`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: January 25, 2016
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ARRIS GROUP, INC. and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-006351
`Patent 5,563,883
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BARBARA A. BENOIT, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and
`MIRIAM L. QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`PETTIGREW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Ms. Merri C. Moken
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.10
`
`
`
`1 Cox Communications, Inc., who filed a Petition in IPR2015-01796, has
`been joined as a petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00635
`Patent 5,563,883
`
`C-Cation Technologies, LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed a motion for pro
`
`hac vice admission of Ms. Merri C. Moken. Paper 36. The motion was
`
`accompanied by a declaration from Ms. Moken in support of the motion.
`
`Paper 36 (Exhibit A). ARRIS Group, Inc. and Cox Communications, Inc.
`
`(collectively, “Petitioner”) have not opposed the motion.
`
`Having reviewed the motion and the declaration of Ms. Moken, we
`
`conclude that Ms. Moken has sufficient qualifications to represent Patent
`
`Owner in this proceeding and that Patent Owner has shown good cause for
`
`Ms. Moken’s pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (setting forth the
`
`requirements for pro hac vice admission) (Paper 7). Ms. Moken will be
`
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in this proceeding as back-up counsel only.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`
`
`It is:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Ms. Merri C. Moken is granted, and Ms. Moken is authorized to represent
`
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Moken is to comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00635
`Patent 5,563,883
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Moken is subject to the USPTO’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00635
`Patent 5,563,883
`
`FOR PETITIONER ARRIS Group, Inc.:
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`asommer@winston.com
`
`Jonathan E. Retsky
`jretsky@winston.com
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER Cox Communications, Inc.:
`
`Mitchell G. Stockwell
`
`mstockwell@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
`
`Michael J. Turton
`
`mturton@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Walter E. Hanley
`whanley@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`David J. Kaplan
`djkaplan@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`David J. Cooperberg
`dcooperberg@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`IPR2015-00635
`IPR2015—0O635
`Patent 5,563,883
`Patent 5,563,883
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
