throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` WESTERN DIVISION
`
` CASE NO. 2:14-CV-00486-SJO-(PJWx)
`
`BLACK HILLS MEDIA, INC., )
` )
` Plaintiff )
` )
`VS. )
` )
`SONOS, INC., )
` )
` Defendant )
`--------------------------------
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
`
` IVAN ZATKOVICH
`
` Boston, Massachussets
`
` Tuesday, December 9, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REPORTED BY:
`
`Sandra A. Deschaine, CSR, RPR, CLR, CRA
`
`Job No. 12950
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` DECEMBER 9, 2014
`
` 9:20 A.M.
`
` Deposition of Ivan Zatkovich, taken
`
`on behalf of the Defendant, at the law
`
`offices of Hayes Messina Gilman Hayes LLC,
`
`200 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts, on
`
`Tuesday, December 9, 2014, before Sandra A
`
`Deschaine, Certified Shorthand Reporter,
`
`Registered Professional Reporter, Certified
`
`Live Note Reporter, and Notary Public for the
`
`State of Massachusetts.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF:
`
`HAYES MESSINA GILMAN HAYES LLC
`
` JAMES IACONIS, ESQ.
`
` 200 State Street, 6th Floor
`
` Boston, Massachusetts 02109
`
` T. 617.439.4200 F. 617.443.1999
`
` jiaconis@hayesmessina.com
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:
`
`McCONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`
` SEAN M. SULLIVAN, ESQ.
`
` RORY P. SHEA, ESQ.
`
` 300 South Wacker Drive
`
` Chicago, Illinois 60606
`
` T. 312.913.0001 F. 312.912.0002
`
` sullivan@mbhb.com
`
` shea@mbhb.com
`
`(Appearances continued)
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`APPEARANCES (continued)
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:
`
`SONOS, INC.
`
` PAUL A. KADAFAR, ESQ.
`
` In-house counsel
`
` 223 E De La Guerra
`
` Santa Barbara, California 93101
`
` T. 805.308.8234
`
` paul.kadafar@sonos.com
`
`Also Present: Leonard Laub
`
` Sean Budd, Videographer
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` I N D E X
`
`---------------------------------------------
`WITNESSES: PAGE
`--------------------------------------------
`
`Ivan Zatkovich 7
`
` By Mr. Sullivan
`
`---------------------------------------------
`EXHIBITS: DESCRIPTION PAGE
`---------------------------------------------
`
`ZATKOVICH EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1 Rebuttal Expert Report of
` Ivan Zatkovich 10
`
`Exhbiit 2 Expert Report of Andrew
` Wolfe 31
`
`Exhibit 3 Table of Contents 32
`
`Exhibit 4 Wheeler Patent No. '283 34
`
`Exhibit 5 Goldberg Patent No. '740 35
`
`Exhibit 6 Chang Patent No. '517 35
`
`Exhibit 7 Chang Patent No. '739 35
`
`Exhibit 8 McAulay Patent No '910 59
`
`Exhibit 9 Lipscomb Patent No.
` 2002/0026411 78
`
`Exhibit 10 Central District of
` California, Civil Minutes -
` General 106
`
`Exhibit 11 Edens Patent No. '537 157
`
`Exhibit 12 Kowalski Patent No. '410 186
`
`Exhibit 13 Microsoft Dictionary,
` Fifth Edition 204
`
`Exhibit 14 Thomas Patent No. '773 244
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the
`
`record. This is the video operator
`
`speaking Shawn Budd, with TransPerfect
`
`Legal Solutions. Today's date is
`
`December 9, 2014. And the time is 9:20
`
`a.m. We are here in Boston,
`
`Massachusetts, to take the video
`
`deposition of Ivan Zatkovich in the
`
`matter of Black Hills Media versus
`
`Sonos, Inc.
`
` Would counsel please introduce
`
`themselves?
`
` MR. SULLIVAN: Sean Sullivan from
`
`McDonnell, Boehenen, Hulbert & Berghoff
`
`on behalf of Sonos.
`
` MR. SHEA: Rory Shea from
`
`McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff
`
`also on behalf of Sonos.
`
` MR. KAFADAR: Paul Kafadar,
`
`in-house for Sonos.
`
` MR. IACONIS: James Iaconis
`
`representing Black Hills Media. Also
`
`with me is Leonard Laub.
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: And the court
`
`reporter is Sandy Deschaine.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Would you please swear in the
`
` witness?
`
` IVAN ZATKOVICH, Deponent, having
`
`first been satisfactorily identified by the
`
`production of his Florida driver's license
`
`and duly sworn by the Notary Public, was
`
`examined and testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. Good morning. Is it Zatkovich?
`
`Am I pronouncing that right?
`
` A. Zatkovich, yeah.
`
` Q. Are you currently employed?
`
` A. I am.
`
` Q. By who?
`
` A. eComp Consultants.
`
` Q. How long have you worked at eComp
`
`Consultants?
`
` A. Approximately ten years.
`
` Q. Where did you work before that?
`
` A. Prior to that I worked at Smith &
`
`Nephew.
`
` Q. And what kind of business is Smith
`
`& Nephew?
`
` A. Smith & Nephew is in medical
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`supplies.
`
` Q. Did you say it was eComp?
`
` A. eComp.
`
` Q. And what kind of consulting does
`
`eComp do?
`
` A. eComp does technology consulting
`
`project management for software integration,
`
`as well as doing some litigation support.
`
` Q. How big is eComp?
`
` A. eComp? Five employees and about a
`
`dozen consultants.
`
` Q. What position do you hold there?
`
` A. I'm the principal consultant.
`
` Q. I take it there's only one
`
`principal consultant?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. Have you given any testimony
`
`before at trial in a deposition?
`
` A. I have.
`
` Q. How many times?
`
` A. Approximately 18 or 20 depositions
`
`and five or six trials.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` So you probably know the ground
`
`rules for the deposition so I won't go
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 8
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`through those in any detail today.
`
` Is there anything preventing you
`
`from giving complete and accurate testimony
`
`today?
`
` A. No. Just getting over a cold so
`
`I'm a little congested, but aside from that,
`
`I see no reason why not.
`
` Q. If you need a break at anytime
`
`today, just let me know. Okay?
`
` A. Okay.
`
` Q. Have you discussed this lawsuit
`
`with anyone other than Black Hills Media's
`
`lawyers?
`
` A. Yes. I've had two or three
`
`consultants that I work with on this case.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` Who are they?
`
` A. Leonard Laub, Nick Zatkovich, and
`
`Marvin Scaff.
`
` Q. And Leonard Laub is the gentleman
`
`sitting in this room?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. And who did the other consultants
`
`work for?
`
` A. They all work through eComp
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 9
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Consultants.
`
` Q. Is Nick your son?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Did you talk with anyone else?
`
` A. Not that I recall, no.
`
` MR. SULLIVAN: Okay. I'm going to
`
` mark...
`
` THE REPORTER: You're going to do
`
` it?
`
` MR. SULLIVAN: Yeah, I'll do it.
`
` Oh, you like to do it? I'm not use to
`
` such fancy service but.
`
`(Zatkovich Exhibit 1, Rebuttal Expert Report
`
` of Ivan Zatkovich, marked for
`
` identification.)
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` I'm showing you what I've now
`
`marked as Deposition Exhibit 1. Ask you to
`
`look at that, please.
`
` MR. SULLIVAN: I only brought one
`
` copy for you.
`
` MR. IACONIS: That's fine.
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. Take your time and look through
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 10
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`that. But my question for you is going to be
`
`if to you know what that is?
`
`(Witness reviewing document.)
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Can you tell me what it is?
`
` A. It is the report that I prepared
`
`in rebuttal to the Wolfe Invalidity Report.
`
` MR. SULLIVAN: W-o-l-f-e.
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. So that's your Rebuttal Report for
`
`this litigation; correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Let's take a look -- do you see a
`
`couple tabs there at the end of that Exhibit
`
`1?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Can you tell me what Exhibit 1 is?
`
`Or the Tab 1 to Exhibit 1 is?
`
` A. Tab 1 is my CV and a list of cases
`
`where I testified in the last five years, I
`
`believe.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` Is this CV accurate and up to
`
`date?
`
` A. Yes, I'd say so.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 11
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Is there anything you're aware of
`
`that's missing on this CV?
`
` A. No, I don't believe so.
`
` Q. If you would turn to the list of
`
`cases in your CV.
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. First of all, it says, "Sample
`
`Cases."
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. Oh, in my CV.
`
` Q. Yeah. I'm sorry. It's in your
`
`CV.
`
` A. Yes, I see that.
`
` Q. What did you mean by "Sample
`
`Cases"?
`
` A. Just a cross section of cases that
`
`I've worked on.
`
` Q. Are there other cases that you've
`
`worked on recently that aren't listed here?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Do you have a complete list of
`
`cases that you've worked on in the last,
`
`let's say, four years?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Where would that be?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 12
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. That would be at the end of my CV.
`
` Q. Is this a complete list for the
`
`last five years?
`
` A. Yes, I believe so.
`
` Q. So just looking at the sample
`
`cases.
`
` Zomora Radio Case. Do you see
`
`that?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. It seems to indicate here that
`
`this case involved a broadcast or
`
`broadcasting; is that right?
`
` A. Yes, Internet broadcasting.
`
` Q. Did you provided a definition of
`
`broadcast in that case?
`
` A. I don't recall.
`
` Q. Did you issue a report, an expert
`
`report in that case?
`
` A. I did.
`
` Q. Were you deposed in that case?
`
` A. I was.
`
` Q. How about trial testimony, did you
`
`give any in that case?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. And the next case down is Vtran
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 13
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Media Case.
`
` Do you see that?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. It looks like the term "channel"
`
`is mentioned there as one of the issues
`
`involved in that case?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Did you provide a definition of
`
`"channel" in that case?
`
` A. I don't recall.
`
` Q. How about any reports or testimony
`
`for that case, did you have any?
`
` A. I was only the consulting expert
`
`on that case.
`
` Q. So no reports, no testimony?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Then how about the eBay (Skype)
`
`case? Do those cases involve network address
`
`resolution and data routing?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. What is network address
`
`resolution?
`
` A. The ability to identify the
`
`location of a URL, and URI, or an IP address
`
`based on a link provided within a web page.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 14
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` What's a URL?
`
` A. A URL is Universal Resource
`
`Locator. It's also known as a web address.
`
` Q. And how about a URI?
`
` A. A URI is a more broad type of web
`
`address. It complied to documents, pages,
`
`resources. It looks similar to a URL.
`
` Q. What does URI stand for?
`
` A. Universal Resource Identifier, I
`
`believe.
`
` Q. Did any of the cases that you
`
`worked on, as far as you can recall, involve
`
`ad-hoc networking?
`
` A. I do recall -- actually, it's one
`
`that I just completed the report for. Here
`
`it is. Certus versus S&N. We had some mesh
`
`networks involved in that technology.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` Is that listed in your testimonial
`
`history here, or is it in the "Sample Cases"?
`
`I'm just having a trouble finding it.
`
` A. It's in the testimonial of
`
`history.
`
` Q. Whereabouts?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 15
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. The last page, third from the
`
`bottom.
`
` Q. Have you been deposed in that
`
`case?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. I think you said you did issue a
`
`report in that case?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Did you define the term "ad-hoc
`
`networking" in that case?
`
` A. No, I don't recall. It was a
`
`secondary technology.
`
` Q. What was the primary technology?
`
` A. Geolocation and being able to
`
`identify underground facilities.
`
` Q. And how was ad-hoc networking
`
`related to that?
`
` A. Primarily, it was a means for the
`
`geolocation and location devices to
`
`intercommunicate. Mesh network was one of
`
`the methods that could perform that.
`
` Q. Was there a particular protocol
`
`they used to communicate with each other?
`
` A. 802.11 was the base protocol that
`
`was used.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 16
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Do you have any expertise with
`
`Bluetooth?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. What expertise?
`
` A. I've had the opportunity to work
`
`several different projects involving
`
`device-to-device connectivity, involving both
`
`ad-hoc networks and Bluetooth communication.
`
` Q. Is Bluetooth and ad-hoc networking
`
`technology?
`
` A. Bluetooth in certain
`
`circumstances, can be used to develop an
`
`ad-hoc network but in very specific
`
`situations.
`
` Q. What are those situations?
`
` A. Well, wireless ad-hoc network must
`
`be both peer-to-peer connectivity, as well as
`
`each node participating in the routing.
`
`Bluetooth, by default is a point-to-point
`
`device communication. You can also establish
`
`what's called a piconet, p-i-c-o-n-e-t, that
`
`is a master slave, that's not a true wireless
`
`ad-hoc network. But in some circumstances
`
`you can use Bluetooth to create a
`
`peer-to-peer network where both nodes can
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 17
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`participate in the communication.
`
` Q. Don't both nodes in a peer-to-peer
`
`Bluetooth connection always participate?
`
` A. Bluetooth, by default, is not a
`
`peer-to-peer network.
`
` Q. Why is that?
`
` A. Because it's set up as
`
`point-to-point, by default, connecting two
`
`devices, and, in some rare circumstances, you
`
`can expand it in a piconet and even more rare
`
`circumstances you can develop it as a
`
`peer-to-peer.
`
` Q. Okay.
`
` What's the difference between
`
`peer-to-peer and point-to-point?
`
` A. Point-to-point is just too
`
`modes -- two specific destinations. Peer to
`
`peer is when two nodes want to establish a
`
`channel of connectivity. That could be a
`
`point-to-point as well, but peer-to-peer
`
`network is generally a multipoint
`
`connectivity.
`
` Q. Have you heard the term
`
`point-to-multi-point?
`
` A. Not specifically, no.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 18
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. So that's mentioned in the
`
`BlueTooth specification; you agree?
`
` A. There's one of many noticed. I
`
`don't recall the actual term
`
`point-to-multi-point. There's a master
`
`slave, which I believe you're referring to.
`
` Q. Master slave would be
`
`point-to-point; right?
`
` A. Master slave can be point-to-point
`
`or one to many. One master to many slaves.
`
`That, for example, would not be a wireless
`
`ad-hoc network.
`
` Q. But a point-to-point BlueTooth
`
`connection would be an ad-hoc network;
`
`correct?
`
` A. Some people call it a BlueTooth
`
`ad-hoc network. It would not be what's
`
`considered in the industry a wireless ad-hoc
`
`network.
`
` Q. There's a difference between a
`
`wireless ad-hoc network and BlueTooth ad-hoc
`
`network?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Is BlueTooth a wireless
`
`technology?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 19
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. So what's the difference, in your
`
`opinion, between a BlueTooth ad-hoc network
`
`and a BlueTooth wireless?
`
` A. Well, as I mentioned before, in
`
`the industry, the wireless ad-hoc network
`
`peer-to-peer connectivity with each node
`
`participating in the route. That's not
`
`possible with a BlueTooth master slave or
`
`point-to-point network.
`
` Q. Again, I guess I'm having trouble
`
`understanding your difference between
`
`peer-to-peer and point-to-point.
`
` When you only have two devices, is
`
`that a point-to-point connection?
`
` MR. IACONIS: Objection as to
`
` form.
`
` THE WITNESS: A point-to-point by
`
` definition is two and only two
`
` connections. Peer-to-peer could be two,
`
` three, four, five.
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. But would it not be true that when
`
`there's only on two devices connecting to
`
`each other, that that point-to-point
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 20
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`connection is also a peer-to-peer connection?
`
` A. It's possible, but, again, in the
`
`industry, peer-to-peer means you establish a
`
`set of connectivity rules such that multiple
`
`entities can participate.
`
` Q. Multiple entities can participate
`
`in BlueTooth; correct?
`
` A. By default, it would be master
`
`slave.
`
` Q. But those roles can be exchanged
`
`freely in BlueTooth; correct?
`
` MR. IACONIS: Object to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I don't believe
`
` that's true.
`
`BY MR. SULLIVAN:
`
` Q. You don't believe in BlueTooth
`
`that the master slave roles can be exchanged?
`
` A. Not dynamically.
`
` Q. So you said there was a couple
`
`projections you worked on where BlueTooth was
`
`involved?
`
` A. BlueTooth and mesh networks, yes.
`
` Q. Do you know how long ago that was?
`
` A. One project was approximately a
`
`year-and-a-half ago and the other project was
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 21
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`probably six or seven years ago.
`
` Q. And were there any other projects
`
`that you've worked on where BlueTooth was
`
`involved?
`
` A. Well, projects where BlueTooth
`
`devices were used, but I wasn't designing or
`
`developing any BlueTooth protocols.
`
` Q. Have you ever designed or
`
`developed a BlueTooth protocol?
`
` A. Yes, in the projects that I
`
`discussed.
`
` Q. Were those projects that involved
`
`BlueTooth, were they litigation in nature?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Are they identified in your CV?
`
` A. They might be. Well, one was done
`
`as part of utility consulting for eComp, and
`
`the other one was done as part of a Darwin
`
`project that I did for a client. They would
`
`be done both at eComp. I don't know if those
`
`projects were listed specifically.
`
` Q. Well, you have your CV in front of
`
`you.
`
` Do you recognize those projects as
`
`being identified?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 22
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. No, we just have general
`
`categories of consulting. I don't list the
`
`specific clients or projects.
`
` Q. What category of consulting the
`
`BlueTooth technology fall under?
`
` A. Patent litigation consulting for
`
`telecommunications and Internet technology
`
`patents.
`
` Q. But this work you did for
`
`BlueTooth technology, you said wasn't related
`
`to litigation?
`
` A. It was related to patents but not
`
`litigation.
`
` Q. Do you consider yourself an expert
`
`in BlueTooth technology?
`
` A. I consider myself knowledgeable in
`
`BlueTooth technology.
`
` Q. But not an expert?
`
` A. I consider myself knowledgeable.
`
`I don't know what level of expertise you
`
`would be looking for in that, but I
`
`understand the protocol, and I can compare it
`
`to other protocols.
`
` Q. You don't understand the term
`
`"expert"?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 23
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. Well, I mean, with your
`
`understanding of the term "expert," do you
`
`consider yourself an expert in BlueTooth
`
`technology?
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. And that expertise is based on
`
`these two projects?
`
` A. These two projects and the study
`
`of various communication protocols.
`
` Q. Have you studied BlueTooth?
`
` A. Sure.
`
` Q. Have you read the specification?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. In its entirety?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. When was the last time you did
`
`that?
`
` A. Oh, probably -- probably the last
`
`time I read the spec in its entirety was
`
`about six years ago when I worked on the
`
`first project.
`
` Q. When is the last time you read any
`
`portion of the BlueTooth specification?
`
` A. Probably yesterday.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`depo@transperfect.com -- 212.400.8845
`
`SONOS 1015 - Page 24
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. What is your compensation for the
`
`work you're doing in this case?
`
` A. I'm sure I listed it. I believe
`
`it's $475 an hour.
`
` Q. Is that your usual and customary
`
`rate?

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket