throbber
Hyatt RegencyI Chicagn
`
`Chicagn, Illinnis
`
`June 59, 2002
`
`Seem-id International
`
`Multiple Sclet’nsis l/Veek
`
`Multiple Selernsis: A Wnrld View
`
`ullipl-e sclemetis is the must cnrnmnn disnrder af-
`fecting timing adults In the prime cut their tlees-
`The new rniliennium brings a fresh peispectil-Ie on MS
`care: a nest.I uisinn cli empnwennent int patients and
`families and punitive appi'naciies th manage the dis-
`ease, its symptnnn. and He psechesncial implicatiens.
`This new Iriew cut M5 care has spanned the nceans and
`has resulted in The tleI-Ielepment et werlclwide net-
`wnrits at health care providers in multiple sclerosis-
`The Cflnflfll‘titlm at Multiple Sclerttsis Centers. RIMS
`{Rehabilitation in Multiple Eclernsis]. LACTRIMS
`{Latin anterican Enntntittee cm Treatment and Re-
`
`search :in Multiple Scleresis]. and lflMSN [internation-
`al flrgaiiisatinn at Multiple Sclefnsis Nursesl has-s- set
`
`glettsl standards in MS care and research and have cel-
`|ahera1ecl In erganire and ce-spnnsnr this meeting.
`
`Multiple Ecleresis: .I'I ‘ti'I-lniitl 1Jiew pliers an interna-
`ttnnal slew L'In cllitJEaI: and Ieseatch issues in multiple
`
`scleresis. The eppnrtunity is meet. cnniei and nelwerit
`
`with colleagues irnrn natinns located Ihrnughclut the
`wnrlti malt-t- this annual meeting nne run will: nnt want
`In miss. This is the Scrum! etnnttal lntesnatiniial Multi-
`
`ple Eclernrsis week lthe first taking place in Basel. in
`1999} Featuring an integrated research traclt. nttrnei'nss
`wurltslieps. a slatI
`tntailsr in Spanish ier nut Latin
`American delegates. satellite seinpnsia. and an inter-
`natinnal datahaseiregistries meeting [lCDDllulS].
`
`Centerence i-lighiights:
`Basil: research and clinical trials
`
`Ccdlahnratiee internatidnai approaches in: managing
`multiple sclerosis
`Gender issues in multiple sclerosis
`TEchnelngical ad eances in clinical care and research
`Nets-lurking uppertunities
`Exhibits with the latest in services and pmdurts
`Evening events in Chicago's "Magnificent Mlle'
`
`t...as._1.-....-.I. - ill-itilllntill't-I'I'IIIII'IIII H.1FllllI'Ia'i-
`
`l HIHHI
`
` '4" I "'1 I
`
`II I III "II -\.I IH'I
`
`"Li
`
`MYLAN INC. EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 1
`
`MYLAN INC. EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`NONADHERENCE TO IMMUNMODULATION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
`
`Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to outline factors leading to nonadherence or cessation of immunmodulation therapy in a multiple sclerosis clinic pop-
`ulation. The secondary aim is to provide related recommendations to MS patients and nurse educators.
`
`Rationale: Nonadherence has been estimated at greater than 50%. Encouraging adherence to therapy is an integral part of the MS nurse’s role. If only half of all pa-
`tients starting therapy will succeed, we need to learn more about factors relating to unsuccessful therapy attempts.
`
`Methods: A retrospective study of individuals attending a multiple sclerosis out-patient clinic (n = 1,000) will be conducted to identify patients who have received im-
`munmodulating therapy. In addition, patients who have ceased or changed therapy will be identified. Key factors relating to nonadherence will be categorized and
`outlined as they correspond to individual medications. Resulting implications for MS patients and nurse educators will be presented.
`Evelyn Vee McBride, RN, BScN, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
`
`EVALUATION OF A NEW SENSORISED UPPER LIMB TREMOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM IN MS
`
`Developed under the EU programme TREMOR (DE3216) the system consists of linked movement sensors mounted on a lightweight frame. It measures angular di-
`rection, change, velocity and acceleration in 7 degrees of freedom (DOF) at the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints. It is the first system to simultaneously measure
`upper limb kinetic and intention tremor at all three joints and at full range of movement (ROM). Bespoke software allows the collection, storage, retrieval, and
`analysis of recorded signals. A graphic display enables the operator to see whole or part recordings and pinpoint the part of the movement trajectory where tremor
`occurs. Three movement tests were performed encompassing normal functional ROM the “finger to nose test", the “police, stop ” test and the “OK” test. Reliabili-
`ty of the system was tested in 10 control subjects (mean age 45 years). Test-retest values for 10 control subjects showed, modest to good agreement for all move-
`ments and at all linkages. Movements at the wrist showed the poorest agreement. Level of tremor was measured in six MS patients (mean age 47 years, EDSS
`range 6.0 to 7.5). Subjects were clinically assessed using the Fahn tremor rating scale. Mean time taken to accurately perform each test was significantly longer in
`the patient group compared with the control group and longest in those with the greatest tremor (controls 7.6 i 1.95 MS subjects 12.4 i 6.2s). Recorded test time
`and frequency and amplitude of oscillations correlated well with the Fahn score. Whilst elements of the rig and linkage construction need to be improved these
`preliminary studies indicate that the evaluation of tremor at different angular velocities and limb positions is possible with this system. Such information will help
`to develop better therapeutic strategies.
`
`A. Davies Smith, R. Jones, (UK); P. Feys, G. Nuyens, P. Ketelaer (BE); A. Romberg (F); G. Gomes, G. Johnson, J. Cotterill (UK); and S. Scattareggia (IT):
`MS Research Unit, Bristol General Hospital, Bristol UK
`
`THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL EFFECT OF A STRESS MANAGEMENT PRO'IDCOL
`ON PERSONS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
`
`This study examined the effect of a behavioral stress management intervention, including relaxation and visualization components, on the psychological and emo—
`tional aspects of patients’ response to MS. Subjects were randomly divided into treatment and control groups, which upon completion of the study had 227 subjects
`and 150 subjects respectively. The treatment group participated in a one-day workshop where they learned systematic relaxation techniques and a visualization exer-
`cise specific to the effects of MS on the participant’s neural system and functioning. The treatment group was asked to practice these techniques on a regular sched-
`ule. Participation was monitored weekly via telephone contact or e-mail. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the State-Trait Personality Inventory (Speil
`berger, Ritterband, Sydeman, Reheiser & Unger, in Butcher, 1995), Self Efficacy was assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis Self Efficacy (MSSE) scale (Schwartz,
`Coulthard-Morris, Zeng, & Retzlaff, 1996) and the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ-Peterson, et al, 1984). Pretesting of both groups was done immediately pri-
`or to the stress workshop and post-testing was 12 weeks later. Initial data analysis suggests self»efficacy is negatively correlated with depression and anxiety. Males
`tended to present themselves as more hostile than depressed and anxious.
`
`Joan B. Read, PhD, and G. Dean Ericson, PhD, MS Center at Shepherd, Atlanta, GA
`
`ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS :
`A PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENT FOR DIAGNOSIS AND CONTROL OF DYSARTHRIA IN MS
`
`Acoustic analysis provides an interface between speech production and perception and can be used to detect and document the progressive course of motor speech
`disorders and identify subclinical manifestations.
`
`Material and Method: All analyses are performed on the Computer Speech Lab (Model 43008) of Kay. Acoustic characteristics are identified in wide»
`band spectrograms, with frequency range from 0 to 50.000 Hz and time intervals of 3 sec. The linear predictive coding (LPC) method and the analysis of
`the variations of amplitude and fundamental frequency from cycle to cycle may detect symptoms such as phonatory instability and nazalisation. Addi-
`tional acoustic data are obtained through the Multidimensional Voice Profile and the Motor Speech Program. These programs analyze the intonation
`variations, the diadochokinetic rate, the voice tremor and second formant variations during speech productions. All subjects had to sustain the vowel
`/a/ for at least 5 sec., to repeat the syllabes /pa<ta-ka/ and /i-u/ as quickly as possible, and speak standard productions at “normal” rate without un-
`necessary pauses.
`
`Subjects: All subjects performed a perceptual screening of dysarthria (Frenchay — Enderby); 20 normal adult subjects are defined as non dysarthric (10 males, 10 fe-
`males) and 20 individuals with MS (10 males, 10 females) present dysarthria (spastic, spastic ataxic) at different grades (moderate, mild, severe).
`
`Discussion: At this stage of the study, it seems that some acoustic parameters are sensitive to the fluctuations of voice and speech disorders in MS. Degree of voice-
`less, deviation of fundamental frequency, variations of amplitude, tremor, temporal deregulation (dysdiadochokinesy) and imprecise articulation could be considered
`as predictive parameters of specific voice and speech disorders in MS. Results of clinical cases will also be discussed.
`
`Guy Ganty, Speech Therapy Department, National MS Centre, Melsbroek, Belgium
`
`
`85
`
`MYLAN INC. EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 2
`
`MYLAN INC. EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket