throbber
'
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:03
`
`3
`@713 939 9508
`
`9
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`_
`
`007
`
`Patent
`Attorney Do ket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFI E
`
`IN RE APPLICATION OF:
`
`Oyvind I-Iillesund
`
`SERIAL NO. 09/787,723
`
`FILED:
`
`July 2, 2001
`
`FOR: Control System for Positioning
`Marine Seismic Streamers
`
`commemwneoaamcmomcoocoo
`
`EXAMINER: Sotelo, Jesus D.
`
`GROUP ART UNIT: 3617
`
`H
`
`Via Facsimile: 703.305.3597
`
`CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION
`37 C.F.R. I.8
`
`Ibereby certify that this correspondenceis being facsimile
`transmitted to the Commissioner for Patents to the fax number
`indicated on the Office Action. to the attention of the named
`
`Examiner. on the date below:
`
`Mail Stop Response '
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`_ Sir:
`
`5'1
`
`RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2003
`
`. Applicantfiles this Response to the Office Action dated February 26, 200?) an . Ii-.
`three month shortened statutoryperiod for response set to expire on May26, 2003. Plea e e torthe
`amendments and consider the remarks on the pages that follow
`
`
`Recelved nom < 713 939 9508 > at 10116I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllghl Time]
`
`floN 1033
`
`ION 1033
`
`

`

`‘
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:04
`
`.
`@713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`5
`.008
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`IN THE CLAIR/IS:
`
`Please amend the claims according tothefollowing replacement claim set.
`N“ _
`
`‘/
`
`25. (Currently Amended) A method of controlling the positions ofmarine seismic streamers in an
`array of such streamers being towed by a seismic survey vessel, the streamers having respective
`streamer positioning devices disposed therealong and each streamer positioning device having a
`wing and a wing motor for changing the orientation of the wing so as to steer the streamer
`positioning device laterally, said method comprising the steps of:
`obtaining a predicted position of the streamer positioning devices;
`obtaining an estimated velocity of the streamer positioning devices;
`for at least some of the streamer positioning devices, calculating desired changes in the
`orientation oftheir wings using said predicted p_osition and said estimated velocity; and
`actuating the wing motors to produce said desired changes in wing orientation.
`
`26. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein said estimated velocityis calculated using a
`vessel speed received from said seismic survey vessel's navigation system.
`
`27. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 26, in which said estimated velocity is a water
`referenced towing velocity that compensates for the speed and heading ofmarine currents acting on
`said streamer positioning devices.
`
`28.(Original)Amethodasclaimedinclaim27, inwhichsaidestimatedvelocityiscompeniatealfor
`relative movement between said seismic survey vessel and said streamer positioning devi as
`i
`I
`'
`'
`29. (Original) A method as claimedin claim 28, in which said step ofcalculating a desinedch
`anj:in
`Wing orientation further uses an estimate of the crosscurrent velocity at the respective sire I er
`
`positioning device.
`
`l l>
`
`Recelvcd I'rom < 713 939 9508 > at 10/16/03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Daylight Time]
`
`-~
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I
`
`

`

`'
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:05
`
`.
`8713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`.009
`
`\
`Xx
`kg
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.. 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`30. (Original) A method as claimedin claim 29, in which said step ofcalculatmg a desired changein
`wing orientation is regulated to prevent the wing fr0m stalling.
`
`31. (Currently Amended) A method as claimed in claim 30, in which said step of calculating a
`desired change in wing orientation is regulated by a global control system located on or near said
`
`seismic survey vessel that may-be is configured into a feather angle mode, wherein said global
`control system attempts to direct the streamer positioning devices to maintain each ofsaid streamers
`
`in a straight line offset from the towing direction of said marine seismic vessel by a certain feather
`angle, and into a turn control mode, wherein said global control system directs said streamer
`positioning devices to generate a force in the opposite direction ofthe a turn at the beginning ofthe
`tum.
`32. (CurrentlyAmended) A method as claimed in claim 31, in which said global control system is
`mayfurther be configured into a streamer separation mode, wherein said global control system
`
`attempts to direct said streamer positioning device to maintain a minimum separation distance
`between adjacent streamers.
`
`.
`
`33. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 32, further including the step ofdisplaying the position
`of said streamer positioning devices on said seismic survey vessel.
`
`34. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 33, in which each streamer positioning device is
`attached to and unable rotate with reSpect to its streamer and further comprising the step of
`monitoring twist in. said marine seismic streamers and calculating a desired change in theorieriiiMon
`01 the wings ofthe streamer positioning devices to reduce said twist.
`
`i
`35. (Original) A method as claimedin claim 34, further including the step ofobtaining estima es of
`the respective current positions of at least some ofsaid streamer positioning devices and the step of
`obtaining the desired positions of each of said at least some streamer positioning devices.
`
`Recelved from < 713 939 9508 > at 1011QI03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllghl Tlme]
`
`

`

`10/16/03
`
`09:05
`
`@713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`5
`.010
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`36. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 35, wherein the estimate of the current position of a
`streamer positioning device and the desired position of that same streamer positioning device-are
`used to produce a desired force to be applied to its streamer by that streamer positioning device.
`
`37. (Original) A method as claimed in claim 36, in which said desired force is projected onto the
`current force axis and the wing orientation is calculated that will produce said projected force at said
`estimated velocity.
`
`38. (Original) A method as claimed1n claim 37, in which the streamer positioning deviceis rotated .
`to align the current force axis with said desired force and its wing orientation is changed as the
`current force axis becomes more closely aligned with said desired force.
`
`3 9. (Currently Amended) Apparatus for controlling the positions ofmarine seismic streamers in an
`array of such streamers being towed by a seismic survey vessel, the streamers having respective
`streamer positioning devices disposed therealong and each streamer positioning device having a
`wing and a Wing motor for changing the horizontal orientation ofthe wing so as to steer the streamer
`positioning device laterally, said apparatus comprising:
`means for obtaining a predicted position ofthe streamer positioning devices;
`4
`means for obtaining an estimated velocity of the streamer positioning devices,
`means for calculating desired changes1n the orientations of the respective wings of at least
`some ofthe streamerpositioning devices usingssaid predicted position and said estimated velocity,
`
`and
`
`means not actuating the wing motors to produce said desired changes in wing 'diienn: or.-
`
`40. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 39, in which each streamerpositioning device has a first
`Wing and a second wing, said fu‘stwing and said secondwingbeing independentlymoveable to steer
`the streamer positioning device laterally and vertically.
`
`Recelved from < 713 939 9508 > at 10116I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllght Tlme]
`
`

`

`.
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:06
`
`.
`8713 939 9508
`
`STREETS &. STEELE
`
`5
`.011
`
`\
`
`\\
`%
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`41. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 40, wherein each streamerpositioning device is rigidly
`attached to and unable to rotate with respect to its streamer.
`
`42. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 41, further including means for determining the angular
`velocity of each streamer posiu'oning device.
`
`43. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 42, wherein a global control system is located on or
`near said seismic vessel and a respective local control system is located within or near each streamer
`positioning device and said global control system and said local control systems communicate using
`\ t
`a respective communication line passing through each streamer.
`
`44. (CurrentlyAmended)Apparatus as claimedinclaim43, in whichprogram-unitsinoutvaluesfor
`saidlocal control systems maybe fl downloaded over said communication lines.
`45.
`(Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 44,
`further including a respective backup
`
`communications channel in each streamer between the global control system and the local control
`systems of the streamer positioning devices of the streamer.
`
`46. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 45, in which each local control system has a cycle rate
`that is at least 10 times greater than the data transfer rate of said communication line.‘
`
`47. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 46, in which each local control system comprises a
`microprocessor programmed to monitor the current orientation of the wing of its streamer
`positioning deviceantl to calculate desired changes to the orientation ofsaid Wing based on. intuit—s
`from salt. global control system.
`
`48. (Original) Apparatus as claimed in claim 47, further including means for producing a weight
`function filtered depth value.
`
`Recelvea from < 713 939 9508 > at 10116I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllght Tlme]
`
`

`

`~
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:07
`
`.
`@713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`F
`I012...”
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`49. (New) The method ofclaim 25, wherein the step ofcalculating desired changes in the orientation
`of at least some of the streamer positioning device’s wings using said predicted position and said
`estimated velocity comprises:
`
`calculating desired horizontal and vertical forces to be imparted by the Streamerpositioning
`devices on marine seismic streamers using said predicted position; and
`calculating desired roll angles and common wing angles for the streamerpositioning devices
`to impart the desired horizontal and vertical forces using said estimated velocity.
`
`50. (New) The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the means for calculating desired changes in the
`orientations ofthe respective Wings ofat least some ofthe streamer positioning devices comprises:
`means for calculating desired horizontal and vertical forces to be imparted by the streamer
`positioning devices on marine seismic streamers using said predicted position; and
`means for calculating desired roll angles and common wing angles for the streamer
`positioning devices to impart the desired horizontal and vertical forces using said estimated velocity.
`
`
`
`Received from < 713 939 9508 > at 10116I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllgl‘lt Tlme]
`
`

`

`.
`
`10/16/03
`
`09:07
`
`‘
`
`@713 939 9508
`
`O
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`I013 .-._
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`REMARKS
`
`Section 112 Objections
`
`Claims 31-48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for
`failing to particularlypoint out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the
`invention. Claims 3 1-32 and 44 have been amended accordingly to replace the terms “may (.. .) be”
`with the terms “is” or “are.” Claim 44 has been further amended to replace the phrase “program
`units” with the phrase “input values” accordingly.
`
`Section 103 Rejection
`
`Claims 25-48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over European
`Patent No. EP 6 13025 Bl (“Elholm”). This rejection is respectfiilly traversed because the Examiner
`has failed to present aprimafacie case of obviousness.
`
`To establish aprimafacie case ofobviousness, three basic criteria must bemet: 1) there must
`be some objective suggestion or motivation, either in the prior art reference(s) or in knowledge
`generally available to one of ordinary skill in the art, to modify to, combine reference teachings; 2)
`there must be a reasonable expectation ofsuccess by the resulting combination or modification; and
`- 3) the combined or modified prior art reference(s) must teach or suggest all the claim limitations.
`The teaching or suggestion to make the claimed combination/modification and the reasonable
`expectation ofsuccess must both be found in the prior art and not based on applicant’s disclosure. In
`re Week, 947 F.2d 488, 20 USPQ 2d 1438 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
`
`Claims 25 and 39 have been amended such that both claims presentlyrecite the step/fiincn'on
`of “obtaining a predicted position of the streamer positioning devices.” Such predicted position
`determination is preferably based upon the behavior ofthe streamers, and can be accomplished more
`rapidly than actual position determination according to prior art methods that are plagued by low
`sample rates and time delays. Applicant’s Specification at page 3, second full paragraph, and the
`
`7
`
`Recelved from < 713 939 9508 > at 10116I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Dayllghl Tlme]
`
`

`

`10/16/03
`
`09:08
`
`.
`
`@713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`.014
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`paragraph that bridges pages 7-8.
`
`Elholm teaches in a very general sense, at column 6, lines 50-56 thereof, the use of sensors
`including “speed transmitters” and “positioning instruments” installed in a streamer positioning
`device so that “the device is able to adjust its course by means ofits own control loops.” Elholm fails
`to disclose or even suggest predicting the position of streamer positioning devices to avoid delays
`inherent in actual position measurements. Nor does Elholm disclose or suggest “calculating desired
`changes in the orientations of the respective wings of at least some of the streamer positioning
`devices using said predicted position and said estimated velocigf’ (emphasis added), as also required
`by claims 25 and 39. There is no disclosure whatsoeverin Elholm ofperforming calculations that use
`either a predicted position or an estimated velocity of a streamer positioning device to produce
`desired changes in wing orientation.
`
`Elholm clearly fails to teach all the limitations of claims 25 and 39, as well as the other
`claims based thereon. Furthermore, there has been no identification of a teaching in the art that
`bridges the above-identified gaps between Elholm and the claimed invention. Accordingly, the
`rejection of claims 25-48 on obviousness grounds is not supportable. Reconsideration and
`Withdrawal of this rejection is respectfiilly requested.
`
`In conclusion, Applicant submits that all remaining claims in the present application are
`entitled to allowance and such action is earnestly solicited.
`
`Received from < 713 939 9508 > at 10/18I03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Daylight Time]
`
`

`

`10/16/03
`
`09:09
`
`@713 939 9508
`
`STREETS & STEELE
`
`r
`.01
`
`5
`
`In the event there are additional charges in connection with the filing of this Response, the
`Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge the Deposit Account No. 50—0714/WEST/0027 ofthe
`firm of the below-signed attorney in the amount of any necessary fee.
`
`Patent
`Attorney Docket No.: 14.0123
`(WEST/0027)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`£2 : 14$; :>
`
`Steven L. Christian
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 38,106
`STREETS & STEELE
`13831 Northwest Freeway, Suite 355
`
`H
`
`Houston, Texas 77040
`(713) 939-9444
`
`llflllllfllllflillllllfilflllfi/lll
`24945
`
`RECEWEQ
`
`onmmnsmoafifim
`
`0 CT E g 2003}
`
`(E ‘
`‘u
`
`'
`
`; A ”
`L
`-‘ L
`
`
`
`Recelved trom < 713 939 9508 > at 10I16l03 9:49:59 AM [Eastern Daylight Tlme]
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket