throbber
CME/CNE/CPE Topics
`
`InCongress
`
` Invite a Colleague
`
`Print This Page
`
`<< Back to List
`
`Sign-up for FREE E-mail Alerts
`
`
`All Topics
`AIDS/HIV
`Cardiology
`Endocrinology
`Gastroenterology
`Geriatrics
`Hematology
`Hepatic/Biliary Disorders
`Neurology
`Oncology
`Ophthalmology
`Psychiatry
`Pulmonology
`Rheumatology
`Other Topics
`Faculty
`Podcasts
`About Us
`Contact Us
`FAQ
`
`Every-Other-Day Dosing of Glatiramer Acetate Reduces Adverse Reactions With
` Comparable Efficacy to Daily Dosing: Presented at WCTRMS
`
`Overview of PeerView Publications
`
` By Louise Gagnon
`
` MONTREAL -- September 21, 2008 -- Subcutaneous glatiramer acetate can be
` administered every other day with comparable efficacy to that of daily dosing in patients
` with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), according to research from a 4-year
` study presented here at the World Congress on Treatment and Research in Multiple
` Sclerosis (WCTRMS).
`
` Patients who receive daily injections of glatiramer acetate often develop lipotrophy and
` injection-site reactions, explained lead investigator Omar Khan, MD, Wayne State
` University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States. There was interest,
` therefore, in testing the effects of another treatment regimen, apart from 20 mg daily, with
` the goal of minimising adverse events, he said at a poster session here on September 20.
`
` The primary endpoint of this study was based on a composite of clinical, magnetic
` resonance imaging, and immunological outcomes.
`
` A total of 30 treatment-naïve patients were randomised to a standard daily 20-mg dose of
` glatiramer acetate or the same dose every other day. Patients in the 2 treatment groups
` were matched for age, duration of disease, Extended Disability Status Score (EDSS),
` relapse rate, T2-weighted lesions, and gadolinium-enhancing lesions.
`
` After prospective examination at 2 years, patients in each treatment arm had the choice of
` continuing their regimen or switching to the other regimen. Patients were then followed for
` another 2 years. The EDSS was measured every 6 months by a rater who was blinded to
` the study arms.
`
` At 2 years, all patients in the daily-dose arm chose to modify therapy to every-other-day
` dosing.
`
` Investigators found that there were no differences in progression of illness, change in T2-
`weighted lesion volume, or gadolinium-enhancing lesions between the 2 groups at the 2-
`year evaluation.
`
` After 4 years, investigators observed comparable efficacy on all measures between the
` crossover arm and the arm in which patients maintained every-other-day therapy for 4
` years.
`
` A larger study is planned that will examine 3 possible injection regimens of glatiramer
` acetate, including a daily dose, an every-other-day dose, and a weekly dose, said Dr.
` Khan, noting that future research will not be funded by any pharmaceutical manufacturer.
`
` "The goal is to find the optimal dose of the drug," he concluded.
`
`[Presentation title: Randomized, Prospective, Rater-Blinded, Four-Year, Pilot Study to
` Compare the Effect of Daily Versus Every-Other-Day Glatiramer Acetate 20mg
` Subcutaneous Injections in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Abstract 902]
`
`--[ TOP ]--
`
`Warning / Disclaimer Privacy Policy
` Copyright © 2000-2016, PeerView Press - Medical Education Resource
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1087 PAGE 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket