throbber
PRINClPLES
`OF POLYMER
`SYSTEMS
`Second Edition
`
`FERDlNAND RODRIGUEZ
`Professorof Chernical Engineering
`Cornell University
`
`O HEMISPHERE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
`
`Washington New York
`
`London
`
`St. Louis San Francisco Auckland
`McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY
`New York
`London Madrid Mexico Montreal New Delhi Panama
`Bogotá Hamburg Johannesburg
`Tokyo
`Toronto
`Paris São Paulo Singapore Sydney
`
`Page 1 of 7
`SNF Holding Company et al v BASF Corporation, IPR2015-00600
`
`

`
`PRINCIPLESOF POLYMER SYSTEMS
`Second Edition
`
`or
`
`Copyright © 1982, 1970 by Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
`All rights reserved, Printed in the United States of America. No part
`this pubHeation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
`of
`in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
`transmitted,
`the prior written
`recording, or otherwise, without
`photocopying,
`the publisher.
`permission of
`34567890 BCBC 89876543
`in Press Roman
`This book was set
`by Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
`iobro,
`The editors were Julienne V. Brown, Valerie M.
`and Elizabeth Dugger;
`the designer was Sharon Martin DePass;
`the production supervisor was Miriam Gonzalez;
`and the typesetter was Wayne Hutchins.
`Inc., was printer and binder.
`BookCrafters,
`
`2
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
`
`Rodriguez, Ferdinand, date
`Principles of polymer systems.
`chemical engineering series)
`(McCraw-Hill
`Bibliography:
`p.
`Includes indexes.
`and polymerization.
`1. Polymers
`II. Series.
`TP156.P6R62
`
`1982
`
`668.9
`
`L Title.
`
`81-6641
`AACR2
`
`ISBN 0-07-053382-2
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`
`Viscous Flow
`
`167
`
`So for M = 106, a' = 3.56,
`that
`the individual polymer molecules occupy
`is,
`times the volume in cyclohexane than they do in any theta (Flory) solvent.
`four
`in Sec. 2-5 that polymers in contact with solvents of like
`It was mentioned
`i.e., swelling of
`parameter
`ô should show the
`solvation effects,
`greatest
`solubility
`or viscosity of solutions. Now we can
`identify,this solvating ability with
`networks
`the expansion factor
`in Eq. (7-10).
`
`almost
`
`a,
`
`7-4 EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION
`AND MOLECULARWEIGHT
`Equations (7-13),
`(7-14), and (7-15) hold only in dilute solution. Many other equa-
`tions have been proposed to express the variation of viscosity with concentration even
`that of Lyons
`at moderate concentrations. One empirical approach
`and Tobolsky
`is
`(15), who proposed
`
`ki[g]c
`
`=exp
`
`(7-22a)
`
`In the limit of very dilute solutions, ki/(1 -b)
`should be the same as k'
`in the Hug-
`gins equation [Eq. (7-13)]. Under some conditions this one equation can represent
`the
`of a single polymer
`(Newtonian)
`low shear
`from dilute solution
`viscosity
`to the
`[16]. The
`solvent-free melt
`constant
`be positive or negative. The equation
`b
`can
`theoretical
`resembles
`relationship derived
`by Fujita and Kishimoto based on frac-
`a
`tional
`free volume contributions
`[17, 18]. A simpler
`by polymer and solvent
`form,
`in
`which b is zero, was used by Martin some years earlier:
`
`log
`
`= log [p) +K"[p]c
`
`(7-22b)
`
`is
`
`This equation (see Fig. 7-5)
`involves only two
`popular,
`been very
`because
`has
`it
`fitted constants, yet can correlate data to high concentrations.
`It, together with some
`other empirical equations,
`treated more extensively by Ott and Spurlin [19]. As
`is
`one approaches
`the pure molten polymer,
`that
`c > 50,
`the particular solvent used
`is,
`to have little bearing on the viscosity, and n(solution) = n(polymer)u2, where v2
`seems
`the volume fraction of polymer
`[20].
`Combination of Eq.
`(7-16) with (7-13),
`(7-14),
`(7-15),
`(7-22b)
`or
`the
`gives
`effect of molecular wieght
`on y for solutions. For polymer melts several approaches
`are suggested. Log-log plots of 4 versusM often can be resolved into two straight
`lines.
`Typical behavior of melts over
`a large range of molecular weight
`is shown in Fig. 7-7.
`in Fig. 7-7 has a slope of 3.5 ±0.5, and the lower section has
`The upper section
`a
`to I or 2. For each section we can write
`slope closer
`log y = A log M, + B
`
`(7-23)
`
`The break
`thought
`in the curve is
`to represent
`the molecular weight
`at which polymer
`entanglements become
`serious
`to contribute heavily to
`enough
`the viscosity. Single
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`
`168
`
`Principles of Polymer 3 stems
`
`6.0 Pbly
`
`2.0
`
`3.0
`
`rene fractions
`2|y*)
`
`.?'
`
`3.0
`4 0
`* PMMA fractions
`25% by weighi
`in diethyl
`phthalate (60 )
`7°.
`
`4.0
`
`*
`
`.
`
`.
`
`./
`
`(cid:127)
`
`./
`
`f
`
`2.0
`oecomethylene
`adipote
`(109 )
`
`'
`.
`
`-
`
`(cid:127)'
`
`e-caprolactom
`sebacic acid
`(253 )
`
`3.0
`
`-- 2.0
`
`_ g
`4.o
`
`- 2.0
`
`,/
`
`.*'
`
`4.0 -
`
`2.0 -
`
`6.0 -
`
`4.0 -
`
`2.0 -
`
`Polyisobutylene
`(217 )
`
`fractions
`
`Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (25 )
`(y in stokes)
`
`(cid:127)(cid:127)
`
`(cid:127)
`
`-
`
`2.0
`
`3.0
`
`4.0
`log i
`
`2.0
`
`3.0
`
`4 O
`
`FIGURE 7-7
`Logarithmic plots of viscosity
`[20 ]; 1 poise = 0.1 Pa(cid:127)s.
`
`n vs. weight-average number of chain atoms Zw for six polymers
`
`polymer molecules no longer diffuse
`separately, but drag along neighbors. An analogy
`would be the removal of a piece of string
`from a pile of strings. As the average length
`of strings
`the difficulty of removing the string increases. Some values of this
`increases,
`"entanglement molecular weight"
`limited range of
`in Table 7-7. Over
`are given
`molecular weight, another relationship has some usefulness
`[20):
`
`a
`
`log y = A + BM"*
`
`(7.24)
`
`7-5 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE
`flow can be pictured as
`the movement of molecules or seg-
`Viscous
`taking place by
`ments of molecules in jumps from one place in a
`lattice to a vacant hole. The total
`"hole concentration" can
`as space free of polymer,
`"free volume."
`be regarded
`or
`Doolittle proposed (21Jthat
`should vary with the free Vyin the following
`the viscosity
`way:
`
`log y = A +
`
`le
`
`I
`
`(7-25)
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`s
`

`
`Ykcous Flow
`to V- Vo, Vis the specific
`the free volume equal
`where A and B are constants, Vy is
`volume (per unit weight), and Vo is
`the specific volume extrapolated from the melt
`to
`free volume f' = Vy/Vis expected to vary
`OK without change of phase. The fractional
`with temperature as follows:
`f' -fg'=
`a is
`
`a AT
`
`169
`
`(7-26)
`
`where
`
`for melt and glass,
`the difference between
`the expansion coefficients
`AT= T- Tg, andf, is
`free volume at T,. For many polymers a is about
`the fractional
`10¯*
`K-1. Also, Williams, Landel, and Ferry [22]
`found empirically
`that
`-17.44(T-T)
`-l7.44AT
`4 =
`51.6+(T-Tg) SI.6+AT
`
`4.8 X
`
`log
`
`=
`
`)
`
`(7-27)
`
`TABLE 7-7
`Applicability of the Empirical Law log y = 3.4 log Z, + K to Long Polymer
`Chains (20]
`
`Range of applicability
`
`Polymer solvent pair
`
`[Polymer],
`wt fraction
`
`y2Zeat
`break*
`
`Highest
`Z studied
`
`Temperature
`ran8e
`studied, °C
`
`Polymers
`andmol
`wt detm'nÍ
`
`Linear nonpolar polymers
`
`i
`
`Polyisobutylene
`Polyisobutylene-xylene
`Polyisobutylene-decalin
`Polystyrene
`Polystyrene-diethyl
`benzene
`Poly(dimethylsiloxane)
`
`1.0
`0.0Sto0.20
`0.05 to 0.20
`1.0
`0.14 to 0.44
`1.0
`
`610
`~1400
`
`-
`
`730
`~1000
`
`-950
`
`53,000
`140,000
`140,000
`7,300
`22,500
`34,000
`
`-9
`
`to 217
`25
`25
`130 to 217
`30 to 100
`25
`
`f:(n)
`W&f:(n)
`W & f:(n)
`f:(n)
`f:(n)
`W:n, L.S.
`
`Linear polar polymers
`
`(cid:127)
`
`Poly(methylmethacrylate)-
`diethylphthalate
`Decamethylene sebacate
`Decamethylene adipate
`Decamethylene succinate
`Diethylene adipate
`w-Hydroxy undecanoate
`
`0.25
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`
`208
`290
`280
`290
`290
`<326
`
`24,000
`960
`1,320
`990
`1,190
`1,443
`
`60
`80 to 200
`80 to 200
`80 to 200
`0 to 200
`90
`
`Poly(e-caprolactam):
`Linear
`Tetrachain
`Octachain
`
`Effect
`
`of branching
`
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`
`324
`390
`550
`
`2,300
`1,560
`2,000
`
`253
`253
`253
`
`f:(n)
`W:E
`W:E
`W:E
`W:E
`W:E
`
`W:E
`W:E
`W:E
`
`'Ze is
`the lowest chain length for which equation is valid for
`the solution wherein u,
`volume fraction of polymer.
`Íf = fraction,
`W = whole polymer. Chain lengths determined from n = intrinsic viscosity, w =
`osmotic pressure,
`L.S. = light scattering data, E = end group analysis.
`
`the
`
`is
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`
`170
`
`Principles of Polymer Systems
`
`(7-26), and (7-27) if we
`(7-25),
`the viscosity at Tg. We can combine Eqs.
`where og is
`a change, since, unlike Vy, V does
`too great
`Vo in Eq. (7-25) by V. This is not
`replace
`the difference of
`not change rapidly with temperature. First we write Eq. (7-25)
`as
`two conditions to eliminate the constant A.
`
`g
`
`log -
`
`= -
`
`B(f'
`
`-f')
`
`,
`
`(7-28)
`
`p
`
`log --
`
`(7-29)
`
`Equation (7-26) is used to eliminate f':
`(-Ba AT)
`(-B/fj) AT
`= fj(f) + g á T)
`(f |a) + AT
`that f = 51.6a or 0.025. The
`Identification of Eq.
`(7-29) with Eq.
`shows
`(7-27)
`for all materials (polymers and
`transition occurs
`that
`conclusion is drawn
`the glass
`a temperature where the frac-
`compounds) at
`low-molecular-weight
`inorganic glasses,
`free volume is 2.5% of the total, since the empirical
`relationships used have been
`fional
`found to apply for all
`these materials.
`When T-Tg >100°C, Eq.
`(7-27)
`one [201:
`
`does not work as well
`
`the more general
`
`as
`
`log
`
`= B'
`
`exp
`
`-
`
`(7-30)
`
`temperature Ta for molecular weight M and a
`the viscosity at a reference
`where og is
`integer, while B' and ß are fitted constants. Some typical
`results
`are
`usually is
`an
`seen in Fig.7-8.
`the compression of a melt
`to decrease the free volume and
`One would expect
`It can be seen that the viscosity of highly compres-
`consequently increase the viscosity.
`that of the less compressible
`'affected more by pressure
`sible polystyrene
`than
`is
`that polystyrene
`polyethylene (Fig. 7-91It will be remembered (Sec. 7-2, Table 7-2)
`had a higher value of ro /n than polyethylene. Because increasing pressure will
`increase
`it
`to use Eq.
`(7-27) with a pressure-
`temperature,
`transition
`is possible
`the glass
`the form of the dependence (24,
`if one knows
`dependent T, to correlate viscosity
`25]. For several polymers, d(Tg)/dP is reported to be in the range of 0.16 to 0.43°C/
`a value of 03°C/MPa [24].
`It
`for example,
`is harder
`to
`MPa. Polystyrene,
`has
`the temperature and pressure dependence of polymer solutions. Also,
`generalize about
`plots of viscosity vs. concentration
`linear, especially in concen-
`are not
`logarithmic
`trated solutions (Fig.7-10).
`
`7-6 MODELS FOR NON-NEWTONIANFLOW
`is a constant for any polymer with a
`It has been assumed until now that
`the viscosity
`temperature, and pressure. Two more
`given molecular weight, solvent, concentration,
`deformation takes place and the length of time at a
`are the rage at which
`variables
`given rate of shear. For even if we hold the rate of deformation constant,
`the viscosity
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`
`Viscous Flow
`
`171
`
`-
`
`T2
`6.0
`5.0
`i
`I
`Decamethylene
`Ñ,=4,5IO
`
`x 106
`
`7.0
`adipote
`
`e
`
`x 10"
`
`-
`
`72
`
`2.0
`
`i
`
`4.0
`
`:
`
`6.0
`
`I
`
`8.
`
`- 10.0
`
`acetate
`Polyvinyl
`Ñ,=170,000
`
`-8.0
`
`-6.0
`
`4.0
`
`- 2.0
`
`n-poroffins
`
`odipote
`Diethylene
`Ma = 900
`
`1.5·
`
`1.0-
`
`0.5
`

`L
`
`OC
`
`8.0
`
`12.0
`Tl "
`
`-
`
`16.0
`
`x 10
`
`20.0
`
`14.0
`
`18.0
`
`6.0
`
`10.0
`-Ex 10
`T
`
`"
`
`-
`
`FIGURE 7-8
`[20].
`(7-30)
`Viscosity-temperature
`curves according to Eq.
`or decrease with time. If the effect is temporary and viscosity goes back
`may increase
`long enough with no deforming
`(after the system has
`to its original
`relaxed
`value
`increases with time of
`(viscosity
`rheopery
`the behavior
`imposed), we call
`forces
`(Fig. 7-11).
`thixotropy (viscosity decreases with time of deformation)
`deformation)
`or
`structures
`is partially due to intermolecular
`this behavior when viscosity
`One expects
`Ionic polymers in water
`tend to
`that take some time to be established or destroyed.
`relaxed but disperse
`thixotropic, because the polymers probably aggregate when
`be
`individually when sheared.
`and act
`The variation of viscosity with rate of deformation can be shown by a combina-
`7, 9, or 4, since p can be defined as a variable by Eq. (7-3).
`tion of any two variables
`(viscosity increases with i or r) or pseudoplastic (viscosity
`Behavior can be dilatant
`decreases with i or 7) (Fig. 7-12). Most examples of dilatant behavior are particulate
`In slurries and con-
`latexes, slurries, and concentrated suspensions.
`dispersion such as
`there may be almost no flow, 9 = 0, until 7 reaches some "yield
`centrated suspensions
`this "Bingham plastic" behavior.
`(Fig. 7-12). Ordinary toothpaste approaches
`value"
`The typical behavior of polymer
`solutions and melts is pseudoplastic. The de-
`to express the behavior of all such materials
`velopment of a single mathematical model
`has not been successful. One of the simplest approaches
`[26]
`to approximate sec-
`is
`tions of log 7-log i plots by straight
`lines-the "power-law" model (Fig. 7-12):
`7 = Kj"
`
`(7-31)
`
`Page 7 of 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket