throbber
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
`© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
`Published by Elsevier Inc.
`
`Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`ISSN 0735-1097/09/$36.00
`doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.012
`
`Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension
`
`Gérald Simonneau, MD,* Ivan M. Robbins, MD,† Maurice Beghetti, MD,‡
`Richard N. Channick, MD,§ Marion Delcroix, MD, PHD,储 Christopher P. Denton, MD, PHD,¶
`C. Gregory Elliott, MD,# Sean P. Gaine, MD, PHD,** Mark T. Gladwin, MD,††
`Zhi-Cheng Jing, MD,‡‡ Michael J. Krowka, MD,§§ David Langleben, MD,储储
`Norifumi Nakanishi, MD, PHD,¶¶ Rogério Souza, MD##
`
`Clamart, France; Nashville, Tennessee; Geneva, Switzerland; La Jolla, California; Leuven, Belgium; London,
`United Kingdom; Salt Lake City, Utah; Dublin, Ireland; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Shanghai, China;
`Rochester, Minnesota; Montréal, Québec, Canada; Osaka, Japan; and São Paulo, Brazil
`
`The aim of a clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is to group together different manifestations
`
`of disease sharing similarities in pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical presentation, and therapeutic ap-
`
`proaches. In 2003, during the 3rd World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, the clinical classification of PH
`
`initially adopted in 1998 during the 2nd World Symposium was slightly modified. During the 4th World Sympo-
`
`sium held in 2008, it was decided to maintain the general architecture and philosophy of the previous clinical
`
`classifications. The modifications adopted during this meeting principally concern Group 1, pulmonary arterial
`
`hypertension (PAH). This subgroup includes patients with PAH with a family history or patients with idiopathic
`
`PAH with germline mutations (e.g., bone morphogenetic protein receptor-2, activin receptor-like kinase type 1,
`
`and endoglin). In the new classification, schistosomiasis and chronic hemolytic anemia appear as separate enti-
`
`ties in the subgroup of PAH associated with identified diseases. Finally, it was decided to place pulmonary veno-
`
`occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis in a separate group, distinct from but very close to
`
`Group 1 (now called Group 1=). Thus, Group 1 of PAH is now more homogeneous.
`
`(J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:
`
`S43–54) © 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
`
`The classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has gone
`through a series of changes since the first classification was
`proposed in 1973 at an international conference on primary
`PH (PPH) endorsed by the World Health Organization
`(1,2). The initial classification designated only 2 categories,
`
`From the *Centre National de Référence des Maladies Vasculaires Pulmonaires,
`Université Paris-Sud Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France; †Department of
`Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; ‡Pediatric
`Cardiology Unit, Hôpital des Enfants, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva,
`Switzerland; §Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UCSD Medical
`Center, La Jolla, California; 储Center for Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Department of
`Pneumology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; ¶Centre for
`Rheumatology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom; #Department of
`Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;
`**Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital,
`University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; ††Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care
`Medicine, Hemostasis and Vascular Biology Research Institute, University of Pitts-
`burgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; ‡‡Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Shanghai
`Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China; §§Department of Pulmo-
`nary and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
`Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 储 储Center for Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Sir
`Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; ¶¶Division
`of Cardiology and Pulmonary Circulation, Department of Internal Medicine National
`Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan; and the ##Pulmonary Department, Heart
`Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Please see the
`end of this article for each author’s conflict of interest information.
`Manuscript received February 6, 2009; accepted April 15, 2009.
`
`PPH or secondary PH, depending on the presence or
`absence of identifiable causes or risk factors. Twenty-five
`years later, the 2nd World Symposium on Pulmonary
`Arterial Hypertension (PAH) was held in Evian, France.
`The “Evian classification” attempted to create categories of
`PH that shared pathologic and clinical features as well as
`similar therapeutic options (3). This was a much broader,
`more encompassing classification, with 5 major categories; it
`allowed investigators to conduct clinical trials in a well-
`defined group of patients with a shared underlying patho-
`genesis. This has led to multiple clinical trials and the
`approval of 8 different medications worldwide for the
`treatment of PAH.
`The 3rd World Symposium on PAH was held in Venice,
`Italy, 5 years after the Evian conference. At this conference,
`the impact and usefulness of the “Evian classification” was
`reviewed, and modest changes were made. The most nota-
`ble change was to abandon the term PPH in favor of
`idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH); familial
`PAH if there is a family history of PAH; or associated PAH
`if another cause, such as connective tissue disease or human
`immunodeficiency virus (HIV), is present. Although the
`term PPH had become well ingrained in the literature after
`Dresdale first used it in 1951 (4), it had become clear that
`
`043
`
`

`

`S44
`
`Simonneau et al.
`Classification and Epidemiology
`
`JACC Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`June 30, 2009:S43–54
`
`Abbreviations
`and Acronyms
`
`BMPR2 ⴝ bone
`
`morphogenetic protein
`
`receptor type 2
`
`CHD ⴝ congenital heart
`
`disease
`
`CTEPH ⴝ chronic
`
`thromboembolic pulmonary
`
`hypertension
`
`ESRD ⴝ end-stage renal
`
`disease
`
`HIV ⴝ human
`
`immunodeficiency virus
`
`IPAH ⴝ idiopathic
`
`pulmonary arterial
`
`hypertension
`
`OR ⴝ odds ratio
`
`PAH ⴝ pulmonary arterial
`
`hypertension
`
`PAP ⴝ pulmonary arterial
`
`pressure
`
`PCH ⴝ pulmonary capillary
`
`hemangiomatosis
`
`PH ⴝ pulmonary
`
`hypertension
`
`the pathologic changes and re-
`sponse to therapy were similar in
`several other conditions or dis-
`eases. The term “secondary PH”
`had been abandoned at the Evian
`meeting because it was confusing
`and did not help with diagnosis or
`in directing treatment (5) (Table
`1). The other prominent change
`made at the Venice meeting was to
`move pulmonary veno-occlusive
`disease (PVOD) and pulmonary
`capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH)
`from separate categories into a sin-
`gle subcategory of PAH. These 2
`entities have many similarities
`with each other, which will be
`discussed later in this article, as
`well as some similarities with
`PAH. The 2008 4th World Sym-
`posium on PH held in Dana
`Point, California, provided the op-
`portunity to slightly modify the
`previous clinical classifications.
`
`
`
`Venice Clinical Classificationof Pulmonary Hypertension (2003)
`
`Table 1
`
`Venice Clinical Classification
`of Pulmonary Hypertension (2003)
`
`1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
`
`1.1. Idiopathic (IPAH)
`
`1.2. Familial (FPAH)
`
`1.3. Associated with (APAH)
`
`1.3.1. Collagen vascular disease
`
`1.3.2. Congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts
`
`1.3.3. Portal hypertension
`
`1.3.4. HIV infection
`
`1.3.5. Drugs and toxins
`
`1.3.6. Other (thyroid disorders, glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease,
`
`hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, hemoglobinopathies,
`
`myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy)
`
`1.4. Associated with significant venous or capillary involvement
`
`1.4.1. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD)
`
`1.4.2. Pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis (PCH)
`
`1.5. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn
`
`2. Pulmonary hypertension with left heart disease
`
`2.1. Left-sided atrial or ventricular heart disease
`
`2.2. Left-sided valvular heart disease
`
`3. Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases and/or hypoxemia
`
`3.1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
`
`3.2. Interstitial lung disease
`
`3.3. Sleep-disordered breathing
`
`3.4. Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
`
`3.5. Chronic exposure to high altitude
`
`3.6. Developmental abnormalities
`
`4. Pulmonary hypertension owing to chronic thrombotic and/or embolic disease
`
`4.1. Thromboembolic obstruction of proximal pulmonary arteries
`
`4.2. Thromboembolic obstruction of distal pulmonary arteries
`
`POPH ⴝ portopulmonary
`
`Dana Point Classification
`
`4.3. Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism (tumor, parasites, foreign material)
`
`PVR ⴝ pulmonary vascular
`
`resistance
`
`SCD ⴝ sickle cell disease
`
`TRV ⴝ tricuspid
`
`regurgitation jet velocity
`
`hypertension
`
`PPH ⴝ primary pulmonary
`
`hypertension
`
`PVOD ⴝ pulmonary veno-
`
`occlusive disease
`
`During the 4th World Sympo-
`sium on PH held in 2008 in
`Dana Point, California, the con-
`sensus of an international group
`of experts was to maintain the
`general philosophy and organiza-
`tion of the Evian-Venice classi-
`fications. However, in response
`to a questionnaire regarding the
`previous classification, a majority
`of experts (63%) felt that modi-
`fication of the Venice classification was required to accu-
`rately reflect information published over the past 5 years, as
`well as to clarify some areas that were unclear. The current
`Dana Point classification is listed in Table 2, with major
`changes highlighted.
`
`Group 1: PAH
`
`Pulmonary arterial hypertension has been the focus of the
`classification of PH since the first classification in 1973. The
`nomenclature of the subgroups and associated conditions
`has evolved since that time, and additional modifications
`were made in the Dana Point classification.
`1.1./1.2. Idiopathic and heritable PAH. Pulmonary arte-
`rial hypertension may occur in different clinical conditions
`depending on associated diseases. Idiopathic PAH corre-
`sponds to sporadic disease in which there is neither a family
`history of PAH nor an identified risk factor. When PAH
`
`5. Miscellaneous
`
`Sarcoidosis, histiocytosis X, lymphangiomatosis, compression of pulmonary
`
`vessels (adenopathy, tumor, fibrosing mediastinitis)
`
`occurs in a familial context, germline mutations in the bone
`morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) gene, a
`member of the transforming growth factor ␤ signaling
`family, can be detected in approximately 70% of cases (6,7).
`More rarely, mutations in activin receptor-like kinase type
`1, or endoglin, also members of the transforming growth
`factor ␤ signaling family, have been identified in patients
`with PAH, predominantly with coexistent hereditary hem-
`orrhagic telangiectasia. Recently, it has been suggested that
`patients with PAH associated with BMPR2 mutations may
`represent a subgroup of patients with more severe disease
`who are less likely to demonstrate vasoreactivity than those
`with IPAH without BMPR2 mutations (8 –10).
`Because BMPR2 mutations have also been detected in
`11% to 40% of apparently idiopathic cases with no family
`history (11,12), the distinction between idiopathic and
`familial BMPR2 mutations is artificial. All patients with
`BMPR2 mutations have heritable disease, whether the
`patient is the first identified case, possibly with a de novo
`mutation, or other family members were previously diag-
`nosed with PAH. In addition, in 30% or fewer families with
`PAH, no BMPR2 mutation has been identified. Thus, it
`was decided to abandon the term “familial PAH” in the new
`classification and to replace it with the term “heritable
`PAH.” Heritable forms of PAH include IPAH with germ-
`line mutations (mainly BMPR2 but also activin receptor-
`
`044
`
`

`

`JACC Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`June 30, 2009:S43–54
`
`
`
`Updated Clinical Classification ofPulmonary Hypertension (Dana Point, 2008)
`
`Table 2
`
`Updated Clinical Classification of
`Pulmonary Hypertension (Dana Point, 2008)
`
`1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
`
`1.1. Idiopathic PAH
`
`1.2. Heritable
`
`1.2.1. BMPR2
`
`1.2.2. ALK1, endoglin (with or without hereditary hemorrhagic
`
`telangiectasia)
`
`1.2.3. Unknown
`
`1.3. Drug- and toxin-induced
`
`1.4. Associated with
`
`1.4.1. Connective tissue diseases
`
`1.4.2. HIV infection
`
`1.4.3. Portal hypertension
`
`1.4.4. Congenital heart diseases
`
`1.4.5. Schistosomiasis
`
`1.4.6. Chronic hemolytic anemia
`
`1.5 Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn
`
`1=. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) and/or pulmonary capillary
`
`hemangiomatosis (PCH)
`
`2. Pulmonary hypertension owing to left heart disease
`
`2.1. Systolic dysfunction
`
`2.2. Diastolic dysfunction
`
`2.3. Valvular disease
`
`3. Pulmonary hypertension owing to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
`
`3.1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
`
`3.2. Interstitial lung disease
`
`3.3. Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive and obstructive pattern
`
`3.4. Sleep-disordered breathing
`
`3.5. Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
`
`3.6. Chronic exposure to high altitude
`
`3.7. Developmental abnormalities
`
`4. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
`
`5. Pulmonary hypertension with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
`
`5.1. Hematologic disorders: myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
`
`5.2. Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary Langerhans cell
`
`histiocytosis: lymphangioleiomyomatosis, neurofibromatosis, vasculitis
`
`5.3. Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid
`
`disorders
`
`5.4. Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure
`
`on dialysis
`
`Main modifications to the previous Venice classification are in bold.
`
`ALK1 ⫽ activin receptor-like kinase type 1; BMPR2 ⫽ bone morphogenetic protein receptor type
`
`2; HIV ⫽ human immunodeficiency virus.
`
`like kinase 1 or endoglin) and familial cases with or without
`identified germline mutations (13,14). The new category of
`“heritable PAH” does not mandate genetic testing in
`patients with IPAH or in familial cases of PAH. Genetic
`testing, when called for, should be performed as a part of a
`comprehensive program that includes genetic counseling
`and discussion of the risks, benefits, and limitations of such
`testing (15).
`1.3. Drug- and toxin-induced PAH. A number of risk
`factors for the development of PAH have been identified
`and were included in the previous Evian and Venice
`classifications (3,5). Risk factors for PAH include “any
`factor or condition that is suspected to play a predisposing
`or facilitating role in the development of the disease. Risk
`factors may include drugs and chemicals, diseases, or phe-
`notype (age, gender).” Risk factors were categorized as
`definite, very likely, possible, or unlikely, based on the
`“strength of their association with PH and their probable
`causal role.” In the current classification, the categorization
`
`Simonneau et al.
`Classification and Epidemiology
`
`S45
`
`of risk factors and the likelihood of developing PAH have
`been modified. Updated risk factors and associated condi-
`tions for PAH are presented in Table 3. A “definite”
`association is defined as an epidemic, such as occurred with
`appetite suppressants in the 1960s, or large, multicenter
`epidemiologic studies demonstrating an association between
`a drug and PAH. A “likely” association is defined as a
`single-center, case-control study demonstrating an associa-
`tion or a multiple-case series. “Possible” is defined as drugs
`with similar mechanisms of action as those in the “definite”
`or “likely” categories but which have not yet been studied
`(e.g., drugs used to treat attention-deficit disorder). Lastly,
`an “unlikely” association is defined as one in which a drug
`has been studied in epidemiologic studies and an association
`with PAH has not been demonstrated.
`Aminorex, fenfluramine derivatives, and toxic rapeseed
`oil represent the only identified “definite” risk factors for
`PAH (3,5). A recent retrospective analysis of more than 100
`cases of PAH associated with fenfluramine exposure showed
`that this category shares clinical, functional, hemodynamic,
`and genetic features with IPAH, suggesting that fenflura-
`mine exposure represents a potential trigger for PAH
`without influencing its clinical course (16).
`The most recent surveillance study of PH, Surveillance of
`Pulmonary Hypertension in America (SOPHIA), enrolled
`1,335 subjects at tertiary PH centers in the U.S. between
`1998 and 2001 (17). This study confirmed the association of
`fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine intake with the develop-
`ment of PAH. The average monthly number of IPAH cases
`did not change during the study, which was, however,
`conducted after fenfluramine and its derivates had been
`withdrawn from the U.S. market. A novel finding was that
`St. John’s Wort (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, vs. thromboembolic
`PH) and over-the-counter antiobesity agents containing
`phenylpropanolamine (OR: 5.2, vs. thromboembolic PH)
`also increased the risk of developing IPAH.
`The SOPHIA study examined intake of a variety of
`nonselective monoamine reuptake inhibitors, selective sero-
`tonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, and anxiolytics,
`and found no increased risk for developing PAH (17).
`However, a recent case-control study of selective serotonin
`
`
`
`Updated Risk Factors forand Associated Conditions of PAH
`
`Table 3
`
`Updated Risk Factors for
`and Associated Conditions of PAH
`
`Definite
`
`Aminorex
`
`Fenfluramine
`
`Dexfenfluramine
`
`Toxic rapeseed oil
`
`Likely
`
`Amphetamines
`
`L-tryptophan
`
`Methamphetamines
`
`Possible
`
`Cocaine
`
`Phenylpropanolamine
`
`St. John’s Wort
`
`Chemotherapeutic agents
`
`SSRI
`
`Unlikely
`
`Oral contraceptives
`
`Estrogen
`
`Cigarette smoking
`
`PAH ⫽ pulmonary arterial hypertension; SSRI ⫽ selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
`
`045
`
`

`

`S46
`
`Simonneau et al.
`Classification and Epidemiology
`
`JACC Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`June 30, 2009:S43–54
`
`reuptake inhibitor use in pregnant women after 20 weeks of
`gestation showed an increased risk (OR: 6.1) in the off-
`spring of developing persistent PH of the newborn, a form
`of PAH (18). Based on this study, selective serotonin
`reuptake inhibitors may play a role in the development of
`PH, at least in association with pregnancy, and therefore
`they have been reclassified in the “possible” category.
`Amphetamine use represents a “likely” risk factor for
`PAH, although they are rarely taken as a single agent and
`are frequently used in combination with fenfluramine. A
`recent comprehensive retrospective study suggested a strong
`relationship with the use of methamphetamine (inhaled,
`smoked, oral, or intravenous) and the occurrence of IPAH
`(19). Based primarily on the results of this study, metham-
`phetamine use is now considered a “very likely” risk factor
`for the development of PAH. Additional changes in drug-
`and toxin-induced PAH will be discussed later. With the
`exception of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia associ-
`ated with PAH, the first 3 subcategories of Group 1,
`idiopathic, heritable, and drug- and toxin-induced PAH,
`are all associated with the development of isolated pulmo-
`nary arterial diseases.
`1.4.1. PAH associated with connective tissue diseases.
`PAH associated with connective tissue diseases represents
`an important clinical subgroup. The prevalence of PAH has
`been well established only for systemic sclerosis. Two recent
`prospective studies using echocardiography as a screening
`method and right heart catheterization for confirmation
`found a prevalence of PAH of between 7% and 12% (20,21).
`Several
`long-term studies suggest that the outcome of
`patients with PAH associated with systemic sclerosis is
`markedly worse than that of patients with IPAH, despite
`the use of modern therapies.
`Importantly, PAH does not represent the only cause of
`PH in systemic sclerosis. Pulmonary hypertension owing to
`lung fibrosis is also frequent (22), and diastolic left heart
`dysfunction is not uncommon (23). There is also primary
`cardiac involvement in the disease process (24). These
`observations emphasize the importance of a complete eval-
`uation when PH is suspected in patients with systemic
`sclerosis and the need for right heart catheterization to
`confirm the diagnosis of PH and to accurately classify its
`etiology to determine appropriate treatment.
`In systemic lupus erythematosis (25,26) and mixed con-
`nective tissue disease (27,28),
`the prevalence of PAH
`remains unknown but likely occurs less frequently than in
`systemic sclerosis. In the absence of fibrotic lung disease,
`PAH has been reported infrequently in other connective
`tissue diseases such as Sjögren syndrome (29), polymyositis
`(30), or rheumatoid arthritis (31).
`1.4.2. HIV infection. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a
`rare but well-established complication of HIV infection
`(32,33). Epidemiologic data in the early 1990s, a time when
`therapy with highly active antiretroviral therapy was not yet
`available, indicated a prevalence of 0.5% (95% confidence
`interval: 0.10% to 0.50%) (34). The prevalence of HIV-
`
`associated PAH was evaluated more recently and showed a
`stable prevalence of 0.46% (95% confidence interval: 0.32%
`to 0.64%) (35). Human immunodeficiency virus-associated
`PAH has clinical, hemodynamic, and histologic character-
`istics similar to those seen in IPAH. The mechanism for the
`development of PH remains unclear. Because neither the
`virus nor viral DNA has been found in pulmonary endo-
`thelial cells, an indirect action of virus through secondary
`messengers such as cytokines, growth factors, endothelin, or
`viral proteins is strongly suspected.
`Uncontrolled studies suggest that patients with severe
`HIV-associated PAH could benefit from bosentan or long-
`term infusion of epoprostenol (36,37). Interestingly, in a
`substantial number of cases, normalization of pulmonary
`vascular hemodynamics can be obtained with therapy indi-
`cated for PAH; this is very rarely seen in IPAH (38).
`1.4.3. Portopulmonary hypertension. The development
`of PAH in association with elevated pressure in the portal
`circulation is known as portopulmonary hypertension
`(POPH) (39,40). Portal hypertension, rather than the
`presence of underlying liver disease, is the main determining
`risk factor for the development of POPH. Prospective
`hemodynamic studies have shown that 2% to 6% of patients
`with portal hypertension have PH (41,42). Right heart
`catheterization is absolutely mandatory for the definitive
`diagnosis of POPH because several factors may increase
`pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) in the setting of ad-
`vanced liver disease (e.g., high flow associated with the
`hyperdynamic circulatory state and increased pulmonary
`capillary wedge pressure owing to fluid overload and/or
`diastolic dysfunction). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
`is usually normal in these cases. Pathologic changes in the
`small arteries appear identical to those seen in IPAH. A
`recent multicenter case-control study identified 2 risk fac-
`tors for the development of POPH: female sex and auto-
`immune hepatitis (43). Interestingly, hepatitis C infection
`was associated with a decreased risk. A recent, large cohort
`study of POPH showed that long-term prognosis was
`related to the presence and severity of cirrhosis and to
`cardiac function (44).
`1.4.4. Congenital heart diseases. A significant proportion
`of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), in partic-
`ular those with relevant systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, will
`develop PAH if left untreated. Persistent exposure of the
`pulmonary vasculature to increased blood flow, as well as
`increased pressure, may result in pulmonary obstructive
`arteriopathy, which leads to increased PVR that will result
`in shunt reversal. Eisenmenger syndrome is defined as
`CHD with an initial large systemic-to-pulmonary shunt
`that induces progressive pulmonary vascular disease and
`PAH, with resultant reversal of the shunt and central
`cyanosis (45,46). Eisenmenger syndrome represents the
`most advanced form of PAH associated with CHD. The
`histopathologic and pathobiologic changes seen in patients
`with PAH associated with congenital
`systemic-to-
`pulmonary shunts (e.g., endothelial dysfunction of
`the
`
`046
`
`

`

`JACC Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`June 30, 2009:S43–54
`
`Simonneau et al.
`Classification and Epidemiology
`
`S47
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Anatomic-Pathophysiologic Classificationof Congenital Systemic-to-PulmonaryShunts Associated With Pulmonary ArterialHypertension (Modified From Venice 2003)
`
`pulmonary shunts (Table 4) to provide a more detailed
`description of each condition. This anatomic and patho-
`physiologic classification may be too complex to be used in
`clinical practice; however, 4 quite distinct phenotypes can be
`recognized (Table 5).
`1.4.5. Schistosomiasis. Another important modification of
`the new classification is the inclusion of PH associated with
`schistosomiasis in Group 1.
`In the previous classification, this form of PH was
`subcategorized in Group 4 as PH owing to chronic throm-
`botic and/or embolic disease. Embolic obstruction of pul-
`monary arteries by schistosoma eggs was thought to be the
`primary mechanism responsible for the development of PH
`(51). However, more recent publications indicate that PH
`associated with schistosomiasis can have a similar clinical
`presentation to IPAH (52), with similar histologic findings,
`including the development of plexiform lesions (53). The
`mechanism of PAH in patients with schistosomiasis is
`probably multifactorial. It may include POPH, a frequent
`complication of this disease (54), and local vascular inflam-
`mation as a result of impacted schistosoma eggs, whereas
`mechanical obstruction by schistosoma eggs seems to play a
`minor role. PAH associated with schistosomiasis represents
`a frequent form of PAH, especially in countries in which the
`infection is endemic. It is estimated that more than 200
`million people are infected with any of the 3 species of
`schistosoma and that 4% to 8% of patients will develop
`hepatosplenic disease. Data from a recent study based on
`invasive hemodynamics showed that the prevalence of PAH
`in patients with hepatosplenic disease was 4.6%; also im-
`portant was the prevalence of post-capillary hypertension
`(3.0%), reinforcing the need for invasive hemodynamics for
`the proper diagnosis of PAH in schistosomiasis (55).
`1.4.6. Chronic hemolytic anemia. The chronic hemolytic
`anemias represent a new subcategory of PAH; these were
`previously categorized under “other” as conditions associ-
`ated with the development of PAH. Since the Venice
`classification, there has been increasing evidence that PAH
`is a complication of chronic hereditary and acquired hemo-
`lytic anemias, including sickle cell disease (SCD) (56,57),
`thalassemia (58), hereditary spherocytosis (59), stomatocy-
`tosis (60), and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (61).
`Pulmonary hypertension has been described most fre-
`quently in patients with SCD with histologic lesions similar
`
`Table 4
`
`Anatomic-Pathophysiologic Classification
`of Congenital Systemic-to-Pulmonary
`Shunts Associated With Pulmonary Arterial
`Hypertension (Modified From Venice 2003)
`
`1. Type
`
`1.1. Simple pre-tricuspid shunts
`
`1.1.1. Atrial septal defect (ASD)
`
`1.1.1.1. Ostium secundum
`
`1.1.1.2. Sinus venosus
`
`1.1.1.3. Ostium primum
`
`1.1.2. Total or partial unobstructed anomalous pulmonary venous return
`
`1.2. Simple post-tricuspid shunts
`
`1.2.1. Ventricular septal defect (VSD)
`
`1.2.2. Patent ductus arteriosus
`
`1.3. Combined shunts (describe combination and define predominant defect)
`
`1.4. Complex congenital heart disease
`
`1.4.1. Complete atrioventricular septal defect
`
`1.4.2. Truncus arteriosus
`
`1.4.3. Single ventricle physiology with unobstructed pulmonary blood flow
`
`1.4.4. Transposition of the great arteries with VSD (without pulmonary stenosis)
`
`and/or patent ductus arteriosus
`
`1.4.5. Other
`
`2. Dimension (specify for each defect if ⬎1 congenital heart defect)
`
`2.1. Hemodynamic (specify Qp/Qs)*
`
`2.1.1. Restrictive (pressure gradient across the defect)
`
`2.1.2. Nonrestrictive
`
`2.2. Anatomic
`
`2.2.1. Small to moderate (ASD ⱕ2.0 cm and VSD ⱕ1.0 cm)
`
`2.2.2. Large (ASD ⬎2.0 cm and VSD ⬎1.0 cm)
`
`3. Direction of shunt
`
`3.1 Predominantly systemic-to-pulmonary
`
`3.2 Predominantly pulmonary-to-systemic
`
`3.3 Bidirectional
`
`4. Associated cardiac and extracardiac abnormalities
`
`5. Repair status
`
`5.1. Unoperated
`
`5.2. Palliated (specify type of operation[s], age at surgery)
`
`5.3. Repaired (specify type of operation[s], age at surgery)
`
`*Ratio of pulmonary (Qp) to systemic (Qs) blood flow.
`
`pulmonary vasculature) are similar to those observed in
`idiopathic or other associated forms of PAH.
`It has been reported that a large proportion of patients
`with CHD develop some degree of PAH (47– 49). The
`prevalence of PAH associated with congenital systemic-to-
`pulmonary shunts in Europe and North America has been
`estimated to range between 1.6 and 12.5 cases per million
`adults, with 25% to 50% of this population affected by
`Eisenmenger syndrome (50). Following the Dana Point
`meeting,
`it was decided to update the pathologic and
`pathophysiologic classification of CHD with systemic-to-
`
`Clinical Classification of Congenital Systemic-to-Pulmonary Shunts Associated to PAH
`
`Table 5
`
`Clinical Classification of Congenital Systemic-to-Pulmonary Shunts Associated to PAH
`
`A. Eisenmenger syndrome
`
`Includes all systemic-to-pulmonary shunts resulting from large defects and leading to a severe increase in PVR and
`
`a reversed (pulmonary-to-systemic) or bidirectional shunt; cyanosis, erythrocytosis, and multiple organ involvement
`
`are present
`
`B. PAH associated with systemic-to-pulmonary
`
`Includes moderate to large defects; PVR is mildly to moderately increased, systemic-to-pulmonary shunt is still prevalent,
`
`shunts
`
`and no cyanosis is present at rest
`
`C. PAH with small defects
`
`Small defects (usually ventricular septal defects ⬍1 cm and atrial septal defects ⬍2 cm of effective diameter assessed
`
`by echocardiography); clinical picture is very similar to idiopathic PAH
`
`D. PAH after corrective cardiac surgery
`
`Congenital heart disease has been corrected, but PAH is still present immediately after surgery or recurs several months
`
`or years after surgery in the absence of significant postoperative residual lesions
`
`PAH ⫽ pulmonary arterial hypertension; PVR ⫽ pulmonary vascular resistance.
`
`047
`
`

`

`S48
`
`Simonneau et al.
`Classification and Epidemiology
`
`JACC Vol. 54, No. 1, Suppl S, 2009
`June 30, 2009:S43–54
`
`to those found in IPAH, including plexiform lesions in 1
`case series (62). However, the prevalence of PAH in SCD
`is not clearly established. The largest study of patients with
`SCD, which defined PH echocardiographically by the
`presence of tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity (TRV) ⱖ2.5
`m/s, found that 32% of patients had PH (57). However,
`using a TRV ⬎2.5 m/s on echocardiography to define PH
`can lead to a substantial number of false positive cases of PH
`not confirmed by right heart catheterization (35,63). When
`a TRV ⬎3.0 m/s was used, corresponding to an estimated
`systolic PAP of ⬎41 mm Hg, only 9% of the cohort met the
`criteria for PH. Right heart catheterization was carried out
`in only 18 of 63 patients with TRV ⬎2.5 m/s. In this
`subpopulation, PH defined by a mean PAP ⬎25 mm Hg
`was confirmed in 17 patients; however, pulmonary wedge
`pressure was elevated in some patients. A substantial pro-
`portion of patients with SCD have pulmonary venous
`hypertension: 46% in 1 study of 26 patients with SCD and
`PH (64). In addition, some patients present with a hyperki-
`netic state with moderate elevation in mean PAP and
`normal PVR. Thus, although it appears that some patients
`with SCD do develop PAH, the prevalence of PAH in
`SCD is undoubtedly much lower than 32%. Prospective
`epidemiologic studies using echocardiographic screening
`and direct hemodynamic confirmation with right heart
`catheterization in all patients with suspected PH are ongo-
`ing and will evaluate the precise prevalence of PAH in
`SCD. The mechanism of PAH in SCD remains uncertain.
`A probable hypothesis is that chronic hemolysis results in
`high rates of nitric oxide consumption and produces a state
`of resistance to nitric oxide bioactivity (65). Consequently,
`smooth muscle guanosine monophosphate, a potent vaso-
`dilator/antiproliferative mediator, is not activated (66).
`
`Group 1=: PVOD and/or PCH
`
`The conditions of PVOD and PCH are uncommon, but
`they are increasingly recognized as causes of PH (67). In the
`Evian classification,
`these 2 entities were placed in 2
`different groups, both distinct from PAH: PVOD was
`included in the pulmonary venous hypertension category,
`and PCH was included in the heterogeneous group of
`disorders believed to directly affect the pulmonary vascula-
`ture. Pathologic studies indicate, however, that PVOD and
`PCH are often quite similar in terms of changes in the
`pulmonary parenchyma (i.e., pulmonary hemosiderosis, in-
`terstitial edema, and lymphatic dilation) and the develop-
`ment of pulmonary arterial
`intimal fibrosis and medial
`hypertrophy. Similarities in pathologic features and clinica

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket