throbber
MS 1118
`MS 1118
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 229 PageID #: 40748
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`660
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`LUFKIN DIVISION
`
`DOCKET 9:09CV111
`
`JUNE 27, 2011
`
`1:00 P.M.
`
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`||||| ||
`
`PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC
`
`VS.
`
`APPLE, INC., ET AL
`
`--------------------------------------------------------
`
`VOLUME 3 OF __, PAGES 660 THROUGH 888
`
`REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL
`
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE RON CLARK
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
`
`--------------------------------------------------------
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
`
`RONALD J. SCHUTZ
`JACOB M. HOLDREITH
`CYRUS A. MORTON
`ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI - MN
`800 LASALLE AVENUE
`SUITE 2800
`MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
`
`55402
`
`ANNIE HUANG
`ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI - NY
`601 LEXINGTON AVENUE
`SUITE 3400
`NEW YORK, NEW YORK
`
`10022
`
`LAWRENCE LOUIS GERMER
`GERMER GERTZ
`550 FANNIN
`SUITE 400
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`77701
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 229 PageID #: 40749
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`FOR THE DEFENDANTS:
`
`661
`
`RUFFIN B. CORDELL
`FISH & RICHARDSON - WASHINGTON DC
`1425 K STREET NW
`SUITE 1100
`WASHINGTON, DC
`
`20005
`
`GARLAND T. STEPHENS
`BENJAMIN C. ELACQUA
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`1221 MCKINNEY
`28TH FLOOR
`HOUSTON, TEXAS
`
`77010
`
`KELLY C. HUNSAKER
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`500 ARGUELLO STREET
`SUITE 500
`REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA
`
`94063
`
`JUSTIN BARNES
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`12390 EL CAMINO REAL
`SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
`
`92130
`
`J. THAD HEARTFIELD
`THE HEARTFIELD LAW FIRM
`2195 DOWLEN ROAD
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`77706
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`CHRISTINA L. BICKHAM, CRR, RMR
`FEDERAL OFFICIAL REPORTER
`300 WILLOW, SUITE 221
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`77701
`
`PROCEEDINGS REPORTED USING COMPUTERIZED STENOTYPE;
`TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED VIA COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSCRIPTION.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`MS 1118 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 3 of 229 PageID #: 40750
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`INDEX
`
`662
`
`CONTINUED DIRECT EXAM OF KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`CONCORDANCE INDEX
`
`INDEX OF EXHIBITS
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Exhibit 748
`
`Exhibit 744
`
`PX-187
`
`Exhibit 748A
`
`PX-108
`
`112
`
`Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Exhibit 748
`
`Exhibit 305
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 305
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 304
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 329
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 71
`
`PX-108, PX-305, PX-304, PX-329, and PX-325
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`PAGE
`
`671
`
`863
`
`675
`
`675
`
`676
`
`677
`
`677
`
`677
`
`678
`
`678
`
`678
`
`679
`
`679
`
`682
`
`682
`
`683
`
`683
`
`684
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`MS 1118 - Page 3
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 4 of 229 PageID #: 40751
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`663
`
`684
`
`685
`
`687
`
`689
`
`694
`
`694
`
`695
`
`703
`
`703
`
`705
`
`705
`
`715
`
`716
`
`716
`
`722
`
`731
`
`731
`
`735
`
`735
`
`736
`
`737
`
`740
`
`741
`
`741
`
`748
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 89
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 161
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 625
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 304
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 759
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 759
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 759
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 760
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 760
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 4
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 5 of 229 PageID #: 40752
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`664
`
`748
`
`751
`
`751
`
`754
`
`759
`
`760
`
`760
`
`762
`
`762
`
`769
`
`773
`
`773
`
`774
`
`777
`
`782
`
`789
`
`808
`
`813
`
`813
`
`816
`
`816
`
`816
`
`817
`
`821
`
`833
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 304
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 767
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 767
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 1
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 89
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 89
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108
`
`Exhibit 771
`
`771A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 771A
`
`Exhibit 771A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Exhibit 187
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 5
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 6 of 229 PageID #: 40753
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`771
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 771
`
`665
`
`835
`
`835
`
`836
`
`836
`
`837
`
`837
`
`838
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 6
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 7 of 229 PageID #: 40754
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`(REPORTER'S NOTES PERSONAL AUDIO V. APPLE,
`
`666
`
`JURY TRIAL, VOLUME 3, 1:00 P.M., MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2011,
`
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS, HON. RON CLARK PRESIDING.)
`
`(OPEN COURT, ALL PARTIES PRESENT, JURY NOT
`
`PRESENT.)
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Let's go ahead, then, and -- I
`
`hope everybody had a good weekend.
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Judge, can I just mention
`
`there are a couple demonstratives in my set that
`
`Mr. Stephens advised me he still has an objection to?
`
`I
`
`don't know if the court's rulings on Friday cover those
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`or not.
`
`I won't get to those until later this afternoon;
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`so, they will not come up in the first hour of testimony.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Okay.
`
`You're talking about
`
`Demonstratives 1059 and 1060?
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`And I guess 1062?
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`That's correct, your Honor.
`
`19
`
`1059, 1060, 1062 --
`
`20
`
`21
`
`THE COURT:
`
`And the concern with 1059 is?
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`They improperly characterize
`
`22
`
`claim limitations by using an abbreviated word or two to
`
`23
`
`represent an entire limitation.
`
`If they wanted to say,
`
`24
`
`you know, "limitation 1B" or something like that, we
`
`25
`
`don't have a problem with the rest of it.
`
`It's just if
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 7
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 8 of 229 PageID #: 40755
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`667
`
`you say, for example, infrared is a shorthand for the
`
`structure that corresponds to the means for language,
`
`that's going to be misleading.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Might possibly make it easier for
`
`the jury to understand if you had the 1B.
`
`I'm going to
`
`overrule as far as the shorthand because this is a
`
`demonstrative.
`
`But Mr. Stephens is correct it might be a
`
`little easier if you put the claim number or sub-number
`
`next to the shorthand so people would know, yeah, that's
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`the 1B thing.
`
`We've got a shorthand here for them.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`That's an excellent
`
`suggestion, your Honor.
`
`I'll try to write that in.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`I will sustain in that it would be
`
`more clear than it was.
`
`Since it's a chart like this and
`
`a demonstrative, I'm not going to require them to try to
`
`put the entire claim term there.
`
`Okay.
`
`What about -- is that the same for 1060
`
`18
`
`then?
`
`19
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`Yeah.
`
`It was the same
`
`20
`
`objection for all of those, your Honor.
`
`21
`
`THE COURT:
`
`All right.
`
`Well, the ruling will
`
`22
`
`be the same on all of them.
`
`23
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`There were a couple of other
`
`24
`
`issues.
`
`I don't know if your Honor was --
`
`25
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Okay.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 8
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 9 of 229 PageID #: 40756
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`So, there are some exhibits
`
`668
`
`that refer to iTunes and the iTunes Web site --
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`-- they attempt to use, and we
`
`think it's inappropriate for Dr. Almeroth to testify
`
`about iTunes and iTunes Web site while he's talking about
`
`infringement.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`All right.
`
`And as stated on my
`
`ruling on the motion in limine, it will stand on that.
`
`MR. STEPHENS:
`
`Okay.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Same basis.
`
`Go ahead and bring in the jury.
`
`(The jury enters the courtroom, 1:00 p.m.)
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Good afternoon, ladies and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`gentlemen.
`
`Welcome back.
`
`Last night, about 7:00, we
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`were over at a friend's house, my wife and I; and she
`
`suddenly collapsed, passed out.
`
`We thought at first it
`
`might be a heart attack or stroke.
`
`We took her down to
`
`19
`
`the emergency room.
`
`They did a bunch of tests.
`
`They now
`
`20
`
`think it was probably some kind of atypical migraine
`
`21
`
`attack.
`
`She's had migraines in the past but never
`
`22
`
`anything like this.
`
`All of the tests came back not being
`
`23
`
`heart attack or stroke.
`
`I apologize for the delay.
`
`I
`
`24
`
`was used to hurricanes causing delays, which is why we
`
`25
`
`wanted your phone number.
`
`Hopefully you all got your
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 9
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 10 of 229 PageID #: 40757
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`669
`
`calls so you didn't have to come down here this morning.
`
`Also, fortunately we had enough time built
`
`into the schedule that if we keep moving right along, I
`
`still think the evidence will be wrapped up -- it will be
`
`a little later in the day but on the same as we talked
`
`about before.
`
`Let me mention two things.
`
`We're going into
`
`this infringement analysis.
`
`Remember that in the end
`
`you're going to be looking at the claims that you're
`
`given -- and I'll give those to you in the
`
`instructions -- and you will compare those against the
`
`accused products, in this case these various versions of
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`the iPod.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`Now, you're going to hear evidence about other
`
`things, for example, iTunes and some of the other things
`
`will be talked about because they're related to it; but
`
`those aren't related products.
`
`So, that's not part of
`
`18
`
`the infringement.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`And you're also going to see some charts
`
`showing some shorthand in the chart of what the claim is,
`
`for example, like claim 1B -- or 1B of a claim.
`
`Keep in
`
`22
`
`mind that you won't be looking at the shorthand; you'll
`
`23
`
`be looking at the claim language itself to see whether
`
`24
`
`that's contained in the iPod you're looking at, for
`
`25
`
`example.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 10
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 11 of 229 PageID #: 40758
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`But on the other hand, if you had to read out
`
`670
`
`all of this language every single time someone mentioned
`
`it, this would go on forever.
`
`The other thing is you've heard and you'll
`
`probably continue to hear that, for example, the people
`
`at Personal Audio had a lot of different patents.
`
`The
`
`people at Apple have a lot of different patents.
`
`Whether
`
`or not somebody has a patent in the past doesn't make
`
`this patent or these two patents or the claims in these
`
`two patents good or bad.
`
`Apple can have a patented
`
`product if other elements are patented and it can still
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`infringe.
`
`Mr. Logan can have patents and they were good
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`patents and you could find that these particular patents
`
`or a claim -- any one or all of the claims were invalid.
`
`So, don't get too carried away about the idea that people
`
`have patents in the past or people have patents now.
`
`Now, there is going to be some argument about
`
`the fact that if something is patented it can't be what's
`
`19
`
`called "equivalent."
`
`And they'll get into that later.
`
`20
`
`But don't focus in on, "Oh, gee, they're patented" or "He
`
`21
`
`has patents" or count up "Well, this expert has 32
`
`22
`
`patents and that expert only has 28 patents."
`
`That's not
`
`23
`
`how this goes.
`
`You're looking at the claim language.
`
`24
`
`You compare that with the accused products.
`
`And when
`
`25
`
`they get to what's called "invalidity," when Apple is
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 11
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 12 of 229 PageID #: 40759
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`saying the patent is not valid, you're going to be
`
`looking at the claim language and you're going to see if
`
`it was not new or if it was obvious or if it didn't meet
`
`671
`
`a written description.
`
`I'll give you some clear instructions on that.
`
`I'm just giving you a little warning about don't get
`
`caught up in what the lawyers and judges use as shorthand
`
`or an easy way, well, let's just count up how many
`
`patents there are on each side and they win.
`
`That's not
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`how it works.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`Go ahead, counsel.
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Thank you, your Honor.
`
`CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION OF
`
`KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`BY MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Q.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, as we left off on Friday and as the
`
`judge was just instructing, your job is to analyze the
`
`iPods sitting in front of you like the claims that are on
`
`this Demonstrative Exhibit 1011.
`
`And is that what you
`
`20
`
`did?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`22
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Now, Dr. Almeroth, when you looked to see if those
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`iPods had everything listed in this claim, for example,
`
`did you notice that they have other things as well that
`
`aren't on this list?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 12
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 13 of 229 PageID #: 40760
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`672
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, I did.
`
`For example?
`
`The iPods have some additional functions, a clock
`
`and a calendar, notes that you can take and contacts you
`
`can have.
`
`There are even some games on some of the
`
`iPods.
`
`So, there are other things on the iPod that
`
`aren't related to this claim.
`
`Q.
`
`And how does it factor into your analysis of
`
`infringement that iPods have some other things that are
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`not in this claim?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`It doesn't factor into my analysis.
`
`My job was to
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`find these limitations in the iPod.
`
`If there was other
`
`things, that doesn't make a difference with respect to
`
`matching up these claims and these limitations with
`
`15
`
`what's in the device.
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`So, Dr. Almeroth, if one iPod could store ten
`
`17
`
`18
`
`songs or a hundred songs or a thousand songs, does that
`
`make a difference to your infringement analysis?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`No.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`Why is that?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`Because a requirement to store a certain number of
`
`22
`
`songs is not listed up there on the board and is not part
`
`23
`
`of the judge's construction.
`
`That's not a test for
`
`24
`
`whether or not this device infringes or not.
`
`25
`
`What color the device is, what size it is,
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 13
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 14 of 229 PageID #: 40761
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`those are not things with respect to claim 1 that have to
`
`be evaluated and have to be present to infringe this
`
`claim.
`
`It really is just those specific things on the
`
`673
`
`board.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`And does it have to be able to store some songs?
`
`Yes.
`
`There will be limitations.
`
`We've talked
`
`about that in the context of the patent.
`
`But there are
`
`the things on the board -- it does have to store songs,
`
`yes.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`So, is it the number of songs that's not required?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`12
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And what if an iPod can download songs
`
`13
`
`really, really fast?
`
`How does that factor into your
`
`14
`
`analysis?
`
`15
`
`A.
`
`The fact that it's fast or really fast or
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`superfast or kind of slow, those aspects don't matter
`
`when it comes to determining infringement.
`
`It just has
`
`to be able to -- for some of the claims to be able to
`
`download and transfer those songs onto the device.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`And how about -- there was some testimony about
`
`21
`
`this wheel or scroll -- Clickwheel on the iPods.
`
`How
`
`22
`
`does that factor into your analysis?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`The same way.
`
`There has to be -- for example, on
`
`24
`
`the board with 1C, there has to be a means for accepting
`
`25
`
`control commands.
`
`The court has identified a couple of
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 14
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 15 of 229 PageID #: 40762
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`674
`
`ways that you can do that, but whether it's a Clickwheel
`
`or some other kind of method doesn't matter.
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`There was some testimony during
`
`Mr. Call's examination about bells and whistles.
`
`Were
`
`you present for that?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Does this have anything to do with bells and
`
`whistles?
`
`A.
`
`It's related to bells and whistles.
`
`The patent
`
`describes a number of different inventions, and it
`
`describes some extra features that can be considered as
`
`part of other claims.
`
`But when it comes to this claim,
`
`this claim will be the boundary for defining what
`
`infringement is and it's really about this claim, these
`
`limitations and then these devices.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, I'd like to turn now to
`
`17
`
`how you did your analysis.
`
`And that includes what types
`
`18
`
`19
`
`of information you had available to examine and some of
`
`the things that you studied to try to figure out if the
`
`20
`
`iPods have the limitations in the claim.
`
`All right?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`22
`
`Q.
`
`Let's start by asking:
`
`Did you prepare an index
`
`23
`
`showing some of the technical documents that you looked
`
`24
`
`at?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 15
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 16 of 229 PageID #: 40763
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`Q.
`
`And just very generally, where did you get these
`
`675
`
`technical documents?
`
`A.
`
`These technical documents were produced by Apple.
`
`As part of this case they have to prove documents that
`
`are relevant; and, so, many of these documents on this
`
`list came from Apple directly.
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, I'm now showing you
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 748A.
`
`What is this?
`
`A.
`
`This is a list of that summary of technical
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`documents.
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`And who prepared this?
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`I did.
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`This document has a title.
`
`It's a little hard to
`
`14
`
`read.
`
`Can you explain what the title is?
`
`15
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`There are a number of pages to this
`
`16
`
`document, and on each page there is documents provided
`
`17
`
`for each of the 13 devices.
`
`There are some groupings as
`
`18
`
`we've discussed before.
`
`But all of the documents broken
`
`19
`
`down by the generations are on this and subsequent pages.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`So, page 1 is the classic Generation 1; and, for
`
`21
`
`example, page 2 is?
`
`22
`
`A.
`
`Classic Generation 2.
`
`The next one, classic
`
`23
`
`Generation 3, then 4, then 5, et cetera.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And within Exhibit 748, do you have a list
`
`25
`
`of technical documents that describe each of the iPods
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 16
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 17 of 229 PageID #: 40764
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`676
`
`that you analyzed?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`All right.
`
`Let's walk a little bit through what
`
`some of those documents are.
`
`We'll use the classic 3 as
`
`an example.
`
`And we'll get into some of these documents
`
`in detail as we go.
`
`Right now I'd just like you to
`
`introduce them.
`
`Let me ask you, first of all, about the
`
`physical devices.
`
`Did you also look at all the physical
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`devices?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Those are up here on the railing, and
`
`12
`
`then I can also demonstrate some of them later.
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`And I'm showing you now Exhibit 744.
`
`Is this an
`
`14
`
`index you prepared of the iPods that you examined by
`
`15
`
`number?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, it is.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`And there are some numbers along the column there,
`
`18
`
`like PX-50 and PX-186.
`
`Can you explain what that is?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Those are the exhibit numbers.
`
`And I think
`
`20
`
`there is a typo in there.
`
`The first column should be DX.
`
`21
`
`Those represent these 13 devices, and they all became a
`
`22
`
`defendant's exhibit.
`
`So, you have -- actually, no, I'm
`
`23
`
`sorry.
`
`Right.
`
`So, that's correct.
`
`24
`
`So, for some of these I had access to multiple
`
`25
`
`devices.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 17
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 18 of 229 PageID #: 40765
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`So, for example, do you have one of the
`
`devices that's on this list right there in front of you?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`For example, the iPod classic third
`
`generation, this is one (indicating); and on the back
`
`677
`
`it's PX-187.
`
`Q.
`
`And, so, does this list help you figure out which
`
`of the iPods you looked at and what trial exhibit number
`
`they are?
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Let's look at the documents now.
`
`And
`
`11
`
`I'm showing you again Exhibit 748A, page 3 for the
`
`12
`
`classic 3.
`
`Does this use exhibit numbers the same way?
`
`13
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it does.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And what is listed next to each of the
`
`15
`
`exhibit numbers?
`
`For example, PX-108 says it's the iPod
`
`16
`
`classic third generation user guide.
`
`What are you
`
`17
`
`indicating there?
`
`18
`
`A.
`
`That's the title of the document.
`
`So, the first
`
`19
`
`one on the list, the 108, is the user guide that comes
`
`20
`
`with this classic 3.
`
`21
`
`Q.
`
`And did you have user guides like this for all of
`
`22
`
`the devices that you looked at?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`So, for example, if we look at the previous page
`
`25
`
`of Exhibit 748, page 2, this is for which device?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 18
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 19 of 229 PageID #: 40766
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`678
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`This is for the classic Generation 2.
`
`And did you list a user guide for this one?
`
`No.
`
`I didn't for this one because it's basically
`
`the same as a classic Generation 1.
`
`Q.
`
`And if we look at the classic Generation 1, the
`
`first page of Exhibit 748, did you list a user guide
`
`here?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`And is that the same user guide as for the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`classic 3?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`It's similar, but there are separate documents
`
`12
`
`because they apply to the different devices.
`
`So, I
`
`13
`
`listed both of them.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`Just to make that clear, the user guide for
`
`15
`
`classic 1 is what exhibit number?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`112.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`112.
`
`And if we go to the classic 3, the user
`
`18
`
`guide is what exhibit number?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`Exhibit 108.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Let's look at that user guide,
`
`21
`
`Exhibit 108.
`
`I'm now showing you the first page of
`
`22
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 108.
`
`Can you explain what this is?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`This is the user guide -- it's a little hard to
`
`24
`
`show up.
`
`Thank you for blowing it up.
`
`25
`
`It's the user's guide.
`
`It comes with a
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 19
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 20 of 229 PageID #: 40767
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`device.
`
`It comes with a little booklet, and it has a
`
`bunch of pages that relate to teaching a user how to use
`
`679
`
`an iPod.
`
`Q.
`
`Is this information that Apple provides to the
`
`public somehow?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it does.
`
`How do they do that?
`
`In the case of this user guide, it was packaged
`
`with the iPod.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`What kind of information is contained in the user
`
`11
`
`guide?
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`It tells you, for example, getting started, what
`
`13
`
`14
`
`you need to connect the communication port on this device
`
`to receive songs and playlists.
`
`It tells you about the
`
`15
`
`buttons.
`
`It tells you about charging the device,
`
`16
`
`17
`
`troubleshooting, all the things that a user has to know
`
`to take advantage of the functions of this device.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Now turning back to Exhibit 748, the
`
`19
`
`20
`
`index for the classic 3, the next line talks about an
`
`iPod classic 3 online technical specification, which is
`
`21
`
`Exhibit 305.
`
`22
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`23
`
`Q.
`
`I'm going to show you that.
`
`Can you explain what
`
`24
`
`kind of information is contained in a technical
`
`25
`
`specification?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 20
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 21 of 229 PageID #: 40768
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`680
`
`A.
`
`This has specifications, details about some of the
`
`components in the device, from the kinds of storage it
`
`has to the kinds of power that it has; and it's about
`
`three pages long and lists some of the details that --
`
`the more technical aspects of the device.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Now, this says "N 3" up here.
`
`What does that mean?
`
`That's the third generation of the iPod classic.
`
`Is this a public document that Apple provides to
`
`the public?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`A.
`
`No.
`
`This is available internal only to Apple.
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`And is this a confidential document?
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it is.
`
`It says so in the lower left corner,
`
`13
`
`"confidential."
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`That's down here (indicating).
`
`15
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`And we'll get into this in a little bit more
`
`17
`
`detail; but just as a quick tour, you mentioned this
`
`18
`
`describes storage?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`That's right.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`Is that something that will be important to your
`
`21
`
`analysis?
`
`22
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it will.
`
`23
`
`Q.
`
`And what under the "storage" line are the kinds of
`
`24
`
`things we'll be looking at?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`It talks about the kind of storage, the fact that
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 21
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 22 of 229 PageID #: 40769
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`681
`
`it has RAM.
`
`It talks about the type of persistent mass
`
`storage it has here.
`
`In this case it's a hard disk
`
`drive.
`
`The first line is about the capacity.
`
`It
`
`talks about the size in gigabytes, which roughly
`
`translates to a number of songs that the device can
`
`store.
`
`Q.
`
`And is this indication of connectivity something
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`we'll be talking about?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`It also talks about the kind of
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`communication port that's on the bottom of this device
`
`and the kind of protocol that you can use to communicate
`
`and receive information.
`
`15
`
`Q.
`
`Did you have technical specifications like this
`
`16
`
`for all 13 of the iPods that you examined?
`
`17
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`Notice this document also has a reference to a
`
`19
`
`headphone port.
`
`Is that something that's also going to
`
`20
`
`be important to your analysis?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`A document like this and others on the list
`
`22
`
`help build a picture for the kinds of things that I need
`
`23
`
`to reach a conclusion about whether it infringes or not.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Returning now to your index, just
`
`25
`
`under the document we just looked at, the technical
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 22
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 23 of 229 PageID #: 40770
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`specification that's Plaintiff's Exhibit 305, there is a
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 304, a product specification?
`
`682
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`Let's look at that.
`
`It looks very similar.
`
`What
`
`is this?
`
`A.
`
`It does.
`
`It's a product specification.
`
`This one
`
`is a little bit longer.
`
`It's about four pages.
`
`But much
`
`of the information is the same, again more specific
`
`details -- clearly more specific details than what are in
`
`a user guide about kinds of components and what their
`
`capabilities are on the device.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`Q.
`
`This indicates that there are some things in the
`
`13
`
`box.
`
`Is that something you considered?
`
`14
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it is.
`
`15
`
`Q.
`
`And what does that mean?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`Some of those things that are in the box -- for
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`example, the earbuds, those are headphones.
`
`And it also
`
`talks about the kind of cables that there are that will
`
`attach to the bottom of this device.
`
`That's all
`
`20
`
`information that's relevant in my opinion.
`
`21
`
`Q.
`
`And did you find that all of the iPods come with
`
`22
`
`earbuds and with a cable for connecting?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`Let's go now back to your index.
`
`The next kind of
`
`25
`
`document on the list is a hardware specification, and
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 23
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 24 of 229 PageID #: 40771
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`there are two lines for the hardware specification.
`
`They're Plaintiff's Exhibit 329 and Plaintiff's
`
`Exhibit 71.
`
`What kind of information is in those?
`
`I'll
`
`683
`
`pull up 329.
`
`A.
`
`Those are documents that provide even more
`
`lower-layer detail about the device.
`
`They go into some
`
`of the specific components that are in the device.
`
`This first one is about the Q14 Buster.
`
`Q14 -- each of the devices has an internal code name for
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`it.
`
`In the case of the classic 3, it's Q14.
`
`They
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`usually use a letter and then a two-digit number.
`
`So,
`
`each of these 13 devices has one of these code names.
`
`And then this describes then the hardware
`
`14
`
`specification.
`
`If you advance forward a couple of pages,
`
`15
`
`for example, there will be details on the types of
`
`16
`
`components.
`
`Here is a table, for example, summarizing
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`some of the hardware components that are in this device.
`
`When you blow it up -- so, for example, the
`
`hard drive is from a company called "Toshiba."
`
`Now we're
`
`starting to look at additional details about the device.
`
`It talks about the battery, and that's from a company
`
`22
`
`called "LG."
`
`Then there's also NEC.
`
`And then there's
`
`23
`
`also -- for example, you get to the level of detail where
`
`24
`
`you have this battery pack insulating tape, and I'm not
`
`25
`
`even going to try and pronounce the company that that's
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 24
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 25 of 229 PageID #: 40772
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`684
`
`from.
`
`But this hardware guide will start to lay out
`
`some of the specific details of the things that are in
`
`this device.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Counsel, just to remind you, when
`
`you're going through the index, you're saying that it's
`
`plaintiff's exhibit.
`
`When you're talking about what's on
`
`the screen, you're just using a number.
`
`But just for
`
`record purposes, so far everything you've shown up on the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`screen so far this afternoon has been a plaintiff's
`
`11
`
`exhibit?
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Okay.
`
`If you'll remember -- and
`
`I'll try to remind you -- when you're talking about the
`
`ones that are up, as you show the exhibit, plaintiff's or
`
`16
`
`defendant's exhibits.
`
`We've got hundreds of each.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`I apologize for that; and just
`
`for the record, I'll read them right now.
`
`The ones we've
`
`discussed so far are PX-108, PX-305, PX-304, PX-329, and
`
`20
`
`PX-325.
`
`21
`
`BY MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`22
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, returning to your index,
`
`23
`
`underneath the hardware specification there is
`
`24
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 325, a bill of materials report.
`
`25
`
`What is a bill of materials report?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1118 - Page 25
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 536 Filed 09/13/11 Page 26 of 229 PageID #: 40773
`Jury Trial, Volume 3
`
`685
`
`A.
`
`The hardware specification guides were one level
`
`of detail, and now we're going even further.
`
`This is
`
`about a 34-page document that lists, in very careful
`
`detail, all of the specific parts that are in there, down
`
`to some of the smallest components in the device.
`
`This kind of document is useful because it
`
`tells you manufacturer, part number, component
`
`information, size, shape, a lot of different details
`
`about everything that's in one of these devices.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`And did you have bills of materials reports for
`
`11
`
`all of the devices you examined?
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, I did.
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`Did you study them to find information in them to
`
`14
`
`help inform you as to whether those devices have parts
`
`15
`
`that correspond to the claim?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`Absolutely.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, the next type of
`
`18
`
`document in your guide is a chip schematic, Plaintiff's
`
`19
`
`Exhibit 89.
`
`What is a chip schematic?
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`I don't think we're going to go into lower than a
`
`21
`
`chip schematic.
`
`That has all of the specific chips, how
`
`22
`
`they are laid out on the boards, how those things a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket