throbber
(median change -780, -610 and -214 [5.25 mg /kg] and -534, -404 and
`-122 [3.5 mg /kg], respectively). Levels subsequently recovered slightly
`until redosing at Week 48, followed by a second (comparable) nadir.
`Lower CD4 /CD8 ratios were due to preferential reductions in CD4
`versus CD8 cells. Reductions were also observed in CD4 naïve and
`memory (CD45RA and CD45RO) T- helper cells, and to a lesser
`extent in CD8 naïve and memory cytotoxic T cells. B -cell (CD19)
`marker also revealed rapid reductions to nadir values at Weeks 9
`and 16, followed by more marked recovery than observed with T- cells.
`Conclusions: Treatment with cladribine
`tablets differentially
`affected CD4, CD8 and CD19 subpopulations. These findings may
`suggest a direct effect on T -cell function, humoral B cell activity and
`antigen -presenting cell activity, which may be involved in immune -
`mediated disease pathogenesis.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono S.A. - Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
`
`P817
`
`Early onset of effect of treatment with cladribine tablets for
`relapsing -remitting multiple sclerosis in the 96 -week, phase
`III, double -blind, placebo -controlled CLARITY study
`P. Vermersch, G. Comi, S. Cook, G. Giovannoni, K. Rammohan,
`P. Rieckmann, P.S. Sorensen, P. Chang, A. Hamlett, 13. Musch,
`R. Verjee, S. Greenberg
`University of Lille (Lille, FR); University Vita -Salute (Milan, IT); University
`of Medicine and Dentistry (Newark, US); Barts and The London School of
`Medicine (London, UK); Ohio State University (Columbus, US); University of
`British Columbia (Vancouver, CA); Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, DK);
`Merck Serono S.A. (Geneva, CH)
`Background: Cladribine is activated specifically in lymphocyte sub-
`types resulting in targeted and sustained immunomodulation, which
`provides the rationale for use of cladribine tablets as a short -course
`annual treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the time
`of onset of treatment effect with cladribine tablets relative to placebo,
`in the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine tablets Treating multiple sclerosis
`orally) study in patients with relapsing- remitting MS (RRMS).
`Methods: Patients with RRMS
`(McDonald criteria; Expanded
`Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 0 -S.5) were randomised 1:1:1 to
`cladribine tablets (cumulative dose of 5.25 or 3.5 mg /kg), or matching
`placebo. Cladribine tablets were given in short courses (once daily for
`4 -5 days) in 4 or 2 consecutive months (28 -day periods) in the first 48
`weeks, then 2 short courses at Weeks 48 and 52 (for both groups).
`Qualifying relapses were evaluated serially throughout the study,
`and MRI parameters (T1 -Gd +, active T2, and combined unique [CU]
`lesions per patient per scan) were evaluated at 24, 48 and 96 weeks
`post -randomisation.
`Results: The ITT population comprised 456, 433 and 437 patients
`randomised to 5.25 mg /kg, 3.5 mg /kg or placebo groups, respectively.
`Differences in qualifying relapse rate between active treatment groups
`vs. placebo were apparent as early as 4 weeks post first treatment
`course (5.25 and 3.5 mg /kg vs. placebo: 0.27 and 0.23 vs. 0.42, respec-
`tively). Statistically significant differences for all three MRI parameters
`were also evident at the first assessment (mean number of lesions per
`patient per scan in the 5.25 and 3.5 mg /kg vs. placebo groups at Week
`24: 0.07 and 0.07 vs. 0.97 for T1 Gd+ lesions, 0.33 and 0.45 vs. 1.59
`for active T2 lesions, and 0.38 and 0.49 vs. 1.91 for CU lesions,
`respectively).
`Conclusions: Treatment with cladribine tablets resulted in early
`onset of effect in clinical and MRI outcomes. Taken together with
`the favourable tolerability and safety results observed in this study
`(reported elsewhere),
`these findings provide strong support for
`annual short -course treatment with cladribine tablets in patients
`with MS.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono S.A. - Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
`EXHIBIT JÇi (Q
`
`WIT:
`
`DATE:
`Marsha Yarberry7 CSR
`
`Posters II
`
`S249
`
`P818
`
`Cladribine tablets produce sustained improvements in
`relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis in the 96 -week, phase
`III, double -blind, placebo- controlled CLARITY study
`K. Rammohan, P. Vermersch, G. Comi, S. Cook, G. Giovannoni,
`P. Rieckmann, P.S. Sorensen, P. Chang, A. Hamlett, B. Musch,
`R. Verjee, S. Greenberg
`Ohio State University (Columbus, US); University of Lille (Lille, FR);
`University Vita -Salute (Milan, IT); University of Medicine and Dentistry
`(Newark, US); Borts and The London School of Medicine (London, UK);
`University of British Columbia (Vancouver, CA); Rigshospitalet
`(Copenhagen, DK); Merck Serono S.A. (Geneva, CH)
`Background: Cladribine is activated specifically in lymphocyte sub-
`types resulting in targeted and sustained immunomodulation, which
`provides the rationale for use of cladribine tablets as a short -course
`annual treatment in multiple sclerosis. Here we investigated multiple
`clinical and MRI efficacy parameters over time to assess the persis-
`tence of treatment effect with cladribine tablets relative to placebo,
`from the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine tablets Treating multiple sclerosis
`orally) study in patients with RRMS.
`Methods: Patients with RRMS (McDonald criteria; Expanded
`Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 0 -5.5) were randomised 1:1:1 to
`cladribine tablets (cumulative dose of 5.25 or 3.5 mg /kg), or matching
`placebo. Cladribine tablets were given in short courses (once daily for
`4 -5 days) in 4 or 2 consecutive months (28 -day periods) in the first 48
`weeks, then 2 short courses at Weeks 48 and 52 (both groups). Efficacy
`endpoints included the annualised qualifying relapse rate (primary),
`the proportion of relapse -free patients, and MRI activity measures vs.
`placebo (T1 -Gd +, active T2, and combined unique [CU] lesions/
`patient /scan).
`Results: The ITT population comprised 456, 433 and 437 patients ran-
`domised to 5.25 mg /kg, 3.5 mg/kg or placebo groups, respectively. In
`the cladribine 5.25 mg /kg, 3.5 mg /kg and placebo groups 95.6 %, 93.8%
`and 66.6% patients, respectively, were Tl -Gd+ lesion -free at Week 24;
`94.1 %, 94.2% and 77.1% patients were Tl -Gd+ lesion -free at Week 96;
`78.1 %, 76.2% and 49.7% patients were T2 lesion -free at Week 24; and
`82.2 %, 82.2% and 61.6% patients were T2 lesion -free at Week 96. The
`proportions of patients that were relapse -free in the cladribine 5.25 mg/
`kg, 3.5 mg /kg and placebo groups were, 91.2 %, 92.1% and 82.8 %,
`respectively, at Week 24; 86.0%, 85.9% and 74.1% at Week 48; and
`78.9 %, 79.7% and 60.9% at Week 96. Reductions in relapse rate and
`MRI lesion count were also observed at these time points.
`Conclusions: Treatment with cladribine tablets resulted in sus-
`tained, consistent benefits on clinical and MRI outcomes. The early
`beneficial effects across several MRI parameters of disease activity were
`sustained at Week 96, 44 weeks after the last treatment dose. Taken
`together with the rapid improvement and favourable tolerability and
`safety results observed in this study (reported elsewhere), these find-
`ings provide strong support for annual short -course treatment with
`cladribine tablets in patients with MS.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono S.A. - Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
`
`P819
`
`Glatiramer acetate 20mg subcutaneous twice -weekly versus
`daily injections: results of a pilot, prospective, randomised,
`and rater -blinded clinical and MRI 2 -year study in relapsing -
`remitting multiple sclerosis
`O. Khan, J. Perumal, C. Caon, A. Tselis, Z. Latif, W. Ching, F. Bao,
`I. Zak
`Wayne State University School of Medicine (Detroit, US)
`Objective: The optimal dose of glatiramer acetate (GA) in RRMS
`remains unknown. We have previously shown that GA administered
`on alternate days appears to be as effective as daily GA. There is con-
`siderable interest in studying a more patient friendly dosing regimen
`of GA that may be as efficacious and better tolerated than daily GA.
`Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, rater -blinded
`study to compare the clinical and MRI outcomes of GA 20 mg SC
`administered twice a week to GA administered daily. RRMS patients
`
`Multiple Sclerosis 2009; 15: 5151 -S269
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1068 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`5250
`
`Posters II
`
`receiving GA 20 mg SC daily for at least one year were randomized to
`either continue in the same fashion or switch to GA 20 mg SC twice
`weekly. Clinical assessments including EDSS were performed every 6
`months and brain MRI scans were obtained at baseline and month 24.
`Results: 48 RRMS were randomized into two equal groups of either
`GA 20 mg SC daily or GA 20 mg SC bi- weekly. Both groups were well -
`matched for clinical demographics and MRI features at baseline. All
`patients remained in the study for the entire duration. After two years,
`the annualized relapse rate, mean EDSS, proportion of relapse -free
`patients, and the proportion of patients without disease progression
`were similar in the two groups. Brain MRI also did not demonstrate
`any significant differences in T2W or T1W lesion, or in the percentage
`brain volume change between the two groups. However, the inci-
`dence of lipoatrophy, local injection site reactions, and immediate -
`post injection systemic reactions were significantly lower in the GA
`twice -weekly group. Detailed analysis of the results will be presented.
`Conclusion: This study provides further evidence that GA adminis-
`tered less frequently than daily may be as efficacious and better tol-
`erated than GA administered daily. This may have a significant
`impact on improving compliance and tolerability while maintaining
`the desired immunomodulating effect of GA. Furthermore, this may
`also have a favorable economic impact. Larger, multi- center studies
`are warranted to confirm our findings and address a critical need of
`the MS patient community.
`
`P820
`
`Conversion of new inflammatory lesions to persistent black
`holes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
`participating in a phase 2 trial of DNA vaccine
`encoding myelin basic protein (BHT -3009)
`A. Papadopoulou, S. Traud, A. Rahman, J. Quan, R. King, H. Garren,
`L. Steinman, G. Cutter, L. Kappos, E.W. Radue
`
`University Hospital (Basel, CH); MIAC (Base!, CH); Bayhill Therapeutics
`(San Mateo, US); University of Alabama (Birmingham, US)
`Background: There
`is evidence that persistent Tl- hypointense
`lesions, (persistent black holes, PBH) correlate better than T2 lesions
`with irreversible tissue damage, axonal loss and disability progression,
`In a Phase 2 Trial of a DNA Vaccine encoding Myelin Basic Protein
`(BHT -3009) in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) the
`median percentage change in Tl- hypointense lesion volume was
`-3.76% in the low dose treatment group compared with 0% for pla-
`cebo (p =0.08) (Garren et al, Ann. Neurol. 2008).
`Objective: To determine the evolution of new inflammatory lesions
`to PBH and examine changes in lesion characteristics, such as size and
`degree of hypointensity, in BHT -3009 treated patients compared with
`placebo.
`Methods: A post -hoc, rater -blinded evaluation of MRI scans collected
`during year 1 of the phase 2 trial was performed in RRMS patients,
`randomly assigned to receive placebo 0.5mg BHT -3009 or 1.5mg BHT -
`3009. New and enlarging lesions (candidate lesions: CL) were selected
`at the first and second on -study MRI (month 2 and 4) and were
`tracked on month 12 for Tl- signal evolution. Lesions hypointense
`on Tl- weighted pre contrast images of months 2 and 4 were consid-
`ered acute black holes (ABH) and lesions not enhancing and hypoin-
`tense on month 12 were considered PBH. Size and degree of
`hypointensity of ABH and PBH were also determined.
`Results: 650 CL were found in 155 of 267 patients in the per protocol
`population, 180 CL in 50/87 patients on placebo, 239 CL in 57/96
`patients on 0.5 mg BHT -3009 and 231 CL in 48/84 patients on 1.5 mg.
`462/650 CL were Gd enhancing. Average proportions of CL evolving
`into PBH were 50/180 (0.28) for placebo, 55/239 (0.23) for low dose
`and 49/231 (0.21) for high dose treated patients. The mean proportion
`of CL per patient developing into PBH was 0.25 in the two treatment
`groups (0.28 in the low dose and 0.21 in the high dose treatment
`group) and 0.29 in the placebo arm.
`Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis a trend to lower propor-
`tions of CL and CL per patient evolving into PBH in treated patients
`compared with placebo was detected.
`
`Supported by: Bayhill Therapeutics.
`
`Immunosuppression
`
`P821
`
`Cancer risk in a MS population treated with
`immunosuppressants
`Y. Handouk, S. De Riso, E. Perticaroli, M. Danni, V. Angeleri,
`L. Provinciali
`
`Neurological Clinic (Ancona, IT)
`Background: Use of the immunosuppressant drugs (mitoxantrone,
`methotrexate, azatioprine, etc..) are linked to cancer risk.
`Objective: we evaluated the presence of cancer in our multiple
`sclerosis (MS) cohort.
`Methods: In a population of 616 MS patients, we followed up 73
`patients, previously treated (43) or actually in treatment (30) with
`immunosuppressants: 10 with mitoxantrone (MTX) until the maxi-
`mum cumulative dose, 49 with azatioprine (AZA), 2 with methotrex-
`ate (MTH), 2 with ciclofosfamide (CTX). 10 patients received more
`than 1 immunosupressant. The mean follow up period since first
`drug administration was 104.9±62 months (min: 32 months, max:
`348 months). Mean treatment period was 65 ±51 months (min: 12
`months, max: 312 months).
`Results: One patient treated with CTX developed an uterine cancer
`two years after CTX withdrawal. The age at cancer diagnosis was 26
`years. No cancer was developed in patients treated with MTX, AZA
`and MTH.
`Conclusion: The prevalence rate of uterine cancer in our MS cohort
`(1.3 %) was higher than in the general population (0.01 %).
`
`P822
`
`ASPIRE (Azathioprine Secondary Progressive Interferon
`treated patients Randomised Evaluation) study: 2 -year
`double -blind and 1 -year open, randomised, multicentre,
`pilot study. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)
`and magnetic resonance data
`E. Montanari, L. Manneschi, I. Pesci, L. Motti, E. Merelli, M.R. Tola,
`D. Caputo, L. Provinciali, E. Scarpini, M.G. Marrosu, A. Ghezzi,
`P. Cavalla, L. Durelli
`Osp. Civile (Fidenza, IT); Osp. Civile (Reggio Emilia, IT); University of
`Modena (Modena, IT); Cl. Neurologica (Ferrara, IT); Cl. Neurologica
`(Milan, IT); Cl. Neurologica (Ancona, IT); Cl. Neurologica (Cagliari, IT);
`Cl. Neurologica (Gallarate, IT); Cl. Neurologica (Turin, IT); Cl. Neurologica
`(Orbassano, IT)
`Combination therapy has been routinely used in autoimmune disease
`and, in the last years, even for multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the
`study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azathioprine
`(AZA) when added to IFN f3-lb in patients with secondary progressive
`MS who had an incomplete response to IFN fi-lb. The study provides
`an overall evaluation of illness stabilization, with the primary end-
`point being the variation in MS functional composite (MSFC) over the
`2 -year double -blind and 1 -year open treatment period. Secondary
`endpoints were Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) variability,
`quality of life (QOL) effects according to the MSQOL -54 Instrument,
`magnetic resonance (MRI) data, neutralizing antibodies and cyto-
`chine evaluations.
`85 patients completed randomization, 42 with azathioprine and IFN
`13-lb and 43 with placebo and IFN f3-lb treatment. At the end of
`36 months 45 patients completed the study (23 and 21 respectively),
`resulting in an high number of drop -outs. MSQOL -54 and safety data
`analyzed showed a slight worsening in AZA group.
`MSFC data were compared to basal data and showed a slight worsen-
`ing at 36 months in azathioprine group in comparison to placebo.
`MRI data showed a reduction in enhancing lesions only at 12 months
`of treatment in AZA group, while there was not consistent variation in
`the two groups at 24 and 36 months.
`
`Multiple Sclerosis 2009; 15: S151 -S269
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1068 PAGE 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket