throbber
Macromolecules 1997, 30, 417-426
`
`417
`
`Fabrication of Quantum Dot/Polymer Composites:
`Phosphine-Functionalized Block Copolymers as Passivating
`Hosts for Cadmium Selenide Nanoclusters
`
`D. E. Fogg,† L. H. Radzilowski,‡ R. Blanski,† R. R. Schrock,*,† and
`E. L. Thomas‡
`Departments of Chemistry and Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute
`of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
`Received July 25, 1996; Revised Manuscript Received November 26, 1996X
`
`ABSTRACT: Nearly monodisperse CdSe nanoclusters, surface-passivated with a layer of trioctylphosphine
`and trioctylphosphine oxide, have been sequestered within phosphine-containing domains in a diblock
`copolymer. A convergent approach to fabrication of these composites was adopted via independent
`synthesis of nanoclusters and polymer. Diblock copolymers of phosphine- or phosphine oxide-function-
`alized monomers and methyltetracyclododecene (MTD) were prepared by ring opening metathesis
`polymerization using Mo alkylidene initiators. Nanoclusters were prepared by pyrolysis of CdMe2 and
`SedP(octyl)3 in the presence of P(octyl)3 and OdP(octyl)3. An immediate and sustained increase in
`electronic passivation is found for nanoclusters incorporated into octylphosphine-containing polymers.
`In contrast, nanoclusters in pure hydrocarbon or phosphine oxide-containing polymers rapidly lose
`passivation. Films of nanoclusters in a phosphine-containing polymer matrix were static cast from dilute
`solution. Under suitable conditions, the copolymers underwent microphase separation, and the metal
`chalcogenide clusters were predominantly sequestered within the phosphine-containing microdomains.
`The original, highly uniform cluster size distribution was unaffected.
`
`Introduction
`
`Much recent effort has been directed toward the
`fabrication of polymers containing nanometer-sized
`clusters of inorganic semiconductors.1-6 Recent ad-
`vances in the synthesis of highly monodisperse CdSe
`nanoclusters (“quantum dots”),7 coupled with method-
`ologies for the preparation of ROMP polymers with very
`narrow molecular weight distributions,8-11 offer an
`unprecedented level of control over the molecular ar-
`chitecture of the composite materials. Most of the
`reported approaches to such composites involve in situ
`aggregation of labile metal species within a polymer
`matrix. For example, organometallic-hydrocarbon
`diblock copolymers have been prepared by living ring-
`opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of methyl-
`tetracyclododecene (MTD) and metal-functionalized nor-
`bornene monomers.12-14 Microphase separation, fol-
`lowed by hydrogenation or pyrolysis, yielded nanometer-
`sized particles of elemental metal within approximately
`spherical microdomains; cluster size was defined by the
`number of monomers within the metal-functionalized
`block. In a related approach, copolymers of MTD and
`donor-functionalized norbornenes were treated with
`labile metal species.3,15,16 Controlled decomposition of
`the polymer-attached metal complex produced metal
`clusters distributed throughout the polymer matrix. The
`size of the metal clusters formed in lamellar or cylindri-
`cal microdomains typically varied in diameter by (20%,
`although evidence suggests that a single cluster can
`form in a suitably small spherical microdomain. Uni-
`form dispersion of nanoclusters in solid media is fre-
`quently hampered by phase separation and cluster
`aggregation within the matrix.
`In these examples
`dispersion is effected by the affinity of the metal for the
`donor groups uniformly distributed within one block.
`
`† Department of Chemistry.
`‡ Department of Materials Science and Engineering.
`X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, January 15,
`1997.
`
`An alternative, convergent approach is adopted in the
`present work, in which prefabricated clusters are in-
`corporated within a polymer containing phosphine
`donors attached to the polymer backbone. This ap-
`proach permits us to exploit recently developed methods
`for the preparation of CdSe quantum dots with remark-
`ably narrow size distributions (<5% rms in diameter).7
`Novel optical properties are conferred on the composites
`as a result of the uniform, small particle size. The
`length scale of the clusters (maximum diameter (cid:24)50 Å)
`is smaller than the Bohr diameter of the exciton in bulk
`CdSe (112 Å), leading to three-dimensional quantum
`confinement of photogenerated electron-hole pairs.
`Quantum confinement results in the appearance of
`discrete absorption bands, blue-shifted relative to bulk
`CdSe (for which the excited states form a continuum).
`The extent of the shift is very sensitive to cluster size,
`and visible absorption spectroscopy provides a useful
`probe of both cluster size and the size distribution.
`A further, fundamental advance in these materials
`lies in the luminescent properties of the clusters.
