`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 30
`Entered: November 13, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`INO THERAPEUTICS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-00529
`Patent 8,846,112 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, TINA E. HULSE,
`and ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`David K. Callahan, Kenneth G. Schuler, and Marc N. Zubick
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`Patent Owner filed motions for pro hac vice admission of David K.
`Callahan, Kenneth G. Schuler, and Marc N. Zubick. Papers 24, 26, and 28,
`respectively. The motions are supported by declarations of Messrs. Callahan,
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00529
`Patent 8,846,112 B2
`Schuler, and Zubick, which are attached to the respective motions.1 Page 1 of each
`motion states that Patent Owner has conferred with counsel for Petitioner, and
`Peitioner does not oppose the motion.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`David K. Callahan, Kenneth G. Schuler, and Marc N. Zubick pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for admission of David K. Callahan,
`Kenneth G. Schuler, and Marc N. Zubick pro hac vice are granted.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Sanjay K. Murthy
`sanjay.murthy@klgates.com
`
`Sara Kerrane
`Sara.kerrane@klgates.com
`
`Margaux Nair
`margaux.nair@klgates.com
`
`Maria Doukas
`maria.doukas@klgates.com
`
`
`
`1 We note that while we will accept the Declarations in this instance, the
`Declarations should each be filed as a separate exhibit with its own exhibit
`number. 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a).
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00529
`Patent 8,846,112 B2
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert Steinberg
`bob.steinberg@lw.com
`
`
`Daniel G. Brown
`daniel.brown@lw.com
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
