`
`Page 1
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`
`________________________
` :
`DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, :
`INC., and TULSA DENTAL :
`PRODUCTS LLC d/b/a TULSA:
`DENTAL SPECIALTIES, :
` :
` Plaintiffs, :
` :
` v. : Civil Action No.
` : 2:14-CV-00196(JRG)(DHI)
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC, :
` :
` Defendant. :
`________________________:
`
` ** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL **
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION of NEILL
`HAMILTON LUEBKE, DDS, MS, taken before Ryan K.
`Black, CLR, RPR, Notary Public, in and for
`the District of Columbia, at the offices of
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, 607 14th
`Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, D.C., on
`Wednesday, October 8, 2014, commencing at
`9:01 a.m.
`
`1
`
`23
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`IPR2015-00632 – Ex. 1041
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC, Petitioner
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`Page 199
` A. That's the objective of our fun as an
`endodontist.
` Q. So the answer is yes?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Kuhn discloses subjecting the
`superelastic nickel-titanium file to heat
`treatments at temperatures above 400 degrees
`Celsius, correct?
` MR. DAHLGREN: Objection; form.
`Objection to the extent it calls for a legal
`conclusion.
` THE WITNESS: He does.
`BY MR. GINSBERG:
` Q. Could you look at Figure 4A of the
`Kuhn reference?
` What does this show?
` MR. DAHLGREN: Objection; form.
`Vague.
` THE WITNESS: It's a DSC.
`BY MR. GINSBERG:
` Q. DSC curves of what?
` MR. DAHLGREN: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: A ProFile 04, a ProFile
`600 and a ProFile 700.
`BY MR. GINSBERG:
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-279-9424
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`212-490-3430
`
`IPR2015-00632 – Ex. 1041
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC, Petitioner
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
