throbber
1342
`
`Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 1342-1347
`
`The Enzymatic Synthesis of Thiol-Containing Polymers
`to Prepare Polymer-CdS Nanocomposites
`R. Premachandran,† S. Banerjee,† V. T. John,*,† and G. L. McPherson*,‡
`Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Chemistry, Tulane University,
`New Orleans, Louisiana 70118
`
`J. A. Akkara and D. L. Kaplan
`U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command, Natick, Massachusetts 01760
`
`Received August 5, 1996. Revised Manuscript Received March 18, 1997X
`
`Thiol-containing polyphenolics are enzymatically synthesized in the microstructured
`environment of reversed micelles. CdS semiconductor nanocrystallites, also synthesized in
`the water pools of reversed micelles, are then attached to these polymers through binding
`to the sulfhydryl groups. The polymer-CdS nanocomposite thus prepared exhibits
`luminescence characteristic of such quantum dot particles. Passivation of the CdS by the
`polymer suppresses low-energy emissions associated with surface recombinations, while
`slightly enhancing higher energy emissions resulting from the recombinations in the excitonic
`state of the crystallite interior. The polymer-CdS complex is stable in solution, and the
`solid form can be obtained in the morphology of microspheres.
`
`Introduction
`
`Nanometer-size semiconductor particles are of par-
`ticular interest because of their size-dependent photo-
`physical, photochemical, and nonlinear optical proper-
`ties.,1-3 In contrast to the bulk solid, such quantum dot
`particles exhibit quantum effects that arise from the
`spatial confinement of photogenerated charge carriers.
`Quantum dot particles exhibit structured absorption
`and emission with energies characteristic of particle
`size.4-6 Typically, such semiconductor colloids also have
`a high density of surface defect sites.7 The sites cover
`a broad range of energies and structures with many
`defect states existing at midbandgap energies. The
`surface defects are involved in trapping initially pro-
`duced electron-hole pairs, as shown by the fact that
`emission is significantly red-shifted from the absorption
`edge. The existence of different trap states provides
`multiple pathways for radiative and nonradiative re-
`combination.
`Quantum state particles have a tendency to associate
`because of their large surface-to-volume ratio. To
`overcome the problem, various strategies of nanoparticle
`preparation and size control have been investigated.
`These include encapsulation in sol-gels8 and in polymer
`
`† Department of Chemical Engineering.
`‡ Department of Chemistry.
`X Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, May 1, 1997.
`(1) Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 5566.
`(2) Rosetti, R.; Hull, R.; Gibson, J. M.; Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys.
`1985, 82, 552.
`(3) (a) Alivisatos, A. P.; Harris, A. L.; Levinos, N. J.; Steigerwald,
`M. L.; and Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 4000. (b) Alivisatos,
`A. P. Science 1996, 271, 933.
`(4) Weller, H.; Koch, U.; Gutierrez, M.; Henglein, A. Ber. Bunsen-
`Ges. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 649.
`(5) Ramdsen, J. J.; Gratzel, M. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday. Trans. 1
`1984, 80, 919.
`(6) Service, R. F. Science 1996, 271, 920.
`(7) (a) Brus, L. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2555. (b) Petit, C.; Lixon,
`P.; Pileni, M. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 1598.
`
`matrixes9 and the use of organic capping agents.10
`Among them, it is believed that chemical modification
`with organic reagents such as thiols is a useful prepara-
`tion technique that inhibits particle aggregation, im-
`proves suspension stability, and results in new surface
`functionalities.11 On capping with thiols, the weak
`sulfhydryl bond is replaced with a bond between sulfur
`and surface cadmium ions. The capping can lead to
`surface passivation by the annealing of surface defects.12
`In this paper, we report the synthesis and properties
`of sulfhydryl group containing polymer that can be used
`to bind CdS thus resulting in a polymer-semiconductor
`nanocomposite. The monomer used is 4-hydroxythiophe-
`nol and we report the synthesis of copolymers of
`4-hydroxythiophenol and an alkyl-substituted phenol,
`4-ethylphenol. The polymer synthesis is carried out
`enzymatically using an oxidative enzyme, horseradish
`peroxidase. Enzyme-catalyzed phenol polymerizations
`have been previously shown to be feasible in monophasic
`organic solvents.13,14 The novelty of the present work
`is the synthesis of thiol-substituted polyphenols and the
`synthesis medium which is the microstructured envi-
`ronment of water-in-oil microemulsions, or reversed
`micelles as they are often called. This micellar environ-
`ment is ideally suited for the enzymatic synthesis of
`water-insoluble polymers. The organic phase helps
`sustain solubility of the monomer (and growing chain),
`while the microaqueous phase solubilizes the enzyme
`
`(8) Breitscheidel, B.; Zeider, J.; Schubert, U. Chem. Mater. 1991,
`3, 559.
`(9) Wang, Y.; Suna, A.; Mahler, W.; Kasowski, R. J. Chem. Phys.
`1987, 87, 7315.
`(10) Steigerwald, M. I.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Gibson, J. M.; Haris, T.
`D.; Kortan, R.; Muller, A. J.; Thayer, A. M.; Duncan, T. M.; Douglas,
`D. C.; Brus, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3047.
`(11) Yoneyama, H.; Torimoto, T. Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 492.
`(12) Majetich, S. A.; Carter, A. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8727.
`(13) Dordick, J. S.; Marletta, M. A.; Klibanov, A. M. Biotechnol.
`Bioeng. 1987, 30, 31.
`(14) Akkara, J. A.; Senecal, K. J.; Kaplan, D. L. J. Polym. Sci., Part
`A: Polym. Chem. 1991, 29, 1561.
`
`S0897-4756(96)00418-8 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`1 of 6
`
`

`

`Polymer-CdS Nanocomposites
`
`with full retention of catalytic activity. In this paper,
`we therefore report the feasibility of preparing polymers
`in reversed micelles, the morphology of such polymers,
`and the attachment of CdS nanoparticles to the polymer.
`The micellar environment can be used to synthesize
`both the polymer and the CdS nanoparticles. We report
`the steady-state luminescence characteristics of these
`interesting polymer-semiconductor nanocomposites.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`The enzyme peroxidase (type II, from horseradish), the
`buffer HEPES [N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N¢-(2-ethane-
`sulfonic acid)], and hydrogen peroxide, were purchased from
`Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO. The monomers, 4-ethylphe-
`nol (EP), 4-hydroxythiophenol (HTP), the anionic surfactant
`bis(2-ethylhexyl)sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT), were all ob-
`tained from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI). The
`solvent isooctane (ACS reagent grade) was also obtained from
`Aldrich.
`Polymer-CdS Synthesis. While both the polymer and
`CdS are synthesized in reversed micelles, the fact that Cd2+
`deactivates horseradish peroxidase necessitates synthesis in
`separate micellar systems. The procedure used in polymer
`synthesis was a simple variation of our earlier procedure.15
`Essentially, the monomers were dissolved in a water-free
`reversed micellar solution containing 0.5 M of the anionic
`surfactant AOT (bis(2-ethylhexyl)sodium sulfosuccinate) in
`isooctane. The total monomer concentration was fixed at 0.15
`M. To this solution, the required volume of enzyme-containing
`HEPES buffer was added to bring the water content to a w0
`value of 15 (w0 is the water-to-surfactant molar ratio). The
`enzyme level in the buffer was adjusted so that the final
`enzyme concentration in the overall solution was 0.5 mg/mL.
`Polymerization was initiated with the addition (in aliquots)
`of the stoichiometric amount of hydrogen peroxide required
`for complete monomer conversion (0.15 M). The initially clear
`solution becomes dark almost immediately and polymer begins
`to precipitate. Although most of the monomer conversion is
`completed within 10-15 min of reaction initiation, the solution
`was stirred for 24 h. The polymer was recovered, washed
`repeatedly with isooctane to remove adsorbed surfactant and
`air-dried.
`CdS nanoparticles were synthesized in reversed micelles
`following standard procedures, using an 0.5 M AOT concentra-
`tion level.16 A 2:1 ratio of Cd2+ containing micelles (from CdCl2
`dissolved in the water pools) mixed with S2- containing
`micelles (from Na2S dissolved in the water pools) yields CdS
`with surface-enriched Cd2+. The w0 for synthesis was adjusted
`to 5 to yield CdS particles of diameter 2-3 nm.17 The CdS
`containing reversed micellar solution was then dried to a
`residue containing CdS and AOT.
`To prepare the composite, the polymer was dissolved in
`dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The CdS + AOT was also
`dispersed into this solution resulting in CdS attachment to
`the polymer thiol groups. The solvent was then removed by
`evaporation in a vacuum oven at room temperature, and the
`residue washed with isooctane. The CdS that is not covalently
`linked to the isooctane-insoluble polymer becomes resuspended
`with AOT in the isooctane wash. After repeated washing with
`isooctane, much of the CdS not covalently attached to the
`polymer is removed. The isooctane wash also removes the
`AOT that is adsorbed to the polymer. The residue, which is
`now the polymer-CdS complex, with CdS covalently attached
`to the polymer, was recovered, dried, and stored for further
`characterization.
`Characterization. The morphologies of the polymer and
`the polymer-CdS nanocomposite were characterized by scan-
`
`(15) Karayigitogulu, C. F.; Kommareddi, N.; Gonzalez, R. D.; John,
`V. T; McPherson, G. L.; Akkara, J. A.; Kaplan, D. L. Mater. Sci. Eng.
`1995, C2, 165.
`(16) Karayitogulu, C. F.; Murthy T.; John, V. T.; McPherson, G. L.
`Colloids Surf. A 1994, 82, 151.
`(17) Henglein, A. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1861.
`
`Chem. Mater., Vol. 9, No. 6, 1997 1343
`
`ning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron
`microscopy (TEM). For SEM analysis, a small amount of the
`solid polymer or the composite was dispersed in isooctane. A
`drop of this suspension was placed on an aluminum stub and
`allowed to dry at room temperature. The stub was then
`coated, first with 20 nm thickness carbon black and then with
`gold. The micrograph was taken at an accleration voltage of
`15-30 kV in a JEOL JSM-820 scanning electron . For TEM
`analysis, a Philips 410 transmission electron microscope with
`a LaB6 (lanthanum hexaboride) crystal electron source was
`used. The polymer containing CdS was dissolved in DMSO,
`and a drop of the solution was placed on a carbon coated copper
`grid and the grid was left to dry for a few minutes before
`transferring into the TEM sample chamber. Micrographs were
`taken at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV.
`Molecular weight distributions of the polymers were mea-
`sured using gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The setup
`consisted of a 25 cm Jordi Gel DVB mixed bed columnm a
`Perkin-Elmer biocompatible binary pump (Model 250) and a
`Perkin-Elmer diode array detector (model 235) interfaced with
`a personal computer. The eluent was THF, and the column
`operated under the eluent head pressure adjusted to maintain
`a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min. The dry polymer was dissolved in
`THF at a concentration of 0.1% (w/v) and 20 (cid:237)L of this solution
`was used for the measurements. Polystyrene samples in the
`molecular weight range of 600-200 000 were used as calibra-
`tion standards.
`An ATI-Mattson Galaxy 6021 FTIR spectrometer was used
`for FTIR measurements. A liquid sample cell (SpectraTech)
`with CaF2 windows and path length 0.3 mm was used to
`measure liquid samples. KBr pellets made from a 1% (by
`weight) polymer/KBr mixture was used to record polymer
`spectra. The UV-vis spectra of the polymers and copolymers
`were recored using a Shimadzu UV-160 spectrophotometer.
`The fluorescence spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer
`luminescence spectrophotometer (LB-50) equipped with a Xe
`lamp as the excitation source. The emission slit was kept at
`10 nm resolution in all measurements.
`A Perkin-Elmer atomic absorption spectrometer, fitted with
`a Cd lamp was used to determine cadmium loading in the
`polymer-CdS complex. the complex (0.01 g) was dissolved in
`1 mL of DMSO. To this solution, 25 (cid:237)L of concentrated HCl
`was added to ensure complete solubility of CdS. The above
`solution was diluted with water to a concentration of 0.1 mg
`composite/mL solution. The absorption of this solution at 322
`nm was used to determine the Cd concentration from a
`standard calibration curve. The instrument absorbance was
`autozeroed using the DMSO/water blank.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`General Characteristics of Polymerization. The
`monomers used and the structure of the anionic sur-
`factant AOT are shown in Figure 1. Peroxidase-
`catalyzed polyphenol synthesis follows reaction mech-
`anisms similar to those involved in biological lignin
`synthesis.18 Phenoxy radical centers delocalize onto the
`ortho positions from which coupling occurs. The heme
`group of the enzyme (HRP) undergoes 2-electron redox
`reactions during monomer coupling.19 The overall
`condensation reaction can be written as
`
`(R1)H + (R2)H + H2O2 f R1-R2 + 2H2O
`
`where (R1)H and (R2)H are the phenolic monomers or
`oligomers. The direct ring-to-ring attachment generates
`a conjugated polymer in contrast to the more conven-
`tional phenol-formaldehyde resins. Thus, enzymati-
`
`(18) Freudenberg, K. Science 1965, 148, 595.
`(19) Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J. M. C. Free Radicals in Biology and
`Medicine; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1989.
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`

`1344 Chem. Mater., Vol. 9, No. 6, 1997
`
`Premachandran et al.
`
`Figure 1.
`(a) Structure of the anionic surfactant AOT, bis-
`(2-ethylhexyl)sodium sulfosuccinate. (b) A simplified schematic
`of the coupling between 4-ethylphenol and 4-hydroxythiophe-
`nol.
`
`Figure 2. FTIR of AOT CdO vibrations in reversed micelles
`as perturbed by the monomers 4-ethylphenol and 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol. (a) 0.5 M AOT/isooctane micelles with w0 ) 5. (b)
`Solution (a) with addition of 0.15 M 4-ethylphenol. (c) Solution
`(a) with addition of 0.15 M 4-hydroxythiophenol.
`
`cally synthesized polyphenols are of interest for their
`electrooptical properties.20
`An interesting characteristic of enzymatic polyphenol
`synthesis in reversed micelles is the observation of
`monomer-surfactant interactions and the possible par-
`titioning of the monomer to the oil-water interface.
`Evidence of monomer access to the micellar interface
`is usually seen through IR evidence of perturbations to
`AOT headgroup vibrational frequencies as a result of
`AOT-phenol hydrogen bonding.21 Figure 2 illustrates
`the shift of AOT CdO vibrations to lower frequency,
`upon the addition of the two monomers 4-ethylphenol
`and 4-hydroxythiophenol to AOT reversed micelles. We
`also note in this case, that the monomer, 4-ethylphenol
`
`(20) Akkara, J. A.; Ayyagari, M.; Bruno, F.; Samuelson, L.; John,
`V. T.; Karayigitoglu, C.; Tripathy, S.; Marx, K. A.; Rao, D. V. G. L. N.;
`Kaplan, D. L. Biomimetics 1994, 2, 331.
`(21) Rao, A. M.; Gonzalez, R. D.; John, V. T.; Akkara, J. A.; Kaplan,
`D. L. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 140, 912.
`
`Figure 3. Scanning electron micrograph of copoly(4-ethylphe-
`nol/4-hydroxythiophenol) with a 1:1 monomer ratio. The
`spherical morphology is obtained with up to 60% 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol monomer content. At higher levels of 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol, the morphology is lost and the polymer becomes
`insoluble.
`
`is virtually insoluble in water but highly soluble in
`isooctane. On the other hand 4-hydroxythiophenol is
`very sparingly soluble in isooctane, but its solubility is
`considerably increased by the addition of AOT and
`water. The micellar system therefore offers a method
`to bring mutually incompatible monomers together to
`the vicinity of the enzyme located in the microaqueous
`pools. The IR data also indicate that 4-hydroxythiophe-
`nol perturbs AOT CdO vibrations significantly more
`than 4-ethylphenol, perhaps implying stronger hydrogen
`bonding to AOT.
`Polymerization is very rapid and within a few min-
`utes, most of the conversion is complete. The polymer
`formed precipitates out of the solution and is collected,
`dried, and analyzed. As stated in the earlier section,
`the pure polymer from 4-hydroxythiophenol is an in-
`soluble, intractable material and was not studied fur-
`ther. Copolymers from 4-ethylphenol and 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol have been synthesized and characterized.
`Figure 3 illustrates the microspherical morphology
`obtained through synthesis in reversed micelles. The
`microsphere morphology is obtained reproduceably with
`a 3/1 AOT/monomer ratio in agreement with our earlier
`work with pure 4-ethylphenol polymers.15 With the
`copolymers studied here, the microsphere morphology
`is obtained as long as the 4-hydroxythiophenol content
`is less than about 60% of the total monomer content.
`At these compositions, the copolymer and its composites
`with CdS are fully soluble in a variety of polar organic
`solvents. The implication here is that the incorporation
`of 4-ethylphenol into the system separates 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol monomers during synthesis and thereby
`minimizes disulfide bridging.
`While the microsphere morphology is observed with
`the synthesized copolymer, it is noted that the method
`of CdS attachment involves dissolving the copolymer in
`DMSO containing dispersed CdS, as described earlier.
`This procedure destroys the microsphere morphology of
`the nanocomposite. The microspheres can be regener-
`ated by dissolving the nanocomposite in a polar solvent
`(e.g., acetone), followed by reprecipitation using an
`excess of an AOT-isooctane reversed micellar solution
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`3 of 6
`
`

`

`Polymer-CdS Nanocomposites
`
`Chem. Mater., Vol. 9, No. 6, 1997 1345
`
`Table 1. Copolymer Molecular Weight and CdS Content
`as a Function of Monomer Compositiona
`CdS content
`monomer composition
`polydispersity
`in polymer
`(% 4-hydroxythiophenol) Mn
`(Mn/Mw)
`(wt%)
`Mw
`2300
`0%
`1650
`1.4
`0
`2550
`10%
`1750
`1.5
`3.2
`3490
`30%
`2500
`1.4
`5.4
`50%
`4390 10775
`2.2
`7.2
`a The copolymer molecular weights were measured prior to
`attachment of CdS.
`
`Figure 5. Transmission electron micrograph of CdS in
`polymer-CdS complex. The copolymer was prepared with a
`1:1 concentration of 4-hydroxythiophenol and 4-ethylphenol.
`
`copolymer prior to CdS attachment. The loss of this
`absorbance in curve (c) for the polymer-CdS complex
`is indirect evidence of CdS attachment at the copolymer
`thiol groups. The loss of the S-H stretch upon func-
`tionalization was first reported by Torimoto et al.23 in
`their study of PbS attachment to 4-hydroxythiophenol.
`The present study implies that there is retention of thiol
`functionality upon enzymatic copolymer synthesis, and
`that CdS nanoparticles bind to these thiol groups.
`Figure 4 also illustrates the essential phenolic nature
`of the polymer through retention of the hydroxyl stretch
`band between 3100 and 3500 cm-1. We also examined
`the 1H NMR of the polymer-CdS complex, but the
`structural information is limited because of the broad
`and unresolved peaks in the aromatic region, typical of
`macromolecular species.
`A transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of the
`polymer-CdS nanocomposite is shown in Figure 5 with
`the dark patches representing CdS particles (or particle
`agglomerates). The TEM shows sizes ranging from less
`than 5 nm to about 30 nm, with the vast majority of
`the particles below 20 nm. There appears to be a region
`with a high density of particles, but this region is not
`representative of CdS attached to a single polymer
`chain. Copolymer chains with 10-30 units represent
`end-to-end chain lengths of 5-12 nm. Thus, the CdS
`particle size is comparable to the length of the polymer
`chain. Let us consider a simple calculation with a
`copolymer chain 20 units long assuming a 1/1 distribu-
`tion of the two monomers alternating on the chain. In
`a polar solvent, the chain adopts an open structure since
`segment-solvent interactions dominate over the in-
`tramolecular hydrogen bonding responsible for chain
`folding and curvature.22 In such an open structure, a
`20-unit copolymer chain has an extended length of 7.4
`nm with the thiol groups separated by 0.74 nm (calcu-
`lated using the HyperChem Molecular Modeling Soft-
`ware). Assuming a CdS particle size of 3 nm, the
`picture of the nanocomposite is one where there are just
`two or three CdS nanoparticles attached to a chain at
`
`Figure 4. FTIR spectra of copoly(4-ethylphenol/4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol) prepared with an equimolar concentration of
`monomers. The S-H stretch is the small feature at 2560 cm-1.
`The inset shows the expanded region. In the inset (a) il-
`lustrates the S-H stretch of the monomer 4-hydroxythiophe-
`nol, (b) the S-H stretch of the copolymer and (c) the lack of
`an S-H stretch when CdS is attached to the copolymer. These
`are solid-state IR samples prepared in a KBr pellet.
`
`which is a nonsolvent for the composite.22 It is also
`possible to attach CdS to the copolymer by reprecipi-
`tating the copolymer using CdS-containing micellar
`solutions. The use of the reversed micellar medium as
`a nonsolvent for presynthesized polyphenolics, the
`generation of microspheres, and the encapsulation of
`intramicellar solutes in the polymer matrix are de-
`scribed in detail in another paper.22
`Table 1 lists the molecular weight data for the
`copolymers, and it is seen that the peak molecular
`weight shows a consistent increase with the 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol monomer content. From oligomers with
`approximately 13 units (pure 4-ethylphenol monomer),
`the molecular weight increases to about 35 units when
`the 4-hydroxythiophenol content is increased to 50%
`total monomer. Additionally, the polydispersity index
`increases at 50% 4-hydroxythiophenol content. The
`table also lists saturation CdS contents of the compos-
`ites synthesized from these copolymers indicating the
`increase in loading with an increase in the 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol
`level. Evidence of CdS binding to the
`polymer is further shown by the inset to the FTIR
`spectra of Figure 4, where the weak band at 2560 cm-1
`is attributed to the vibrations of the S-H bond. Curve
`(a) of the inset shows the S-H stretch for the monomer,
`4-hydroxythiophenol, while curve (b) represents the
`
`(22) Banerjee, S.; Premchandran, R.; John, V. T.; McPherson, G.;
`Akkara, J.; Kaplan, D. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 3100.
`
`(23) Torimoto, T.; Uchida, H.; Sakata, T.; Mori, H.; Yoneyama, H.
`J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1874.
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`

`1346 Chem. Mater., Vol. 9, No. 6, 1997
`
`Premachandran et al.
`
`Figure 6. The emission spectra of copoly(50% 4-ethylphenol/
`50% 4-hydroxythiophenol)-CdS complex with excitation at 400
`nm. The inset shows the corresponding absorbance spectra.
`The CdS particles here were first synthesized in w0 5 micelles.
`Emission spectra obtained in chloroform.
`
`most. It is also possible that chains could be bridged
`by being bound to the same CdS particle, and a
`multiplicity of such bridged chains and particles could
`lead to the particle clustering. GPC measurements of
`the polymer molecular weight after CdS attachment
`show a small (about 100 Da) but consistent increase in
`the peak molecular weight. This may simply be a result
`of changing GPC elution characteristics upon CdS
`attachment and is not necessarily indicative of chain
`bridging.
`Absorbance and Fluorescence Properties. The
`fluorescence spectrum for a copolymer-CdS complex is
`shown in Figure 6, with excitation at 400 nm. The
`corresponding absorbance spectrum is shown in the
`inset to the figure. The CdS nanoparticles were syn-
`thesized in reversed micelles of w0 5 prior to capping
`with the copolymer. The CdS absorption edge of 400
`nm is virtually unchanged upon capping. The particle
`size of the nanocrystals was calculated from the absorp-
`tion edge to be 3 nm.24 An interesting observation
`regarding the stability of CdS in the complex is the
`retention of the absorption spectrum upon extended
`storage in the absence of light. In contrast to uncapped
`CdS where Ostwald ripening effects are seen upon
`extended storage,25 there is no red-shift in the absorp-
`tion edge that would indicate particle growth. Such
`stabilization to agglomeration is a general phenomena
`of CdS and PbS capping by thiol-based compounds.23
`The emission spectrum of Figure 6 is rather interest-
`ing as it exclusively shows a peak at 470 nm. CdS
`nanoparticles typically have two characteristic emis-
`sions, one at 540 and the other at 470 nm.25,26 The
`emission at 540 nm is assigned to hole-electron recom-
`binations at surface traps, while the higher energy
`emission at 470 nm near the band edge is attributed to
`recombination from the excitonic state in the crystallite
`interior.27,28 To understand whether there is indeed a
`quenching of the low-energy fluorescence upon nano-
`
`(24) Moffit, M.; Eisenberg, A. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 178.
`(25) Robinson, B. H.; Towey, T. F.; Zourab, S.; Visser, A. J. W. G.;
`van Hoek, A. Colloids Surf. 1991, 61, 175.
`(26) Noglik, H.; Pietro, W. J. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1593.
`
`Figure 7. Emission spectra of (a) 2 (cid:2) 10-4 M CdS (Cd2+/S2-
`) 2) prepared in reversed micelles dried, and redispersed in
`chloroform (b) sample (a) with addition of 0.012 mg/mL copoly-
`(50% 4-ethylphenol/50% 4-hydroxythiophenol) (c) sample (a)
`with addition of 0.012 mg/mL poly(4-ethylphenol). Excitation
`at 400 nm.
`
`particle capping with the copolymer, the following
`experiment was carried out, the results of which are
`shown in Figure 7. Here, CdS nanoparticles were
`prepared in reversed micelles, following which the
`micellar system was completely dried leaving a CdS +
`AOT residue. This residue was then redispersed in
`chloroform and the fluorescence spectrum taken (spec-
`trum a). The fluorescence shows typical CdS emission
`characteristics with a broad emission maximum extend-
`ing from 470 to 540 nm. Copoly(4-ethylphenol, 50%/4-
`hydroxythiophenol, 50%) was then dissolved into the
`solution. An immediate quenching of the low-energy
`fluorescence is observed (spectrum b) with a small
`increase in the high-energy emission. The observed
`overall decrease in quantum yield is indicative of
`nonradiative pathways introduced through such surface
`passivation and capping. The selective quenching of the
`540 nm emission has been observed by others upon
`addition of mercaptopyridines26 and methylviologen.29,30
`These earlier studies attributed such selective quench-
`ing to the destruction of surface trap states through
`electron capture by the capping organic compound
`which acts as an electron acceptor.26 Similar mecha-
`nisms may be operational here. Verification that the
`blue-shift is due to the 4-hydroxythiophenol content of
`the copolymer is obtained by adding pure poly(4-
`ethylphenol) rather than the copolymer (spectrum c).
`While there is some quenching of fluorescence, there is
`little change in the fluorescence maximum. The appar-
`ent quenching may be simply due to polymer self-
`absorbance at the excitation wavelength (400 nm).
`Finally, Figure 8 illustrates the emission character-
`istics of copolymer-CdS complexes containing various
`levels of 4-hydroxythiophenol. As intuitively expected,
`the fluorescence intensity increases with the 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol content of the copolymer. The data are
`
`(27) Fojtik, A.; Weller, H.; Koch, U.; Henglein, A. Ber. Bunsen-Ges.
`Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 969.
`(28) Chen, W.; McLendon, G.; Marchetti, A.; Rehm, J. M.; Freedhoff,
`M. I.; Myers, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1585.
`(29) Weller, H.; Koch, U.; Gutierrez, M.; Henglein, A. Ber. Bunsen-
`Ges. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 649.
`(30) Gratzel, M. In Electrochemistry in Colloids and Dispersions;
`Mackay, R. A., Texter, J., Eds.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1992.
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`Polymer-CdS Nanocomposites
`
`Figure 8. Fluorescence emission spectra of CdS from com-
`plexes containing (a) copoly (50% 4-ethylphenol/50% 4-hy-
`droxythiophenol) (b) copoly(70% 4-ethylphenol/30% 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol) (c) copoly (90% 4-ethylphenol/10% 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol). (d) copoly(70% 4-ethylphenol/30% 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol) but without CdS. Emission spectra obtained in
`chloroform with excitation at 400 nm. Saturation loadings of
`CdS used in all samples.
`
`consistent with the observation that the saturation CdS
`loadings on the polymer increase with the 4-hydroxy-
`thiophenol content (Table 1). There is a small red-shift
`in the emission with increasing CdS loading and at the
`highest loading (spectrum a) a distinct shoulder is
`observed at 540 nm indicative of surface recombinations.
`Spectrum (d) is the polymer of spectrum (a) but without
`CdS, which verifies that the polymer has no intrinsic
`fluorescence when excited at 400 nm.
`
`Conclusions
`
`This work demonstrates a biocatalytic approach to
`synthesize polymers that can be formulated into pho-
`toluminescent composites by the attachment of semi-
`conductor nanoparticles. We note that the micellar
`environment, while convenient for the synthesis of CdS
`
`Chem. Mater., Vol. 9, No. 6, 1997 1347
`
`nanoparticles, is not the best environment to synthesize
`monodispersed nanoclusters, and there are much su-
`perior synthetic routes to monodisperse II-VI semicon-
`ductor nanoparticles.31 Regardless of how the semicon-
`ductor component is prepared, the task addressed here
`is the synthesis of the thiol-containing polymer, and this
`seems to be well-suited to the micellar environment.
`Once the polymer is synthesized, attachment of the
`semiconductor component is straightforward. The re-
`sulting nanocomposite is highly processible and can be
`fabricated into films, coatings, etc. An interesting
`aspect of polymer synthesis in reversed micelles is the
`observation that polymer microspheres can be generated
`implying an ease of dispersion in coatings applications.
`The complex displays the fluorescence characteristics
`of CdS but without the low-energy emissions associated
`with surface recombinations. The polymer thus caps
`and passivates the CdS nanoparticles. The complex is
`easily soluble in polar organic solvents. It is indefinitely
`stable in solution both in its solubility characteristics
`and in its luminescent properties.
`Continuing studies seek to expand the application
`potential of these polymer-CdS nanocomposites. Due
`to conjugation in the polymer, these materials may be
`electroluminescent with consequent applications in sen-
`sor and display technologies. The conjugated polymer-
`CdS complex may also have applications in nonlinear
`optics as both components should have high third-order
`nonlinear susceptibilities. From another perspective,
`the hydroxyl groups present on the polymer imply ease
`in functionalization. For example, it is possible to
`attach affinity ligands to the polymer leading to further
`application in biosensor technologies. These materials
`may therefore represent a new class of polymer-
`inorganic composites with useful fluorescent properties.
`
`Acknowledgment. Financial support from National
`Science Foundation and the US Army is gratefully
`acknowledged.
`CM960418P
`
`(31) Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. J. Am. Chem.
`Soc. 1993, 115, 8706.
`
`Downloaded by Scott Reese on October 5, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org
`
` Publication Date (Web): June 17, 1997 | doi: 10.1021/cm960418p
`
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket