`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)1,2
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.64
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the
`
`caption.
`
`2 Cases IPR2015-01976, IPR2015-01980, and IPR2015-01981 have been joined
`
`with IPR2015-00643, IPR2015-00644, and IPR2015-00830, respectively.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64, Patent Owner Yeda Research and
`
`Development Co., Ltd. (“Yeda”) objects to the admissibility of the documents
`
`identified below that were submitted by Petitioners Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (collectively, “Petitioners”) on March 9, 2016,
`
`for the following reasons:
`
`1.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1067 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`2.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1068 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being cumulative over Exhibit 1089.
`
`3.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1070 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`4.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1071 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being cumulative over Exhibit 1097.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1072 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is
`
`also objected to as hearsay (subject to no exception) under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 801/802.
`
`6.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1073 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`7.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1074 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`8.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1076 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is
`
`also objected to as hearsay (subject to no exception) under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 801/802.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Petitioners’ Exhibit 1077 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is
`
`also objected to as hearsay (subject to no exception) under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 801/802.
`
`10. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1079 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`11. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1080 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`12. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1081 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1082 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`14. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1083 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`15. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1085 (Declaration of Ari Green) is objected
`
`to as unreliable under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell
`
`Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Dr. Green is not an expert
`
`on, for example, glatiramer acetate or the mechanism of action of glatiramer
`
`acetate. He does not possess the requisite credentials or expertise to render
`
`opinions in this case. This Exhibit is further objected to as unreliable under
`
`Federal Rules of Evidence 702/703 because its bases are not of the type
`
`reasonably relied upon by experts in the field in forming an opinion. Patent
`
`Owner further objects to this Exhibit to the extent that the opinions offered
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in this Declaration exceed the scope of Patent Owner’s arguments set forth
`
`in the Patent Owner Response.
`
`16. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1086 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`17. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1087 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being merely cumulative of evidence already presented
`
`by Petitioners in the above-referenced proceedings. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to as hearsay (subject to no exception) under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also objected to because it has not been
`
`properly authenticated as required by Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`18. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1088 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being merely cumulative of evidence already presented
`
`by Petitioners in the above-referenced proceedings.
`
`19. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1089 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being cumulative over Exhibit 1068.
`
`20. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1090 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being merely cumulative of evidence already presented
`
`by Petitioners in the above-referenced proceedings.
`
`21. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1091 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being merely cumulative of evidence already presented
`
`by Petitioners in the above-referenced proceedings.
`
`22. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1092 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009.
`
`23. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1093 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1094 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`25. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1095 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009.
`
`26. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1096 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`27. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1097 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 as being cumulative over Exhibit 1071.
`
`28. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1098 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`29. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1099 (Declaration of Joel Hay) is objected
`
`to as unreliable under Federal Rules of Evidence 702/703 because its bases
`
`are not of the type reasonably relied upon by experts in the field in forming
`
`an opinion. Patent Owner further objects to this Exhibit to the extent that the
`
`opinions offered in Dr. Hay’s Declaration exceed the scope of Patent
`
`Owner’s arguments set forth in the Patent Owner Response.
`
`30. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1100 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009.
`
`31. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1101 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to because it has not been
`
`properly authenticated as required by Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`32. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1102 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`33. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1103 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`34. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1104 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`35. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1105 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`36. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1106 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`37. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1107 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`38. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1108 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`39. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1109 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1110 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009.
`
`41. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1111 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`42. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1112 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`43. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1113 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 as being irrelevant evidence for prejudice, confusion,
`
`waste of time, or other reasons. This Exhibit is also objected to This Exhibit
`
`is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no exception) under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also objected to because it has not been
`
`properly authenticated as required by Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`44. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1114 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 1001-1003. Specifically, Page 3 of the Exhibit has been
`
`highlighted. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`45. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1115 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`46. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1116 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`47. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1117 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`48. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1118 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`49. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1119 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`50. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1120 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`51. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1121 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802.
`
`52. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1122 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`53. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1123 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`54. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1124 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`55. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1125 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`56. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1126 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`57. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1127 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`58. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1128 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`59. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1129 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules
`
`of Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior
`
`to August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to no
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`60. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1130 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is
`
`also objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required
`
`by Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`61. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1131 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is
`
`also objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required
`
`by Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`62. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1132 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`20
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`63. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1133 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`64. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1134 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 to the extent that it is relied upon for any teaching prior to
`
`August 20, 2009. This Exhibit is also objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings. This Exhibit is also objected to as hearsay (subject to
`
`no exception) under Federal Rules of Evidence 801/802. This Exhibit is also
`
`objected to because it has not been properly authenticated as required by
`
`Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
`
`65. Portions of Petitioners’ Exhibit 1135 are objected to under
`
`Federal Rules of Evidence 402/403 because they are not relevant to any
`
`issue in the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`66. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1136 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`21
`
`
`
`67. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1137 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`68. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1138 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it relates to a separate judicial proceeding and is
`
`not relevant to any issue in the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`69. Petitioners’ Exhibit 1139 is objected to under Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence 402/403 because it is not relevant to any issue in the above-
`
`captioned proceedings.
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These objections have been timely made within five business days from the
`
`service of these exhibits, as required by 37 C.F.R. §42.64(b)(1).
`
`
`
`Date: March 16, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Elizabeth J. Holland/
`Elizabeth J. Holland
`Registration No. 47,657
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10019-1405
`P: 212-813-8800
`F: 212-355-3333
`EHolland@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Attorney For Patent Owner
`
`23
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.64 was served electronically via e-mail on March 16, 2016 on the following:
`
`Jeffrey W. Guise
`
`jguise@wsgr.com
`
`Brandon M. White
`
`BMWhite@perkinscoie.com
`
`Shannon Bloodworth
`
`sbloodworth@perkinscoie.com
`
`David Anstaett
`
`DAnstaett@perkinscoie.com
`
`Richard Torczon
`
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`Vince Capuano
`
`vcapuano@duanemorris.com
`
`Christopher Kroon
`
`CSKroon@duanemorris.com
`
`/April E. Weisbruch/
`April E. Weisbruch
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`March 16, 2016