throbber
Statistics for
`Experimenters
`An Introduction to Design,
`Data Analysis,
`and Model Building
`
`GEORGE E. P. BOX
`WlLLIAM G. HUNTER
`J. STUART HUNTER
`
`New York
`
`John Wiley & Sons
`Brisbane
`Chichester
`
`.
`
`(cid:127)
`
`(cid:127) Toronto
`
`SNF Holdiing Company et al v BASF Corporation,
`
`Page 1 of 7
`IPR2015-00600
`
`

`
`Copyright © 1978 by John Wiley & Sons,
`rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada
`All
`
`Inc.
`
`translation of any part of
`Reproduction or
`this work beyond that permilled by Sections
`108 of the 1976 United States Copyright
`107
`or
`Act withoul Lhe permission of the copyright
`for permission
`owner is unlawful
`Requests
`should be addressed to
`information
`further
`or
`the Permissions Department. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
`Box, George EP
`Statistics for experimenters
`
`in probabÌlity and mathematical
`
`(Wiley scrics
`statistics)
`includes index.
`2 Analysis of
`l. Experimentul
`design
`Ilunter, william Gordon,
`variance
`1937-
`I.
`joint author.
`[1. Hunter,
`J. Stuart,
`1923
`joint author.
`III. Title-
`001.4'24
`QA279.B68
`ISBN 0-471-09315-7
`
`77-15087
`
`Printed in
`
`the5 United States of Arnerica
`
`To
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`
`CHAPT-ER 9
`
`Empirical Modeling
`
`Models studied in preceding chapters contained mostly qualitative (or cate-
`also contain quantitative
`gorical) variables. The models we now consider
`Such models can take advantage of
`the in-
`temperature.
`variables,
`such
`as
`herent continuity of quantitative variables.
`
`9.1. MATHEMATICAL MODELS
`
`they are meaningful only in relation to
`Data have no meaning in themselves;
`that
`the phenomenon studied. Suppose,
`a conceptual model of
`instance,
`for
`a clock was observed at midnight on Sunday and thereafter
`12 hours.
`every
`to 6 o'clock. A set of
`the hands were always found to point
`Suppose that
`is shown in Figure 9.la, The interpretation of
`these data
`such observations
`would be different, depending on what model was thought appropriate.
`6 o'clock.
`the clock had stopped at
`that
`One idea that would fit
`the facts
`The appropriate mathematical model is
`then
`
`is
`
`the hour hand, and ße
`the observed value of
`the reading of
`where q
`is
`illustrated in
`to 6, as illustrated in Figure 9.16. A second idea,
`constant equal
`the clock is correctly making one revolution every
`Figure 9.1c.
`that
`12
`is
`6 hours fast. The appropriate model is
`hours but
`(ßo + x).s ;2
`(9.2)
`reading, and (ße + x),,,
`the elapsed time in hours from the first
`where x is
`12. A third idea is
`means the remainder obtained after dividing ße + x by
`p revolutions every
`12 hours, where p
`the clock is making, not one, but
`that
`in which case
`is any integer,
`
`is
`
`a
`
`22
`
`is
`
`=
`
`9
`
`y =
`
`(ße + px), a
`
`i2
`
`(93)
`
`291
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`
`292
`
`EMPIR1CAL MODELING
`
`caia e
`
`modes
`
`-
`
`2 _
`
`data
`
`I
`
`O
`
`i
`
`12
`
`I
`
`24
`
`i
`
`36
`
`noe ihrl
`
`-
`
`-
`
`12
`
`o
`
`.
`
`i
`
`O
`
`2
`
`-
`

`
`12
`
`10
`
`.
`
`clock
`
`stopped
`
`i
`
`12
`
`ilme
`
`090
`
`.
`
`I
`
`24
`
`36
`
`e
`
`i
`
`hours
`
`fast
`
`6
`
`i
`
`:
`
`24
`
`I
`
`2
`
`e
`
`two
`
`if
`
`revolutont every 12 hou,,
`lil
`lil
`/
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`h!ATHEMATICAL MODELS
`models as plausible and othe
`tentative
`regardii
`hypothesis
`experimental design is chosei
`the model should be,
`what
`Accordingly the experimenta
`the ini
`detect
`inadequacies
`of
`is typically
`OŸScientinc work,
`in Chapter
`I; alternative mo
`new candidates
`are scrutinize
`In general, experimenters ;
`ship
`
`I
`
`between the mean value of
`and the levels
`(or versions)
`time, concentration, pressure.
`ship may be written as
`
`o
`
`a
`
`3
`
`12
`
`/
`eme mi
`
`36
`
`0
`
`ame mi
`
`o
`
`2
`
`12
`
`10
`
`a
`
`e
`
`4
`
`2
`
`o
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`0
`
`""
`
`12
`
`ame
`
`a
`
`,
`12
`Ë io
`
`a
`
`e
`
`4
`
`2
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`9
`
`'""""9
`
`"""
`
`24
`
`36
`
`C
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`,,
`
`y
`
`FIGURE 9.I.
`
`Explanations of clock readings
`
`based
`
`on differem models.
`
`as illustrated in Figure 9.ld for p = 2.
`In all
`is assumed that
`the above,
`the
`it
`a regular rate. Of course,
`hands move
`forward at
`the observations would be
`equally consistent with a model
`requiring the hands of
`the clock
`to run
`in Figure 9.le, or
`backward,
`to speed up at one part of
`the cycle
`as
`and to
`slow down at another part, as m Figure 9.tf.
`The possibilities are clearly extensive.
`In practice, however,
`the phenomenon under study (the clock mechanism)
`knowledge of
`available. This prior knowledge
`enables an experimenter to classify
`
`basic
`some
`is usually
`certain
`
`where x refers jointly to the A
`
`Theoretical Models
`
`Sometimes the phenomenon i
`consideratio
`from theoretical
`The required physical
`laws a
`equations, For example,
`sup|
`reactant,
`substance
`the
`B is
`formation od
`Then the rate of
`concentration of unreacted si
`tion of B at
`indicate
`time x is
`shown*
`to be
`
`.
`* Equatton 9.6 results from solving i
`senement
`The rare of
`formation o
`mnce r
`
`as
`
`is assumed thal
`It
`or a
`is p,
`
`I mole of
`
`8
`
`is
`
`Ihri
`
`I
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`
`EMP1RICAL MODELIN(i
`
`Clock
`
`slooPed
`
`I
`
`12
`
`I
`
`24
`
`time »,
`
`36
`
`Two tevnfutient every
`//i//t/li
`
`12
`
`houts
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`tim"
`
`*
`
`ornos
`
`12
`
`ni
`
`24
`
`ame
`
`owi
`
`se
`
`sed
`
`on different models.
`
`.bove,
`
`is assumed that
`the
`it
`, the observations would be
`hands of
`the clock
`to run
`ne part of
`the cycle and to
`
`however,
`some
`clice,
`basic
`lock mechanism) is usually
`rimenter to classify
`certain
`
`MATHEMATICAL MODEl.S
`93
`models as plausible and others as implausible. Based on the experimenter's
`regarding which model or models are plausible, an
`tentative hypothesis
`experimental design is chosen. Even when the investigator thinks he knows
`keep in mind reasonable alternatives.
`the model should be, he must
`what
`Accordingly the experimental design should
`be constructed
`that
`it can
`so
`the initial model. Model building, an important part
`detect
`inadequacies of
`by the iterative process described
`typically accomplished
`Of scientific work,
`is
`1; alternative models are exposed to hazard, and survivors and
`in Chapter
`further.
`new candidates are scrutinized
`In generat experimenters
`are often
`ship
`
`in studying some
`
`relation-
`
`interested
`
`ry = f(xy,xa,
`(9.4)
`xx)
`as yield, quality, or eñiciency,
`response, such
`between the mean value
`of
`uch a
`a number of variables x,, x2,
`and the levels
`(or versions) of
`xx,
`type. For conciseness the relation-
`time, concentration,
`pressure, and c
`alyst
`ship may be wrillen as
`
`...,
`
`a
`
`...,
`
`f(X)
`jointly to the k variables x,, x2...., xx.
`
`Q
`
`-
`
`where x refers
`
`(9.5)
`
`Theoretical Models
`
`Sometimes the phenomenon under study is well understood.and it
`is possible,
`to write down a plausible functional
`from theoretical
`forpi.
`considerations,
`laws are often expressed mosl diicctlÿEy dilferential
`The required physical
`in a chemical reaction substance A is
`equations. For example, suppose that
`the product, and
`kinetics
`apply.
`nrst-order
`substance B
`reactant,
`the
`is
`time is proportional
`Then the rate of formation of B at any instant of
`to the
`concentration of unreacted substance A.
`If the mean value of
`the concentra-
`tion of B at time x is
`indicated by 4,
`the relationship between y and x can be
`shown*
`to be
`
`y =
`
`/I,(l
`
`- e¯'")
`
`(9.6)
`

`
`6
`
`results from selvmg a differential equanon, which capresses mathemattcally the
`" Equation 9
`statemen: -The rate or Ínrmation of
`lo the concentration of unreacted sub-
`B is proportionaÍ
`slance.1"as
`
`It is assumed that 1 mole of Bis formed from i mole of

`6 UI
`
`and that at x =
`
`the concentration
`
`0
`
`.4
`
`dx
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`
`9
`
`2
`
`r; = 2, + ß,x
`= ( + ß2x
`and slopes of
`s and ß s are parameters measuring the intercepts
`where the a
`lines. Equation 9.7 makes no claim to do more than locally
`two straight
`limited region. These two straight
`lines
`approximate the true functions over a
`this purpose. even though the experimenter
`be perfectly adequate for
`is
`may
`be straight
`possibly
`over
`cannot
`quite certain that
`the true relationships
`ranges (see Figure 9.2).
`wider
`incorporated in an empirical
`The degree of complexity that should
`be
`model can seldom be guessed with certainty a priori. One approach
`to
`a fairly general model that can be simplified in a variety of ways
`allow for
`once the experimental results indicate what simplifications are reasonable.
`line functions
`the experimenter might hope that
`the straight
`For example,
`the same time, make a provisiOD
`of Equation 9.7 would be adequate but, at
`fitting quadratic relationships should they prove necessary:
`for
`x2
`+ ß,x + y
`n =
`y = a2 + ßgx + y2x2
`that measure curvature.
`where the y's are parameters
`the temperature range studied,
`it would not be surprising if,over
`In practice,
`simplifications occurred:
`one or more of
`the following
`
`for
`
`for
`
`reactor
`
`reactor
`
`1
`
`2
`
`for
`
`for
`
`reactor
`
`reactor
`
`1
`
`2
`
`(9,7)
`
`is
`
`9
`
`294
`
`EMPIR1CAL MODEL1NG
`
`MATHEMAT[CAL MODELS
`
`is
`
`the rate constant
`the ultimate concentration of B, and ß_
`of
`where ß,
`is
`or mechanistic model
`theoretical
`reaction. This equation is
`called a
`the
`or mechanistic
`is based directly on an appreciation of physical
`because it
`theory governing the system--in this particular case, chemical kinetic theory.
`in Chapter 16.
`Mechanistic modeling is discussed further
`
`Empirical Models
`
`is
`
`Frequently the mechanism underlyinga process is not understood sufficiently
`too complicated, to allow an exact model to be postulated
`from
`well, or
`an empirical model may be useful, particularly
`In such circumstances
`theory.
`limited ranges of
`is desired to approximate the response only over
`the
`if
`it
`reaction is being studied in
`a chemical
`variables. For example, suppose that
`of yield are
`In both reactors measurements
`reactors.
`chemical
`two different
`from 170 to 190°C. Over
`this
`reaction temperatures
`range of
`made over
`relationships between the mean
`range the experimenter guesses
`that
`the
`be approximated by straight
`the yield and temperature x can
`value y of
`lines. Thus the empirical model contemplated is:
`
`a
`
`approxirnaang
`
`'eactor y
`/
`
`'
`
`"'°'
`
`/
`
`/
`
`re,on c
`
`1'O
`
`temper¡
`
`Straighi
`
`lines approxir
`
`FIGURE 91
`two reactors.
`
`line relationships ol
`I. Straight
`quate approximation (i.e.,
`th
`2. To an adequate approximat
`reactors was constant.
`In tf
`curves would be the same
`(þ
`placed from one another on
`illustrated in Figure 9.2.
`3. The two reactors gave identi
`
`this partic
`A good design for
`these various pos
`Lemplation of
`will be to use three levels of
`temç
`ance with the scheme shown in
`This arrangement is
`2 x
`are just sufficient
`contams
`to c
`In addition the design allows e
`by visual
`insp
`sidered, whether
`In practice,
`of course,
`tation.
`several
`times.
`
`3
`
`e
`
`a
`
`i
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`
`is
`
`EMPIRICAL MODELING
`the rate constant
`id ß,
`of
`erical or mechanistic model
`of physical or mechanistic
`kinetic theory.
`:ase.chemical
`lapter
`I 6.
`
`s not understood sufficiently
`iodel
`to be postulated
`from
`:I may be useful, particularly
`limited ranges of
`y over
`the
`reaction is being studied in
`i measurements of yield
`are
`190 C. Over
`m 170 to
`this
`between
`onships
`the mean
`: approximated by straight
`
`etor
`
`1
`
`clor 1
`
`MATHEMATICAL MODELS
`
`295
`
`approxirnating straight
`
`lines
`
`true tunctional
`relationships
`
`i
`
`""'°'
`
`/
`
`y
`
`/
`
`region
`
`of
`
`interesi
`
`:
`
`170
`
`ternperature
`
`PC)
`
`x
`
`100
`
`(9.7)
`
`FlGURE 9.1
`two reactors.
`
`Straight
`
`lines
`
`approximating
`
`relationships
`
`between yield and temperature in
`
`and slopes
`the intercepts
`of
`to do more than locally
`on. These two straight lines
`though the experimenter is
`be straight over
`t possibly
`
`orporated in an empirical
`priori. One approach is
`to
`plified in a variety of ways
`plifications are reasonable,
`the straight
`line functions
`me time, make a provision
`ave necessary:
`
`reactor
`
`reactor
`
`i
`
`2
`
`ure·
`temperaturerangestudied,
`rred:
`
`1. Straight line relationships of
`the form of Equation 9.7 provided
`quate approximation (i.e.,
`the coefficients
`y, and y, were zero)
`2. To an adequate approximation the difference
`between the yields
`the
`of
`the yield-temperature
`reactors was constant.
`case the shape of
`In this
`curves would be the same (ß, = ß2 and y, = 72), but
`they would be dis-
`the situation
`placed from one another on the yield axis (ma ¢ 22). This is
`illustrated in Figure 9.2.
`3. The two reactors gave identical results (2,
`
`= 22, ß, = ß,, and y,
`
`=
`
`72).
`
`an ade-
`
`this particular experimental situation will allow con-
`A good design for
`templation of
`these various possibilities. The most economical arrangernent
`will be to use three levels of tempera lure for each of
`the two reactors in accord-
`ance with the scheme shown in Table 9.L
`This arrangement is
`factorial design-The six sets of conditions it
`to determine the six constants
`in Equation 9.8.
`contains
`are just suflicient
`In addition the design allows each of
`the possible simplifications to be con-
`the results or by numerical compu-
`sidered, whether
`inspection of
`by visual
`In practice, of course, each of
`the six conditions might be replicated
`tation.
`several
`times.
`
`a
`
`2
`

`
`3
`
`Page 7 of 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket