`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00201-JRG-RSP
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00202-JRG-RSP
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY et al.
` Defendants.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`v.
`
`
`NISSAN MOTOR CO. LTD. et al.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“IDT”) and Defendants Nissan Motor
`
`Co., LTD. and Nissan North America, Inc. (collectively “Nissan”) have filed a joint motion to
`
`dismiss. The Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. For Member Case
`
`2:14-cv-202-JRG-RSP, It is hereby ORDERED as follows:
`
`1. The claims for patent infringement brought by IDT against Nissan are dismissed
`
`WITH PREJUDICE.
`
`2. The counterclaims and defenses brought by Nissan against IDT are dismissed WITH
`
`PREJUDICE.
`
`Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action only,
`
`with respect to all claims solely between them. This Order has no bearing on Nissan’s third
`
`Petitioners Koito et al. - Exhibit 1011 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-00202-JRG Document 19 Filed 07/24/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 91
`
`party complaint against Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. and Stanley Electric U.S. Co., Inc.
`
`(collectively “Stanley”).
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Petitioners Koito et al. - Exhibit 1011 - Page 2