throbber
Case 1:14-cv-00850-RGA Document 40 Filed 07/22/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 540
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`










`
`Civil Action No. 14-850-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL
`
`Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“IDT”) and Defendant General Motors
`
`LLC (“GM”), hereby agree, subject to the approval of the Court, to:
`
`1) the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Count 7 of the Amended Complaint (D.I. 11 at
`
`13-14) concerning U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956 (“the ’956 Patent”), and any prayers for
`
`relief predicated thereon, but only to the extent that they are based on products provided
`
`by Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. or its Affiliates (collectively “Koito”) or by Stanley
`
`Electric Co., Ltd. or its Affiliates (collectively “Stanley”); and
`
`2) the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of that portion of GM’s First and Second
`
`Counterclaims (D.I. 12 at 16-17) concerning the ’956 Patent, and any prayers for relief
`
`predicated thereon, but only to the extent that they are based on products provided by
`
`Koito or Stanley.
`
`This voluntary dismissal shall not be construed as a dismissal of Count 7, or any prayers for
`
`relief predicated thereon, with respect to products not provided by Koito or Stanley, or of that
`
`portion of GM’s First and Second Counterclaims concerning the ’956 Patent, or any prayers for
`
`relief predicated thereon, with respect to products not provided by Koito or Stanley.
`
`As grounds, the parties state that the components provided by Koito and Stanley and utilized
`
`Petitioners Koito et al. - Exhibit 1013 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-00850-RGA Document 40 Filed 07/22/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 541
`
`by GM that are accused of infringing the ’956 Patent have become subject to a license. As to the
`
`scope of IDT’s Amended Complaint and GM’s Counterclaims hereby dismissed, all parties shall
`
`bear their own fees and costs.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ryan P. Newell
`Arthur G. Connolly III
`Ryan P. Newell
`Mary I. Akhimien
`Connolly Gallagher LLP
`The Brandywine Building
`1000 West Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`aconnolly@connollygallagher.com
`mewell@connollygallagher.com
`makhimien@connollygallagher.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant General Motors
`Company
`
`Dated: July 22, 2015
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`919 North Market St., 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Innovative Display Technologies LLC
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of ________________________, 2015.
`
`______________________________________
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`
`
`
`2 
`
`Petitioners Koito et al. - Exhibit 1013 - Page 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket