throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 29
`Date: August 17, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC AND PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases: IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`BRIAN P. MURPHY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BONILLA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Motions to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses issues that are the same in the identified cases.
`We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case.
`The parties are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`
`
`As authorized by the Board in e-mail correspondence of July 14, 2015,
`counsel for Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (together,
`“Petitioner”) filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Substitute New Counsel
`in the above-identified proceedings, IPR2015-00545, IPR2015-00546, and
`IPR2015-00547. Paper 20 (“Motion”).2
`In its Petition, Petitioner identifies Dennies Varughese and Deborah Sterling,
`both of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, P.L.L.C, as lead and back-up counsel,
`respectively. Paper 4 (“Pet.”), 60. Petitioner now requests withdrawal of that
`counsel and to substitute new counsel, i.e., Matthew Ruedy and Steven Maddox,
`both of Maddox Edwards PLLC, as lead and back-up counsel, respectively.
`Motion 1. Patent Owner Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does not oppose. Id.
`Petitioner also has filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. Maddox as
`back-up counsel for Petitioner. Paper 21. We grant that Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission in a separate Order. Paper 28.
`Counsel may withdraw from an inter partes review proceeding only with
`authorization from the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e). Because no prejudice is
`shown and no party opposes in the instance cases, we see no reason to deny the
`Motion.
`It is therefore
`ORDERED that Dennies Varughese and Deborah Sterling are allowed to
`withdraw as counsel from these proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Matthew Ruedy is recognized as lead counsel,
`and Steven Maddox is recognized as back-up counsel for Petitioner; and
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2015-00545 as representative unless otherwise indicated.
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file an updated Mandatory
`Notice within one week of the date of this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Dennies Varughese
`Deborah A. Sterling
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`dvarughe-PTAB@skgf.com
`dsterlin-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Matthew C. Ruedy
`Steven A. Maddox
`Maddox Edwards PLLC
`1900 K Street NW
`Suite 725
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito
`Evangeline Shih
`Frank Calvosa
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`evangelineshih@quinnemanuel.com
`frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
`
`John V. Biernacki
`JONES DAY
`jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket