Paper No. 30
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG DISPLAY, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-004871
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2015-01717 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LG DISPLAY, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-004871
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2015-01717 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00487
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`
`
`
`We instituted the above-identified inter partes review. Paper 8.
`Subsequent to institution, IPR2015-01717 was joined with this proceeding.
`Paper 24. Both parties requested an oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70. Papers 25, 29. The parties’ request is granted.
`The hearing will commence at 10:00 AM Eastern Time, on
`MARCH 16, 2016, and will be conducted at the USPTO Central
`Headquarter located in Alexandria, Virginia (the ninth floor of Madison
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314). The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come first-serve basis.
`Each party will have 30 minutes of total time to present its arguments.
`Because Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged
`claims are unpatentable, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case as to
`the challenged claims and grounds the Board instituted trial. Thereafter,
`Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s case. Petitioner may reserve some
`of its argument time for use in further presentation after Patent Owner has
`responded to Petitioner’s initial presentation. No live testimony from any
`witness will be taken at the oral argument.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party will not be in attendance at
`oral hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference
`call no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00487
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the oral argument and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the oral argument.
`The hearing transcript will be entered in the record of this proceeding.
`The parties are reminded that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`The Board will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been so
`filed.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`five business days before the hearing date. The parties also shall provide a
`courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least three
`business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov.
`The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding
`without prior authorization from the Board.
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the
`Board at least two business days before the hearing. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits. See also CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00487
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`
`Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper 118)
`(The Board has the discretion to limit the parties’ demonstratives to pages in
`the record should there be no easy resolution to objections over
`demonstratives.).
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript. The parties also should note that one panel member
`will be attending the hearing electronically from the USPTO Detroit
`Regional Office and will only have access to the courtesy copy of the
`demonstratives provided in advance, as referenced above.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made 5 days in advance
`of the hearing date. The request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the
`request is not received timely, the equipment may not be available on the
`day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00487
`Patent 7,404,660 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda K. Streff
`Baldine B. Paul
`Anita Y. Lam
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`alam@mayerbrown.com
`DDGIPR@mayerbrown.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Justin B. Kimble
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`Terry A. Saad
`Nicholas C. Kliewer
`T. William Kennedy
`BRAGALONE CONROY P.C.
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`nkliewer@bcpc-law.com
`tsaad@bcpclaw.com
`bkennedy@bcpc-law.com
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
