throbber
US Patent and Trademark Office
`_________________________________________
`
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
`and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.,
`v.
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`
`_________________________________________
`
`Deposition of:
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`October 8, 2015
`
`
`Page 1 of 75
`
`JAZZ EXHIBIT 2044
`Amneal Pharms. et al. (Petitioners) v. Jazz Pharms., Inc. (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2015-00554
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 1
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`--------------------------------------------
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
`AND PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`
` Petitioners,
`v.
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2015-00546
`Patent 7,765,106
`--------------------------------------------
`
`DEPOSITION OF
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Volume 1
`October 8, 2015
`Greenwood Village, Colorado
`Lead: Eric Stops, Esquire
`Firm: Quinn Emanuel
`
`FINAL COPY
`JANE ROSE REPORTING 1-800-825-3341
`
`Page 3
`ATTORNEYS FOR THE PATENT OWNER
` Eric Stops, Esquire
` Frank C. Calvosa, Esquire
` QUINN EMANUEL
` 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
` New York, New York 10010
` 212-849-7000
` ericstops@quinnemanuel.com
` frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
` - and -
` John V. Biernacki, Esquire
` JONES DAY
` 901 Lakeside Avenue
` Cleveland, Ohio 44114
` 216-586-3939
` jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`ALSO PRESENT
` David Silverstein, Par Pharmaceutical
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
` 74 Fifth Avenue
` New York, New York 10011
` 1-800-825-3341
` Margie Dauster, Court Reporter
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
`APPEARANCES
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER AMNEAL
` Matthew C. Ruedy, Esquire
` MADDOX EDWARDS, PLLC
` 1900 K Street, NW - Suite 725
` Washington, DC 20006
` 202-830-0779
` mruedy@meiplaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER PAR
`PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., AND THE
`WITNESS
` Aziz Burgy, Esquire
` Bradford C. Frese, Esquire
` ARENT FOX LLP
` 1717 K Street, NW
` Washington, DC 20006-5344
` 202-857-6000
` aziz.burgy@arentfox.com
` bradford.frese@arentfox.com
`
` TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Witness:
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Volume 1
`
`Examination
`By Mr. Stops.............................Page 6
`
`Reporter Certificate.....................Page 218
`
`Notice to Read and Sign..................Page 220
`
`Index of Exhibits........................Page 222
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 2 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 7
` Q. Would you please state your full name for the
`record and your home address.
` A. Yes. My name is Robert James Valuck. Last
`name is spelled V-a-l-u-c-k. My home address is
`7059 South Magnolia Circle, Centennial, Colorado 80112.
` Q. And just a few instructions before we get
`started. I need your answers orally. The court
`reporter cannot record nods of your head. Do you
`understand?
` A. Yes.
` Q. If you don't understand a question, I need you
`to ask for clarification before you answer. If you do
`answer, that means you understood the question. Is that
`okay?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And are you represented by counsel today?
` A. Yes, I am.
` Q. Who is representing you?
` A. Both Mr. Burgy, Mr. Frese, and Mr. Ruedy.
` Q. How many times have you been deposed?
` A. I don't know the exact number.
` Q. Approximately.
` A. Approximately half a dozen times.
` Q. Have you been deposed in any patent cases
`before?
`
`Page 8
`
` A. No, I have not.
` Q. Do you have any patents in your name?
` A. No, I do not.
` Q. You've filed a patent application; correct?
` A. I was associated with the filing of a patent
`application.
` Q. What do you mean by "associated"?
` A. It was filed by another -- another individual.
` Q. You were a named vendor on that application,
`though?
` A. I believe so, yes.
` Q. Okay.
` A. I don't recall the -- the paper. I don't have
`that with me.
` Q. Do you know what that patent application was
`for?
` A. I would have to review that -- that
`application.
` Q. You don't remember the subject matter of the
`application?
` A. Only generally. Again, I don't have the
`application with me, so I don't have the --
` Q. What's your general recollection?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Relevance.
` A. Yeah, I was not asked to opine on it for this
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 5
`
` * * *
` Greenwood Village, Colorado
` 8:58 a.m.
` * * *
`
` MR. STOPS: So this is Eric Stops for Jazz.
`For the record, I guess, do you guys want to introduce
`yourselves first?
` MR. BURGY: Sure. Sure. My name is Aziz
`Burgy, I'm from the law firm of Arent Fox, and I
`represent Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., in this matter and
`also representing the witness here.
` MR. FRESE: My name is Bradford Frese. I'm
`also from the firm of Arent Fox, and I also represent
`Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., in this matter and the
`witness.
` MR. RUEDY: Matt Ruedy representing Amneal, and
`I also represent the witness in this proceeding.
` MR. SILVERSTEIN: David Silverstein, in-house
`counsel at Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
` MR. STOPS: And for the record, also, with me
`for Jazz is Frank Calvosa from Quinn Emanuel and John
`Biernacki from Jones Day.
` And for the record, this deposition is being
`taken regarding Dr. Valuck's declarations in several
`
`Page 6
`IPRs. The numbers are IPR-2015-545, -546, -547, -548,
`-551, and -554.
` This deposition also applies to several IPRs
`that are in the process of being joined. Those numbers
`are 2015-1810, -1813, -1814, -1815, -1816, -1817, -1818,
`and -1820.
` And we've discussed these multiple IPRs being
`addressed simultaneously with counsel for Par and
`Amneal, and they have consented.
` MR. BURGY: That's fine. This is Aziz Burgy.
`And we've also discussed the issue of objections for
`this deposition. I will be making the primary
`objections on behalf of both Par and Amneal. Certainly,
`if I miss an objection and my colleague, Mr. Ruedy,
`wants to interject an objection, he's free to do so. I
`assume you guys have no objections to that, Eric.
` MR. STOPS: Correct.
` MR. BURGY: Great. Thank you.
`ROBERT VALUCK, Phd, RPh,
` having been duly sworn, was examined
` and testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION
`BY MR. STOPS:
` Q. Good morning again, Dr. Valuck.
` A. Good morning.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 3 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 9
`matter, so I don't have any recollection or opinion
`about it at this time.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) It was not about restricted
`distribution systems --
` MR. BURGY: Same --
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) -- is that correct?
` MR. BURGY: I'm sorry. Same objection.
` A. Again, I don't have any opinion on it at this
`time. No recollection.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. Do you know if it's --
`that application is still pending?
` MR. BURGY: Same objection.
` A. I don't know.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. But through your
`experience in the application, are you generally
`familiar with what patents are?
` A. General familiarity with what patents are.
` Q. Okay. Have you read -- have you ever read a
`patent?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Have you ever read a patent before this case?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Now, you understand that this deposition
`concerns declarations that you've submitted in
`connection with six separate IPRs on six patents owned
`
`Page 10
`
`by Jazz; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. For the purpose of the -- of this deposition,
`I'm going to refer to the patents by their last three
`numbers. So, for example, for Patent Number 7,668,730,
`I'll refer to that as the '730 patent. Is that okay
`with you?
` A. Yes, that's fine.
` Q. And I'm going to refer to the patents about
`which you've submitted declarations collectively as "the
`Jazz patents." Is that clear?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You're a registered pharmacist; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is your license still -- still current?
` A. My license is active in Colorado.
` Q. And, actually, let me mark -- or hand you your
`CV that was attached to -- well, I'll hand you your CV
`which is designated as PAR1008 which was attached to the
`IPR for the '988 patent.
` And for the record, this is -- this is your CV;
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And going back to your previous answer, you
`said your license is still current in Colorado. It's no
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 11
`
`longer current in the state of Illinois; is that
`correct?
` A. It is on a -- I don't know the term that is
`used in Illinois, but it is on the -- the equivalent of
`a dormant status, which I could apply for that to become
`active again. But it has not lapsed in the sense that
`there is no license in Illinois.
` Q. You don't currently act in a dispensing
`capacity; is that correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And the last time you did act in a dispensing
`capacity was in 1994; correct?
` A. Yes, that's correct.
` Q. Let's talk about your experience with drugs
`that are subject to restricted distribution systems or
`risk management systems. You've never dispensed Xyrem;
`correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Lack of foundation.
` A. That's correct.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) You've also never dispensed
`Revlimid; correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. You've also never dispensed Thalomid; correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. No, I have not. I don't believe -- I'm not
`
`Page 12
`
`sure that's a product.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. You've also never
`dispensed a drug that was the subject of an FDA-approved
`risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS;
`correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. No. I don't believe so, no.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) And you've never dispensed a
`drug that was subject to an FDA-approved risk
`minimization action plan, or RiskMAP; correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form. Foundation.
` A. I don't know.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. Now, in your
`declarations, you stated you've dispensed Accutane and
`Clozaril; correct?
` A. I would have to refer to those -- those
`declarations to verify any statements I made in them.
` Q. Sure. To your knowledge, have you previously
`dispensed Accutane and Clozaril?
` A. Again, I would have to refer to my declarations
`where I stated my -- my recollection -- recollections
`clearly.
` Q. Okay. If you had dispensed either of those
`drugs, the last time you would have had the opportunity
`to do so would have been in 1994; correct?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 4 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 13
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I couldn't speculate on the last opportunity.
`I'm currently licensed to practice in Colorado.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay.
` A. So I couldn't speculate on when that would be.
` Q. But you haven't dispensed any drugs since 1994,
`though; correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. You don't have any experience designing a risk
`management program; correct?
` A. I have experience --
` MR. BURGY: Sorry. Just slow down just a
`little bit.
` Objection. Foundation.
` A. I have experience with consulting with
`pharmaceutical companies who design and implement risk
`management and risk evaluation and mitigation programs.
`I have familiarity with the FDA and their processes and,
`if justified, at FDA hearings about product risk.
` I have practiced pharmacy in various settings
`to be aware of which products I can dispense and under
`which circumstances, and so I have awareness of the
`RiskMAP and REMS programs that way.
` I've been educated about them in my education
`and training. I have in turn educated future
`
`Page 14
`practitioners about them in their education and training
`in my career as an academic.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. But you have not
`designed a risk management program; correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I believe I just answered.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) No. You told me a bunch of
`things that you did do. I'm asking, have you actually
`designed a risk management program?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I guess I'm not clear on what you mean by
`"design a program."
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Sure. Is there any risk
`management programs that you had a hand in creating?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I'm not quite sure, you know, what you mean by
`"had a hand in creating."
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Any involvement in creating a
`risk management program?
` MR. BURGY: Same objection.
` A. Again, my -- I had stated my -- my involvement
`with pharmaceutical companies in advising and consulting
`on matters related to risk management, RiskMAP, and REMS
`programs.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) That's actually what I'm asking
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`about.
` For the consulting that you've done with
`pharmaceutical companies, what risk management programs
`have you consulted on?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. Again, I've provided advice to them on product
`drug, product risk, and possible strategies for risk
`mitigation of the -- of those risks.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Was that consulting in
`connection with a particular drug, or was it just
`general consulting?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. It was with respect to a specific drug.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Can you name any specific drugs
`that you have consulted with on the development of a
`risk management program?
` A. Under prior agreement under my -- terms of my
`consulting agreement, I can't disclose the names of the
`products or the companies in that instance.
` Q. Okay. And do you recall what category of
`drugs -- well, let me ask this -- sorry -- a preliminary
`question.
` How many drugs were you involved with in that
`capacity?
` A. I don't recall the exact number. I don't want
`
`Page 16
`
`to misspeak.
` Q. Do you know -- do you recall generally?
` A. I believe it was -- again, I don't want to
`misspeak, but I believe it was two or three. I don't
`have the exact number.
` Q. Do you know what therapeutic category those
`drugs fell in?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. Yes.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Can you disclose that
`information?
` A. No. Under the terms of my consulting
`agreement, I can't disclose the product information.
` Q. Was there a specific category of risk that you
`were trying to minimize in your consulting?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Foundation.
` A. I don't believe I can disclose that per the
`terms of my consulting agreement. I'd rather not rather
`than risk violating that agreement.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Sure. You also mentioned some
`FDA testimony. When was that?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I don't recall the exact date. It would have
`been in the fall of 2004. I do not recall the exact
`date, however.
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 5 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 17
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Do you recall what product it
`was for?
` A. It was -- that was related to a variety of
`products. It was more than one.
` Q. Okay. Do you recall what products they were?
` A. That was related to the class of drugs called
`antidepressants.
` Q. Do you know what kind of antidepressants?
` A. That particular hearing dealt with all
`antidepressants in general.
` Q. Is there a risk management program related to
`antidepressants?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I have not been asked to opine on that, and I
`don't know specifically.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Was that the only time that you
`consulted or testified before the FDA regarding a risk
`management program?
` A. I'm not sure. That may be a compound question,
`whether I consulted or testified before the FDA.
` Q. Can -- let's start with -- let's start with
`testified.
` Is that the only time you testified before the
`FDA regarding a risk management program?
` A. Yes.
`
`Page 18
` Q. And have you consulted with the FDA regarding
`risk management programs?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What was the -- would you explain what
`consulting you've done for the FDA regarding risk
`management programs?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I was contacted by the FDA to present my
`research at the hearing that I mentioned previously in
`the fall of 2004.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) So the consulting was in
`connection with the hearing on antidepressants; is that
`right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Is that the only consulting that you've done
`with the FDA?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you have any experience implementing a risk
`management program?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. The experiences I have I described as
`previously.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) All right. So the experiences
`you described encompass all of your experience with risk
`management -- with risk management programs; is that
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 19
`
`correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. It may not include every experience. There's
`also been practice experience that I've had, general
`awareness through practice -- obtained through practice
`in a variety of different settings. Learning what is
`and isn't done in those settings, what is referred out
`to other settings, learning about these programs through
`continuing professional education, scientific
`conferences, the ongoing maintenance of my knowledge and
`experience base over the last 20 years as well, which
`encompasses many activities.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. You mentioned what is
`and what is not done in these settings. Just so I'm
`clear, what did you mean by the word "settings"?
` A. In that context, I refer to "settings" as
`pharmacy practice settings.
` Q. And you said what is -- correct me if I
`misquote you. You said what is done in-house and what
`is referred out of those settings.
` What did you mean by the "referred out" of the
`settings?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. Referring to the usual and customary practices
`within various settings and what is done there and then
`
`Page 20
`
`what is -- if not done in a certain setting, is then
`referred to another setting or system of distribution
`for certain products.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Can you give me an example of
`what you meant by that?
` A. For example, if I were working in a retail
`pharmacy, chain pharmacy, for example, like a corner
`drugstore, and was presented with an order for home
`infusion of intravenous antibiotics by a physician or a
`patient, that may not be something that that pharmacy
`setting is equipped to handle. And, therefore, we would
`not receive that order because we were not able to do
`that and would refer their business elsewhere, to the
`appropriate businesses that could.
` Q. I understand. Thank you.
` Do you know approximately how many drugs are
`subject to FDA-approved REMS?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. No, I do not know.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Do you know how many drugs are
`subject to FDA-approved RiskMAPs?
` MR. BURGY: Same objection.
` A. No, I do not know.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Do you know how many drugs are
`distributed under restricted distribution systems?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 6 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 21
`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. BURGY: Same objection.
` A. No, I do not.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) You don't hold yourself out as
`an FDA regulatory expert; correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I have expertise in FDA charter, structure,
`process, and activity through the course of my education
`and training, through the course of my practice, through
`the course of my consulting and academic experiences,
`through the course of my continuing professional
`education, through my direct experiences attending and
`testifying at FDA hearing, and the like.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) That wasn't my question. I
`just asked if you held yourself out as a expert in FDA
`regulatory matters.
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I believe I have expertise in FDA-related
`matters to the extent that I delineated.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) I'm going to hand you a
`document that's being marked for identification as
`Exhibit 2042.
` MR. STOPS: I believe that's the next up
`number. If anybody has a different number, just let me
`know.
` (Exhibit Number 2042 was marked.)
`
`Page 22
`
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Dr. Valuck, this is a
`deposition transcript that you've given in a matter in
`2010; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. If you would turn to page 84 of the document.
`The page number is on the bottom right. In your top
`answer you testified, "Again, similarly, I think that's
`a matter for the drug company and the FDA, to figure out
`what the reasonable action is based upon available
`evidence and what is required for labeling or what is
`required for risk management or mitigation strategies
`that might be employed, and I'm not an FDA regulatory
`expert and, therefore, I can't really speak to it."
` Do you see that?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Foundation. Relevance.
` A. Yes, I see that.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) You gave that testimony in
`2010; correct?
` A. Yes, that's correct.
` Q. And you agree that because you're not an FDA
`regulatory expert, you can't really speak to what is
`required for risk management or mitigation strategies;
`correct?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form, foundation, and
`relevance.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Again, I believe I've stated what I feel
`comfortable and certain that I can speak to with my
`expertise related to the FDA, and I believe it's more --
`more specific than a blanket statement about --
`yes-or-no expertise about FDA matters.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Okay. And you went on to
`testify about risk management for mitigation strategies.
`This is now the second answer on page 84.
` "I think it's a possible action that could be
`taken, and that's a contextual thing that then would be
`up to the FDA and the drug company to determine what the
`appropriate thing to do would be. It's outside my
`expertise."
` Do you see that?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form, relevance, and
`foundation.
` A. Yes, I see that.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) And, again, you testified to
`that in 2010; correct?
` MR. BURGY: Same objections.
` A. Yes.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) You have your CV in front of
`you that is PAR Exhibit 1008. Is this CV up to date?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. Not completely, no.
`
`Page 24
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Do you know how out of date the
`CV is? And just from my reading of this, it appears to
`cut off in 2013.
` A. This copy was updated as of September 1st,
`2013.
` Q. How do you know that date?
` A. It's on the last page, page 41. When I update
`the CV, I note the date when I make the most recent
`updates.
` Q. And that's the small text in the parenthetical
`underneath the words "References available upon
`request"?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Thank you.
` So if you turn to page 2 of the CV, I just have
`a few questions to update some of the material on it.
`You have three current academic appointments as of this
`copy of your CV. Is that still current?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you teach any courses -- so -- sorry.
`Strike that.
` The first academic appointment is professor in
`the Department of Epidemiology at the Colorado School of
`Public Health.
` Do you teach any courses as part of that
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 7 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 25
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`appointment?
` A. I teach in courses as part of that appointment.
` Q. What do you mean by that?
` A. That I am not the primary course coordinator or
`professor that has full responsibility for the course.
`I may provide certain lectures on certain topics within
`courses.
` Q. I understand.
` Is that the same with respect to your teaching
`in the second appointment at the University of Colorado
`Denver, School of Medicine?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. In the third appointment at the University of
`Colorado Denver, School of Pharmacy, you are -- you have
`a certain -- current teaching assignments underneath.
`Are those still current?
` A. No.
` Q. I'm sorry. You said no?
` A. No.
` Q. Can you update that now?
` A. Yes. There have been small changes in the
`subarea labeled "Pharm.D. Curriculum (Entry-level
`program)."
` The first item listed, PHRD6400, has been
`changed slightly in name to a different course
`
`Page 26
`numbering. I don't have the exact number with me. The
`course has been expanded in scope slightly, and,
`therefore, the title of the course has changed from the
`currently listed "Clinical Biostatistics" to a new
`course title of "Evidence-Based Medicine and Literature
`Evaluation." The roles listed in parentheses have not
`changed.
` The additional items there, PHRD4550, the
`numbering has changed only on that item. But, again, I
`don't know right now without referring to current
`numbering what the current number system -- number is
`for that item.
` Q. Okay. Thank you.
` A. And, similarly, for the third item, the
`numbering has changed. I don't know the new number.
`And the sequencing number -- by which I mean
`"Professional Skills Development IV" -- that Roman
`numeral has changed as well, though I don't recall the
`new number of the Professional Skills Development course
`sequencing in which I am a guest lecturer.
` Q. Okay. Are there any new academic appointments
`that should be listed on your CV?
` A. No.
` Q. On the top of page 3, your previous courses
`taught at UCHSC School of Pharmacy, what does the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`"UCHSC" stand for?
` A. Yes. The "UCHSC" stands for the University of
`Colorado Health Sciences Center School of Pharmacy.
` Q. Is that a different institution than the -- the
`University of Colorado Denver, School of Pharmacy?
` A. No, it is not.
` Q. Okay. In Section C on page 3 of your CV, you
`list your past five years of consulting. Is there any
`additional or new consulting in the last two years since
`your CV was last updated?
` A. I can't answer that for certain without
`referring to my files and my records to be able to
`determine for sure if anything had happened in the last
`two years that could be included under that topic.
` Q. Okay. Under Section D, "Professional," the
`first listing is "Clinical Pharmacist (home health
`care)."
` What is home health care?
` A. Home health care is a -- in the context that I
`use it, home health care is a practice setting for
`pharmacy practice in which drug products and/or services
`are provided to patients in their homes.
` Q. I didn't know that existed. Okay. In the
`fourth entry under "Professional," you have it listed as
`a decentralized pharmacist. Do you see that?
`
`Page 28
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. What's a decentralized pharmacist?
` A. A decentralized pharmacist, as I use the term,
`is a pharmacist who practices primarily outside of a
`centralized pharmacy location but still within a
`hospital setting or system.
` Q. What's a centralized pharmacy?
` A. A centralized pharmacy, in the -- in the way
`that I use the term, is the primary location where drug
`products are stored, where pharmaceutical products in
`the hospital setting may be compounded or created
`specifically for specific patients where most of the
`distributive functions of pharmacy are practiced.
` Q. A corner pharmacy would be considered a
`centralized pharmacy in your use of the term?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. I would not use the term "centralized" or
`"decentralized" outside of the hospital setting --
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) Oh.
` A. -- the way I use the term. I use it for --
`I -- I'd like to expand on that.
` I would view home health care as a case where
`it's not a typical, you know, corner drugstore. That's
`a more distrib- -- that has a distributed model as well,
`home health care does, where there is a centralized
`
`JANE ROSE REPORTING
`1-800-825-3341
`
`National Court-Reporting Coverage
`janerose@janerosereporting.com
`
`Page 8 of 75
`
`

`
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`Amneal and Par v. Jazz
`
`FINAL - October 8, 2015
`Robert Valuck, Ph.D., R.Ph. - Vol. 1
`
`Page 29
`function of drug product creation, compounding,
`formulation, and initial shipment and distribution. And
`then there are additional distributive functions
`associated with home health care as well.
` But typically the term "centralized/
`decentralized" referring to -- but could be -- again,
`could be applied outside those settings.
` Q. Is home health care an example of a
`decentralized pharmacist function?
` A. As I mentioned, there are components to home
`health care. Some of them are centralized in a specific
`location. Others are distributive -- excuse me --
`others are decentralized and relate to the patient in
`their home.
` Q. Okay. The treatment of the patient in the home
`is a decentralized pharmacist function; is that right?
` MR. BURGY: Objection. Form.
` A. Such a function may be performed by a
`pharmacist either at the centralized location or in the
`home.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) In the hospital setting is
`the -- when -- strike that.
` In the hospital setting when you were acting as
`a decentralized pharmacist, were you providing
`pharmaceuticals to patients outside of the hospital?
`
`Page 30
`
` A. In that particular case at University Hospital,
`I was not.
` MR. BURGY: I'm sorry. Were you done?
` THE DEPONENT: Yes.
` Q. (By Mr. Stops) You were -- so you were
`providing pharmaceuticals to patients within the
`hospital setting?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Then why was it decentralized, then?
` A. Pharmacists were deployed in our -- during the
`time there -- that I was employed there, the pharmacists
`were deployed in various

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket