throbber
Gilman, Timothy K.
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Timothy Gilman <TGilman@kirkland.com>
`Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:03 PM
`james.brasher@pgs.com
`eugene.thigpen@pgs.com
`WesternGeco v. ION, Case No. 4:09-cv-01827-KPE (S.D. Tex.)
`
`
`James,
`
`As I indicated during our conversation this afternoon, we are representing WesternGeco in connection with the above-
`
`captioned patent litigation. For your convenience, attached below are the parties' four pleadings in this case.
`
`Based on our investigation and research to date, it appears that information relevant to the litigation may be in the
`
`possession, custody or control of PGS and/or that current PGS employees may have personal knowledge relevant to the
`litigation. For example, Oyvind Hillesund, a former WesternGeco employee who is believed to currently work for PGS in
`Oslo, is a co-inventor on some of the patents-in-suit. As another example, we understand that PGS was involved in the
`design, testing and/or launch of the ION products and systems accused of infringement in this action in 2007, and would
`likely have information relevant to those products and systems. PGS may have used these systems and products outside
`the United States, which would be relevant to WesternGeco's claim against ION under 35 U.S.C. s. 271(f). PGS may also
`have information relevant to ION's antitrust counterclaims in this case, such as information regarding the identity and
`market shares of companies involved in marine seismic surveys.
`
`I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter with you in greater detail, and to explore the potential for
`
`discovery of relevant material that PGS may possess. For example, we would we interested whether PGS would be
`willing to make Mr. Hillesund available to discuss his work relating to the applicable patents-in-suit, as well as possibly
`sitting for a deposition in this case. Please let me know when would be convenient for you to continue this discussion.
`
` -
`
` tim
`
`D.I. 1 -- Complaint.pdf D.I. 6 -- ION Answer and Counterclaim.pdf D.I. 14 -- WG Answer
`and Counterclaim to ION Counterclaim.pdf D.I. 19 -- ION Answer to WG Counterclaim.pdf
`
`Timothy K. Gilman
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`212-446-4689
`212-446-4900
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022-4675
`timothy.gilman@kirkland.com
`
`Attachments:
`
`D.I. 1 -- Complaint.pdf (4411824 Bytes)
`
`D.I. 6 -- ION Answer and Counterclaim.pdf (3120883 Bytes)
`
`D.I. 14 -- WG Answer and Counterclaim to ION Counterclaim.pdf (3558380 Bytes)
`
`D.I. 19 -- ION Answer to WG Counterclaim.pdf (231538 Bytes)
`
`b282f738-ec7c-4eb2-9bb6-b036409f9383.gif (1637 Bytes)
`
`34eba385-f8f0-4ce1-8931-045a921023bc.gif (1808 Bytes)
`
`958c0455-1580-449d-bc29-0aed8cd5b835.gif (1983 Bytes)
`
`c5705a51-6794-4638-aa17-0b57615305bc.gif (1846 Bytes)
`
`
`1
`
`WesternGeco Ex. 2015, pg. 1
`IPR2015-00565
`ION v WesternGeco
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket