throbber
Best Practices in Skin Care for the
`Multiple Sclerosis Patient Receiving
`Injectable Therapies
`
`Lynn McEwan, NP, MScN, MSCN; Janet Brown, RN, MSCN; Josée Poirier, BSc, MSCN;
`Janene Spring, RN, BScN, MSCN; Judith Brouillette, RN, BSc, MScN, MSCN; Kathleen Carr, RN,
`MSCN; Christine Guérette, RN, BSc, MBA, MSCN; Colleen Harris, MN, NP, MSCN; Donna Howard,
`RN, BScN, MSCN; Diane Lowden, NMSc(A), MSCN; Nicolee Richard, BScN, MSCN
`
`Although a cure for multiple sclerosis (MS) has not yet been discovered, a number of treatment
`options are available to help control symptoms, slow disease progression, and improve quality of life
`in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). These include disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)
`such as beta-interferons, glatiramer acetate, and natalizumab. Disease-modifying therapies requir-
`ing frequent, self-administered injections can be particularly troublesome for some patients, as they
`may result in localized skin reactions at the injection site. A variety of injection-site reactions (ISRs)
`have been reported, including pain and erythema, lipoatrophy, abscesses and infections, necrosis,
`rash, swelling, and lumps. In order to appropriately distinguish between normal and abnormal reac-
`tions and to determine when further intervention is required, nurses involved in the care of patients
`with MS should be knowledgeable about the potential ISRs associated with DMTs. This best practices
`document was developed by a panel of Canadian MS clinic nurses in order to increase recognition
`among nurses that MS patients are at high risk for skin-site reactions with injectable therapies, and
`to provide the basis for skin-care practices in these patients. It reviews the risk factors associated with
`adverse skin reactions in MS patients treated with injectable therapies; the current attitudes and
`beliefs of nurses with respect to skin care; and the optimal skin-care interventions for MS patients at
`risk for adverse skin reactions when treated with injectable therapies. Areas requiring further research
`are discussed. Int J MS Care. 2010;12:177–189.
`
`Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflam-
`
`matory disease of the central nervous sys-
`tem characterized by the demyelination of
`nerve cells.1 The most common form of the disease is
`relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), in which patients
`experience multiple exacerbations over time. At present,
`there is no cure for MS; however, a number of treat-
`ment options are available to help control symptoms,
`slow disease progression, and improve quality of life in
`patients with RRMS. These include disease-modifying
`therapies (DMTs), which act on the immune system
`and modulate the inflammatory processes involved in
`the disease pathology.2 Medications used for the treat-
`
`ment of RRMS include interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a;
`Avonex, Biogen Idec, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada,
`administered intramuscularly once weekly; or Rebif,
`EMD Serono, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, admin-
`istered subcutaneously 3 times per week), interferon
`beta-1b (IFNβ-1b; Betaseron, Bayer Inc, Toronto,
`Ontario, Canada; or Extavia, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`Canada Inc, Dorval, Quebec, Canada; administered
`subcutaneously every 48 hours), glatiramer acetate (GA;
`Copaxone, Teva Canada Innovation, Montreal, Quebec,
`Canada; administered subcutaneously once daily), and
`natalizumab (Tysabri, Biogen Idec; administered intrave-
`nously every 4 weeks). The subcutaneously administered
`
`From the London Health Sciences Centre Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, London, Ontario, Canada (LM); MS Clinic–Eastern Health, St. John’s,
`Newfoundland, Canada (J Brown); Clinique Sclérose en Plaques, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Can-
`ada (JP); Fraser Health MS Clinic, Burnaby Hospital, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (JS); Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec,
`Canada (J Brouillette); Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (KC); Clinique Neuro Rive-Sud and Hôpital Charles
`LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada (CG); Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CH);
`Teva Neuroscience, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (DH, NR); and Multiple Sclerosis Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal Neu-
`rological Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (DL). Correspondence: Lynn McEwan, NP, MScN, MSCN, LHSC University Hospital, Room
`A7008, 339 Windermere Rd., London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada; e-mail: lynn.mcewan@lhsc.on.ca.
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`177
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`McEwan et al.
`
`drugs requiring frequent, self-administered injections can
`be particularly troublesome for some patients, as they
`may result in localized skin reactions at the injection site.
`The skin, or integument, is the largest organ, provid-
`ing the body with protection against ultraviolet light,
`injury, and infection and helping to regulate body tem-
`perature. The skin receives about 30% of the body’s
`cardiac output of oxygenated blood and contains nerve
`receptors to help the body adapt to an ever-changing
`environment. It is made up of two main layers—the
`outer epidermis, which constantly regenerates by shed-
`ding dead cells and bringing new cells up from the der-
`mis layer, and the inner dermis, a thicker layer of dense
`connective tissue (Figure 1). When skin is normal and
`healthy, the surface does not differ from surrounding
`skin and is smooth to the touch. When the skin barrier
`is broken through injection, the door is opened to harm-
`ful environmental factors.
`A variety of injection-site reactions (ISRs) have been
`reported with the DMTs, including pain and erythema,
`lipoatrophy, abscesses and infections, necrosis, rash,
`swelling, and lumps. Subcutaneous interferon beta
`(IFNβ) injections result in ISRs in 85% to 92% of MS
`patients during the early phase of treatment, as seen
`in the large pivotal trials.3 In a prospective study of 60
`patients on IFNβ therapy, 24% never experienced ISRs,
`57% had an occasional reaction, and 19% had a reaction
`with each injection.4 Women and smokers undergoing
`interferon therapy are reported to be more susceptible
`to adverse skin reactions, although the reason for this is
`not clear.5,6 Mild erythema, induration, and pain are the
`most common adverse events associated with subcutane-
`ous injection of GA.7 Among 251 patients with RRMS
`randomly assigned to treatment with GA or placebo for
`2 years, 66% to 90% of patients given GA developed
`an ISR, compared with 37% to 59% of patients who
`received the placebo.7,8
`
`Figure 1. Normal skin
`
`Although ISRs are rarely serious, they can promote
`negative attitudes about injection therapy and reduce
`adherence to therapy, particularly in the early stages of
`treatment. In addition to providing MS patients with
`appropriate instruction on the preparation and admin-
`istration of injectable therapies, health-care professionals
`must inquire about ongoing issues, assess skin reactions,
`and periodically review the injection technique.
`In May 2009, a panel of Canadian MS clinic nurses
`convened to discuss the scope of a best practices docu-
`ment in order to increase recognition among nurses that
`MS patients are at high risk for skin-site reactions with
`injectable therapies, and to provide the basis for skin-
`care practices in these patients. Subsequently, a search of
`the literature for clinical practice guidelines, systematic
`reviews, relevant research studies, and other types of evi-
`dence was conducted. Where applicable, recommenda-
`tions were made and categorized according to the levels
`of evidence outlined in the “Summary of Recommenda-
`tions.” Anecdotal practices that were identified by the
`MS nurses through consensus but have not been studied
`are identified as “good practices.”
`This best practices document addresses the risk fac-
`tors associated with adverse skin reactions in MS patients
`treated with injectable therapies; the current attitudes
`and beliefs of nurses with respect to skin care; and opti-
`mal skin-care interventions for MS patients at risk for
`adverse skin reactions when treated with injectable thera-
`pies. Areas requiring further research are also discussed.
`
`ISRs Associated with DMTs for MS
`Erythema and Pain
`Erythema is characterized by redness of the skin due
`to inflammation and may involve dilated or congested
`capillaries (Figure 2). It may be localized or generalized
`and may occur suddenly or gradually. Skin color can
`range from bright red in patients with acute conditions
`to pale violet or brown in those with chronic problems.
`Erythema and pain are common in patients receiv-
`ing injectable therapies. In a postmarketing review of
`1443 adverse event reports of ISRs with subcutaneous
`IFNβ-1b, erythema (57%) and pain (30%) were most
`frequently reported and often occurred together.6 An
`international cohort study of 445 patients comparing
`subcutaneous injection-site pain between IFNβ-1b and
`IFNβ-1a found a significant proportion of pain-free
`injections with IFNβ-1b regardless of needle size.9 How-
`ever, injection-site pain may occur with any agent and
`may even present 24 to 48 hours after injection. With
`glatiramer acetate injections, pain, inflammation, and
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`178
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`Best Practices in Skin Care for the MS Patient
`
`needle (REGARD Study).17,23 In comparative studies
`of needle gauge size of 27 versus 29, the thinner needle
`size of 29 gauge demonstrated a significant reduction
`in injection-site pain for both subcutaneous IFNβ-1a
`and GA.16,18 Interferon beta-1b is now available with a
`30-gauge needle, but no studies to date have assessed
`the impact on injection-site pain or reactions. A study of
`patients’ perceptions of using a shorter, thinner needle
`(1 inch/25 gauge vs. 1.25 inch/23 gauge) when inject-
`ing intramuscular IFNβ-1a found that 70% of patients
`identified the 1-inch/25-gauge needle as being more
`comfortable and causing less pre-injection anxiety.15
`Although the use of a smaller, thinner needle (29 or
`30 gauge) and an auto-inject device has been shown to
`reduce pain and reactions,13,15-18 for intramuscular injec-
`tions the needle should be long enough to inject into the
`muscle rather than subcutaneous fat.15,24
`To avoid the development of erythema and pain
`following injection of a DMT, the site should be exam-
`ined before injection, with care taken to avoid injecting
`in damaged areas. The auto-injector and needle tips
`should be kept free of medication and the syringe held
`in an upright position when removing the needle cap to
`reduce the chances of medication adhering to the needle
`tip.13 Following an injection, the nurse should observe
`for redness and palpate the skin by gently pressing the
`fingers over the injection site to feel for lumps, hardness,
`or thickening of the skin. As erythema is commonly
`diagnosed through self-examination, the importance of
`self-examination should be emphasized to patients and
`caregivers, who should be encouraged to report and
`discuss their findings with their health-care professional.
`Depending on the type of erythema, treatment includes
`administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
`(NSAIDs) or corticosteroids.
`Injection-site pain may be reduced by applying
`warm compresses before injection and cold compresses
`after injection for up to 5 minutes.25-27 The application
`of lidocaine/prilocaine cream has also been shown to
`reduce pain and the fear of pain after injection of IFNβ
`in a small cohort of patients with MS.28
`A topical cream with cortisone such as betamethasone
`valerate 0.1% can reduce erythema, as can gentle mas-
`sage for 15 to 30 seconds after IFNβ injection.29
`Lipoatrophy
`Lipoatrophy is a localized loss of subcutaneous adi-
`pose tissue at an injection site and appears as “dents”
`or depressions in the skin, which may range in size and
`severity (Figure 3). Although the exact mechanism lead-
`ing to lipoatrophy is unknown, theories include local
`immune reaction, mechanical injury over time, and
`
`Figure 2. Example of erythema associated
`with injectable DMTs for MS
`
`induration have been reported to occur in 20% to 60%
`of patients.10
`Erythema must be differentiated from purpura, which
`is caused by bleeding into the skin; application of pres-
`sure directly to the skin causes blanching of purpura but
`not erythema. The cause of erythema with DMTs is
`unclear. However, local chemokine induction is believed
`to be an underlying cause of inflammatory skin reactions
`seen in patients receiving subcutaneous IFNβ injec-
`tions.11 It has also been suggested that injection depth
`and injecting into sites with less subcutaneous fat (arms
`and thighs) are contributing factors in injection-site
`erythema.12 The use of auto-injectors and ensuring that
`needle tips are free of medication may reduce erythema.13
`A number of factors may contribute to injection-site
`pain, such as intrinsic drug properties and use of excipi-
`ents in formulation, as well as other formulary proper-
`ties, such as temperature, osmolarity, pH, concentration,
`and injection volume. Additional factors related to
`injection include needle size and shape, location, speed
`of injection and rate of drug administration, the person
`performing the injection, and the individual’s perception
`of pain.14
`Management of Erythema and Pain
`Recognition of formulary components and injection
`techniques contributing to ISRs and pain has led to
`changes in drug formulations and the use of smaller-
`gauge needles and auto-inject devices.9,13,15-21 A new for-
`mulation of subcutaneous IFNβ-1a without fetal bovine
`serum and human serum albumin showed a threefold
`reduction in ISRs compared with the original formula-
`tion (EVIDENCE Study),22 and there were also fewer
`ISRs using the new formulation and a smaller-gauge
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`179
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 3
`
`

`
`McEwan et al.
`
`Figure 3. Example of lipoatrophy
`associated with injectable DMTs for MS
`
`delayed inflammatory response.30 In severe lipoatrophy,
`depressions may measure up to 60 cm2 and be 1 to
`2 cm deep, with normal-appearing overlying skin. Mild
`lipoatrophy may be difficult to detect, and patients are
`sometimes unaware of the condition unless identified by
`a family member or a health-care professional.
`Lipoatrophy can occur with prolonged injection
`therapy and has been observed with injection of GA and
`interferon as well as corticosteroids, insulin, vasopressin,
`growth hormone, dextran, diphtheria/tetanus vaccine,
`and antihistamines.31 Among MS patients, lipoatrophy
`occurs more frequently in those taking GA than in
`those on interferon therapy.32 The reported incidence
`of lipoatrophy among patients on GA has varied from
`15% in an Italian study of 27 patients33 to 64% in a US
`study of 14 patients.34 A retrospective Canadian study
`identified lipoatrophy in 34 of 76 (45%) MS patients, all
`of whom were female; in some, the condition appeared
`within 28 ± 14 months of therapy.30 Lipoatrophy was
`defined as severe in 5 patients, moderate in 9 patients,
`and mild in 20 patients; however, severity of lipoatrophy
`may be subjective and difficult to define. Interferon beta
`injections can also cause lipoatrophy, as found in 46% of
`patients in a study of 12 cases of panniculitis.35 Although
`longer treatment times are more strongly associated with
`development of lipoatrophy, a small number of cases
`occur within months of injection.
`Initial reports on the pathology of lipoatrophy
`described it as a noninflammatory condition, but sub-
`cutaneous localized panniculitis at the injection site has
`been described.10,36 More recent reports have noted as
`much as a 40% T-cell subcutaneous infiltration, more
`suggestive of lobular panniculitis.34 Lipoatrophy in
`
`patients on IFNβ often shows features of pancreatic
`panniculitis.35
`Lipoatrophy is more common in females, occurring
`predominantly on the anterolateral surface of the arms
`and thighs.33 It occurs more commonly in both men and
`women who are prone to cellulite formation. Uncer-
`tainty exists about whether lipoatrophy is permanent
`and how to treat it. The condition can be disfiguring
`and may adversely affect quality of life, including social
`functioning, emotional functioning, and mental health.30
`Management of Lipoatrophy
`As interventions to reduce the appearance of lipoat-
`rophy are limited, preventive measures should be rein-
`forced regularly with MS patients undergoing treatment
`with an injectable DMT. MS nurses should regularly
`review current injection preparation and site rotation
`procedures with MS patients and their care partners to
`ensure that they understand the rationale for injecting
`into healthy tissue—to avoid lipoatrophy and to ensure
`adequate absorption of medication. When therapy is ini-
`tiated, and at regular follow-up intervals, the MS nurse
`should ensure that patients are able to recognize lipoat-
`rophy through visual inspection and manual palpation.
`Patients and caregivers should be advised to report the
`appearance of lipoatrophy. Patients should be advised to
`rotate their injection sites regularly and to avoid inject-
`ing in or near an area of lipoatrophy.37-40 At scheduled
`follow-up visits, the MS nurse should inspect injection
`areas to identify any areas of pitting.
`If lipoatrophy occurs, the MS nurse should assess the
`injection and rotation practices and reinforce appropriate
`procedures, including the setup and appropriate depth
`selection of the auto-injector and preparation of the
`prefilled syringe. A ring left on the surface of the skin
`following the use of the auto-injector or syringe is an
`indication of excessive pressure being applied to the skin.
`Attempts to correct lipoatrophy through autologous
`fat transplantation or the use of commercial cosmetic
`fillers have achieved some benefits but are not commonly
`used in MS patients.41,42 Successful use of local injection
`of dexamethasone in insulin-related lipoatrophy has been
`reported, but no studies of this treatment have been con-
`ducted in MS patients.43
`Potential areas of exploration in the management of
`lipoatrophy include blocking the localized inflamma-
`tory reaction and thereby reducing the damage to the
`subcutaneous tissue, as well as the possibility that dam-
`aged subcutaneous tissue may decrease absorption and
`therefore efficacy.
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`180
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 4
`
`

`
`Injection-Site Infections
`Injection-site infections can include cellulitis (Figure
`4) and soft-tissue abscesses (Figure 5). Cellulitis is diffuse
`inflammation that involves the region from the stratum
`corneum to the subcutaneous fat. It occurs where the
`skin barrier has previously been broken through cuts,
`blisters, cracks in the skin, or insect bites, or by injecting
`drugs, either subcutaneous or intramuscular. Conditions
`such as diabetes, obesity, or others that affect circulation
`can also increase the risk of cellulitis. The patient may
`present with a spreading area of redness, superficial cuta-
`neous edema, warmth, and pain around the injection
`site,44 and the skin may have the appearance of orange
`peel (peau d’orange) (Figure 4). This may or may not
`be accompanied by systemic manifestations of fever,
`tachycardia, and leukocytosis. Cellulitis is often caused
`by streptococcal or staphylococcal bacteria, which are a
`part of the normal skin flora and do not cause infection
`unless the skin is broken. It can occur within 1 to several
`days after skin trauma. Cellulitis is usually a clinical diag-
`nosis, and local skin cultures may not identify causative
`bacteria.
`An abscess is a collection of liquid or pus in the subcu-
`taneous fat, fascia, or muscle and may be sterile or septic
`(Figure 5). A mass under the skin with redness, warmth,
`pain, swelling, and fluctuance is suggestive of an abscess.
`Sterile abscesses are caused by irritants such as drugs or
`foreign bodies (eg, splinter), whereas septic abscesses are
`caused by bacteria.45 When a medication is injected and
`not absorbed, it can cause irritation to the surrounding
`tissue, forming a sterile abscess with no infection. Over
`time, the sterile abscess may form a hard mass or lump.
`An abscess usually spreads beneath the skin rather than
`extending to the surface of the skin, thus encapsulating
`the collection of liquid or pus. This encapsulation may
`prevent spread to other sites but also prevents immune
`cells from attacking the bacteria. Localized signs of
`inflammation, erythema, pain, swelling, or warmth on
`touch are signs of both sterile and septic abscesses but are
`usually more severe with an infectious etiology. Septic
`abscesses may be accompanied by fever and/or regional
`lymphadenopathy, while sterile abscesses are not.45
`An infectious etiology of an abscess can be deter-
`mined by needle aspiration or surgical drainage of
`material from the mass, with laboratory confirmation of
`microbiological organisms through Gram stain or cul-
`ture. If a sample of material cannot be obtained, imaging
`techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomog-
`raphy (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
`or clinical evidence of fluctuance (wavelike motion on
`palpation due to fluid) can also be used to diagnose an
`
`Best Practices in Skin Care for the MS Patient
`
`Figure 4. Appearance of cellulitis (ie,
`orange peel or peau d’orange)
`©2009 Logical Images, Inc. Used by permission.
`
`abscess, but not to differentiate between sterile and septic
`etiologies.45
`The literature contains little information on the
`prevalence of skin and soft-tissue infections associated
`with MS injectable therapies. However, premarketing
`controlled drug trials have demonstrated a low incidence
`of injection-site infections in patients on drug therapy,
`with a reported incidence of injection-site abscess of
`approximately 1% to 2.5%.37,46 A recent survey of MS
`nurse experts from 15 MS centers in North America also
`found a low incidence of injection-site infections—0%
`to 4.5% for cellulitis (mean, 1.01%) and 0% to 3.0%
`for abscess (mean, 0.37%). There were no reports of
`injection-site infections in the pediatric population (L
`McEwan, unpublished data).
`Predisposing factors for injection-site skin infections
`and abscesses identified in other populations undergoing
`treatment with injectable therapies have included mul-
`tidose vials, reuse of needles, poor hygiene, obesity, and
`immunodeficiency.47,48 However, no such factors in MS
`patients have been clearly identified. Suggested factors
`include poor injection technique, inadequate skin cleans-
`ing, excessively shallow injections, and repeated use of
`the same injection site.5 In a survey of MS nurses on
`
`Figure 5. Example of an abscess developing
`4 weeks after injection of IFNβ-1a
`(Courtesy of Colleen Harris, RN.)
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`181
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 5
`
`

`
`McEwan et al.
`
`injection-site infections, one nurse noted recurrent infec-
`tion after systemic corticosteroid treatment (L McEwan,
`unpublished data).
`Management of Injection-Site Infections
`Cleansing of the injection site with alcohol is con-
`sidered to be the optimal skin preparation to avoid
`infection.49 Cleansing the skin with 70% alcohol for
`5 seconds can reduce bacteria counts by 82% to 91%.
`However, diabetic patients who did not use skin prepa-
`ration before insulin injection every other week for 3 to
`5 months had no incidence of injection-site infection.49
`Similar results were found for patients receiving botuli-
`num toxin type A injections without alcohol skin prepa-
`ration.50 In the use of insulin, infection is more likely to
`be caused by contaminated needles, syringes, and solu-
`tions than by lack of skin preparation.51
`Treatment for mild or typical cases of infection
`should include use of an appropriate oral antimicro-
`bial agent.52 Severe cases may require hospitalization
`and intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Although the
`usual course of therapy is 10 to 14 days, a 5-day course
`of antibiotic treatment has been shown to be as effective
`as a 10-day course in uncomplicated cellulitis.53 In some
`cases, cutaneous inflammation may worsen during the
`first 24 hours of antimicrobial treatment because of the
`sudden destruction of pathogens, releasing inflammatory
`enzymes. Administration of adjunct corticosteroids may
`reduce inflammation but does not alter outcome.54,55
`Elevation of the affected site may promote drainage of
`edema and inflammatory substances.
`Generally, sterile abscesses resolve spontaneously
`and do not require treatment. Use of warm compresses
`over the abscess may hasten drainage or reabsorption
`of the abscess. Treatment for septic abscesses should
`include incision and removal of collected material and
`pus. Adjunct antimicrobial therapy varies and should be
`based on Gram stain, culture, and symptoms. Currently,
`there is insufficient evidence to support abscess cav-
`ity packing or wound closure, and the former has been
`associated with increased pain.56-60 However, in a ran-
`domized trial comparing primary closure of superficial
`abscesses with conventional packing, duration of healing
`was significantly decreased with primary closure.60 Clini-
`cal trials are lacking on the appropriate management of
`abscesses.
`Proper diagnosis is the key to effective management
`of patients with injection-site infections. Although nurs-
`es may not be responsible for prescribing drug therapy,
`they should have knowledge of the signs and symptoms
`of cellulitis and soft-tissue abscesses and be familiar with
`treatment recommendations. Nurses also have a funda-
`
`mental role in the prevention of injection-site infections
`by educating patients on correct injection technique and
`skin care.
`Induration, Swelling, Lumps, Rash, and
`Necrosis
`Although swelling and induration are sometimes used
`interchangeably, an induration is a localized hardening
`around the injection site that is usually well demarcated
`with palpable borders (Figure 6), while swelling is typi-
`cally caused by fluid accumulation in tissue and may be
`soft or firm.61 Induration may appear several hours after
`injection and last from 24 to 72 hours, causing a feel-
`ing of warmth, itching, hypersensitivity to touch, and
`swelling, and forming a round or elliptical lump less
`than 5 cm2 in size. Thirteen percent of the 1443 ISRs
`reported over 30 months of postmarketing surveillance
`of IFNβ-1b were of induration.6 The mechanisms of
`injection-site inflammation in patients on interferon
`therapy are unknown but are thought to involve an
`inflammatory response to interferon influenced by the
`injection path and depth, with inflammation less likely
`to occur in areas with a higher proportion of subcutane-
`ous fat such as the abdomen or buttocks.12 In the phase
`3 clinical trial of GA, induration affected 19% of 125
`subjects treated with GA.7 In some cases, these reactions
`persisted for several days.
`In some patients, erythematous patches develop
`around injection sites, leading to necrotic ulcers (Fig-
`ure 7).62 Necrosis has been reported in 3% to 5% of
`patients on IFNβ-1b therapy3,6; however, necrosis is
`probably underreported, as many adverse event report-
`ing systems rely on passive reporting by clinicians.6
`Cutaneous necrosis has also been described in patients
`on intramuscular IFNβ-1a.63 One case of subcutaneous
`injection giving rise to persistent erythematous plaques
`has been reported.64 Risk factors for necrosis include
`
`Figure 6. Induration associated with
`injectable DMTs for MS
`(Courtesy of Stanley Hashimoto, MD, Division of Neurology,
`Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia.)
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`182
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 6
`
`

`
`Best Practices in Skin Care for the MS Patient
`
`Figure 7. Necrosis associated with
`injectable DMTs for MS
`(Courtesy of Colleen Harris, RN.)
`
`incorrect injection techniques, insufficient needle length,
`cold drug, repeated use of the same injection site, and
`excessive exposure of recent injection sites to sunlight or
`ultraviolet rays.12
`Although rash is not a common ISR, all DMTs have
`had isolated reports of either localized or systemic “rash-
`like” reactions (Figure 8). A cutaneous lesion resembling
`lupus erythematosus has been described in MS patients
`receiving IFNβ injections.65-67 A more widespread ery-
`thematous, maculopapular rash occurring on the trunk
`and extremities following intramuscular injection of
`IFNβ-1a has also been reported.68 In one report, red,
`vascular, itchy lesions developed after injection of IFNβ
`in the arms or abdomen but not in the thighs, and the
`problem resolved after the patient used the correct injec-
`tion technique with a longer needle.69 Interferon beta
`has also been associated with limited or diffuse systemic
`cutaneous sclerosis.62,70 There have been case reports of
`focal and diffuse urticaria and pruritus occurring within
`30 minutes to several months after the initiation of GA,
`as well as a single case of urticarial vasculitis.71,72
`The reason for rash formation is unknown, but it has
`been suggested that MS patients have abnormalities of
`platelet activation and that IFNβ may enhance platelet
`aggregation in these patients, causing a platelet-depen-
`dent thrombosis.62
`The literature contains little information on lumps,
`swelling, and redness associated with DMTs in MS.
`These symptoms alone may occur often, possibly disap-
`pearing and then reappearing.
`Management of Induration, Swelling, Lumps, Rash,
`and Necrosis
`As with other ISRs, proper injection-site rotation
`practices are important in preventing induration, swell-
`ing, rash, and necrosis. On scheduled visits, MS nurses
`should review injection preparation procedures with the
`patient and caregivers and inspect injection areas to iden-
`tify any problems. Between visits, patients and caregivers
`
`Figure 8. Example of a rash associated
`with injectable DMTs for MS
`(Courtesy of Stanley Hashimoto, MD, Division of Neurology,
`Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia.)
`
`should be advised to perform regular visual inspection
`and manual palpation of the skin to identify these prob-
`lems.
`To prevent inflammation, the area should be warmed
`sufficiently before injection. Warming also serves to relax
`the tissue, improve medication absorption, and improve
`circulation to allow the medication to be more easily dis-
`persed from the area.29
`If indurations are present, alcohol should not be used
`to clean the skin because it can cause irritation; soap and
`water should be used instead.73 The indurated site may
`be massaged with moisturizing cream, either immedi-
`ately following injection in the case of IFNβ or 24 hours
`after injection in the case of GA. Local application of ice
`has been shown to reduce inflammation due to injec-
`tion, with the effect being most beneficial when per-
`formed immediately after injection.73,74 In cases of pro-
`longed inflammation, local application of heat may be
`useful.73 Antihistamines may also be effective in reducing
`inflammation; however, recent studies have shown no
`significant effect of antihistamine on ISRs associated
`with GA injection.27,75 Subcutaneous desensitization with
`GA has been shown to be effective in patients with focal
`and systemic reactions, enabling them to return to thera-
`py without further reactions.71
`Indurations, swelling, and rashes may respond to
`cortisone cream; however, in cases of necrosis, cortisone
`can delay the healing process and increase the likelihood
`of secondary infections. Betamethasone valerate 0.1%
`cream is recommended for ISRs because the level of
`cortisone is high enough to manage inflammation but
`low enough to prevent additional problems. However,
`betamethasone should not be used on thin, fragile areas.
`Hydrocortisone 1% is insufficient to manage inflamma-
`tion and should not be used.29
`Areas of necrosis must be evaluated for signs and
`symptoms of infection. As incorrect injection practices
`are common causes of necrosis,12 patients who develop
`
`International Journal of MS Care
`183
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 7
`
`

`
`McEwan et al.
`
`necrosis at a DMT injection site may require an evalu-
`ation of their cognitive ability in order to validate their
`understanding of proper self-injection procedures. Treat-
`ment of necrosis generally includes antibiotics or surgery,
`including incision and drainage, debridement, excision,
`and/or skin grafting.6
`
`Overall Good Practices in DMT Injection
`for MS
`Both health-care providers and patients self-adminis-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket