`
`
`
`
` Date filed: January 27, 2016
`
`By:
`Joseph A. Hynds, Lead Counsel
`R. Elizabeth Brenner-Leifer, Back-up Counsel
`Steven Lieberman, Back-up Counsel
`Jason M. Nolan, Back-up Counsel
`Derek F. Dahlgren, Back-up Counsel
`C. Nichole Gifford, Back-up Counsel
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`Emails: jhynds@rothwellfigg.com
` ebrenner@rothwellfigg.com
` slieberman@rothwellfigg.com
` jnolan@rothwellfigg.com
` ddahlgren@rothwellfigg.com
` ngifford@rothwellfigg.com
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GOLD STANDARD INSTRUMENTS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner Gold Standard
`
`Instruments, LLC (“Patent Owner”) respectfully submits this Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential, unredacted Deposition Transcript of Neill H. Luebke, D.D.S., M.S.
`
`(“Luebke transcript”), which is being filed concurrently with this Motion as
`
`Exhibit 2046. Patent Owner is also filing a non-confidential, redacted version of
`
`the same transcript as Exhibit 2045. Finally, Patent Owner moves for the entrance
`
`of the Board’s Default Standing Protective Order in this proceeding. Petitioner
`
`does not oppose the motion to seal and agrees to the use of the Board’s Default
`
`Standing Protective Order.
`
`I.
`
`Background
`
`Dr. Neill H. Luebke is the named inventor of U.S. Patent No. 8,727,773 and
`
`President of Gold Standard Instruments, LLC, the Patent Owner and licensor to
`
`Patent Owner’s exclusive licensees and real parties in interest, Dentsply
`
`International Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products d/b/a Tulsa Dental Specialties
`
`(collectively “Dentsply”). On November 4, 2015, Patent Owner submitted a
`
`Declaration of Neill H. Luebke, D.D.S., M.S. (Ex. 2027) in support of its Patent
`
`Owner Response (Paper 44). Petitioner cross-examined Dr. Luebke in a deposition
`
`2
`
`
`
`on December 9, 2015. During the cross-examination deposition, counsel for
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`Petitioner asked questions pertaining to specific amounts actually paid under the
`
`license between Patent Owner and Dentsply, implicating both specific dollar
`
`amounts paid to Patent Owner, as well as the identity of products falling under that
`
`license and the sales volume of those various products. At that time, Patent Owner
`
`designated the transcript confidential. Patent Owner subsequently provided a
`
`redacted version of the Luebke transcript to Petitioner, who does not oppose this
`
`Motion.
`
`II. Patent Owner Asserts That Good Cause Exists For Sealing
`Certain Confidential Information
`
`
`Patent Owner submits that Exhibit 2046 contains Protective Order Material.
`
`Specifically, Patent Owner asserts that the document contains sales, financial and
`
`licensing information that is confidential to Patent Owner and its exclusive
`
`licensees. Such confidential information should not be made available to the
`
`public, including competitors of Dentsply. Accordingly, Patent Owner asks that
`
`Exhibit 2046 be sealed and that only the redacted version, Exhibit 2045, be made
`
`publicly available. Patent Owner certifies that it is not aware of the subject matter
`
`that it seeks to keep confidential having ever been made public and that efforts
`
`have been undertaken by the appropriate parties to maintain the confidentiality of
`
`3
`
`
`
`the subject matter. The narrowly redacted testimony is on only a small number of
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`lines located on pages 18-22 of the transcript (Exhibit 2045).
`
`III. Certification of Conference
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a), Patent Owner hereby certifies that it has
`
`conferred in good faith with Petitioner as to the scope of the protection sought.
`
`Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s filing of this Motion to Seal. Further,
`
`Patent Owner certifies that the parties have agreed to be bound by the terms of the
`
`Default Standing Protective Order attached herewith as Appendix A.
`
`IV. Default Standing Protection Order
`
`The parties agree to the terms of the Default Standing Protective Order
`
`attached herewith as Appendix A. Accordingly, Patent Owner respectfully
`
`requests entry of the Default Standing Protective Order.
`
`V. Conclusion
`
`For the above reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that Exhibit 2046
`
`be placed under seal and that only the redacted version, Exhibit 2045, be made
`
`publicly available. Patent Owner further requests that this proceeding be governed
`
`by the terms of the Default Standing Protective Order.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Joseph A. Hynds /
`By:
`
`Date: January 27, 2016
`Joseph A. Hynds, Reg. No. 34,627
`
`
`
`
`
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST &
`
`
`
`
`
`
` MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Gold Standard Instruments, LLC
`
`5
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GOLD STANDARD INSTRUMENTS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`This Protective Order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals
`
`who have executed the Acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a
`
`consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter
`
`of the proceeding.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-house counsel’s
`
`support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be extended access to
`
`confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or by order of the
`
`Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential
`
`information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`
`the burden of proving that such person should be restricted from access to
`
`confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have a need
`
`for access to the confidential information shall have such access without the
`
`requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives
`
`shall include the Director, members of the Board and their clerical staff, other
`
`support personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`2
`
`
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to sign an
`
`Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and requirements of the
`
`Protective Order by the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient uses to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of information not received from the disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of information received that is designated as confidential; and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable number
`
`of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of the
`
`locations of such copies.
`
`3
`
`
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board under seal,
`
`together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the confidential
`
`information that is under seal and the reasons why the information is confidential
`
`and should not be made available to the public. The submission shall be treated as
`
`confidential and remain under seal, unless, upon motion of a party and after a
`
`hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the information
`
`submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and non-
`
`confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from
`
`the non-confidential version is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. The non-confidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential version of the
`
`submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall remain under
`
`seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte,
`
`4
`
`
`
`the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`for confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Information
`
`designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during discovery or
`
`other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL” and shall be produced in a manner that maintains its
`
`confidentiality.
`
`(C) Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form
`
`may be used to acknowledge this Protective Order and gain access to information
`
`covered by the Protective Order:
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`US ENDODONTICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GOLD STANDARD INSTRUMENTS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
` ___________________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I
`
` I
`
`will abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in
`
`connection with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow
`
`access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this
`
`proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will
`
`inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to
`
`submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the
`
`6
`
`
`
`Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`
`
`Signed ____________________________
`
`7
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 27th day of January 2016, a true and correct
`
`Case IPR2015-00632
`Patent 8,727,773 B2
`
`
`copy of the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL was served, via
`
`electronic mail upon the following counsel for Petitioner US Endodontics, LLC:
`
`
`
`Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Esq.
`Abhishek Bapna, Esq.
`Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
`1133 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036-6710
`Phone: 212-336-2630
`Facsimile: 212-336-1270
`Emails: jginsberg@pbwt.com
`abapna@pbwt.com
`
`
`
`/ Erik van Leeuwen /
`Erik van Leeuwen
`Litigation Operations Coordinator
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.