`Electronic passivation of the nanoclusters is effected by
`saturating the cluster surface with bulky trioctylphos-
`phine/trioctylphosphine oxide groups, thus preventing
`localization of the carriers in trap states, and sterically
`enforcing segregation of the clusters. The resulting
`overlap between the electron and hole wavefunctions
`of the exciton leads to a high rate of radiative recom-
`bination, and quantum yields of up to 10% are observed
`in room-temperature fluorescence experiments.7
`Our principal interest to date has focused on the
`development of suitable donor-functionalized monomers
`and optimization of their polymerization, as well as the
`cluster-sequestering ability of the resulting polymers.
`In principle, the properties of the host polymer (either
`in a random or block copolymer) can be tailored for the
`intended application. For example, the photoelectronic
`properties of uniformly dispersed nanoclusters could be
`exploited to provide electronic devices within a conduc-
`tive polymer matrix.
`In this work we report the
`
`S0024-9297(96)01103-5 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society
`
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`418 Fogg et al.
`
`development of copolymers that contain phosphine- and
`phosphine oxide-functionalized norbornene blocks. Quan-
`titative uptake of trioctylphosphine/phosphine oxide-
`capped CdSe quantum dots by these materials is
`described. In the case of the phosphine-functionalized
`polymers, excellent retention of the narrow size distri-
`bution of the clusters is found. Fluorescence is en-
`hanced, indicating an increase in electronic passivation
`in the donor matrix. Transmission electron microscopy
`(TEM) examination of thin films of the composites
`reveals segregation of the clusters within an extended
`network of phosphine-rich domains. Samples micro-
`tomed from the bulk show segregation into spherical
`microdomains. We are currently exploring the potential
`of these materials for exciton delocalization and charge
`transport. Future work will focus on synthesis of
`copolymers containing electron- and hole-carrier seg-
`ments, for the development of new materials for elec-
`troluminescence applications.
`
`Experimental Section
`General. All experiments, unless otherwise noted, were
`performed under a nitrogen atmosphere in a Vacuum Atmo-
`sphere drybox or by using standard Schlenk/vacuum line
`techniques. Hexanes, diethyl ether, and tetrahydrofuran
`(THF) for polymerization were distilled from purple sodium
`benzophenone ketyl under nitrogen and then stored in the
`drybox over activated 4 Å molecular sieves. Pentane was
`washed with 5% nitric acid in sulfuric acid, stored over calcium
`chloride, and then distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl
`under nitrogen. n-Butanol, cyclohexane, and methylene chlo-
`ride were used as received. Tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (92%)
`and tri-n-octylphosphine were obtained from Johnson Matthey.
`The former was used as received, the latter was distilled under
`Ar prior to use. Selenium shot (1.6 mm, 99.999+%) was used
`as received from Johnson Matthey. Dimethylcadmium was
`obtained from Organometallics, Inc., purified by filtration and
`distillation, and stored under N2 at -40 °C. Methyltetra-
`cyclododecene (MTD) was provided by B. F. Goodrich and was
`purified by vacuum distillation from sodium. 5-Norbornen-
`2-yl-methanol and 1,5-dibromopentane were obtained from
`Aldrich Chemical Co. and used as received. ROMP initiators
`Mo(CHCMe2Ph)(NAr)(O-t-Bu)2 (Ar ) 2,6-C6H3-i-Pr2; Ar¢)2,6-
`C6H3-Me2),17 racemic NORPHOS18 (NORPHOS ) 2-exo-3-endo-
`bis(diphenylphosphino)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptene), and P(NEt2)-
`19 were synthesized according to literature procedures.
`(oct)2
`The synthesis of 2-(chloromethyl)-5-norbornene was carried out
`as described in the literature,20 except at room temperature
`instead of reflux temperature.
`Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded
`on a Varian XL301 (300.0 MHz for 1H, 121.4 MHz for 31P) FT-
`NMR spectrometer. Proton spectra were measured in C6D6
`unless otherwise noted; data are listed in parts per million
`downfield from tetramethylsilane and referenced against the
`residual proton signals from the deuterated solvent ((cid:228) 7.16,
`C6D6) as internal standard. 31P NMR spectra are referenced
`against 85% H3PO4 as an external standard. Downfield shifts
`are taken as positive for all nuclei. Gel permeation chromato-
`graphic (GPC) analysis was carried out at room temperature
`employing a Rheodyne Model 7125 sample injector, a Kratos
`Spectroflow 408 pump, two Jordi-Gel DVB mixed bed columns
`in series, and a Viscotek differential refractometer/viscometer
`H-500 on samples 0.1-0.3% (w/v) in THF, which were filtered
`through a Millex-SR 0.5 (cid:237)m filter in order to remove particu-
`lates. GPC columns were calibrated versus commercially
`available polystyrene standards (Polymer Laboratories Ltd.)
`ranging from 1206 to 1.03 (cid:2) 106 MW. Fluorescence experi-
`ments were performed on a SPEX Fluorolog-2 spectrometer,
`using front face collection with 0.4 mm slits. Fluorescence
`spectra for (cid:24)37 Å clusters (absorbance (cid:236)max 536 nm) were
`collected between 480 and 600 nm with 436 nm excitation, and
`for (cid:24)45 Å clusters (absorbance (cid:236)max 578 nm), between 530 and
`640 nm with 478 nm excitation. Optical absorption spectra
`
`Macromolecules, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1997
`
`were obtained at room temperature on a Hewlett-Packard
`8452A diode array spectrometer, using 1 cm quartz cuvettes.
`Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a
`JEOL 200 CX in bright field at 100 kV.
`Nanocluster Synthesis. CdSe quantum dots were pre-
`pared by pyrolysis of CdMe2 and SedP(oct)3 (oct ) octyl) in
`the presence of P(oct)3 and its oxide, as described by Murray
`et al.7 Slightly higher temperatures (330 °C) were employed.
`Size-selection was effected by three cycles of reprecipitation
`from nBuOH-hexanes (5:1) by dropwise addition of MeOH.
`Clusters were dried in vacuo and stored under N2 in a drybox.
`PCl(oct)2. Ethereal HCl (1 M, 335 mL) was added dropwise
`to an ice-cold solution of P(NEt3)(oct)2 (50 g, 0.152 mol) in
`diethyl ether (300 mL). The mixture was allowed to warm to
`room temperature. It was checked for acidity, filtered through
`Celite in order to remove diethylamine hydrochloride, and then
`stripped to dryness. The crude product was distilled to yield
`27.5 g (62%) of a colorless oil (bp 128-135 °C, 0.4 Torr): 1H
`NMR (cid:228) 1.21-1.51 (m, 28H, CH2), 0.87-0.92 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 6H,
`CH3); 31P{1H} NMR (cid:228) 113.5 (s); 13C{1H} NMR (cid:228) 35.5 (d, JPC )
`28 Hz), 32.2 (s), 31.2 (d, JPC ) 10 Hz), 29.6 (s), 29.57 (s), 24.9
`(d, JPC ) 12 Hz), 23.1 (s), 14.3 (s).
`5-Norbornen-2-yl-CH2P(oct)2 [NBE-CH2P(oct)2, 1]. A
`solution of NBE-CH2Cl (5.60 g, 39.3 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was
`added dropwise to a suspension of Mg powder (1.15 g, 47.1
`mmol) in THF (50 mL). The solution was refluxed for 3 h,
`cooled, and filtered through Celite in the drybox. Titration
`against MeOH (1,10-phenanthroline indicator) indicated 28.3
`mmol of active Grignard, which was added to a chilled solution
`of PCl(oct)2 (8.285 g, 28.3 mmol) in THF (40 mL). The solution
`was stirred for 12 h and then stripped of solvent and extracted
`with pentane. The pentane extract was filtered, stripped, and
`distilled to yield 9.1 g (64%) of 1 as a colorless oil (bp 150 °C,
`0.1 Torr): 1H NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer, (cid:24)80%) 6.11-6.13 (m, 1H,
`olefinic), 6.04-6.07 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.94 (br s, 1H, bridgehead
`CH), 2.67 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.1-2.23 (m, 1H, exo CH),
`1.94-1.98 (m, 1H, exo CH of CH2), 1.17-1.57 (m, 32H, CH2),
`0.88-0.92 (m, 6H, CH3), 0.68-0.78 (m, 1H, endo CH of CH2);
`(exo isomer, partial) 5.94-6.0 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.71 (br s, 1H,
`bridgehead CH); 31P{1H} NMR (cid:228) -35.3 (s, exo), -35.7 (s, endo).
`5-Norbornen-2-yl-CH2P(O)(oct)2 [NBE-CH2P(O)(oct)2,
`2]. A solution of 30% aqueous H2O2 (3.7 mL, 33 mmol) was
`added dropwise to ice-cooled 1 (6.0 g, 16.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2
`(50 mL) in air. The solution was stirred for 2 h and then
`stripped of solvent. The crude, pale yellow product was
`distilled to give 5.6 g (90%) of 2 as a colorless oil (bp 180 °C,
`1H NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer, (cid:24)80%) 6.09 (m, 1H,
`0.03 Torr):
`olefinic), 6.03-6.04 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.99 (br s, 1H, bridgehead
`CH), 2.63 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.34-2.50 (m, 1H, exo
`CH), 1.88-1.95 (m, 1H, exo CH of CH2), 1.1-1.6 (m, 32H, CH2),
`0.87-0.92 (m, 6H, CH3), 0.55-0.63 (m, 1H, endo CH of CH2);
`(exo isomer, partial) 5.91-5.98 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.71 (br s,
`1H, bridgehead CH), 2.74 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH); 31P{1H}
`NMR (121 MHz, C6D6) (cid:228) 49.6 (s, exo), 49.8 (s, endo); 13C{1H}
`NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer) 138.4, 133.1 (C olefinic), 50.2, 48.1, 43.6,
`43.1, 34.8, 32.6, 31.9, 30.0, 29.9, 23.5, 22.4, 14.7; (exo isomer,
`partial) 137.5, 137.1 (C olefinic), 50.1, 49.4, 45.9, 39.9, 34.3,
`33.4, 30.5, 29.6, 29.4, 28.7, 28.5, 27.0.
`5-Norbornen-2-yl-CH2O(CH2)5Br [NBE-CH2O(CH2)5Br,
`3]. Aqueous NaOH (50% w/w, 195 g) was added to a mixture
`of 5-norbornene-2-methanol (50.7 g, 0.408 mmol) and 1,5-
`dibromopentane (169.1 g, 0.735 mol) in cyclohexane (400 mL)
`+Cl- (9.5 g, 23.5 mmol), was
`in air. Aliquat, CH3N[(CH2)7CH3]3
`added as phase-transfer catalyst, and the mixture stirred for
`9 days, or until no unreacted alcohol was observable by 1H
`NMR. The organic layer was then separated, washed with
`H2O (3 (cid:2)100 mL), dried over MgSO 4, and stripped of solvent.
`Fractional distillation under vacuum gave 62.3 g (56%) of a
`clear, colorless oil (bp 125-130 °C, 0.15 Torr) after removal of
`unreacted dibromopentane (bp 65-70 °C, 1 Torr): 1H NMR (cid:228)
`(endo isomer, (cid:24)80%) 6.04-6.09 (m, 1H, olefinic), 5.86-5.88
`(m, 1H, olefinic), 2.93-3.42 (m, 6H, CH2), 2.86 (br s, 1H,
`bridgehead CH), 2.74 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.26-2.31
`(m, 1H, exo CH), 1.18-1.89 (m, 9H, CH2), 0.41-0.47 (m, 1H,
`endo CH of CH2); (exo isomer, partial) 6.01-6.02 (m, 1H,
`olefinic), 2.70 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH); 13C{1H} NMR (cid:228) (endo
`
`2 of 10
`
`

`

`Macromolecules, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1997
`
`Fabrication of Quantum Dot/Polymer Composites 419
`
`polymera
`
`[MTD]300
`[MTD]300[NORPHOS]20
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2P(O)(oct)2]20
`
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(oct)2]20
`
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(O)(oct)2]20
`
`PDIb
`Mn (found)
`1.06
`70 800
`1.16
`35 700
`1.93
`75 000c
`1.59
`2 034 000
`1.05
`53 000d
`1.03
`795 200
`1.07
`81 000
`135 000e
`1.03
`a All polymers were prepared in THF, using Mo(CHMe2Ph)(NAr)(O-t-Bu)2 as initiator. Theoretical MW values are based on 100%
`conversion of monomer and complete consumption of initiator, allowing for PhMe2CCHd and dCHPh end groups. Mn (found) was
`determined by viscometry relative to polystyrene standards. b Polydispersity index, Mw/Mn. c Main peak of bimodal trace; approximate
`relative area 6.5:1. d Main peak of bimdoal trace; approximate relative area 12:1. e Main peak of bimodal trace; approximate relative area
`2:1.
`isomer) 136.8, 132.2 (C olefinic), 49.3, 43.9, 42.1, 38.7, 33.7,
`32.6, 29.1, 28.8, 24.9; (exo isomer, partial) 136.3 (C olefinic),
`44.9, 43.6, 41.5, 38.8, 29.7. Anal. Calcd for C13H21BrO; C,
`57.15; H, 7.75. Found: C, 57.16; H, 8.01.
`5-Norbornen-2-yl-CH2O(CH2)5P(oct)2 [NBE-CH2O(CH2)5-
`P(oct)2, 4]. Neat 3 (10.0 g, 36.6 mmol) was added dropwise
`to a suspension of powdered Mg (1.20 g, 49.4 mmol) in THF
`(50 mL) over a period of 1 h and the addition funnel was rinsed
`with a small quantity of THF. The solution was gently
`refluxed for 12 h and then cooled to room temperature, brought
`into the glovebox, and filtered through Celite. The resulting
`yellow-brown Grignard reagent was titrated as for 1. The
`solution was cooled to -40 °C, and neat PCl(oct)2 (10.72 g, 36.6
`mmol) was added dropwise. The solution was stirred for 3 h,
`filtered through Celite to remove MgCl2, and stripped of
`solvent. The residue was taken up in pentane, refiltered, and
`stripped to a colorless oil (15.6 g, 94%). The product was
`purified by chromatography on neutral Al2O3 (hexanes eluant)
`and distillation (bp 220 °C, 0.03 Torr) to yield 11.4 g (69%):
`1H NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer, (cid:24)80%) 6.03-6.06 (m, 1H, olefinic),
`5.93-5.98 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.95-3.34 (m, 7H, CH2 and
`bridgehead CH), 2.64 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.36-2.38
`(m, 1H, exo CH), 1.11-1.74 (m, 37H, CH2), 0.87-0.91 (m, 6H,
`CH3), 0.41-0.47 (m, 1H, endo CH of CH2); (exo isomer, partial)
`2.82 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.68 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH);
`31P{1H} NMR (cid:228) -31.9 (s); 13C{1H} NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer) 136.9,
`132.0 (C olefinic), 49.2, 49.1, 43.7, 43.3, 41.9, 41.3, 38.5, 33.5,
`33.1, 32.3, 31.6, 28.8, 28.6, 28.5, 26.5, 24.6, 23.8, 19.4, 13.4;
`(exo isomer, partial) 136.3 (C olefinic), 44.7, 44.6, 43.4, 43.0,
`41.5, 41.2, 38.6, 31.7, 31.5, 31.4, 29.5, 29.3, 29.2, 26.6, 12.3.
`5-Norbornen-2-yl-CH2O(CH2)5P(O)(oct)2 [NBE-CH2O-
`(CH2)5P(O)(oct)2, 5]. Aqueous H2O2 (7.5 g, 33 mmol, 30% (w/
`w)) was added drop-wise to a solution of crude 4 (15.0 g, 33.3
`mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) at room temperature. The mixture
`was stirred for 5 h and then partitioned between CH2Cl2 and
`water. The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), stripped, and
`chromatographed on neutral Al2O3, eluting initially with neat
`hexanes and then with 5% acetone-hexanes. The colorless
`product was distilled under vacuum (235 °C, 0.03 Torr) to yield
`8.6 g (55%): 1H NMR (cid:228) (endo isomer, (cid:24)80%) 6.0-6.1 (m, 1H,
`olefinic), 5.93-5.98 (m, 1H, olefinic), 2.90-3.32 (m, 7H, CH2
`and bridgehead CH), 2.63 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.26-
`2.38 (m, 1H, exo CH), 1.1-1.8 (m, 37H, CH2), 0.8-0.95 (m,
`6H, CH3), 0.4-0.5 (m, 1H, endo CH of CH2); (exo isomer,
`partial) 2.8 (br s, 1H, bridgehead CH), 2.68 (br s, 1H,
`bridgehead CH); 31P{1H} NMR (cid:228) 44.2 (s); 13C{1H} NMR (cid:228) (endo
`isomer)136.6, 132.3 (C olefinic), 49.2, 44.0, 42.1, 38.8, 31.7,
`31.1, 31.0, 29.3, 29.1, 28.4, 27.5, 22.6, 21.7, 13.8; (exo isomer,
`partial) 136.4 (C olefinic), 44.9, 43.8, 41.5, 39.0, 29.5, 29.0, 27.9,
`27.7, 21.6, 21.5. Anal. Calcd for C29H55O2P; C, 74.63; H, 11.88.
`Found: C, 74.49; H, 11.98.
`Reaction of Phosphine Monomers with Mo Initiators.
`(a) NBE-CH2P(oct)2 (1, 5 equiv) + Mo(NAr)(CHCMe2Ph)-
`(O-t-Bu)2 (6). A solution of 6 (5 mg, 9 (cid:237)mol) in C6D6 (0.5 mL)
`was added to a solution of 1 (17 mg, 47 (cid:237)mol) in C6D6 (0.5
`mL): 1H NMR (cid:228) 13.2 (m), 12.83 (m), 12.6 (m), 6.04-6.13 (m,
`olefinic, 1), 5.6 (m, ring-open olefin); 31P{1H} NMR (cid:228) 31.4 (s),
`28.4 (s), 21.9 (s), 21.4 (s), -34.9 (s, exo 1), -35.8 (s, endo 1).
`(b) NBE-CH2P(O)(oct)2 (2, 5 equiv). A solution of 6 (5
`mg, 9.1 (cid:237)mol) in C6D6 (0.5 mL) was added to 2 (18 mg, 48
`
`Table 1. Physical Data for Polymers
`% yield
`MW (theory)
`96
`52 500
`98
`61 800
`81
`59 800
`
`98
`
`87
`
`61 500
`
`61 800
`
`(cid:237)mol): 1H NMR (cid:228) 5.6 (br m, ring-open olefin); 31P{1H} NMR (cid:228)
`49.6 (s), 50 (s).
`(c) NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(oct)2 (4, 5 equiv). A solution of 6
`(1.0 mg, 1.8 (cid:237)mol) in C6D6 (0.5 mL) was added to a solution of
`4 (4 mg, 9 (cid:237)mol) in C6D6 (0.2 mL). Monitoring of the reaction
`by 1H NMR indicated complete consumption of monomer
`within 1 h: 1H NMR (cid:228) 5.6 (br m, ring-open olefin); 31P{1H}
`NMR (cid:228) -31.9 (s).
`General Procedure for Polymer Synthesis. The syn-
`thesis of the [MTD]300[NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(oct)2]20 diblock co-
`polymer (see Table 1), is given as an example. (The numerical
`subscripts following the monomer name indicate the number
`of equivalents of a monomer that are added to 1 equiv of the
`alkylidene initiator. Previous studies with these initiators
`have shown that in many cases the number of equivalents
`added approximately equal the actual degree of polymerization
`of the individual blocks21). A solution of Mo(CHCMe2Ph)(NAr)-
`(O-t-Bu)2 6 (1.0 mg, 1.82 (cid:237)mol) in THF (1 mL) was added all
`at once to a rapidly stirred solution of MTD (95 mg, 0.545
`mmol) in THF (7 mL). After 1 h, a solution of NBE-CH2O-
`(CH2)5P(oct)2 (16.4 mg, 36.4 (cid:237)mol) in THF (2 mL) was added,
`and the mixture stirred for 2 h before quenching by addition
`of 3 drops of PhCHO. The solution was stirred for 2 h and
`then reduced in volume to 1 mL and added dropwise to
`degassed MeOH (20 mL). The white solid was collected by
`filtration, washed with MeOH, and dried under high vacuum
`for 24 h to yield 104 mg (93%).
`Extent of Incorporation of CdSe Nanoclusters into
`Polymers.
`In a representative experiment, a solution of
`[MTD]300 (50 mg) in THF (2.0 mL) was added to a solution of
`the nanoclusters (10 mg) in THF (1 mL). The mixture was
`stirred for 1 h and the solvent was removed in vacuo.
`Extraction of the residue with 10 mL of pentane yielded a pale
`orange solution, which was diluted to 2.0 mL. The UV-visible
`spectrum of the solution was measured and the concentration
`of nanoclusters in solution calculated by interpolation against
`a Beer’s law plot for the polymer-free nanoclusters.
`Preparation of Samples for TEM Analysis. Samples
`were prepared from solution-cast films in two different ranges
`of thickness: thin films (< 100 nm) and bulk films (0.1 to 1
`mm). For thin films, typically 0.84 mg (42 (cid:237)L of a 20 mg/mL
`solution) of copolymer in THF was diluted with 1.8 mL of THF.
`A solution of the nanoclusters (170 (cid:237)L of a 1 mg/mL solution
`in THF) was added to give 20% w/w cluster to polymer, and a
`final concentration of 0.05 wt % polymer relative to THF. The
`solution was allowed to equilibrate for 24 h. Films were then
`cast by dropping (cid:24)100 (cid:237)L of the solution onto cleaved mica
`coated with (cid:24)10 nm of evaporated carbon. The rate of solvent
`evaporation from the cast solution was reduced by addition of
`3 mL of THF to the casting chamber, which was covered and
`left to stand. After drying (typically within 24 h) and removing
`from the drybox, pieces of the carbon/polymer composite films
`were floated onto deionized water and picked up with 200 mesh
`copper TEM grids. Film thicknesses were estimated to be in
`the range of 30-50 nm based on their silver interference color
`when floating on water. Thin films were also studied in cross
`section. Sample-containing grids (as prepared above) were
`first coated with approximately 2 nm of evaporated carbon on
`both sides, embedded in MedCast epoxy, and then cured at
`70 °C overnight. The carbon coating simultaneously prevents
`
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`420 Fogg et al.
`
`Macromolecules, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1997
`
`Scheme 1. Routes to Dioctylphosphine- and Phosphine Oxide-Functionalized Norbornene Monomers
`
`swelling of the copolymer film by the uncured epoxy and
`enhances adhesion at the epoxy-specimen interface. Cross
`sections were made by cutting directly through the embedded
`sample/grid in a direction normal to the grid plane using a
`Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome and a diamond knife at
`room temperature. The resulting sections were approximately
`30-50 nm thick. Bulk films were prepared by casting a
`solution of 5 wt % polymer relative to THF into a ceramic
`crucible, covering, and keeping in a drybox until all solvent
`had evaporated (approximately 7 d). The resulting (cid:24)0.5 mm
`thick films were ultramicrotomed to give 50 nm thick sections.
`
`Results
`Synthesis of CdSe Nanoclusters. Nanoclusters
`with a narrow size distribution, electronically passivated
`by a surface layer of P(oct)3 and its oxide, were prepared
`by the method of Murray et al. (eq 1).7 Pyrolysis of
`
`unclear, but the high oxygen-sensitivity of these meas-
`urements requires rigorous exclusion of air in all
`comparative fluorescence experiments conducted under
`initially anaerobic conditions, such as the passivation
`and some of the polymer-incorporation experiments
`described below. Experiments conducted under aerobic
`conditions need only be corrected for volume before
`emission is remeasured, but are limited to immediate
`comparative measurements.
`Monomer Synthesis and Properties. Three classes
`of phosphine-substituted norbornene monomers were
`investigated. One is the commercially available diphos-
`phine NORPHOS, while the other two are dioctylphos-
`phine derivatives of 5-norbornene-2-methanol. (All such
`2-substituted-5-norbornenes will be abbreviated as
`NBE-R throughout the rest of this paper.) The phos-
`phine-containing monomers are the following:
`
`dimethylcadmium and SedP(oct)3 at (cid:24)330 °C in the
`presence of P(oct)3 and molten OdP(oct)3 induces rapid
`and homogeneous nucleation, as indicated by an instan-
`taneous color change from colorless to orange.
`A sharp drop in temperature ((cid:24)100 °C) accompanies
`initial nucleation. Subsequent growth and annealing
`of the initially formed clusters are effected by reheating,
`during which the size of the nanoclusters is monitored
`by visible spectroscopy. The rate of reheating is critical
`to maintaining a narrow size distribution. ˘oo rapid a
`temperature rise permits formation of new nucleation
`sites, while too slow a rate permits aggregation of
`smaller clusters. In either case the principal absorption
`band broadens, and secondary absorption features lose
`definition or disappear altogether. Refinement of the
`size distribution and removal of solvating phosphine/
`phosphine oxide is effected by three cycles of reprecipi-
`tation (beyond which loss of the passivating layer occurs,
`and fluorescence is diminished). Clusters were dried
`in vacuo and stored under N2 in a drybox, as decreased
`fluorescence was found on prolonged exposure of the
`clusters to air in the solid state, or overnight in solution.
`Cluster degradation by oxidation of Se surfaces to SeO2
`on exposure to air has been described in related work.22
`Excellent retention of fluorescence is found for THF
`solutions of CdSe[OdP(oct)3,P(oct)3] nanoclusters made
`up and stored in the drybox for up to 1 week. An
`unexpected complication arising from this protocol is an
`observed increase in fluorescence intensity as air dif-
`fuses into solution. The cause of this increase is still
`
`Routes to 1 and 4 are shown in Scheme 1. NBE-
`CH2Cl and NBE-CH2O(CH2)5Br (3), prepared by reac-
`tion of the norbornyl alcohol precursor with SOCl2 or
`1,5-dibromopentane, respectively, were converted to
`their Grignard derivatives and then treated with
`PCl(oct)2 to generate the desired phosphines. The
`chlorophosphine itself is prepared by acid deamination
`of Et2NP(oct)2.19 All norbornene derivatives are ob-
`tained as mixtures of endo and exo isomers, which are
`not separated. For 1, two singlets are observed by 31P
`NMR in a ratio of (cid:24)4.5:1. The upfield singlet ((cid:228) -35.3)
`is assigned to the exo isomer; the downfield signal ((cid:228)
`-35.7) to the predominant endo species. For 4, in which
`the phosphorus atom is further from the endo/exo
`center, only one 31P NMR signal is observed. The
`phosphine oxides [NBE-CH2P(O)(oct)2, 2; NBE-CH2O-
`(CH2)5P(O)(oct)2, 5], which are readily obtained by H2O2
`oxidation of the corresponding phosphines, generate 31P
`NMR resonances (cid:24)70 ppm downfield from the phos-
`phine signals.
`
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`Macromolecules, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1997
`
`Fabrication of Quantum Dot/Polymer Composites 421
`
`Scheme 2. Sequential Polymerization of MTD and Phosphine- or Phosphine Oxide-Functionalized Norbornene
`Derivatives
`
`Polymer Synthesis. Syntheses of MTD homopoly-
`mers and MTD-NORPHOS diblock copolymer have been
`described.3,15 Homopolymers of MTD are written as
`[MTD]n, where n represents the number of equivalents
`of monomer used per equivalent of initiator. Almost
`certainly they do not have regular structures, but
`probably a mixture of cis and trans double bonds and
`head-to-head, head-to-tail, and tail-to-tail arrangement
`of the repeat unit.8,21 The structure of poly(norbornene)
`blocks derived from an endo/exo mixture of monosub-
`stituted norbornenes is expected to be similarly complex.
`The structures given for the polymers therefore are
`simplified representations.
`Polymerizations were carried out in THF, using
`Mo(CHCMe2Ph)(NAr)(O-t-Bu)2 (6) as the initiator
`(Scheme 2). Diblock copolymers were prepared by
`sequential addition of MTD and the appropriate phos-
`phine-functionalized monomer to the ROMP initiator.
`Polymerizations were terminated by addition of benz-
`aldehyde, cleaving the polymer chain from the metal
`in a Wittig-like reaction. Polymers were precipitated
`by dropwise addition of the concentrated reaction mix-
`ture to degassed methanol and analyzed by GPC. As
`GPC analysis of [MTD]300 typically shows a unimodal
`molecular weight distribution, with a polydispersity
`index (PDI) of 1.03-1.07, this reaction was used as a
`periodic check on initiator stability and performance.
`NMR studies of the reaction of 6 with several equiva-
`lents of NBE-CH2P(oct)2 (1) revealed that 6 was con-
`sumed completely, but 1 was not. Chelation of the
`initially formed alkylidene to give a coordinatively
`saturated, inactive species, one possible structure of
`which is shown in eq 2, was inferred from the appear-
`ance of 31P NMR singlets due to coordinated phosphorus
`
`((cid:228) (cid:24)22, 28). Addition of PMe3 regenerated the two
`singlet resonances near -35 ppm due to free 1 as a
`consequence of displacement of the chelated phosphorus
`(eq 2). In contrast, NMR studies showed that monomers
`2 and 4 (5 equiv) are rapidly and quantitatively poly-
`merized by 6 in C6D6. Alkylidene R proton resonances
`(11.5-11.7 ppm) completely disappeared upon addition
`of monomer, while olefinic norbornene proton reso-
`nances at (cid:24)6.0 ppm were replaced by resonances at
`(cid:24)5.6 ppm for olefinic protons in the olefin formed upon
`opening the norbornene ring. No 31P NMR signals for
`coordinated phosphine or phosphine oxide were ob-
`served.
`The diminished Lewis basicity of the phosphine oxide
`functionality, relative to phosphine, probably prevents
`chelation in the case of 2. For the long-chain phosphine
`monomer 4, entropic factors disfavor chelate formation.
`
`5 of 10
`
`

`

`422 Fogg et al.
`
`Macromolecules, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1997
`
`Table 2. Summary of Data for Clusters Incorporated into Polymers
`
`polymer sample
`
`¢ emissionc
`37 Å clusters
`45 Å clusters
`% uptakea
`b
`¢(cid:236)abs
`4
`3
`2
`33
`[MTD]300
`[MTD]300[NORPHOS]20
`116d
`0
`100
`7
`2
`6
`100
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2P(O)(oct)2]20
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(oct)2]20
`180
`230
`0
`100
`[MTD]300[NBE-CH2O(CH2)5P(O)(oct)2]20
`8
`2
`6
`100
`a Weight fraction of cluster taken up by polymer; initial loading level 20 wt %. b Changes in position of (cid:236)max(nm) relative to free clusters
`given for small (37 Å) clusters. Larger (45 Å) clusters exhibit no shift in any of the polymers examined. c As percent of initial fluorescence
`intensity (of free clusters); measured within 30 min of mixing. d Drops to 5% of initial value within 12 h.
`
`Copolymers of MTD with monomers 2, 4, or5were
`readily prepared by sequential addition of the monomers
`to initiator 6 (Scheme 2). The timescale of polymeri-
`zation for 4 was assessed both from in situ NMR
`experiments and by quenching successive aliquots of a
`reaction with PhCHO for subsequent 1H NMR analysis.
`Formation of the P20 block was found to be complete
`within 1 h.
`Polymerization Results. GPC analysis of [MTD]300
`and [MTD]300[NORPHOS]20 indicated narrow, unimodal
`molecular weight distributions. An unexpected bi-
`modality was observed for the MTD copolymers of 2, 4,
`and 5, with a variable peak ratio, and an Mn ratio of
`(cid:24)5-10:1.
`(Peak ratios and Mn values cannot be pre-
`cisely determined, owing to overlap between the two
`peaks.) The very narrow PDI values for the peaks
`(typically <1.06) imply that two distinct initiator species
`are formed, each giving rise to a living polymer. The
`observed bimodality is not due to an intrinsic rate
`difference between Mo-MTD and Mo-phosphine propa-
`gating species reacting with the phosphine-containing
`monomer, as bimodality is retained on reversing the
`usual order of addition (i.e. adding 4 first, then MTD).
`The involvement of monomer phosphine as a donor
`ligand23 is also improbable; not only would a diminished
`effect be expected for copolymers of 2 and 5 (in which
`the Lewis basicity of the auxiliary donor is much
`attenuated), but a bimodal GPC trace is also found for
`copolymers of MTD and NBE-CH2O(CH2)5Br. Binding
`of Br to the metal is unlikely to be significant, as GP

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket