throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`ARRIS GROUP, INC. and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case : IPR2015-00635
`U.S. Patent 5,563,883
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`PO Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`Submitted Electronically via the Patent Review Processing System
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Pursuant to the Board’s July 31, 2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 20),
`
`IPR2015-00635
`U.S. Patent No. 5,563,883
`
`
`Petitioners ARRIS GROUP, INC. and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
`
`(“Petitioners”), respectfully request oral argument, currently scheduled for April
`
`26, 2016. Petitioners intend to argue the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1 and 4 of the ’883 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103(a) as unpatentable over MPT 1343: Performance Specification (“MPT
`
`1343”) in view of MPT 1327: A Signalling Standard for Trunked Private
`
`Land Mobile Radio Systems (“MPT 1343”) and MPT 1347: Radio Interface
`
`Specification (“MPT 1347”);
`
`2. Whether claim 3 of the ’883 patent is invalid under § 103(a) as unpatentable
`
`over MPT 1343 in view of MPT 1327 and MPT 1347 and further in view of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,870,408 to Zudnek and U.S. Patent No. 4,920,533 to
`
`Dufresne et al.; and
`
`3. Whether Mr. Lipoff’s September 2013 extensively redacted, unsworn expert
`
`report should be excluded from evidence on grounds of incompleteness and
`
`hearsay and whether it should be excluded since it is being used for
`
`improper impeachment purposes. See FED. R. EVID. 106, 613(b), & 802.
`
`Petitioners request the ability to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for a
`
`PowerPoint display.
`
`1
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00635
`U.S. Patent No. 5,563,883
`
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/ Andrew R. Sommer
`
`Andrew R. Sommer (Reg. No. 53,932)
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`T: (202) 282-5000
`
`Jonathan E. Retsky (Reg. No. 34,415)
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 W. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`T: (312) 558-5600
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner ARRIS Group,
`Inc.
`
`/s/ Michael J. Turton
`
`Mitchell G. Stockwell
`Reg. No. 39,389
`Michael J. Turton
`Reg. No. 40,852
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
`LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`T: (404) 815-6500
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Cox
`Communications, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`Dated: March 21, 2016
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00635
`U.S. Patent No. 5,563,883
`
`
`§ 42.6(e)—CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with § 42.6(e)(1), the undersigned certifies that on the 21st
`
`day of March 2016, the above PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT was served, via electronic mail upon the following counsel for
`
`Patent Owner,
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Andrew R. Sommer/
`Andrew R. Sommer
`(Reg. No. 53,932)
`Counsel for Petitioner ARRIS Group,
`Inc.
`
`Walter E. Hanley, Jr.
`whanley@kenyon.com
`
`Sheila Mortazavi
`smortazavi@kenyon.com
`
`Merri Moken
`MMoken@kenyon.com
`
`Dated: March 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket