throbber
1 of 6
`
`Nanoco Technologies, Ltd
`EXHIBIT 1005
`
`

`

`Physical Chemistry®
`
`~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------~
`Volume JOO, Number 2 January 11, 1996
`·;, R
`·siered in U.S. Parent and Trademark Office
`'·· egi
`-~ C .nvrighr 1996 by rhe American Chemical Sociecy
`JPCHAx 100(2) 441-928 (1996)
`-..:J Or.
`::•
`ISSN 0022-3654
`·Jl
`.fj.
`-'.~£
`;;~
`' ·•;-r
`~~
`;\-.
`'
`:J
`::1
`~ , Editorial
`.. _i
`<
`.~!~~
`~~,
`~ Kinetics of Alignment and Decay in a Highly Entangled Transient Threadlike Micellar Network Studied by Small-Angle
`'.~E
`·~
`P. D. Butler,* L. J . Magid, W. A. Hamilton, J.B. Hayter, B. Hammouda, and P. J. Kreke
`_:;~Orientation of Toluene and Effect of the Photochromic Fulgide. (E)-[a-(2,5-Dimethyl-3-furyl)ethylidene](dicyclopropylmethyl-
`;~.
`JI"
`.) Determination of the Structure of Distorted Ti06 Units i."l the Titanosilicate ETS-10 by a Combination of X-ray Absorption
`· ~
`Spectroscopy and Computer Modeling
`,
`·~-~ Gopinathan Sankar,* Robert G. Bell, J ohn Meurig Thomas,* l'vl:ichael W. Anderson, Panl A. Wright, and Joao Rocha
`
`Neutron Scattering
`
`LETTERS
`
`M. A. El-Sayed
`
`441
`
`442
`
`ene)-2.5-furandione at the Airffoluene Interface
`
`D. T. Cramb, S. C. Martin, and S. C. Wallace*
`
`446
`
`;z1
`·'
`s .. 409
`'o .• 409
`[95
`201
`ii., 294
`' 1t. 184
`63
`, , ~01
`i
`18
`'· 368
`1~ s .. 180
`'LJ.. 47
`'t. 307 p20
`
`11
`
`IJ1
`i 224
`1'
`1409
`}.., 155
`15
`.P. F., 85
`•, 170
`,265
`lj
`,'II .. 190
`~207
`iS5
`l
`)68, 374
`\274
`P .. 130
`133
`1. 331
`l. S., 207
`I
`i
`1
`""· 397
`
`' I
`
`339
`'3
`!
`i90
`;.4-03
`·, 138
`
`t Observation of a New Absorption Band of HOBr and Its Atmospheric Implications
`Rhett J. Barnes, Michael Lock, Jack Coleman, and Amitabha Sinha"'
`·;
`.lJ Probing DNA's Dynamics and Conformational Substates by Enthalpy Relaxation and Its Recovery
`-,~ Vi~osicy Effects of a Graft Copolymer ~ill a Hydrophobic Back::o::::::~::::: :h::~::e::t:::: Mayer*
`i NMR Study
`.•
`;~~ Influence of Adsorbed Molecules on the Configuration of Framework Aluminum Atoms in Acidic Zcolite-tl. A 27 Al MAS
`L. C. de Menorval,* W. Buckermann. F. Figueras, and F. Fajula
`t:: Synthesis and Characterization of Strongly Luminescing ZnS-Capped CdSe Nanocrystals
`_;§
`'-~ ·1 Macrodipole Generated by Symmetry Breaking due to Phase Separation in Mixed Lipid Vesicles
`-~1
`:~
`}j Uni.molecular Reaction of N02: Overlapping Resonances, Fluctuations, and the Transi tion State
`
`".
`
`Cyc!ohexane Oil-Continuous Microemulsion
`
`.
`Anna Holmberg, Lennart Piculell, * and Bengt Wesslen
`
`1,J
`
`Dietmar Porschke
`
`FEATURE ARTICLE
`
`Margaret A. Hines and Philippe Guyot-Sioonest*
`
`Scott A. Reid and Hanna Reisler
`
`-~!
`~i.
`:$
`:,~I
`MOLECULAR DYNA.!VUCS AND RELAXATION PROCESSES
`1 Topographical Features of Potential Energy Surfaces of the B + Oi Chemical Reaction
`
`'If. Transient EPR Studies of Ion-Paired Metalloporphyrin Hecerodimers
`Muhamad Bugerat, Arthur van der Est," Emmanuel Ojadi, Laszlo Biczok, Henry Linschitz,
`Haim Levanon, and Dietmar Stehlik*
`
`.
`
`.
`
`j
`
`ARTICLES
`
`Kuo-mei Chen,* Kuo-huei Lee, Jia-lin Chang, Chung-hwa Sung, Teng·hui Chung,
`Tai·kang Liu, and Huey-cherng Perng
`
`SPECTROSCOPY, CLUSTERS, AND MOLECULAR BEAMS
`
`~"
`~,
`
`'1
`
`449
`
`453
`
`458
`
`462
`
`465
`
`468
`
`472
`
`474
`
`488
`
`495
`
`2 of 6
`
`

`

`-j;
`;~- r,etters
`. ~:
`"'· the heat remc
`to approxim~I

`~~ characterizat1
`::. temperature n
`· /
`in five 0.55 1
`NOTiCE: ~h.is material ;"T'.~·r 'iP. ·r:'}o16lfil<erdile rat
`by copyngnt law (Title J 7 :_, 3 ·CcaoMV1g the r•
`Tue nanoc
`i. drous methar
` and subsequf
`to rinse an)
`
`1 1:
`
`I dispersed in
`I. centrifuged
`' reagents.
`l
`
`468
`
`J. Phys. Chem. 1996, JOO, 468-471
`
`Synthesis and Characterization of Strongly Luminescing ZnS-Capped CdSe Nanocrystals
`
`Margaret A. Hines and Philippe Guyot-Sionnest*
`James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago. Chicago, Illinois 60637
`
`Received: August JO, 1995; In Final Form: Occober 16, 1995®
`
`We describe the synthesis of ZnS-capped CdSe semiconductor nanocrystals using organometallic reagents
`by a two-step single-flask method. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy and
`optical absorption are consistent with nanocrystals containing a core of nearly monodisperse CdSe of 27- 30
`A diameter with a ZnS capping 6 ± 3 A thick. The ZnS capping with a higher bandgap than CdSe passivates
`the core crystallite removing the surface traps. The aanocrystals exhibit strong and stable band-edge
`luminescence with a 50% quantum yield at room temperature.
`
`Introduction
`
`Semiconductor nanocrystals exhibit interesting size-tunable
`optical properties due to the confinement of the electronic wave
`functions. Over the past decade, much progress has been made
`in the synthesis and characterization of monodisperse nano(cid:173)
`crystals of a wide variety of semiconductors, such as II-VI, 1 ·2
`various chalcogenides,2 Si,3•4 and GaAs.s-7 In particular, II(cid:173)
`VI materials have received much attention and a synthesis has
`been recently developed for CdSe that leads to an unprecedented
`degree of monudispersivity and crystalline order,8 allowing
`detailed investigations of the size-dependent optical absorption.9
`,Tue high surface~to-vo!ume ratio of small nanocrystals
`/ suggests that the surface properties should have significant
`effects on their structural and optical properties. While surfaces
`capped by various organic or inorganic layers appear to influence
`only mildly the absorption characteristics, it is well-known that
`the emission efficiency, spectrum, and time evolution are very
`strongly affected by the surface. This is generally understood
`as being due to the presence of gap surface states arising from
`surface nonstoichiometry, unsaturated bonds, etc. Control of
`the surface is in particular the key to highly luminescent nano(cid:173)
`crystals. Organically capped nanocrystals have already a
`quantum yield of ~ 10% at room temperature reaching nearly
`100% at low lemperatures8·9 but at the expense of very long
`(microseconds) fluorescence lifetimes. These nanocrystals do
`not yet have a perfectly passivated surface. They exhibit some
`red-shifted luminescence and complex decay of the excited
`state. '°·11 Inorganic ·capping provides an alternative.
`Layered and composite semiconducror nanocrystals have
`already been studied by several groups. Systems studied have
`been (CdS)Cd(OH)z, 12.13 (CdSe)ZnS, 14 (CdSe)ZnSe, 15•16 and
`((CdS)HgS)Cd(OH)2. 17.18 Choosing the relative bandgap posi(cid:173)
`tions leads to enhanced charge transfer or improved lumines(cid:173)
`cence. 2 Ideally, epitaxial encasing would be achieved although
`the similar dielectric constants and bonding characteristics
`introduce additional difficulties to maintain size control or
`prevent alloying. Prior to this work, colloidal CdS capped with
`the inorganic capping Cd(OH)2 displayed the highest room(cid:173)
`temperature quantum yield (20% ).12 At low temperature, the
`quantum yield increases to 80%, and the fluorescence lifetime
`does not increase much. 13 These favorable characteristics have,
`in particular, allowed us to obtain single-clus~er fluorescence
`spectra in a previous experiment. 19 CdSe synthesized by the
`inverse micelle method bas also been successfully capped with
`
`<>Abstract p1iblished in Advance ACS Abstracts, December 15, 1995.
`
`ZnS1 4 and ZnSe.15 The ZnS-capped CdSe exhibit enhanced
`band-edge luniinescence and an order of magnitude increase
`of the quantum yield. M ZnSe-capped CdSe has not been
`discussed for its luminescence properties, but structural studies
`confirmed the shell-core structure.15 Thin film composites of
`CdSe nanocrystals in a ZnSe matrix have also been made by a
`combination of electrospray and organometallic chemical vapor
`deposition, 16 and enhanced luminescence has been reported.
`With the excellent size control that can now be achieved for
`CdSe nanocrystals, the capping of a size-tunable lower bandgap
`core nanocrystal with a higher bandgap shell is an attractive
`possibility that could lead to nanocrystals with improved
`luminescence, higher stability (protected from the surrounding
`matrix), and yet electrically connected (better than with an
`organic capping layer). The (CdSe)ZnS nanocrystals that are
`described here are a step in this direction with the highest
`luminescence quantum yield yet achieved while at tbe same
`time preserving a good degree of monodispersivity. We
`describe the synthesis and provide the results of characterization
`by room-temperature optical absorption and luminescence,
`fluorescence decay, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray
`photoelectron spectroscopy.
`
`Experimental Section
`
`The nanocrystals were synthesized by using modifications
`of previously reported methods. 8•20 All reagents were used as
`purchased with no additional purification. Tri-n-octylpbosphine
`[TOP], tri-n-octylphosphine oxide [TOPO], selenium shot, 1 .M
`dimethylzinc [Me2Zn) in heptane, and anhydrous methanol and
`chloroform were purchased from Aldrich. Bis(trimethylsilyl)
`sulfide[(TMShS] and d.imethylcadmium [Me2Cd) were pur(cid:173)
`chased from Fluka and Organometallics Inc., respectiveiy.
`Stock soiutions of Cd and Se were prepared in a Nrfilled
`drybox by dissolving 0.2 g (0.0025 mol) of Se in 4.5 mL of
`TOP. MeiCd (0.25 rnL, 0.0035 mol) was added to the TOPSe
`and diluted with 19.5 mL of TOP. The Zn and S stock soMion
`was similarly prepared witb 0.52 mL of (TMS)2S (0.0025 mo!~
`in 4.5 mL of TOP, adding 3.5 mL of Me2Zn solution (0.003)
`mo!), and diluting with 16 rnL of TOP.
`The synthesis was performed by the following method: I 2 5
`g of TOPO was heated to 200 °C under vacuum, at which
`temperature it was dried and degassed for approximately 20
`min. The temperature was then raised to 350 °C und~r
`approximately 1 atrn of Ar. Once the temperarure bad stabi(cid:173)
`lized, 0.7 rnL (0.07 mrnol Se, 0. 1 mmol Cd) of Cd/Se/TOP
`stock solution was injected into the reaction flask. and
`
`0022-3654/96/20100-0468$12 .0010
`
`© 1996 American Chemical Society
`
`Dilutions
`for room-ten
`spectra wer1
`the size. Tl
`Elmer UV/\
`acquired at J
`quantum yic
`emission of
`of470 nm'
`Samples:
`using gold l
`Cr adhesion
`inEtOH for
`with EtOH.
`nanocrystal
`rinsed and
`Electronics
`source.
`The TEI
`Philips Clv
`5Qlutions c
`A thick cai
`solution in
`
`Results a1
`
`I:.
`•··
`
`Synthes
`. by using s
`growth.8
`from the c
`material \
`CdSe nan
`small size
`temperatu
`the condi
`reproduci
`: • .. : : between '.
`'.
`their Fig1
`:·· CdSe wit
`critical t<
`
`r, coating.
`
`. , The cl
`·, .:r auempts
`·''''
`: \' semiconc
`j ;:;., such that
`: / :>· need for
`~~!::. forms at
`~:' ·.' do not a
`· ~f· due tot
`.=..: · where ti
`~·}:
`tt'' Particula
`3tt: this d1ffi
`
`,l ~···
`
`3 of 6
`
`

`

`~ · · J.,elters
`... ~ '.
`
`J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 100, 'No. 2, 1996 469
`
`tbe heat removed. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool
`w approximately 310 °C, and a small aliquor was extracted for
`·characterization of the initial CdSe nanocrystals. When the
`temperature reached 300 °C the Zn/S!TOP solution was injected
`in five 0.55 mL portions at approxi!Dately 20 s intervals. A
`iota! mole ratio of injected reagents was 1:4 Cd/Se:Zn/S. Upon
`cooling the reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 1 h.
`The nanocrystals were purified by precipitation with anhy(cid:173)
`drous methanol The precipitate was collected by centrifuging
`and subsequently washed three times with anhydrous methanol
`to rinse any residual. TOPO. The nanocrystals were then
`dispersed in 10 mL of anhydrous chloroform. The solution was
`centrifuged to remove any residual debris and unreacted
`reagents.
`Dilutions of the concentrated nanocrystal solution were used
`for room-ternperat~e optical characterization. The absorption
`spectra were compared to those in the literature6 to estimate
`the size. The absorption spectra were acquired on a Perkin(cid:173)
`Elmer UV/vis spectrometer. The luminescence spectra were
`acquired al right angle on a SPEX Fluorolog spectrometer. The
`quantum yield was measured by comparison of the integrated
`emission of rhodamioe 560 (exciton) in ethanol at an excitation
`of 470 nm with collection between 480 ~d 850 nm.
`Samples for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were prepared
`using gold films (2000 A.) on silicon wafers with a thin (50 AJ
`Cr adhesion layer that were placed into 5 mM 1,6-hexanedithiol
`in EtOH for 2 h.20 The films were removed, rinsed thoroughly
`with EtOH. dried with Ar, and placed into dilute solutions of
`nanocrystals in CHC13 for 12 h. The samples were once again
`rinsed and dried. The spectra were acquired on a Physical
`Electronics 5000 LS ESCA System using an Al Ko. X -ray
`source.
`The TEM images of the nanocrystals were acq uired on a
`Philips CM electron microscope operating at 200 kV. Dilute
`solutions of the nanocrystals in CHCb were dropped onto 50
`A thick carbon coated copper grids (400 mesh) with the excess
`solution immediately wicked away.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Synthesis of nearly monodisperse nanocrystals is achieved
`by using supersaturation for sudden nucleation and subsequent
`growlh.8 Io this work, we followed more closely a variant20
`from the original method,8 which produces smaller amounts of
`material with a faster turnover but still nearly monodisperse
`CdSe nanocrystals with well-defined absorption features for
`small sizes ( <40 A). Since changes in the amount injected and
`temperature ofTOPO produces variations in the final CdSe size,
`the conditions described in the previous section apply to the
`reproducible synthesis of rather monodisperse nanocrystals
`between 27 and 30 A as shown in their absorption spectrum in
`their Figure 1. The ability to synthesize nearly monodisperse
`CdSe without further size-selective precipitation8 is evidently
`critical to retain a narrow size distribution with an additional
`coating.
`The choice of ZnS for the capping is based on the earlier
`anempts in the literature and is guided by the need for a
`semiconducror with a wider bandgap than the core. It is also
`such that both holes and electron are a priori confined, i.e., the
`need for a normal configuration.22 An advantage is that ZnS
`forms at lower temperatures than CdS and that ZnS and CdSe
`do not alloy well. However this last characteristic is in pan
`due io the large lattice mismatch between the two materials
`In
`Where the CdSe bond is about 12% larger than ZnS.23
`P<lrticular, this prevents growing flat heterostructures. However,
`this difficulty may become relaxed for small nanocrystals with
`
`Figure 1. TEM picture of (CdSe)ZnS nanocrystals. This picture is
`95 x 95 nm.
`
`short facets. Further studies exploring different sizes are in
`progress. The procedure of adding Me2Zn and (TMS)zS in
`several steps at lower temperature was guided by the need to
`minimize separate ZnS nucleation and to avoid growth of the
`CdSe particles themselves.
`The presence of Zn and S on the synthesized (CdSe)ZnS
`nanocrystals is unambiguously confirmed by XPS. The results
`indicate more Zn than C d (approximately 3x) which is due to
`the finite probe depth (~50 A), and further studies are underway;'
`to obtain more quantitative results. TEM images of (CdSe)(cid:173)
`ZnS show also very clearly that these particles are larg~r than
`the starting CdSe nanocryscals. (CdSe)TOP0 and (CdSe)ZnS
`samples of identical reaction batches were analyzed. for particle
`size by visual appreciation as well as computer analysis21 of
`the TEM images. The diameter of the (CdSe)ZnS particles is
`larger by 12 ± 6 A from which we deduce the ZnS capping to
`be 6 ± 3 A thick if, as discussed below, the core size remained
`constant. flg ure l shows a TEM image of the (CdSe)ZnS
`nanocrystals.
`The indication that the capping process has not lead to
`significant modification of the CdSe core comes fro m the
`comparison of the absorption spectra before and after capping.
`As shown in Figure 2, for the (CdSe)ZnS particles, the first
`exciton peak has broadened some but has not shifted ap(cid:173)
`preciably. Only at shorter wavelength does ¢e absorption
`spectrum deviate significantly from the (CdSe)TOPO system.
`This suggests that the firs t electronic ~tates of the CdSe core
`have been little modified. Importantly, this is also consistent
`with no major alloying or incorporation of the Zn or S inside
`the CdSe core.
`Th e central result of this work is that the fluorescence
`efficiency of the ZnS capped clusters is dramatically enh anced.
`As shown in Figure 3, the fluorescence spectrum of (CdSe)(cid:173)
`TOPO has a broad tail due to surface traos (700-800 nm),
`despite having a strong band-edge lumines~ence (530 nm) as
`observed by others.8 The fluorescence spectrum of (CdSe)(cid:173)
`ZnS retains the sharp peak with a small red shift (~5 nm) but
`has a flat baseline to the red of the emission peak. TI1e 50%
`quantwn yield makes the sample solution appear to "glow·• green
`m room light. It is therefore clear that the ZnS capping has
`greatly reduced the traps still present in (CdSe)TOPO.
`
`ixxlifications
`t
`i'ere used as
`j:Ylphosphilie
`:m shot, 1 M
`'.iethanol and · N
`· .::1
`llmethylsilyl)
`'·i
`J were pur-
`·~tively.
`•· &~
`!1 a Ni-filled J
`'-l
`In 4.5 mL of
`ll the TOPSe
`· '.J
`'~-
`lrock solution
`, ·j
`1:0.0025 mo!)
`tion (0.0035
`,._;
`I
`.J
`:iethod: 12.5
`lm. at which ":
`hxiinatel y 20 ·: 1
`j 0 °C under
`
`· c ..
`
`lire had stabi- '· .. ·
`
`. Cd/Sef!OP
`· flask, and
`

`; ~
`
`4 of 6
`
`

`

`· ·:--·r,etters
`:. (!-~'
`. i;· of their specn
`~.: program of
`« Lucille Pack
`· \1 p.,CS meetin;
`
`.-;
`
`]:leferences
`
`t
`
`(I) Bnis.
`(l) Welle·
`£llgl. 1993, 3;
`(3) Tag$
`Appl. Phys. L•
`(4) Brus,
`(5) Olsha
`:;oc. 1990, 11
`(6) (a) U
`5382. (bl Us
`J. J. Phys. CJ
`(7) Kher
`(8) Mun:
`1993, 115. 8'
`(9) Norr
`Lta. 1994. 7
`(10) Baw
`T. M.; Steig•
`(11) Bav.
`Phys. 1992,
`
`l~
`I I
`I
`
`I
`
`r
`
`' l
`l.
`I
`J
`
`J
`
`r
`,. . .
`
`j.
`
`·r,,. ,.
`
`.
`.
`.
`
`470 J. Phys. Chem., Vol. JOO, No. 2, 1996
`
`1.0 ~-~--...----.----,---,----., 12
`
`8
`
`0.8
`
`:j .e 0.6
`Ci>
`0 c
`ro
`.0 :s 0.4
`,,.,
`.0
`<C
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`400
`
`600
`500
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`Figure 2. Absorption spectrum of the (CdSe)TOPO (dotted line) and
`the (CdSe)ZnS nanocrystals (solid line). The fluorescence of the
`(CdSe)ZnS is also shown (solid line).
`
`/
`
`4
`
`--:- 3
`=!
`~
`::::-
`·o;
`c 2 ~
`
`<::
`
`x6
`····················
`
`.... ·········
`
`0 1::....'.~-L_l:::::=r=~:::r:=:;::!:;::::.J
`600
`700
`800
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`Figure 3. Fluorescence of the (CdSe)TOPO (dotted line) and (CdSe)(cid:173)
`ZnS (solid line) nanocrystals normalized by their absorption al the
`excitation wavelength (470 nm).
`
`We also note that this fluorescence is stable for months and
`fairly insensitive to the environment, especially as no precautions
`are taken during workup of the reaction solution and subsequent
`manipulations to eliminate oxygen. All products are stored as
`CHCJ3 solutions, and over a,period of months there has been
`no reduction of the quantum yield, W1Jike for the (CdSe)TOPO.
`Regarding this stability, it may be relevant that ZnO remains a
`semiconductor with a wide direct bandgap while CdO has a
`small indirect bandgap,13 but we also verified that solvents such
`as pyridine which tend to quench the fluorescence of (CdSe)(cid:173)
`TOPO, presumably by replacing the TOPO ligands, have little
`effect on the quantum yield of (CdSe)ZnS. Finally, laser
`spectroscopy experiments in progress show a much reduced
`
`I ., ,.
`I I
`I : : !
`I l ;
`
`. I
`
`Modulation Frequency (MHz)
`10
`
`100
`......... •····
`,. _ _,,,..,....,,0.8
`
`•...
`
`80
`
`--(cid:173)Vl
`~ 60
`I....
`Ol
`
`~40
`
`Q)
`
`~ 20
`~ a:
`
`b)
`
`......
`
`·-·-
`·····
`····· -·-····
`·3 '--~~~~~~~~~~-·-·· ·_· ·_··~··~~--'
`Time (ns)
`500
`0
`
`Figure 4. (a) Phase and amplitude of tbe fluorescence decay for
`(CdSe)ZnS (dashed line, filled circles), (CdSe)TOPO (dashed line, open
`circle), and (CdS)Cd(OH}., (dashed line. open diamonds) nanocrvstals
`The lines are four-exponential fits. (b) Reconstructed time decay pl~
`
`tendency to permanent bleaching. This indicates chat the
`capping has the added benefit of protecting the interface.
`The capping also strongly affects the fluorescence decay.
`Room-temperature measurements, on three samples, (CdSe)(cid:173)
`ZnS, (CdSe)TOPO, and (CdS)CdOH2, have been taken with
`the phase method and results, which are fitted well wirh a
`minimum of four exponential components, are shown in Figure
`4. The relative strengths of the four fluorescence decay
`components are (8.5%, 160 ns; 53%, 26 ns; 37%, 12 ns; l.5%,
`1.5 ns) for (CdSe)ZnS, (59.5%, 290 ns; 29%, 49 ns; 10%, 6.1
`us; 1.5%, 0.7 ns) for (CdSe)TOPO, and (54.5%, 203 ns; 38%,
`40 ns; 6%, 7 ns; 1.5%, 0.7 ns) for (CdS)CdOH2. ,. The important
`observation is that 90% of the decay components are in the
`10-30 ns range for (CdSe)ZnS, in sharp conrrast to (CdSe)(cid:173)
`TOPO where 60% of the fluorescence is in the 300 ns range.
`Clearly the capping simplifies the recombination kinetics. If
`the recombination originates from trap states, for example at
`the CdSe!ZnS interface, the overall faster recombination may
`indicate that the trap states are more delocalized. However.
`the nature of the recombination process is a complex issue that
`requires much further investigation.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Nanocrystals of CdSe capped with ZnS have been synthesized
`using organometallic reagents. The higher bandgap ZnS is
`directly grown onto nearly monodisperse CdSe cores with
`retention . of initial core size. The presence of the ZnS was
`confirmed by XPS, and TEM images are consistent with a 6 :±::
`3 A thick capping. The ZnS capping passivates and protects
`the surface as determined by the enhanced and stable room·
`temperature band-edge luminescence with 50% quantum yield.
`These new nanocrystals are being further characterized for their
`low-temperature optical properties and recombination kinetics.
`
`Acknowledgment. ·we thank T. L. Hazlett from the LFD
`at The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (NIH RR03155-
`01 and UflJC) for the time-resolved fluorescence data; Stephen
`R. Wasserman, Chemistry Division. Argonne National Labora·
`t0ry, for the XPS data; Robert Josephs, Deparunent of Molecular
`Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, for the TEN!
`images; and Graham Fleming and Hellmut Fritzsche for the use
`
`5 of 6
`
`

`

`Letters
`
`of their spectrometers. 11ris work was supported by the MR.SEC
`program of NSF und~r. DMR-9_400379 and the David and
`Lucille Packard Founaauon. This work was presented at the
`ACS meeting in Chicago on Aug 20, 1995.
`
`References and Notes
`(l) Brus. L. E. App. Phys. 1991, A53. 465.
`(2) Weller, H. Angew. Chem. 1993, 32, 4l ; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
`Engl. 1993, 32_. 41; Adu. Mater. 1993, 5, ~8.
`.
`.
`:· .'
`(3) Tagaki. H.; Ogawa, H.; Yamazaki. Y.; Ish1zaki. A.; Nakagm, T.
`Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 56, 2379.
`(4) Brus. L. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1994. 98, 3575.
`(5) Olshavsky, M.A.; Goldstein. A. N .; Alivisams, A . P. J. Am. Chem.
`Soc. 1990, 112, 94 38.

`(6) (a) Usbida. H.; Curtis, C. J.: Nozik, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1991. 95,
`5382. (b) Ushlda, H.; Cunis, C. J.; Kamat, P. V.: Jones, K. M.; Nozik, A.
`J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96. 1156.
`(7) Kher. S. S.; Wells, R. L. Chem. Mater. 1994,,6, 2056.
`(8) Murray, C. B.; Norris. D. J.; Bawendi. M . G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`1993. II5. 8706.
`(9) Norris. D. J.; Sacra, A.; Murray, C. B.; Bawendi, M. G. Phys. Reu.
`I.ell. 1994, 72. 2612.
`(10) Bawe!Jdi, M. G.: Wilson, W. L.; Rothberg, L.; Carroll, P. J.; Jedju,
`T. M.; Steigerwald. M. L.; Brus, L. E. Phys. Rev. I.err. 1990, 65 , 1623.
`(11) Bawendi, M. G.; Carroll, P. J.; Wilson, W. L.; Brus, L. E. J. Chem.
`Phys. 1992, 96, 946.
`
`J. Phys. Chem., Vol. JOO, No. 2, l996 471
`
`(12) Spahnel. L.; Haase. M.; Weller, H.; Henglcin A J Am Ch
`Soc. 1987, 109, 5649.
`'



`em.
`(1_3) Eychmuller, A.; Hasselbarth, A.; Katsikas, L.; Weller, H. J.
`Lummescmce 1991, 48149, 745.
`(14) Kanan, A. R.: Hull, R.; Opila, R. L.; Bawendi, M. G.; Steigerwald,
`M. L.; Carroll, P. J.; Brus, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1327.
`(!5) Hoener, C. P.; Allan. K . A_.; Bard, A- J.; Campion, A.; Fox, M.A.;
`Maliouk, T. E.; Webber, S. E.; White, J.M. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3812.
`(16) Eychrnuller. A.; Mews, A.; Weller, H. Chem. Phys. Lerr. 1993, 208,
`.
`~
`~
`(17) Mews, A.; Eychmuller, A.; Giersig, M.: Schoos, D.; Weller, H.J.
`Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 934.
`(18) Danek. M.; Jensen, K. F .; Murray, C. B.; Bawendi, M. G. Appl.
`Phys. Lett. 1994, 65, 2795; Crysr. Growth 1994. 145, 7 14.
`(19) Blanton, S. A.; Dehestani, A.; Lin, P. C.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Chem.
`Phys. Lett. 1994, 229, 317.
`(20) Bowen Katari. J. E.; Colvin, V. L.; Alivisatos, A. P. J. Phys. Chem.
`1994, 98, 4 l09.
`(21) Computer software developed by David Grier and John Crocker,
`James Franck Institute, University of Chicago.
`(22) Basic properties of Semiconductors; Moss, T. S., Series Ed.; Nonh
`Holland: Arnsteidam. 1992; Vol. t.
`(23) Semiconducio rs, Data in Science and Technology, Springer(cid:173)
`Verlag: Berlin, 1992.
`
`JP9530562
`
`1~.o
`
`iOO
`decay for
`Hine, open
`~ocrystals.
`/;t;cay plot
`
`. that the
`1ace.
`~ decay.
`I (Cc!Se)(cid:173)
`aken with
`~u with a
`1in Figure
`re decay
`ns; 1.5%,
`'10%, 6.1
`Ins; 38%,
`importaut
`are in the
`o (CdSe)(cid:173)
`•ns range.
`inetics. If
`xample al
`ation may
`However,
`.issue that
`
`ynthesized
`ap ZnS is
`:ores with
`· ZnS was
`with a 6 ±
`1d protects
`Ible room(cid:173)
`llUm yield.
`:cl for their
`•n kinetics.
`
`o the LFD
`RR03I55-
`a; Stephen
`1al Labora(cid:173)
`'Molecular
`irtheTEM
`for the use
`
`6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket