throbber
LOW-DOSE NITRIC OXIDE THERAPY FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN
`
`LOW-DOSE NITRIC OXIDE THERAPY FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY
`HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN
`
`R
`EESE
`
` S
`, M.D., W. M
` W. W
`, M.D., M
` J. K
`, M.D., T
` H. C
`OUTHGATE
`ICHAEL
`ALKER
`ARSHALL
`UESER
`HOMAS
`LARK
`J
` L. H
`, R.R.T., J
` A. P
`, M.D., B
` J. R
`, M.D., M
` K
`, M.D.,
`ARTIN
`EREZ
`OSE
`UCKABY
`ERYL
`EVERLY
`OY
`ESZLER
` J
` P. K
`, M.D.,
`
` C
` I
` N
` O
` R
` G
`*
`AND
`OHN
`INSELLA
`FOR
`THE
`LINICAL
`NHALED
`ITRIC
`XIDE
`ESEARCH
`ROUP
`
`, M.D.,
`
`A
`BSTRACT
`Background
`Inhaled nitric oxide improves gas
`exchange in neonates, but the efficacy of low-dose
`inhaled nitric oxide in reducing the need for extra-
`corporeal membrane oxygenation has not been es-
`tablished.
`Methods
`We conducted a clinical trial to determine
`whether low-dose inhaled nitric oxide would reduce
`the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in
`neonates with pulmonary hypertension who were
`born after 34 weeks’ gestation, were 4 days old or
`younger, required assisted ventilation, and had hy-
`poxemic respiratory failure as defined by an oxygen-
`ation index of 25 or higher. The neonates who re-
`ceived nitric oxide were treated with 20 ppm for a
`maximum of 24 hours, followed by 5 ppm for no more
`than 96 hours. The primary end point of the study
`was the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`Results
`Of 248 neonates enrolled, 126 were ran-
`domly assigned to the nitric oxide group and 122 to
`the control group. Extracorporeal membrane oxygen-
`ation was used in 78 neonates in the control group (64
`percent) and in 48 neonates in the nitric oxide group
`(38 percent) (P=0.001). The 30-day mortality rate in
`the two groups was similar (8 percent in the control
`group and 7 percent in the nitric oxide group). Chron-
`ic lung disease developed less often in neonates treat-
`ed with nitric oxide than in those in the control group
`(7 percent vs. 20 percent, P=0.02). The efficacy of ni-
`tric oxide was independent of the base-line oxygena-
`tion index and the primary pulmonary diagnosis.
`Conclusions
`Inhaled nitric oxide reduces the ex-
`tent to which extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
`is needed in neonates with hypoxemic respiratory
`failure and pulmonary hypertension. (N Engl J Med
`2000;342:469-74.)
`©2000, Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`P
`
`ERSISTENT pulmonary hypertension is
`common in neonates with respiratory fail-
` It is characterized by pulmonary hy-
`ure.
`1,2
`pertension and extrapulmonary right-to-left
`shunting across the foramen ovale and ductus arte-
`riosus. In many cases, the disease progressively wor-
`sens, becoming refractory to treatment.
`3-5
`When other therapies fail, neonates are treated with
` This ther-
`extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`3-5
`apy improves survival in neonates with respiratory
`failure,
` but its administration is labor-intensive and
`6-8
`costly and necessitates large amounts of blood prod-
`
`ucts. The mortality rate in neonates treated with extra-
`corporeal membrane oxygenation is 15 to 20 percent,
`and 10 to 20 percent of the neonates who survive
`have substantial developmental delay.
`7-12
`Nitric oxide is produced in vascular endothelial cells
`and plays an important part in increasing blood flow
`to the lungs after birth.
` Exogenously adminis-
`13-17
`tered nitric oxide causes selective pulmonary vasodil-
`atation in newborn lambs,
` and the administration
`13
`of low doses of nitric oxide causes sustained improve-
`ment in gas exchange in neonates.
` However, the ef-
`18
`ficacy of low-dose inhaled nitric oxide in reducing
`the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has
`not been established. This study was undertaken to
`determine whether low-dose inhaled nitric oxide re-
`duces the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygena-
`tion in neonates with pulmonary hypertension.
`
`METHODS
`
`Study Subjects
`We studied 248 neonates who were born after 34 weeks’ ges-
`tation, were 4 days old or younger, required assisted ventilation,
`and had an oxygenation index of 25 or higher. The oxygenation
`index was calculated as the mean airway pressure times the frac-
`tion of inspired oxygen times 100, divided by the partial pressure
`of arterial oxygen. The neonates had clinical or echocardiographic
`evidence of pulmonary hypertension without structural heart dis-
`ease. Clinical evidence of pulmonary hypertension was defined as
`a difference of 5 percent between preductal and postductal oxy-
`gen saturation or recurrent (more than two) decreases in arterial
`oxygen saturation (to less than 85 percent) in a period of 12 hours
`despite optimal treatment of lung disease. Echocardiographic ev-
`idence of pulmonary hypertension was defined as an estimated peak
`systolic pulmonary-artery pressure that was higher than 35 mm Hg
`or more than two thirds of the systemic systolic pressure as indi-
`cated by a tricuspid regurgitant jet, a right-to-left ductus arterio-
`sus shunt, or a right-to-left atrial-level shunt. In addition, we con-
`sidered as study candidates neonates in whom extreme alkalosis
`(a pH higher than 7.55) was required to maintain a partial pres-
`sure of arterial oxygen of more than 60 mm Hg.
`
`From the Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
`(R.H.C.); the Division of Neonatology, Carolinas Medical Center, Char-
`lotte, N.C. (T.J.K.); the Department of Neonatology, Greenville Hospital
`System, Greenville, S.C. (M.W.W.); Medical University of South Carolina,
`Charleston (W.M.S.); Egleston Children’s Hospital, Atlanta (J.L.H.); Ar-
`nold Palmer Hospital, Orlando, Fla. (J.A.P.); the Department of Pediatrics,
`Emory University, Atlanta (B.J.R.); the Division of Neonatology, George-
`town University Hospital, Washington, D.C. (M.K.); and the University of
`Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (J.P.K.). Address reprint requests to
`Dr. Clark at Pediatrix Medical Group, 1301 Concord Terr., Sunrise, FL
`33323, or at reese_clark@mail.pediatrix.com.
`*The members of the Clinical Inhaled Nitric Oxide Research Group are
`listed in the Appendix.
`
`Volume 342 Number 7
`

`
`469
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at REPRINTS DESK INC on October 22, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Ex. 2031-0001
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Pre-enrollment treatment with high-frequency ventilation (model
`3100A, SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, Calif.) or surfactant was en-
`couraged. Neonates were not eligible for the study if extracorpo-
`real membrane oxygenation was urgently needed for refractory
`hypotension (a mean blood pressure lower than 35 mm Hg) or
`profound hypoxemia (a partial pressure of arterial oxygen lower
`than 30 mm Hg) or if they had a lethal congenital anomaly, a
`substantial bleeding diathesis, active seizures, or a history of severe
`asphyxia. The study was approved by the institutional review board
`at each study site, and written informed consent was obtained
`from a parent or guardian.
`
`Randomization
`To balance the distribution of pulmonary-disease diagnoses in
`the two treatment groups, each neonate was assigned to one of
`five diagnostic categories and then randomly assigned to treatment.
`The diagnostic categories were the meconium aspiration syndrome,
`which was diagnosed on the basis of a history of meconium-stained
`amniotic fluid and abnormal results on chest radiography; pneu-
`monia, with two or more risk factors for sepsis and no history that
`suggested lung immaturity (the risk factors for sepsis were maternal
`chorioamnionitis, maternal fever, positive vaginal culture for group
`B streptococcus, a white-cell count of more than 30,000 cells per
`cubic millimeter or less than 5000 cells per cubic millimeter, a ratio
`of immature to total neutrophils of more than 0.2, a serum C-reac-
`tive protein concentration of more than 2 µg per milliliter, hypo-
`tension that required vasopressor support, and coagulopathy); the
`respiratory distress syndrome, with fewer than two risk factors for
`sepsis, a history that suggested lung immaturity, and a chest radio-
`graph that had a reticulogranular appearance; lung hypoplasia syn-
`dromes, which were diagnosed on the basis of the presence of a
`congenital diaphragmatic hernia, a history of prolonged oligohy-
`dramnios, or hydrops fetalis; and idiopathic persistent pulmonary
`hypertension, which required a clinical diagnosis of pulmonary hy-
`pertension and a chest radiograph showing little or no lung disease.
`Cards on which treatment assignments were written were ran-
`domly ordered (shuffled by hand three times) at Emory University
`in Atlanta and placed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes
`in blocks of eight for diagnostic-category strata 1, 2, and 3 and in
`blocks of four for strata 4 and 5; the number in each block reflected
`the anticipated frequencies of diagnoses. Notebooks in which the
`numbered envelopes were stored were sent to each study site.
`After the attending physician obtained consent, a respiratory
`therapist was told the neonate’s diagnostic stratum and identified
`the appropriate sequentially ordered envelope. The therapist then
`set up the system of treatment delivery, completed the basic in-
`formation on the randomization card, and mailed the card to the
`center that coordinated the study. The study coordinator at the
`coordinating center monitored the order in which the treatment
`cards were used.
`Neither the physicians nor the nurses were told the treatment
`assignments. Respiratory therapists directed treatment and made
`adjustments to keep the concentration of nitric oxide within the
`prescribed range (±10 percent of the target dose). In the first 36
`neonates enrolled, the delivery systems for the two treatment
`groups were identical. The neonates assigned to the control group
`were treated by continuing the flow of oxygen without initiating
`the administration of nitric oxide. In the remaining 212 neonates,
`nitrogen (delivered through the INO Delivery System, Ohmeda,
`Madison, Wis.) was used as the control to improve the masking
`of the treatment assignment. The gas tank and monitor readouts
`were covered so that the tank and the monitored values for nitric
`oxide and nitrogen dioxide could not be seen.
`
`Treatment Guidelines and Delivery of Gas
`In the first 18 neonates in the treatment group, nitric oxide gas
`(Scott Medical Products, Plumstead, Pa.) was delivered from a
`450-ppm cylinder. Nitric oxide was introduced into the afferent
`limb of the ventilator circuit near the endotracheal tube, thus mix-
`ing with the fixed flow of gas in the ventilator circuit. The flow
`
`470
`

`
`Febr uar y 17, 2000
`
`was adjusted to yield the assigned concentrations of nitric oxide.
`Nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide were measured with electrochem-
`ical monitors (Pac II nitric oxide monitor and model 190 nitrogen
`dioxide monitor, Drager, Chantilly, Va.). For the 108 remaining ne-
`onates in the nitric oxide group, nitric oxide gas (INO Therapeu-
`tics, Port Allen, La.) was delivered from an 800-ppm cylinder. The
`control subjects received 100 percent nitrogen (Ohmeda, BOC
`Gases, Murray Hill, N.J.). The study gas (nitrogen or nitric oxide)
`was delivered (with the INO Delivery System) into the inspirato-
`ry flow of the ventilator circuit. The device measured the flow of
`gas in the ventilator circuit, and a mass-flow controller added study
`gas to the ventilator circuit to create the desired concentration. The
`device continuously sampled gas from the endotracheal side-port
`adapter and measured oxygen, nitric oxide, and nitrogen dioxide
`with electrochemical monitors. Inhaled nitric oxide and nitrogen
`had a similar effect on the fraction of inspired oxygen (reducing
`the value to 0.98).
`19
`The administration of the study gas (nitrogen or nitric oxide)
`was started at 20 ppm, and this amount was continued for four
`hours. At four hours, arterial-blood gases and methemoglobin were
`measured. The dose was decreased to 5 ppm if the neonate’s con-
`dition was stable, the partial pressure of arterial oxygen was at least
`60 mm Hg, and the pH was 7.55 or lower. If these criteria were
`not met, the administration of study gas was maintained at 20 ppm,
`and the neonate was evaluated every 4 hours until the criteria were
`met or the neonate had been treated for 24 hours. During the
`first 24 hours, the dose of study gas could be returned to 20 ppm
`if the neonate’s partial pressure of arterial oxygen fell below 60
`mm Hg when the fraction of inspired oxygen was 1.0. After 24
`hours of treatment, the dose was decreased to 5 ppm. Treatment
`was continued at 5 ppm until the fraction of inspired oxygen was
`less than 0.7, the neonate had been treated for 96 hours, or the
`neonate was seven days old, whichever came first.
`If the neonate did not tolerate the decreased dose at 24 hours
`or if at 96 hours the study gas could not be discontinued, the
`treatment was considered a failure. If a clinical decision was made
`to proceed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the study
`gas was continued until it was started.
`Methemoglobin was measured at base line and at 4, 24, and 96
`hours while the neonate was receiving the study gas. The concen-
`tration of study gas was reduced by half if the neonate had a met-
`hemoglobin value of more than 4 percent or a nitrogen dioxide
`concentration of more than 5 ppm, and the administration of the
`study gas was discontinued if these values did not become normal.
`We aimed to achieve the following blood gas values in the ne-
`onates: a partial pressure of arterial oxygen of 60 to 100 mm Hg;
`a partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of 25 to 30 mm Hg and
`a pH of 7.40 to 7.55 in neonates with a response to alkalosis; and a
`partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of 35 to 45 mm Hg and
`a pH of 7.35 to 7.45 in neonates with no response to alkalosis.
`The target mean blood pressure was 45 to 60 mm Hg.
`
`Criteria for Discontinuing Treatment in the Study
`Treatment was discontinued if the neonate was successfully
`weaned from the study gas, met the criteria for treatment failure,
`or met the criteria for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`Neonates who met the criteria for treatment failure were not au-
`tomatically treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`The criteria for the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
`were an oxygenation index of more than 40 on three of five meas-
`urements performed at least 30 minutes apart; a partial pressure
`of arterial oxygen lower than 40 mm Hg for 2 hours; or progres-
`sive hemodynamic deterioration (a mean blood pressure below
`35 mm Hg). The decision to use extracorporeal membrane oxy-
`genation was made by the attending physician and by the consult-
`ing team for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
`
`Study End Points
`Our primary hypothesis was that the use of extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation would be the same in neonates treated with
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at REPRINTS DESK INC on October 22, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Ex. 2031-0002
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LOW-DOSE NITRIC OXIDE THERAPY FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN
`
`nitric oxide and those not treated with nitric oxide. Our second-
`ary hypotheses were that the two groups would have the same im-
`provement in the ratio of arterial oxygen to alveolar oxygen, the
`same incidence of short-term complications (hypotension, methe-
`moglobinemia, and deterioration in gas exchange), the same inci-
`dence of long-term complications (chronic lung disease and neu-
`rologic handicaps), and the same incidence of death. The results
`presented here are for follow-up at 30 days; the results of follow-
`up at 1 year are being collected now.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`We evaluated categorical variables using two-tailed chi-square and
`Fisher’s exact tests. Continuous variables were compared with use
`of a two-tailed t-test or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Ranked data were
`assessed with the two-tailed Kruskal–Wallis test. We compared
`changes over time in the two groups of neonates with regard to gas
`exchange, methemoglobin values, and nitrogen dioxide concentra-
`tions, using analysis of variance for repeated measures. We used a
`multivariate logistic-regression analysis to evaluate the independent
`effects of the following covariates on the use of extracorporeal
`membrane oxygenation and the occurrence of chronic lung disease:
`treatment group, sex, surfactant treatment, support with high-fre-
`quency ventilation, air leak (pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial
`emphysema, or pneumomediastinum) at study entry, age at study
`entry, primary pulmonary diagnosis, and oxygenation index.
`
`RESULTS
`Base-Line Characteristics
`Two hundred forty-eight neonates were enrolled
`in the study; 126 were assigned to the nitric oxide
`group, and 122 to the control group. The base-line
`characteristics of the two treatment groups were sim-
`ilar, with the exception of prenatal care before the
`third trimester and the presence of an air leak before
`enrollment (Table 1). However, there were no differ-
`ences in obstetrical complications, and all air leaks
`were stabilized before enrollment.
`As compared with the nitric oxide group, the con-
`trol group had a higher mean (±SD) blood pressure
`(55±12 mm Hg vs. 51±11 mm Hg, P=0.02) and
`a lower partial pressure of arterial oxygen (58±42
`mm Hg vs. 72±64 mm Hg, P=0.05) (Table 2).
`However, the mean level of pressor support and the
`severity of hypoxemia, assessed by the oxygenation
`index, were similar in the two groups (Tables 1 and 2).
`There were no differences between the two groups
`in the incidence of echocardiographic evidence of
`pulmonary hypertension.
`
`Deviations from the Protocol
`Two neonates assigned to the control group were
`treated with nitric oxide; both were included in the
`control group in an intention-to-treat analysis. There
`were 21 deviations from the protocol. In 12 neonates,
`an oxygenation index higher than 25 at base line was
`not documented adequately. Three neonates had par-
`tial pressures of arterial oxygen that were lower than
`30 mm Hg at base line and thus fulfilled the criteria
`for exclusion because of their urgent need for extra-
`corporeal membrane oxygenation. Two neonates did
`not have pulmonary hypertension. Four other neo-
`nates should not have been enrolled in the study, be-
`
`T
`
`ABLE
`
` 1.
`
`B
`
`ASE
`
`-L
`
`INE
`
` C
`
`HARACTERISTICS
`
`
`
`OF
`
`
`
`THE
`
` S
`TUDY
`
` S
`
`UBJECTS
`
`.*
`
`C
`HARACTERISTIC
`
`Prenatal care before third trimester —
`no. (%)
`Birth weight — kg
`Male sex — no. (%)
`Referred from another hospital —
`no. (%)
`Race or ethnic group — no. (%)
`Non-Hispanic black
`Hispanic
`Non-Hispanic white
`Primary pulmonary diagnosis — no. (%)
`Meconium aspiration syndrome
`Pneumonia
`Idiopathic pulmonary hypertension
`Respiratory distress syndrome
`Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
`Pulmonary hypoplasia
`Lung disease — no. (%)†
`None
`Mild
`Moderate
`Severe
`Air leak before enrollment — no. (%)
`Drugs used before enrollment —
`no. (%)
`Surfactant
`Sodium bicarbonate
`Vasopressors (dopamine, dobutamine,
`and epinephrine)
`Age at enrollment — hr
`
`C
`ONTROL
`G
`ROUP
`(N=122)
`
`N
` O
`XIDE
`ITRIC
`G
`ROUP
`(N=126)
`
`P
`V
`ALUE
`
`101 (83)
`
`116 (92)
`
`0.02
`
`3.3±0.6
`73 (60)
`83 (68)
`
`3.3±0.5
`60 (48)
`92 (73)
`
`41 (34)
`14 (11)
`67 (55)
`
`42 (34)
`26 (21)
`25 (20)
`11 (9)
`18 (15)
`0
`
`10 (8)
`31 (25)
`57 (47)
`24 (20)
`29 (24)
`
`49 (39)
`10 (8)
`67 (53)
`
`43 (34)
`26 (21)
`32 (25)
`11 (9)
`13 (10)
`1 (1)
`
`16 (13)
`33 (26)
`51 (40)
`26 (21)
`16 (13)
`
`52 (43)
`89 (73)
`109 (89)
`
`43 (34)
`97 (77)
`110 (87)
`
`0.59
`0.06
`0.38
`
`0.38
`
`0.80
`
`0.50
`
`0.03
`
`0.19
`0.47
`0.86
`
`28±17
`
`28±20
`
`0.77
`
`*Plus–minus values are means ±SD.
`†The severity of lung disease was determined on the basis of chest radi-
`ography. None indicates no radiographic signs of lung disease; mild indi-
`cates minimal streaky infiltrates or reticulogranular changes with easily vis-
`ualized borders of the heart and diaphragm; moderate indicates diffuse
`infiltrates or reticulogranular changes with obscure but visible borders of
`the heart and diaphragm; and severe indicates diffuse infiltrates with bor-
`ders of the heart and diaphragm that were difficult to visualize.
`
`cause they had congenital heart disease, seizures, an
`estimated gestational age of less than 34 weeks, or a
`lethal anomaly (an inoperable cystic hygroma).
`
`Primary Outcome
`The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
`was less common in the nitric oxide group than in the
`control group (38 percent vs. 64 percent, P=0.001)
`(Table 3). This was true in all pulmonary diagnostic
`groups except neonates with congenital diaphrag-
`matic hernia (Table 4). In the neonates treated with
`extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the median
`time from the start of treatment to the start of ex-
`tracorporeal membrane oxygenation was similar in the
`two groups (5 hours in the control group [range, 1 to
`86] and 9 hours in the nitric oxide group [range, 2 to
`150]). Eight neonates (three in the control group and
`
`Volume 342 Number 7
`

`
`471
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at REPRINTS DESK INC on October 22, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Ex. 2031-0003
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`T
`
`ABLE
`
` 2.
`
`B
`
`ASE
`
`-L
`
`INE
`
` V
`
` S
`ENTILATORY
`S
`.*
`UBJECTS
`
`TATUS
`
`
`
`OF
`
`
`
`THE
`
` S
`
`TUDY
`
`
`
`N
` O
`XIDE
`ITRIC
`G
`ROUP
`(N=126)
`
`P
`V
`ALUE
`
`severe chronic lung disease. The other two neonates
`who died had contraindications to treatment with
`extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: one had un-
`controlled bleeding, and the other had an inopera-
`ble cystic hygroma.
`
`V
`ARIABLE
`
`Receiving high-frequency oscillation —
`no. (%)
`Receiving conventional mechanical
`ventilation — no. (%)
`
`FiO
`2
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value
`Peak pressure†
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — cm of water
`Pressure amplitude‡
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — cm of water
`Rate for high-frequency oscillation
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — Hz
`Rate for conventional mechanical
`ventilation
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — breaths/min
`Mean airway pressure
`High-frequency oscillation
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — cm of water
`Conventional mechanical ventilation
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — cm of water
`Arterial-blood gas values
`pH
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value
`PaO
`2
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — mm Hg
`PaCO
`2
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value — mm Hg
`Oxygenation index§
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean value
`
`C
`ONTROL
`G
`ROUP
`(N=122)
`
`72 (59)
`
`62 (49)
`
`46 (38)
`
`59 (47)
`
`118 (97)
`1.0±0.03
`
`125 (99)
`1.0±0.03
`
`46 (38)
`33±7
`
`69 (57)
`42±11
`
`70 (57)
`10±1
`
`59 (47)
`33±7
`
`62 (49)
`42±11
`
`62 (49)
`10±2
`
`0.10
`
`0.10
`
`0.64
`
`0.64
`
`0.94
`
`0.27
`
`46 (38)
`57±13
`
`59 (47)
`58±14
`
`0.63
`
`69 (57)
`20±4
`
`43 (35)
`16±3
`
`62 (49)
`20±4
`
`55 (44)
`15±4
`
`114 (93)
`7.44±0.1
`
`119 (94)
`7.45±0.1
`
`113 (93)
`58±42
`
`113 (93)
`36±12
`
`107 (88)
`41±21
`
`119 (94)
`72±64
`
`119 (94)
`35±13
`
`111 (88)
`37±24
`
`0.72
`
`0.21
`
`0.35
`
`0.05
`
`0.68
`
`0.17
`
`*Values are not included for neonates who were receiving manual venti-
`lation at base line or for whom blood gas values were obtained after the
` denotes fraction of inspired oxygen, PaO
` partial
`start of treatment. FiO
`2
`2
`pressure of arterial oxygen, and PaCO
` partial pressure of arterial carbon
`2
`dioxide. Plus–minus values are means ±SD.
`†These values are for neonates who were receiving conventional venti-
`lation.
`‡These values are for neonates who were receiving high-frequency oscil-
`lation.
`§The oxygenation index was calculated as the mean airway pressure
`times the fraction of inspired oxygen times 100, divided by the partial pres-
`sure of arterial oxygen.
`
`five in the nitric oxide group) met the criteria for ex-
`tracorporeal membrane oxygenation but did not re-
`ceive it. All survived to discharge, and chronic lung
`disease did not develop in any of them. Four neo-
`nates who were not treated with extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation died. Two died after prolonged
`assisted ventilation; one of these neonates had ade-
`noviral bronchiolitis obliterans, and the other had
`
`472
`

`
`Febr uar y 17, 2000
`
`Secondary Outcomes
`Twenty-three neonates died before discharge: 13
`in the control group and 10 in the nitric oxide group
`(P=0.82). There were no differences between the
`two groups in terms of the cause of death.
`After one hour of treatment, the ratio of arterial
`to alveolar oxygen increased more in the nitric oxide
`group than in the control group (by 0.10±0.14 vs.
`0.05±0.13, P=0.02). There was no difference be-
`tween the two groups with regard to ventilator set-
`tings, heart rate, mean blood pressure, or level of
`dopamine support during the first four hours of
`treatment.
`Thirty neonates had chronic lung disease (as de-
`termined by the need for supplemental oxygen at 30
`days). Nineteen neonates died before 30 days of age.
`In the group of 224 survivors for whom data were
`available, the incidence of chronic lung disease was
`lower in the neonates treated with nitric oxide than
`in the neonates in the control group (7 percent vs.
`20 percent, P=0.02).
`Among the survivors, there was no difference be-
`tween the two treatment groups with regard to age
`at discharge, age at extubation, or duration of extra-
`corporeal membrane oxygenation. Neurologic abnor-
`malities occurred at the same rate in the two groups
`(Table 3).
`The use of nitric oxide independently affected both
`the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and
`the occurrence of chronic lung disease. A high oxy-
`genation index, assignment to the control group, and
`a diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia were
`all associated with the use of extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation. The most important factor that
`affected the development of chronic lung disease was
`the diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The
`oxygenation index and the presence of an air leak
`before enrollment in the study were not independ-
`ent predictors of chronic lung disease.
`
`DISCUSSION
`We found that the administration of low doses of
`nitric oxide reduced the use of extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation and decreased the need for sup-
`plemental oxygen at 30 days in neonates with hy-
`poxemic respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary
`hypertension. We stratified the neonates in both
`groups according to the diagnosis in order to assess
`the relative efficacy of treatment across diagnostic
`groups and to minimize the effect of underlying dis-
`ease as a confounding variable. Our results confirm
`the findings of the Neonatal Inhaled Nitric Oxide
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at REPRINTS DESK INC on October 22, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 2000 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Ex. 2031-0004
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LOW-DOSE NITRIC OXIDE THERAPY FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN
`
`TABLE 3. OUTCOME ANALYSIS.*
`
`T
`
`ABLE
`
` M
` E
`
` R
` R
` 4.
`EMBRANE
`XTRACORPOREAL
`OF
`ISK
`ELATIVE
`O
` A
`
` D
`.
`CCORDING
`XYGENATION
`TO
`IAGNOSIS
`
`
`
`CONTROL
`GROUP
`(N=122)
`
`NITRIC OXIDE
`GROUP
`(N=126)
`
`P
`VALUE
`
`D
`IAGNOSIS
`
`OUTCOME
`
`Received extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation
`Intention-to-treat analysis —
`no./total no. (%)
`Neonates with no protocol
`violations — no./total no. (%)
`Died before 30 days of age — no. (%)
`Died before discharge — no. (%)
`Died before discharge or received
`extracorporeal membrane
`oxygenation — no. (%)
`Length of stay in the hospital for
`survivors
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean no. of days
`Duration of assisted ventilation for
`survivors
`Neonates assessed — no. (%)
`Mean no. of days
`Pulmonary outcome in survivors
`Were receiving supplemental oxygen
`at 30 days — no./total no. (%)†
`Received supplemental oxygen
`after discharge — no./total
`no. (%)†
`Intraventricular hemorrhages (more
`than two) or infarct — no. (%)
`Seizures — no. (%)
`
`78/122 (64)
`
`48/126 (38)
`
`0.001
`
`74/116 (64)
`
`43/111 (39)
`
`0.001
`
`10 (8)
`13 (11)
`80 (66)
`
`9 (7)
`10 (8)
`50 (40)
`
`0.40
`0.82
`0.001
`
`104 (85)
`29±23
`
`113 (90)
`25±15
`
`0.09
`
`109 (89)
`12±10
`
`116 (92)
`11±7
`
`0.40
`
`22/110 (20)
`
`8/114 (7)
`
`0.02
`
`12/107 (11)
`
`6/113 (5)
`
`0.14
`
`8 (7)
`
`1 (1)
`
`4 (3)
`
`1 (1)
`
`0.34
`
`0.49
`
`*Plus–minus values are means ±SD.
`†Data were missing for five neonates (two in the control group and three
`in the nitric oxide group); these neonates were transported back to the re-
`ferring hospitals, so data were not available at 30 days.
`
`Study that nitric oxide is effective across a broad range
` The only exception was neonates with
`of diagnoses.
`20
`congenital diaphragmatic hernia, in whom nitric ox-
`ide did not reduce the use of extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation or improve the outcome.
`21
`The most important difference between our trial
`and previous studies is that we used a low dose of in-
`haled nitric oxide for a limited amount of time (a max-
`imum of 96 hours). Other trials have used higher
`doses (80 ppm) for longer periods (as long as two
` By limiting the duration of treatment,
`weeks).
`19,20,22
`we hoped to avoid delaying extracorporeal mem-
`brane oxygenation beyond the point at which its ef-
`ficacy might be reduced. Our data, combined with
`the results of previous studies, suggest that this ap-
`proach is effective. In the Neonatal Inhaled Nitric
`Oxide Study, neonates who did not have a response
`to 20 ppm of nitric oxide rarely had a response to
`80 ppm.
` The median duration of successful treat-
`20
`ment in our study was 44 hours, and all but two ne-
`onates were weaned from nitric oxide by 96 hours.
`The potentially toxic effects of inhaled nitric oxide
`at high doses include decreased platelet aggregation,
`15
`
` R
`R
`ISK
`ELATIVE
`(95% CI)*
`
`E
`XTRACORPOREAL
` O
`M
`EMBRANE
`XYGENATION
` OXIDE
`CONTROL
`NITRIC
`GROUP
`GROUP
`=122)
`(
`(N=126)
`N
`
`no./total no. (%)
`
`Meconium aspiration syndrome 26/42 (62) 15/43 (35) 0.6 (0.3–0.9)
`Pneumonia
`18/26 (69)
`9/26 (35) 0.5 (0.3–0.9)
`Idiopathic pulmonary hyperten-
`9/25 (36)
`9/32 (28) 0.8 (0.3–1.9)
`sion
`Respiratory distress syndrome
`Congenital diaphragmatic
`hernia
`Pulmonary hypoplasia
`
`0
`
`0/1
`
`3/11 (27) 0.3 (0.1–0.9)
`9/11 (82)
`16/18 (89) 12/13 (92) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
`
`*The relative risk is expressed as the risk of a need for extracorporeal
`membrane oxygenation in the group of neonates treated with nitric oxide
`as compared with the control group. CI denotes confidence interval.
`
`an increased risk of bleeding,
` acute lung injury
`23-25
`as a result of oxidant injury,
` and surfactant dys-
`26-29
`function.
` In our study, none of the neonates had
`30
`high concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, only two had
`high methemoglobin values, and nitric oxide was not
`associated with an increase in the occurrence of in-
`tracranial hemorrhages or chronic lung disease. In
`fact, nitric oxide was associated with a decrease in the
`occurrence of chronic lung disease.
`The strength of the association between treatment
`with nitric oxide and an improved pulmonary out-
`come is demonstrated by the fact that the associa-
`tion remained significant in multivariate and sub-
`group analyses. The reason for this improvement is
`unclear. One possibility is that inhaled nitric oxide
`reduces lung inflammation. Studies in animals sug-
`gest that inhaled nitric oxide may reduce the accu-
`mulation of neutrophils in the lung and the attend-
`ant inflammatory cascade that contributes to acute
` Another possibility is that nitric ox-
`lung injury.
`31-33
`ide reduces ventilator-induced lung injury by improv-
`ing gas exchange and reducing the intensity of re-
`quired ventilatory support.
`In conclusion, low-dose inhaled nitric oxide reduc-
`es the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
`and reduces the occurrence of chronic lung disease in
`neonates with hypoxemic respiratory failure that does
`not result from congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
`
`Supported in part by a grant from INO Therapeutics.
`Dr. Clark has acted as a consultant to INO Therapeutics regarding the
`submission of data to the Food and Drug Administration. He is also the
`principal investigator for the grant that supported this study. Dr. Kinsella
`has acted as a consultant to INO Therapeutics regarding the submission of
`data to the Food and Drug Administration. Mrs. Huckaby has acted as a
`clinical research associate for INO Therapeutics in monitoring this study.
`
`Volume 342 Number 7
`

`
`473
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org at REPRINTS DESK INC on October 22, 2015. For personal use only. No other uses without permission

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket