throbber
MS 1117
`MS 1117
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 373 PageID #: 40977
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`889
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`LUFKIN DIVISION
`
`DOCKET 9:09CV111
`
`JUNE 28, 2011
`
`8:28 A.M.
`
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`||||| ||
`
`PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC
`
`VS.
`
`APPLE, INC., ET AL
`
`--------------------------------------------------------
`
`VOLUME 4 OF __, PAGES 889 THROUGH 1261
`
`REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL
`
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE RON CLARK
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
`
`--------------------------------------------------------
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
`
`RONALD J. SCHUTZ
`JACOB M. HOLDREITH
`CYRUS A. MORTON
`ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI - MN
`800 LASALLE AVENUE
`SUITE 2800
`MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
`
`55402
`
`ANNIE HUANG
`ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI - NY
`601 LEXINGTON AVENUE
`SUITE 3400
`NEW YORK, NEW YORK
`
`10022
`
`LAWRENCE LOUIS GERMER
`GERMER GERTZ
`550 FANNIN
`SUITE 400
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`77701
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 373 PageID #: 40978
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`FOR THE DEFENDANTS:
`
`890
`
`RUFFIN B. CORDELL
`FISH & RICHARDSON - WASHINGTON DC
`1425 K STREET NW
`SUITE 1100
`WASHINGTON, DC
`
`20005
`
`GARLAND T. STEPHENS
`BENJAMIN C. ELACQUA
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`1221 MCKINNEY
`28TH FLOOR
`HOUSTON, TEXAS
`
`77010
`
`KELLY C. HUNSAKER
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`500 ARGUELLO STREET
`SUITE 500
`REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA
`
`94063
`
`JUSTIN BARNES
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`12390 EL CAMINO REAL
`SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
`
`92130
`
`J. THAD HEARTFIELD
`THE HEARTFIELD LAW FIRM
`2195 DOWLEN ROAD
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`
`77706
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`CHRISTINA L. BICKHAM, CRR, RMR
`FEDERAL OFFICIAL REPORTER
`300 WILLOW, SUITE 221
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS
`77701
`
`PROCEEDINGS REPORTED USING COMPUTERIZED STENOTYPE;
`TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED VIA COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSCRIPTION.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`MS 1117 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 3 of 373 PageID #: 40979
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`INDEX
`
`891
`
`CONTINUED DIRECT EXAM OF KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`CROSS-EXAMINATION OF KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`DIRECT EXAMINATION OF ANTHONY M. FADELL
`
`CROSS-EXAMINATION OF ANTHONY M. FADELL
`
`PAGE
`
`897
`
`1026
`
`1057
`
`1100
`
`CONTINUED CROSS-EXAM OF KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`1168
`
`CONCORDANCE INDEX
`
`1220
`
`INDEX OF EXHIBITS
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 287
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 98
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 98
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 715
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 714
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`905
`
`906
`
`907
`
`914
`
`914
`
`914
`
`917
`
`917
`
`917
`
`917
`
`917
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`MS 1117 - Page 3
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 4 of 373 PageID #: 40980
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`892
`
`919
`
`924
`
`926
`
`927
`
`953
`
`953
`
`960
`
`960
`
`963
`
`964
`
`975
`
`975
`
`979
`
`979
`
`984
`
`985
`
`985
`
`985
`
`987
`
`987
`
`988
`
`988
`
`989
`
`992
`
`992
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 714
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 628A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 628A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 628A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 113
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 377
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`713, and 714 and 715
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 715
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 714
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 713
`
`712, 713, 714, and 715
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 4
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 5 of 373 PageID #: 40981
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`893
`
`993
`
`999
`
`1000
`
`1001
`
`1001
`
`1003
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1012
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1015
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1017
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 161
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 715
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 772A through 781A
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 104
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 298
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 321
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 95
`
`Exhibit 95
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 102
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 294
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 317
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 92
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 113
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 310
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 322
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 96
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 105
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 311
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 323
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 97
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 106
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 292
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 5
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 6 of 373 PageID #: 40982
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`894
`
`1018
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1025
`
`1028
`
`1031
`
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1061
`
`1062
`
`1062
`
`1069
`
`1076
`
`1078
`
`1080
`
`1090
`
`1090
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 331
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 98
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 103
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 278
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 290
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 314
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 99
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 107
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 291
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 85
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 100
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 100
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 1
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 1
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 784
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 784
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 784
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 784
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 784
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 753
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 754
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 755
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`36
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 36
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 6
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 7 of 373 PageID #: 40983
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`895
`
`1090
`
`1096
`
`1138
`
`1140
`
`1142
`
`1147
`
`901
`
`952
`
`952
`
`952
`
`953
`
`1044
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1068
`
`1112
`
`1116
`
`1121
`
`1123
`
`1125
`
`1126
`
`1127
`
`1128
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 36
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 377
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Plaintiff's Exhibit 745
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 104
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 102
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 108
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 109
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 109
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 271
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 271
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 57
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 271
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 303
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 7
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 8 of 373 PageID #: 40984
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 303
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 305
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 303
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 261
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 261
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 261
`
`Defendant's Exhibit 261
`
`896
`
`1128
`
`1128
`
`1128
`
`1129
`
`1129
`
`1149
`
`1153
`
`1153
`
`1154
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 8
`
`

`
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 9 of 373 PageID #: 40985
`
`(REPORTER'S NOTES PERSONAL AUDIO V. APPLE,
`
`897
`
`JURY TRIAL, VOLUME 4, 8:28 A.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2011,
`
`BEAUMONT, TEXAS, HON. RON CLARK PRESIDING.)
`
`(OPEN COURT, ALL PARTIES PRESENT, JURY
`
`PRESENT.)
`
`gentlemen.
`
`THE COURT:
`
`Welcome back, ladies and
`
`Counsel, go ahead.
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Thank you, your Honor.
`
`CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION OF
`
`KEVIN C. ALMEROTH
`
`CALLED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF
`
`BY MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Good morning, Dr. Almeroth.
`
`Good morning.
`
`When we left off yesterday, we were looking at
`
`this Demonstrative Number 1058 on the iPod groups.
`
`I'd
`
`like to ask you now:
`
`For each of the seven groups that
`
`we haven't talked about yet, 2 through 8 and the classic
`
`1 and 2 as well, did you also analyze a user guide and
`
`technical specifications and a chip schematic and a bill
`
`of materials?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`And for purposes of the information that you were
`
`25
`
`relying on to determine what's in the iPods, did those
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 9
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 10 of 373 PageID #: 40986
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`898
`
`kinds of documents contain the same information in the
`
`user guides and chip schematics and bills of materials
`
`and technical specifications that you found in the
`
`documents for the classic 3?
`
`A.
`
`They contained very similar information.
`
`Some of
`
`it was identical.
`
`Much of it was overlapping.
`
`So, it
`
`really became a process of what I've talked about for
`
`classic 3, finding similar kinds of information in the
`
`other materials.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`Are you prepared, Dr. Almeroth, to explain where
`
`11
`
`12
`
`you found differences that mattered to your infringement
`
`analysis in these other seven groups?
`
`13
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, I am.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`And have you prepared a chart to help illustrate
`
`15
`
`that testimony?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`I have.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, I'm now showing you the
`
`18
`
`Demonstrative Exhibit 1059.
`
`Can you explain what this
`
`19
`
`is, please?
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`This is a chart that I prepared.
`
`It has the
`
`21
`
`groups across the top, 1 through 8.
`
`And then down the
`
`22
`
`rows are the different elements as they relate to
`
`23
`
`claim 1.
`
`What that means is inside of the table what
`
`24
`
`I've identified is differences between the devices and
`
`25
`
`between the groups; and then I've also recognized that
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 10
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 11 of 373 PageID #: 40987
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`899
`
`for other parts, they are also substantially the same.
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`So, just to orient us, across the top
`
`where it says "Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8," is that the
`
`same groups we've been talking about?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, sir, they are.
`
`And down the column that says "Element," are these
`
`related to the patent claims in '076 claim 1 somehow?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes, they are.
`
`Explain that, please.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`A.
`
`There is a little bit of a shorthand that I've
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`used in the words themselves, but I've also included a
`
`key that references to the number and the letter that
`
`corresponds to the board on the left so that I can
`
`explain some of those similarities and differences across
`
`15
`
`the limitations.
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`So, for example, the first row has the label
`
`17
`
`"means for accepting commands 1C" here (indicating).
`
`18
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`19
`
`Q.
`
`How is that related to the '076 claim 1?
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`That is element 1C from claim 1 of the
`
`21
`
`'076 patent.
`
`22
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Now, why is there a row across next to
`
`23
`
`"means for accepting commands 1C"?
`
`What's the
`
`24
`
`significance of that?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`The goal of this chart is to be able to take any
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 11
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 12 of 373 PageID #: 40988
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`900
`
`column and any row and match it up.
`
`And what I've tried
`
`to do then inside the body of the table is where there
`
`were similarities across the devices, those rows -- or
`
`those cells would be grouped together.
`
`And where there
`
`were differences that I had to analyze with respect to my
`
`opinion, then there would be a dividing line.
`
`So, for example, in the "means for accepting,"
`
`the classic 3 that we've talked about had the buttons
`
`across the top; but all of the other devices in the
`
`groups had the buttons that were inside of the
`
`Clickwheel, that you could just press the Clickwheel and
`
`that would correspond to the button.
`
`So, that was a
`
`difference that I had noted and want to discuss now.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Just as a reminder, I'll put the
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`definition for the structure for that element 1C, means
`
`for accepting, up on the big screen.
`
`That was the one
`
`where you were looking for a structure that is equivalent
`
`18
`
`to a keyboard?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`And I think you've already explained
`
`21
`
`it in part.
`
`Could you just briefly explain, did you find
`
`22
`
`structure that is identical or equivalent to the keyboard
`
`23
`
`structure in all of the seven other groups of iPods that
`
`24
`
`you analyzed?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`As I said, the keys that are part of
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 12
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 13 of 373 PageID #: 40989
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`901
`
`this board of keys here are separate from the Clickwheel.
`
`But then in the later versions -- and I'll do the mini 2
`
`because it's still a little bit bigger.
`
`You have --
`
`Q.
`
`Doctor -- I'm sorry -- could you just tell us the
`
`exhibit number for the iPod you're holding in your hand?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`This is Defendant's Exhibit 104.
`
`Thank you.
`
`This device has the buttons that are part of the
`
`Clickwheel.
`
`You can still move your finger around in a
`
`circular fashion to navigate up and down lists, but the
`
`buttons themselves are part of the Clickwheel.
`
`So, in
`
`order to, for example, skip, you just have to press that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`button.
`
`And I don't know if they'll be able to see
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`these, but you can feel when you press it that there is a
`
`click just like with a key on a keyboard.
`
`And that's the same for all of the devices,
`
`all of the way up into the nano 5, which is a little bit
`
`harder to see but it has the same kind of configuration.
`
`And what I'm showing in this
`
`Demonstrative 1059 is that in the classic 3, the buttons
`
`were separate from the Clickwheel; and then afterwards
`
`22
`
`they were all integrated into the Clickwheel.
`
`23
`
`Q.
`
`And are the buttons that are on the Clickwheel
`
`24
`
`there -- are those the same buttons that were in a row
`
`25
`
`across the top on the classic 3?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 13
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 14 of 373 PageID #: 40990
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`There are the four buttons, the
`
`back command, the menu, the play/pause, and then the skip
`
`902
`
`command.
`
`Q.
`
`And they do the same thing as the four buttons on
`
`the classic 3?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`
`That's correct.
`
`All right.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, did you find element 1C
`
`of the '076 patent, claim 1, in all seven groups that you
`
`analyzed other than the classic 3?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`I'd like to ask you now about the next
`
`12
`
`13
`
`row on Demonstrative Exhibit 1059 labeled "persistent
`
`storage" with element 1A and 1B.
`
`What is that?
`
`14
`
`A.
`
`This relates to the persistent storage that's
`
`15
`
`16
`
`required for the limitations 1A and 1B.
`
`As we discussed
`
`yesterday with respect to classic 3, 1A requires a means
`
`17
`
`for storing.
`
`1B is the means for receiving and storing.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`With respect to the storing limitations that
`
`are required in the function and then the corresponding
`
`structure, I analyzed all eight groups and all 18 devices
`
`21
`
`with respect to that persistent storage.
`
`And what I've
`
`22
`
`done for this row is there are basically two types of
`
`23
`
`persistent mass storage that are used in these devices.
`
`24
`
`There's the hard disk drive that we used for classic 3.
`
`25
`
`And, in fact, that first column is representative of what
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 14
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 15 of 373 PageID #: 40991
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`we went through in detail yesterday.
`
`903
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`You're speaking about Column 1 here (indicating)?
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Okay.
`
`So, for example, we talked about the hard disk
`
`drive in classic 3.
`
`Classic 4 and classic 5 have a hard
`
`disk drive.
`
`Nanos 1, 2, and 3 have a NAND flash; and I
`
`can talk about that in a little bit more detail.
`
`And
`
`then classic 6 has a hard disk drive, and the nano 4 and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`5 have this NAND flash that they use as persistent mass
`
`11
`
`storage.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`So, that's a difference between the devices;
`
`but it doesn't affect my conclusion.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, let me pause for a moment.
`
`I see
`
`15
`
`16
`
`that Group 6 has a nano 3 and a classic 6 but they have
`
`different persistent storage; is that right?
`
`17
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`And the nano 3 and the classic 6, are they grouped
`
`19
`
`together in the same Group 6?
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Apple had grouped these together
`
`21
`
`to create one group with nano 3 and classic 6.
`
`And
`
`22
`
`what's interesting about that grouping is one of the
`
`23
`
`devices has a hard disk drive and one of the devices has
`
`24
`
`a NAND flash for persistent mass storage.
`
`25
`
`In other words, by grouping these together,
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 15
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 16 of 373 PageID #: 40992
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`Apple didn't draw a distinction between the type of mass
`
`904
`
`storage that was used in the device; and that's
`
`consistent with my opinion as well.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`What is NAND flash?
`
`NAND flash is a kind of chip that you're able to
`
`store programs on.
`
`There is a type of flash memory that
`
`you use in the little USB connector memory devices that
`
`you plug in.
`
`It's persistent because when power leaves
`
`the device, what's stored on that device is still there.
`
`There's advantages to using NAND.
`
`For
`
`example, it doesn't have the spinning hard disk drive.
`
`But what's important for the limitation is that it's
`
`still a persistent mass storage device.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`And for people in your field, is NAND flash a kind
`
`15
`
`of persistent storage?
`
`16
`
`A.
`
`Yes, it is.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`How did you determine that the -- some
`
`18
`
`19
`
`of these other devices in Groups 4, 5, 7, and 8 have NAND
`
`flash for persistent storage for storing songs on a
`
`20
`
`sequencing file?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`I used much of the same methodology, the kinds of
`
`22
`
`documents that I described yesterday with respect to the
`
`23
`
`classic 3.
`
`So, for example, the technical specification,
`
`24
`
`the bill of materials, and then the chip schematics all
`
`25
`
`describe using the NAND flash memory to store songs and
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 16
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 17 of 373 PageID #: 40993
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`playlists.
`
`Q.
`
`I'm showing you now Plaintiff's Exhibit 287.
`
`What
`
`905
`
`is this?
`
`A.
`
`This is part of the technical specification.
`
`This
`
`is one of the documents, and it relates to -- now we're
`
`talking about the nano third generation device.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`And that's what the title says up here?
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Now, what in this document was relevant to the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`persistent storage and the NAND flash?
`
`11
`
`A.
`
`There's two parts I would want to point out to.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`The first is the top part of this table.
`
`And it talks
`
`about storage and capacity and it talks about the
`
`4 gigabytes and also there is a second type of device
`
`that has 8 gigabytes instead of the 4 gigabytes.
`
`And it
`
`talks about using that storage for songs.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`And did you also inspect the iPods and determine
`
`18
`
`whether that storage is used for the sequencing file?
`
`19
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, I did.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`What did you find?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`I found that that same NAND flash memory as the
`
`22
`
`persistent mass storage device is used for both songs and
`
`23
`
`playlists.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`Was there another part of this document you wanted
`
`25
`
`to point out?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 17
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 18 of 373 PageID #: 40994
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`906
`
`A.
`
`Down here (indicating), under "capacity," it
`
`provides a little bit more information.
`
`It mentions
`
`again that the capacity of this flash drive is
`
`4 gigabytes and 8 gigabytes.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`What does that tell you?
`
`That tells you that -- especially these other
`
`lines where it talks about the songs and the format are
`
`related to using that device to store -- the NAND flash
`
`drive to store songs.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`As long as we're on this document, Dr. Almeroth, I
`
`11
`
`12
`
`just wanted to ask you:
`
`There's a reference here -- if I
`
`could just pull it up -- to "included accessories."
`
`What
`
`13
`
`does this tell us?
`
`14
`
`A.
`
`One of the included accessories are the earphones.
`
`15
`
`That was the part that you needed for the speakers, or
`
`16
`
`headphones.
`
`And then it also includes the USB cable as
`
`17
`
`well.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, in addition to the technical
`
`19
`
`specification, how did you determine that that flash
`
`20
`
`storage is NAND flash storage?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`I looked at both the bill of materials and also
`
`22
`
`the chip schematic.
`
`23
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Let's look at the chip schematic.
`
`I'm
`
`24
`
`showing you Plaintiff's Exhibit 98.
`
`What is this?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`This is for N46 -- that's the internal code word
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 18
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 19 of 373 PageID #: 40995
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`907
`
`for the -- I believe it's the nano 3.
`
`And down here
`
`(indicating) it talks about NAND flash, and it has in
`
`parentheses "mass storage."
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`And is that an indication you relied on to
`
`find that the iPod nano's NAND flash is persistent mass
`
`storage?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`It is.
`
`Just as long as we're looking at this document, do
`
`you see the line that says -- line 6 here, "WM audio"?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`What's that a reference to?
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`That's a reference to the audio -- the
`
`13
`
`digital-audio conversion capability that's inside of the
`
`14
`
`nano 3.
`
`It's part of this device.
`
`15
`
`Q.
`
`And line 7 talks about "FireWire power" and "USB
`
`16
`
`RVP."
`
`What's that about?
`
`17
`
`A.
`
`What that's describing is by the time that you get
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`to nano 3, it still has FireWire but the only use of
`
`FireWire at this point is for charging.
`
`All of the data
`
`transfer features are being done through USB; so, the
`
`songs in the playlists come over the USB cable and not
`
`22
`
`FireWire.
`
`23
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Now, you mentioned NAND flash is on
`
`24
`
`page 4.
`
`If we go to page 4 of Plaintiff's Exhibit 98,
`
`25
`
`what does this show?
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 19
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 20 of 373 PageID #: 40996
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`A.
`
`This is the NAND flash, and then there is the
`
`controller.
`
`The controller is the gateway that will read
`
`908
`
`and write data from the NAND flash.
`
`Q.
`
`Now, Dr. Almeroth, having looked at these
`
`documents, did you find that there was similar
`
`information in the technical specifications and the chip
`
`schematics for all eight groups of iPods that you
`
`analyzed?
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`Do all eight groups have a high-speed RAM storage
`
`11
`
`and a persistent mass storage that's either a hard drive
`
`12
`
`or a NAND flash?
`
`13
`
`A.
`
`Yes, they do.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`And did you find, therefore, that elements 1A and
`
`15
`
`1B are met of the '076 claim 1 for all eight groups of
`
`16
`
`iPods?
`
`17
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`All right, Dr. Almeroth.
`
`Now, I asked you about
`
`19
`
`how you found that there is RAM.
`
`Can you point us to
`
`20
`
`that?
`
`21
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`There are additional documents, both -- and
`
`22
`
`I believe in the chip spec and then also in the technical
`
`23
`
`specifications that describe the use of RAM.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Let's go to the next row here, which is
`
`25
`
`"algorithms."
`
`And it says that's relevant to 1D, 1E, and
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 20
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 21 of 373 PageID #: 40997
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`909
`
`1F.
`
`Can you explain that, please?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`The software that we looked at yesterday, 1D
`
`was continuously playing; 1E was the means for
`
`detecting -- I went over that fairly quickly because
`
`Apple has not contested that that limitation is
`
`present -- and then for 1F, that was executing the skip
`
`forward command.
`
`And those were the three parts of this
`
`claim that had algorithm steps.
`
`So, what I have labeled here as the row is the
`
`label of "algorithms"; and what I've pointed out is
`
`across these eight groups, there are really three
`
`different types of software.
`
`The first one was
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`"Player.c."
`
`Most of the functions that we looked at
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`yesterday were in a file called "Player.c."
`
`What happened then after nano 1 was they
`
`started to do some updating and a transition to a new
`
`function or a new file and a new set of functions called
`
`18
`
`"TPodMediaPlayer."
`
`And the ".cpp" refers to an updated
`
`19
`
`version of the C programming language called "C" and then
`
`20
`
`"++."
`
`So, I analyzed that as well.
`
`21
`
`And then for the nano 2, it was slightly
`
`22
`
`different because it was in the process of transitioning.
`
`23
`
`And I looked at the source code for all of the devices to
`
`24
`
`confirm that everything that I talked about yesterday
`
`25
`
`with respect to the limitations 1D, 1E, and 1F were in
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 21
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 22 of 373 PageID #: 40998
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`910
`
`all of that different software.
`
`Q.
`
`So, let's just understand this, Dr. Almeroth.
`
`One
`
`change you just mentioned is that some iPods were using
`
`this Player.c type code, and then did Apple later go to
`
`use some of this TPodMediaPlayer.cpp type code?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`I mentioned that there were 23,000 files
`
`across the 13 devices; and I've really just picked one of
`
`the main file names to represent all of the code.
`
`Many of the files stayed the same that were
`
`relevant to my analysis.
`
`Some changed over time and --
`
`but at the same time, I found all of the algorithms that
`
`I discussed yesterday in the different code.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`And for the devices in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 --
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`Your Honor, may I point
`
`something out on the chart?
`
`THE COURT:
`
`You may.
`
`17
`
`BY MR. HOLDREITH:
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`For 1, 2, 3, and 4 that use this Player.c type
`
`19
`
`code, is it exactly the same for all four of those?
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`It's not exactly the same, but it's very close.
`
`21
`
`One of the ways that you can tell is that the names of
`
`22
`
`the functions are the same.
`
`For example, there would be
`
`23
`
`a PlayerNext function and you can look at the source code
`
`24
`
`and the next file and it's still called "PlayerNext."
`
`25
`
`And then in the next it's called "PlayerNext."
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 22
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 23 of 373 PageID #: 40999
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`The same thing for some of the other functions
`
`911
`
`that were described that -- that I described yesterday.
`
`They have the very similar kind of algorithms.
`
`There's a
`
`couple of different steps as some of the devices included
`
`additional features.
`
`There's additional things that the
`
`software would do.
`
`But by and large and especially with
`
`respect to my analysis for infringement here, those
`
`algorithms were very, very similar.
`
`Q.
`
`And for the iPods in Groups 5, 6, 7, and 8 that
`
`use the hybrid and the TPodMediaPlayer.cpp type code, did
`
`you analyze all of those?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I did.
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`And are those exactly the same?
`
`14
`
`A.
`
`No.
`
`Again there are some small differences, but
`
`15
`
`16
`
`by and large the algorithms that are present in that
`
`source code are very similar across all of those groups.
`
`17
`
`Q.
`
`Did you also look at classic 1 and 2 source code?
`
`18
`
`A.
`
`I did and it used Player.c and it was very similar
`
`19
`
`to Groups 1 through 4.
`
`20
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`Now, Dr. Almeroth, as a reminder, are we
`
`21
`
`talking about the algorithms like on Demonstrative
`
`22
`
`Exhibit 1010 that I have on the screen now?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`The parts that are highlighted that
`
`24
`
`represent the algorithm -- or the algorithms for the
`
`25
`
`commands that are highlighted in this demonstrative.
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 23
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 24 of 373 PageID #: 41000
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`Q.
`
`And is this something that you looked into the
`
`912
`
`source code to find?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Okay.
`
`And when we walked through lines of source
`
`code yesterday, is that what this is related to?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`That's exactly correct.
`
`Now, did you find, Dr. Almeroth, for all eight
`
`groups of iPods that the algorithms that the court
`
`defined as structure for elements 1D, 1E, and 1F of the
`
`'076 patent claim 1 are present either literally or
`
`equivalently in all eight groups of iPods?
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir, I did.
`
`13
`
`Q.
`
`And yesterday did you show an example or examples
`
`14
`
`from the Player.c type code for the classic 3?
`
`15
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`That's correct.
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`And did that include discussion of, for example,
`
`17
`
`the continuously reproducing algorithm in limitation 1F?
`
`18
`
`A.
`
`That's -- yes.
`
`19
`
`Q.
`
`So --
`
`20
`
`A.
`
`Sorry.
`
`Continuously reproducing was 1D.
`
`21
`
`Q.
`
`I'm sorry.
`
`I misspoke.
`
`Thank you, Dr. Almeroth.
`
`22
`
`Can you now, with reference to TPodMediaPlayer
`
`23
`
`type code, explain how you found some of these
`
`24
`
`algorithms?
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`Certainly.
`
`I used a very similar technique.
`
`I
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 24
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 25 of 373 PageID #: 41001
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`went into the code.
`
`Certainly having learned what I
`
`learned from the Player.c, I could look for similar kinds
`
`of statements that would be used as a guide that would
`
`913
`
`show me what was happening.
`
`I also used as a guide, for example, the -- we
`
`talked about the interrogatories that were provided by
`
`Apple yesterday; and that provided information about
`
`where in that source code the functions related to
`
`continuously reproducing, skip, and then the back
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`commands.
`
`11
`
`Q.
`
`Can you actually show us some source code to show
`
`12
`
`us what you found?
`
`13
`
`A.
`
`Yes, I can.
`
`14
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`Where should we start?
`
`15
`
`A.
`
`One of the things that I did -- and remember for
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`continuously reproducing as well as for skip forward --
`
`was after both parts came to this PlayerNext -- and what
`
`PlayerNext had to do was to figure out what the next
`
`playable item was, and it would do that by calling a
`
`20
`
`function.
`
`That was the "while" loop and then the
`
`21
`
`comment.
`
`22
`
`One of the things that I did was to look for
`
`23
`
`that same kind of information in the source code.
`
`What
`
`24
`
`I've got then is for four different versions, starting at
`
`25
`
`the very beginning with the classic 3 going all of the
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 25
`
`

`
`Case 9:09-cv-00111-RC Document 537 Filed 09/13/11 Page 26 of 373 PageID #: 41002
`Jury Trial, Volume 4
`
`way to the nano 5, some information related to that.
`
`So, Mr. Holdreith, if you could put up on the
`
`screen, there is a Plaintiff's Exhibit 712; and that is
`
`914
`
`nano 5 source code.
`
`Q.
`
`I'm now showing you Plaintiff's Exhibit 712.
`
`Is
`
`that what you're referring to?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Yes, sir.
`
`Okay.
`
`If you go to page 31 in that document --
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Q.
`
`Dr. Almeroth, let me ask you a question.
`
`Are we
`
`11
`
`12
`
`going to be comparing different versions of the source
`
`code together on the screen now, or are we going to stick
`
`13
`
`to this one version?
`
`14
`
`A.
`
`Let me just point out some of the features of this
`
`15
`
`one version first.
`
`16
`
`Q.
`
`Okay.
`
`So, that was page 32?
`
`17
`
`A.
`
`Let's start with page 31.
`
`18
`
`Q.
`
`31.
`
`All right -- oops.
`
`I think I gave you 30.
`
`19
`
`I'll go forward one.
`
`20
`
`Okay.
`
`I'm showing you Plaintiff's Exhibit 712
`
`21
`
`at page 31.
`
`Just to be perfectly clear, this is which
`
`22
`
`source code?
`
`23
`
`A.
`
`This is for the nano 5.
`
`24
`
`Q.
`
`All right.
`
`25
`
`A.
`
`And if you pull up -- if you can expand on this
`
`Christina L. Bickham, RMR, CRR
`409/654-2891
`
`MS 1117 - Page 26

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket