`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 62
`Entered: March 15, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before ZHENYU YANG and TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent
`Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Petitioners’ Motion to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14
`
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2015-01976, IPR2015-01980, and IPR2015-01981 have been
`joined with IPR2015-00643, IPR2015-00644, and IPR2015-00830,
`respectively.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)
`
`
`Petitioners filed a Motion to Seal portions of the Declaration of
`
`Professor Joel Hay, Exhibit 1099 (“Hay Declaration”). Paper 57, 1.2
`
`Petitioners represent that Patent Owner does not oppose the Motion. Id. at 2.
`
`Petitioners’ Motion is granted.
`
`According to Petitioners, the Hay Declaration contains references to
`
`information we previously determined, on Patent Owner’s motion, good
`
`cause exists to seal. Id. at 1 (citing Paper 52). Petitioners represent that the
`
`Hay Declaration also contains references to the deposition of Dr. Grabowski
`
`(Ex. 2148) filed under seal by Patent Owner. Id. (citing Paper 54). In the
`
`concurrently issued Decision on Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal, we have
`
`determined that Patent Owner has shown good cause for sealing the
`
`confidential, proprietary data contained in Exhibit 2148. Paper 60.
`
`Petitioners represent that “[u]pon conferring with Patent Owner, a
`
`redacted version of the Hay Declaration will be filed with only previously-
`
`sealed material redacted.” Paper 57, 2.
`
`Upon considering the content of the Hay Declaration, we determine
`
`that good cause exists for sealing the previously-sealed material contained in
`
`the Hay Declaration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 For ease of reference, paper numbers and exhibits cited in this Decision
`refer to those filed in IPR2015-00643. Similar papers and exhibits were
`filed in the other proceedings.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal is GRANTED.
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a public version of Exhibit 1099, with
`
`only previously-sealed material redacted, shall be filed within five business
`
`days of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey Guise
`jguise@wsgr.com
`
`Brandon White
`BMWhite@perkinscoie.com
`
`Richard Torczon
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`Shannon Bloodworth
`SBloodworth@perkinscoie.com
`
`David Anstaett
`DAnstaett@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Elizabeth Holland
`eholland@goodwinprocter.com
`
`William James
`wjames@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Eleanor Yost
`eyost@goodwinprocter.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
