throbber
Pediatr Cardiol 20:224-226, 1999
`
`@;) Springer-Verlag New Yorio Inc. 1999
`
`Adverse Hemodynamic Effects Observed with Inhaled Nitric Oxide After
`Surgical Repair of Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return
`
`A.M. Rosales,! J. Bolivar,2 R.P. Burke,3 A.C. Chang4
`'Division of Pediatric Medicine, Miami Children's Hospital, 3200 S.W. 60th Court, Suite 104, Miami, FL 33155-4070, USA
`2Division of Critical Care, Miami Children's Hospital, 3200 S.W. 60th Court, Suite 104, Miami, FL 33155-4070, USA
`'Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Miami Children's Hospital, 3200 S.W. 60th Court, Suite 104,
`Miami, FL 33155-4070, USA
`-IDivision of Cardiology, Miami Children's Hospital, 3200 S.W. 60th Court, Suite 104, Miami, Pi. 33155-4070, USA
`
`Abstract. The following is a case report of a l-month-
`old patient who developed adverse hemodynamic sequel-
`ae during the use of nitric oxide (NO) in the postopera-
`tive period for pulmonary hypertension after correction
`of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. At the time
`of diagnosis, the patient had evidence of systemic right
`ventricular pressures estimated by continuous-wave
`Doppler. He was sedated and paralyzed for hyperventi-
`lation in preparation for surgery and underwent pulmo-
`nary vein confluence to left atrial anastomosis. Postop-
`erative pulmonary hypertension was managed by hyper-
`ventilation, sedation, and paralysis until a sudden onset
`of systemic-level pulmonary pressure required NO
`therapy. Satisfactory results were obtained in minutes,
`but a rebound pulmonary hypertension occurred with
`concomitant systemic hypertension and no radiographic
`changes. We suspected left atrial hypertension secondary
`to a sudden increase in pulmonary blood flow to an non-
`compliant left ventricle. Discontinuation of NO resulted
`in stabilization of the hemodynamic profile of the patient
`and he continued to be managed with paralysis, hyper-
`ventilation, and sedation. Based on this experience we
`suggest that NO should be used with caution in patients
`with obstructive lesions at the atrial level prior to surgery
`(mitral valve stenosis and cor triatriatum) or in patients
`with a poorly compliant left ventricle (cardiomyopathy
`and left ventricular dysfunction). These entities are un-
`able to ~olerate a sudden increase in pulmonary blood
`return thus creating paradoxical pulmonary hypertension.
`
`hypertension -
`Key words: Nitric oxide -Pulmonary
`Complications ~ Total anomalous venous connection
`
`Correspondence to: A.C. Chang
`
`Total anomalous pulmonary venous return (TAPVR) is a
`congenital heart defect that accounts for 1 % of all con-
`genital cardiac defects and can be associated with pul-
`monary hypertension secondary to obstruction to the pul-
`monary venous return. The pulmonary artery smooth
`muscle in T APVR can be hypertrophied; its hyperreac-
`tivity is thought to be responsible for the acute rises in
`pulmonary vascular resistance following corrective sur-
`gery. Pulmonary hypertension contributes significantly
`to postoperative morbidity and death and is usually man-
`aged with sedation/paralysis, hyperventilation/hyper-
`oxia, and inotropic support [5, 8].
`Current data support the use of inhaled nitric oxide
`(NO) in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension [4, 9].
`We report a case in which inhaled NO was intended to
`treat pulmonary hypertension following surgical correc-
`tion of T APVR but resulted in unexpected paradoxical
`pulmonary hypertension, most likely secondary to poor
`left heart compliance and excessive pulmonary blood
`flow.
`
`Case Report
`
`MR is a l-month-old white male born to a 39-year-old G2Pl mother
`via an uncomplicated normal spontaneous vaginal delivery with a birth
`weight of 3S60 g. He was admitted to the cardiac intensive car unit with
`a 2-day history of intermittent cyanosis and progressive respiratory
`distress.
`Initial laboratory data showed capillary blood gases as follows:
`pH, 7.20; pC°2' SS Torr; pO2' 11 Torr; and base deficit, -7.4 mEq/Lt.
`Further w6rkup demonstrated a hemoglobin of 7.7 mg/dl, hematocrit of
`23.2%, a platelet count of 88,OOO/UL, and a white blood cell count of
`12,300 cells/ILl. Antibiotic therapy with ampicillin and cefotaxime was
`administered for presumed sepsis. The chest roentgenogram showed
`diffuse interstitial edema with a normal cardiac silhouette. The elec-
`trocardiogram demonstrated right ventricular hypertrophy. The echo-
`cardiogram revealed the diagnosis of mixed TAPVR (three pulmonary
`
`
`
`~~~~
`
`
`
`
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2005
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00529
`
`224
`
`

`

`Rosales et al.: Hemodynamic Complications of Nitric Oxide
`
`.
`
`225
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`~
`
`£Y.f-M--
`
`:;'
`
`27
`
`17
`
`-'\
`
`-L2-
`
`-21-
`
`-!..L-
`
`.--§.l.-
`
`-2L-
`
`-!1.--
`
`..~
`
`, ~/"\II"\\t\;--
`
`-!-
`
`1:00
`
`1:15
`
`1:30
`
`1:45
`
`2:00
`
`2:15
`
`2:30 2:45
`
`mon
`
`Fig. 1. Variation in systolic (S).
`mean (M). and diastolic (D). arterial
`blood pressure (ABP), pulmonary
`artery pressure (PAP), and central
`venous pressure (CVP) before. dur-
`ing, and after inhaled NO (see text
`for descriptions). The solid bar rep-
`resents initiation of inhaled NO treat-
`ment.
`
`into the ponal system, and the
`veins draining infradiaphragmatically
`remaining upper left pulmonary vein draining into the innominate
`vein); in addition, there was evidence of right hean dilatation, tricuspid
`regurgitation, and systemic right ventricular pressure (estimated by
`continuous-wave Doppler).
`The patient was sedated with fentanyl at 7 lI.g/kg/hr and paralyzed
`with vecuronium at 0.6 mgihr; he was also mechanically ventilated
`with the following ventilatory settings: FiO2' 1.0; lMV, 50 per minute;
`PIP, 30 cm; and PEEP, 5 cm. In addition, furosemide (0.4 mgihr),
`dopamine (10 1I.g/kg/min), and prostaglandin (0.02 1I.g/kg/min) were
`also administered.
`The patient underwent corrective surgery with pulmonary vein
`confluence to left atrial anastomosis; the left upper pulmonary vein was
`left intact. Immediately following surgery, the patient remained hemo-
`dynamically stable, supponed with epinephrine (0.05 1I.g/kg/min) and
`dopamine (7.5 1I.g/kg/min). During the first 36 hours following surgery,
`the pulmonary anery pressure ranged between one half and three quar-
`ters of systemic pressure, and the patient was managed with sedation,
`paralysis, and hyperventilation (with an anerial CO2 of 24-30 Torr).
`At about 36 hours in the postoperative period, the patient devel-
`oped sudden onset systemic-level pulmonary pressure with concomi-
`tant systemic hypotension (Fig. I); NO therapy at 80 ppm was promptly
`begun. Prior to NO therapy, anerial blood gas showed the following:
`pH, 7.47; paCO2, 26 Torr; paO2' 83 Torr; and a base deficit equivalent
`to -2.6 mEq/L. During the ensuing 15 minutes, both a decrease in the
`pulmonary anery pressure and an improvement in systemic pressure
`were observed. Anerial blood gas showed no significant changes in pH
`or paCO2, but paO2 increased to 364 Torr.
`These favorable changes were followed by an unexpected rise in
`pulmonary pressure (during a period of 15 minutes) that exceeded
`systemic-level pressure. This "rebound" pulmonary hypenension oc-
`curred with concomitant systemic hypotension and central venous pres-
`
`sure elevation to 16 mmHg. This phenomenon was not associated
`with any change in the administration of NO delivery or in the chest
`roentgenogram. Therapy with NO was discontinued based on the
`rationale
`that this latter episode of pulmonary hypertension may
`have been caused by left atrial hypertension secondary to a sudden
`increase in pulmonary blood flow into a noncompliant left atrium and
`ventricle.
`The suspension of NO therapy resulted in stabilization of the
`patient's hemodynamic profile. The patient remained in sedation!
`paralysis, hyperventilation, and inotropic support for an additional 3
`days. The remaining hospital course was uneventful and he was dis-
`charged 18 days after surgery on oral furosemide.
`
`Discussion
`
`Pulmonary hypertension is one of the leading causes of
`death and morbidity in children after cardiac surgery and
`is associated with preoperative intrinsic pulmonary vas-
`cular abnormality [4]. This abnormal pulmonary vascular
`endothelium is further damaged by cardiopulmonary by-
`pass. Vasodilators such as nitroprusside, tolazoline, or
`prostaglandin/prostacyclin can be effective in treating
`pulmonary hypertension but have unfavorable sequelae,
`such as increased intrapulmonary right-to-left shunting
`(as a result of indiscriminate vasodilatation of pulmonary
`vessels) and systemic hypotension.
`Current therapy for postoperative pulmonary hyper-
`
`~
`I
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2005
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00529
`
`

`

`tension includes the use of NO, a biologic diatomic mol-
`ecule produced in the endothelium from L-arginine by
`the enzyme NO synthetase. Nitric oxide, previously
`known as endothelial-derived relaxing factor, stimulates
`guanylate cyclase to form cGMP, which in turn causes
`relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle by decreasing
`the concentration of free calcium in the smooth muscle
`cytosol [I, II]. Once inhaled, NO acts exclusively on the
`adjacent alveolar unit and is rapidly inactivated by he-
`moglobin, thus avoiding systemic hypotension. In addi-
`tion, since NO manifests its effects in better ventilated
`regions of the lung, it selectively dilates only the pulmo-
`nary vessels in these areas, thus maximizing ventilation!
`perfusion matching. For these reasons, NO is thought to
`be superior to conventional vasodilating agents.
`Previous reports on the use of inhaled NO did not
`disclose adverse hemodynamic profile in patients [4, 9].
`In our patient, the initial response to NO was a signifi~
`cant decrease in pulmonary artery pressure with an in-
`crease in arterial oxygen content, indicating improved
`pulmonary blood flow. The subsequent paradoxical pul-
`monary hypertension was not caused by alteration in the
`administration of NO or by the extrinsic factors (such as
`atelectasis or pneumothorax). We speculated that NO
`induced a pulmonary hypertensive crisis by acutely in-
`creasing pulmonary blood flow and therefore preload
`into a relatively noncompliant left atrium and ventricle.
`The left atrium in T APVR, due to failure of inclusion of
`the common pulmonary veins during embryological de-
`velopment, is 50% of the expected size; although surgi-
`cal repair improves the capacity of the left atrium, its
`compliance remains relatively impaired [6]. With the ad-
`ministration of inhaled NO, the increase in pulmonary
`venous return resulted in left atrial hypertension and sub-
`sequent reflex pulmonary venous and arterial vasocon-
`striction.
`In addition to T APVR after surgery, there are other
`pathophysiologic states in which NO therapy and an in-
`crease in pulmonary blood flow could be detrimental,
`including (I) left atrial obstructive lesions (such as mitral
`stenosis or supramitral ring) prior to relief of obstruction
`and (2) left ventricular dysfunction and/or dilated car-
`diomyopathy with decreased ventricular compliance and
`suboptimal diastolic function [2, 10]. These patients may
`not tolerate an acute increase in preload to the left atrium
`
`Pediatric Cardiology Vol. 20, No.3, 1999
`
`or ventricle and therefore could develop an abrupt in-
`crease in left atrial pulmonary arterial pressures and pul-
`monary edema.
`In summary, while inhaled NO has been found to be
`of benefit in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in
`children with congenital heart disease, paradoxical pul-
`monary hypertension can occur in certain pathophysi-
`ologic states as a result of this therapy.
`
`Acknowledgments. The authors would like to acknowledge the help of
`JoAnn Nieves and Xavier Hernandez with the inhaled nitric oxide
`protocol.
`
`References
`
`I. Anggaard E (1994) Nitric oxide: mediator, murderer, and medi-
`cine. Lancet 343: 1199-1206
`2. Bocchi EA, Bacal F, Auler lunior 10, et aI. (1994) Inhaled nitric
`oxide leading to pulmonary edema in stable severe heart failure.
`Am J Cardiol 74:70-72
`3. Cobanoglu A, Menashe VD (1993) Total anomalous pulmonary
`venous connection in neonates and young infants: repair in the
`current era. Ann Thorac Surg 55:43-48
`4. 10urnois D, Pouard P, Maunat P, et aI. (1994) Inhaled nitric oxide
`as a therapy for pulmonary hypenension after operations for con-
`genital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107: 1129-1135
`5. Lupineni FM, Kulik Tl, Beekmann RH III, Crowley DC, Bove EL
`(1993) Correction of total anomalous pulmonary venous connec-
`tion in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:880-885
`6. Minich LL, Tani LY, Hawkings lA, McGough EC (1995) Abnor-
`mal Doppler pulmonary venous flow patterns in children after
`repaired total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Am J Car-
`diol 75:6O6-{i10
`7. Okamoto K, Sato T, Kurosr M, et al. (1994) Successful use of
`inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of severe hypoxemia in an
`infant with total anomalous pulmonary venous return. Anesthesi-
`ology 81:256-259
`8. Raisher BD, Grant lW, Martin TC, Strauss AW, Spray TL (1992)
`Complete repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection
`in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104:443-448
`9. Robens ill
`lr, Lang P, Bigatello LM, Vlahakes Gl, Zapol WM
`(1993) Inhaled nitric oxide in congenital heart disease. Circulation
`87:447-453
`10. Semigran Ml, Cockrill BA, Kacmarek R, et aI. (1994) Hemody-
`namic effects of inhaled nitric oxide in heart failure. J Am Coli
`Cardiol 24:982-988
`II. Syder SH, Bredt DS (1992) Biological roles of nitric oxide. Sci Am
`266:68-71,74-77
`
`.
`
`I
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2005
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00529
`
`226
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket