throbber

`
`Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Early Treatment of Persistent Pulmonary
`Hypertension of the Term Newborn: A Randomized, Double-Masked,
`Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Response, Multicenter Study
`Dennis Davidson, Elaine S. Barefield, John Kattwinkel, Golde Dudell, Michael
`Study
`Damask, Richard Straube, Jared Rhines, Cheng-Tao Chang and the I-NO/PPHN
`Group
`
` 1998;101;325Pediatrics
`
`
`The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
`located on the World Wide Web at:
`http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/101/3/325.full.html
`
`
`PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
`publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned,
`published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point
`Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy
`of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.
`
`
`
`Downloaded from Downloaded from by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`324
`
`

`

`PEDIATRICS
`䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠䡠
`
`Mar 1998
`VOL. 101
`NO. 3
`
`Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Early Treatment of Persistent Pulmonary
`Hypertension of the Term Newborn: A Randomized, Double-Masked,
`Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Response, Multicenter Study
`
`Dennis Davidson, MD*§; Elaine S. Barefield, MD*‡; John Kattwinkel, MD*¶; Golde Dudell, MD*†;
`Michael Damask, MD#; Richard Straube, MD#; Jared Rhines, BA#; Cheng-Tao Chang, PhD#; and
`the I-NO/PPHN Study Group
`
`ABSTRACT. Objectives. To assess the dose-related
`effects of inhaled nitric oxide (I-NO) as a specific adjunct
`to early conventional therapy for term infants with per-
`sistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), with regard to
`neonatal outcome, oxygenation, and safety.
`Methods. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-
`masked, dose-response, clinical trial at 25 tertiary centers
`from April 1994 to June 1996. The primary endpoint was
`the PPHN Major Sequelae Index ([MSI], including the
`incidence of death, extracorporeal membrane oxygen-
`ation (ECMO), neurologic injury, or bronchopulmonary
`dysplasia [BPD]). Patients required a fraction of inspired
`oxygen [FIO2] of 1.0, a mean airway pressure >10 cm H2O
`on a conventional ventilator, and echocardiographic evi-
`dence of PPHN. Exogenous surfactant, concomitant high-
`frequency ventilation, and lung hypoplasia were exclu-
`sion factors. Control (0 ppm) or nitric oxide (NO) (5, 20, or
`80 ppm) treatments were administered until success or
`failure criteria were met. Due to slowing recruitment, the
`trial was stopped at N ⴝ 155 (320 planned).
`Results. The baseline oxygenation index (OI) was
`24 ⴞ 9 at 25 ⴞ 17 hours old (mean ⴞ SD). Efficacy results
`were similar among NO doses. By 30 minutes (no venti-
`lator changes) the PaO2 for only the NO groups increased
`significantly from 64 ⴞ 39 to 109 ⴞ 78 Torr (pooled) and
`systemic arterial pressure remained unchanged. The
`baseline adjusted time-weighted OI was also signifi-
`cantly reduced in the NO groups (-5 ⴞ 8) for the first 24
`
`From the Departments of *Pediatrics, §Schneider Children’s Hospital, Long
`Island Jewish Medical Center, Long Island Campus for the Albert Einstein
`College of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York; the ‡University of Ala-
`bama, Birmingham, Alabama; the ¶University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
`Virginia; †San Diego Children’s Hospital, San Diego, California; and #Ohm-
`eda, PPD, Liberty Corner, New Jersey.
`Members of the I-NO/PPHN Study Group are listed in the Appendix.
`Received for publication Oct 8, 1997; accepted Dec 11, 1997.
`Reprint requests to (D.D.) Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Schnei-
`der Children’s Hospital, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde
`Park, NY 11040.
`PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 1998 by the American Acad-
`emy of Pediatrics.
`
`hours of treatment. The MSI rate was 59% for the control
`and 50% for the NO doses (P ⴝ .36). The ECMO rate was
`34% for control and 22% for the NO doses (P ⴝ .12).
`Elevated methemoglobin (>7%) and nitrogen dioxide
`(NO2) (>3 ppm) were observed only in the 80 ppm NO
`group, otherwise no adverse events could be attributed to
`I-NO, including BPD.
`Conclusion. For term infants with PPHN, early I-NO
`as the sole adjunct to conventional management pro-
`duced an acute and sustained improvement in oxygen-
`ation for 24 hours without short-term side effects (5 and
`20 ppm doses), and the suggestion that ECMO use may
`be reduced. Pediatrics 1998;101:325–334; extracorporeal
`membrane oxygenation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia,
`neonatal outcome, methemoglobinemia, nitrogen dioxide.
`
`ABBREVIATIONS. PPHN, persistent pulmonary hypertension of
`the newborn; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
`I-NO, inhaled nitric oxide; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia;
`NO2, nitrogen dioxide; ppm, parts per million; MSI, Major Se-
`quelae Index; RAD, reactive airway disease; Fio2, fraction of in-
`spired oxygen; NO, nitric oxide; TWOI, time-weighted oxygen-
`ation index; OI, oxygenation index.
`
`Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the new-
`
`born (PPHN) is a syndrome of acute respira-
`tory failure, characterized by systemic hypox-
`emia associated with extrapulmonary shunting of
`venous blood and evidence of elevated levels of pul-
`monary artery pressure in the absence of congenital
`heart disease. This syndrome is seen more commonly
`in term infants who have underlying diseases such as
`meconium aspiration, respiratory distress syndrome,
`sepsis, or lung hypoplasia, or it may be idiopathic
`PPHN.1,2 In the United States, approximately 10 000
`newborns per year suffer from PPHN.3,4 The diagno-
`sis of PPHN is usually made by 24 hours after birth
`and most patients are born at hospitals without ex-
`tracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).4
`
`Downloaded from
`
`PEDIATRICS Vol. 101 No. 3 March 1998
`
`
` by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`325
`
`325
`
`

`

`The standard therapy for PPHN typically includes
`conventional mechanical ventilation, oxygen, seda-
`tion, paralysis, alkalosis, inotropic support, intrave-
`nous vasodilators, and antibiotics.4,5 In 1994, the ef-
`ficacy and safety of surfactant and high-frequency
`ventilation for PPHN were unproven, and the use of
`these therapies was becoming more widespread, be-
`fore resorting to ECMO.4–7 However, previous case
`series indicated that inhaled nitric oxide (I-NO) im-
`proved oxygenation acutely by selective pulmonary
`vasodilation.8,9 Therefore, the overall hypothesis for
`the present study was that early use of I-NO could
`reduce inspired oxygen and conventional ventilator
`requirements. This, in turn, might lead to less sec-
`ondary lung injury due to the inflammatory effects of
`hyperoxia and barotrauma, a process that begins
`within 24 hours10,11 and may be deleterious to out-
`come. Accordingly, the first objective of this trial was
`to determine if early I-NO therapy would reduce the
`overall incidence of death, need for ECMO, neuro-
`logic sequelae, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia
`(BPD).
`At the start of this study, data from animal and
`human studies had not indicated what was the most
`safe and effective dose of prolonged I-NO for
`PPHN.12–15 The secondary objective of this trial was
`to determine if there was dose-related efficacy, met-
`hemoglobinemia, inspired nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
`levels, intracranial hemorrhage, or unsuspected ad-
`verse effects of I-NO in the neonatal period.16 There-
`fore, eligibility requirements were defined narrowly
`and potentially confounding, and investigational res-
`cue treatments, such as high-frequency ventilation
`and surfactant, were prohibited.
`
`METHODS
`This clinical trial was a randomized, double-masked, placebo-
`controlled, dose-response study. Twenty-five neonatal intensive
`care units enrolled patients; fifteen of the sites were ECMO cen-
`ters. The protocol, protocol amendments and each institution’s
`Informed Consent forms were approved by the local Institutional
`Review Board before patient enrollment. Written informed con-
`sent was obtained for each patient before enrollment. Equipment,
`treatment gases and funding based on patient recruitment at each
`site was provided by Ohmeda, PPD (Liberty Corner, NJ).
`
`Hypotheses
`The primary hypothesis was that a fixed dose of I-NO at either
`5, 20, or 80 parts per million (ppm), delivered to term infants with
`PPHN, would reduce the PPHN Major Sequelae Index (MSI) by
`30%. This composite endpoint included the incidence of death,
`ECMO, neurologic sequelae in the neonatal period, or broncho-
`pulmonary dysplasia/reactive airway disease (BPD/RAD). Neu-
`rologic sequelae in the neonatal period were defined as clinical or
`electroencephalogram-proven seizures or an abnormal cranial im-
`aging study (demonstrating either hemorrhage, infarct, or other
`diagnoses) during the neonatal hospitalization. BPD was defined
`as the need for supplemental oxygen at 28 days after birth with a
`concurrent abnormal chest x-ray. RAD was defined as the need for
`bronchodilator therapy at discharge from the nursery.
`Secondary hypotheses were that I-NO would: 1) produce a
`sustained improvement in oxygenation during the first 24 hours of
`treatment, 2) reduce the incidence of treatment failures due to
`hypoxemia and/or hypotension leading to institution of other
`forms of rescue therapy, and 3) reduce days on the ventilator, on
`supplemental oxygen, and length of hospital stay.
`It was also hypothesized that there would be no increase in
`adverse events experienced by the neonates receiving I-NO as
`measured by methemoglobin levels, inspired NO2 levels, worsen-
`
`ing of primary or secondary efficacy outcome measures, delay in
`initiating rescue therapy, adverse events described by the inves-
`tigators, or abnormalities in clinical hematologic and biochemical
`blood studies. A separate comprehensive 1-year follow-up study
`was designed to examine the general pediatric, neurodevelopmen-
`tal, and audiologic outcomes.
`
`Patient Entry Criteria
`Term infants (ⱖ37 weeks gestation) with birth weights of
`ⱖ2500 g requiring mechanical ventilation having a fraction of
`inspired oxygen (Fio2) of 1.0 were eligible within 72 hours of birth.
`Small for gestational age infants with birth weights of ⱖ2000 g
`were included if the gestational age was assessed to be ⱖ39 weeks.
`On study entry, an Infant Star conventional ventilator (Infrasonics,
`Inc, San Diego, CA) was used, with a continuous flow rate be-
`tween 10 and 15 L/min. Intermittent mandatory ventilator rates
`⬎100 breaths/minute and inverse inspiratory to expiratory ratios
`were not permitted. For study entry, patients required an arterial
`blood gas with a Pao2 of ⱖ40 and ⱕ100 Torr drawn from an
`indwelling postductal arterial catheter when the mean airway
`pressure was ⱖ10 cm H2O and the Fio2 was 1.0. They also required
`a color Doppler echocardiogram with evidence of PPHN or a
`preductal versus postductal transcutaneous O2 saturation gradient
`of ⱖ10%. The following were considered echocardiographic evi-
`dence of PPHN: 1) a right-to-left or bidirectional ductal shunt, or
`2) if the ductus was closed, a right-to-left or bidirectional foramen
`ovale shunt with either a tricuspid insufficiency jet with an esti-
`mated systolic pulmonary artery pressure ⱖ75% of systolic aortic
`pressure or posterior systolic bowing of the interventricular sep-
`tum. Before starting the treatment gas, the patient had to have a
`chest x-ray within 12 hours and a head ultrasound within 24
`hours. A standardized history and physical examination were
`required. Preductal and postductal transcutaneous O2 saturations
`were obtained with all arterial blood gas samples.
`Exclusion criteria were lung hypoplasia syndromes, congenital
`heart disease (other than a small, hemodynamically insignificant
`ventricular septal defect) as determined by echocardiography,
`intracranial hemorrhage ⱖgrade 2, uncorrected polycythemia (he-
`matocrit ⱖ70%), mean systemic arterial pressure ⬍35 Torr, a lethal
`syndrome, a suspected or confirmed chromosomal abnormality,
`use of intravenous vasodilators after entry criteria were met at the
`study site, uncontrollable coagulopathy or serious bleeding, and
`enrollment in any other investigational drug or interventional
`study. Patients were excluded if they had received previous or
`concomitant surfactant therapy. Patients who received a trial of
`high-frequency ventilation within 6 hours before starting the treat-
`ment gas were also ineligible.
`
`Masking Procedures and Randomization
`Strict masking procedures and personnel designations were
`approved by the steering committee before a site enrollment.
`Clinical investigators remained masked to the group assignment
`through the 1-year follow-up for all patients in the study. The
`clinical investigator managed patient care, assured compliance to
`the protocol, and assigned adverse events.
`The site’s unmasked laboratory investigator randomized pa-
`tients to a placebo or nitric oxide (NO) dose group from a scratch
`off card. The randomization was blocked for each site in a block
`size of four patients allocated to one of the four treatment gases.
`The laboratory investigator set up, calibrated, and operated the
`I-NO delivery device and measured methemoglobin. All sites
`used Ciba-Corning 270 Co-oximeters (Ciba Corning Diagnostics
`Corporation, Medford, MA) for methemoglobin levels.
`
`Baseline Procedures
`As soon as the patient was randomized, baseline hemody-
`namic, ventilator, and blood gas analyses were obtained at three
`time points 15 to 30 minutes apart. A baseline methemoglobin
`level was also obtained. If the patient met entry criteria at the first
`two time points, the Fio2 was reduced to 0.95, and the third
`baseline measurement was obtained. If the Pao2 remained ⱖ40
`and ⱕ100 Torr, treatment gas was begun immediately. A patient
`who failed baseline criteria was allowed one additional opportu-
`nity to meet baseline oxygen criteria if deemed stable by the
`clinical investigator.
`The following laboratory studies were also obtained before
`
`326
`
`EARLY INHALED NITRIC OXIDE FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
`Downloaded from
` by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`
`326
`
`

`

`starting the treatment gas: a complete blood count, serum creati-
`nine, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin,
`alkaline phosphatase, lactic acid dehydrogenase, serum glutamic-
`oxaloacetic transaminase, total calcium, inorganic phosphorous,
`uric acid, and glucose.
`
`I-NO Delivery
`The I-NO delivery system (Ohmeda, PPD, Madison, WI) was
`designed expressly to deliver NO mixed with nitrogen, or nitro-
`gen alone (BOC Specialty Gases, Port Allen, LA) into the inspira-
`tory limb of the ventilator circuit using a mass flow controller. A
`sample gas catheter was attached to the inspiratory limb of the
`ventilator immediately before the patient connection. Electro-
`chemical detectors attached to the delivery device provided a
`continuous measurement of NO and NO2 (model EC90 NO mon-
`itor and model EC40 NO2 monitor, Bedfont Scientific Ltd, Kent,
`England). The accuracy of NO measurement for values between 0
`to 5 ppm was ⫾ 0.5 ppm and for 5 to 80 ppm, was ⫾ 2 ppm,
`regardless of the Fio2.17 Validation was performed by using a
`known standard, blended by mass flow controllers and verified by
`chemiluminescence (error of ⫾ 1%). Electrochemical cell analyzers
`for NO2 have been shown to over estimate NO2 levels, due to the
`formation of NO2 in the sampling circuit.18 In the presence of
`oxygen, the NO2 monitor overestimates by 1.2 ppm at 80 ppm of
`NO, 0.3 ppm at 40 ppm of NO, and 0.1 ppm at 20 ppm of NO.
`Verification was performed using a selective NO2 ultraviolet ab-
`the NO2 analyzers was
`sorbance analyzer. The linearity of
`within ⫾ 3%.
`On randomization, the laboratory investigator calibrated the
`delivery device with standard concentrations of NO (112 ppm) in
`nitrogen and NO2 (7.2 ppm) in nitrogen. The I-NO delivery device
`mixed the NO source gas 1:20 with ventilator gas. To deliver NO
`at doses of 0, 5, 20, and 80 ppm, source tanks of 0, 100, 400, and
`1600 ppm of NO, balance N2, were used. Because delivery of any
`treatment gas diluted the ventilator gas by 5%, the maximal Fio2
`delivered to the patient was 0.95. Therefore, patients were placed
`on an Fio2 setting of 0.95 before starting treatment gas. The ven-
`tilator Fio2 setting was increased to 1.0 when the treatment gas
`was started. As a result, an Fio2 of 0.95 was delivered on initiation
`of the treatment gas for all groups.
`
`Protocol for Management During Treatment Gas
`Administration
`No Fio2 or ventilator changes were to be made over the first
`half hour of treatment gas. High-frequency jet and oscillatory
`ventilation were not permitted. Ventilator settings, heart rate,
`blood pressure, and postductal arterial blood gases, preductal and
`postductal transcutaneous oxygen saturations, inspired gas levels,
`and methemoglobin levels were obtained at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and then
`every 4 hours or as needed while on 100% treatment gas. Patients
`were not permitted to receive treatment gas for ⬎14 days.
`Study patients received a fixed dose of either 0, 5, 20, or 80 ppm
`of NO until one of four events occurred: 1) a treatment success was
`achieved, based on improved oxygenation (Pao2 ⱖ60 Torr, Fio2
`⬍0.6, and mean airway pressure ⬍10 cm H2O); 2) a treatment
`failure resulted, based on a decrease of Pao2 ⬍40 Torr for 30
`minutes in the absence of a reversible mechanical problem, a mean
`systemic arterial pressure ⬍35 Torr, the patient reached the site’s
`ECMO criteria, 14 days of treatment gas had elapsed, or if remain-
`ing in the study was not in the best interest due to cardiopulmo-
`nary instability or local ECMO criteria that was not covered by the
`study’s failure criteria; 3) inspired NO2 levels were ⬎3 ppm for 30
`minutes19; or 4) a methemoglobin level that exceeded 7%. All
`patients, whether treatment successes or failures, were included in
`the data analyses.
`For treatment successes and failures, the protocol permitted
`sequential 20% decrements in treatment gas at a minimum of 30
`minutes and maximum of 4 hours. Ventilator settings, an arterial
`blood gas, preductal and postductal transcutaneous saturations,
`inspiratory gas levels, and vital signs were required immediately
`before and 30 minutes after a 20% reduction. During this half hour
`period, it was requested that no ventilator change be made unless
`the Pao2 became ⬍40 Torr. If this level of hypoxemia occurred on
`a reduction, the treatment gas could be increased 20%. The wean-
`ing process would begin again when the criteria for success were
`met or in the case of a treatment failure, the treatment gas would
`have to be discontinued before other rescue therapy was begun.
`
`Treatment gas could not be re-instituted and no other investiga-
`tional drug or intervention was permitted. I-NO for treatment
`failures was not permitted.
`For patients with elevated methemoglobin and inspired NO2
`levels based on the protocol definitions, treatment gas could be
`continued at a lower level (one of the 20% decrements) if the
`methemoglobin or NO2 levels dropped below threshold levels.
`
`Posttreatment Gas Data
`A methemoglobin level was obtained 2 hours after the treat-
`ment gas was discontinued. The baseline complete blood count
`and blood chemistries were repeated within 12 hours of discon-
`tinuing the treatment gas. A repeat head ultrasound, computer-
`ized axial tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging was re-
`quired before discharge. A bilateral evoked response hearing
`screen was obtained before discharge. A chest x-ray was per-
`formed on day 28 if the patient still required supplemental oxygen.
`
`Safety Monitoring
`An independent data safety and monitoring board was com-
`posed of statisticians and pediatric specialists. An interim, blinded
`safety analysis was performed after data from 100 patients were
`obtained.
`
`Sample Size and Statistics
`We estimated the incidence of PPHN major sequelae before the
`start of this trial by a retrospective survey of seven sites. Data were
`obtained on 107 patients who would have been eligible for the
`present study. The incidences of the major sequelae were: death,
`8%; ECMO, 36%; neonatal neurologic sequelae 20%; and BPD, 5%.
`To determine if NO could reduce PPHN major sequelae by 30% (␣
`level ⫽ 0.05, ␤ level ⫽ 0.2), a total of 320 patients (80 in each of 4
`groups) were required. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel ␹2 test was
`used for discrete or categorical data, such as PPHN major sequelae
`(death, ECMO, neurologic sequelae, BPD, or composite), treat-
`ment failures due to cardiopulmonary instability, and adverse
`events by organ systems. Fisher’s exact test was used if the fre-
`quencies were small.
`The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze continuous
`variables (eg, the time-weighted oxygenation index [TWOI], du-
`ration of supplemental oxygen, acute change in Pao2, or methe-
`moglobin levels). For ventilatory and hemodynamic data, baseline
`was considered as the third qualifying time point (Fio2 ⫽ 0.95)
`immediately before starting the treatment gas. A two-tailed t test
`was used only for the change from baseline for the clinical hema-
`tologic and biochemical variables. The significance level for all
`tests was set at 0.05. There was no ␣level adjustment for pairwise
`comparisons performed in the study. The incidence of adverse
`events was tabulated using the COSTART body system classifica-
`tion.20
`One of the major secondary endpoints of this study was to
`determine whether I-NO produced a sustained improvement in
`oxygenation. Therefore, we prospectively defined the TWOI as the
`change in oxygenation index (OI) from the individual’s baseline
`OI over time, divided by the duration on treatment gas up to 24
`hours. This method adjusts for attrition from treatment failure or
`success. If the patient worsened from his/her own baseline, the
`TWOI would be a positive number. If the patient improved, the
`index would be a negative number as shown in Fig 1.
`
`RESULTS
`Enrollment began in April 1994. One hundred
`fifty-five patients were enrolled. The trial was halted
`in June 1996 because of slow recruitment. The accrual
`goal was 320 patients.
`
`Patients Screened and Patients Enrolled
`A total of 1282 patients were screened. The most
`common conditions preventing enrollment were: ox-
`ygenation outside the eligible range (26%) and lack
`of echocardiographic evidence of PPHN (19%). Sur-
`factant
`therapy (12%), high-frequency ventilation
`(9%), prematurity (8%), lung hypoplasia syndromes
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
` by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`ARTICLES
`
`327
`
`327
`
`

`

`TABLE 2.
`
`Baseline Ventilatory Status
`Variable
`Control Group
`(n ⫽ 41)
`
`0.95 ⫾ 0
`14 ⫾ 4
`
`59 ⫾ 16
`25 ⫾ 10
`
`Nitric Oxide
`Groups
`(n ⫽ 114)
`0.95 ⫾ 0
`14 ⫾ 3
`
`64 ⫾ 39
`24 ⫾ 9
`
`Fio2
`Mean airway pressure
`(cm H2O)
`Pao2 (Torr)
`Oxygenation index
`(cm H2O/Torr)
`Arterial/alveolar Po2
`ratio
`pH
`Paco2 (Torr)
`Intermittent mandatory
`ventilation (breaths/min)
`Peak inspiratory pressure
`(cm H2O)
`Positive end expiratory
`pressure (cm H2O)
`Values are mean ⫾ SD at 25 ⫾ 17 hours after birth.
`
`the time-weighted oxygenation index
`Fig 1. Calculation of
`(TWOI) as a measure of the change in oxygenation over time by a
`treatment gas (control or NO) in term infants with PPHN. The
`black area is the change in the OI from the baseline OI over the
`duration of the treatment gas or 24 hours, whichever came first.
`The area is divided (weighted) by time. In this theoretical exam-
`ple, the patient had a negative TWOI indicating an improvement
`in oxygenation over time.
`
`(8%), and age ⬎72 hours (5%) were the other condi-
`tions preventing enrollment.
`A total of 8 patients, 2 in the control group and 6 in
`the NO groups were erroneously enrolled. All pa-
`tients were included in the efficacy and safety anal-
`yses. Of the 155 randomized patients, the number of
`patients who received treatment in each group (0, 5,
`20, and 80 ppm) were 41, 41, 36, and 37 respectively.
`
`Baseline Patient Profile
`Baseline variables were similar among treatment
`groups. Baseline data are presented (Tables 1 and 2)
`for the control group (N ⫽ 41) and the pooled I-NO
`group (N ⫽ 114). The majority of patients were de-
`livered by cesarean section (62%) and at hospitals
`other than the study site (over 90%). Most infants
`(77%) received conventional mechanical ventilation
`and 5% received high-frequency jet or oscillatory
`ventilation before admission to the study site. Un-
`derlying conditions associated with PPHN were also
`well-balanced among treatment groups with a ma-
`jority of patients diagnosed with meconium aspira-
`
`TABLE 1.
`
`Patient Profile
`Trait
`
`Control
`Group
`(n ⫽ 41)
`3.4 ⫾ 0.5
`39.7 ⫾ 1.8
`7 ⫾ 2
`26 ⫾ 18
`27 (66)
`
`Birth weight, kg*
`Gestational age, wk*
`5-Min Apgar Score, no. *‡
`Age, start 嗱 gas, h*
`Male sex, no. (%)
`Race, no. (%)
`Black
`Hispanic
`White
`Other
`Cesarean section, no. (%)†
`Inborn, no. (%)
`Primary diagnosis, no. (%)
`Meconium aspiration syndrome
`Sepsis
`Idiopathic PPHN
`Respiratory distress syndrome
`Other
`* Values are mean ⫾ SD.
`† One patient has missing information.
`‡ Two patients have missing information.
`
`11 (27)
`10 (24)
`20 (49)
`0 (0)
`25 (61)
`3 (7)
`
`26 (63)
`13 (32)
`5 (12)
`4 (10)
`5 (12)
`
`Nitric Oxide
`Groups
`(n ⫽ 114)
`3.4 ⫾ 0.5
`39.8 ⫾ 1.6
`7 ⫾ 2
`25 ⫾ 17
`58 (51)
`
`25 (22)
`20 (18)
`59 (52)
`10 (9)
`70 (62)
`12 (11)
`
`60 (53)
`30 (26)
`24 (21)
`13 (11)
`22 (19)
`
`0.09 ⫾ 0.02
`
`0.10 ⫾ 0.06
`
`7.48 ⫾ 0.12
`33 ⫾ 10
`59 ⫾ 15
`
`7.50 ⫾ 0.11
`30 ⫾ 9
`59 ⫾ 15
`
`33 ⫾ 6
`
`5 ⫾ 2
`
`32 ⫾ 6
`
`5 ⫾ 1
`
`tion. Although there were more patients with idio-
`pathic PPHN in the NO groups compared with
`placebo, this was not statistically significant. Seizures
`were documented in 17% of the control patients and
`20% of the patients who went on to receive NO.
`Abnormal head ultrasounds, almost all due to low-
`grade intracranial hemorrhages, were demonstrated
`in 10% of the control patients and 5% of the pooled
`NO patients.
`The baseline ventilatory (Table 2) and hemody-
`namic conditions were also very similar between
`control and NO groups. The patients required high
`levels of conventional ventilatory support. The base-
`line inspiratory Fio2 for all patients was 0.95 by pro-
`tocol. Systolic, mean, and diastolic, systemic arterial
`pressures were 67 ⫾ 13, 53 ⫾ 10, and 44 ⫾ 10 Torr,
`respectively. Dopamine and/or dobutamine (to a
`lesser extent) were used in 76% and 74% of the
`control and the pooled NO group, respectively, at the
`start of the treatment gas. Most patients had echo-
`cardiographic evidence for PPHN; only 9% were di-
`agnosed by preductal versus postductal oxygen sat-
`uration difference of ⬎10%. The mean preductal and
`postductal transcutaneous oxygen saturations were
`similar for all groups; for the control group the sat-
`urations were 93.6 ⫾ 3.0% and 93.2% ⫾ 4.1%, respec-
`tively.
`
`Acute Changes in Blood Gases, pH, and
`Hemodynamics
`The acute changes in Pao2 after the first half hour
`of treatment gas, on stable ventilator settings are
`shown in Fig 2. There was a statistically significant
`increase in Pao2 from baseline for each NO group
`compared with control. Although a higher mean
`Pao2 was observed for the 80 ppm dose, this was not
`statistically different from the other NO doses. The
`corresponding OIs at 30 minutes for each group from
`lowest to highest NO dose were 24 ⫾ 14, 20 ⫾ 11,
`21 ⫾ 13, and 15 ⫾ 10; the pooled NO value was 19 ⫾
`11 (cm H2O/Torr). There were no appreciable differ-
`ences between and within groups for pH, Paco2, or
`ventilator settings at 30 minutes compared with
`
`328
`
`EARLY INHALED NITRIC OXIDE FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
`Downloaded from
` by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`
`328
`
`

`

`Fig 2. Acute change in Pao2 during the first half hour of treat-
`ment gas administration (control⫽ NO at 0 ppm) to term infants
`with PPHN. During this period, there were no changes in the Fio2
`or conventional ventilator settings.
`
`baseline. At 30 minutes for control and pooled NO
`groups respectively, the pH was 7.49 ⫾ 0.11 and
`7.52 ⫾ 0.12, the Paco2 was 32 ⫾ 71 and 29 ⫾ 10 Torr,
`the peak inspiratory pressure for both groups was
`33 ⫾ 6 cm H2O, the ventilator rate was 59 ⫾ 15 and
`58 ⫾ 14 breaths/minute, and the positive end expi-
`ratory pressure was 5.1 ⫾ 1.6 and 5.0 ⫾ 1.2 cm H2O.
`Systolic, mean, and diastolic systemic arterial pres-
`sures, as well as heart rate, remained steady during
`the first half hour of treatment gas. The mean arterial
`blood pressure for the 0, 5, 20, and 80 ppm groups at
`30 minutes of treatment gas were 54 ⫾ 9, 52 ⫾ 9, 50 ⫾
`9, and 50 ⫾ 10 Torr; the value for the pooled NO
`group was 51 ⫾ 9 Torr. The corresponding heart
`rates at 30 minutes, from the lowest (control) to
`highest NO dose were 151 ⫾ 20, 151 ⫾ 24, 155 ⫾ 27,
`and 155 ⫾ 24 beats/minute; the value for the pooled
`NO group was 154 ⫾ 25 beats/minute. Blood pres-
`sure and heart rate data were similar for all groups
`during administration of the treatment gas.
`
`Secondary Outcomes
`The TWOI corrected from baseline was used as a
`measure of a sustained improvement in oxygenation.
`Figure 3 demonstrates that the TWOI improved (neg-
`ative number) for all NO groups. For the control
`group, this index was not statistically improved from
`baseline. There was a highly significant reduction in
`the baseline-adjusted, TWOI for the pooled NO
`group compared with placebo.
`The incidence of any treatment failure for the con-
`trol group was 37% and for the 5, 20, and 80 ppm NO
`doses, 29%, 28%, and 59%, respectively, (the pooled
`value for NO subjects was 39%). The higher inci-
`dence of treatment gas failures in the 80 ppm group
`was related primarily to methemoglobinemia (13 of
`37, 35%) and elevated NO2 levels (7 of 37, 19%). The
`incidence of treatment failures due to cardiopulmo-
`nary instability (hypoxemia or hypotension criteria)
`
`Fig 3. The time-weighted oxygenation index (TWOI) over 24
`hours or duration of the treatment gas (control ⫽ NO at 0 ppm)
`whichever came first, for term infants with PPHN. A negative
`TWOI indicates a sustained improvement in oxygenation from the
`baseline OI of each treatment group.
`
`was reduced by NO (control 34%, the pooled value
`for NO subjects was 25%), but this result did not
`reach statistical significance (P ⫽ .29); the incidences
`of treatment failures for each group were 34%, 27%,
`25%, and 24% for 0, 5, 20, and 80 ppm NO groups,
`respectively. Hypoxemia was the principal cause of
`treatment failure due to cardiopulmonary instability.
`Only 3 patients were classified as treatment failures
`due to hypotension, 2 in the 5 ppm and 1 in the 80
`ppm NO groups. The frequency of premature dis-
`continuation of treatment gas when the investigator
`felt it was in the best interest of the patient (eg,
`immediate rescue therapy was needed) was 20% for
`the control group and 18% for the pooled NO group.
`One patient in the placebo group had the treatment
`gas discontinued because of a malfunction in the
`inspiratory gas monitor. For patients classified as
`treatment failures based on hypoxemia and/or hy-
`potension, the incidence of rescue therapy for pla-
`cebo and the pooled I-NO group, respectively, were:
`ECMO (71% and 48%), high-frequency oscillatory
`ventilation (64% and 72%), surfactant (36% and 45%),
`and vasodilator therapy (36% and 21%).
`The duration of treatment gas, mechanical ventila-
`tion, supplemental oxygen, ECMO, and hospitaliza-
`tion are shown in Table 3. These results give a de-
`scriptive view of the hospital course but are difficult
`to analyze because of the issue of dropouts in both
`the placebo and NO groups. Patients generally re-
`ceived the treatment gas for about 21⁄2 days. The
`mean durations on treatment gas for patients with
`treatment success were 107.4, 95.4, 72.2, and 65.1
`hours for the control, 5, 20, and 80 ppm groups,
`respectively. Thus, among treatment successes, it ap-
`peared that there was a dose-response trend in du-
`ration of treatment gas. Patients who became treat-
`ment failures due to cardiopulmonary instability had
`gas discontinued at similar times in the control
`group (9.9 ⫾ 11.0 h) and the NO groups (10.0 ⫾
`12.7 h). The mean TWOIs for the treatment failures
`due to cardiopulmonary instability were ⫹1.25 in the
`control group and ⫹1.49 in the NO group; this was
`not statistically different. The mean OI at the time a
`patient was declared a treatment failure due to car-
`diopulmonary instability was 52.7 ⫾ 16.3 and 43.2 ⫾
`
`
`
`Downloaded from by guest on September 17, 2014pediatrics.aappublications.org
`
`
`
`ARTICLES
`
`329
`
`329
`
`

`

`TABLE 3.
`
`Duration of Treatment*
`Treatment Gas
`
`Control Group
`(n ⫽ 41)
`
`Nitric Oxide Groups
`(n ⫽ 114)
`
`P Value㛳
`
`Treatment gas (h)
`All patients
`Until success: weaning criteria†
`Until failure: cardiopulmonary instability‡
`Time to ECMO (h)
`Duration of ECMO (h)
`Mechanical ventilation (h)
`Supplemental oxygen (h)
`All patients
`Success: weaning criteria†
`Failure: cardiopulmonary instabi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket