throbber
Cardiovascular effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
`E Loh, J S Stamler, J M Hare, J Loscalzo and W S Colucci
`
`Circulation
`
`1994;90:2780-2785
`Circulation.(cid:160)
`doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.90.6.2780
`is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231
`Copyright © 1994 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
`Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539
`
`The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the
`World Wide Web at:
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/90/6/2780
`
`
`
` Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally publishedPermissions:
`
`in
` can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial
`Circulation
`Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located,
`click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about
`document.
`Permissions and Rights Question and Answer
`this process is available in the
`(cid:160)
` Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints:
`
`
`http://www.lww.com/reprints
`(cid:160)
`Subscriptions: Circulation Information about subscribing to
`
`
` http://circ.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/
`(cid:160)
`
`
`
`is online at:
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2779
`
`

`
`2780
`
`Cardiovascular Effects of Inhaled Nitric Oxide
`in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction
`
`Evan Loh, MD; Jonathon S. Stamler, MD; Joshua M. Hare, MD;
`Joseph Loscalzo, MD, PhD; Wilson S. Colucci, MD
`
`pulmonary artery wedge pressure and despite a 4±2%
`(P<.05) decrease in cardiac index. The magnitude of the
`decrease in PVR with inhaled NO was inversely related
`(r= -.713; P<.001) to the baseline PVR. Inhaled NO had no
`effect on heart rate, systemic arterial pressure, systemic vas-
`cular resistance, or LV peak +dP/dt or -dP/dt.
`In patients with heart failure due to LV dys-
`Conclusions
`function, inhalation of NO causes a decrease in the PVR
`associated with an increase in LV filling pressure. These
`findings predict that inhaled NO, if used alone at this dose (80
`ppm), may have adverse effects in patients with LV failure.
`(Circulation. 1994;90:2780-2785.)
`nitric oxide
`Key words
`*
`*
`endothelium-derived factors
`
`lung
`
`*
`
`heart failure
`
`.
`
`Background Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is fre-
`quently elevated in patients with advanced heart failure. Nitric
`oxide (NO), which contributes to the activity of endothelium-
`derived relaxing factor, causes relaxation of pulmonary arter-
`ies and veins in vitro. Inhalation of NO gas causes pulmonary
`vasodilation in patients with primary and secondary forms of
`pulmonary hypertension.
`Methods and Results To test the hypothesis that inhalation
`of NO gas lowers PVR in patients with heart failure, we
`studied the hemodynamic effects of a 10-minute inhalation of
`NO (80 ppm) in 19 patients with New York Heart Association
`class III (n=5) and class IV (n=14) heart failure due to left
`ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Although inhalation of NO had
`no effect on pulmonary artery pressures, the PVR decreased
`by 31±7% (P<.001) due to a 23±+7% increase (P<.001) in
`
`T he endothelium plays an essential role in the
`dynamic regulation of vascular tone by synthe-
`sizing and releasing a variety of substances, one
`of which, endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF),
`has the physicochemical properties of nitric oxide (NO)
`or a closely related substance.12 Endogenous NO pro-
`duced by endothelial cells diffuses into neighboring
`vascular smooth muscle cells, where it binds to the heme
`component of guanylyl cyclase, thereby activating the
`enzyme, resulting in increased cyclic GMP production
`and relaxation.34 Arterial and venous endothelial cells
`in the pulmonary vasculature produce NO constitutively
`and in response to a variety of stimuli.5-8 NO appears to
`be involved both in the regulation of basal pulmonary
`vascular resistance (PVR)9,10 and in counterregulating
`the effects of vasoconstrictor substances.1"-"
`PVR is frequently increased in patients with ad-
`vanced heart failure. The underlying mechanism for
`increased PVR in heart failure is not known, but it
`almost certainly involves activation of vasoconstrictor
`pathways by the sympathetic nervous system, the renin-
`angiotensin system, and/or endothelin.'6'17 Although
`there is evidence that endothelium-dependent vasodila-
`tion is impaired in the systemic vasculature of both
`animal models18 and patients with heart failure,19-22 it is
`
`Received June 20, 1994; revision accepted August 7, 1994.
`From the Cardiovascular (E.L., J.M.H., J.L., W.S.C.) and Res-
`piratory (J.S.S.) Divisions, Departments of Medicine, Brigham
`and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
`Mass.
`Correspondence to Wilson S. Colucci, MD, Cardiovascular
`Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston,
`MA 02115.
`© 1994 American Heart Association, Inc.
`
`not known whether this mechanism contributes to in-
`creased PVR.
`Inhalation of NO gas causes pulmonary vasodilation
`in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension23 and
`pulmonary hypertension secondary to congenital heart
`disease24 and to adult respiratory distress syndrome.25
`These observations suggest that inhaled NO might
`ameliorate pulmonary vasoconstriction, and they led to
`our hypothesis that inhalation of NO would lower PVR
`in patients with heart failure. To test this hypothesis, we
`studied the hemodynamic effects of a 10-minute inha-
`lation of NO (80 ppm) in 19 patients with moderate to
`severe heart failure secondary to LV dysfunction from
`idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
`Methods
`
`Study Population
`Nineteen patients with New York Heart Association func-
`tional class III (n=5) or IV (n= 14) heart failure were studied.
`All patients were receiving digitalis, diuretics, and angiotensin-
`converting enzyme inhibitors. There were 15 men and 4
`women, with a mean age of 52±3 years. The cause of heart
`failure was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 10 patients and idio-
`pathic dilated cardiomyopathy in 9. The peak VO2 averaged
`9.9 + 1.6 mL * kg-' min- . The study protocol was approved by
`the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects from
`Research Risks at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, and
`written informed consent was obtained in all cases.
`Hemodynamic Measurements
`Vasodilators, converting enzyme inhibitors, digitalis, and
`diuretics were withheld on the morning of the catheterization.
`A 7F Swan-Ganz catheter (Arrow International, Inc) was
`placed in the pulmonary artery. Femoral artery pressure was
`monitored via an 8F side-arm sheath (Cordis Laboratories). In
`10 patients, a 7F micromanometer-tipped pigtail catheter
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2780
`
`

`
`Loh et al
`
`Cardiovascular Effects of NO
`
`2781
`
`60 -
`
`55 -
`
`50 -
`
`0O
`
`I
`
`i*
`
`0
`
`* 0
`*
`0
`
`S
`
`S
`
`cn
`E 45-
`
`E2
`
`? 40-
`atot2 35-
`CL0.
`0X 30-
`
`V 3
`
`25-
`
`< 20-
`
`C 15-
`
`E C
`
`L 10-
`
`5-
`
`u
`
`Nitric Oxide
`Room Air
`Graph showing pulmonary artery wedge pressure before
`FIG 2.
`and after a 10-minute inhalation of room air or NO. *P<.001 vs
`room air.
`
`(LVEDP), and LV +dP/dt and -dP/dt were calculated by
`averaging at least 50 consecutive beats under each experimen-
`tal condition.
`
`Inhalation of Nitric Oxide
`NO gas (800 ppm) and N2 (Airco) were mixed by use of a
`standard low-flow blender (Low Flow MicroBlender, Bird
`Products Corp) before introduction into the inspiratory limb
`of a closed breathing circuit attached to a face mask. The
`inhaled concentrations of NO and oxygen were regulated
`separately. The inhaled 02 concentration was measured
`directly with an on-line oximeter (Ohmeda Oximeter). The
`inhaled concentrations of NO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and
`the higher oxides of nitrogen (NOx) were measured contin-
`uously by a chemiluminescence technique (Chemilumines-
`cent NOx-NO2 Analyzer, Thermo Environmental Instru-
`ments, Inc). The exhaled gases were scavenged by a vacuum
`system.
`To establish baseline conditions, patients inhaled room air
`(Fio2, 21%; N2, 79%) via the closed face mask system for 10
`minutes before the baseline hemodynamic measurements.
`Patients then inhaled NO at 80 ppm (FIO2, 21%; N2, 79%) via
`
`650 -
`
`600 -
`
`550 -
`
`500 -
`
`450 -
`E400-
`C)
`O 350-
`
`() 300-
`m 250-
`> 200-
`C-
`
`150 -
`
`100 -
`
`50 -
`
`I
`
`*f
`
`_
`
`0-
`
`o
`
`Nitric Oxide
`Room Air
`Graph showing effect of NO inhalation on pulmonary
`FIG 3.
`vascular resistance (PVR). *P<.001 vs room air.
`
`TABLE 1. Hemodynamic Effects of Inhaled NO in
`Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (n=19)
`P
`Room Air
`NO
`HR, bpm
`90+3
`93+3
`NS
`79±3
`MAP, mm Hg
`81+3
`NS
`SVR, dyne* s *cm`
`1041 ±97
`1102+104
`NS
`35±4
`37±4
`PA, mm Hg
`NS
`25±3
`PAWP, mm Hg
`31+4
`<.001
`LVEDP, mm Hg; n=10
`28±4
`34±5
`.02
`PVR,dyne*s.cm-5
`226±30
`119±13
`<.001
`PA-PAWP, mm Hg
`11±1
`6±0.5
`<.001
`SVI, mL/m2
`26±2
`24±2
`.03
`Cl, L- min-1 m-2
`2.3±0.2
`2.1±0.2
`.03
`HR indicates heart rate; bpm, beats per minute; MAP, mean
`arterial pressure; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; PA, mean
`pulmonary artery measure; PAWP, pulmonary artery wedge
`pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; PVR,
`pulmonary vascular resistance; SVI, stroke volume index; and
`Cl, cardiac index.
`
`(Millar Industries) was placed in the left ventricle (LV),
`allowing for simultaneous dP/dt and right heart pressure
`measurements. The ECG, femoral artery pressure, pulmonary
`artery pressure, and LV pressure were recorded on a strip
`chart recorder (Electronics for Medicine, PPG Biomedical
`Systems Division). Cardiac output was determined by the Fick
`method, based on the measured oxygen uptake (model MRM
`2B, Waters Instruments, Inc) and oxygen content in the
`pulmonary and femoral arteries.26 Oxygen content was calcu-
`lated from the blood hemoglobin and oxygen saturation by
`standard methods.26 Blood oxygen saturation was determined
`in duplicate samples on a Ciba-Corning model 270 Co-oxime-
`ter. LV peak +dP/dt (+dP/dt) and peak -dP/dt (-dP/dt)
`were computed on-line by an Electronics for Medicine ampli-
`fier (model 220A). Values for heart rate, arterial pressure,
`pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pres-
`sure, LV systolic pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure
`
`TT
`
`_ Room Air
`M 80 ppm NO|
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`T
`
`60
`
`55
`
`50
`
`45
`
`0) 40
`E 35
`
`1-1
`(D 30
`
`) 25
`Cl)
`0)
`L_ 20-
`
`m 15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`...buik
`
`_.ti ...,
`
`Wedae
`oyo.,9.st_,._;
`Bar graph showing effect of inhalation of NO gas (80
`FIG 1.
`ppm, 10 minutes) on pulmonary artery (PA) pressures in 19
`patients with heart failure secondary to left ventricular dysfunc-
`tion. Measurements were made after the patients inhaled room
`air (shaded bars) or NO (solid bars) from a face mask for 10
`minutes. *P<.001 vs room air.
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2781
`
`

`
`2782
`
`Circulation
`
`Vol 90, No 6 December 1994
`
`face mask for 10 minutes, and hemodynamic measurements
`were repeated.
`Statistical Methods
`All data are presented as the mean±SEM. Differences
`between two observations for one variable within the same
`group were determined by two-tailed paired t test. Differ-
`ences between groups were determined by two-tailed un-
`test. Differences were considered significant if
`paired t
`the null hypothesis could be rejected at the .05 probability
`level.
`
`Results
`Hemodynamic Effect of Inhaled NO
`Baseline measurements during inhalation of room air
`revealed moderate LV failure with elevation of the
`LVEDP and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure,
`and reduced stroke volume and cardiac indexes (Table
`1). There was moderate reactive pulmonary hyperten-
`sion, with an average PVR of 226±30 dyne sec cm
`Inhalation of NO caused no change in heart rate,
`mean systemic arterial pressure, systemic vascular resis-
`tance, or pulmonary artery pressure (systolic, diastolic,
`or mean) but caused a 23 ± 7% increase in the mean
`pulmonary artery wedge pressure (Table 1, Figs 1 and
`2) associated with 4±2% and 7±2% decreases in car-
`diac index and stroke volume index, respectively (Table
`1). The mean transpulmonary pressure gradient de-
`creased by 35 ±7% (Table 1), and the PVR decreased by
`31±7% (Table 1 and Fig 3).
`The decrease in PVR was due to the increase in
`pulmonary artery wedge pressure, as shown by the corre-
`lation (r= -.848, P=.0001) between the changes in PVR
`and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (Fig 4A) and lack
`of correlation with changes in pulmonary artery pressure
`(Fig 4B; r=.13) or cardiac index (Fig 4C; r=.04). The
`increase in mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure was
`due to an increase in LV filling pressure, as shown by the
`correlation (r=.939, P<.0001) between the changes in LV
`end-diastolic pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pres-
`sure with inhaled NO (Fig 5).
`
`TABLE 2. Hemodynamic Characteristics of Patients
`With a Change in Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure
`Above or Below the Median With Inhalation of NO
`% PAWP
`% PAWP
`<0.26
`>0.26
`(n=g)
`(n=10)
`p
`HR, bpm
`87±4
`94+3
`NS
`MAP, mm Hg
`75±3
`84+3
`.02
`SVR, dyne * s* cm`
`987+153
`1218±148
`NS
`PA, mm Hg
`29+5
`42±5
`.02
`PAWP, mm Hg
`21±4
`28±4
`.02
`SVI, mL/m2
`21±2
`30+2
`.004
`Cl, L. min-1 * m-2
`2.6+0.2
`1.9+0.2
`.01
`PVR, dyne. s* cm`
`295±40
`138+23
`.002
`LVEDD, cm
`6.2+0.4
`7.1 +0.3
`.04
`V02
`11 .7±0.8
`9.6+0.1
`NS
`LVEDD indicates left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; VO2,
`peak oxygen consumption. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.
`n=19 for all parameters except EDD (n=16) and VO2 (n= 17).
`
`Hemodynamic Determinants of an Increase in
`Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure With
`Inhaled NO
`The most prominent hemodynamic effect of NO
`inhalation was the increase in pulmonary artery wedge
`pressure (median increase, 26%). In the 10 patients
`with an increase in pulmonary artery wedge pressure of
`.26% (mean increase, 33+7%), the baseline pulmo-
`nary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance,
`and LV end-diastolic dimension (by M-mode echocar-
`diography; n= 16) were higher and the cardiac index and
`stroke volume index were lower than in the 9 patients
`with an increase of <26% (Table 2). Thus, more severe
`LV dysfunction (as evidenced by higher left heart filling
`pressures, lower stroke volume, and larger LV cavity
`size) was present in the patients who had the largest
`increases in pulmonary artery wedge pressure with
`inhaled NO.
`
`R = 0.04
`P=0.87
`
`0
`
`0 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 0
`
`3
`R = 0.13
`P = 0.61
`
`1
`
`0
`
`20-
`
`0-
`
`0)
`X -20-
`
`o
`
`0
`
`0 ,
`
`e .
`
`-
`

`
`0
`
`0
`
`0 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`O
`
`O
`
`0
`O
`
`0
`
`O
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`0-
`
`0)
`c:a9 -20-
`0
`
`-
`
`-0 -
`
`-80 -
`
`-40
`
`0)
`
`c.
`
`C0
`
`-
`
`-40
`
`-20
`
`20
`
`40
`
`0
`PAWP (% change)
`Scatterplots of regression analyses depicting the relation between the change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with NO
`FIG 4.
`(vs room air) and the change in pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) (left), mean PA pressure (middle), or cardiac index (right) in
`19 patients.
`
`.
`0
`
`.
`
`20
`-20
`Mean PA Pressure (% Change)
`
`40
`
`-20
`
`-10
`20
`10
`Cardiac Index (% Change)
`
`0
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2782
`
`

`
`Loh et al
`
`Cardiovascular Effects of NO
`
`2783
`
`30
`
`20 -
`
`10
`
`o 0
`
`-10 -
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`R=0.948
`Op/0.0001
`
`.I
`
`-30
`
`-20
`
`-10
`0
`20
`10
`PAWP (% change)
`Scatterplot showing relation between the percent
`FIG 5.
`changes in pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and left
`ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) with inhaled NO in 10
`patients.
`
`30
`
`40
`
`The baseline PVR was more than twofold higher in
`the group that had the largest increases in pulmonary
`artery wedge pressure with inhaled NO (Table 2),
`suggesting that resting PVR might be a determinant or
`predictor of the response to inhaled NO. Consistent
`with this view, there was a strong correlation (r= -.713,
`P<.001) between the baseline PVR and the decrease in
`PVR with inhaled NO (Fig 6).
`As an alternative approach to this issue, we identi-
`fied a subgroup of 5 patients who had "compensated"
`LV failure, as defined by a pulmonary artery wedge
`pressure .18 mm Hg (mean, 12±2 mm Hg) and a
`cardiac index .2.5 L min- m2 (mean, 2.8+±0.3
`L - min-1 * m-2). In these patients, inhalation of NO
`has no effect on pulmonary artery wedge pressure
`(+7+3%) or PVR (+5±13%). In the remaining 14
`patients with "decompensated" LV failure (mean
`pulmonary artery wedge pressure, 30+2 mm Hg;
`mean cardiac index, 1.9±0.1 L. min-l m-2), inhala-
`tion of NO increased the pulmonary artery wedge
`pressure by 27±3% (P<.001) and decreased the PVR
`by 43±7% (P<.001).
`Effects of Inhaled NO on LV Function
`Since it has been suggested that NO can depress the
`contractile function of isolated cardiac myocytes,27 we
`considered the possibility that inhaled NO exerted a
`negative inotropic effect on the LV. A negative inotro-
`pic effect of inhaled NO was suggested by a decrease in
`stroke volume index despite an increase in pulmonary
`artery wedge pressure (Fig 7A). However, in the 10
`patients in whom it was measured, inhaled NO had no
`effect on LV peak +dP/dt, despite increasing LVEDP
`by 8±1 mm Hg (Fig 7B). LV peak -dP/dt, which
`reflects isovolumic relaxation in the absence of changes
`in loading conditions or heart rate,2829 was also not
`affected by inhaled NO (baseline, 807+140 mm Hg/s;
`NO, 800±139 mm Hg/s; P=NS; n=10).
`Discussion
`The major finding of this study is that in patients with
`reactive pulmonary arterial hypertension secondary to
`LV failure, inhalation of NO causes reciprocal changes
`in the PVR (decrease) and LV filling pressure (in-
`crease). In patients with primary pulmonary hyperten-
`sion, inhalation of NO causes a decrease in pulmonary
`artery pressure.23 In contrast, in patients with LV
`failure, we found that inhalation of NO is associated not
`with a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure, but
`rather, with an increase in LV filling pressure that
`accounts for the decrease in PVR. Preliminary reports
`from two other groups30,31 also indicate a similar effect
`of inhaled NO on LV filling pressure in patients with
`LV failure.
`The observed decrease in transpulmonary artery
`pressure gradient, particularly in the setting of no
`change or a small decrease in cardiac output, indicates
`that inhaled NO caused pulmonary vasodilation. NO
`diffuses readily through tissues, and therefore inhala-
`tion of NO may increase the concentration of NO in the
`vicinity of vascular smooth muscle cells in pulmonary
`resistance vessels, thereby exerting a direct vasodilator
`effect.
`We believe that the NO-induced increase in LV filling
`pressure is due to a small increase in LV volume that
`
`occurred secondary to an increase in pulmonary venous
`return to the LV. For a given pulmonary artery pres-
`sure, a decrease in PVR will result in an increase in the
`net driving force for LV filling. Although an increase in
`LV volume would result in increases in ejection fraction
`and stroke volume in a normal LV, in our patients LV
`function was severely depressed and may have been on
`the flat portion of the Starling relation. In addition, an
`NO-induced increase in LV volume may have increased
`the magnitude of functional mitral regurgitation that is
`present in the majority of such hearts.3233 Thus, an
`NO-induced redistribution of blood from the right
`ventricle to the LV may occur with no increase, or even
`a small decrease, in stroke volume. Since the failing LV
`often operates on the steep portion of the diastolic
`pressure/volume relation, a substantial increase in LV
`filling pressure might reflect only a small NO-induced
`increase in LV volume.
`
`40 -
`20
`
`20 -
`
`0-
`
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`r- -20
`(0
`
`0~
`
`a-40
`
`-60
`
`-80-
`
`n 1
`o
`m= -U.001
`P < 0.001
`
`0 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`500
`400
`200
`300
`100
`Baseline PVR (dyne-sec-cm-5)
`Scatterplot showing relation between the baseline pul-
`FIG 6.
`monary vascular resistance (PVR) and the percent change in
`PVR after inhalation of NO in 19 patients.
`
`600
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2783
`
`

`
`2784
`
`Circulation
`
`Vol 90, No 6 December 1994
`
`110 -
`
`105 -
`
`100 -
`
`95-
`
`90-
`
`85-
`
`80-
`
`7 -
`
`X
`(U
`
`2-
`m
`Je
`(0
`X.
`-
`C:
`
`m 70-
`(U
`o 65-
`
`60 -
`
`55 -
`
`p = 0.03
`
`] p = NS
`
`p <0.05
`
`30 r
`
`28 h
`
`CN 26
`
`E 0n E -
`
`>
`
`=0.02
`
`p p
`
`24
`
`22 F
`
`20 L
`20
`
`35
`
`so
`
`30
`
`30
`25
`PAWP (mmHg)
`PAWP (mmHg)
`FIG 7.
`Graphs showing (left) effect of inhaled NO on the relation between stroke volume index (SVI) and mean pulmonary artery wedge
`pressure (PAWP) and (right) effect of inhaled NO on the relation between left ventricular (LV) peak +dP/dt and PAWP.
`
`32
`
`34
`
`36
`
`38
`
`40
`
`The NO-induced changes in LV filling pressure and
`PVR correlated with both the baseline PVR (see Fig 6)
`and the severity of hemodynamic compromise (see
`Table 2). It was previously observed that inhaled NO
`has no hemodynamic effects in control subjects who
`have a normal PVR.34 Since the degree of reactive
`pulmonary hypertension is generally related to the
`severity of hemodynamic compromise in patients with
`LV failure, it might be anticipated that patients with
`more severe heart failure will have a more marked
`hemodynamic response to inhaled NO. To examine this
`prediction further, we compared the effects of inhaled
`NO in a subset of 5 patients with relatively compensated
`hemodynamics ("compensated group," defined by a
`pulmonary artery wedge pressure
`18 mm Hg and a
`cardiac index >2.5 L. m` m-2) and those of the re-
`maining 14 patients ("decompensated group," defined
`by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure >18 mm Hg
`and/or a cardiac index <2.5 L. m` m-2). Although the
`LV ejection fractions were comparable in the two
`groups, the baseline PVR was higher in the decompen-
`sated group (Table 2). As predicted by our hypothesis,
`the NO-induced fall in PVR (43% versus 7%) and
`increase in LV filling pressure (27% versus 0%) were
`larger in the decompensated group. Taken together,
`these observations suggest that the greater effect of
`inhaled NO in patients with decompensated LV failure
`is due to the greater degree of reactive pulmonary
`hypertension present in such patients.
`A second potential explanation for the decrease in
`transpulmonary gradient is that inhaled NO exerts a
`direct negative inotropic effect on the LV, resulting in a
`primary increase in LV filling pressure. In this scenario,
`passive pulmonary vasodilation might occur because of
`recruitment of precapillary vessels, an effect that has
`been demonstrated in animals.35 However, we feel that
`a direct negative inotropic effect of inhaled NO is less
`likely, for several reasons. First, NO is rapidly inacti-
`vated by hemoglobini and might not be expected to
`reach the coronary circulation under these conditions.
`
`Second, we observed no decrease in LV +dP/dt, a
`highly sensitive measure of changes in contractile state.
`Third, it has been shown that in humans, the intracor-
`onary infusion of nitroprusside, to donate NO to the
`myocardium, has no effect on +dP/dt and, contrary to
`our findings with inhaled NO, caused a decrease in LV
`filling pressure apparently due to an increase in ventric-
`ular distensibility.36
`An interesting corollary of these observations is that
`selective pulmonary vasodilation, in the absence of
`systemic vasodilation, may not be desirable in patients
`with severe LV failure. Clearly, inhaled NO, adminis-
`tered alone at the dose used in this study (80 ppm), may
`have adverse effects in such patients. Nevertheless, the
`ability of inhaled NO to reduce PVR selectively (ie,
`without causing systemic vasodilation), resulted in a
`unique physiological situation and thus provided the
`basis for these novel observations. Finally, on the basis
`of these observations, it is intriguing to speculate that
`an elevation in PVR may play an important adaptive
`role in patients with LV failure by limiting LV filling and
`thereby "protecting" the LV from excessive dilation,
`albeit at the expense of increased right ventricular work.
`Acknowledgments
`This study was supported in part by grants MOI-RR0088,
`HL-42539, HL-43344, and HL-48763 from the National In-
`stitutes of Health (NIH). Dr Loh is the recipient of Physician-
`Scientist Award KL-HL-02514 from the National Heart,
`Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr Colucci was a Sandoz Estab-
`lished Investigator of the American Heart Association. Dr
`Loscalzo is the recipient of a Research Career Development
`Award (HL-02273) from the NIH. We would like to thank Dr
`Eugene Braunwald for his insightful comments, Erin Graydon
`for technical assistance with NO gas administration, Dr Jeffrey
`Drazen for his generous support, the staff of the Cardiac
`Catheterization Laboratory for their help and patience, and
`Paula McColgan for expert typing.
`References
`1. Palmer RMJ, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells
`synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature. 1988;333:664-666.
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2784
`
`

`
`2. Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, Chaudhuri G.
`Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from
`artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:
`9265-9269.
`3. Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide: a novel signal transduction mechanism for
`transcellular communication. Hypertension. 1990;16:477-483.
`4. Ignarro LJ: Biological actions and properties of endothelium-
`derived nitric oxide formed and released from artery and vein. Circ
`Res. 1989;65:1-21.
`5. Ignarro LJ, Byrns RE, Wood KS. Endothelium-dependent modu-
`lation of cGMP levels and intrinsic smooth muscle tone in isolated
`bovine intrapulmonary artery and vein. Circ Res. 1987;60:82-92.
`6. Ignarro LJ, Byrns RE, Buga GM, Wood KS: Endothelium-derived
`relaxing factor from pulmonary artery and vein possesses pharma-
`cologic and chemical properties identical to those of nitric oxide
`radical. Circ Res. 1987;61:866-879.
`7. Cremona G, Dinh Xuan AT, Higenbottam TW: Endothelium-
`derived relaxing factor and the pulmonary circulation. Lung. 1991;
`169:185-202.
`8. Dinh-Xuan AT: Endothelial modulation of pulmonary vascular
`tone. Eur Respir J. 1992;5:757-762.
`9. Cremona G, Higenbottam T, Dinh Xuan AT, Wells F, Large S,
`Stewart S, Wallwork J: Influence of endothelium derived relaxing
`factor (EDRF) on basal vascular resistance in isolated perfused
`human lungs. Thorax. 1991;46:283. Abstract.
`10. Fineman JR, Crowley MR, Heymann MA, Soifer SJ. In vivo atten-
`uation of endothelium-dependent pulmonary vasodilation by
`methylene blue. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71:735 -741.
`11. Nishiwaki K, Nyhan DP, Rock P, Desai PM, Peterson WP, Pribble
`CG, Murray PA: N'w-Nitro-L-arginine and pulmonary vascular
`pressure-flow relationship in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1992;
`262:H1331-H1337.
`12. Fanburg BL: Relationship of the pulmonary vascular endothelium
`to altered pulmonary vascular resistance: state of the art. Chest.
`1988;93:101S-105S.
`13. Chand N, Altura BM: Acetylcholine and bradykinin relax intra-
`pulmonary arteries by acting on endothelial cells: role in lung
`vascular diseases. Science. 1981;213:1376-1379.
`14. Fineman JR, Chang R, Soifer SJ: EDRF inhibition augments
`pulmonary hypertension in intact newborn lambs. Am J Physiol.
`1992;262:H1365-H1371.
`15. Fineman JR, Heymann MA, Soifer SJ: No-nitro-L-arginine
`attenuates endothelium-dependent pulmonary vasodilation in
`lambs. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H1299-H1306.
`16. Cody RJ, Haas GJ, Binkley PF, Capers Q, Kelley R: Plasma
`endothelin correlates with the extent of pulmonary hypertension in
`patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1992;85:
`504-509.
`17. Francis GS, Goldsmith SR, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Cohn JN: The
`neurohumoral axis in congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med.
`1984;101:370-377.
`18. Kaiser L, Spickard RC, Olivier NB. Heart failure depresses endo-
`thelium-dependent responses in canine femoral artery. Am J
`Physiol. 1989;256:H962-H967.
`19. Drexler H, Hayoz D, Munzel T, Hornig B, Just H, Brunner HR,
`Zelis R: Endothelial function in chronic congestive heart failure.
`Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1596-1601.
`
`Loh et al
`
`Cardiovascular Effects of NO
`
`2785
`
`20. Kubo SH, Rector RS, Bank AJ, Williams RE, Heifetz SM.
`Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is attenuated in patients with
`heart failure. Circulation. 1991;84:1589-1596.
`21. Katz SD, Biasucci L, Sabba C, Strom JA, Jondeau G, Galvo M,
`Solomon S, Nikolic S, Forman R, LeJemtel TH. Impaired endo-
`thelium-mediated vasodilation in the peripheral vasculature of
`patients with congestive heart failure. JAm Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:
`918-925.
`22. Treasure CB, Vita JA, Cox DA, Fish RD, Gordon JB, Mudge GH,
`Colucci WS, St John Sutton MG, Selwyn AP, Alexander RW, Ganz
`P. Endothelium-dependent dilation of the coronary microvasculature
`is impaired in dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1990;81:772-779.
`23. Pepke-Zaba J, Higenbottam TW, Dinh Xuan AT, Stone D,
`Wallwork J: Inhaled nitric oxide as a cause of selective pulmonary
`vasodilatation in pulmonary hypertension. Lancet. 1991;338:
`1173-1174.
`24. Roberts JD Jr, Lang P, Bigatello LM, Vlahakes GJ, Zapol WM:
`Inhaled nitric oxide in congenital heart disease. Circulation. 1993;
`87:447-453.
`25. Rossaint R, Falke KJ, L6pez F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM.
`Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome.
`N Engl J Med. 1993;328:399-405.
`26. Grossman W. In: Grossman W, Baim DS, eds. Cardiac Catheter-
`ization, Angiocardiography and Intervention. 4th ed. Philadelphia,
`Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1991:105-122.
`27. Brady AJB, Warren JB, Poole-Wilson PA, Williams TJ, Harding
`SE. Nitric oxide attenuates cardiac myocyte contraction. Am J
`Physiol. 1993;H176-H182.
`28. McLaurin LP, Rolett EL, Grossman W: Impaired left ventricular
`relaxation during pacing-induced ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1973;32:
`751-757.
`29. Hirota Y: A clinical study of left ventricular relaxation. Circulation.
`1980;62:756-763.
`30. Lundin S, Kieler-Jensen N, Waagstein F, Wennmalm A: Hemo-
`dynamic effects and metabolic fate of inhaled nitric oxide in
`patients with severe congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1992;
`86(suppl I):I-770. Abstract.
`31. Semigran MJ, Cockrill BA, Kacmarek R, Thompson BT, Zapol
`WA, Dec GW, Fifer MA: Nitric oxide is an effective pulmonary
`vasodilator in cardiac transplant candidates with pulmonary hyper-
`tension. JAm Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:428A. Abstract.
`32. Keren G, Katz S, Strom J, Sonnenblick EH, LeJemtel TH. Non-
`invasive quantification of mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomy-
`opathy: correlation of two Doppler echocardiographic methods.
`Am Heart J. 1988;116:758-764.
`33. Keren G, Katz S, Strom J, Sonnenblick EH, LeJemtel TH:
`Dynamic response to load alterations and inotropic therapy in
`severe heart failure. Circulation. 1989;80:3066-313.
`34. Frostell CG, Blomquist H, Hedenstierna G, Lundberg J, Zapol
`WM: Inhaled nitric oxide reverses human hypoxic pulmonary vaso-
`constriction without causing systemic vasodilation. Anesthesiology.
`1993;78:427-435.
`35. Hakim TS, Michel RP, Chang HK: Partitioning of pulmonary
`vascular resistance in dogs by arterial and venous occlusion. Am J
`Physiol. 1982;52:710-715.
`36. Paulus WJ, Vantrimpont PJ, Shah AM: Acute effects of nitric
`oxide on left ventricular relaxation and diastolic distensibility in
`humans: assessment by bicoronary sodium nitroprusside infusion.
`Circulation. 1994;89:2070-2078.
`
`
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org/Downloaded from
`
` by guest on February 27, 2013
`
`2785

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket