high dose
`of 30 mg/kg/day, with a slight increase in males of the 10
`mg/kg GA group. There were sporadic cases of cellulitis,
`with increased severity in the 30 mg/kg dose group. In gen-
`eral, injection site lesions occurred more frequently at the
`posterior injection sites than in the anterior sites. This dif-
`ference might be attributed to the presence of multiple
`layers of
`fascia at
`the anterior sites, which may have
`contributed to increased dispersal of the injected material
`(Figures 1–3).
`Likewise, in the monkey study, treatment-related lesions
`were confined to the injection sites (Table 7) that were charac-
`terized by areas of dermal
`fibrosis,
`in which small-
`mononuclear-cell
`infiltration, occasionally giant cells, and
`rarely, lymphoid germinal follicles were present. In most ani-
`mals, a minor diffuse eosinophilic infiltration was also present.
`
`All groups were affected (including controls), but there was a
`clear treatment-related increase in severity. There were also
`minor and less prevalent edematous, hemorrhagic, and necrotic
`lesions at the injection sites, which showed no clear association
`with administration of GA (Figures 4–7).
`
`Protiramer Studies
`
`the termination of the rat
`Macroscopic examination at
`study revealed enlarged livers and kidneys in the high-dose
`groups. Weighing of the organs confirmed this macroscopic
`observation, and the weights of the liver, kidney, and spleen
`were greater in animals treated at 40 and 300 mg/kg when com-
`pared with concurrent controls at the end of the treatment period.
`In the histopathological examination of the rat
`tissues,
`treatment-related changes were seen in the injection sites, liver,
`and kidneys.
`
`Injection Sites: Fibrosis was seen in all injection sites from
`all groups (Table 8). In control animals, the fibrosis was graded
`as minimal to slight, whereas in other treated groups, the fibro-
`sis was graded as minimal to marked. Associated with fibrosis,
`especially at the high dose level, there were edema, thrombus
`formation, lymphoid cell infiltration, hemorrhage, neovascu-
`larization, and degeneration/regeneration of the panniculus
`skin muscle. In some animals, particularly at the high dose,
`these lesions were associated with subcutaneous necrosis,
`which occasionally formed a central necrotic cavity (Figures
`8–11). As each injection site was used several times, the
`inflammation was a mix of chronic and subacute reactions. The
`changes were dose related, and the increase in severity in
`treated animals indicated poor local tolerance to the test item.
`Following a four-week treatment-free period, previously
`treated animals had subacute to chronic inflammation associ-
`ated with fibrosis, necrosis, and hemo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket