throbber

`
`ION Exhibit 1019
`WesternGeco’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
`for Summary Judgment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 5
`
` pages
`Pages numbered 1-5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Ex. PGS 1019
`(EXCERPTED)
`
`
`
`Protective Order Material – Subject to Protective Order
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`HOUSTON DIVISION
`
`
`WESTERNGECO L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintifl,
`
`v.
`
`ION GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION,
`FUGRO—GEOTEAM, INC., FUGRO-GEOTEAM AS,
`FUGRO NORWAY MARINE SERVICES AS,
`FUGRO, INC., FUGRO (USA), INC.
`and FUGRO GEOSERVICES, INC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`‘vvvvvvx/x/vv‘Vxe/x/‘v
`
`Civil Action No. 4:09-CV-01827
`
`Judge Keith P. Ellison
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`WESTERNGECO’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE BITTLESTON PATENTS
`
`Lee L. Kaplan
`lkaplan@skv.com
`SMYSER KAPLAN
`& VESELKA, L.L.P.
`Bank of America Center
`
`700 Louisiana, Suite 2300
`Houston, TX 77002
`Tel:
`(713) 221-2323
`Fax: (713) 221-2320
`
`Attorneys for PlaintifflCounterclaim Defendant
`WesternGeca L. L. C.
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C.
`gregg.locascio@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`
`655 Fifteenth Street, NW.
`Washington, DC. 20005—5793
`Tel.: (202) 879-5000
`Fax: (202) 879—5200
`
`Timothy K. Gilman
`timothy. gilman@kirkland.com
`Ryan Kane
`ryan.kane@kirl<land.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, New York 10022
`Tel.: (212) 446-4800
`Fax: (212) 446—4900
`
`Dated: April 20, 2012
`
`ACCESS RESTRICTED — ATTORNEYS ONLY — USDC SDTX
`
`
`Ex. PGS 1019Ex. PGS 1019
`Ex. PGS 1019
`WG-PGSOOOQO414
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`The ‘difi‘eremiated bird’ can be applied bmh as men-rotating" or ”rotating rel 91th
`to the streamer. In the following, the ‘nonvmtafi n3 altematlve' will be discussed.
`
`(Ex. 8 at WG23898, WG23 899, WG23911, WG23922)
`
`Other varieties of birds, including one, two, three, and four—wing birds as well as “freely rotating
`
`birds” and “non rotating birds” are discussed throughout Dr. Bittleston’s 1995 “Nessie-4 Birds
`
`Feasibility Study.” (Ex. 9 at WG1347—1349) Dr. Bittleston had built and tested such birds by
`
`February 1995.
`
`(Ex. 53 at W61168)
`
`Much of Dr. Bittleston’s work on these lateral control devices can be seen in his PCT
`
`Patent Application WO 98/28636 (“the ’636 Application”) which claims priority to a British
`
`patent application filed in 1996.
`
`(Ex. 10, ’636 Application) This Bittleston application teaches
`
`lateral control devices as well as exemplary control system for those birds:
`
`.
`Fig 1
`
`.
`
`Fig.2.
`
`SENSOR
`
`
`DEPTH
`CCNTHOL
`GIHGUT
`
`
`30
`
`/
`
`32
`.......A
`
`.F 26
`
`STARBOARD
`4 WING2‘
`
`
`
`
`POWER PROVIDED
`ALONG STREAMER
`28
`“4..”
`
`12
`' MQAELATERMW
`
`Posmo“
`
`
`QUICK RELEASE
`“were?“
`ATTACH MENT
`POSITION
`
`(Ex. 10, ’636 Application at Figs. 1, 2)
`
`In addition to designing these streamer positioning devices, Dr. Bittleston also worked
`
`with Oyvind I‘Iillesund, another Geco engineer, on designing control systems for lateral steering.
`
`(Ex. 6, Bittleston 2010 Dep. Tr. at 150:7—13, 158:7—12) These inventions are reflected, for
`
`example, in Dr. Bittleston’s 1993 paper, which discloses the combination of local controllers on
`
`ACCESS RESTRICTED — ATTORNEYS ONLY — USDC SDTX
`
`Ex. PGS 1019
`Ex. PGS 1019
`WG-PGSOOOQO422
`
`3
`
`

`

`The specification also teaches additional aspects of streamer positioning devices that
`
`might be useful with specific types of streamer positioning devices, such as an inline two-winged
`
`bird. For example, streamer twisting—and ways to avoid twisting—are discussed in the ’017
`
`Patent’s specification.3
`
`(See, e.g., Ex. 15, ’017 Patent at 725—8255) The specification also
`
`explains that the wings can change orientation using electric motors, hydraulic actuators, or a
`
`local control system.
`
`(Id. at 5:28—37) The specification also notes that motor drivers can be
`
`connected to and can actuate the wing and provides a diagram of a local control system that
`
`includes such a motor driver, (Id. at 7:41253’ Fig. 4)
`
`2.
`
`The Bittleston Patents Teach Control Systems
`
`The specification of the Bittleston Patents-in-suit also teaches control systems for using
`
`streamer positioning devices to steer streamers laterally.
`
`For example,
`
`the specification
`
`describes how to divide the control system into local and global control systems, with various
`
`apportionments based on the needs of the system.
`
`(Ex. 15, ’017 Patent at 3136—523, 5:54—7:5,
`
`7:28—35, 8:39—10:23, Fig. 4) The specification includes references to WesternGeco US. Patent
`
`4,992,990 and PCT International Publication No. WO 96/21163.4 (Id. at 3:65—42) The 1990 is
`
`a patent titled “Method for Determining the Position of Seismic Streamers in a Reflection
`
`Seismic Measuring System” that
`
`teaches the implementation of a global controller
`
`for
`
`determining the position of seismic streamers.
`
`(EX. 19, 9% Patent at Abstract) Such a system
`
`was given as an example of position prediction software by Dr. Bittleston in his deposition.
`
`(Ex.
`
`6, Bittleston 2010 Dep. Tr. at 155:3—15622)
`
`3 Dr. Bittleston has a separate patent for this anti-twisting function, which also claims priority to
`the ’895 Application, that is not asserted in this matter.
`(EX. 20, US Pat. No. 7,222,579)
`
`4 The patent lists this application as WO 98/21163. This is a typographical error.
`
`ACCESS RESTRICTED — ATTORNEYS ONLY — USDC SDTX
`
`
`Ex. PGS 1019Ex. PGS 1019
`Ex. PGS 1019
`WG—PGS00090426
`
`4
`
`

`

`a.
`a.
`
`T116 Bittlfizsmn Patents Taach Acoustic Positioning Sygmmfi
`
`‘I‘ht‘: Birtlesmn Patenm’ Spaaificafim teachm that knawn ways to fieterminc bird locatian
`
`could be: used such as amustic pagitioning systems or GPS syfitems.
`
`(Ex, 15? ’01? Patmt at
`
`3:65—4zfi; Ex.
`
`I. Triamafyllwu Deal. at ‘J[ 29)
`
`It specifically teaches that “mm? hm‘imntal
`
`pQSititms 0f the: birds 18 can be derived, fur instance, using the types 40f acmustix: pasitioning
`
`symems described in (131113153, Pal. N0. 4,992,990. f
`
`(Ex. 15, ‘017 Patent at 3:65PM) As ShDW
`
`in the “990 Patent
`
` Fig, 2'
`
`ABSTRACT
`{37;
`AWMW w-Wafla EM 1%
`WW {Sh 8133» Imahififinifim
`in; m whmin hydroacomtic distance measure»
`menu an: 3524i which are mama by mans <31” acoustic
`unweiwn pmvidmfi in vmda (1}. 13mm}. 8mm (53.
`Mamie scams; 63) am) in m Mimic smumcu {Sn 5:?
`Anselm when»: mifiom me fielémiimi by pushing
`dewminéug equipmu’al pmvfdez: in 5'!» firms: m0 Inca-
`dam fur fimnm an a vessel (1) :11 : Haas (5}, The
`Mannie Immiwra and flu: maiziflu dmminiu;
`equipmmz farm as
`threadimnnnional simcwm. The
`wank»: demmiinn £31m plum: by imam 31mm ht-
`mean 131: swam: trsnweivm and {has naimimfltm
`of xi ism {we mfww pmitimns m that mare :5 a0
`Mammy cm 9W busing: w egtiaai yismmiy,
`and high madamy is obtained(mm is W
`Malina! fits-W inWfimMQ§
`W W Wu: MM antiwar {Lam k
`
`m 1 at.
`mnpmuurmwmamiwmfl:
`
`(Ex. 19, ‘990 Patent at Fig. 7, Abstract) Defendmztg’ imp-mta Mr, Bram, agreed that the ‘990
`
`Patami—igsuad February 12, IQQJWdisclased and enabled 3m amustic positioning system that
`
`mum be mad with aireamer stealing:
`
`Q; Have yeu reviewer} {hat “990 patient?
`
`A. Yaah, 1113 (3am amusiim pawn,
`
`Q: Does that disclaw and enable an acpusz‘ic positioning system far streamer
`syxtems?
`
`A. That’s the gwwral concept ofit.
`
`(Ex. 16, Emma Dem. Tr. at 204: l 6~22 (objections emittedj)
`
`ACCESS RESTRICTED - ATTORNEYS ONLY - USDC SDTX
`
`
`Ex. PGS 1019Ex. PGS 1019
`EX. PGS 1019
`WG-PG800090427
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket