`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C. A. No. 13-2058-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2061-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2062-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2063-RGA
`
`))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AT&T SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,
`INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`COMCAST CABLE
`COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 552
`
`C. A. No. 13-2064-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2065-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2066-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2067-RGA
`
`)))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`COX COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DIRECTV LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DISH NETWORK, LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 2
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 553
`
`C. A. No. 13-2068-RGA
`
`C. A. No. 13-2069-RGA
`
`)))))))))))
`
`))))))))))))
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TIME WARNER CABLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL
`PROPERTY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
`INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`Pursuant to Paragraph 10 of the Scheduling Order dated April 21, 2014, Plaintiff Dragon
`
`Intellectual Property LLC and the Defendants in the above captioned cases respectfully submit
`
`this Joint Claim Construction Chart. The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 (the “’444
`
`Patent”). The parties’ respective proposals for the terms in dispute, with citations to the intrinsic
`
`evidence in support of their respective proposed constructions, are set forth in Exhibit A hereto
`
`(“Statement of Disputed Terms”). The parties reserve their rights to amend and/or supplement
`
`the attached Joint Claim Construction Chart with additional intrinsic evidence in their claim
`
`construction briefs.
`
`-1-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 554
`
`BAYARD, P.A.
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`/s/ Stephen B. Brauerman
`Richard D. Kirk (#922)
`Stephen B. Brauerman (#4952)
`Vanessa R. Tiradentes (#5398)
`Sara E. Bussiere (#5725)
`222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
`P.O. Box 25130
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 655-5000
`rkirk@bayardlaw.com
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`vtiradentes@bayardlaw.com
`sbussiere@bayardlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Dragon Intellectual
`Property, LLC
`
`/s/ David E. Moore
`Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 984-6000
`rhorwitz@potteranderson.com
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Ethan H. Townsend
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`Ethan H. Townsend (#5813)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`rsmith@mnat.com
`etownsend@mnat.com
`
`/s/ Ethan H. Townsend
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Karen Jacobs (#2881)
`Ethan H. Townsend (#5813)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`kjacobs@mnat.com
`etownsend@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc.,
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Charter Communications,
`Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Cox
`Communications, Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc.,
`and Verizon Communications Inc.
`
`-2-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 4
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 555
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`
`/s/ Rodger D. Smith II
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`rsmith@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant DISH Network L.L.C.
`
`/s/ Lauren E. Maguire
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`Lauren E. Maguire (#4261)
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`sbalick@ashby-geddes.com
`lmaguire@ashby-geddes.com
`amayo@ashby-geddes.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant DirecTV LLC
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`
`/s/ Jonathan Choa
`Philip A. Rovner (#3125)
`Jonathan A. Choa (#5319)
`Hercules Plaza,
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 984-6000
`provner@potteranderson.com
`jchoa@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
`
`/s/ Kelly E. Farnan
`Kelly E. Farnan (#4395)
`One Rodney Square
`P.O. Box 551
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 651-7705
`Farnan@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Time Warner Cable, Inc.
`
`-3-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 5
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 556
`
`Exhibit A
`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`1
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“broadcast program information”1 The Defendants proposed on December 11,
`2014 that the words “broadcast program
`information” in the preamble of claim 1
`should be construed. Dragon believes
`construction is not required. The parties
`have agreed to meet and confer on
`December 15, 2014.
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“programming information carried by the input
`signal source”
`
`(proposal of Apple, Charter, Comcast, Cox,
`DIRECTV, DISH, Sirius, Time Warner and
`Verizon)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 1:20-63;
`2:66-3:3; 3:54-60, 4:35-58; 5:20-36; 6:66-
`7:9; 7:26-49; 9:20-27.
`
`January 10, 2013 Request for Certificate of
`Correction
`March 5, 2013 Certificate of Correction
`
`“programming information transmitted to all
`users and carried by the input signal source”
`
`(proposal of AT&T)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: same as above.
`
`1 Defendants learned yesterday that Dragon is treating “broadcast program information” and “the broadcast program information” as two distinct terms with
`apparently different constructions, after Defendants had previously proposed a construction for “the broadcast program information” language on November 21.
`For this reason, they are presented as terms 1 and 6 on this chart. However, Defendants believe they are two occurences of the same term and thus have
`proposed the same construction for both. Dragon has not yet provided a construction for the first occurence of the term and Defendants reserve their rights to
`challenge any late proposal from Dragon as untimely.
`
`-1-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 6
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 557
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Function: powering the apparatus
`
`Structure: AC power source
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:19-23;
`November 15, 1995 Remarks/Amendment.
`
`“a keyboard having a record key and a
`separate playback key”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:18-22,
`3:54-67, 5:20-31, 6:25-49, 8:55-61, Figs.
`1-9.
`Summary of April 30, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of April 26, 1996 Examiner
`Interview
`
`Term
`No.
`2
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“means for powering the apparatus” Function: powering the apparatus.
`
`1
`
`3
`
`“a keyboard having a record key
`and a playback key”
`
`Means: An AC power source, or alternative
`power sources such as DC power sources or
`batteries.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:19-23;
`4:28-34.
`
`Plain meaning. Alternatively,
`
`“A keyboard that has one or more keys
`that function as a record key2 and a
`playback key.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:64-
`67; 4:39-61; 5:20-31.
`
`2 Bold terms are separately construed.
`
`-2-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 7
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 558
`
`Term
`No.
`4
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`1
`
`“record key”
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Plain meaning. Alternatively,
`
`“A key that, when actuated, signals the
`control circuit to initiate storage of
`program information in the memory unit
`of the device.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:64-
`67; 4:39-53; 5:20-25; 6:45-48; 8:55-57.
`
`Page 5, Paper No. 7 (Office Action
`Response dated 02/02/1994) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`Page 4, Paper No. 12 (Preliminary
`Amendment dated 04/28/1994) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`-3-
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“key that, when actuated, turns on a recording
`function of the apparatus to initiate recording”
`
`(proposal of Charter, Comcast, Cox,
`DIRECTV, Time Warner and Verizon)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:54-67,
`4:35-58, 5:20-36, 6:25-49, 7:10-24; Figs.
`1-9; Claims 1-14;
`May 5, 1993 Non-Final Office Action
`September 9, 1993 Remarks/Amendment
`December 2, 1993 Final Office Action
`February 2, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`April 28, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`November 17, 1994 Non-Final Office
`Action
`May 19, 1995 Remarks/Amendment
`August 11, 1995 Non-Final Office Action
`November 15, 1995 Remarks/Amendment
`February 20, 1996 Final Office Action
`July 22, 1996 Remarks/Amendment
`November 27, 1996 Non-Final Office
`Action
`March 8, 2013 Request for Supplemental
`Examination
`May 9, 2013 Supplemental Examination.
`Summary of January 15, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of April 26, 1996 Examiner
`Interview
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 8
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 559
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`
`5
`
`“control circuit”
`
`Plain meaning.
`
`Alternatively,
`
`“Circuitry that receives and outputs
`control signals.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:60-
`67; 4:39-61; 5:5-31; 6:31-48; 6:65-7:5.
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“key that controls a recording function”
`
`(proposal of Apple, AT&T, DISH and Sirius)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: same as above.
`
`Function: enabling substantially simultaneous
`recording and playback of program
`information is achieved when said record key
`is first actuated to begin a recording by
`initiating storage of the broadcast program
`information in said memory unit, and said
`playback key is subsequently and solely
`actuated to begin time delay playback of the
`recording from the beginning thereof by
`initiating retrieval of the stored program
`information in said memory unit.
`
`Structure: none disclosed, and therefore it is
`indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at Abstract;
`3:54-67; 5:5-36; 6:25-49; 6:66-7:9; Figs.
`7-9;
`July 22, 1996 Remarks/Amendment
`March 8, 2013 Request for Supplemental
`Examination
`May 9, 2013 Supplemental Examination
`
`-4-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 9
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 560
`
`Term
`No.
`6
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`1
`
`“the broadcast program
`information”
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`See “broadcast program information”
`above. Defendants assert that all instances
`of “broadcast program information” in the
`claims have the same meaning.
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“The broadcast program information
`presented after the record key is actuated
`and before the playback key is actuated.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 1:46-
`55; 2:51-56; 5:20-36; 8:28-33.
`
`Pages 4, 6 & 7, Paper No. 12 (Preliminary
`Amendment dated 04/28/1994) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`-5-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 10
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 561
`
`7
`
`1
`
`“[said record key is first actuated]3
`to begin a recording by initiating
`storage of the broadcast program
`information in said memory unit”
`
`“[said record key is first actuated] to
`initiate storage of the broadcast program
`information in the memory unit such that
`the information can be retrieved from the
`beginning and without missing any of the
`program information broadcast during the
`interruption” 4
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 1:46-55;
`2:51-56; 5:20-36; 8:28-33.
`
`Pages 4, 6 & 7, Paper No. 12 (Preliminary
`Amendment dated 04/28/1994) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`“said record key is first actuated to begin a
`recording by causing the storage of broadcast
`program information that otherwise would
`not have been stored in said memory unit”5
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 3:10-21;
`4:35-58; 5:20-36; 6:25-49; 8:28-32; Figs.
`1, 2, 6, 7;
`May 5, 1993 Non-Final Office Action
`September 9, 1993 Remarks/Amendment
`December 2, 1993 Final Office Action
`February 2, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`April 28, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`November 17, 1994 Non-Final Office
`Action
`May 19, 1995 Remarks/Amendment
`August 11, 1995 Non-Final Office Action
`November 15, 1995 Remarks/Amendment
`February 20, 1996 Final Office Action
`July 22, 1996 Remarks/Amendment
`November 27, 1996 Non-Final Office
`Action
`March 8, 2013 Request for Supplemental
`Examination
`May 9, 2013 Supplemental Examination.
`Summary of January 15, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of April 26, 1996 Examiner
`Interview
`
`-6-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 11
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 562
`
`3 Dragon proposed the term for construction commence with “to begin….” The Defendants disagree and have included this bracketed language for the
`proposed term and in their proposed construction. Dragon’s construction includes bracketed language to address the defendants’ proposal, but reserves the
`right to modify its proposal.
`4
`In this proposal and their proposed construction of Term No. 9, the Defendants have included statements regarding their views on the availability of the
`doctrine of equivalents with respect to certain claim terms. Dragon’s view is that these statements are not properly included in this submission, as the
`Defendants’ comments are directed to infringement issues, rather than claim construction issues. Draon requested that these statements be removed, but the
`defendants would not agree to remove the statements.
`In any event, Dragon disagrees with the Defendants’ comments, and asserts that it may prove
`infringement literally, or under the doctrine of equivalents, and that the range of equivalents is not limited in the manner suggested by the Defendants’
`comments. Dragon will elaborate on its position at the appropriate time.
`5 Defendants assert that the doctrine of equivalents is not applicable to at least this term due to prosecution history estoppel and respectfully submit that the
`question of whether the doctrine of equivalents is applicable should be determined during claim construction.
`-7-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 12
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 563
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“actuated after the record key, without
`actuating any other keys in the time between
`actuating the record key and the playback
`key”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 5:20-36;
`February 20, 1996 Final Office Action
`November 27, 1996 Non-Final Office
`Action
`July 22, 1996 Remarks/Amendment
`October 29, 1997 Remarks/Amendment
`March 8, 2013 Request for Supplemental
`Examination
`May 9, 2013 Supplemental Examination
`Summary of April 30, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of January 15, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of April 26, 1996 Examiner
`Interview
`
`Term
`No.
`8
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“subsequently and solely actuated” No construction necessary. If this term is
`to be construed, Dragon proposes the
`following construction:
`
`1
`
`“actuated after the record key, without
`actuating any other keys in the time
`between actuating the record key and the
`playback key.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 2:15-
`32; 2:47-50; 4:1-8; 5:20-36.
`
`Page 2, Paper No. 30 (Supplemental
`Amendment dated 10/29/1997) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`Paragraphs 5-15 of “Reasons for
`Substantial New Question of Patentability
`Determination,” dated 05/09/2013, of the
`prosecution history of a supplemental
`exam (Application No. 96/000,013) of the
`’444 patent.
`
`-8-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 13
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 564
`
`Term
`No.
`9
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`1
`
`“to begin time delay playback of
`the recording from the beginning
`thereof”
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`to begin time-delay playback of the
`recording of the broadcast program
`information from the beginning of the
`recording.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 2:51-
`56; 4:59-61; 5:20-36; 8:28-3.
`
`Page 4, Paper No. 12 (Preliminary
`Amendment dated 04/28/1994) of the
`prosecution history of the ’444 patent.
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`“to begin time delay playback of the just
`recorded program information from the
`beginning of that recording” 6
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 2:58-65;
`5:20-36;
`December 2, 1993 Final Office Action
`February 2, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`April 28, 1994 Remarks/Amendment
`November 17, 1994 Non-Final Office
`Action
`May 19, 1995 Remarks/Amendments
`August 11, 1995 Non-Final Office Action
`November 15, 1995 Remarks/Amendment
`February 20, 1996 Final Office Action
`July 22, 1996 Remarks/Amendment
`November 27, 1996 Non-Final Office
`Action
`March 8, 2013 Request for Supplemental
`Examination
`May 9, 2013 Supplemental Examination.
`Summary of April 30, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of January 15, 1997 Examiner
`Interview
`Summary of April 26, 1996 Examiner
`Interview
`
`6 Defendants assert that the doctrine of equivalents is not applicable to at least this term due to prosecution history estoppel and respectfully submit that the
`question of whether the doctrine of equivalents is applicable should be determined during claim construction.
`-9-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 14
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 565
`
`Term
`No.
`10
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`3
`
`“means for wireless
`communication between said
`remote control unit and said
`control circuit”
`
`11
`
`8
`
`“key means for enabling user
`control of the rate or sequence or
`both of transfer of program
`information from said memory unit
`to the user’s display device”
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Function: wireless communication
`
`Means: A receiver and transmitter
`interposed between the control circuit and
`keyboard for communication
`therebetween so as to enable keyboard to
`be placed within a discrete remote control
`housing.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:’444 Patent at 6:7-18.
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Function: providing wireless communication
`between said remote control unit and said
`control circuit.
`
`Structure: infrared light emitting diode and
`infrared photo detector.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:7-18;
`Figs. 3-4.
`
`Function: enabling the user to control the rate
`or sequence, or both, of the transfer of
`program information from the memory unit to
`the user’s display device.
`
`Function: enable user control of the rate or
`sequence or both of transfer of program
`information from said memory unit to the
`user’s display device
`
`Means: keys on the keyboard that, when
`actuated, cause the control circuit to vary the
`rate or sequence, or both, of the transfer of
`program information from the memory unit to
`the user’s display device.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:24-48.
`
`Structure: a discrete remote control with fast
`forward, reverse, pause and frame advance
`keys
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:7-65;
`Figs. 4-5.
`
`-10-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 15
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-02066-RGA Document 59-1 Filed 12/12/14 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 566
`
`Term
`No.
`12
`
`Claim Proposed term for construction
`
`10
`
`“a rate sufficiently slowly so that a
`user may review the content of the
`program information transferred
`from said memory unit on a frame
`by frame basis”
`
`Dragon’s proposed construction
`Citiation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Plain meaning. This claim term is self
`explanatory, and means:
`
`A rate that allows a user to view, on a
`frame by frame basis, program
`information being retrieved from the
`memory unit.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:49-55.
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction
`Citation to Intrinsic Evidence
`Indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’444 Patent at 6:25-65;
`Figs. 4-5.
`
`-11-
`
`Dish, Exh. 1014, p. 16