throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper: 11
`Date: May 12, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC AND PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases: IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`IPR2015-00548 (Patent 7,895,059 B2)
`IPR2015-00551 (Patent 8,547,988 B1)
`IPR2015-00554 (Patent 7,668,730 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`BRIAN P. MURPHY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`MURPHY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses issues that are the same in the identified cases.
`We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case.
`The parties are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`IPR2015-00548 (Patent 7,895,059 B2)
`IPR2015-00551 (Patent 8,547,988 B1)
`IPR2015-00554 (Patent 7,668,730 B2)
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Petitioner Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par Inc.”) filed Petitions requesting
`inter partes review in each of the above-identified proceedings, and Petitioner
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Amneal”) filed Petitions requesting inter partes
`review in four of the above-identified proceedings, IPR2015-00545, IPR2015-
`00546, IPR2015-00547, and IPR2015-00554. Paper 3 (“Pet.”).2 The Petitions in
`IPR2015-00548 (Paper 1, 58) and IPR2015-00551 (Paper 1, 58) identify Par Inc. as
`the sole real-party-in-interest, and the Petitions in IPR2015-00545, IPR2015-
`00546, IPR2015,00547, and IPR2015-00554 identify Amneal and Par Inc. as the
`real-parties-in-interest. Pet. 59.
`
`Patent Owner Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) filed a
`Preliminary Response (“Prelim. Resp.”) in each proceeding asserting that parent
`companies of Par Inc. – Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (“Par Co.”), Par
`Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. (“Par Holdings”),3 Sky Growth Intermediate
`Holdings I Corporation (“Sky I”), and Sky Growth Intermediate Holdings II
`Corporation (“Sky II”) – should have been identified as real-parties-in-interest in
`each of the above-identified proceedings. Prelim. Resp. 9–23. Patent Owner
`asserts, in particular, that “Par Inc.’s parent companies exercise control over Par
`Inc.’s business, including control over th[ese] IPR proceeding[s].” Id. at 9–10, 19–
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2015-00545 as representative unless otherwise indicated.
`3 Par Holdings was formed in 2012 as Sky Growth Holdings Corporation, but
`changed its name to Par Holdings on March 4, 2015. Prelim. Resp. 9 n.3 (citing
`Ex. 2015, 13).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`IPR2015-00548 (Patent 7,895,059 B2)
`IPR2015-00551 (Patent 8,547,988 B1)
`IPR2015-00554 (Patent 7,668,730 B2)
`
`21. Patent Owner requests dismissal of the Petitions as untimely pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 315(b). Id. at 10, 22–23.
`Approximately one week after Patent Owner filed its Preliminary Responses
`to the Petitions, counsel for Petitioners contacted the Board to request
`authorization to file a “short reply brief and declaration testimony from corporate
`officers” to address the real-party-in-interest issues raised in Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Responses. Within an hour, counsel for Patent Owner advised the
`Board that it did not oppose the request of Par Inc. and Amneal to contest the real-
`party-in-interest issue, but asked that Par Inc. and Amneal “not be permitted to
`submit testimonial evidence with their oppositions.” In the event the Board was
`inclined to permit testimonial evidence, then Patent Owner requested the
`opportunity “to depose each of Petitioners’ declarants” and to file a reply to
`Petitioners’ arguments.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2), we may consider a petition for inter
`partes review “only if . . . the petition identifies all real parties in interest.” Our
`rules require Petitioners and Patent Owners to “[i]dentify each real party-in-interest
`for the party.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.8. Thus, the question of whether Petitioners have
`identified all real parties-in-interest is a threshold issue for our consideration.
`Having considered each party’s position, we have determined that limited
`additional briefing and evidence, directed solely to the real-party-in-interest issues
`raised by Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses, would be beneficial to the Board.
`We are particularly interested in evidence relevant to Patent Owner’s contention
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`IPR2015-00548 (Patent 7,895,059 B2)
`IPR2015-00551 (Patent 8,547,988 B1)
`IPR2015-00554 (Patent 7,668,730 B2)
`
`that “[a]t least Par Holdings and Par Co. are exercising control over th[ese] IPR”
`proceedings. Prelim. Resp. 19–21.
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner Par Inc. may file not more than two (2)
`declarations of not more than five (5) pages each (excluding cover and service
`pages), directed solely to the real-party-in-interest issues raised by Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Responses. The two declarations shall be filed in each of the
`above-identified cases no later than May 26, 2015;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Par Inc. and Amneal shall file a
`single, identical response of not more than ten (10) pages, directed solely to the
`real-party-in-interest issues raised by Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses. The
`single, identical response shall be filed in each of the above-identified cases,
`adjusting only the names of Petitioners in the case captions and citation form, as
`necessary, not later than May 26, 2015;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Par Inc. shall make each of its
`declarants available for deposition by counsel for Patent Owner, limited solely to
`the factual issues raised in each declarant’s declaration, at a time and location
`mutually agreeable to the parties and witnesses in order to permit the parties to
`comply with the filing date requirements of this Order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Patent Owner may depose Petitioner
`Par Inc.’s declarants for not more than three (3) hours of deposition time each;
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00545 (Patent 8,589,182 B1)
`IPR2015-00546 (Patent 7,765,106 B2)
`IPR2015-00547 (Patent 7,765,107 B2)
`IPR2015-00548 (Patent 7,895,059 B2)
`IPR2015-00551 (Patent 8,547,988 B1)
`IPR2015-00554 (Patent 7,668,730 B2)
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file a single, identical reply
`of not more than five (5) pages to Petitioners’ response in each of the above-
`identified cases, adjusting only the names of Petitioners in the case captions and
`citation form, as necessary, not later than June 9, 2015; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall not be permitted to file any
`further response to Patent Owner’s reply.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Dennies Varughese
`dvarughe-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`Deborah Sterling
`dsterlin-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Francis Cerrito
`nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`
`John Biernacki
`jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket