throbber
.
`(cid:14)
`Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`
`Ventricular dysfunction clinical research in infants, children
`and adolescents
`
`Steven E. LipshultzU
`Di¤ision of Pediatric Cardiology, Uni¤ersity of Rochester Medical Center and Children’s Hospital at Strong, and Department of
`Pediatrics, Uni¤ersity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood A¤enue, Box 631, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`These two issues of Progress in Pediatric Cardiology comprehensively illustrate the wealth of currently available information
`on the pathophysiology of heart failure, age-related myocardial responsiveness, energy metabolism, cardiopulmonary interac-
`tions, the pressure-volume relationship, the systemic inflammatory response, the management of heart failure, pediatric
`pharmacology, the use of heart failure therapies including digoxin, ACE inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blockers, inotropic agents,
`diuretics, vasodilators, calcium sensitizers, angiotensin and aldosterone receptor blockers, growth hormone, and future gene
`therapy. The etiology and course of ventricular dysfunction in children is poorly characterized. Furthermore, many changing
`developmental properties of the pediatric myocardium and differences in the etiologies of ventricular dysfunction in children
`compared with adults are illustrated in these articles, invalidating the concept that children can safely be considered small
`adults for the purpose of understanding heart failure pathophysiology and treatment. However, these articles reveal that
`strikingly little research in children with ventricular dysfunction exists in terms of well-designed large-scale studies of the
`epidemiology or multicenter controlled clinical
`therapeutic trials. A future research agenda is proposed to improve
`understanding etiologies, course and treatment of ventricular dysfunction in children that is based on organized and funded
`cooperative groups since no one pediatric cardiac center treats enough children with a particular etiology of ventricular
`dysfunction. In conclusion, significant understanding of basic mechanisms of pediatric ventricular dysfunction and effective
`therapies for adults with ventricular dysfunction exist. A multicenter pediatric cardiac ventricular dysfunction network would
`allow improved understanding of diseases and treatments, and result in evidence-based medicine for pediatric patients with
`ventricular dysfunction. Q 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Congestive heart failure; Pediatrics; Ventricular function; Cardiomyopathy; Clinical trials
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment
`of ventricular dysfunction in infants, children, and
`adolescents have been reviewed in these two issues of
`Progress in Pediatric Cardiology. The large amount of
`work by contributors to highlight pediatric issues de-
`monstrates many unique and potentially important
`aspects of ventricular dysfunction related to children.
`
`These articles, however, also illustrate how little has
`been done thus far to understand the pathophysiology
`and pharmacotherapy of ventricular dysfunction in
`this population. This summary of where the field of
`pediatric ventricular dysfunction stands will review
`unique aspects of pediatric research, challenges in the
`study of children with ventricular dysfunction, and
`principles of pediatric ventricular dysfunction. Tre-
`mendous opportunities exist to advance our under-
`standing in this area at an unprecedented pace. How-
`ever, many obstacles need to be overcome, including
`ourselves. I was recently approached by a respected
`colleague who explained at great length why he could
`not participate in an active double-blinded, placebo-
`1058-9813r00r$ - see front matter Q 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
`(cid:14)
`.
`PII: S 1 0 5 8 - 9 8 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 - X
`
`U Tel.: q1-716-275-6096; fax: q1-716-275-7436.
`(cid:14)
`E-mail address: steve lipshultz@urmc.rochester.edu S.E. Lip-
`]
`.
`shultz .
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`1
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`quently in adults and is extremely rare in childhood.
`Yet, for children there are greater productive years
`saved by preventing symptomatic ventricular dysfunc-
`tion. There may be a higher potential for cure from
`ventricular dysfunction in children than in adults. As
`a result, the potential goal of pediatric therapy for
`ventricular dysfunction is more likely to be curative in
`intent,
`in contrast to the palliative intent of most
`adult therapies. Ventricular dysfunction in children is
`more likely to be due to genetic factors while in
`adults exogenous exposures predominate. At this time
`adult causes of ventricular dysfunction may be more
`amenable to prevention than pediatric causes.
`
`2.2. Reliance on anecdotal experience
`
`The art of learning medicine as a series of clinical
`anecdotes is important but an over reliance on anec-
`dotal experience, to the exclusion of clinical research,
`w x
`has pitfalls as well 3 .
`
`2.3. A lack of appreciation for the need to consider the
`length of subsequent sur¤i¤al to understand disease
`process and therapeutic response
`
`The longer a patient remains with LV dysfunction
`the worse the LV dysfunction becomes. Snapshot
`studies examining a high-risk population for LV dys-
`function at a single point in time are inadequate to
`state that the population is normal or non-progres-
`sive. Natural history studies of LV dysfunction are
`particularly important
`in children where we have
`found that the long length of subsequent survival
`coupled with the need of the pediatric myocardium to
`grow in response to increasing somatic growth may
`result in accelerated progressive LV dysfunction. A
`small amount of LV dysfunction early in childhood
`w
`x
`may be particularly problematic later in life 4]40 .
`
`2.4. Paucity of data
`
`(cid:14)
`The risk factors for e.g. age, sex, ethnic origin and
`.
`geographic differences and course of myocardial dys-
`function in infants, children, and adolescents have
`also been studied in a very limited fashion. Conse-
`quently, the results of studies to examine the effec-
`tiveness of therapies for the prevention, treatment, or
`beneficial alteration of the subsequent course of pedi-
`atric myocardial dysfunction are scarce. This is espe-
`cially relevant for pediatric congestive heart failure
`where essentially no prospective multicenter con-
`trolled clinical trials have occurred. Yet, the conse-
`quences of mild left ventricular dysfunction may be
`more significant than in adults and due to growth and
`length of future survival. Heart disease remains the
`leading cause of death in the United States with
`
`2 c
`
`ontrolled clinical trial of therapy for asymptomatic
`LV dysfunction in children because he just knew,
`without the benefit of a controlled clinical trial, that
`this was an effective therapy for his patients. Other
`pediatric cardiologists have lectured at national meet-
`ings stating it is sufficient
`to study, for example,
`pharmacologic agents for ventricular dysfunction in
`adults and, if benefit is found, use the drugs in chil-
`dren with the same illness without clinical trials in
`this age group. Some of the problems with this ap-
`proach are that the disease processes resulting in
`ventricular dysfunction are often different in children
`than adults. Many pediatric conditions have no close
`analogies in the adult. Secondly, the effects of the
`intervention may be unlike those seen in adults. The
`pharmacokinetics of many drugs vary with age and
`their beneficial or adverse effects are different in
`children and adults. Thirdly, children differ from
`adults. Some therapies may not be tolerated by young
`children because they are unpalatable or difficult to
`administer. A final point is that, because the an-
`tecedents of many adult diseases are thought to have
`their origins in early life, studies in very young chil-
`dren, and even antenatally, may identify strategies for
`preventing diseases which have important public
`w x
`health consequences 1 .
`Tremendous advances in pediatric cardiology with
`catheter, surgical, and diagnostic procedures have oc-
`w x
`curred during the past four decades 2 . Unfortu-
`nately, the fields of prevention, therapeutics, and de-
`cision analysis based on very limited or biased data
`for all pediatric ventricular dysfunction have not kept
`pace. A network of cardiologists willing to participate
`and adequate funding for an infrastructural network
`would facilitate research in this area.
`
`2. The current status of clinical research in pediatric
`ventricular dysfunction
`
`2.1. Reliance on data from studies in adults
`
`In many areas of pediatric practice, therapies have
`been studied only in adults, and pediatricians must
`consider whether it is appropriate to generalize from
`adult to child. Although some pediatric cardiologists
`have advocated that treatments proved effective for
`adults with myocardial dysfunction be used in pedi-
`atric patients based on data from adults this may not
`be prudent without further testing.
`There appears to be real differences in incidence,
`implications, expectations, causes, treatment styles,
`and prevention between children and adults with ven-
`tricular dysfunction suggesting that for ventricular
`dysfunction, children should not be considered ‘small
`adults’. Known ventricular dysfunction occurs fre-
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`3
`
`deaths from congestive heart failure on a steadily
`upward course.
`
`2.5. Lack of e¤idence-based medicine
`
`(cid:14)
`The emerging discipline of research synthesis evi-
`.
`dence-based healthcare has led to greater awareness
`of the need to evaluate critically what is already
`known before either making recommendations for
`clinical practice or embarking on further research
`
`w x41 . Evidence-based medicine is defined as the con-
`scientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best
`evidence in making decisions about the care of indi-
`vidual patients. By highlighting the strengths and
`weaknesses of clinical research in different speciali-
`ties, this process of critical appraisal has shown that,
`by comparison with situations in adults, research
`questions relevant to the health of children may have
`been addressed not at all or only by small, poorly
`w
`x
`designed studies 42 . Reviews of randomized trials
`published during a 15-year period in one specialist
`pediatric journal showed that sample sizes were gen-
`(cid:14)
`erally small
`less than 20 in approx. one-half of the
`.
`studies , only a small proportion were multicenter,
`and reporting of key quality indices was inadequate.
`When subspecialty areas have been reviewed, the
`conclusions have been similar. For example, one re-
`view characterized recent advances in pediatric cardi-
`ology that have led to improved outcomes for surgical
`repair of complex cardiac malformations to clinical
`trial-and-error and the common sense and accumu-
`lated wisdom of astute clinicians, rather than to basic
`w
`x
`science or epidemiology 42 . Clinical trial-and-error
`can occasionally lead to serious errors.
`The four steps involved in translating research into
`(cid:14) .
`practice include: 1 creating evidence through basic
`science research, phenotype]genotype correlations
`since different etiologies may lead to different pheno-
`typic outcomes and a heterogeneous population is of
`limited value, randomized controlled trials, and obser-
`(cid:14) .
`vational studies; 2 summarizing evidence by pub-
`(cid:14) .
`lished meta-analyses; 3 disseminating evidence by
`(cid:14) .
`clinical practice guidelines; and 4 implementing evi-
`w
`x
`dence by clinical pathways 41 .
`The clinical effectiveness of therapy comes from
`w
`x
`randomized controlled trials 43]45 . Observational
`studies have several advantages over randomized,
`controlled trials, including lower cost, greater timeli-
`ness, and a broader range of patients. Although non-
`randomized or observational studies have in the past
`been criticized for bias related to overestimating the
`true efficacy of a given therapy or leading to erro-
`neous
`conclusions,
`recent
`comparisons
`to ran-
`domized, controlled trials suggest little evidence that
`estimates of treatment effects in well-designed obser-
`(cid:14)
`vational studies with either a cohort or a case]con-
`
`.
`trol design are either consistently larger than or
`qualitatively different from those obtained in ran-
`w
`x
`43]45 . These prior
`domized,
`controlled trials
`concerns led observational studies to be limited in
`their use to the identification of risk factors and
`prognostic indicators and to situations in which ran-
`domized, controlled trials would be impossible or
`unethical.
`The clinical data for non-therapeutic questions can
`be derived from observational studies with long fol-
`low-up periods to assess prognosis and from large
`cross-sectional or cohort studies to evaluate the valid-
`w
`x
`ity and importance of diagnostic tests 41 . The valid-
`ity of a diagnostic test frequently relies on surrogate
`endpoints rather than actual patient outcomes and its
`utility is its ability to meaningfully effect patient out-
`comes. Diagnostic tests are rarely evaluated in this
`manner.
`Problems encountered in translating research into
`pediatric practice include a paucity of pediatric clini-
`cal trials, underfunding of pediatric research, lack of
`trained pediatric clinical
`investigators, frequency of
`small underpowered studies, heterogeneity of studies,
`inconsistency between meta-analyses and large ran-
`domized, controlled trials, lack of awareness of exist-
`ing efforts, access to evidence, information overload,
`format not helpful,
`labor-intensive, expensive, and
`x
`w
`waning effectiveness 41 .
`A schism exists between laboratory-based medical
`(cid:14)
`scientists who attempt to understand the biologic and
`.
`molecular processes underlying health and disease
`(cid:14)
`and epidemiologists who try to assess health and
`w
`x
`disease states outcomes in groups of human subjects,
`exposure to factors that may increase or reduce the
`likelihood of health or disease, and the causal rela-
`.
`tionship between these outcomes and exposures , as
`(cid:14)
`.
`well as between classical population-based and clini-
`.
`(cid:14)
`cal patient- and clinical intervention-based epidemi-
`w
`x
`ologists 42 .
`including cardi-
`subspecialists,
`Most pediatric
`ologists, have not acquired the methodologic skills in
`research design and statistical analysis required to
`conduct fundable, hypothesis-driven research. Good
`science requires focus, depth, and a good question.
`Rigorous methods should be coupled to substantive
`expertise to ensure that the hypothesis tested is a
`useful one. Good epidemiologic science is time-con-
`suming and often quite expensive, especially when it
`requires long-term follow-up. There are currently 1470
`US board-certified pediatric cardiologists with approx-
`imately 38 new members each year that trained in the
`w
`x
`46 certified US centers 46 . Most centers graduate
`1]2 physicians each year and over the past decade the
`percentage of all pediatric cardiology graduates
`choosing careers in full-time academic medicine has
`fallen from nearly 65 to 40%, making it more
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`cardiovascular research. A paucity of funding for such
`research, including cardiomyopathy, is related in part
`to the small number of pediatric cardiovascular scien-
`tists. According to the Manpower Advisory and Pedi-
`atric Cardiology Committees of the American College
`of Cardiology, there were -1000 certified specialists
`in pediatric cardiology in the United States in 1994,
`almost all of whom were centered on patient care and
`w
`x
`diagnostic or interventional techniques 52 . Only a
`limited number of them devoted a substantial effort
`to either clinical or basic biomedical research; fur-
`thermore, such research was largely retrospective, de-
`scriptive, and not controlled. Only 3% of responding
`certified pediatric cardiologists had completed G22
`months of research training, suggesting that
`the
`growth of basic and clinical sciences within the field is
`limited. This was similar to a prior manpower study of
`pediatric cardiology that demonstrated that 20 years
`earlier only 6% of professional activities were devoted
`w
`x
`to research 53 .
`Cooperative groups in pediatric cardiology have
`been helpful at achieving research goals. The Pedi-
`atric Cardiomyopathy Registry, for example, has in-
`creased the likelihood of collaboration and research,
`since it allows prospective capture of cases and, in this
`era of molecular biology, permits new techniques to
`be applied to the study of pediatric cardiomyopathy
`
`w x54 . It is hoped that many advances in the prevention,
`diagnosis, and treatment of cardiomyopathy in the
`young will be realized by the Registry. The field of
`pediatric cardiology has always worked well together
`on multicenter studies and registries. As evidenced by
`their publications, many of the most important clini-
`cal advances in pediatric cardiology have been done
`in the setting of multicenter studies, such as the New
`England Regional Infant Cardiac Program, the United
`States Multicenter Kawasaki Study Group, the Pedi-
`atric Cardiac Surgical Registry, the Northern Great
`Plains Regional Cardiac Program,
`the Balti-
`more]Washington Infant Study,
`the Electrophysi-
`ology Study Group, the Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty
`of Congenital Anomalies Registry, and the Pediatric
`Heart Transplantation Study Group.
`Decoding the human genome will trigger develop-
`w
`x
`ments that will change our daily lives 55]57 . The
`finding of genes responsible for diseases will require
`phenotypically well characterized populations of af-
`fected patients to determine patients whose genotypes
`reveal homogenous defects at high risk of disease and
`then to test etiology-specific therapies on these popu-
`lations. Indeed, even at this time single-nucleotide
`polymorphisms of different genes can be studied by
`CHIP technology and determine, for example, whether
`a patient with ventricular dysfunction is likely to
`decline rapidly on standard drugs for the condition,
`and hence might need more aggressive treatment.
`
`4 c
`
`oncerning whether research in pediatric cardiology
`will expand in the coming years without an organized
`w
`x
`research infrastructure 47 . An annual account of
`research grants funded by the NIH in 1998 showed
`that the number awarded on topics related to pedi-
`w
`x
`atric cardiology to be 117 48 . Yet, only nine of them
`involved a pediatric cardiologist as the project’s prin-
`w
`x
`cipal
`investigator 48 . This is occurring at a time
`when laboratory-based discoveries of new preventive
`or therapeutic interventions will continue to require
`demonstration of efficacy and safety in randomized
`trials. Although more and better epidemiologic stud-
`ies are needed, so too are laboratory investigations
`that can confirm or undermine the associations
`observed in human populations, and explain the
`biochemical and cellular processes underlying them.
`Kramer points out that the future of pediatric re-
`search will depend on the collaboration of basic scien-
`w
`x
`tists and epidemiologists 42 . He cites as an example
`the use of molecular and other biologic markers that
`cannot only provide more valid and precise measure-
`ments of potentially causal exposures and disease
`outcomes but can also be used to assess causal mech-
`w
`x
`anisms and pathways 42 .
`The 1990 US Department of Health and Human
`Services report entitled ‘Healthy People 2000’ noted
`that heart disease was among the five most common
`w
`x
`causes of death in childhood at any age 49 . An
`official policy report approved by the Board of Direc-
`tors of the American Heart Association and written
`by the Task Force on Children and Youth of the
`American Heart Association noted that cardiovascu-
`lar disease occurs more often in children than is
`w
`x
`generally appreciated 50,51 . More than 600 000 chil-
`dren in the United States have an abnormality of the
`cardiovascular system, including at least 40 000 whose
`life expectancy is shortened by an acquired disease
`such as cardiomyopathy. The annual cost of pediatric
`cardiovascular disease is )$8 billion in medical ex-
`penses and lost contributions to the gross national
`product. Cardiomyopathy accounts for an increasing
`number of the pediatric cardiac transplants. Genetic
`abnormalities in contractile proteins or energy-pro-
`ducing enzymes, among others, cause cardiomyopathy
`that becomes manifest in adulthood. Recent advances
`in genetics allow molecular diagnoses in fetal
`life.
`This report acknowledges that cardiomyopathy in
`children is increasing, and while the prevalence is
`unknown,
`‘Eventually more precise classification
`based on genetic advances will allow detection of
`people at risk and provide information about the basis
`of the disease.... With improved understanding of
`precise etiology, more effective and specific treatment
`w
`x
`can be developed’ 50,51 .
`Children represent one-third of the United States
`population, yet they are virtually unrepresented in
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`5
`
`Dr Francis Collins, director of the Human Genome
`Research Institute, recently said at the 2000 AAP
`meeting that understanding the human genome will
`result in routinely predicting and preventing diseases,
`and treating patients with highly potent designer drugs
`tailored to their own genes. Collins said ‘It’s going to
`have a profound impact on the practice of medicine
`and probably nowhere more so than in pediatrics.
`Virtually all diseases have a genetic component and
`having the genome will accelerate finding genes for
`varied diseases.’ Collins predicted that by 2010 there
`will be predictive genetic tests available for at least 10
`disorders and treatments to lower risks for several
`conditions. By 2020 he predicted gene-based designer
`drugs targeted to the molecular fingerprint of the
`patient’s problem will be available and doctors will be
`ordering genotype tests on patients before writing
`prescriptions. By 2030 Collins stated that individual-
`ized preventive medicine keyed to a person’s genetic
`profile will be routine, infants will be tested at birth,
`and gene therapy and gene-based drug therapy will be
`available.
`
`2.6. Lack of well-designed pharmaceutical industry
`sponsored studies
`
`Pharmaceutical company placebo-controlled trials
`have been inadequately performed in children in the
`(cid:14)
`.
`past. Prescriptions 25% in pediatric wards were for
`drug courses that were either unlicensed or for off-
`label uses. In neonates, only 35% of prescription
`w x
`episodes were licensed 1 . Industry objectives are
`frequently more short-term in duration or low cost
`(cid:14)
`.
`e.g. survey data assembly if possible to meet FDA
`requirements. However, a large increase in industry-
`sponsored pediatric drug trials is currently underway
`due to a new federal law and new FDA regulations
`that 2 years ago began requiring the pharmaceutical
`industry to test the effects of many adult products on
`(cid:14)
`children pediatric drug-study proposals filed with
`FDA, 1999]2000: 184, expected number completed:
`.150 . In December 2000 the FDA will require pedi-
`
`atric study of any adult disease-fighting drug that
`could be prescribed for children with the same dis-
`ease. This is expected to increase the number of US
`children in clinical drug trials from -1000 in 1990 to
`18 000 by 2002. Prior to this legislation there were
`very few pediatric drug-study proposals filed with the
`x
`. w
`(cid:14)
`FDA 1991]1997: 70, number completed: 11 58]62 .
`
`3. The necessary clinical research agenda in pediatric
`ventricular dysfunction
`
`3.1. Understanding heterogeneous etiologies in children
`
`When trying to understand the proper therapy for
`children with ventricular dysfunction it is usually im-
`portant not to view the child as a small adult and
`extrapolate the effects of ventricular dysfunction ther-
`apy for adult ischemia or post-infarction patients to
`the child where a multitude of non-ischemic, non-
`post-infarction etiologies exist. For example, in the
`article on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in
`this issue we reviewed the effects of this therapy
`based on the pathophysiology of the condition and
`w
`x
`found different reported effects of this therapy 63 . A
`is to have effective individualized, etiology-
`goal
`specific therapeutics. An individualized therapeutic
`approach, based on the etiology of ventricular dys-
`function and possibly other factors, such as drug
`levels or the levels of neurohormones, could result in
`major progress in treating these patients. We have
`examined the effect of growth hormone replacement
`therapy in pediatric LV dysfunction following anthra-
`cycline therapy over a 10-year period and found that,
`unlike adults with LV dysfunction from other etiolo-
`gies, there was not an improvement in LV dysfunction
`on growth hormone therapy compared to controls
`
`w x64 . This suggests that the etiology is extremely im-
`portant in determining whether the therapy will work.
`Similar to etiology-specific therapies for children with
`ventricular dysfunction we have utilized a similar eti-
`ology-specific preventive approach for pediatric
`
`Table 1
`Detection of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity during therapy by cause and comparison to late cardiotoxicity
`
`Cause of
`cardiotoxicity
`
`Depressed energetic
`(cid:14)
`.
`mitochondrial
`Cytokine myocardial
`depressant
`Apoptosis
`Free radical injury
`Myocarditis
`acTnT, cardiac troponin T.
`
`During therapy
`echocardiogram
`y2
`
`y2
`
`"
`y1
`y2
`
`During therapy
`a
`serum cTnT
`
`Late
`echocardiogram
`
`0
`
`0
`
`"
`Gq1
`q2
`
`"
`
`]
`
`y1
`Gy1
`Gy1
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`rate approaching 50%, suggesting that an aggressive
`approach to the diagnosis and treatment of asympto-
`(cid:14)
`.
`matic patients with DCM is clearly warranted Fig. 1 .
`Small single center series of pediatric DCM ranging
`from 24 to 81 children have suggested 14 factors
`predictive of poor outcomes: decreased LV systolic
`performance at presentation, persistent decreased LV
`systolic performance, a more spherical LV shape, an
`elevated LV end-diastolic pressure,
`increased LV
`mass, increased cardiothoracic ratio on chest radio-
`graph, mural thrombi, age )2 years, no LV hypertro-
`(cid:14)
`.
`phy by electrocardiogram EKG , endocardial fi-
`complex atrial or
`broelastosis,
`ventricular ar-
`rhythmias, persistent CHF, ST and T wave changes on
`EKG, a family history of cardiomyopathy. Most of
`these factors varied or were in conflict between these
`different studies making it impossible to understand
`risk factors for a poor prognosis in children with
`cardiomyopathy at this time. A report of 137 children
`with cardiomyopathy in Turkey from 1984 to 1989
`noted that DCM improved or normalized for 38.5%,
`
`6 p
`
`atients about to receive multiagent chemotherapy
`that includes doxorubicin. Current protocols employ
`multiagent cardioprotection targeted against specific
`etiologies of cardiotoxicity with the goal of no cardiac
`(cid:14)
`.
`injury Table 1 .
`.
`(cid:14)
`Although dilated cardiomyopathy DCM may be
`caused by )75 different disorders, the etiology in
`(cid:14)
`.
`most cases is unknown idiopathic . The course of
`DCM, almost regardless of etiology, is usually pro-
`(cid:14)
`.
`gressive Fig. 1 , with approximately 75% of these
`children dying within 5 years after the onset of symp-
`toms. Most reports give 1- and 2-year mortality esti-
`mates of 25 and 40%, respectively. The cause of death
`in approximately 80% of cases is evenly divided
`between sudden cardiac death and congestive heart
`(cid:14)
`.
`failure CHF . Some authors believe that adults who
`survive more than 2 or 3 years have relatively good
`long-term survival, but no data have been reported in
`children. However, the natural history of incidentally
`discovered, asymptomatic DCM in adults cannot be
`considered a benign diagnosis, with a 7-year mortality
`
`Fig. 1. Stages in the course of pediatric ventricular dysfunction. The identification of risk factors and high risk populations for ventricular
`dysfunction are highlighted where their use may lead to preventive or early therapeutic strategies. The determination of etiology may lead to
`etiology-specific therapies. The numbers 1]5 indicate stage-related points of intervention for preventive and therapeutic strategies and where
`biomarkers and surrogate markers may be used.
`
`IKARIA EXHIBIT 2006
`Praxair v. INO Therapeutics
`IPR2015-00525
`
`

`

`S.E. Lipshultz r Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 12 2000 1]28
`)
`(
`
`7
`
`DCM remained stable or worsened for 50%, and
`11.5% of children died; numbers that are virtually
`identical to the mean values for these parameters
`from all studies from more developed countries such
`as the United States, Canada, and England during
`similar time periods. This suggests that the enormous
`intensive and invasive resources spent on the treat-
`ment of children with DCM in more developed na-
`tions may not have had a significant impact on the
`morbidity or mortality of pediatric DCM, mandating
`the need to more completely understand the course,
`causes, factors predictive of adverse clinical outcomes,
`and newer etiology-specific therapeutics.
`We have found that, in spite of large resources and
`advanced technology, the prognosis of DCM in devel-
`oped nations is no better than in developing nations
`
`w x65 . Furthermore, there has not been a significant
`improvement in outcome for DCM in children in
`published studies over the past four decades. We have
`been involved with studies of the myocardium from
`children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy that
`specifically investigated disturbed myocardial energet-
`ics. We found a high percentage of these patients had
`abnormal mitochondrial enzyme function, mitochon-
`w
`x
`drial deletions, or mitochondrial mutations 66,67 .
`This suggests that treating all children with sympto-
`matic ventricular dysfunction in a similar fashion,
`regardless of etiology, may be detrimental since in-
`otropes, for example, may not be the most efficacious
`therapy for a child with disturbed myocardial energet-
`ics
`from mitochondrial genetic or environmental
`abnormalities.
`
`3.2. Understanding de¤elopmental differences in
`pharmacokinetics
`
`cardiovascular drug
`is known about
`Little
`metabolism in children and this has implications for
`predicting clinically important drug interactions with
`the potential for either excessive drug exposure, ef-
`fect, and toxicity or decreased drug exposure and loss
`w
`x
`of drug effect 58]62 . Historically this has been due
`to ethical, economic, regulatory, and technical issues.
`Dosing children by scaling adult doses based on body
`weight or surface area does not account for develop-
`(cid:14)
`mental changes that affect drug disposition phar-
`macokinetics or tissuerorgan sensitivity to a drug
`.
`(cid:14)
`.
`pharmacodynamics . The pharmacologic impact of
`these developmental changes is uncovered when un-
`expected or severe toxicity leads to pharmacologic
`w
`x
`studies 68,69 . Children metabolize drugs differently
`than adults. Therefore, drugs must be assessed in
`children in terms of increased risk of toxicity and
`reduced efficacy because they may act differently in
`children than in adults. We need earlier evaluation of
`
`drugs and approaches to make access available as
`soon as possible. In oncology, for example, in the past
`20 years there have been 34 new drugs approved for
`use in adult cancers, but only one new drug approved
`w
`x
`to treat cancer in children 58 . Most FDA-approved
`drugs simply state ‘safety and effectiveness in pedi-
`atric patients have not been established.’
`Some of the goals of using combination therapy in
`(cid:14) .
`children with ventricular dysfunction include: 1 To
`reduce morbidity and mortality with improved quality-
`(cid:14) .
`of-life; 2 To treat different mechanisms contributing
`(cid:14) .
`to ventricular dysfunction; 3 To treat for different
`(cid:14)
`effects e.g. drugs to prevent functional deterioration,
`drugs to reduce mortality, and drugs to control symp-
`.
`(cid:14) .
`toms ; 4 To decrease underlying disease complica-
`(cid:14) .
`tions; 5 To reduce treatment toxicity by using lower
`(cid:14) .
`(cid:14) .
`doses; 6 To increase patient compliance; 7 To
`(cid:14) .
`reduce drug dosage or dosing interval; and 8 To
`(cid:14)
`fewest drugs, fewest
`provide rational prescriptions
`.
`side effects, maximal compliance, and minimal cost .
`
`3.3. Understanding unique aspects of pediatric
`recruitment, retention, compliance, and adherence with
`clinical studies
`
`Children and their families h

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket