throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`MAKO SURGICAL CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________
`
`IPR2015-00629
`U.S. Patent No. 6,757,582
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner hereby respectfully requests
`
`oral argument in the present inter partes review proceedings. Patent Owner
`
`specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`• Whether claims 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, 21–30, 34–42, 47, and 50–
`
`58 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Taylor
`
`(Ex. 1008);
`
`• Whether claim 3 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
`
`over Taylor (Ex. 1008) in view of Glassman (Ex. 1009);
`
`• Whether claims 48 and 49 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`as obvious over Taylor (Ex. 1008) in view of Delp (Ex. 1011);
`
`• Whether claim 7 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
`
`over Taylor (Ex. 1008) in view of DiGioia (Ex. 1010);
`
`• Whether claim 11 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
`
`over Taylor (Ex. 1008);
`
`• Whether Patent Owner’s Motion to Exclude should be granted;
`
`• Response to any issues specified by Petitioner in its request for oral
`
`argument;
`
`• Response to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`• Any other issue briefed or presented by the parties throughout this
`
`trial.
`
`Given the significant overlap of issues between IPR2015-00630 and
`
`IPR2015-00629, Patent Owner requests 60 minutes of cumulative argument time
`
`for these proceedings. In particular, Patent Owner proposes that Petitioner present
`
`argument on both IPR2015-00630 and IPR2015-00629, Patent Owner follow with
`
`its response, and that Petitioner use its remaining time for rebuttal.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 9, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Brian M. Buroker/
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125) (lead)
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`Attorney for Patent Owner Blue Belt
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies service pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) of a copy
`
`of this Request for Oral Argument by electronic mail on March 9, 2016 on the
`
`counsel of record of the Petitioner:
`
`Matthew I. Kreeger, mkreeger@mofo.com
`
`Walter Wu, wwu@mofo.com
`
`
`
`DATED: March 9, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Brian M. Buroker/
`
`
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125)
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner Blue Belt
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket